SlideShare a Scribd company logo
AT Bootcamp

Overview   ATIA 2013
           Behnke, Marotta & Wojcik
Learning Objectives
1. Gain an overview of areas of assistive
  technology applications and processes that
  surround good implementation practices.
2. Explore through hands-on activities and
  real-world scenarios, an array of assistive
  technology tools that could meet the needs
  of persons with disabilities.
3. Build personal learning networks through
  information resources and interpersonal
  connections.
Best learning practices include…
   Ways to provide interaction, engagement, &
    expression…
    ◦ Wikispace – ATBootcamp.wikispaces.com
    ◦ Back Channel – todaysmeet.com/atia
    ◦ Live Binder - http://bit.ly/atbootcamp
 Building flexibility for your learning
 BYOD
Try it out! Use a tool
to comment, explore
or post a resource.      Individual Activity #1
Agenda for Overview
   Overview
   Introductions
   AT Cycle overview
   QIAT
   SETT
   Universal Design
   Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
   Resources
   Conference sessions
Introductions
 Mike             Participants
 Kirk              ◦ Introduce your session
                      partner
 Brian
                    ◦ Name
                    ◦ Affiliation
                    ◦ Location
                    ◦ Expectations for the
                      next two-days
                    ◦ Dream vacation
AT Cycle       Consideration


 Monitoring




                       Provision
Implementation
CONSIDERATION OF AT
AT Consideration
   Section 300.324(a)(2)(v) of the IDEA 2004 regulations states that
    IEP teams must “consider whether the child needs AT devices and
    services” when developing a student’s IEP
   The AT consideration is a purposeful process that involves
     ◦ collaborative decision making,
     ◦ reviewing existing information about a student,
     ◦ potentially collecting additional information about a student,
     ◦ deciding whether or not a student needs AT, and,
     ◦ ultimately, if a student does need AT, identifying the AT needed
       for a student to receive a FAPE.
   The onus for AT consideration falls upon the entire IEP team and is
    not relegated to an individual or an outside evaluator
AT Bootcamp - Overview
   Student (Person) – Information specifically related to the
    student

   Environment – Information related to anything or anyone
    around the student in places where the technology is
    expected to be used

   Task – Information about what exactly happens in the
    environment – educational tasks the student needs to
    complete

   Tool – Information about what types of tools could be used
    to address the students’ needs, in the environment for a
    specific task                                            11
   Promotes team building for consensus
   Provides for the collection of data
   As environments and tasks are explored, links
    between assessment and intervention become
    strong and clear
   Identify roles and responsibilities of team
    members
   Implementation of technology
   An array of technology options (no, low & high)
   QIAT (Quality indicators in Assistive Technology)

                                                        12
Reference: http://joyzabala.com   13
AT Consideration vs. AT Evaluation

    AT Consideration                   AT Evaluation
   Brief discussion that           Process for collecting
    determines need for AT           additional data about an
   Should consider existing         individual
    data about the individual       May involve:
    and determine if more data       ◦ Task Demand Analysis
    is needed                        ◦ Feature Match Analysis
                                     ◦ Tool Demand Analysis
                                     ◦ AT Trials and Data Collection
PROVISION OF AT
Who Funds AT?
Who Owns that AT?
AT IMPLEMENTATION
AT Implementation

                   On
 What             What?
Happens                                  When?
  if?



                    AT
Care?          Implementation              How?




     With                       Where?
    Relation
      To?
PERFORMANCE
MONITORING OF AT USE
Why Performance Monitoring of AT
Use?
AT, like any other intervention, needs to be
monitored to ensure that the intervention
is working in the way that it is intended.
The goal of monitoring an individuals's
performance while using AT is to
determine whether the AT continues to be
needed and/or whether the AT continues
to be meeting the needs of a student.
Time Series Concurrent Differential
Approach (Smith, 2000)
Measurement Questions
 On what tasks will the student be
  using the AT?
 What is the behavior to measure?
 What is the unit of measurement?
 What is the frequency of
  measurement?
Developing the Variable to Measure



   Behavior (Observable, Measureable)

