SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
274
On Fixed Point theorems in Fuzzy Metric Spaces
Shailesh T.Patel ,Ramakant Bhardwaj*,Rakesh Shrivastava**,Shyam Patkar*,Sanjay Choudhary***
The Research Scholar of Singhania University, Pacheri Bari (Jhunjhunu)
*Truba Institutions of Engineering & I.T. Bhopal, (M.P.)
**JNCT, Bhopal.
***Prof.&Head Deptt.of Mathematics Govt.NMV Hoshangabad.
Abstract: This paper presents some common fixed point theorems for occasionally weakly compatible mappings
in fuzzy metric spaces.
Keywords: Occasionally weakly compatible mappings,fuzzy metric space.
1. Introduction
Fuzzy set was defined by Zadeh [7]. Kramosil and Michalek [5] introduced fuzzy metric space, George and
Veermani [2] modified the notion of fuzzy metric spaces with the help of continuous t-norms. Many researchers
have obtained common fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying different types.introduced the new concept
continuous mappings and established some common fixed point theorems.open problem on the existence of
contractive definition which generates a fixed point but does not force the mappings to be continuous at the fixed
point.this paper presents some common fixed point theorems for more general .
2 Preliminary Notes
Definition 2.1 [7] A fuzzy set A in X is a function with domain X and values in [0,1].
Definition 2.2 [6] A binary operation * : [0,1]× [0,1]→[0,1] is a continuous t-norms if *is satisfying conditions:
(1) *is an commutative and associative;
(2) * is continuous;
(3) a *1 = a forall a ϵ [0,1];
(4) a * b ≤ c * d whenever a ≤ c and b ≤ d, and a,b,c,d є [0,1].
Definition 2.3 [2] A 3-tuple (X,M,*) is said to be a fuzzy metric space if X is an arbitrary set, * is a continuous t-
norm and M is a fuzzy set on X2
× (0,∞) satisfying the following conditions, for all x,y,z є X, s,t>0,
(f1)M(x,y,t) > 0;
(f2)M(x,y,t) = 1 if and only if x = y;
(f3) M(x,y,t) = M(y,x,t);
(f4)M(x,y,t)* M(y,z,s) ≤ M(x,z,t+s) ;
(f5)M(x,y,.): (0,∞)→(0,1] is continuous.
Then M is called a fuzzy metric on X.Then M(x,y,t) denotes the degree of nearness between x and y with respect
to t.
Definition 2.4[2]Let (X,d) be a metric space.Denotea * b = ab for all a,bє [0,1] and Md be fuzzy sets onX2
× (0,∞)
defined as follows:
Md(x,y,t)= ),( yxdt
t
+
.
Then (X, Md, *) is a fuzzy metric space.Wecall this fuzzy metric induced by a metric d as the standard
intuitionistic fuzzy metric.
Definition 2.5[2]Let (X, M, *) is a fuzzy metric space.Then
(a) a sequence {xn} in X is said to convers to x in X if for each є>o and each t>o, Nno ∈∃ such
That M(xn,x,t)>1-є for all n≥no.
(b)a sequence {xn} in X is said to cauchy to if for each ϵ>o and each t>o, Nno ∈∃ such
That M(xn,xm,t)>1-є for all n,m≥no.
(c) A fuzzy metric space in which euery Cauchy sequence is convergent is said to be complete.Definition 2.6[3]
Two self mappings f and g of a fuzzy metric space (X,M,*) are called compatible if
1),,(lim =
∞→
tgfxfgxM nn
n
whenever {xn} is a sequencein X such that xgxfx n
n
n
n
==
∞→∞→
limlim
For some x in X.
Definition 2.7[1]Twoself mappings f and g of a fuzzy metric space (X,M,*) are called reciprocally continuous on
X if fxfgxn
n
=
∞→
lim and gxgfxn
n
=
∞→
lim whenever {xn} is a sequence in X such that
xgxfx n
n
n
n
==
∞→∞→
limlim for some x in X.
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
275
Lemma 2.8[4] Let X be a set, f,gowcself maps of X. If f and g have a unique point of coincidence, w = fx = gx,
then w is the unique common fixed point of f and g.
3 Main Results
Theorem 3.1Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the
pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) such that
∫
).,(
0
)(
qtRyPxM
dttξ
M(Px,Ry,qt)≥ min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)} ……………(1)
For all x,yєX and for all t>o, then there exists a unique point wєX such that Pw = Sw = w and a unique point zєX
such that Rz = Tz = z. Moreover z = w so that there is a unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T.
Proof :Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yϵX such that Px=Sx andRy=Ty. We claim
thatPx=Ry. If not, by inequality (1)
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)}
