SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
Most read
3
Most read
4
Most read
Organic Field-Effect Transistors

Submitted by:
Santosh Kumar Meena
B10130
Organic Field-Effect Transistors
Introduction
Our daily life involves the continuous use of electronic devices (e.g. TV, bank cards, computer
screens, etc.). Since the invention of the first transistor in 1947 by John Bardeen, William
Shockley and Walter Brattain, the vast majority of these devices have mainly been based on
inorganic semiconductors and, in particular, on silicon. However, due to technological
limitations associated with the use of silicon, substantial efforts are currently devoted to
developing organic electronics. The processing characteristics of organic semiconductors
make them potentially useful for electronic applications where low cost, large area coverage
and structural flexibility are required. Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) also sometimes
known as organic thin-film transistors are attracting widespread interest today because of
the possibility to fabricate these with acceptable performances over large areas and on
flexible substrates using cost-effective and materials-efficient fabrication methods. These
include the well-known spin-casting technique, and also newer methods of ink-jet or other
forms of printing. Its rapid growth has been spurred primarily by the remarkable
development of new materials with improved characteristics and also advancement in the
understanding of their structure–morphology–property relations.
Field-effect transistors are the main logic units in electronic circuits, where they usually
function as either a switch or an amplifier. Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) have been
mainly based on two types of semiconductors conjugated polymers and small conjugated
molecules. The first OFET was reported in 1986 and was based on a film of electrochemically
grown polythiophene.2 Four years later, the first OFET employing a small conjugated
molecule (sexithiophene) was fabricated. The performance of OFETs in the last 20 years has
improved enormously. Nowadays, charge carrier motilities of the same order as amorphous
silicon (0.1–1𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 ) are achieved in the best OFETs. Thiophene and, especially, acene
derivatives are
Considered to be the benchmark in OFETs and most of the best motilities have been found in
these two families of compounds. However, devices prepared with these molecules are
typically prepared by evaporation of the organic materials due to their low solubility in
common organic solvents.
The main goal of this review is to give a general overview about the current standing in the
area of OFETs focusing on the new process able small molecules that have been recently
reported for their use as organic semiconductors.
Basic device structure and physics
Field-effect transistors are three-terminal devices comprising gate, source and drain
electrodes. In an OFET, an organic semiconductor is deposited to bridge the source and
drain electrodes, and is itself spaced from the gate electrode by an insulating gate dielectric
layer. The organic semiconductor can be a pi-conjugated polymer or oligomer. Important
examples include oligothiophenes and polythiophenes, and substituted pentacenes, which
can be deposited by solution-processing. This solution capability is central to the objective
to fabricate large arrays of transistors on large format and potentially flexible substrates,
for example, as required in electronic paper and posters.

Two voltages are applied relative to the source electrode which is kept at common (0 V): the
drain voltage (Vds) is applied to the drain electrode, while the gate voltage (Vgs) is applied to
the gate electrode. This gate voltage provides an electric field that leads to the accumulation
of charge carriers at the semiconductor/ dielectric interface which modulates the source-todrain conductance. Unlike traditional silicon and other doped inorganic semiconductors
which can operate in both the inversion and accumulation modes, OFETs at present typically
operate in the accumulation mode due to the difficulty to impose a stable controlled level of
background doping. Depending on whether p-channel or n-channel FET characteristics are
being measured, the Vds and Vgs are swept in the negative or positive voltages to accumulate
the appropriate sign of charge carriers at the semiconductor/ dielectric interface, i.e., holes
or electrons.
The measured field-effect characteristics of these devices can then be classified as transfer
characteristics (Fig. 1a) and output characteristics (Fig. 1b) depending on whether Vgs is
varied while Vds is kept constant, or Vds is varied while Vgs is kept constant. These
characteristics are typically measured on a semiconductor parameter analyser, and
sometimes as a function of temperature to understand the underlying physics. For research
devices fabricated on 200-nm-thick thermal oxide on doped silicon substrate as the gate
electrode, Vgs can be routinely applied up to 60 V without gate dielectric breakdown. These
voltages can be downscaled to a few volts by using thinner insulators and by operating at
lower currents.
In the transfer curves (a) as the magnitude of Vgs increases for a given Vds, the source–drain
current at first increases quadratically with Vgs beyond a threshold voltage, and then quasilinearly with Vgs as Vgs becomes larger than Vds. In this Vgs > Vds regime, the linear-regime
field-effect mobility (mFET) can be evaluated using a standard equation from silicon metaloxide-semiconductor FET theory.

