SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Some notes on “Intelligence” James Atherton; February 2012
Some notes on “Intelligence” James Atherton; February 2012 In quotes because it is a contestable idea. The presentation does not purport to be a full account of the idea.
General  Specific  Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational  qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
Testing is central to the idea of intelligence General  Specific  Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational  qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
Tests can be either general or specific in their targets General  Specific  Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational  qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
Tests can be either general or specific in their targets In the case of most assessments, the focus is on what the person tested has already done General  Specific  Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational  qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
Tests can be either general or specific in their targets In the case of most assessments, the focus is on what the person tested has already done More difficult to test for is the issue of  potential  for the future General  Specific  Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational  qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
Intelligence goes for the most difficult area of all—a measure of  general potential General  Specific  Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational  qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
“ The power of good responses from the point of view of truth or fact” (Thorndike) “ A biological mechanism by which the effects of a complexity of stimuli are brought together and given a somewhat unified effect in behavior” (Peterson) “ The ability to carry on abstract thinking” (Terman) “ The ability to adapt oneself adequately to relatively new situations in life” (Pintner) “ The capacity for knowledge, and knowledge possessed” (Henmon) “ The capacity to acquire capacity” (Woodrow)
“ The power of good responses from the point of view of truth or fact” (Thorndike) “ A biological mechanism by which the effects of a complexity of stimuli are brought together and given a somewhat unified effect in behavior” (Peterson) “ The ability to carry on abstract thinking” (Terman) “ The ability to adapt oneself adequately to relatively new situations in life” (Pintner) “ The capacity for knowledge, and knowledge possessed” (Henmon) “ The capacity to acquire capacity” (Woodrow) Here are a few definitions from the literature!
“ The power of good responses from the point of view of truth or fact” (Thorndike) “ A biological mechanism by which the effects of a complexity of stimuli are brought together and given a somewhat unified effect in behavior” (Peterson) “ The ability to carry on abstract thinking” (Terman) “ The ability to adapt oneself adequately to relatively new situations in life” (Pintner) “ The capacity for knowledge, and knowledge possessed” (Henmon) “ The capacity to acquire capacity” (Woodrow) “ Viewed narrowly, there seem to be almost as many definitions of intelligence as there were experts asked to define it”  (Sternberg 1987)
 
But put the text through Wordle, and some themes do emerge
Potted history Francis Galton (1884) measures head size, reaction time etc., but finds no correlations Charles Spearman (1904) develops the idea of “general intelligence” or  g Alfred Binet (1905 on) devised tests to determine ineducability formulated idea of “Mental Age”  Lewis Terman adapted and standardised the Binet tests for American children (1916, latest revision 1986) David Wechsler developed the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale in 1939 (latest edition 1998) Various group tests devised subsequently
Current Stanford-Binet tests four broad areas verbal reasoning abstract/visual reasoning quantitative reasoning short-term memory
Abstract/visual reasoning Which of the figures to the right of the line are  not  the same as the one to the left? A   B   C   D E
Abstract/visual reasoning Which of the figures to the right of the line are  not  the same as the one to the left? A   B   C   D E
Abstract/visual reasoning Which of the figures to the right of the line are  not  the same as the one to the left? Note this assumes that you can only rotate the figures, not flip them as well. IQ test items need to be completely unambiguous! A   B   C   D E
Quantitative Reasoning The parcel post rate in the local zone is 18 cents for the first pound and 1½ cents for each additional pound. How many pounds can be sent in the local zone for $1.50? A: 88 B: 89 C: 100 D: 225 (US Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery)
Quantitative Reasoning The parcel post rate in the local zone is 18 cents for the first pound and 1½ cents for each additional pound. How many pounds can be sent in the local zone for $1.50? A: 88 B: 89 C: 100 D: 225 (US Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery)
Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56  35  20  10  ?  1   (Alice Heim)
Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56  35  20  10  ?  1 21   15  10  6    (Alice Heim) Clue 1
Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56  35  20  10  ?  1 21   15  10  6    6  5  4   (Alice Heim) Clue 2
Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56  35  20  10  ?  1 21   15  10  6    3   6  5  4   3 (Alice Heim) Clue 3
Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56  35  20  10  4  1 21   15  10  6    3   6  5  4   3 (Alice Heim)
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing This is a very traditional item at the simpler end of the scale
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing A poor item which just does not have a correct answer
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because...
