PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MITA INTERLEAVER ON HYBRID SYSTEMS USING DIVERSITY

International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC) Vol.14, No.2, March 2022
DOI: 10.5121/ijcnc.2022.14203 41
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MITA INTERLEAVER
ON HYBRID SYSTEMS USING DIVERSITY
Priyanka Agarwal1
and Manoj K Shukla2
1
Department of Electronics Engineering,
Harcourt Butler Technical University, Kanpur, India
2
REC Kannauj, India
ABSTRACT
The demands of 5th
generation communication devices such as greater throughput, coverage and reliability
cannot be easily met by any one physical media. Recently, wireless and powerline channels were combined
and diversity techniques were employed to improve reliability using only the OFDM technique. In this
paper, the hybrid system with diversity techniques is implemented and evaluated using Interleave Division
Multiple Access (IDMA) scheme. As the strength of the IDMA scheme heavily relies on the adapted
interleaving algorithm, in the paper interleaving algorithms such as Random, Tree and recently proposed
Multiplicative Interleaving with Tree Algorithm (MITA) interleavers are compared on the grounds of
computation complexity, memory occupied and bit error rate (BER). For analysis of BER, over MATLAB
environment, the hybrid system assumes Rayleigh fading channel and Additive White Gaussian Noise
(AWGN) on wireless medium and Symmetric alpha stable (SαS) noise on powerline channel. The outcome
of comparison parameters verifies the superior performance of MITA interleaver in a hybrid system over
the IDMA scheme.
KEYWORDS
Broadband Powerline (BB-PL), Interleave Division Multiple Access (IDMA), Interleavers, Multiplicative
Interleaving with Tree Algorithm (MITA) & Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC).
1. INTRODUCTION
As the 5th
generation is paving its way towards the customers, the assurance of reliability and
throughput of internet connection has embarked on the transformation of home appliances into
smart devices [1, 2]. But the wireless signals in indoor space operate in the unlicensed band and
are attenuated by reflections and interference from the obstacles in the vicinity. Also, the multiple
devices in smart homes operate in an uncoordinated fashion leading to amplification in
disturbances. Additionally, the surge in the internet-supported devices in smart homes exhausts
the wireless spectrum rapidly rendering it unable to cater to the continuous demands of smart
devices, hence a need of an alternative mechanism was felt. Broadband powerline (BB-PL)
serves as the best alternative to wireless system in providing in-home network access to devices
by utilizing powerline as a medium for the transmission of internet connection [3,4]. As the
powerline runs throughout the home area, it can easily provide reliable and secure connection to
any remote device by the use of a HomePlug, without any additional hardware costs [5]. BB-PL
may have some advantages but the random switching of appliances over the grid creates
impulsive noise that poses a huge hurdle in the performance of the powerline communication
(PLC) system. Thus both wireless and powerline communications channels face disturbances and
cannot suffice to the demands of smart home individually. A plausible remedy could be the
integration of multiple channel technologies.

