Peak soil

1
TheWorldin2030PeakSoil
THE WORLD IN 2030
Data Taxation
THE WORLD IN 2030
Peak Soil

2
TheWorldin2030PeakSoilFutureofPatientDataInsightsfromMultipleExpertDiscussionsAroundtheWorld
Peak Soil
Soil is fundamental, fragile and finite. It impacts everything
from food and health to conflict and migration. Deeper
understanding of its degradation raises the significance of
soil to equal that of climate change and biodiversity loss.
Economic Impact of degraded soils on global GDP 10%
Carbon absorption potential of regenerative farming practises
80 = 100 bn tonnes pa

3
We know that the quality of our soil is the key to the
food we grow, the clothes we wear and the water
we drink. It recycles nutrients, sequesters carbon,
is fundamental to biodiversity, helps keep our
ecosystems in balance and is an essential part of
our general wellbeing. But, although soil represents
the difference between survival and extinction for
most terrestrial life, human activities have caused
it harm leading to compaction, loss of structure,
nutrient degradation, increasing salinity and
denuding landscapes. Furthermore, the urgent need
to preserve soil receives relatively little attention from
governments. An unsung hero of our planet, it is
fragile, infinitely important and finite.1
Why do we
treat it with such disregard?
Perhaps we just don’t notice the changes taking
place under our feet. The formation of soil
is a very slow process. Creating one millimetre of
coverage can take anything from a few
years to an entire millennium. Also, perhaps we
don’t know enough about soil to really understand
its true role. It is incredibly complex. In a mere
teaspoon, there are around a billion bacteria from
several thousand different species, a million other
single cell organisms, a million individual fungi and
hundreds of “larger” animals such as microscopic
worms and insects.2
Analysing and identifying soil
microbes is challenging. Currently less than 5%
can be isolated and captured through conventional
microbiology. Although we know that they influence
crop growth, can potentially increase yields and that
groups of microbes can do things that individual
bugs cannot manage alone, we just haven’t worked
out quite how they do it yet.
In a mere teaspoon, there are around
a billion bacteria from several thousand
different species, a million other single
cell organisms, a million individual fungi
and hundreds of “larger” animals such as
microscopic worms and insects.

4
What we do know is that around 95% of the food
we eat comes from the soil; around a quarter of all
known species on Earth call soil their home and it
is able to store one and a half Olympic swimming
pools full of water per hectare so is key to the
prevention of flooding and mitigation of drought.
Soil, particularly peat, is also an active store for
carbon.3
Indeed, in the UK, peatlands represent
the single most important terrestrial carbon store
holding at least 3.2 billion tonnes. Some argue,
to protect them from long-term damage, ongoing
farming on peat soils such as fenlands, should stop
completely.4
About 3.2 billion people worldwide are currently
suffering from degraded soils. This represents an
economic loss in the order of 10% of annual GDP.5
The highest numbers of those affected are in South
and East Asia, the Sahara region including North
Africa, and the Middle East including the Arabian
Peninsula. The reduction in crop yields due to poor
soil is expected to range from 10% to15% in these
regions. The soil in western nations is also under
threat – and has been for quite some time. In the
1930s rapid mechanisation of farming practises
combined with a series of droughts caused the Dust
Bowl in the USA. This affected around 400,000km2
of land in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Colorado
and Kansas. Other areas such as the Piedmont
Region, which stretches from Virginia to Alabama,
has lost one third of its topsoil over the last 200
years. More recently, 1300 polluted or contaminated
sites have been identified.6
In Europe, the EU
reckons the total annual societal loss from soil
degradation is about $100 billion.7
But economic loss is only part of the story. In some
areas soil degradation will increase the chance
of conflict as more peoples seek access to fertile
land. In others, more intensive farming practises
will impact the air we breathe and the water we
drink and accelerate the decline in biodiversity.
The climate will also be affected; three times more
carbon is stored in soil than in the atmosphere.
Finally, all this will have significant social impact.
Many of us visit the countryside for our physical or
mental wellbeing.
About 3.2 billion people worldwide are
currently suffering from degraded soils. This
represents an economic loss in the order of
10% of annual GDP.