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ min{ M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Ry,Px,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)}
≥ min{ M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t),
M(Px,Ry,t),M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)*1}
=M(Px,Ry,t).
Therefore Px = Ry, i.e. Px = Sx = Ry = Ty. Suppose that there is a another point z such that Pz = Sz then by
(1) we have Pz = Sz = Ry = Ty, so Px=Pz and w = Px = Sx is the unique point of coincidence of P and S.By
Lemma 2.8 w is the only common fixed point of P and S.Similarly there is a unique point zєX such that z = Rz =
Tz.
Assume that w ≠ z. we have
M(w,z,qt) = M(Pw,Rz,qt)
≥min{ M(Sw,Tz,t), M(Sw,Pw,t), M(Rz,Tz,t), M(Pw,Tz,t), M(Rz,Sw,t),
M(Pw,Rz,t), M(Sw,Tz,t)* M(Pw,Pw,t)}
≥ min{ M(w,z,t), M(w,w,t), M(z,z,t), M(w,z,t), M(z,w,t),
M(w,z,t), M(w,z,t)* M(w,w,t)}
=M(w,z,t).
Therefore we have z = w and z is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds.
Theorem 3.2 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the
pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) such that
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø( min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)}) ……………(2)
For all x,yєXand Ø: [0,1]→[0,1] such that Ø(t) > t for all 0<t<1, then there existsa unique common fixed point of
P,R,S and T.
Proof :Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yєX such that Px = Sx and Ry = Ty. We
claim that Px = Ry. If not, by inequality (2)
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø( min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)})
>Ø(M(Px,Ry,t)). From Theorem 3.1
=M(Px,Ry,t).
Assume that w ≠ z. we have
M(w,z,qt) = M(Pw,Rz,qt)
≥min{ M(Sw,Tz,t), M(Sw,Pw,t), M(Rz,Tz,t), M(Pw,Tz,t), M(Rz,Sw,t),
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
276
M(Pw,Rz,t), M(Sw,Tz,t)* M(Pw,Pw,t)}
=M(w,z,t). From Theorem 3.1
Therefore we have z = w and z is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds.
Theorem 3.3 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the
pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) such that
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø(M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)) ……………(3)
For all x,yєXand Ø: [0,1]7
→[0,1] such that Ø(t,1,1,t,t,1,t) > t for all 0<t <1, then there exists a unique common
fixed point of P,R,S and T.
Proof: Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yϵX such that Px = Sx and Ry = Ty. We
claim that Px = Ry. If not, by inequality (3)
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø(M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t))
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø(M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Ry,Px,t),
M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t))
= Ø(M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t),
M(Px,Ry,t),M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)*1)
= Ø(M(Px,Ry,t), 1, 1, M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t),M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t))
>M(Px,Ry,t).
A contradiction, therefore Px = Ry, i.e. Px = Sx = Ry = Ty. Suppose that there is a another point z such that Pz =
Sz then by (3) we have Pz = Sz = Ry = Ty, so Px=Pz and w = Px = Sx is the unique point of coincidence of P
and S.By Lemma 2.8 w is the only common fixed point of P and S.Similarly there is a unique point zϵX such
that z = Rz = Tz.Thus z is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds from
(3).
Theorem 3.4 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the
pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yєX and t > 0
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) ………………… (4)
Then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T.
Proof: Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yєX such that Px = Sx and Ry = Ty. We
claim that Px = Ry. If not, by inequality (4)
We have
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t)
= M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)* M(Ty,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)
= M(Px,Ry,t)* 1* 1* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)
>M(Px,Ry,t).
Thus we have Px = Ry, i.e. Px = Sx = Ry = Ty. Suppose that there is a another point z such that Pz = Sz then by
