SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN
Foundation in Natural and Built Environment (FNBE)
Effective Public Communication [COM 30103]
Assignment: Online Discussion
Assignment
To demonstrate the principles of
communication and behaviour in analyzing
interaction with others, both at individual
and at group levels.
LO
As per stated
in the module
10%
Online
Discussion
Week 4
23rd
February, 2016
INTRODUCTION
This assignment evaluates students’ academic writing skills. It also evaluates the
student’s ability to research information to support the arguments proposed in the
blog, to cite the sources of information and also to provide a list of references.
Additionally, it allows for increased feelings of ownership of knowledge and
learning that supports realistic and authentic ways to participate in learning.
Referencing:
All persons, books and other sources of information are to be referenced in accordance with the
APA Style.
OBJECTIVES OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
The objectives of this project are as follows:
• To demonstrate the principles of communication and behaviour in analysing interaction with others,
both at individual and at group levels.
LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THIS ASSIGNMENT
The learning outcomes of this assignment are:
• Apply the principles of communication and behaviour in analyzing interaction with others, both at
individual and at group levels.
• To be aware of the importance of cultural differences and respect cultural differences as well as to
build healthy and positive relationships with fellow students, co-workers and clients.
• To communicate the relevant ideas in a clear, logical and appropriate academic English.
1 | P a g e
TASKS - METHODOLOGY
Your tasks are as follows:
Assignment type : Online Discussion
Topic / Question: What is your say?
Your team has been hired as a consultant to propose a recycling center in Taman Raya, a housing
area in the heart of the city. The system that will be proposed by your committee should ease
pollution as well as provide alternative ways to promote recycling and to reduce wastage. Your task
is to come up with future solutions for recycling methods for the center. Justify your answers by
looking into the following areas according to the roles given to your team. You are required to post
messages in the discussion board provided in TiMEs. You should analyse your team member’s
messages and link them wherever possible with your answers.
Roles Duties
1. Project Manager Overseeing the team and provide suggestion where
possible.
2. Environmental engineer Suggesting ways to protect and keep the environment
clean.
3. Scientist Suggest new environmental friendly products or
inventions
4. Quantity Surveyor Financial solutions
5. Architect Advice on the construction of the center
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT
Each group will be required to conduct discussion online for three weeks. All discussion will be
done on TimES. Upon completion of the discussion, a summary of the discussion will be required
for submission.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The assessment for this assignment will be based on:
• Your demonstrated understanding of the brief.
• The content of the write-up—strength of central idea and relevance to the question.
• Clear and coherent organization of ideas and argument.
• Ability to use scholarly references to support arguments and ideas.
• Grammar and mechanics.
2 | P a g e
MARKING CRITERIA
Online Discussion Rubric:
Category 4 3 2 1 M
Quality of
information
Postings clearly
relate to the main
topic and add new
concepts, info. They
include several
supporting details
and/or examples
Postings clearly
relate to the main
topic. They
provide at least 1
supporting detail
or example.
Postings clearly
relate to the
main topic. No
details and/or
examples are
given.
Postings have
little or nothing
to do with the
main topic or
simply restate
the main
concept.
Critical
Thinking
Postings consistently
enhance the critical
thinking process
through reflection
about issues and
difference
questioning of self
and others.
Postings show
individual critical
thinking, but do
not apply
reflection and
questioning to
others’ statements.
Postings respond
to questions
from others but
do not show
reflection or
questioning of
ideas.
No response to
questions from
others.
Reference
material
Postings frequently
refer to textbook
material or other
reliable sources
(books, journal
articles, websites).
Postings show
evidence of having
read textbook,
include at least one
reference to text or
other sources.
Postings show
evidence of
having read
textbook, no
references to any
sources.
Postings include
opinions only, no
evidence of
reading any
reliable sources.
Participation Postings encourage
and facilitate
interaction among
members of the
online community.
Postings respond
to other members
of the online
community.
Postings rarely
interact with or
respond to other
members of the
online
community.
Postings respond
to the main
question of the
discussion
facilitator only.
Language Postings consistently
show appropriate
vocabulary and
writing style.
Postings usually
show appropriate
vocabulary and
writing style.
Postings often
include
inappropriate
vocabulary and
writing style.
Postings
consistently
show
inappropriate
vocabulary and
writing style.
Final Discussion Mark:
This rubric adapted from rubric developed by Amy Finch PhD and Liane Connelly PhD, RN 12/01
3 | P a g e
Fort Hays State University
SUGGESTED REFERENCES
Rueckert , R. (20120- Benefits of Academic Blogging.pdf. Retrieved on 11th
September,2012.
Scribd.Inc. Available at http://www.scribd.com/doc/100899679/Rachel-Rueckert-Benefits-of-
Academic-Blogging-pdf
Chan,D. (2012).Benefits of blogging in the classroom . Retrieved on 18th
September, 2012.
Available at http://osiriseducational.co.uk/osirisblog/benefits-of-blogging-in-the-classroom
SUGGESTED COVER PAGE / AUTHORSHIP
Should be well designed with the necessary information;
[Name / all in group]
[Id]
[Module]
[Session] January, 2016
4 | P a g e