5
There are multiple reasons for this. They include
poor farming practises, industrial pollution,
increasing urbanisation (and the subsequent loss
of land), inadequate governance and ill-conceived
farming subsidies. Rising population demands for
food and materials adds to the problem so in the
years ahead we can expect continued deforestation,
increasing emissions from rice and intensively
farmed ruminant livestock and the misuse of
nitrogen in fertilisers. As the planet warms, soil
erosion on degraded lands is likely to accelerate as
a result of more extreme weather events; wind and
rain account for most of this but it is also affected
by forest fires and changes in the distribution of
invasive species, pests and pathogens.
The Reasons

6
Addressing soil health is now firmly on the global
agenda. Much work has already been achieved
by international bodies such as the United Nations
Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD),
the International Soil Reference and Information
Centre (ISRIC), the Global Soil Partnership, the
Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils (ITPS)
and with regional initiatives with centres such as
the European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC) acting
as the single reference point for soil data at a
European level.8,9,10,11,12
In addition, the Global Soil
Laboratory Network (GLOSOLAN) is a result of a
unique, international collaboration led by the Food
and Agriculture Organisation’s (FAO) Global Soil
Partnership. For the first time, more than 400 labs
in 127 countries are working together to harmonise
data and methods for soil analysis so that soil data
and information is comparable and interpretable
across laboratories, countries and regions. The
biggest international effort is perhaps a French-led
initiative called “Four per 1,000”; launched at the
COP21 Paris Climate Summit, it aims to boost
carbon storage in agricultural soils by 0.4% each
year.13
There are also industry led initiatives such
as in Austria, Healthy Soils for Healthy Food, a
producer-retailer-consumer programme led by
supermarket chain SPAR with support from WWF.
This focusses on GHG sequestration through soil
carbon on agricultural land.
That said, there is much still to be done. This is
tricky because policy design and formulation is
often strongly sectoral, particularly at local level. In
the past this has resulted in ineffectual or worse,
damaging, regulation. For example, in Europe an
over-emphasis on cheap food has been an ongoing
issue; in the US government policy encouraged
farmers to specialise, but the resulting monocultures
require an increasing amount of water, fertilizer and
pesticides. In China the reliance on land transfers
to generate revenues has meant local governments
have had little motivation to manage pollution.
Finding Solutions

7
As awareness of the issues grows, some long-
established land management and restoration
practices are being questioned. These include
ploughing, monocropping and the over dependence
on pesticides or artificial fertilisers. Many are now
testing alternative practises and regenerative
agriculture. For example, in the mountainous region
of Mexico, where intensive farming practises have
caused soil erosion and decay, farmers from the
Mixte community are returning to a polyculture
system called milpa, where soil fertility is preserved
by planting black beans and pumpkin between
corn.14
Making better use of local resources, returning
organic matter to soils, and implementing more
diverse crop rotations that include legumes to
reduce the reliance on synthetic fertilisers, can
significantly benefit soil health, slow erosion and
reduce dependence on environmentally damaging
pesticides and fertilisers.15
Cover crops, no-till
methods and allowing animals to graze in a way that
mimics their natural behaviour can help to build soil,
crowd out weeds and retain moisture. Agroforestry,
which differs from traditional forestry by its focus
on the interactions between components rather
than just on the individual components themselves,
is also having an impact. In Northern Thailand
an initiative to plant perennial trees, fruit trees,
vegetables and herbs in a mixed agriculture system,
and reduce the use of pesticides, herbicides and
fertilizers, has halted soil erosion and restored
ecosystem services across 500 hectares of what
was previously maize monoculture owned by
approximately 700 smallholders.16
Farmers need greater support from policy makers
to drive meaningful change. Some are already using
incentives to gradually integrate new approaches
into mainstream agriculture. In Costa Rica the
removal of cattle subsidies in the mid-1980s,
the banning of deforestation in 1996 and the
provision of incentives to promote reforestation
and biodiversity has done much to stimulate soil
improvements. Forest cover is now up at 52% from
an all-time low of around 25%.17
Subsidies are also
being applied to good effect in the US. Over the
last 20 years, local governments in Maryland and
Virginia, have used them to encourage farmers to
plant cover crops.
More significantly regulators around the world are
looking with interest at what impact the UK’s move
to a new Environmental Land Management (ELMs)
scheme will have. Due to be piloted from late 2021,
it is designed to shift the focus from food production
to that of providing “public goods”. Instead of being
paid for owning land, subsidies will be allocated
based on “environmental land management”
and cover pest control, hedge and tree planting,
the creation of habitats and general landscape
improvement. It’s an ambitious programme that
needs careful management. Farmers operate
on tight margins and some experts predict the
upheaval could force many out of business.
As awareness of the issues grows, some
long established land management and
restoration practices are being questioned.
These include ploughing, monocropping
and the over dependence on pesticides or
artificial fertilisers.
Taking Action