42
Wireless and BB-PL network have their own pros and cons [6, 7] and recently they have been
collaborated to meet the demands of the 5th
generation by harnessing their individual benefits
through the use of diversity techniques [8-10]. Many researchers have tried integrating wireless
and powerline channel in varied aspects to attain greater reliability and throughput of internet
connection in indoor places. In [11], network-level integration was proposed to increase QoS but
due to the network management issues, unifying was taken down to the physical level as
standards for powerline and wireless channel are almost identical. In [12], powerline was
employed as a relay in conjunction with the wireless network to increase system performance
without any additional expenses. However in [13], signal over wireless and powerline was
combined using diversity techniques to enhance the system performance. Orthogonal Frequency
Division Multiplexing (OFDM) was applied to data signal for both powerline and wireless
channels, which assumed Class A noise and AWG noise respectively. Bit error rate (BER)
expression for the hybrid channel was derived for two modulation schemes i.e. Binary Phase
Shift Keying (BPSK) and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) schemes. For combining
signals Saturated Metric Combining (SMC) and Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) diversity
schemes were employed and hardware implementation was carried out. In [14], coding diversity
has been practically implemented over office environment and results show superior performance
over modulation diversity however, modulation diversity has upper hand if the data rate was
same. A modified version of the MRC technique was proposed in [15], where instead of noise
variances, noise power spectral density (PSD) was considered for determining the weight of the
link. Author Sayed, M. in [16], employed differential BPSK modulation scheme for transmission
of data bits while considering impulsive noise on both channels. A combining technique,
differential signal strength combining (DSSC), was proposed which took into account the
absolute value of signal along with the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) function. In [17], from
experimental deductions power spectral density combining (PSDC) technique proved to be
superior over coherent modulation but Average SNR Combining (ASC) scheme worked better in
situations where differential modulation was employed. The statistical modeling of the hybrid
system in home networks was presented in [18] where channel attenuation, delay, coherence
bandwidth, and time were analyzed. The real-time implementation of hybrid wireless/powerline
scheme was presented in [19] using the MRC technique.
Hybrid systems have also been evaluated for relay systems and outage analysis. The analysis of
hybrid system using a single relay channel was performed in terms of outage probability and data
rates in [20], where the performance of hybrid system was superior to the wireless and powerline
channel individually. The analysis of outage probability for wireless/powerline channel was also
carried out using diversity techniques in [21]. Leonardo, et.al [22] carried out numerical analysis
to compute and conclude that the data rates achieved via single channel was less as compared to a
hybrid channel. Another researcher evaluated the capacity of the hybrid system over PLC system
for different parameters in [23]. The results show that powerline outperformed hybrid system for
parameters such as low relay gain and small distances but hybrid system supported mobility
better than powerline, leading to a trade-off. Recently in [24], the power allocation concept was
applied and evaluated on hybrid system. The numerical analysis revealed that if power allocation
was not optimal individual systems performed better but for optimal power allocation hybrid
system was better in presence of MRC and Selection Combining (SC) diversity techniques.
However a striking similarity in the analysis of various hybrid systems in literature was the usage
of the OFDM technique owing to the negligible interference, but the impulsive noise in the
powerline channel cannot be effectively dealt with by the same. Thus in the paper to counteract
the impulsive noise in the powerline channel and interferences in wireless channel Interleave
Division Multiple Access (IDMA) scheme is implemented. IDMA scheme is a derivative of the
Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) technique [25] and incorporates the advantages of the
latter, but the distinguishing feature of IDMA is that the error-free transmission is feasible by

43
only randomizing the data bits. The rearranging of the data sequence is performed by the user-
specific interleaved and acts effectively in nullifying the effect of group or burst errors caused
due to impulsive noise. The interleaved algorithm is the heart of the IDMA technique and with
changes in interleaving sequence performance of the system varies. In literature, various
interleaves have been proposed such as Random, Tree, MITA, etc., that have been implemented
on both wireless and powerline systems but not for the hybrid system. Owning to the gap analysis
in literature, the paper proposes to firstly analyze the performance of wireless, powerline and the
hybrid system in terms of BER by employing the IDMA scheme. The diversity techniques Equal
Gain Combining (EGC), MRC, and SC are exploited for evaluation of the behavior of a hybrid
system. Also, the BER graph is plotted for Random, Tree, and MITA interleaves. Secondly, the
behavior of the hybrid system using the MRC diversity technique and MITA interleaved is
judged for varying parameter values such as iteration count, spread length, data length. Lastly,
the effect of Convolutional coding is observed on the hybrid system.
The paper is divided into section as follows: Section 2 provides an understanding of the IDMA
system and mathematical models of wireless and powerline channels. Section 3 deals with the
understanding of Random, Tree and MITA interleaver. The diversity combining techniques are
explained in Section 4 and software simulation results are plotted in Section 5. Finally the paper
is concluded in Section 6.
2. SYSTEM MODEL
The system architecture of the wired/wireless system with IDMA scheme is presented in Figure
1. The data generated at the transmitter is coded via Convolutional encoder, modulated, spread
and finally interleaved according to user specific interleaver before transmitting. The same set of
chips are sent via two different links i.e. wireless and powerline, which are combined at the
receiver according to the diversity technique, before feeding to the IDMA detector for chip by
chip detection. The IDMA detector assembly, also referred as Turbo processor [26] includes
elementary signal estimator (ESE), pair of deinterleaver and interleaver, de-spreader and decoder
and functions as a chip by chip detector. The role of ESE is to compute the mean and variance of
the received signal in order to calculate the log-likelihood ratios (LLR) which serve as the input
to deinterleave block. The deinterleaved signal from the ESE is fed to the de-spreader and
decoder block which is abbreviated as DEC. The DEC serves to compute the mean and variance
of the decoded and de-spread signal which is interleaved and fed back to ESE. The feedback loop
iterates a specific number of times and then the hard decision is made at DEC to receive the
output.
Figure 1. Block Diagram of Hybrid System