(4) we have Pz = Sz = Ry = Ty, so Px=Pz and w = Px = Sx is the unique point of coincidence of P and
S.Similarly there is a unique point zϵX such that z = Rz = Tz.Thus w is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T.
Corollary 3.5 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the
pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yϵX and t > 0
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,2t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) …………………(5)
Then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T.
Proof: We have
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,2t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t)
≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Ty,Ry,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t)
≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t) * M(Px,Ry,t)*
Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications
277
M(Sx,Ty,t)
= M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)* M(Ty,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)
= M(Px,Ry,t)* 1* 1* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)*
M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)
>M(Px,Ry,t).
And therefore from theorem 3.4, P,R,S and T have a common fixed point.
Corollary 3.6 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the
pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yєX and t > 0
M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t) …………………(6)
Then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T.
Proof: The Proof follows from Corollary 3.5
Theorem 3.7 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space.Then continuous self-mappings S and T of X have
a common fixed point in X if and only if there exites a self mapping P of X such that the following conditions
are satisfied
(i) PX ⊂ TX I SX
(ii) The pairs {P,S} and {P,T} are weakly compatible,
(iii) There exists a point qє(0,1) such that for all x,yєX and t > 0
M(Px,Py,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Py,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Py,Sx,t)
…………………(7)
Then P,S and T havea unique common fixed point.
Proof: Since compatible implies ows, the result follows from Theorem 3.4
Theorem 3.8 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P and R be self-mappings of X. Let the P
and R areowc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yєX and t > 0
M(Sx,Sy,qt) ≥αM(Px,Py,t)+β min{M(Px,Py,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Sy,Py,t), M(Sx,Py,t)}
…………………(8)
For all x,yϵ X where α,β> 0, α+β> 1. Then P and S have a unique common fixed point.
Proof: Let the pairs {P,S} be owc, so there are points x єX such that Px = Sx. Suppose that exist another point y
єX for whichPy = Sy. We claim that Sx = Sy. By inequality (8)
We have
M(Sx,Sy,qt) ≥αM(Px,Py,t)+ β min{M(Px,Py,t) , M(Sx,Px,t), M(Sy,Py,t), M(Sx,Py,t)}
=αM(Sx,Sy,t)+ β min{M(Sx,Sy,t) , M(Sx,Sx,t), M(Sy,Sy,t), M(Sx,Sy,t)}
=(α+β)M(Sx,Sy,t)
A contradiction, since (α+β)> 1.Therefore Sx = Sy. Therefore Px = Py and Px is unique.
From lemma2.8 , P and S have a unique fixed point.
Acknowledgement: One of the author (Dr. R.K. B.) is thankful to MPCOST Bhopal for the project No 2556
References
[1]P.Balasubramaniam,S.Murlisankar,R.P.Pant,”Common fixed points of four mappings in a fuzzy metric
spaces”,J.Fuzzy Math. 10(2) (2002), 379-384.
[2]A.George, P.Veeramani,”On some results in fuzzy metric spaces”,Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 64 (1994), 395-
399.
[3]G.Jungck,”Compatible mappings and common fixed points (2)”,Internat.J.Math.Sci. (1988), 285-288.
[4]G.Jungck and B.E.Rhoades,”Fixed Point Theorems for Occasionally Weakly compatible Mappings”,Fixed
Point Theory, Volume 7, No. 2, 2006, 287-296.
[5]O.Kramosil and J.Michalek,”Fuzzy metric and statistical metric spaces”,Kybernetika, 11 (1975), 326-334.
[6]B.Schweizer and A.Sklar,”Statistical metric spaces”,Pacific J. Math.10 (1960),313-334
[7]L.A.Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform and Control 8 (1965), 338-353.
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR PAPERS
The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/
The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