In the output curves (b) as the magnitude of Vds increases for a given Vgs, the source–drain
current at first increases linearly with Vds, and then levels off, i.e. saturates, as Vds becomes
larger than Vgs. In this Vds > Vgs regime, the saturation mFET can similarly be evaluated.
These two mFET values can differ somewhat depending on the quality of the device
characteristics. Furthermore, it is well appreciated now that these values can also depend
strongly on the dielectric interface and the organic semiconductor morphology at this
interface (varying by more than a factor of ten). Furthermore, they can vary with Vgs and
temperature, and can be degraded by contact resistance. Nevertheless, these mFET values
are still useful indicators of the performance of the organic semiconductor in particular
device configurations.
There are two common device configurations used in OFETs
1. Top contact
2. Bottom contact

Top contact: When the source and drain electrodes are evaporated on the top of the organic
material.

Bottom contact: When the source and drain electrodes are evaporated on the dielectric
before depositing the organic semiconductor.
Organic semiconductors
As mentioned before, polymers and small conjugated molecules are the two families of
organic semiconductors that have been studied. Typically, solution processed polymers form
complex microstructures, where microcrystalline domains are embedded in an amorphous
matrix. The disordered matrix limits the charge transport resulting in low field-effect
nobilities. The most studied polymer for OFETs is poly (3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), which has
reported to have an OFET mobility of 0.1 𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 this high mobility is related to structural
order in the polymer film induced by the regioregular head-to-tail coupling of the hexyl side
chains.
P-Type semiconductors
P-Type semiconductors are materials in which the majority of carriers are holes. As stated
before, the most studied materials for OFETs have been acene and thiophene derivatives.
Field effect hole motilities of 1.1 and 3 𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 have been reported for thin films of alkylsubstituted oligothiophene and pentacene respectively. Also, promising organic
semiconductors based on p-extended heteroarenes have resulted in high nobilities between
2.1 and 2.9𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 .
Examples:
N-Type semiconductors
In n-type semiconductors the majority of carriers are electrons. The development in devices
using these semiconductors is still far from the performance achieved with p-type materials
due to the fact that the transport in n-channel conductors is degraded easily by air, which
acts as electron traps together with the dielectric surface trapping sites, and that most of the
known organic materials tend to conduct holes better than electrons. An added difficulty in
progressing on the fabrication of electron conducting OFETs is finding suitable metals for
contacts. Typically, the metal used in OFETs is gold, which has a work function of 5.1 eV close
to the ionization potential suitable metal for injecting holes into the HOMO of most organic
materials that behave as p-semiconductors. However, to inject electrons to the LUMO of ntype organic semiconductors it is more appropriate to employ metals with low work
functions, such as Al, Ca or Mg. The drawback is that these metals tend to oxidize easily.
Examples:
Best Example of Organic Material
Organic Molecule – Pentacene

Pentacene Molecule
 Organic semiconductor
 Composed of five Benzene rings
 Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbon
 Easy to synthesize
 High carrier mobility

Pentacene mobility v/s other organics
Conclusions
OFET performances of the same order as amorphous silicon are currently achieved. However,
there are still many questions, such as understanding the charge transport mechanisms and
the relation structure–mobility, that remain open and which should be addressed to further
progress in the field. Finding materials for n-type and ambipolar devices will be also
fundamental for the future design of complementary circuits. Finally, if low-cost, flexible and
large area-coverage devices are to be realized with organic semiconductors, it is imperative
to search for materials with high charge carrier mobility that can be soluble processed, as
well as solution-based techniques which allow the preparation of reproducible devices. In
conclusion, although there is a lot of work to be done, OFETs promise to be tremendously
important for future applications in areas where electronics meets with information
technology, biomedicine or optics.

References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

P. T. Herwig and K. Mu¨ llen, Adv. Mater., 1999, 11, 480.
G. Horowitz, D. Fichou, X. Z. Peng, Z. G. Xu and F. Garnier,Solid State Commun., 1989.
S. Aramaki, Y. Sakai and N. Ono, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 84,2085.
D. A. da Silva Filho, E.-G. Kim, J.-L. Bredas, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 1072.
D. Natali, L. Fumagalli, M. Sampietro, J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 014501.
J. Veres, S. Ogier, G. Lloyd, Chem. Mat. 2004, 16, 4543.