44
2.1. Mathematical Modelling of IDMA System
The IDMA system is designed for K consecutive users having length of data as N. The data of
user k, ak=[ak(1),..,ak(i).. ak(N)] is encoded by employing Convolutional Coder of rate 1/2 and
memory 2 [27] and then spreading operation is performed via a spreading sequence S=[ +1,-
1,+1,-1……] of length sl to produce sk. The resulting data is permuted using interleaving
algorithm ᴫk to produce the chip sequence xk=[xk(1),.., xk(i),..,xK(I)]. Lastly, signal from all users
is combined to transmit over multiple access channel. The received signal rk for a single channel
can be written as:
𝑟(𝑘) = ∑ ℎ𝑘
𝑘 𝑥𝑘(𝑖) + 𝜂(𝑖) (1)
Where hk is the channel transfer function for kth
user and η(i)resembles the noise of the channel.
The received signal is fed to ESE which assists in suppressing the interference and hence
improves BER performance. The output of ESE and decoders are expressed as extrinsic log-
likelihood ratio (LLR) and is given as:
𝑒(𝑥𝑘(𝑖)) = log(
p(y/xk(i)= +1)
p(y/xk(i)= −1)
) ∀𝑘, 𝑖 (2)
where input to the block is y. The LLR’s are denoted as eESE and eDEC depending on the
generation from ESE or DEC block. The stages of the iteration process are:
Step 1: Updating the values of Mean and Variance
Initially, eDEC(xk (i))=0. Then,
Then, 𝐸(𝑟(𝑖)) = ∑ h𝑘𝐸(𝑥𝑘(𝑖)
𝑘 ) (3)
𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑟(𝑖)) = ∑ |h𝑘|²𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑥𝑘(𝑖)) + 𝜎²
𝑘 (4)
𝐸(𝜉𝑘(𝑖)) = 𝐸(𝑟(𝑖)) − ℎ𝑘𝐸(𝑥𝑘(𝑖)) (5)
𝑉𝑎𝑟 (𝜉𝑘(𝑖)) = 𝑉𝑎𝑟 (𝑟(𝑖)) − |ℎ𝑘|2
𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑥𝑘(𝑖)) (6)
Step 2: Generating the LLR’s
𝑒𝐸𝑆𝐸(𝑥𝑘(𝑖) = 2ℎ𝑘
𝑟(𝑖)−𝐸(𝜉𝑘(𝑖))
𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝜉𝑘(𝑖))
(7)
Step 3: Calculating Mean and Variance of Data
𝑒𝐷𝐸𝐶𝑥𝑘(𝜋(𝑖)) = ∑ 𝑒𝐸𝑆𝐸𝑥𝑘(𝜋(𝑖))
𝐾
𝑘=1 (8)
IDMA performs chip by chip detection and the above steps are iterated for user-specified count
before performing a hard decision on the output data. The additional benefit of the IDMA scheme
is the drastic reduction in complexity as compared to CDMA system. The complexity of the
CDMA system is expressed in terms of O(K2
) per user, whereas in the IDMA it is independent of
user count and thus proves beneficial for larger user system [28].
2.2. Mathematical Modelling of Channels
In the hybrid system the two physical layers, wireless and powerline are combined to improve the
system performance overall but the two media has different channel and noise characteristics,

