SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Patient-Centered Care
Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication
Lecture c – Informatics Tools to Support Patient-Provider
Communications
This material (Comp 25 Unit 5) was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award
Number 90WT0006.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
Patient-Provider Communication
Learning Objectives
• Objective 1: Explain the importance,
elements, and processes of patient-physician
communication (Lecture a)
• Objective 2: Discuss the concept of trust in
the context of health care interactions
(Lecture b)
• Objective 3: Describe various informatics
tools and the practical considerations to
support patient-provider communication
(Lecture c)
2
Physician-patient communication in
the e-Health context
5.10 Figure (Weiner, J, 2012)
Woods SS, Schwartz E, Tuepker A, Press NA, Nazi KM, Turvey CL, Nichol W.P Patient Experiences With Full Electronic
Access to Health Records and Clinical Notes Through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: Qualitative Study J
Med Internet Res 2013;15(3):e65 URL: http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/
3
Communication
• Use of digital tools and facilitating
communication between patients,
caregivers, and health care providers to
improve data quality and access to health
care
4
The use of digital technology has
revolutionized how we communicate
5.11 Figure (Pew Research Center, 2011)
5
Connected generation: Perspectives from
tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world
• “Social media will continue to grow, both on a
personal and organizational level. The
Internet is now the new place where business
relationships are formed.” – United States
student, age 21
• “We stand on the precipice of a paradigm
shift into a fully connected society. We must
not be afraid to embrace change. Those who
can manage this will survive; those who don’t
will perish.” – United States student, age 30
• (IBM Global Business Services, 2012)
6
What does the data tell us?
• People are using digital and social media
to communicate more than ever before!
• Use of social media in government,
business, and health care
• By consumers and health care
practitioners
• And our communication preferences are
changing…
7
The mobile health (mHealth)
market will continue to grow
• New technologies
• Decreasing cost
• Increasing acceptance
• Population age
• Foundation in place
• Move to personalized care
• (Guillemi and Benedict, 2013)
8
mHealth as the future of health
care
• mHealth is not a separate industry, but
rather it’s the future of a health care
industry that’s evolving to care for patients
differently, putting them first to deliver
services better, faster, and less
expensively.
– (Gibbons, Wilson, Samal, et al. 2009)
9
General well-being motivates
health self-tracking
• 50% of consumers
track or monitor their
health, wellness, or
fitness measurements
• The old and sick often
utilize devices that
track health
measurements more
than the young and
healthy, demonstrating
adoption of this
technology for all age
groups
5.12: Figure (Manhattan Research, Cybercitizen
Health U.S., 2013) 10
How consumers seek out health
information
• 35% of U.S. adults say that at one time or another they have
gone online specifically to try to figure out what medical
condition they or someone else might have
– (Pew Research Center, 2013)
• One in five Internet users have consulted online reviews and
rankings of health care service providers and treatments
– (Pew Research Center, 2013)
• 18% of Internet users, or 13% of adults, have gone online to
find others who might have health concerns similar to theirs.
People living with chronic and rare conditions are significantly
more likely to do this.
– (Pew Research Center, 2011)
11
Examples of informatics tools to
support patient-provider
communication
• Patient portals
• Personal health records
• Online patient communities
12
Patient portal functionality
• Recent doctor visits
• Discharge summaries
• Medications
• Immunizations
• Allergies
• Lab results
• Exchange secure email
with health care teams
• Request prescription
refills
• Schedule non-urgent
appointments
• Check benefits and
coverage
• Update contact
information
• Make payments
• Download and
complete forms
• View educational
materials
13
Personal health records (PHR)
• Patient-initiated electronic record that is separate from
the EHR
• Contains information selected and added by the patient
• Allows the patient the ability to update and change their
health information at any time
• Provides the patient the ability to share this information
with anyone that they choose
• Patient may need to add health information manually
• Patient must manually update health information
• Limited ability for providers to send information directly to
PHR
14
Patient communities
• PatientsLikeMe® and their “Data for Good”
campaign to encourage health data
sharing to advance medicine
– More than 250,000 members are donating
their disease data to research via
PatientsLikeMe®
– To date, more than 21 million structured data
points contributed by patients about their
disease experiences
15
Practical considerations
• Health literacy
• Access to information
• Privacy and security
• Culture change
16
What is health literacy?