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference...
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference.... ...it’s not about what the words  represent. ..
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference.... ...it’s not about what the words  represent. ..
Verbal Reasoning seed  is to  plant , as  egg  is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim   is the opposite of: hunter  happy   imposter   benefactor  cad   man Which is the  odd one out ?   captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference.... ...it’s not about what the words  represent. .. Why?
The (almost) normal distribution curve of IQ—the “Bell Curve”. based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18  n =2904 SD=16 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18  n =2904 SD=16 This is the mean: about 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18  n =2904 SD=16 The dashed lines are “standard deviations” from the mean. 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18  n =2904 SD=16 The dashed lines are “standard deviations” from the mean. About two-thirds of the population are within ± 1 S.D. of the mean 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18  n =2904 SD=16 The dashed lines are “standard deviations” from the mean. About two-thirds of the population are within ± 1 S.D. of the mean There are fewer people more than 2 S.Ds  above  the mean than there are  below. 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
Profound learning disability <20 Severe learning disability 20-34 Moderate learning disability 35-49 Mild learning disability 50-70 Low normal 70-90 Normal 90-110 High normal 110-130 “ Genius” 130+ Mental Age Chronological Age IQ = x 100
Issues around Intelligence (not covered here) Flynn effect  Fluid and Crystallised intelligence (Cattell, 1967) Convergent and Divergent thinking styles (Hudson, 1967) Multiple Intelligences (Gardner, 1983) Emotional Intelligence (Goleman, 1995) Mindsets/Self-theories (Dweck, 1996)
Convergent thinking - science and technology(?) Divergent thinking - arts and humanities(?) --except that this is a graphic of the Hudson styles
Political issues Early abuses including sterilisation laws on basis of IQ; continued until 1975 in Sweden of all places. Sir Cyril Burt: basis of 1944 Education Act, and accused of fraudulent results Arthur Jensen (1969) accused of racism, for identifying ethnic group differences in measured intelligence.  (Note; within group differences are more significant than those between groups, in broad terms.) Herrnstein R and Murray C, (1995)  The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life  (Glencoe: Ill. The Free Press) Ever since eugenics, (Dalton) intelligence has been a political issue .
Correlations between IQ and educational achievement at various levels Primary school 0.6-0.7 Secondary school 0.5-0.6 College 0.4-0.5 Post-graduate 0.3-0.4 Figures from US. terminology revised for UK: from Atkinson et al (1993) (+1 would be a perfect positive correlation).
Factors in educational achievement Motivation Opportunity Organisation Background “ Intelligence” Teaching
Factors in educational achievement The chain is only as strong as its weakest link—which could be any of these factors and more Motivation Opportunity Organisation Background “ Intelligence” Teaching
Spearman’s  g  factor (1904) Arrived at by factor analysis of results from tests Claims a  general  (hence  g ) component to intelligence, supplemented by  specific  components Critics suggest  g  is an artefact of method although “intelligence” may have a hierarchical structure and others maintain it may have 30+ components  Spearman, C. (1904). &quot;General intelligence,&quot; objectively determined and measured.  American Journal of Psychology ,  15 , 201-293
Spearman’s  g  factor (1904) Arrived at by factor analysis of results from tests Claims a  general  (hence  g ) component to intelligence, supplemented by  specific  components Critics suggest  g  is an artefact of method although “intelligence” may have a hierarchical structure and others maintain it may have 30+ components  Spearman, C. (1904). &quot;General intelligence,&quot; objectively determined and measured.  American Journal of Psychology ,  15 , 201-293 The argument that there is a single general factor measured by IQ tests is at one end of the scale of the debate...