45
thus are configured separately. To accommodate for the multipath and fading effect in the
wireless medium, Rayleigh Fading channel scenario is considered along with AWG noise,
whereas for BB-PL channel bottom-up approach is adopted to derive the transfer function and to
account for the impulse noise Symmetric alpha stable distribution function is assumed. The signal
model given in Figure 2 demonstrates the flow of signal via wireless, (Ywireless=x*hwireless +
ηwireless) and powerline, (YPLC = x*hPLC + ηPLC) channels, where x is the input common to both
channels, hwireless and hPLC are complex channel coefficients and ηwireless and ηPLC accounts for the
interference and noise. The combiner block at the receiver operates on the principle of diversity
techniques, described in the next section, to produce a strong signal for detection.
Figure 2. Signal Model of Hybrid System
2.2.1. Broadband Powerline Channel and Noise Model
The transfer function of BB-PL channel is derived by using bottom-up strategy [29, 30], wherein
powerline is assumed to behave as a transmission line with parameters conductance G, resistance
R, capacitance C and inductance L and for deriving the connection between input and output
voltage and current of two-port network the chain parameter matrices representation is used and
it is given as:
[𝑈1
𝐼1
] = [
𝐴 𝐵
𝐶 𝐷
] [𝑈2
𝐼2
] (9)
The transfer function of network is expressed as:
𝐻 =
𝑈2
𝑈1
=
𝑍𝑜
𝐴𝑍𝑜+ 𝐵+𝐶𝑍𝑜𝑍𝑆+ 𝐷𝑍𝑆
(10)
Where Zo is the characteristic impedance, Zs is the source resistance, 𝛾 is the propagation
constant, l is length of powerline cable and parameter values of A, B, C, D are computed as [31]:
[
𝐴 𝐵
𝐶 𝐷
] = [
cosh(𝛾𝑙) 𝑍𝑜sinh(𝛾𝑙)
1
𝑍𝑜
sinh(𝛾𝑙) cosh(𝛾𝑙)
] (11)
The value of characteristic impedance and propagation constant relies on the transmission line
parameters R, L, G, C, which depend on the radius of cable. The noise in powerline channel
comprises of impulse noise, colored noise and background noise, owing to the presence of
electrical signal in the same layer and erratic switching of appliances on the network. The sudden
increase or decrease of load gives birth to impulse noise which is a major noise component and
therefore the noise model is assumed to an impulsive model. Middleton Class A (MCA) and
Bernoulli- Gaussian (BG) distribution are the most commonly used due to their simplicity but