More Related Content

PPTX
Organic Field Effect Transistor
PDF
Organic Semiconductor Technology
PPTX
Organic Thin film transistors
PDF
Organic Semiconductor Optoelectronics.
PPT
Mobility
PPT
Semiconductor
PPT
Semiconductors
Organic Field Effect Transistor
Organic Semiconductor Technology
Organic Thin film transistors
Organic Semiconductor Optoelectronics.
Mobility
Semiconductor
Semiconductors

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Organic transistors presentation for Graduate Course.
PPTX
Molecular Beam Epitaxy-MBE---ABU SYED KUET
PPT
Organic transistors
PPTX
Epitaxy growth
PPTX
Pulse laser deposition of thin film
PPTX
Electron beam lithography
PPTX
josphenson junction
PPT
flexible electronics
PDF
OFET sensors
PPTX
X-ray lithography
PPT
Introduction organic electronics
PPTX
Flexible Electronics PPT by Sourabh Kumar
PPTX
Molecular electronic devices
PPTX
ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
PPTX
2 d materials
PPTX
PHOTONIC DEVICES INTRODUCTION
PDF
Introduction to nanophotonics
PPTX
Quantum Tunnelling
PPTX
Organic Semiconductor
PDF
X rays lithography
Organic transistors presentation for Graduate Course.
Molecular Beam Epitaxy-MBE---ABU SYED KUET
Organic transistors
Epitaxy growth
Pulse laser deposition of thin film
Electron beam lithography
josphenson junction
flexible electronics
OFET sensors
X-ray lithography
Introduction organic electronics
Flexible Electronics PPT by Sourabh Kumar
Molecular electronic devices
ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
2 d materials
PHOTONIC DEVICES INTRODUCTION
Introduction to nanophotonics
Quantum Tunnelling
Organic Semiconductor
X rays lithography
Ad

Viewers also liked (7)

PPT
Polymer structures
PPTX
Polymer conformation & chain dimension
PDF
Chapter 15 Polymers
PPTX
Polymer properties and characterisation
PPTX
Structure of polymer chains
PPT
Polymer Course
Polymer structures
Polymer conformation & chain dimension
Chapter 15 Polymers
Polymer properties and characterisation
Structure of polymer chains
Polymer Course
Ad

Similar to Organic Field Effect Transistor (20)

PDF
Comparative Study of Materials for Low Voltage Organic and Inorganic Dielectr...
PDF
C2CP41712J.pdf
PDF
OFET Preparation by Lithography and Thin Film Depositions Process
PDF
ASP-Lecture-KadriDiallo.pdf
PDF
Sub Ten Micron Channel Devices Achieved by Vertical Organic Thin Film Transis...
PDF
SUB TEN MICRON CHANNEL DEVICES ACHIEVED BY VERTICAL ORGANIC THIN FILM TRANSI...
PDF
Interface Engineering In Organic Fieldeffect Transistors Xuefeng Guo
PDF
1st paper
PDF
Physics of Organic Semiconductors Second Edition Wolfgang Brütting
PPTX
Organic electronic
PPTX
final-170505144808 (1).pptcsssssssdddddjjx
PDF
Physics of Organic Semiconductors Second Edition Wolfgang Brütting
PDF
Pentacene-Based Organic Field-Effect Transistors: Analytical Model and Simula...
PDF
SmartKem : Organic Semiconductors for Flexible Displays
PPTX
Organic electronics
PDF
Pentacene organic thin-film transistors on flexible paper and glass substrates
PPTX
Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Field-Effect Transistor its importance FET
PDF
Iontronics Ionic Carriers In Organic Electronic Materials And Devices 1st Edi...
PPT
Ppt presentation on FET
Comparative Study of Materials for Low Voltage Organic and Inorganic Dielectr...
C2CP41712J.pdf
OFET Preparation by Lithography and Thin Film Depositions Process
ASP-Lecture-KadriDiallo.pdf
Sub Ten Micron Channel Devices Achieved by Vertical Organic Thin Film Transis...
SUB TEN MICRON CHANNEL DEVICES ACHIEVED BY VERTICAL ORGANIC THIN FILM TRANSI...
Interface Engineering In Organic Fieldeffect Transistors Xuefeng Guo
1st paper
Physics of Organic Semiconductors Second Edition Wolfgang Brütting
Organic electronic
final-170505144808 (1).pptcsssssssdddddjjx
Physics of Organic Semiconductors Second Edition Wolfgang Brütting
Pentacene-Based Organic Field-Effect Transistors: Analytical Model and Simula...
SmartKem : Organic Semiconductors for Flexible Displays
Organic electronics
Pentacene organic thin-film transistors on flexible paper and glass substrates
Presentation.pptx
Field-Effect Transistor its importance FET
Iontronics Ionic Carriers In Organic Electronic Materials And Devices 1st Edi...
Ppt presentation on FET

