Open is Better
0 likes401 views
Jan H. Jensen, a computational chemist, discusses his journey towards open science practices since 2011. He advocates for open access publishing and the use of preprints, emphasizing that scientific importance can be determined by the community after publication. The document also highlights the benefits of reducing the footprint of closed science, suggesting that small changes can lead to greater openness.
Related topics:1 of 10
Downloaded 10 times
More Related Content
Similar to Open is Better (20)
Ad
More from molmodbasics (20)
Ad
Recently uploaded (20)
Open is Better
- 1. 1 Open is Better Jan H. Jensen Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen Background USA 1986 – 2006 Assoc./Professor KU 2006 - now Computational Chemist Trying to be more open since 2011 @janhjensen
- 3. 2011 2018
- 4. Papers ppt slides Live tweets Prelim Results #compchem Preprint Journal Reviews* Science CV #compchem #compchem How try to publish in 2018 #compchem #compchem *yes, I make my reviews public
- 6. The idea is that ... PLOS ONE only verifies whether experiments and data analysis were conducted rigorously, and leaves it to the scientific community to ascertain importance, post publication, through debate and comment* *https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLOS_One#Publication_concept Impact Neutrality Makes life easier Easier to start riskier projects (you will be able to publish) Easier to write impact neutral papers (just write what you found) Easier to write impact neutral manuscript reviews (and no reason not to sign them)
- 10. Jan’s FAQ