      Some Common Denominator
Progress Monitoring AT Use
 Is the AT still needed?
 Is the AT still working?
 Are there any anomalies or
 concerns? Are the
 anomalies/concerns explainable or
 acceptable?
AT Bootcamp - Overview
Consideration of AT Needs
   Assessment of AT Needs
          AT in the IEP
      AT Implementation
Evaluation of Effectiveness of AT
         AT in Transition
 Administrative Support for AT
 AT Professional Development
AT Bootcamp - Overview
Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
     UDL is…is a set of principles for curriculum
      development that give all individuals equal
      opportunities to learn

     UDL provides a blueprint for creating
      instructional goals, methods, materials, and
      assessments that work for everyone

     not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but
      rather flexible approaches that can be
      customized and adjusted for individual
      educational needs
Principles
      Recognition Strategic Affective
                                        http://www.udlcenter
                                        .org/aboutudl/udlgui
                                        delines


                                           Guidelines


                            Checkpoints


  Goals
UDL Curriculum: Goals
 Learning expectations
 Knowledge, concepts, and skills all
  students should master
 Generally aligned to standards
 Designed to offer options—varied
  pathways, tools, strategies, and
  scaffolds for reaching mastery
 Do Not prescribe the methods and
  materials

               (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
Learning Goals: Differences
    Traditional                  UDL

   Describes learning        Describes learning
    expectations               expectations
   Do not generally          Written to acknowledge
    consider learner           learner variability
    variability               Differentiates from the
   Do not generally           means
    differentiate from the    Offers more options
    means
                              Focus on developing
   Often limit options        “expert learners”
UDL Curriculum: Materials

 Media used to present
   learning content
 What the learner uses to
  demonstrate knowledge
 Materials are variable and flexible
 Multiple media and embedded, just-
  in-time supports


              (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
UDL Curriculum: Methods
 Instructional
  decisions, approaches, procedures, o
  r routines used to accelerate or
  enhance learning
 Evidence-based methods and
  differentiated methods
 Are adjusted based on continual
  monitoring of learner progress


               (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
UDL Curriculum: Assessments
 Process of gathering
  information about a learner’s
  performance
 Uses a variety of methods and
  materials
 Used to determine learners’
  knowledge, skills, and motivation
 Purpose is to make informed
  educational decisions

               (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
Assistive Technology vs. Educational
Technology vs. Instructional
Technology vs. Accommodations….
        So why do we need this information?
        Why is it important to us as newbies
         in the field of assistive technology?
        Where are we heading as a society
         with the integration of technologies?
        Are you a digital immigrant or a digital
         native?
Make a visual display in your notes
to help you align what is Universal
Design and UDL and why it is so
important to consider in the field
of assistive technology? Explain this
to a fellow learner.                    Group Activity #2

More Related Content

PPT
Assessment Issues AT for LD
PPTX
Edu614 session 7 spring 14 AT & iPad
DOC
E-learning and critical thinking
PPTX
A Design Methodology for Learning Analytics Information Systems HICSS 2020 An...
PPTX
ATCNE QIAT Presentation
PPTX
Assistive Technology Assessment
PPTX
Developing tools to facilitate integrated reflection
PPTX
Assistive technology in the classroom - C. Beyer
Assessment Issues AT for LD
Edu614 session 7 spring 14 AT & iPad
E-learning and critical thinking
A Design Methodology for Learning Analytics Information Systems HICSS 2020 An...
ATCNE QIAT Presentation
Assistive Technology Assessment
Developing tools to facilitate integrated reflection
Assistive technology in the classroom - C. Beyer

What's hot (19)