• The degree to which individuals have the
capacity to obtain, process, and
understand basic health information
needed to make appropriate health
decisions and services needed to prevent
or treat illness
– U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Health Resources and Services
Administration
17
The patient journey: care continuum,
literacy, and personal health
information
• Patient engagement / awareness and clinical knowledge
• Presentation and evaluation
– Symptoms, personal preferences, family history
• Diagnosis
– Patient / caregiver research
• Consideration of treatment options
– Shared decision-making
• Treatment decision
• Leverage digital / mobile communications and share data
– Adhering to / monitoring therapy
• (Rulon, 2014)
18
Other health literacy tools
• AHRQ’s Questions to Ask Your Doctor
• AHIP’s Choosing Wisely Doctor-Patient Lists
• AARP’s Ask the Right Questions and Get The
Most From Your Medicines
• Informed Medical Decisions Foundation’s
Shared Decision Making Resources
19
Patient access to their records
• Patients felt that seeing
their records:
– Positively affected
communication with
providers and the health
system
– Enhanced knowledge of
their health
– Improved self-care
– Allowed for greater
participation in the
quality of their care
– (Woods, Schwartz,
Tuepker, et al, 2013)
• Patients felt more in
control of their care and
reported increased
medication adherence
• Physicians did not report
longer visits and many
did not change
documentation content
or take longer to write
notes
• (Delbanco, Walker, Bell,
et al, 2012)
20
EHR information provided by the
patient can be valuable
• The longitudinal medical record (LMR) is often
incomplete
• Patient-reported data is a promising source of general
health information
• “Patients have important knowledge of their basic
health maintenance, and can and should assist
physicians in recording information. Patient access
will increase the quality of this data to help ensure that
the physician has the most comprehensive file
possible with which to work. In addition to quality
assurance, patient-provided data and patient access
to LMR data will help increase communication
between provider and patient.”
– (Wuerdeman et al., 2005)
21
Patient perceptions regarding
privacy and security are important
• If a person does not think that health care
providers have reasonable protections in place for
EHRs, they are:
– Over eight times more likely to have withheld
information from their provider, compared to someone
who does think there are protections
– Almost five times more likely to have withheld
information from their provider, compared to the
overall population
– (Hughes, Patel, Pritts, 2014)
• For more information on ensuring privacy and
security of shared data, please see component 22
unit 10
22
Culture change: physicians need
to adapt
• Dialogue
– “If you don’t mind, I am going to be typing as you speak.
I’m happy to show you what I’m writing”
– “I’m going to look up your test results. Would you like to
look at them together?”
• Caution
– Documenting socially stigmatizing health conditions
– Sensitivity to patient perceptions
• Patient engagement
– Improving management of chronic disease and mental
illness
– Patient-provider collaboration
• (White and Danis, 2013)
23
Themes
• Culture dominates
• “Listen first, listen fully”
• Patient engagement is a skill, not a trait
• Trust matters
• Prepared, engaged patients are a
fundamental precursor to high quality care,
lower costs, and better health
24
Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication,
Summary – Lecture c, Informatics Tools to
Support Patient-Provider Communication
• Digital technology has changed how we communicate,
especially between patients and providers
• Mobile health and self-tracking of general well-being
will continue to grow
• Examples of informatics tools to support patient-
provider communication are patient portals, personal
health records, and online patient communities.
• Practical considerations for communicative informatics
and technology include access to data, health literacy,
privacy and security, and culture.
• Providing patients with access to their medical record
and the ability to contribute information could improve
their care
25
Unit 5 Summary: Patient-Provider
Communication
• Providers with good communication skills identify patients’
problems more accurately and their patients adjust better
psychologically and are more satisfied with their care
• Effective methods of communication skills are available and
the opportunity to practice them is essential
• Listen carefully to patients, treat them respectfully, be honest
and consistent, follow through on commitments, and have an
accepting attitude
• Digital technology has changed how we communicate,
especially between patients and providers and examples of
informatics tools to support patient-provider communication
are patient portals, personal health records, and online patient
communities
26
Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c
References
Delbanco, T, Walker, J, Bell, SK, Darer, JD, Elmore, JG, Farag, N, Feldman, HJ, Mejilla,
R, Ngo, L, Ralston, JD, Ross, SE, Trivedi, N, Vodicka, E, & Leveille, SG. (2012).
Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 157(7):461-
470.http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1363511
Gibbons, MC, Wilson, RF, Samal, L, Lehman, CU, Dickersin, K, Lehmann, HP,
Aboumatar, H, Finkelstein, J, Shelton, E, Sharma, R, & Bass, EB. (2009). Impact of
consumer health informatics applications. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 188:1-546.
Guillemi, A, & Benedict, K. (2013). mHealth trends and strategies. A special report by
netcentric strategies.
Hughes, P, Patel, V, & Pritts, J. (2014). Health care providers’ role in protecting EHRs:
implications for consumer support of EHRs, HIE and patient-provider communication
ONC Data Brief Number 15.
http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/022414_hit_attitudesaboutprivacydatabrief.p
df
IBM Global Business Services. (2012). Connected generation. Perspectives from
tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world. Insights from the 2012 IBM Global Student
Study
27
Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 1)
References
Institute of Medicine. (2013). Partnering with patients to drive shared decisions, better
value and care improvement, meeting summary.
http://iom.edu/Reports/2013/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2013/Partnering-with-
Patients/PwP_meetingsummary.pdf
https://www.patientslikeme.com/about
https://www.patientslikeme.com/join/dataforgood
Pew Research Center. (2013). Pew Research Internet Project: health fact sheet.
http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/
Pew Research Center. (2013). Health online 2013.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
Pew Research Center. (2013). Peer-to-peer health care.
http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/peer-to-peer-health-care/
Rulon, MS. (2014). Engaging patients in their healthcare through health information:
why it’s important. Presentation. NYHIMA Conference.
White, A, & Danis, M. (2013). Enhancing patient-centered communication and
collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. JAMA.