46
recently Symmetric α-Stable (SαS) noise model is preferred for combining systems and on the
fact that even noise tail can be modeled and its superior performance [32,33]. The characteristic
function of SαS is described as [34]:
𝜑(𝑥) = exp(𝑖𝛿𝑥 − 𝛾|𝑥|𝛼
) 12)
where α is the shape parameter that lies in the range (0,2]. The values of α =1 represent Cauchy
distribution and α =2 denotes Gaussian distribution. 𝛿 is the shift parameter and the range is
defined as (−∞, +∞), whilst the extent of dispersion around 𝛿 is given by 𝛾 whose value is
greater than 0.
2.2.2. Wireless Channel and Noise Model
In the home network, a wireless signal is assumed to operate in the unlicensed ISM band at 2.4
GHz, which is frequently reflected and scattered by the objects lying in the vicinity resulting in
constructive or destructive interference at the receiver. To account for the fading and reflection in
the confined space Rayleigh fading channel [35] is considered and it is expressed as:
ℎ𝑤𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠~Ϲ𝑁(0, 𝜎𝑤
2
), where 𝜎𝑤
2
= E(|ℎ𝑤𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠|2
), where E(.) denotes the expectation
parameter. The noise ηwireless is assumed to be stationary background AWG noise and is
represented by Gaussian distribution with mean μ= 0 and variance σ2
.
3. INTERLEAVERS
Interleaving is the phenomenon of permutation of data bits according to the user-defined
algorithm to nullify the effect of burst error during transmission. Burst errors are group errors
which affect the consecutive bits in the channel and are cumbersome to remove at receiver as
occasionally the errors exceed the hamming distance. Interleaving can be accomplished based on
various interleaver designs existing in literature out of which Random, Tree are employed in the
paper along with MITA interleaver.
a) Random Interleaver (RI): The user data is rearranged randomly by using permuter indices
which is defined by the user [36]. The advantage is the independence of interleaving sequence for
various users and thus low interference. But as each user has its own interleaving sequence, too
much memory and bandwidth is required for storing and transmitting the interleaving patterns
and it increases with an increase in user count.
b) Tree Interleaver (TI): The Tree interleaver was proposed by Shukla in [37] and the purpose
was to reduce memory and bandwidth consumption. The principle is that two orthogonal
interleavers ᴫ1 and ᴫ2 are chosen randomly, which are used in generating the interleaving patterns
for other users. Thus only memory and bandwidth equivalent to two interleavers are required and
is irrespective of the number of users. The interleaver generation process is shown
diagrammatically in Figure 3.
c) MITA Interleaver: Multiplicative Interleaving with Tree Algorithm (MITA) interleaver is
recently proposed in [38] and is derived from Tree interleaver but with improved features, as
shown in Figure 4. The Tree algorithm follows the principle of 2n
users in each stage, n being the
stage count and MITA interleaver has 3x(n-1)-1 users in a stage, where x(n-1) being user count in
the last stage thus having greater users in higher levels. Secondly, as the interleaving sequences
for users in same stage are generated in one cycle, therefore number of cycles required is less for
MITA than Tree interleaver for same number of users. Next, the user interleaver in a particular
stage depends only on the past generated interleavers, whereas in MITA interleaver from second

47
stage consecutive users are reciprocal of each other, thus less cycles are required for the
generation of new interleaver at the receiver. Thus, collectively the design of MITA interleaver
is computationally efficient than Tree interleaver. From the Figure 3 and 4, it can be observed
that for a particular stage user count is different for both interleavers and the gap increases with
increase in number of stages, thus increasing computational complexity in Tree interleaver as
compared to MITA interleaver.
Figure 3. Tree Interleaving Mechanism

48
Figure 4. MITA Interleaving Mechanism
3.1. Comparison of Interleavers
The interleavers are commonly evaluated on the basis of memory required, complexity
computation and BER. The Random, Tree and MITA interleavers employed in the paper were
compared based on memory and computation complexity in this section, whereas BER
comparison is performed in Section 5. Memory required is defined in terms of storage space
needed at the base station for storing the interleaving sequences. Computation complexity is
defined as the clock cycles needed for generation of interleaving sequences for N users. The
comparison of interleavers is shown graphically in Figure 5. From the figure, it can be inferred
that even though the complexity of Random interleaver is the least but memory required is the
highest as all the interleavers are transmitted for regeneration at receiver. The memory consumed
by Tree and MITA interleaver is same but with MITA interleaver the system design is better due
to less computation complexity. Thus it can be safely inferred that for less memory requirement
MITA can be preferred over Tree interleaver.

49
(a) Memory Requirement (b) Computation Complexity
Figure 5.Comparison of Interleavers based on Memory and Computation Complexity
4. DIVERSITY COMBINING TECHNIQUES
Diversity is a tool employed for improving the performance of channels, without any increment
in bandwidth or power, by simultaneous transmission of data over multiple paths. In the paper,
two transmit antennas have been considered, one for wireless channel and the other for powerline
channel which are combined at the receiver by employing diversity techniques. At the receiver,
the combining of communication signals over varied fading paths are based on the weight of the
path. The diversity combining can be summarized mathematically as follow:
𝑌 = ∑ 𝑤𝑝𝑌𝑝
𝑁
𝑝=1 where, p denotes the paths, N is the number of paths, wp is the weight of the path
and Yp is the signal on path p. In the paper, the three commonly used diversity mechanism, Equal
Gain Combining (EGC), Selection Combining (SC) and Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) are
taken into account to evaluate performance of the hybrid system.
The reason behind adopting EGC, MRC and SC diversity technique is the simplified working
algorithm and implementation of the fore-mentioned methods. Secondly, the evolution of new
algorithms is based on the principle of either of discussed techniques. Lastly, the primitive
diversity techniques aid in analyzing the behaviour of interleavers more accurately.
4.1. Equal Gain Combining (EGC)
As the name suggests, the outcome of EGC diversity technique relies equally on the signal power
of all branches for the performance and the weight wp of all the links is same. For a hybrid
system, the two signals are co-phased and summing is done using the wp of both links as ½ and
the resultant signal is given as [39, 40]:
𝑌 =
1
2
(𝑌𝑤𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠 + 𝑌𝑃𝐿𝐶 ) (13)
The principle of EGC method is quite simple, but the performance is lower than MRC, as the
former sums all the signals equally i.e. even the weakest link has a major contribution in the
overall signal strength which can degrade the signal quality.

50
4.2. Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC)
MRC technique is the optimum method for combining the signals on different links by weighting
them proportionally to their channel gains after being co-phased [39, 40]:
𝑌 = ℎ𝑤𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠
∗
𝑌𝑤𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠 + ℎ𝑃𝐿𝐶
∗
𝑌𝑃𝐿𝐶 (14)
Where ℎ𝑤𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠
∗
and ℎ𝑃𝐿𝐶
∗
are the conjugate channel complex coefficients. The mechanism takes
into account all the signal branches and their gains i.e. the stronger signal has a larger
contribution as compared to a weaker signal. The performance of the communication system
achieved with this method is the highest, but with a liability of the knowledge of channel
coefficients.
4.3. Selection Combining (SC)
SC mechanism selects the link having the highest signal to noise power ratio by comparing all the
signals at the receiving end. Although the principle is quite simple, but the performance is lower
than MRC, as the latter sums up all the signals thereby enabling better detection of bits [39, 40].
For this method the number of paths N=1. The main drawback of this technique is that the
comparing mechanism is repeated after successive intervals, but for some time duration the
selected signal goes for detection even if it does not matches the threshold level. A trade-off
exists between the time interval and the hardware limitations, too small time interval will result in
faster scanning mechanism at will have an adverse effect on the hardware.
5. SIMULATION RESULTS
In this section, simulation results analyzing the performance of diversity schemes for hybrid,
Wireless and PLC channel are presented over IDMA system for multiple interleavers such as
Random, Tree and MITA. The effectiveness of diversity schemes was evaluated on the basis of
BER which was plotted as a function of bit energy to noise ratio (Eb/No) in dB in MATLAB
environment. For simulation, Rayleigh fading channel along with AWG noise have been assumed
for wireless channel, and Symmetric α-stable noise has been considered in powerline channel.
The noise model values for PLC channel were taken as α=1.85, 𝛿=0 and 𝛾=0.25. BPSK
modulation technique was hired as it assisted in better assessment of diversity gain. For
simulation of PLC channel over MATLAB, the following parameter values were assumed [30]:
Table 1. Simulation Parameters for PLC Channel
Parameters Values
f 100 kHz
μ 4ᴫe-7 H/m
μr 1
ε 8.85e-12 F/m
εr 3.6
σc 5.8e7S/m
a 1.12e-3 m

51
5.1. Analysis Based on Interleavers
To study the impact of interleavers on diversity gain, uncoded IDMA system was investigated for
data length=512, spreading length=8, number of blocks=100 and number of iterations of IDMA
receiver was considered as10. The diversity gain analysis has been performed for diverse
interleavers as the IDMA scheme relies on the effectiveness of interleavers. Figure 6 (a), (b)
demonstrates the effect of diversity techniques on hybrid system using Random and Tree
interleaver.
(a) Random Interleaver
From Figure 6 (a) & (b), it can be observed that powerline performs better than wireless as the
former is a wired medium and among the diversity scheme MRC supersedes the rest two
techniques as it exploits both wireless and wired signals in proportionate manner. The marginal
improvement on applying Tree interleaver becomes significant when the system is to be operated
for large number of users with longer data length. The sudden end of the graph indicates that at
the specific Eb/No the signal power is sufficient for successful detection resulting in negligible
error.