PPTX
Analytics Goes to College: Better Schooling Through Information Technology wi...
PPT
Trends Presentation V7
PPTX
UDL Presentation: Sharing Ideas and Building Resources
PDF
Wosa -outcome-based-learning-sgd
PPTX
Assistive Technology Web Quest
PDF
Scm deshmukh-siom-11-aug-2016
PPTX
MOOCs and Higher Education
PDF
Big Data and Student Retention
PPTX
Assistive technology nguyen
PPTX
Assistive Technology Nguyen
PPTX
Assistive Technology
PPTX
Learner engagement
PDF
Lak20 drill down recommendation
PPTX
Open 2013: Best Practices to Evaluate Student-led Design Projects for Global...
PPTX
Ngl2012 ossiannlisson etal120219
DOC
Pedagogical Models And Their Use In Elearning 20100304
PPTX
Bhat slide show
PPTX
Learning Analytics 101
PPTX
Assistive technology nguyen
Analytics Goes to College: Better Schooling Through Information Technology wi...
Trends Presentation V7
UDL Presentation: Sharing Ideas and Building Resources
Wosa -outcome-based-learning-sgd
Assistive Technology Web Quest
Scm deshmukh-siom-11-aug-2016
MOOCs and Higher Education
Big Data and Student Retention
Assistive technology nguyen
Assistive Technology Nguyen
Assistive Technology
Learner engagement
Lak20 drill down recommendation
Open 2013: Best Practices to Evaluate Student-led Design Projects for Global...
Ngl2012 ossiannlisson etal120219
Pedagogical Models And Their Use In Elearning 20100304
Bhat slide show
Learning Analytics 101
Assistive technology nguyen
Ad

Viewers also liked (6)

PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Literacy
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Mobile Tech
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Policy
PPTX
Tech bootcamp slides
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Implementation
PDF
Advertising Industry Overview
AT Bootcamp - Literacy
AT Bootcamp - Mobile Tech
AT Bootcamp - Policy
Tech bootcamp slides
AT Bootcamp - Implementation
Advertising Industry Overview
Ad

Similar to AT Bootcamp - Overview (20)

PPT
Assistive Technology in the Lakeland Central School District
PDF
UDL + Technology Teams = Success for All Students
PPTX
AT for Paraprofessionals whats my role?
PDF
Universal Design for Learning + Technology Teams = Success for All Students 1...
PPTX
Assistive technology presentation
PPT
Assessment models assistive technology
PPTX
Differentiated instruction and technology
PPT
Assessment Process
PPT
Class worksintroobjectivestransitions
PPTX
2012100608102620111014181047 kuliah2kpt6043
PPTX
Designing and Planning Technology Enhanced Instruction
PPTX
Arra 2009 Webinar
PPTX
Customizing student learning
PPTX
UDL Presentation
PPTX
Sacred Heart University Universal Design for Learning
PPTX
Alternative Professional Development at ATIA 2010
PDF
3ContextAnalysis.pdf
PPTX
Universal Design August Workshop
PPTX
Alternative Professional Development
PPTX
Customizing student learning activities
Assistive Technology in the Lakeland Central School District
UDL + Technology Teams = Success for All Students
AT for Paraprofessionals whats my role?
Universal Design for Learning + Technology Teams = Success for All Students 1...
Assistive technology presentation
Assessment models assistive technology
Differentiated instruction and technology
Assessment Process
Class worksintroobjectivestransitions
2012100608102620111014181047 kuliah2kpt6043
Designing and Planning Technology Enhanced Instruction
Arra 2009 Webinar
Customizing student learning
UDL Presentation
Sacred Heart University Universal Design for Learning
Alternative Professional Development at ATIA 2010
3ContextAnalysis.pdf
Universal Design August Workshop
Alternative Professional Development
Customizing student learning activities

More from ATBootcamp (7)

PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Sensory
PPTX
At bootcamp template
PPTX
App slides at bootcamp
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - AIM
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Access
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - AAC
PPTX
AT Bootcamp - Positioning
AT Bootcamp - Sensory
At bootcamp template
App slides at bootcamp
AT Bootcamp - AIM
AT Bootcamp - Access
AT Bootcamp - AAC
AT Bootcamp - Positioning