309(22).
28
Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 2)
References
Woods, SS, Schwartz, E, Tuepke,r A, Press, NA, Nazi, KM, Turvey, CL, & Nichol, WP.
(2013). Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical
notes through the MyHealtheVet personal health record pilot: qualitative study J Med
Internet Res. 15(3):e65. http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/
Wuerdeman, L, Volk, L, Pizziferrri, L, Tsurikova, R, Harris, C, Feygin, R, Epstein, M,
Meyers, K, Wald, JS, Lansky, D, & Bates, DW. (2005). How accurate is information
that patients contribute to their electronic health record? AMIA 2005 Symposium
Proceedings. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16779157?dopt=Citation
.
29
Patient-Provider Communication
References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 3)
Charts, Tables, Figures
5.10 Figure: Weiner, J. (2012). Figure 1. Physician / patient communication in the “e-
health” context’. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1(33).
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461429/
5.11 Figure: Pew Research Center. (2011). Texting popular around globe.
5.12: Figure: Manhattan Research, Cybercitizen Health U.S. (2013). Reasons for
tracking health measurements.
30
Unit 5: Patient-Provider
Communication, Lecture c –
Informatics Tools to Support Patient-
Provider Communication
This material was developed by Columbia
University, funded by the Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of the
National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology under Award Number
90WT0006.
31

More Related Content

PDF
xPatient_Eurecat_20160921_EN
PPTX
Susan Dentzer - "Plain Talk" with U.S. Consumers and Patients About the Tripl...
PPTX
HIMSS mHealth "How To" Guide
PDF
Lynn Quincy - Health Insurance Literacy
PDF
HealthCare Service Provider
PDF
Patient Engagement in Healthcare Improves Health and Reduces Costs
PPT
Cindy Brach - Becoming a Health Literate Organization
PPT
Eysenbach: eHealth
xPatient_Eurecat_20160921_EN
Susan Dentzer - "Plain Talk" with U.S. Consumers and Patients About the Tripl...
HIMSS mHealth "How To" Guide
Lynn Quincy - Health Insurance Literacy
HealthCare Service Provider
Patient Engagement in Healthcare Improves Health and Reduces Costs
Cindy Brach - Becoming a Health Literate Organization
Eysenbach: eHealth

What's hot (20)

PPT
Eysenbach: Consumer health informatics
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 4b Lecture
PDF
How to Reduce Readmissions by Changing Patient Education
PPT
Stanford UniversityDiabetes Health Literacy Project 030614
PDF
Improving Patients’ Health Acute Care Final
PPTX
Why Patient Engagement is Imperative: Implications for research, healthcare, ...
PPTX
The Empowered Patient of the 21st Century – How Technology Enables Good Medic...
PDF
Optimizing your EHR Value through Patient Engagement
PPTX
Improving the Patient Experience with HIT Webcast
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 7b Lecture
PPT
Chair In Health Information (Chair Proposal)
PPTX
Florencia Nochetto - 25,000 Words and More: Applying the President's Digital ...
PPTX
SMeGPAus
PDF
Patient_Engagement_Whitepaper
PPT
Michigan Hospital Association Governance meeting
PPTX
integration_φραγκουλης
PPTX
MedInfo 2010 Report
PDF
Value based healthcare 2020
PDF
MPN Research Priorities
Eysenbach: Consumer health informatics
Patient Centered Care | Unit 4b Lecture
How to Reduce Readmissions by Changing Patient Education
Stanford UniversityDiabetes Health Literacy Project 030614
Improving Patients’ Health Acute Care Final
Why Patient Engagement is Imperative: Implications for research, healthcare, ...
The Empowered Patient of the 21st Century – How Technology Enables Good Medic...
Optimizing your EHR Value through Patient Engagement
Improving the Patient Experience with HIT Webcast
Patient Centered Care | Unit 7b Lecture
Chair In Health Information (Chair Proposal)
Florencia Nochetto - 25,000 Words and More: Applying the President's Digital ...
SMeGPAus
Patient_Engagement_Whitepaper
Michigan Hospital Association Governance meeting
integration_φραγκουλης
MedInfo 2010 Report
Value based healthcare 2020
MPN Research Priorities
Ad

Similar to Patient Centered Care | Unit 5c Lecture (20)

PPT
PowerPoint Presentation +.ppt
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 2c Lecture
PPTX
In search of a digital health compass: My data, my decision, our power
PPT
Information systems for health decision making - a citizen's perspective
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 4a Lecture
PDF
2019 IPPOSI membership survey results
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 1 Lecture
PPTX
Chapter 17
PDF
Person-generated health data: How can it help us to feel better?