More Related Content

DOCX
EPC final brief
PPTX
Engaging Discussion Boards
PPSX
Week2b pptslides language for research and critical reading feb2014
DOCX
Mural art assignment brief
DOC
Eng Assignment 1
PPT
Peter Manley, Liane Bryson & Maureen Sipp - Rhetoric and Writing
DOC
EPC PROJECT 2
DOC
Mural art
EPC final brief
Engaging Discussion Boards
Week2b pptslides language for research and critical reading feb2014
Mural art assignment brief
Eng Assignment 1
Peter Manley, Liane Bryson & Maureen Sipp - Rhetoric and Writing
EPC PROJECT 2
Mural art

Viewers also liked (13)

PPTX
Tutorial 2 (2)
DOCX
Business report final
PDF
Drawing module outline july 2015 (1)
DOC
Mural art assignment
DOC
Assignment 2 blog
DOC
Final project business presentation EPC
DOC
Oral presentation august2015 (1)
PPTX
Presentation1 1 (1)
PPTX
Tutorial 3 (2)
DOC
Iciassignment 1b
PDF
Project 1
PDF
Landscape project proposal
PPTX
Tutorial 6 (1)
Tutorial 2 (2)
Business report final
Drawing module outline july 2015 (1)
Mural art assignment
Assignment 2 blog
Final project business presentation EPC
Oral presentation august2015 (1)
Presentation1 1 (1)
Tutorial 3 (2)
Iciassignment 1b
Project 1
Landscape project proposal
Tutorial 6 (1)
Ad

Similar to Online discussion assignment (20)

DOCX
PDF
"Teaching is Dead!" What's your philosophy of learning?
DOCX
Unit 4 Module 4 - M4 Assignment 1 DiscussionAssignment 1 Dis.docx
PPTX
ISETL Denver 2014
DOCX
The UMUC Graduate School COMBINED Rubric for Assessing Critica.docx
PPTX
Developing Collaboration in Online Courses: A Study of Synchronous & Asynchro...
PPTX
Evaluating and Assessing Student Work
PPTX
21st c competencies
PPTX
Assessment for online discussions
DOCX
There are three components to this projectFirst, as an individual.docx
PPTX
Developing an online course on telecollaboration for teachers: A reflection o...
DOCX
Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsAdequately used dat.docx
PPTX
Creating Engaging Student Communities in the Online Classroom, Karen Lynden
PPTX
Tp tech presentation2
PDF
Syllabus_Sample (1).pdfghjjhhgggggggggggg
PDF
Syllabus_Smpl pdf is gud learning so please
PDF
Syllabus sample
PPTX
Democratizing the Discussion Board: Establishing a Community of Learners to G...
PPTX
Edu 337 Week 3 Guidance
DOCX
Assignment 2 Discussion—Technology and GlobalizationYour Module.docx
"Teaching is Dead!" What's your philosophy of learning?
Unit 4 Module 4 - M4 Assignment 1 DiscussionAssignment 1 Dis.docx
ISETL Denver 2014
The UMUC Graduate School COMBINED Rubric for Assessing Critica.docx
Developing Collaboration in Online Courses: A Study of Synchronous & Asynchro...
Evaluating and Assessing Student Work
21st c competencies
Assessment for online discussions
There are three components to this projectFirst, as an individual.docx
Developing an online course on telecollaboration for teachers: A reflection o...
Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsAdequately used dat.docx
Creating Engaging Student Communities in the Online Classroom, Karen Lynden
Tp tech presentation2
Syllabus_Sample (1).pdfghjjhhgggggggggggg
Syllabus_Smpl pdf is gud learning so please
Syllabus sample
Democratizing the Discussion Board: Establishing a Community of Learners to G...
Edu 337 Week 3 Guidance
Assignment 2 Discussion—Technology and GlobalizationYour Module.docx
Ad

More from Lam Yu (20)

PPTX
Group presentation compiled and updated 2
PDF
Lamyu column 6 f (1)
PDF
Lamyu column 1 e
PDF
Lamyu 4
PDF
Lamyu 3
PDF
Lamyu 2
PDF
Lamyu 1
PPTX
Estimating final
PPTX
Estimating presentation (final)
DOCX
Supply chain invidividual123123
DOCX
Supply chain invidividual
DOCX
Ms (1)
DOCX
Sc bim
PPTX
Bs1 (1)
PDF
Final ct aa slides
PDF
Smart tunnel
PDF
Bs finallll (1)
PDF
Site surveying-almost-1
PDF
Site surveying-2-done-1
PPTX
Pile cap
Group presentation compiled and updated 2
Lamyu column 6 f (1)
Lamyu column 1 e
Lamyu 4
Lamyu 3
Lamyu 2
Lamyu 1
Estimating final
Estimating presentation (final)
Supply chain invidividual123123
Supply chain invidividual
Ms (1)
Sc bim
Bs1 (1)
Final ct aa slides
Smart tunnel
Bs finallll (1)
Site surveying-almost-1
Site surveying-2-done-1
Pile cap