8
Expect autonomous driving technologies
to be developed that produce smaller
lightweight machines. As well as being
good for the soil, a Goldman Sachs report
suggested innovations such as this will
deliver a $45bn addressable market based
on a 13% yield improvement.
Greater action is needed to reduce nitrogen run-
offs from fertiliser. Research by academics David
Kanter and Timothy Searchinger suggest that the
most effective way to achieve this is not to regulate
the farmers, but to focus instead on persuading
producers to look for alternative solutions.18
They
argue that most nitrogen management policies
already offer farmers incentives to change farming
practises by, for example, developing nutrient
management plans or using more environmentally
friendly fertilizers but, because of the sheer number
of farmers, these policies are difficult to regulate and
have had limited impact. A different approach is to
focus on the small number of actors which control
a majority of the fertiliser market and encourage
them to come up with alternative products. In
North America for example this boils down to five
companies which currently control over 80% of
the production capacity for urea, an inexpensive
form of nitrogen fertilizer, and ammonia, the main
ingredient for all types of nitrogen fertilizers.19
Four
of these already offer a more environmentally friendly
product and provide a service to help farmers use
nitrogen more efficiently. If policy makers support
these initiatives, they could also create important
economic opportunities for the industry, stimulating
the new technologies better suited to specific crops
and climates.
A major problem is that as yet the impact of
better soil practise on carbon storage cannot be
accurately measured, reported and verified (MRV),
so it is difficult for farmers to access the funds
currently pouring into carbon offsetting and ‘natural
solutions’. This notwithstanding, Australia already
has a market for carbon credits, and another has
recently been established in the US. The aim is to
persuade greenhouse-gas producers to offset their
emissions by paying farmers to sequester carbon
for them. Rather than reduce emissions themselves
companies and consumers aiming to reduce their
carbon footprint can pay farmers to do it for them.
A group of ten Canadian utilities companies have
created such an exchange and, in 2019, a group
of Iowan farmers were paid up to $3 an acre to
sequester carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous
oxide. However, initiatives such as this will only
get significant traction when there is greater clarity
around MRV.
Corporate investment is driving change in other
ways too. Earlier this year, a group of agricultural
traders and food companies, including Indigo,
Cargill, General Mills, McDonald’s USA and
Mars, launched the Ecosystem Services Market
Consortium that encourages farmers to adopt
conservation management practices. Elsewhere
new technologies are already helping large scale
farmers address issues such as soil compaction due
to the use of heavy weight tractors and machinery.
This can reduce yields by over 15-20%. Expect
autonomous driving technologies to be developed
that produce smaller lightweight machines. As well
as being good for the soil, a Goldman Sachs report
suggested innovations such as this will deliver a
$45bn addressable market based on a 13% yield
improvement. The companies that stand to benefit
in this value chain include Intel, Bosch, Delphi,
Conti, TRW, Quanergy and Case.20

9
Looking forward, increasingly available digital
technologies such as sensors, geospatial imagery,
mobile financial services and data analytics can
be leveraged to make soil healthier and agriculture
more precise, productive, resilient, and profitable.
It also lays the groundwork necessary to monitor
soil quality and composition in real time. If that
were cracked, then it would make it easier for
governments to increase incentives for the likes of
carbon sequestration. Current initiatives include
the development of deep-soil sensing technology
(with potential backing from the USDA and big-data
focused technology companies). Although this is in
the early stages of development, companies such
as CropX already offer sensors to help farmers
adjust irrigation to the needs of their soil.21
As new molecular fingerprinting, using genetic
sequencing technology, becomes more widely
available, it is hoped it will be easier for scientists
to measure and understand how combinations of
species interact and therefore determine which
chemicals will encourage some microbe species
and discourage others. More government support
is needed here. In the UK, only 0.41 per cent,
or a mere £284,000, of the cash invested in
environmental monitoring goes on auditing the soil.
This compares with £60.5m tomonitor water quality,
and £7.65m to check on air.22
More investment to enable greater understanding
of how soil works and how to map its progress
would help in other ways too. It would provide clarity
around how soil can be used to store CO2. This is
seen as a huge opportunity for mitigating climate
change. Soil that has been ploughed and artificially
fertilised has depleted soil carbon levels. Figures
vary but Rattan Lal, Professor of Soil Science at
Ohio State University estimates that since people
began farming around 50 – 70% of soil’s natural
carbon has been lost. Globally, he suggests that,
if regenerative farming practises are adopted even
depleted soils could reabsorb 80 billion to 100 billion
metric tons of carbon, reducing atmospheric, more
widely carbon dioxide by 38 to 50 ppm.23
Wider understanding of agricultural practises would
also help. Alongside financial support, small-holders,
who make up the majority of farmers across
the world, would benefit from access to better
education around regenerative farming practises in
order to drive change.24
The responsibility does not lie with food producers
alone. The public needs to be persuaded to change
its purchasing habits. Urbanisation and the long
tail of supply chains means that our collective
understanding about how food is produced and
where it comes from has diminished. In the UK a
2018 a survey showed that 42% of 18-24-year-olds
described their knowledge of the countryside as
either “poor” or “very poor”.25
Education initiatives
need to be strengthened so that people understand
the impact that their behaviour has on land – not
just the climate. In turn this could reduce the
pressure on farming and potentially allow more land
to be left for nature.
Monitoring Soil Quality
If regenerative farming practises are
adopted even depleted soils could
reabsorb 80 billion to 100 billion metric
tons of carbon, reducing atmospheric,
more widely carbon dioxide by 38 to 50
parts per million.

10
Leading in 2030
The “green revolution” that has produced a fourfold
increase in global food production since the middle
of the 20th century relied on pesticides, fertilisers,
machinery, and monocultures.26
This cannot
continue. Soil is at the heart of three significant and
interconnected global needs: feeding a growing
global population, helping to mitigate against
climate change and reversing dramatic biodiversity
losses that threaten the ecosystems we depend
upon. In 2020 this seems like a well-kept secret.
Throughout millennia we have been dependent on
soil to feed the world and in return we have denied
it sustenance. By 2030 the impact of not doing
enough may well mean, like climate change and
biodiversity before it, the consequence of unhealthy
soil will, by necessity, be on everybody’s radar.

References
1
http://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/en/c/1126974/
2
https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/event/aaas-2009
3
https://www.iucn-uk-peatlandprogramme.org/
4
https://www.rspb.org.uk/about-the-rspb/about-us/media-centre/press-releases/carbon-mapping/
5
https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2018_ldr_full_report_book_v4_pages.pdf
6
http://www.fao.org/3/I9183EN/i9183en.pdf
7
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/12/third-of-earths-soil-acutely-degraded-due-to-agriculture-study
8
https://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
9
http://www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-maps-and-databases/global-soil-organic-carbon-map-gsocmap/en/
10
https://www.isric.org/
11
http://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/en/
12
https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/global-soil-biodiversity-atlas
13
www.4p1000.org
14
https://www.dezeen.com/2019/05/30/totomoxtle-fernando-laposse-mexico-corn-circular-economy-design/
15
http://www.croataninstitute.org/images/publications/soil-wealth-2019.pdf
16
https://www.ft.com/content/cee5f3a8-21ab-11ea-b8a1-584213ee7b2b
17
https://www.ft.com/content/cee5f3a8-21ab-11ea-b8a1-584213ee7b2b
18
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-018-0143-8
19
https://www.nutrien.com/sites/default/files/uploads/2018-01/Nutrien%20Fact%20Book%202018_1.pdf
20
https://docdrop.org/static/drop-pdf/GSR_agriculture-N1sH6.pdf
21
https://www.cropx.com/
22
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51861539
23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh0TwQyw37A
24
https://forestsnews.cifor.org/8250/costa-rican-famers-beat-climate-change-by-protecting-their-soil?fnl=
25
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/23/public-losing-touch-nature-poll-suggests/
26
https://theconversation.com/can-the-earth-feed-11-billion-people-four-reasons-to-fear-a-malthusian-future-43347

12
The World in 2030
This is one of 50 global foresights from
Future Agenda’s World in 2030 Open
Foresight programme, an initiative which
gains and shares views on some of the
major issues facing society over the next
decade. It is based on multiple expert
discussions across all continents and covers
a wide range of topics. We do not presume
to cover every change that will take place
over the next decade however we hope to
have identified the key areas of significance.
Each foresight provides a comprehensive
10-year view drawn from in-depth expert
discussions. All foresights are on https://
www.futureagenda.org/the-world-in-2030/
Previous Global Programmes
The World in 2020 was published in
2010 and based on conversations from
50 workshops with experts from 1500
organisations undertaken in 25 countries
as part of the first Future Agenda Open
Foresight programme. This ground-breaking
project has proven to be highly accurate in
anticipating future change and the results
have been used by multiple companies,
universities, NGOs and governments
globally. Rising obesity, access not
ownership, self-driving cars, drone wars, low
cost solar energy, more powerful cities and
growing concerns over trust were just some
of the 50 foresights generated. For more
details: https://www.futureagenda.org/the-
world-in-2020/
Five years on, the World in 2025 programme
explored 25 topics in 120 workshops hosted
by 50 different organisations across 45
locations globally. Engaging the views of
over 5000 informed people, the resulting
foresights have again proven to be very
reliable. Declining air quality, the growing
impact of Africa, the changing nature of
privacy, the increasing value of data and
the consequence of plastics in our oceans
are some of the foresights that have already
grown in prominence. For more details:
https://www.futureagenda.org/the-world-
in-2025/
About Future Agenda
Future Agenda is an open source think
tank and advisory firm. It runs the world’s
leading Open Foresight programme,
helping organisations to identify emerging
opportunities, and make more informed
decisions. Future Agenda also supports
leading organisations on strategy, growth
and innovation.
Please contact us via:
douglas.jones@futureagenda.org
Future Agenda
84 Brook Street
London W1K 5EH
www.futureagenda.org
@futureagenda
Text © Future Agenda 2020
Images © istockimages.com and
corporate libraries

Peak soil

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Similar to Peak soil (20)

More from Future Agenda (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Peak soil