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PPTX
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
PPTX
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PPTX
Lesson notes of climatology university.
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
Introduction to Building Materials
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PPTX
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Unit 4 Skeletal System.ppt.pptxopresentatiom
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
Lesson notes of climatology university.
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
Indian roads congress 037 - 2012 Flexible pavement
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
Introduction to Building Materials
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
UNIT III MENTAL HEALTH NURSING ASSESSMENT
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming

Organic Field Effect Transistor

  • 1. Organic Field-Effect Transistors Submitted by: Santosh Kumar Meena B10130
  • 2. Organic Field-Effect Transistors Introduction Our daily life involves the continuous use of electronic devices (e.g. TV, bank cards, computer screens, etc.). Since the invention of the first transistor in 1947 by John Bardeen, William Shockley and Walter Brattain, the vast majority of these devices have mainly been based on inorganic semiconductors and, in particular, on silicon. However, due to technological limitations associated with the use of silicon, substantial efforts are currently devoted to developing organic electronics. The processing characteristics of organic semiconductors make them potentially useful for electronic applications where low cost, large area coverage and structural flexibility are required. Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) also sometimes known as organic thin-film transistors are attracting widespread interest today because of the possibility to fabricate these with acceptable performances over large areas and on flexible substrates using cost-effective and materials-efficient fabrication methods. These include the well-known spin-casting technique, and also newer methods of ink-jet or other forms of printing. Its rapid growth has been spurred primarily by the remarkable development of new materials with improved characteristics and also advancement in the understanding of their structure–morphology–property relations. Field-effect transistors are the main logic units in electronic circuits, where they usually function as either a switch or an amplifier. Organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) have been mainly based on two types of semiconductors conjugated polymers and small conjugated molecules. The first OFET was reported in 1986 and was based on a film of electrochemically grown polythiophene.2 Four years later, the first OFET employing a small conjugated molecule (sexithiophene) was fabricated. The performance of OFETs in the last 20 years has improved enormously. Nowadays, charge carrier motilities of the same order as amorphous silicon (0.1–1𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 ) are achieved in the best OFETs. Thiophene and, especially, acene derivatives are Considered to be the benchmark in OFETs and most of the best motilities have been found in these two families of compounds. However, devices prepared with these molecules are typically prepared by evaporation of the organic materials due to their low solubility in common organic solvents. The main goal of this review is to give a general overview about the current standing in the area of OFETs focusing on the new process able small molecules that have been recently reported for their use as organic semiconductors.
  • 3. Basic device structure and physics Field-effect transistors are three-terminal devices comprising gate, source and drain electrodes. In an OFET, an organic semiconductor is deposited to bridge the source and drain electrodes, and is itself spaced from the gate electrode by an insulating gate dielectric layer. The organic semiconductor can be a pi-conjugated polymer or oligomer. Important examples include oligothiophenes and polythiophenes, and substituted pentacenes, which can be deposited by solution-processing. This solution capability is central to the objective to fabricate large arrays of transistors on large format and potentially flexible substrates, for example, as required in electronic paper and posters. Two voltages are applied relative to the source electrode which is kept at common (0 V): the drain voltage (Vds) is applied to the drain electrode, while the gate voltage (Vgs) is applied to the gate electrode. This gate voltage provides an electric field that leads to the accumulation of charge carriers at the semiconductor/ dielectric interface which modulates the source-todrain conductance. Unlike traditional silicon and other doped inorganic semiconductors which can operate in both the inversion and accumulation modes, OFETs at present typically operate in the accumulation mode due to the difficulty to impose a stable controlled level of background doping. Depending on whether p-channel or n-channel FET characteristics are being measured, the Vds and Vgs are swept in the negative or positive voltages to accumulate the appropriate sign of charge carriers at the semiconductor/ dielectric interface, i.e., holes or electrons. The measured field-effect characteristics of these devices can then be classified as transfer characteristics (Fig. 1a) and output characteristics (Fig. 1b) depending on whether Vgs is varied while Vds is kept constant, or Vds is varied while Vgs is kept constant. These characteristics are typically measured on a semiconductor parameter analyser, and sometimes as a function of temperature to understand the underlying physics. For research devices fabricated on 200-nm-thick thermal oxide on doped silicon substrate as the gate electrode, Vgs can be routinely applied up to 60 V without gate dielectric breakdown. These