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Introduction to Building Materials
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Introduction to Building Materials
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx

Online discussion assignment

  • 1. SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING & DESIGN Foundation in Natural and Built Environment (FNBE) Effective Public Communication [COM 30103] Assignment: Online Discussion Assignment To demonstrate the principles of communication and behaviour in analyzing interaction with others, both at individual and at group levels. LO As per stated in the module 10% Online Discussion Week 4 23rd February, 2016 INTRODUCTION This assignment evaluates students’ academic writing skills. It also evaluates the student’s ability to research information to support the arguments proposed in the blog, to cite the sources of information and also to provide a list of references. Additionally, it allows for increased feelings of ownership of knowledge and learning that supports realistic and authentic ways to participate in learning. Referencing: All persons, books and other sources of information are to be referenced in accordance with the APA Style. OBJECTIVES OF THIS ASSIGNMENT The objectives of this project are as follows: • To demonstrate the principles of communication and behaviour in analysing interaction with others, both at individual and at group levels. LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THIS ASSIGNMENT The learning outcomes of this assignment are: • Apply the principles of communication and behaviour in analyzing interaction with others, both at individual and at group levels. • To be aware of the importance of cultural differences and respect cultural differences as well as to build healthy and positive relationships with fellow students, co-workers and clients. • To communicate the relevant ideas in a clear, logical and appropriate academic English. 1 | P a g e
  • 2. TASKS - METHODOLOGY Your tasks are as follows: Assignment type : Online Discussion Topic / Question: What is your say? Your team has been hired as a consultant to propose a recycling center in Taman Raya, a housing area in the heart of the city. The system that will be proposed by your committee should ease pollution as well as provide alternative ways to promote recycling and to reduce wastage. Your task is to come up with future solutions for recycling methods for the center. Justify your answers by looking into the following areas according to the roles given to your team. You are required to post messages in the discussion board provided in TiMEs. You should analyse your team member’s messages and link them wherever possible with your answers. Roles Duties 1. Project Manager Overseeing the team and provide suggestion where possible. 2. Environmental engineer Suggesting ways to protect and keep the environment clean. 3. Scientist Suggest new environmental friendly products or inventions 4. Quantity Surveyor Financial solutions 5. Architect Advice on the construction of the center SUBMISSION REQUIREMENT Each group will be required to conduct discussion online for three weeks. All discussion will be done on TimES. Upon completion of the discussion, a summary of the discussion will be required for submission. ASSESSMENT CRITERIA The assessment for this assignment will be based on: • Your demonstrated understanding of the brief. • The content of the write-up—strength of central idea and relevance to the question. • Clear and coherent organization of ideas and argument. • Ability to use scholarly references to support arguments and ideas. • Grammar and mechanics. 2 | P a g e
  • 3. MARKING CRITERIA Online Discussion Rubric: Category 4 3 2 1 M Quality of information Postings clearly relate to the main topic and add new concepts, info. They include several supporting details and/or examples Postings clearly relate to the main topic. They provide at least 1 supporting detail or example. Postings clearly relate to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. Postings have little or nothing to do with the main topic or simply restate the main concept. Critical Thinking Postings consistently enhance the critical thinking process through reflection about issues and difference questioning of self and others. Postings show individual critical thinking, but do not apply reflection and questioning to others’ statements. Postings respond to questions from others but do not show reflection or questioning of ideas. No response to questions from others. Reference material Postings frequently refer to textbook material or other reliable sources (books, journal articles, websites). Postings show evidence of having read textbook, include at least one reference to text or other sources. Postings show evidence of having read textbook, no references to any sources. Postings include opinions only, no evidence of reading any reliable sources. Participation Postings encourage and facilitate interaction among members of the online community. Postings respond to other members of the online community. Postings rarely interact with or respond to other members of the online community. Postings respond to the main question of the discussion facilitator only. Language Postings consistently show appropriate vocabulary and writing style. Postings usually show appropriate vocabulary and writing style. Postings often include inappropriate vocabulary and writing style. Postings consistently show inappropriate vocabulary and writing style. Final Discussion Mark: This rubric adapted from rubric developed by Amy Finch PhD and Liane Connelly PhD, RN 12/01 3 | P a g e
  • 4. Fort Hays State University SUGGESTED REFERENCES Rueckert , R. (20120- Benefits of Academic Blogging.pdf. Retrieved on 11th September,2012. Scribd.Inc. Available at http://www.scribd.com/doc/100899679/Rachel-Rueckert-Benefits-of- Academic-Blogging-pdf Chan,D. (2012).Benefits of blogging in the classroom . Retrieved on 18th September, 2012. Available at http://osiriseducational.co.uk/osirisblog/benefits-of-blogging-in-the-classroom SUGGESTED COVER PAGE / AUTHORSHIP Should be well designed with the necessary information; [Name / all in group] [Id] [Module] [Session] January, 2016 4 | P a g e