PPTX
Lancaster General Ppt Final
PDF
A Descriptive Study of Health Literacy Practices at GBUAHN
DOCX
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha Scripts-27
PPTX
Patient Centered Care | Unit 3a Lecture
PPT
M. Chris Gibbons - Health IT and Healthcare Disparities
PPTX
Emerging into E-Health Information Management
PDF
Why Electronic Health Records are Ill Suited for Population Health 012616
PDF
Why Electronic Health Records are Ill Suited for Population Health
PPTX
Consumer Health Information & Telehealth
PPTX
Digital Health Technology: The Ultimate Patient Advocate
PPTX
Informatics and healthcare disparities 2014
PowerPoint Presentation +.ppt
Patient Centered Care | Unit 2c Lecture
In search of a digital health compass: My data, my decision, our power
Information systems for health decision making - a citizen's perspective
Patient Centered Care | Unit 4a Lecture
2019 IPPOSI membership survey results
Patient Centered Care | Unit 1 Lecture
Chapter 17
Person-generated health data: How can it help us to feel better?
Lancaster General Ppt Final
A Descriptive Study of Health Literacy Practices at GBUAHN
Dr. Obumneke Amadi-Onuoha Scripts-27
Patient Centered Care | Unit 3a Lecture
M. Chris Gibbons - Health IT and Healthcare Disparities
Emerging into E-Health Information Management
Why Electronic Health Records are Ill Suited for Population Health 012616
Why Electronic Health Records are Ill Suited for Population Health
Consumer Health Information & Telehealth
Digital Health Technology: The Ultimate Patient Advocate
Informatics and healthcare disparities 2014
Ad

More from CMDLMS (20)

PPTX
Culture of healthcare_ week 1_ lecture_slides
PPTX
Why bother
PPTX
Ensuring two way communications
PPTX
Human Development
PPTX
Lecture 11A
PPTX
lecture C
PPTX
lecture 11B
PPTX
lecture 10a
PPTX
lecture 9 B
PPTX
Lecture 9 A
PPTX
Lecture 9C
PPTX
Lecture 8B
PPTX
Lecture 8A
PPTX
Lecture 7B
PPTX
Lecture C
PPTX
lecture 7A
PPTX
Lecture 6B
PPTX
Lecture 6A
PPTX
Lecture 5B
PPTX
Lecture 5 A
Culture of healthcare_ week 1_ lecture_slides
Why bother
Ensuring two way communications
Human Development
Lecture 11A
lecture C
lecture 11B
lecture 10a
lecture 9 B
Lecture 9 A
Lecture 9C
Lecture 8B
Lecture 8A
Lecture 7B
Lecture C
lecture 7A
Lecture 6B
Lecture 6A
Lecture 5B
Lecture 5 A

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 16
PDF
crisisintervention-210721062718.presentatiodnf
PDF
Medical_Biology_and_Genetics_Current_Studies_I.pdf
PPTX
Newer Technologies in medical field.pptx
PPTX
POSTURE.pptx......,............. .........
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 11
DOCX
Copies if quanti.docxsegdfhfkhjhlkjlj,klkj
PDF
cerebral aneurysm.. neurosurgery , anaesthesia
PDF
Back node with known primary managementt
PDF
health promotion and maintenance of elderly
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
PPTX
unit1-introduction of nursing education..
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 4
PPTX
OSTEOMYELITIS and OSTEORADIONECROSIS.pptx
PDF
ENT MedMap you can study for the exam with this.pdf
PPTX
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 15
PDF
demography and familyplanning-181222172149.pdf
PPTX
Understanding The Self : 1Sexual health
PPTX
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
PPTX
Acute renal failure.pptx for BNs 2nd year
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 16
crisisintervention-210721062718.presentatiodnf
Medical_Biology_and_Genetics_Current_Studies_I.pdf
Newer Technologies in medical field.pptx
POSTURE.pptx......,............. .........
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 11
Copies if quanti.docxsegdfhfkhjhlkjlj,klkj
cerebral aneurysm.. neurosurgery , anaesthesia
Back node with known primary managementt
health promotion and maintenance of elderly
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 13
unit1-introduction of nursing education..