More Related Content

PDF
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces in integral type
PDF
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy 2 metric spaces and fuzzy 3-metric spaces
PDF
Common Fixed Point Theorems For Occasionally Weakely Compatible Mappings
PDF
On common fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space
PDF
Fixed point theorems for four mappings in fuzzy metric space using implicit r...
PDF
Common fixed point theorem for occasionally weakly compatible mapping in q fu...
PDF
Unique fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive condition in o...
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces in integral type
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy 2 metric spaces and fuzzy 3-metric spaces
Common Fixed Point Theorems For Occasionally Weakely Compatible Mappings
On common fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space
Fixed point theorems for four mappings in fuzzy metric space using implicit r...
Common fixed point theorem for occasionally weakly compatible mapping in q fu...
Unique fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive condition in o...
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...

What's hot (16)

PDF
Extension of Some Common Fixed Point Theorems using Compatible Mappings in Fu...
PDF
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
PDF
Complete l fuzzy metric spaces and common fixed point theorems
PDF
Common fixed theorems for weakly compatible mappings via an
PDF
Fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space with e.a property
PDF
Some Common Fixed Point Results for Expansive Mappings in a Cone Metric Space
PDF
B043007014
PDF
Hk3114251433
PDF
Compatible Mapping and Common Fixed Point Theorem
PDF
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 2 metric spa...
PDF
Common fixed point theorems with continuously subcompatible mappings in fuzz...
PDF
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
PDF
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
PDF
Common fixed point theorems for random operators in hilbert space
PDF
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
PDF
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 3 metric spa...
Extension of Some Common Fixed Point Theorems using Compatible Mappings in Fu...
The existence of common fixed point theorems of generalized contractive mappi...
Complete l fuzzy metric spaces and common fixed point theorems
Common fixed theorems for weakly compatible mappings via an
Fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space with e.a property
Some Common Fixed Point Results for Expansive Mappings in a Cone Metric Space
B043007014
Hk3114251433
Compatible Mapping and Common Fixed Point Theorem
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 2 metric spa...
Common fixed point theorems with continuously subcompatible mappings in fuzz...
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
CONTINUITY ON N-ARY SPACES
Common fixed point theorems for random operators in hilbert space
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 3 metric spa...
Ad

Viewers also liked (6)

PDF
Emerging Market’S Future
PPTX
Traffic elements
PDF
Xpp AIESEC In Hyderabad
PDF
Proyecto higiene postural
PDF
Proyecto Higiene Postural
PDF
Social Media for Events
Emerging Market’S Future
Traffic elements
Xpp AIESEC In Hyderabad
Proyecto higiene postural
Proyecto Higiene Postural
Social Media for Events
Ad

Similar to On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces (20)

PDF
B043007014
PDF
B043007014
PDF
A Common Fixed Point Theorem on Fuzzy Metric Space Using Weakly Compatible an...
PDF
Common fixed point theorems using faintly compatible
PDF
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES)
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem of Compatible of Type (R) Using Implicit Relation in Fuzz...
PDF
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
PDF
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
PDF
On fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
PDF
Gh3611391145
PDF
8 fixed point theorem in complete fuzzy metric space 8 megha shrivastava
PDF
Bd32360363
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
Common Fixed Point Theorems in Compatible Mappings of Type (P*) of Generalize...
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...
B043007014
B043007014
A Common Fixed Point Theorem on Fuzzy Metric Space Using Weakly Compatible an...
Common fixed point theorems using faintly compatible
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES)
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space Using (CLRg) Property
Fixed Point Theorem of Compatible of Type (R) Using Implicit Relation in Fuzz...
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
On fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
Gh3611391145
8 fixed point theorem in complete fuzzy metric space 8 megha shrivastava
Bd32360363
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
Common Fixed Point Theorems in Compatible Mappings of Type (P*) of Generalize...
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
A common fixed point theorems in menger space using occationally weakly compa...

More from Alexander Decker (20)

PDF
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
PDF
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
PDF
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
PDF
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
PDF
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
PDF
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
PDF
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
PDF
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
PDF
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
PDF
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
PDF
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
PDF
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
PDF
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
PDF
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
PDF
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
PDF
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
PDF
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
PDF
A survey of provenance leveraged
PDF
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
PDF
A study to measures the financial health of
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
A survey of provenance leveraged
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
A study to measures the financial health of

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
PDF
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
PDF
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
PPTX
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
PPTX
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
PDF
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
PPTX
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
PDF
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
PDF
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
PPTX
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
Diabetes mellitus diagnosis method based random forest with bat algorithm
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
Dropbox Q2 2025 Financial Results & Investor Presentation
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
sap open course for s4hana steps from ECC to s4
Agricultural_Statistics_at_a_Glance_2022_0.pdf
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
The Rise and Fall of 3GPP – Time for a Sabbatical?
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
Architecting across the Boundaries of two Complex Domains - Healthcare & Tech...
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
Big Data Technologies - Introduction.pptx
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx

On fixed point theorems in fuzzy metric spaces

  • 1. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 274 On Fixed Point theorems in Fuzzy Metric Spaces Shailesh T.Patel ,Ramakant Bhardwaj*,Rakesh Shrivastava**,Shyam Patkar*,Sanjay Choudhary*** The Research Scholar of Singhania University, Pacheri Bari (Jhunjhunu) *Truba Institutions of Engineering & I.T. Bhopal, (M.P.) **JNCT, Bhopal. ***Prof.&Head Deptt.of Mathematics Govt.NMV Hoshangabad. Abstract: This paper presents some common fixed point theorems for occasionally weakly compatible mappings in fuzzy metric spaces. Keywords: Occasionally weakly compatible mappings,fuzzy metric space. 1. Introduction Fuzzy set was defined by Zadeh [7]. Kramosil and Michalek [5] introduced fuzzy metric space, George and Veermani [2] modified the notion of fuzzy metric spaces with the help of continuous t-norms. Many researchers have obtained common fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying different types.introduced the new concept continuous mappings and established some common fixed point theorems.open problem on the existence of contractive definition which generates a fixed point but does not force the mappings to be continuous at the fixed point.this paper presents some common fixed point theorems for more general . 2 Preliminary Notes Definition 2.1 [7] A fuzzy set A in X is a function with domain X and values in [0,1]. Definition 2.2 [6] A binary operation * : [0,1]× [0,1]→[0,1] is a continuous t-norms if *is satisfying conditions: (1) *is an commutative and associative; (2) * is continuous; (3) a *1 = a forall a ϵ [0,1]; (4) a * b ≤ c * d whenever a ≤ c and b ≤ d, and a,b,c,d є [0,1]. Definition 2.3 [2] A 3-tuple (X,M,*) is said to be a fuzzy metric space if X is an arbitrary set, * is a continuous t- norm and M is a fuzzy set on X2 × (0,∞) satisfying the following conditions, for all x,y,z є X, s,t>0, (f1)M(x,y,t) > 0; (f2)M(x,y,t) = 1 if and only if x = y; (f3) M(x,y,t) = M(y,x,t); (f4)M(x,y,t)* M(y,z,s) ≤ M(x,z,t+s) ; (f5)M(x,y,.): (0,∞)→(0,1] is continuous. Then M is called a fuzzy metric on X.Then M(x,y,t) denotes the degree of nearness between x and y with respect to t. Definition 2.4[2]Let (X,d) be a metric space.Denotea * b = ab for all a,bє [0,1] and Md be fuzzy sets onX2 × (0,∞) defined as follows: Md(x,y,t)= ),( yxdt t + . Then (X, Md, *) is a fuzzy metric space.Wecall this fuzzy metric induced by a metric d as the standard intuitionistic fuzzy metric. Definition 2.5[2]Let (X, M, *) is a fuzzy metric space.Then (a) a sequence {xn} in X is said to convers to x in X if for each є>o and each t>o, Nno ∈∃ such That M(xn,x,t)>1-є for all n≥no. (b)a sequence {xn} in X is said to cauchy to if for each ϵ>o and each t>o, Nno ∈∃ such That M(xn,xm,t)>1-є for all n,m≥no. (c) A fuzzy metric space in which euery Cauchy sequence is convergent is said to be complete.Definition 2.6[3] Two self mappings f and g of a fuzzy metric space (X,M,*) are called compatible if 1),,(lim = ∞→ tgfxfgxM nn n whenever {xn} is a sequencein X such that xgxfx n n n n == ∞→∞→ limlim For some x in X. Definition 2.7[1]Twoself mappings f and g of a fuzzy metric space (X,M,*) are called reciprocally continuous on X if fxfgxn n = ∞→ lim and gxgfxn n = ∞→ lim whenever {xn} is a sequence in X such that xgxfx n n n n == ∞→∞→ limlim for some x in X.
  • 2. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 275 Lemma 2.8[4] Let X be a set, f,gowcself maps of X. If f and g have a unique point of coincidence, w = fx = gx, then w is the unique common fixed point of f and g. 3 Main Results Theorem 3.1Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) such that ∫ ).,( 0 )( qtRyPxM dttξ M(Px,Ry,qt)≥ min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)} ……………(1) For all x,yєX and for all t>o, then there exists a unique point wєX such that Pw = Sw = w and a unique point zєX such that Rz = Tz = z. Moreover z = w so that there is a unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Proof :Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yϵX such that Px=Sx andRy=Ty. We claim thatPx=Ry. If not, by inequality (1) M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)} M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ min{ M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Ry,Px,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)} ≥ min{ M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t),M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)*1} =M(Px,Ry,t). Therefore Px = Ry, i.e. Px = Sx = Ry = Ty. Suppose that there is a another point z such that Pz = Sz then by (1) we have Pz = Sz = Ry = Ty, so Px=Pz and w = Px = Sx is the unique point of coincidence of P and S.By Lemma 2.8 w is the only common fixed point of P and S.Similarly there is a unique point zєX such that z = Rz = Tz. Assume that w ≠ z. we have M(w,z,qt) = M(Pw,Rz,qt) ≥min{ M(Sw,Tz,t), M(Sw,Pw,t), M(Rz,Tz,t), M(Pw,Tz,t), M(Rz,Sw,t), M(Pw,Rz,t), M(Sw,Tz,t)* M(Pw,Pw,t)} ≥ min{ M(w,z,t), M(w,w,t), M(z,z,t), M(w,z,t), M(z,w,t), M(w,z,t), M(w,z,t)* M(w,w,t)} =M(w,z,t). Therefore we have z = w and z is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds. Theorem 3.2 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) such that M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø( min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)}) ……………(2) For all x,yєXand Ø: [0,1]→[0,1] such that Ø(t) > t for all 0<t<1, then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Proof :Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yєX such that Px = Sx and Ry = Ty. We claim that Px = Ry. If not, by inequality (2) M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø( min{ M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)}) >Ø(M(Px,Ry,t)). From Theorem 3.1 =M(Px,Ry,t). Assume that w ≠ z. we have M(w,z,qt) = M(Pw,Rz,qt) ≥min{ M(Sw,Tz,t), M(Sw,Pw,t), M(Rz,Tz,t), M(Pw,Tz,t), M(Rz,Sw,t),
  • 3. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 276 M(Pw,Rz,t), M(Sw,Tz,t)* M(Pw,Pw,t)} =M(w,z,t). From Theorem 3.1 Therefore we have z = w and z is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds. Theorem 3.3 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) such that M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø(M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)) ……………(3) For all x,yєXand Ø: [0,1]7 →[0,1] such that Ø(t,1,1,t,t,1,t) > t for all 0<t <1, then there exists a unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Proof: Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yϵX such that Px = Sx and Ry = Ty. We claim that Px = Ry. If not, by inequality (3) M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø(M(Sx,Ty,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Ry,Ty,t), M(Px,Ty,t), M(Ry,Sx,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Px,Px,t)) M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ Ø(M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Ry,Px,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)) = Ø(M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Px,t), M(Ty,Ty,t), M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t),M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)*1) = Ø(M(Px,Ry,t), 1, 1, M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t),M(Px,Ry,t), M(Px,Ry,t)) >M(Px,Ry,t). A contradiction, therefore Px = Ry, i.e. Px = Sx = Ry = Ty. Suppose that there is a another point z such that Pz = Sz then by (3) we have Pz = Sz = Ry = Ty, so Px=Pz and w = Px = Sx is the unique point of coincidence of P and S.By Lemma 2.8 w is the only common fixed point of P and S.Similarly there is a unique point zϵX such that z = Rz = Tz.Thus z is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. The uniqueness of the fixed point holds from (3). Theorem 3.4 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yєX and t > 0 M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) ………………… (4) Then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Proof: Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc, so there are points x,yєX such that Px = Sx and Ry = Ty. We claim that Px = Ry. If not, by inequality (4) We have M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) = M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)* M(Ty,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t) = M(Px,Ry,t)* 1* 1* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t) >M(Px,Ry,t). Thus we have Px = Ry, i.e. Px = Sx = Ry = Ty. Suppose that there is a another point z such that Pz = Sz then by (4) we have Pz = Sz = Ry = Ty, so Px=Pz and w = Px = Sx is the unique point of coincidence of P and S.Similarly there is a unique point zϵX such that z = Rz = Tz.Thus w is a common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Corollary 3.5 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yϵX and t > 0 M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,2t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) …………………(5) Then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Proof: We have M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Ry,Sx,2t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Ty,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Sx,Ty,t) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Ry,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t) * M(Px,Ry,t)*
  • 4. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.3, No.6, 2013-Selected from International Conference on Recent Trends in Applied Sciences with Engineering Applications 277 M(Sx,Ty,t) = M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Px,t)* M(Ty,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t) = M(Px,Ry,t)* 1* 1* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Ry,Px,t)* M(Px,Ry,t)* M(Px,Ry,t) >M(Px,Ry,t). And therefore from theorem 3.4, P,R,S and T have a common fixed point. Corollary 3.6 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P,R,S and T be self-mappings of X. Let the pairs {P,S} and {R,T} be owc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yєX and t > 0 M(Px,Ry,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t) …………………(6) Then there existsa unique common fixed point of P,R,S and T. Proof: The Proof follows from Corollary 3.5 Theorem 3.7 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space.Then continuous self-mappings S and T of X have a common fixed point in X if and only if there exites a self mapping P of X such that the following conditions are satisfied (i) PX ⊂ TX I SX (ii) The pairs {P,S} and {P,T} are weakly compatible, (iii) There exists a point qє(0,1) such that for all x,yєX and t > 0 M(Px,Py,qt) ≥ M(Sx,Ty,t)* M(Sx,Px,t)* M(Py,Ty,t)* M(Px,Ty,t)* M(Py,Sx,t) …………………(7) Then P,S and T havea unique common fixed point. Proof: Since compatible implies ows, the result follows from Theorem 3.4 Theorem 3.8 Let (X, M, *) be a complete fuzzy metric space and let P and R be self-mappings of X. Let the P and R areowc.If there exists qє(0,1) for all x,yєX and t > 0 M(Sx,Sy,qt) ≥αM(Px,Py,t)+β min{M(Px,Py,t), M(Sx,Px,t), M(Sy,Py,t), M(Sx,Py,t)} …………………(8) For all x,yϵ X where α,β> 0, α+β> 1. Then P and S have a unique common fixed point. Proof: Let the pairs {P,S} be owc, so there are points x єX such that Px = Sx. Suppose that exist another point y єX for whichPy = Sy. We claim that Sx = Sy. By inequality (8) We have M(Sx,Sy,qt) ≥αM(Px,Py,t)+ β min{M(Px,Py,t) , M(Sx,Px,t), M(Sy,Py,t), M(Sx,Py,t)} =αM(Sx,Sy,t)+ β min{M(Sx,Sy,t) , M(Sx,Sx,t), M(Sy,Sy,t), M(Sx,Sy,t)} =(α+β)M(Sx,Sy,t) A contradiction, since (α+β)> 1.Therefore Sx = Sy. Therefore Px = Py and Px is unique. From lemma2.8 , P and S have a unique fixed point. Acknowledgement: One of the author (Dr. R.K. B.) is thankful to MPCOST Bhopal for the project No 2556 References [1]P.Balasubramaniam,S.Murlisankar,R.P.Pant,”Common fixed points of four mappings in a fuzzy metric spaces”,J.Fuzzy Math. 10(2) (2002), 379-384. [2]A.George, P.Veeramani,”On some results in fuzzy metric spaces”,Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 64 (1994), 395- 399. [3]G.Jungck,”Compatible mappings and common fixed points (2)”,Internat.J.Math.Sci. (1988), 285-288. [4]G.Jungck and B.E.Rhoades,”Fixed Point Theorems for Occasionally Weakly compatible Mappings”,Fixed Point Theory, Volume 7, No. 2, 2006, 287-296. [5]O.Kramosil and J.Michalek,”Fuzzy metric and statistical metric spaces”,Kybernetika, 11 (1975), 326-334. [6]B.Schweizer and A.Sklar,”Statistical metric spaces”,Pacific J. Math.10 (1960),313-334 [7]L.A.Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform and Control 8 (1965), 338-353.
  • 5. This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage: http://www.iiste.org CALL FOR PAPERS The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/ The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors. IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar