Partial ordering in soft set context

Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.3, No.8, 2013
97
Partial Ordering in Soft Set Context
M. K. Dauda (corresponding author)
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna, Nigeria
Isiyaku Aliyu
Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna, Nigeria
A. M. Ibrahim
Department of Mathematics, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
Abstract
In [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7] basic introduction of soft set is discussed with examples. The main aim of this
paper is develop partial ordering in soft set context.
1. Introduction
Soft set theory was first proposed in [1]. It is a general mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainties and not
clearly defined objects. Traditional tools for formal modeling, reasoning and computing are crisp, deterministic
and precise in nature. However, in most cases, complicated problems in economics, engineering, environment,
social science, medical science, etc., that involved data which are not always all crisp cannot be successfully
dealt with using classical methods because of various types of uncertainties present in these problems. Soft set is
one of the various non-classical methods that can be considered as a mathematical tool for dealing with
uncertainties.
Various potential applications of soft set in many areas like, in smoothness of functions, game theory, operations
research, Riemann-integration, probability theory, theory of measurement and so on are highlighted in [2].
Following [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7] we present various operations on soft sets.
2. Concept of Soft set and Basic Definitions
Definition 2.1 (See [2] and [6]) A pair ( , ) is called a soft set over a given universal set , if and only if is
a mapping of a set of parameters , into the power set of . That is, ∶ ⟶ ( ). Clearly, a soft
set over is a parameterized family of subsets of a given universe . Also, for any ∈ , ( ) is considered as
the set of −approximate element of the soft set ( , ).
Example 1 (See [2])
(i) Let ( , ) be a topological space, that is, is a set and is a toplogy ( a family of subsets of called
the open sets of ). Then, the family of open neighbourhoods ( ) of point , where ( ) =
∈ | ∈ } may be considered as the soft set ( ( ), ).
(ii) Also, fuzzy set is a special case of soft set; let be a fuzzy set and be the membership function of
the fuzzy set , that is, is a mapping of into [0, 1], let ( ) = ∈ | ( ) ≥ }, ∈ [0, 1] be
a family of −level sets for function . If the family is known ( ) can be found by means of the
definition: ( ) = ! "∈[#,$],
%∈&(")
. Hence every fuzzy set A may be considered as the soft set ( , [0, 1]).
Definition 2.2 A soft set ( , ) over a universe is said to be null soft set denoted by ∅), if ∀+ ∈ , (+) = ∅.
Definition 2.3 A soft set ( , ) over a universe is called absolute soft set denoted by ( , ), , if ∀+ ∈ , (+) =
.
Definition 2.4 Let E = {+$, +-, +., . . . , +/} be a set of parameters. The not-set of E denoted by ¬ is defined
as ¬ = {¬+$, ¬+-, ¬+., . . ., ¬+/).
Definition 2.5 The complement of a soft set ( , ) denoted by ( , )1
is defined as ( , )1
=( 1
, ¬ ).
Where: 1
: ¬A →P( )is a mapping given by 1
( ) = – (¬ ), ∀ ∈¬
We call 1
the soft complement function of .
3 Soft set relations
Definition 3.1 [4] Let ( , ) and (5, 6) be two soft sets over , then the Cartesian product of ( , ) and (5, 6)
is define as ( , ) × (5, 6) = (8, × 6), where × 6 → ( × ) and 8(9, :) = (9) × 5(:) where
(9, :); × 6. i.e. 8(9, :) = (ℎ=, ℎ>); where ℎ=; (9) and ℎ>;5(:)}
Definition 3.2 [4] Let ( , ) and (5, 6) be two soft sets over , then a relation from ( , ) to (5, 6) is a soft
subset of ( , ) × (5, 6). A relation from ( , ) to (5, 6) is of the form (8$, ) where ⊂ × 6 and
8$(9, :) = 8(9, :) ∀ 9, :; . Where (8, × 6) = ( , ) × (5, 6) as defined above. (i.e. Cartesian product of
soft sets). Any subset of ( , ) × ( , ) is called a relation on ( , ). In an equivalent way, we can define the
relation ? on the soft set ( , ) in the parameterized form as follows.

Vol.3, No.8, 2013
98
If ( , ) = (9), (:), … }, then (9)? (:) if and only if (9) × (:) ∈ ?.
Definition 3.3 [4] Let ? be a soft set relation from ( , ) to (5, 6), then the domain of ?(ABC ?) is defined as
the soft set (D, $) where
$ = 9; : 8(9, :); ? EBF GBC+ :;6} and D(9$) = (9$), ∀9$; .
The range of ? (ran R) is defined as the soft set (?5, 6$) , where 6$⊂ 6 and
6$ = :;6: 8(9, :);? EBF GBC+ 9; } and ?5(:$) = 5(:$)∀:$;6.
Definition 3.4 [4] The identity relation H(&, ) on any soft set ( , ) is defined as follows (9)H(&, ) (:) IEE 9 =
:.
Example 2 H(&, ) = (9) × (9), (:) × (:), (J) × (J)} (For more example, see [3] and [4])
4. Composition of soft set relation
Definition 4.1 [3] Let ( , ), (5, 6) and (8, K) be three soft sets. Let ? be a soft set relation from ( , ) to
(5, 6) and be another soft set relation from (5, 6) to (8, K), then the composition of ? and is a new soft set
relation from ( , ) to (8, K) expressed as B? and is defined as follows;
If (9) is in ( , ) and 8(J) is in (8, K) then (9) B? 8(J) iff there is some 5(:) in (5, 6) such that
(9)?5(:) and 5(:)?8(J). (For more example, see [3] and [4])
Remark Composition of soft set relation is not commutative.
Types of soft set Relation (see[3])
Let ? be a relation on ( , ), then
(i) ? is reflexive if 8$(9, 9) ∈ ?, ∀9 ∈ .
(ii) ? is symmetric if 8$(9, :) ∈ ? ↔ 8$(:, 9) ∈ ?, ∀(9, :) ∈ × .
(iii) ? is anti-symmetric if whenever 8$(9, :) ∈ ? and 8$(:, 9) ∈ ? then 9 = :, ∀9, : ∈ ×
(iv) ? is transitive if 8$(9, :) ∈ ?, 8$(:, J) ∈ ? → 8$(9, J) ∈ ?, ∀9, :, J ∈ .
Equivalence relation and partition on soft sets (see[3])
Definition 4.2 A soft set relation ? on a soft set ( , ) is called an equivalence relation if it is reflexive,
symmetric and transitive.
Example 3 Consider a soft set ( , ) over = $, -, … , M}. = C$, C-} where
(C$) = $, -, N, O}, (C-) = ., P, Q, R, M}. Consider a relation ? defined on ( , ) as (C$) ×
(C-), (C-) × (C$), (C$) × (C$), (C-) × (C-)}
Definition 4.3 Let ( , ) be a soft set, then the equivalence class of (9) denoted by [ (9)] is defined as
[ (9)] = (:): (:)? (9)}.
In example 3 above, [ (C$)] = (C$), (C-)} = [ (C-)].
Definition 4.4 [3] The inverse of a soft set relation ? denoted as ?S$
is defined by
?S$
= (:) × (9): (9)? (:)}. It is clear from the above definition that the inverse of ? is defined by
reversing the order of every pair belonging to ?.
5. Partial Ordering Relations in Soft Set Theory Context
Order and precedence relationship appears in many different places in mathematics and computer science.
Definition 5.1 A relation ? on a soft set ( , ) is called a partial ordering of ( , ) or a partial order on ( , ) if
it has the following three properties ie ? is (i) Reflexive (ii) Antisymmetric and (iii) Transitive.
Suppose ? is a relation on a soft set ( , ) satisfying the following
[TU] (Reflexive): for any (9);( , ), we have (9)? (9)
[TV] (Antisymmetric): if (9)? (:) and (:)? (9), then (9) = (:)
[TW] (Transitive): if (9)? (:) and (:)? (J), then (9)? (J).
Then ? is called a partial order or simply an order relation, and ? is said to define a partial ordering of ( , ).
The soft set ( , ) with the partial ordering ? is called a partially ordered soft set or simply an ordered soft set.
The most familiar order relation called the usual order, is the relation ⊆ (reads “set inclusion”) on soft sets, for
this reason, a partial ordering relation is frequently denoted by
≼
With this notation, the above three properties of a partial order appear in the following form.
[TU] (Reflexive): for any (9);( , ), we have (9) ≼ (9)
[TV] (Antisymmetric): if (9) ≼ (:) and (:) ≼ (9), then (9) = (:)
[TW] (Transitive): if (9) ≼ (:) and (:) ≼ (J), then (9) ≼ (J).
Definition 5.2 A soft set ( , ) together with a partial ordering ? is called a partially ordered soft set or posset.
An ordered soft set consist of two things, a soft set ( , ) and the partial ordering ≼. Here we denoted ordered
soft set as Y( , ), ≼Z.
Suppose ( , ) is an ordered soft set. Then the statement

Vol.3, No.8, 2013
99
(9) ≼ (:) is read “ (9) precedes (:)”.
In this context we also writes
(9) ≺ (:) means (9) ≼ (:) and (9) = (:) reads “ (9) strictly precedes (:)
(:) ≽ (9) means (9) ≼ (:) reads “ (:) succeeds (9)”.
(:) ≻ (9) means (9) ≻ (:) reads “ (:) strictly succeeds (9)”.
Remark ⊁, ⊀, ≵ 9aA ⋠ means negation of the above
Example 4 Consider a soft set ( , ) over = $, -, … , N}. = 9$, 9-} where
(9$) = $, -, N}, (C-) = ., P, N}. Consider a relation ? defined on ( , ) as
(9$) × (9$), (9-) × (9-), (9$) × (9-), (9-) × (9$)}
This relation is a partial order relation.
Definition 5.3 Let ≼ be any partial ordering of a soft set ( , ). The relation ≽, that is (9) succeds (:), is
also a partial ordering of ( , ), it is called the dual order. Observe that (9) ≼ (:) if and only if (:) ≽
(9); hence the dual order ≽ is the inverse of the relation ≼, that is ≽ =≼S$
.
Definition 5.4 Let ( , $) be a soft subset of an ordered soft set ( , ) and suppose that (9), (:);( , $).
Then the order is ( , ) induces as order in ( , $) in the following natural way. (9) ≼ (:) as an element of
( , $) whenever (9) ≼ (:) as an element of ( , ).
More precisely, if ? is a partial ordering on ( , ), then the relation
?(&, d) = ? ∩ [( , ) × ( , )]
is a partial ordering of ( , $) called the induced order on ( , $) or the restriction of ? to ( , $). The soft
subset ( , $) with the induced order is called an ordered soft subset of ( , ).
Definition 5.5 suppose ≺ is a relation on soft set ( , ) satisfying the following two properties
[fU] (Irreflexive): for any (9);( , ), we have (9) ⋠ (9)
[fV] (Transitive): if (9) ≼ (:) and (:) ≼ (J), then (9) ≼ (J).
Then ≺ is called a quasi-order on ( , ).
Remark
There is a close relationship between partial orders and quasi-orders, specifically, if ≼ is a partial order on a
soft set ( , ) and we define (9) ≺ (:) mean (9) ≼ (:) but (9) ≠ (:), then ≺ is a quasi-order on
( , ). Conversely, if ≺ is a quasi-order on a soft set ( , ) and we define (9) ≼ (:) to mean (9) ≺ (:)
or (9) = (:), then ≼ is a partial order on ( , ). This allows us to switch back and forth between a partial
order and its corresponding quasi-order using whichever is more convenient.
Definition 5.6 Suppose (9), (:) are distinct element in a partially ordered soft set ( , ). We say (9) and
(:) are comparable if
(9) ≺ (:) or (:) ≺ (9).
That is if one of them precedes the other. Thus (9) and (:) are non comparable, written
(9) ǀ⃦ (:).
If (9) ⊀ (:) and (:) ⊀ (9).
Linear Ordered Soft Set
The word “Partial” is used in defining a partially ordered soft set ( , ), since some of the element of ( , )
need not be comparable. Suppose on the other hand, every pair of element of ( , ) are comparable. Then ( , )
is said to be linearly ordered or totally ordered. Although an ordered soft set ( , ) may not be linearly ordered,
it is still possible for a subsoftset ( , $) of ( , ) to be linearly ordered. Such a linearly subsoftset ( , $) of an
ordered soft set ( , ) is called a chain in ( , ). Clearly every subsoftset of a linearly ordered softset ( , )
must also be linearly ordered.
Definition 5,7 if (( , ), ≼) is a partially ordered soft set and every two elements of ( , ) are comparable,
( , ) is called totally ordered or linearly ordered soft set, and ≼ is called a total order or a linear order. A
totally ordered soft set is also called a chain.
Example 5 Consider the soft set ( , ) ordered by set inclusion with = 9$, 9-} and = $, -, … , N} is not
linearly ordered. Suppose (9$), (9-) are non-comparable.
Observed that the empty soft set ∅, (9$)9aA ( , ) do form a chain in ( ), since ∅⊆ (9$)⊆( , ). Similarly,
∅, (9-)9aA ( , ) form a chain in ( ).
Product Soft Set and Order
Here we discuss the different ways of defining an order on a soft set which is constructed from ordered soft set.
There are a number of ways to define an order relation on the Cartesian product of given ordered soft set. Two of
these ways follow

Vol.3, No.8, 2013
100
(i) Product Order: Suppose ( , ) and (5, 6) are ordered soft set. Then the following is an order relation on the
product ( , ) × (5, 6) called the product order
(9), (:)} ≼ 5(9i), (:i)} if (9) ≼ 5(9i)} and (:) ≼ 5(:i
)
Example 6 Suppose ( , ) and (5, 6) are ordered soft set. We show that the product order ( , ) × (5, 6),
defined by (9$), (9-)} ≼ 5(:$), 5(:-)} if (9$)⊆5(:$) and (9-)⊆5(:-) is a partial ordering of
( , ) × (5, 6).
Goal: we show that ≼ is (a) reflexive (b) antisymmetric (c) transitive
(a) Since (9) = (9) and 5(:) = 5(:) , we have (9) ⊆ (9) and 5(:) ⊆5(:) . Hence
(9$), (9-)}⊆ 5(:$), 5(:-)} and ≼ is reflexive.
(b) Suppose (9$), (9-)}⊆ 5(:$), 5(:-)} and 5(:$), 5(:-)}⊆ (9$), (9-)} then (9$)⊆5(:$)} and
(9-)⊆5(:-)}, also 5(:$)⊆ (9$)} and 5(:-)⊆ (9-)}. Thus, (9$) = 5(:$) and (9-) = 5(:-). Hence,
(9$), (9-)} = 5(:$), 5(:-)} and is antisymmetric.
(c) Suppose (9$), (9-)} ≼ 5(:$), 5(:-)} and 5(:$), 5(:-)} ≼ 8(J$), 8(J-)} by transitivity, we have
(9$) (9-)} ≼ 8(J$), 8(J-)}, hence the proof.
(ii) Lexicographic Order: Suppose ( , ) and (5, 6) are linearly ordered soft set. Then the following is an
order relation on the product set ( , ) × (5, 6), called the lexicographic or dictionary order.
(9$), (9-)} ≼ 5(:$), 5(:-)} j
IE (9$) ≺ 5(:$)
BF IE (9$) = 5(:$)9aA (9-) ≺ 5(:-).
k
Thus order can be extended to ( $, $), ( $, $), … , ( l, l) as follows
(9$), (9-), … , (9/) ≺ 5(:$), 5(:-), … , 5(:/)}
If (9$) = 5(:$), (9-) = 5(:-), … , (9lS$) = 5(:lS$) but (9l) ≺ (:l)
NB: Lexicographical order is also linear
6. Conclusion
Soft set has vital applications in many areas as highlighted in [1] and [2]. Partial ordering also plays an important
role in mathematics hence developing partial ordering relation in soft set context is of immense benefit.
References
[1] A Sezgin et el, On operation of soft sets. Computers and Mathematics with Applications. Volume 57, 2009,
Page 1547-1553.
[2] D. Molodtsov. Soft Set Theory - First Results. Computers and Mathematics with Applications Volume 37,
1999, 19-31
[3] Ibrahim, A. M., Dauda, M. K. and Singh, D., Composition of soft set relations and construction of
transitive closure, Mathematical Theory and Modeling, volume 2, 2012, 98-107.
[4] K. V. Babitha and J. J. Sunil. Soft Set Relations and Functions. Computers and Mathematics with
Applications, 60 (2010) 1840-1849
[5] M. Irfan Ali et el. On some new operation in soft sets theory. Computers and Mathematics with
Applications.Volume 57, 2009, Page 1547- 1553.
[6] P.K. Maji, R. Biswas and A. R. Roy. Soft Set Theory. Computers and Mathematics with Applications.
Volume 45, 2003, Page 555-562
[7] Z. Pawlak, Hard and Soft Sets, Proceeding of The International EWorkshop on Rough
Sets and Knowledge Discovery, Baniff, 1993.

This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR PAPERS
The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. There’s no deadline for
submission. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission
instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/
The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Partial ordering in soft set context

More Related Content

What's hot (16)

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to Partial ordering in soft set context (20)

More from Alexander Decker (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Partial ordering in soft set context