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 4
OSTEOMYELITIS and OSTEORADIONECROSIS.pptx
ENT MedMap you can study for the exam with this.pdf
Nancy Caroline Emergency Paramedic Chapter 15
demography and familyplanning-181222172149.pdf
Understanding The Self : 1Sexual health
Full Slide Deck - SY CF Talk Adelaide 10June.pptx
Acute renal failure.pptx for BNs 2nd year

Patient Centered Care | Unit 5c Lecture

  • 1. Patient-Centered Care Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication Lecture c – Informatics Tools to Support Patient-Provider Communications This material (Comp 25 Unit 5) was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number 90WT0006. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
  • 2. Patient-Provider Communication Learning Objectives • Objective 1: Explain the importance, elements, and processes of patient-physician communication (Lecture a) • Objective 2: Discuss the concept of trust in the context of health care interactions (Lecture b) • Objective 3: Describe various informatics tools and the practical considerations to support patient-provider communication (Lecture c) 2
  • 3. Physician-patient communication in the e-Health context 5.10 Figure (Weiner, J, 2012) Woods SS, Schwartz E, Tuepker A, Press NA, Nazi KM, Turvey CL, Nichol W.P Patient Experiences With Full Electronic Access to Health Records and Clinical Notes Through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: Qualitative Study J Med Internet Res 2013;15(3):e65 URL: http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/ 3
  • 4. Communication • Use of digital tools and facilitating communication between patients, caregivers, and health care providers to improve data quality and access to health care 4
  • 5. The use of digital technology has revolutionized how we communicate 5.11 Figure (Pew Research Center, 2011) 5
  • 6. Connected generation: Perspectives from tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world • “Social media will continue to grow, both on a personal and organizational level. The Internet is now the new place where business relationships are formed.” – United States student, age 21 • “We stand on the precipice of a paradigm shift into a fully connected society. We must not be afraid to embrace change. Those who can manage this will survive; those who don’t will perish.” – United States student, age 30 • (IBM Global Business Services, 2012) 6
  • 7. What does the data tell us? • People are using digital and social media to communicate more than ever before! • Use of social media in government, business, and health care • By consumers and health care practitioners • And our communication preferences are changing… 7
  • 8. The mobile health (mHealth) market will continue to grow • New technologies • Decreasing cost • Increasing acceptance • Population age • Foundation in place • Move to personalized care • (Guillemi and Benedict, 2013) 8
  • 9. mHealth as the future of health care • mHealth is not a separate industry, but rather it’s the future of a health care industry that’s evolving to care for patients differently, putting them first to deliver services better, faster, and less expensively. – (Gibbons, Wilson, Samal, et al. 2009) 9
  • 10. General well-being motivates health self-tracking • 50% of consumers track or monitor their health, wellness, or fitness measurements • The old and sick often utilize devices that track health measurements more than the young and healthy, demonstrating adoption of this technology for all age groups 5.12: Figure (Manhattan Research, Cybercitizen Health U.S., 2013) 10
  • 11. How consumers seek out health information • 35% of U.S. adults say that at one time or another they have gone online specifically to try to figure out what medical condition they or someone else might have – (Pew Research Center, 2013) • One in five Internet users have consulted online reviews and rankings of health care service providers and treatments – (Pew Research Center, 2013) • 18% of Internet users, or 13% of adults, have gone online to find others who might have health concerns similar to theirs. People living with chronic and rare conditions are significantly more likely to do this. – (Pew Research Center, 2011) 11
  • 12. Examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication • Patient portals • Personal health records • Online patient communities 12
  • 13. Patient portal functionality • Recent doctor visits • Discharge summaries • Medications • Immunizations • Allergies • Lab results • Exchange secure email with health care teams • Request prescription refills • Schedule non-urgent appointments • Check benefits and coverage • Update contact information • Make payments • Download and complete forms • View educational materials 13
  • 14. Personal health records (PHR) • Patient-initiated electronic record that is separate from the EHR • Contains information selected and added by the patient • Allows the patient the ability to update and change their health information at any time • Provides the patient the ability to share this information with anyone that they choose • Patient may need to add health information manually • Patient must manually update health information • Limited ability for providers to send information directly to PHR 14
  • 15. Patient communities • PatientsLikeMe® and their “Data for Good” campaign to encourage health data sharing to advance medicine – More than 250,000 members are donating their disease data to research via PatientsLikeMe® – To date, more than 21 million structured data points contributed by patients about their disease experiences 15
  • 16. Practical considerations • Health literacy • Access to information • Privacy and security • Culture change 16
  • 17. What is health literacy? • The degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information needed to make appropriate health decisions and services needed to prevent or treat illness – U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration 17
  • 18. The patient journey: care continuum, literacy, and personal health information • Patient engagement / awareness and clinical knowledge • Presentation and evaluation – Symptoms, personal preferences, family history • Diagnosis – Patient / caregiver research • Consideration of treatment options – Shared decision-making • Treatment decision • Leverage digital / mobile communications and share data – Adhering to / monitoring therapy • (Rulon, 2014) 18
  • 19. Other health literacy tools • AHRQ’s Questions to Ask Your Doctor • AHIP’s Choosing Wisely Doctor-Patient Lists • AARP’s Ask the Right Questions and Get The Most From Your Medicines • Informed Medical Decisions Foundation’s Shared Decision Making Resources 19
  • 20. Patient access to their records • Patients felt that seeing their records: – Positively affected communication with providers and the health system – Enhanced knowledge of their health – Improved self-care – Allowed for greater participation in the quality of their care – (Woods, Schwartz, Tuepker, et al, 2013) • Patients felt more in control of their care and reported increased medication adherence • Physicians did not report longer visits and many did not change documentation content or take longer to write notes • (Delbanco, Walker, Bell, et al, 2012) 20
  • 21. EHR information provided by the patient can be valuable • The longitudinal medical record (LMR) is often incomplete • Patient-reported data is a promising source of general health information • “Patients have important knowledge of their basic health maintenance, and can and should assist physicians in recording information. Patient access will increase the quality of this data to help ensure that the physician has the most comprehensive file possible with which to work. In addition to quality assurance, patient-provided data and patient access to LMR data will help increase communication between provider and patient.” – (Wuerdeman et al., 2005) 21
  • 22. Patient perceptions regarding privacy and security are important • If a person does not think that health care providers have reasonable protections in place for EHRs, they are: – Over eight times more likely to have withheld information from their provider, compared to someone who does think there are protections – Almost five times more likely to have withheld information from their provider, compared to the overall population – (Hughes, Patel, Pritts, 2014) • For more information on ensuring privacy and security of shared data, please see component 22 unit 10 22
  • 23. Culture change: physicians need to adapt • Dialogue – “If you don’t mind, I am going to be typing as you speak. I’m happy to show you what I’m writing” – “I’m going to look up your test results. Would you like to look at them together?” • Caution – Documenting socially stigmatizing health conditions – Sensitivity to patient perceptions • Patient engagement – Improving management of chronic disease and mental illness – Patient-provider collaboration • (White and Danis, 2013) 23
  • 24. Themes • Culture dominates • “Listen first, listen fully” • Patient engagement is a skill, not a trait • Trust matters • Prepared, engaged patients are a fundamental precursor to high quality care, lower costs, and better health 24
  • 25. Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication, Summary – Lecture c, Informatics Tools to Support Patient-Provider Communication • Digital technology has changed how we communicate, especially between patients and providers • Mobile health and self-tracking of general well-being will continue to grow • Examples of informatics tools to support patient- provider communication are patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities. • Practical considerations for communicative informatics and technology include access to data, health literacy, privacy and security, and culture. • Providing patients with access to their medical record and the ability to contribute information could improve their care 25
  • 26. Unit 5 Summary: Patient-Provider Communication • Providers with good communication skills identify patients’ problems more accurately and their patients adjust better psychologically and are more satisfied with their care • Effective methods of communication skills are available and the opportunity to practice them is essential • Listen carefully to patients, treat them respectfully, be honest and consistent, follow through on commitments, and have an accepting attitude • Digital technology has changed how we communicate, especially between patients and providers and examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication are patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities 26
  • 27. Patient-Provider Communication References – Lecture c References Delbanco, T, Walker, J, Bell, SK, Darer, JD, Elmore, JG, Farag, N, Feldman, HJ, Mejilla, R, Ngo, L, Ralston, JD, Ross, SE, Trivedi, N, Vodicka, E, & Leveille, SG. (2012). Inviting patients to read their doctors’ notes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 157(7):461- 470.http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=1363511 Gibbons, MC, Wilson, RF, Samal, L, Lehman, CU, Dickersin, K, Lehmann, HP, Aboumatar, H, Finkelstein, J, Shelton, E, Sharma, R, & Bass, EB. (2009). Impact of consumer health informatics applications. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 188:1-546. Guillemi, A, & Benedict, K. (2013). mHealth trends and strategies. A special report by netcentric strategies. Hughes, P, Patel, V, & Pritts, J. (2014). Health care providers’ role in protecting EHRs: implications for consumer support of EHRs, HIE and patient-provider communication ONC Data Brief Number 15. http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/022414_hit_attitudesaboutprivacydatabrief.p df IBM Global Business Services. (2012). Connected generation. Perspectives from tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world. Insights from the 2012 IBM Global Student Study 27
  • 28. Patient-Provider Communication References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 1) References Institute of Medicine. (2013). Partnering with patients to drive shared decisions, better value and care improvement, meeting summary. http://iom.edu/Reports/2013/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2013/Partnering-with- Patients/PwP_meetingsummary.pdf https://www.patientslikeme.com/about https://www.patientslikeme.com/join/dataforgood Pew Research Center. (2013). Pew Research Internet Project: health fact sheet. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/health-fact-sheet/ Pew Research Center. (2013). Health online 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ Pew Research Center. (2013). Peer-to-peer health care. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/peer-to-peer-health-care/ Rulon, MS. (2014). Engaging patients in their healthcare through health information: why it’s important. Presentation. NYHIMA Conference. White, A, & Danis, M. (2013). Enhancing patient-centered communication and collaboration by using the electronic health record in the examination room. JAMA. 309(22). 28
  • 29. Patient-Provider Communication References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 2) References Woods, SS, Schwartz, E, Tuepke,r A, Press, NA, Nazi, KM, Turvey, CL, & Nichol, WP. (2013). Patient experiences with full electronic access to health records and clinical notes through the MyHealtheVet personal health record pilot: qualitative study J Med Internet Res. 15(3):e65. http://www.jmir.org/2013/3/e65/ Wuerdeman, L, Volk, L, Pizziferrri, L, Tsurikova, R, Harris, C, Feygin, R, Epstein, M, Meyers, K, Wald, JS, Lansky, D, & Bates, DW. (2005). How accurate is information that patients contribute to their electronic health record? AMIA 2005 Symposium Proceedings. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16779157?dopt=Citation . 29
  • 30. Patient-Provider Communication References – Lecture c (Cont’d – 3) Charts, Tables, Figures 5.10 Figure: Weiner, J. (2012). Figure 1. Physician / patient communication in the “e- health” context’. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1(33). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3461429/ 5.11 Figure: Pew Research Center. (2011). Texting popular around globe. 5.12: Figure: Manhattan Research, Cybercitizen Health U.S. (2013). Reasons for tracking health measurements. 30
  • 31. Unit 5: Patient-Provider Communication, Lecture c – Informatics Tools to Support Patient- Provider Communication This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number 90WT0006. 31

Editor's Notes

  • #2: Welcome to Patient-Centered Care, Patient-Provider Communication. This is Lecture c.
  • #3: The objectives for this unit, Patient-Provider Communication are: 1) Explain the importance, elements, and processes of patient-physician communication; 2) Discuss the concept of trust in the context of health care interactions; and 3) Describe various informatics tools and the practical considerations to support patient-provider communication. In this lecture, we will talk about informatics tools for patient-provider communication.
  • #4: This slide presents a graphic model of the digital practice infrastructure surrounding both providers and patients. This conceptual model acknowledges that the provider is no longer just a single physician or doctor group, but usually a multidisciplinary team that is either physically or virtually integrated into an organized, structured delivery system. Surrounding the provider and consumer concentric rings, the slide lays out a spectrum of Intertwined types of e-health communication tools that support patient-provider communication.
  • #5: Communication and information technology is changing rapidly worldwide. This digital revolution will have a profound impact on how physicians and health care delivery organizations interact with patients and populations. Over the coming decade, face-to-face patient / doctor contacts will become less common and exchanges between consumers and providers will increasingly be mediated by electronic devices.
  • #6: The use of digital technology has revolutionized how we communicate, providing access to health information from virtually any location at any time. 2011 research shows that text messaging has been emerging as the preferred electronic communication venue, both increasing availability of communication, but limiting the ability to provide the details of communication that are associated with a verbal conversation.
  • #7: In the recent IBM study, five out of ten students said they interact online with people they don’t already know – in other words, they use social media to reconfigure and expand their social networks into totally new areas. In fact, even before finishing college, students are joining professional social networks such as LinkedIn to establish and benefit from professional relationships.
  • #8: People are communicating through digital and social media more than ever. Even government agencies use Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Flicker, and other social media. Digital and social media are being used by consumers and health care providers, but communication preferences are changing. According to the Manhattan Research Cybercitizen Health® 2012 Study, the number of U.S. adults age 18 years and older using digital technology for health information has increased from 61 million in 2011 to 75 million in 2012. We are undergoing a digital revolution.
  • #9: The mobile health market will continue to grow due to the following factors, according to Guillemi and Benedict in 2013. There are new technologies, such as smartphones, remote patient monitoring, and social media. There is a decreasing cost and increasing acceptance of mobile health. The population itself is also a factor because the global population is aging, the median population age is increasing, and health is becoming more about chronic, instead of acute, diseases. Additionally, there is a foundation in place with a concept of “care everywhere” taking root.
  • #10: Healthcare is moving towards a precision-based model—or ‘personalized medicine’. As a result of greater understanding of the human genome, together with other personalised technologies, the industry will likely transform—as have many other industries—to one that is predictive, personalized, participatory, and preventive. mHealth will be a major factor in providing personal toolkits that will ultimately help those manage predicted vulnerabilities, chronic illness, and episodic acute conditions. Enabled by technology, connectivity and data, mass customization is on the horizon allowing mHealth solutions to flourish.
  • #11: Expectations are high that mobile technology will help to increase access to care in emerging markets and transform the developed world’s costly healthcare behemoths into less expensive, prevention-based and patient-focused systems. The surveys conducted for this research program found that although patients see relatively modest change so far, large numbers expect that mHealth will have a significant impact on how care is delivered in the next three years. The use of mobile health tracking devices among both the young and healthy, and the old and sick demonstrates high motivation to maintain or improve general well-being or prevent adverse health incidents.
  • #12: 35% of U.S. adults say that at one time or another they have gone online specifically to try to figure out what medical condition they or someone else might have. One in five Internet users have consulted online reviews and rankings of health care service providers and treatments. Thirteen percent of adults have gone online to find others who might have health concerns similar to theirs. People living with chronic and rare conditions are significantly more likely to do this.
  • #13: Some common examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication are patient portals, personal health records, and online communities. We will now talk about each and some other units in this component may also mention these tools.
  • #14: A patient portal is a secure online website that gives patients convenient 24-hour access to personal health information from anywhere with an Internet connection. Using a secure username and password, patients can view health information depicted on this slide, such as recent doctor visits, lab results, and educational materials. With patient portal implementation, a health care organization can enhance patient-provider communication, empower patients, support care between visits, and, most importantly, improve patient outcomes.
  • #15: The personal health record (PHR) is a patient-initiated electronic record that is separate from the EHR and contains information selected and added by the patient. The PHR allows the patient the ability to update and change their health information at any time, and provides the patient the ability to share this information with anyone that they choose to share with. The PHR provides a patient the most control of their health information. There are some drawbacks to this technology. Although some medical devices and wearable trackers can feed data into a PHR, very few electronic health record vendors currently interface into the PHR, leaving the patient responsible for entry and updates to information. In addition, providers cannot send information directly into most PHR products, leaving the patient to enter the updates.