Multiple Intelligences (Gardner)
Multiple Intelligences (Gardner) Gardner’s multiple intelligences model is the other end of the scale from the  g  model, and is arrived at quite differently (This is a purely impressionistic representation. Gardner does not use anything like it
http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/intelligence.htm for more detail and some references.

More Related Content

PPTX
Placement & links to all tests
PDF
Courses of action cetking must do 50 questions pdf for maharashtra mba cet
PPTX
Non verbal reasoning
PDF
Thinking and reasoning
PPT
Non –verbal reasoning
PPT
Psychometric Assessment
PPT
Assessment re-capitulated and questioned
PPT
Emotions 15
Placement & links to all tests
Courses of action cetking must do 50 questions pdf for maharashtra mba cet
Non verbal reasoning
Thinking and reasoning
Non –verbal reasoning
Psychometric Assessment
Assessment re-capitulated and questioned
Emotions 15

More from James Atherton (20)

PPT
Groups 10 for web
PPT
What are learning theories good for?
PPT
Mentor training presentation for PCE programme, 2013
PPTX
Problematising Assessment
PPTX
Aspects of curriculum
PPTX
Study Day 10.11.12 Evaluation
PPT
Mentors 2012
PPT
Sd 1 evaluation 061012
PPT
Liminality as liability
PPT
Study Day Evaluation 24 March 2012
PPT
Submission plan 10
PPT
Evaluations 030312
PPT
Interest group posters_030312
PPT
Basic introduction to using presentations to support teaching
PPT
Threshold Concepts and Professional Formation
PPTX
Swot reports from disciplinary interest groups
PPTX
Evaluation of first Year 2 Study Day on 12 November
PPT
Evaluation of year 1 study day
PPT
Nature of education_web_2011
PPT
Mentor Briefing 2011
Groups 10 for web
What are learning theories good for?
Mentor training presentation for PCE programme, 2013
Problematising Assessment
Aspects of curriculum
Study Day 10.11.12 Evaluation
Mentors 2012
Sd 1 evaluation 061012
Liminality as liability
Study Day Evaluation 24 March 2012
Submission plan 10
Evaluations 030312
Interest group posters_030312
Basic introduction to using presentations to support teaching
Threshold Concepts and Professional Formation
Swot reports from disciplinary interest groups
Evaluation of first Year 2 Study Day on 12 November
Evaluation of year 1 study day
Nature of education_web_2011
Mentor Briefing 2011
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PPTX
Introduction to Building Materials
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
Introduction to Building Materials
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
advance database management system book.pdf
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
Ad

Notes on "Intelligence"

  • 1. Some notes on “Intelligence” James Atherton; February 2012
  • 2. Some notes on “Intelligence” James Atherton; February 2012 In quotes because it is a contestable idea. The presentation does not purport to be a full account of the idea.
  • 3. General Specific Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
  • 4. Testing is central to the idea of intelligence General Specific Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
  • 5. Tests can be either general or specific in their targets General Specific Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
  • 6. Tests can be either general or specific in their targets In the case of most assessments, the focus is on what the person tested has already done General Specific Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
  • 7. Tests can be either general or specific in their targets In the case of most assessments, the focus is on what the person tested has already done More difficult to test for is the issue of potential for the future General Specific Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
  • 8. Intelligence goes for the most difficult area of all—a measure of general potential General Specific Aptitude Achievement Intelligence Subject-specific qualifications Tests for specific aptitudes (mechanical musical, etc.) Educational qualifications claiming general validity (GCSE etc.)
  • 9. “ The power of good responses from the point of view of truth or fact” (Thorndike) “ A biological mechanism by which the effects of a complexity of stimuli are brought together and given a somewhat unified effect in behavior” (Peterson) “ The ability to carry on abstract thinking” (Terman) “ The ability to adapt oneself adequately to relatively new situations in life” (Pintner) “ The capacity for knowledge, and knowledge possessed” (Henmon) “ The capacity to acquire capacity” (Woodrow)
  • 10. “ The power of good responses from the point of view of truth or fact” (Thorndike) “ A biological mechanism by which the effects of a complexity of stimuli are brought together and given a somewhat unified effect in behavior” (Peterson) “ The ability to carry on abstract thinking” (Terman) “ The ability to adapt oneself adequately to relatively new situations in life” (Pintner) “ The capacity for knowledge, and knowledge possessed” (Henmon) “ The capacity to acquire capacity” (Woodrow) Here are a few definitions from the literature!
  • 11. “ The power of good responses from the point of view of truth or fact” (Thorndike) “ A biological mechanism by which the effects of a complexity of stimuli are brought together and given a somewhat unified effect in behavior” (Peterson) “ The ability to carry on abstract thinking” (Terman) “ The ability to adapt oneself adequately to relatively new situations in life” (Pintner) “ The capacity for knowledge, and knowledge possessed” (Henmon) “ The capacity to acquire capacity” (Woodrow) “ Viewed narrowly, there seem to be almost as many definitions of intelligence as there were experts asked to define it” (Sternberg 1987)
  • 12.  
  • 13. But put the text through Wordle, and some themes do emerge
  • 14. Potted history Francis Galton (1884) measures head size, reaction time etc., but finds no correlations Charles Spearman (1904) develops the idea of “general intelligence” or g Alfred Binet (1905 on) devised tests to determine ineducability formulated idea of “Mental Age” Lewis Terman adapted and standardised the Binet tests for American children (1916, latest revision 1986) David Wechsler developed the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale in 1939 (latest edition 1998) Various group tests devised subsequently
  • 15. Current Stanford-Binet tests four broad areas verbal reasoning abstract/visual reasoning quantitative reasoning short-term memory
  • 16. Abstract/visual reasoning Which of the figures to the right of the line are not the same as the one to the left? A B C D E
  • 17. Abstract/visual reasoning Which of the figures to the right of the line are not the same as the one to the left? A B C D E
  • 18. Abstract/visual reasoning Which of the figures to the right of the line are not the same as the one to the left? Note this assumes that you can only rotate the figures, not flip them as well. IQ test items need to be completely unambiguous! A B C D E
  • 19. Quantitative Reasoning The parcel post rate in the local zone is 18 cents for the first pound and 1½ cents for each additional pound. How many pounds can be sent in the local zone for $1.50? A: 88 B: 89 C: 100 D: 225 (US Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery)
  • 20. Quantitative Reasoning The parcel post rate in the local zone is 18 cents for the first pound and 1½ cents for each additional pound. How many pounds can be sent in the local zone for $1.50? A: 88 B: 89 C: 100 D: 225 (US Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery)
  • 21. Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56 35 20 10 ? 1 (Alice Heim)
  • 22. Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56 35 20 10 ? 1 21 15 10 6 (Alice Heim) Clue 1
  • 23. Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56 35 20 10 ? 1 21 15 10 6 6 5 4 (Alice Heim) Clue 2
  • 24. Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56 35 20 10 ? 1 21 15 10 6 3 6 5 4 3 (Alice Heim) Clue 3
  • 25. Quantitative Reasoning What is the missing number? 56 35 20 10 4 1 21 15 10 6 3 6 5 4 3 (Alice Heim)
  • 26. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing
  • 27. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing This is a very traditional item at the simpler end of the scale
  • 28. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing
  • 29. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing A poor item which just does not have a correct answer
  • 30. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing
  • 31. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because...
  • 32. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference...
  • 33. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference.... ...it’s not about what the words represent. ..
  • 34. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference.... ...it’s not about what the words represent. ..
  • 35. Verbal Reasoning seed is to plant , as egg is to: tree root pollen oats potato bird Victim is the opposite of: hunter happy imposter benefactor cad man Which is the odd one out ? captain frustrate house labour swing This one is really tough—because... ...you have to change your frame of reference.... ...it’s not about what the words represent. .. Why?
  • 36. The (almost) normal distribution curve of IQ—the “Bell Curve”. based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18 n =2904 SD=16 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
  • 37. based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18 n =2904 SD=16 This is the mean: about 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
  • 38. based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18 n =2904 SD=16 The dashed lines are “standard deviations” from the mean. 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
  • 39. based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18 n =2904 SD=16 The dashed lines are “standard deviations” from the mean. About two-thirds of the population are within ± 1 S.D. of the mean 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
  • 40. based on the Terman-Merrill standardisation group(1937) Ages 2 to 18 n =2904 SD=16 The dashed lines are “standard deviations” from the mean. About two-thirds of the population are within ± 1 S.D. of the mean There are fewer people more than 2 S.Ds above the mean than there are below. 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 145 155 165 % of population IQ score
  • 41. Profound learning disability <20 Severe learning disability 20-34 Moderate learning disability 35-49 Mild learning disability 50-70 Low normal 70-90 Normal 90-110 High normal 110-130 “ Genius” 130+ Mental Age Chronological Age IQ = x 100
  • 42. Issues around Intelligence (not covered here) Flynn effect Fluid and Crystallised intelligence (Cattell, 1967) Convergent and Divergent thinking styles (Hudson, 1967) Multiple Intelligences (Gardner, 1983) Emotional Intelligence (Goleman, 1995) Mindsets/Self-theories (Dweck, 1996)
  • 43. Convergent thinking - science and technology(?) Divergent thinking - arts and humanities(?) --except that this is a graphic of the Hudson styles
  • 44. Political issues Early abuses including sterilisation laws on basis of IQ; continued until 1975 in Sweden of all places. Sir Cyril Burt: basis of 1944 Education Act, and accused of fraudulent results Arthur Jensen (1969) accused of racism, for identifying ethnic group differences in measured intelligence. (Note; within group differences are more significant than those between groups, in broad terms.) Herrnstein R and Murray C, (1995) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (Glencoe: Ill. The Free Press) Ever since eugenics, (Dalton) intelligence has been a political issue .
  • 45. Correlations between IQ and educational achievement at various levels Primary school 0.6-0.7 Secondary school 0.5-0.6 College 0.4-0.5 Post-graduate 0.3-0.4 Figures from US. terminology revised for UK: from Atkinson et al (1993) (+1 would be a perfect positive correlation).
  • 46. Factors in educational achievement Motivation Opportunity Organisation Background “ Intelligence” Teaching
  • 47. Factors in educational achievement The chain is only as strong as its weakest link—which could be any of these factors and more Motivation Opportunity Organisation Background “ Intelligence” Teaching
  • 48. Spearman’s g factor (1904) Arrived at by factor analysis of results from tests Claims a general (hence g ) component to intelligence, supplemented by specific components Critics suggest g is an artefact of method although “intelligence” may have a hierarchical structure and others maintain it may have 30+ components Spearman, C. (1904). &quot;General intelligence,&quot; objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology , 15 , 201-293
  • 49. Spearman’s g factor (1904) Arrived at by factor analysis of results from tests Claims a general (hence g ) component to intelligence, supplemented by specific components Critics suggest g is an artefact of method although “intelligence” may have a hierarchical structure and others maintain it may have 30+ components Spearman, C. (1904). &quot;General intelligence,&quot; objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology , 15 , 201-293 The argument that there is a single general factor measured by IQ tests is at one end of the scale of the debate...
  • 51. Multiple Intelligences (Gardner) Gardner’s multiple intelligences model is the other end of the scale from the g model, and is arrived at quite differently (This is a purely impressionistic representation. Gardner does not use anything like it