AT Bootcamp - Overview

  • 1. AT Bootcamp Overview ATIA 2013 Behnke, Marotta & Wojcik
  • 2. Learning Objectives 1. Gain an overview of areas of assistive technology applications and processes that surround good implementation practices. 2. Explore through hands-on activities and real-world scenarios, an array of assistive technology tools that could meet the needs of persons with disabilities. 3. Build personal learning networks through information resources and interpersonal connections.
  • 3. Best learning practices include…  Ways to provide interaction, engagement, & expression… ◦ Wikispace – ATBootcamp.wikispaces.com ◦ Back Channel – todaysmeet.com/atia ◦ Live Binder - http://bit.ly/atbootcamp  Building flexibility for your learning  BYOD
  • 4. Try it out! Use a tool to comment, explore or post a resource. Individual Activity #1
  • 5. Agenda for Overview  Overview  Introductions  AT Cycle overview  QIAT  SETT  Universal Design  Universal Design for Learning (UDL)  Resources  Conference sessions
  • 6. Introductions  Mike  Participants  Kirk ◦ Introduce your session partner  Brian ◦ Name ◦ Affiliation ◦ Location ◦ Expectations for the next two-days ◦ Dream vacation
  • 7. AT Cycle Consideration Monitoring Provision Implementation
  • 9. AT Consideration  Section 300.324(a)(2)(v) of the IDEA 2004 regulations states that IEP teams must “consider whether the child needs AT devices and services” when developing a student’s IEP  The AT consideration is a purposeful process that involves ◦ collaborative decision making, ◦ reviewing existing information about a student, ◦ potentially collecting additional information about a student, ◦ deciding whether or not a student needs AT, and, ◦ ultimately, if a student does need AT, identifying the AT needed for a student to receive a FAPE.  The onus for AT consideration falls upon the entire IEP team and is not relegated to an individual or an outside evaluator
  • 11. Student (Person) – Information specifically related to the student  Environment – Information related to anything or anyone around the student in places where the technology is expected to be used  Task – Information about what exactly happens in the environment – educational tasks the student needs to complete  Tool – Information about what types of tools could be used to address the students’ needs, in the environment for a specific task 11
  • 12. Promotes team building for consensus  Provides for the collection of data  As environments and tasks are explored, links between assessment and intervention become strong and clear  Identify roles and responsibilities of team members  Implementation of technology  An array of technology options (no, low & high)  QIAT (Quality indicators in Assistive Technology) 12
  • 14. AT Consideration vs. AT Evaluation AT Consideration AT Evaluation  Brief discussion that  Process for collecting determines need for AT additional data about an  Should consider existing individual data about the individual  May involve: and determine if more data ◦ Task Demand Analysis is needed ◦ Feature Match Analysis ◦ Tool Demand Analysis ◦ AT Trials and Data Collection
  • 19. AT Implementation On What What? Happens When? if? AT Care? Implementation How? With Where? Relation To?
  • 21. Why Performance Monitoring of AT Use? AT, like any other intervention, needs to be monitored to ensure that the intervention is working in the way that it is intended. The goal of monitoring an individuals's performance while using AT is to determine whether the AT continues to be needed and/or whether the AT continues to be meeting the needs of a student.
  • 22. Time Series Concurrent Differential Approach (Smith, 2000)
  • 23. Measurement Questions  On what tasks will the student be using the AT?  What is the behavior to measure?  What is the unit of measurement?  What is the frequency of measurement?
  • 24. Developing the Variable to Measure Behavior (Observable, Measureable) Some Common Denominator
  • 25. Progress Monitoring AT Use  Is the AT still needed?  Is the AT still working?  Are there any anomalies or concerns? Are the anomalies/concerns explainable or acceptable?
  • 27. Consideration of AT Needs Assessment of AT Needs AT in the IEP AT Implementation Evaluation of Effectiveness of AT AT in Transition Administrative Support for AT AT Professional Development
  • 29. Universal Design for Learning (UDL)  UDL is…is a set of principles for curriculum development that give all individuals equal opportunities to learn  UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone  not a single, one-size-fits-all solution but rather flexible approaches that can be customized and adjusted for individual educational needs
  • 30. Principles Recognition Strategic Affective http://www.udlcenter .org/aboutudl/udlgui delines Guidelines Checkpoints Goals
  • 31. UDL Curriculum: Goals  Learning expectations  Knowledge, concepts, and skills all students should master  Generally aligned to standards  Designed to offer options—varied pathways, tools, strategies, and scaffolds for reaching mastery  Do Not prescribe the methods and materials (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
  • 32. Learning Goals: Differences Traditional UDL  Describes learning  Describes learning expectations expectations  Do not generally  Written to acknowledge consider learner learner variability variability  Differentiates from the  Do not generally means differentiate from the  Offers more options means  Focus on developing  Often limit options “expert learners”
  • 33. UDL Curriculum: Materials  Media used to present learning content  What the learner uses to demonstrate knowledge  Materials are variable and flexible  Multiple media and embedded, just- in-time supports (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
  • 34. UDL Curriculum: Methods  Instructional decisions, approaches, procedures, o r routines used to accelerate or enhance learning  Evidence-based methods and differentiated methods  Are adjusted based on continual monitoring of learner progress (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
  • 35. UDL Curriculum: Assessments  Process of gathering information about a learner’s performance  Uses a variety of methods and materials  Used to determine learners’ knowledge, skills, and motivation  Purpose is to make informed educational decisions (National Center on UDL at CAST, 2012)
  • 36. Assistive Technology vs. Educational Technology vs. Instructional Technology vs. Accommodations….  So why do we need this information?  Why is it important to us as newbies in the field of assistive technology?  Where are we heading as a society with the integration of technologies?  Are you a digital immigrant or a digital native?
  • 37. Make a visual display in your notes to help you align what is Universal Design and UDL and why it is so important to consider in the field of assistive technology? Explain this to a fellow learner. Group Activity #2

Editor's Notes

  • #5: Using at least one of the tools explained in the previous slide, explore the possibilities and resources that a digital environment can afford for persons with disabilities and why could it be an accommodation? Post it on the todaysmeet site.
  • #34: Ask ParticipantsHow do you think the Universal Design principles for architecture might translate into the classroom?
  • #36: Describe how to read guidelines (i.e. Principles, Guidelines, Checkpoints and the ultimate goals of each of the Principles), aligned to the three brain networksPresenter access guidelines and model how to read/use the guidelines.
  • #37: National Center on Universal Design for Learning at CAST (2012). UDL and the curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlcurriculumGoals Within the UDL framework, goals themselves are articulated in a way that acknowledges learner variability and differentiates goals from means. Traditional goals prescribe the methods and materials needed to achieve the goal (i.e. Read a chapter about photosynthesis), UDL goals are designed to offer options and alternatives—varied pathways, tools, strategies, and scaffolds for reaching mastery.  They do not prescribe the methods and materials.
  • #38: “Expert Learner” = Expert learners have developed three broad characteristics. They are:  a) strategic, skillful and goal directed; b) knowledgeable, and c) purposeful and motivated to learn more
  • #39: National Center on Universal Design for Learning at CAST (2012). UDL and the curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlcurriculumMaterialsExamples of embedded, just-in time supportshyperlinked glossariesbackground informationand on-screen coachingtools and supports needed to access, analyze, organize, synthesize, and demonstrate understanding in varied wayschoice of content where appropriate, varied levels of support and challenge, and options for recruiting and sustaining interest and motivation
  • #40: National Center on Universal Design for Learning at CAST (2012). UDL and the curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlcurriculumMethods UDL curricula facilitate further differentiation of methods, based on learner variability in the context of the task, learner’s social/emotional resources, and the classroom climate. Flexible and varied, UDL methods are adjusted based on continual monitoring of learner progress.
  • #41: National Center on Universal Design for Learning at CAST (2012). UDL and the curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlcurriculumAssessmentGoal is to improve the accuracy and timeliness of assessmentsTo ensure that they are comprehensive and articulate enough to guide instruction – for all learners This is achieved by focus on the goal, as different from the means, enabling the provision of supports and scaffolds for construct irrelevant items. By broadening means to accommodate learner variability, UDL assessments reduce or remove barriers to accurate measurement of learner knowledge, skills, and engagement.Example: For a students with a disability in basic reading, paper based assessments that measure comprehension through independent reading of material without scaffolds such as oral administration, text-to-speech, may actually provide misleading results. If a student gets incorrect answers on this type of assessment, does it mean that don’t comprehend the content or that their was a barrier to them accessing the content as a result of an inflexible assessment? How do you know what to do next for this learner? How do you make an informed decision based upon this type of assessment result? Do you need to re-teach content? Maybe, maybe not. Do you need to reassess in a different manner to determine what the student actually knows?
  • #43: Make a visual display in your notes to help you align what is Universal Design and UDL and why it is so important to consider in the field of assistive technology? Explain this to a fellow learner.