  • 4. voltages can be downscaled to a few volts by using thinner insulators and by operating at lower currents. In the transfer curves (a) as the magnitude of Vgs increases for a given Vds, the source–drain current at first increases quadratically with Vgs beyond a threshold voltage, and then quasilinearly with Vgs as Vgs becomes larger than Vds. In this Vgs > Vds regime, the linear-regime field-effect mobility (mFET) can be evaluated using a standard equation from silicon metaloxide-semiconductor FET theory. In the output curves (b) as the magnitude of Vds increases for a given Vgs, the source–drain current at first increases linearly with Vds, and then levels off, i.e. saturates, as Vds becomes larger than Vgs. In this Vds > Vgs regime, the saturation mFET can similarly be evaluated.
  • 5. These two mFET values can differ somewhat depending on the quality of the device characteristics. Furthermore, it is well appreciated now that these values can also depend strongly on the dielectric interface and the organic semiconductor morphology at this interface (varying by more than a factor of ten). Furthermore, they can vary with Vgs and temperature, and can be degraded by contact resistance. Nevertheless, these mFET values are still useful indicators of the performance of the organic semiconductor in particular device configurations. There are two common device configurations used in OFETs 1. Top contact 2. Bottom contact Top contact: When the source and drain electrodes are evaporated on the top of the organic material. Bottom contact: When the source and drain electrodes are evaporated on the dielectric before depositing the organic semiconductor.
  • 6. Organic semiconductors As mentioned before, polymers and small conjugated molecules are the two families of organic semiconductors that have been studied. Typically, solution processed polymers form complex microstructures, where microcrystalline domains are embedded in an amorphous matrix. The disordered matrix limits the charge transport resulting in low field-effect nobilities. The most studied polymer for OFETs is poly (3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), which has reported to have an OFET mobility of 0.1 𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 this high mobility is related to structural order in the polymer film induced by the regioregular head-to-tail coupling of the hexyl side chains. P-Type semiconductors P-Type semiconductors are materials in which the majority of carriers are holes. As stated before, the most studied materials for OFETs have been acene and thiophene derivatives. Field effect hole motilities of 1.1 and 3 𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 have been reported for thin films of alkylsubstituted oligothiophene and pentacene respectively. Also, promising organic semiconductors based on p-extended heteroarenes have resulted in high nobilities between 2.1 and 2.9𝑐𝑚2 𝑉 −1 𝑠 −1 . Examples:
  • 7. N-Type semiconductors In n-type semiconductors the majority of carriers are electrons. The development in devices using these semiconductors is still far from the performance achieved with p-type materials due to the fact that the transport in n-channel conductors is degraded easily by air, which acts as electron traps together with the dielectric surface trapping sites, and that most of the known organic materials tend to conduct holes better than electrons. An added difficulty in progressing on the fabrication of electron conducting OFETs is finding suitable metals for contacts. Typically, the metal used in OFETs is gold, which has a work function of 5.1 eV close to the ionization potential suitable metal for injecting holes into the HOMO of most organic materials that behave as p-semiconductors. However, to inject electrons to the LUMO of ntype organic semiconductors it is more appropriate to employ metals with low work functions, such as Al, Ca or Mg. The drawback is that these metals tend to oxidize easily. Examples:
  • 8. Best Example of Organic Material Organic Molecule – Pentacene Pentacene Molecule  Organic semiconductor  Composed of five Benzene rings  Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbon  Easy to synthesize  High carrier mobility Pentacene mobility v/s other organics
  • 9. Conclusions OFET performances of the same order as amorphous silicon are currently achieved. However, there are still many questions, such as understanding the charge transport mechanisms and the relation structure–mobility, that remain open and which should be addressed to further progress in the field. Finding materials for n-type and ambipolar devices will be also fundamental for the future design of complementary circuits. Finally, if low-cost, flexible and large area-coverage devices are to be realized with organic semiconductors, it is imperative to search for materials with high charge carrier mobility that can be soluble processed, as well as solution-based techniques which allow the preparation of reproducible devices. In conclusion, although there is a lot of work to be done, OFETs promise to be tremendously important for future applications in areas where electronics meets with information technology, biomedicine or optics. References 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. P. T. Herwig and K. Mu¨ llen, Adv. Mater., 1999, 11, 480. G. Horowitz, D. Fichou, X. Z. Peng, Z. G. Xu and F. Garnier,Solid State Commun., 1989. S. Aramaki, Y. Sakai and N. Ono, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 84,2085. D. A. da Silva Filho, E.-G. Kim, J.-L. Bredas, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 1072. D. Natali, L. Fumagalli, M. Sampietro, J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 014501. J. Veres, S. Ogier, G. Lloyd, Chem. Mat. 2004, 16, 4543.