  • #16: Online patient communities provide technology tools that support patient to patient communication, and provide helpful information to guide patients in more effective communication with their providers. The web site PatientsLikeMe, a site dedicated to providing a space for over 250,000 members to communicate with each other and share personal health experiences, launched a 2014 campaign called “Data for Good”. This campaign is designed to encourage health data sharing to advance research, and to change medicine. In a recent study focused on sleep issues, PatientsLikeMe was able to pull from its platform of more than five-years’ worth of data to analyze over 184,000 symptom reports. The company was then able to run an additional member survey to collect additional data, receiving more than 5,000 responses in less than two weeks.
  • #17: There are some practical considerations for supporting informatics and technology to facilitate patient-provider communication. Access to information, health literacy, privacy and security, and culture change are key factors and will be discussed in this lecture.
  • #18: Empowered patients and caregivers can share decision-making with their health care providers through better health literacy and input to their medical record throughout the care continuum. Health literacy is defined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information needed to make appropriate health decisions and services needed to prevent or treat illness”.
  • #19: This slide represents the range of tools supporting patient-provide communication along the continuum of patient care, with the use of digital and mobile communications used after the active phase of patient care to monitor and promote adherence to therapy.
  • #20: There are resources on health literacy from a number of organizations such as AHRQ, AARP, and the Informed Medical Decisions Foundation.
  • #21: Now, patients may have access to their records. A research study by Woods, Schwartz, Tuepker, et al in 2013, identified four themes that characterized patient experiences with reading the full complement of their health information. When seeing their records, patients felt that their communication with providers and health care systems was positively affected. Access also enhanced knowledge of their own health, improved self-care, and allowed for greater participation in the quality of their care, such as follow-up of abnormal test results or decision-making on when to seek care. While some patients felt that seeing previously undisclosed information, derogatory language, or inconsistencies in their notes caused challenges, they overwhelmingly felt that having more, rather than less, of their health record information provided benefits. Another study looked at patient- and provider-related outcomes after the implementation of OpenNotes. What researchers found was that most patients felt more in control after reading their doctors’ notes. Also, a majority reported increased medication adherence. Less than five percent of physicians reported longer visits and no more than a third of providers reported changing their documentation content or that it took longer to write notes. At the end of the experiment, 99 percent of the patients wanted OpenNotes to continue and no doctor elected to stop OpenNotes.
  • #22: Not only can it be helpful for patients to access their health record, but patients’ information that they contribute could also be valuable. This is because the longitudinal medical record, or LMR, is often incomplete. So patient-reported data is a promising source of general health information. They can provide information about tests and quality of life, for example. Patients should have access to their information, assist with recording information, and help with quality assurance of the information. By doing this, it will help increase communication between patients and providers.
  • #23: Privacy and security of health information are important, but also how patients perceive such information is protected is also essential. According to a study done by Hughes, Patel, and Pritts in 2014, individuals who strongly disagree that health care providers have reasonable protections in place for EHRs are over 8 times more likely to have withheld information from their provider compared to those who strongly agree. Compared to the overall population, individuals who strongly disagree that health care providers have reasonable protections in place for EHRs are almost 5 times more likely to have withheld information from their provider. So if a person does not believe that their health information is protected for privacy and security, they are less likely to share information. For more information on ensuring the privacy and security of information shared, please see component 22, unit 10.
  • #24: Introduction of electronic means of promoting patient-provider communication resulted in culture change and a need for clinicians to adopt to the expectations of new generation of health consumers. For example, a provider could say, “If you don’t mind, I am going to be typing as you speak. I’m happy to show you what I’m writing” or “I’m going to look up your test results. Would you like to look at them together?”. It is important to consider how socially-stigmatizing health conditions are documented and to be sensitive to patient perceptions. However, by engaging the patient to communicate with the provider, it could improve management of chronic disease and mental illness and encourage patient-provider collaboration.
  • #25: This slide represents major themes to address when electronic tools for patient-provider communication are being implemented. Partnering with patients represents a significant change in culture that must be addressed during each contact between provider and patient. Listening to the patient allows them the opportunity to participate in their care, and can provide information and insights that may not be gained when talking. Both patients and providers need to learn the skills of engaging with each other, a significant part of changing the health care culture. Patient engagement is also based on trust between the two parties, and as a result, patients will become more engaged and invested in improving their own health.
  • #26: This concludes Lecture c of Patient-Provider Communication. To summarize, digital technology changed how patients and providers communicate. Mobile health and self-tracking of general well-being are examples and contributors of this manifestation. We talked about examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication, such as patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities. There are practical considerations for implementing such tools like, data access, health literacy, privacy and security, and culture. However, providing patients access to their medical record and collaborating with them to contribute to their medical record could improve their care.
  • #27: This concludes Unit 5, Patient-Provider Communication. The summary of this unit is providers with good communication skills identify patients’ problems more accurately and their patients adjust better psychologically and are more satisfied with their care. Effective methods of communication skills are available and the opportunity to practice them is essential. Listen carefully to patients, treat them respectfully, be honest and consistent, follow through on commitments, and have an accepting attitude. Digital technology has changed how we communicate, especially between patients and providers and examples of informatics tools to support patient-provider communication are patient portals, personal health records, and online patient communities.
  • #28: No audio.
  • #29: No audio.
  • #30: No audio.
  • #31: No audio.
  • #32: No audio.