52
(b) Tree Interleaver
Figure 6. BER vs Eb/No for Wireless, PLC and Hybrid System for Random and Tree Interleaver
The next simulation was executed using MITA interleaver and is shown in Figure 7. It can be
deduced from the figure, that performance of MITA interleaver is almost same as Tree interleaver
but better than Random interleaver. The advantage of reduced memory consumption and lesser
computation for higher number of users makes MITA interleaver a preferred option.
Figure 7. BER vs Eb/No for Wireless, PLC and Hybrid System for MITA Interleaver
To provide a clear discrimination in the performance of interleavers, comparison was performed
using only MRC technique and the graph is plotted in Figure 8. The graph validates the
conclusion drawn above that MITA and Tree interleaver perform almost the same and better than
Random interleaver.

53
Figure 8. Comparison of Random, Tree and MITA interleaver using MRC diversity technique
As inferred from the graphs plotted, the MRC diversity technique provides highest gain therefore
further analysis of the hybrid system was carried out by using Maximal Ratio Combining for
figuring out optimal parameter values.
5.2. Analysis Based on Variations in Parameter Values
Analysis of Hybrid system with MRC diversity technique was carried out using MITA interleaver
for varying parameters such as data length, spreading length, iteration count and coding. The first
simulation was performed for variation in number of iterations which plays an important role in
the IDMA decoding process. For the simulation, blocks were taken as 100, data length as 1024.
From the Figure 9, it is noticed that BER performance gets better with increase in number of
iteration as the estimate of the data bit improves with larger iteration count. However there is a
trade-off, computation complexity escalates with hike in number of iterations and thus iterations
should be set to an optimum value. Another important observation drawn is that increase in
iteration count after 5 increases complexity proportionally, but with no advantage in BER. Thus
the optimal value of iteration count is 5.
Figure 9. Variation in Iteration Count for Hybrid System with MITA interleaver

54
Figure 10. Variation in Spread Length for Hybrid System with MITA interleaver
In the Figure 10, performance analysis of Hybrid system with diversity is demonstrated for
varying spread length. Spreading is employed in communications to increase the bandwidth of
the signal thus making it difficult to jam or intercept. However, large spread length will result in
bandwidth crunch and also large data increases the possibility of interference, therefore an
optimum value for spread length is of importance. From the Figure 10, it can be observed that
BER performance improves as spread length increases but not too much beyond spread length 8
due to interference. The next parameter for examination is the data length which is demonstrated
in the graph in Figure 11. Figure 11(a) illustrates the effect on Wireless, PLC and hybrid system,
and in Figure 11(b) depicts the performance of hybrid, and PLC system only so as to get a clear
portrayal.

55
(a)
(b)
Figure 11. Variation in Data Length for Hybrid System with MITA interleaver
The key observation is that as the data length increases the BER performance improves owing to
the fact that with larger data length higher is the possibility of combinations of orthogonal
interleavers and thus lesser interference. But on increasing the data length further, the
performance slightly degrades as too large signal length causes greater dispersion and
interference which surpasses the capability of improvement by interleavers.

56
5.3. Analysis on Basis of Coding Technique
The last analysis was performed to inspect the behaviour hybrid system in the presence of
Convolutional coding having coding rate as ½ and memory as 2.
(a) Random Interleaver
(b) MITA Interleaver
Figure 12. Effect of Convolutional Coding on Hybrid System for Various Interleavers

57
From Figure 12, it can be deduced that the convolution coding provides the extra gain in the
system performance for both Random and MITA interleaver, however on comparing the two
plots MITA interleaver improves the BER performance more than Random interleaver.
6. CONCLUSION
The 5th
generation has led to the revolutionary idea of home appliances being connected to the
internet, however, with increase in devices requiring uninterrupted network connection, it has
become challenging for any individual network connection to cater to demands. Thus giving rise
to the concept of integration of wireless and powerline channels. In literature, hybrid system has
been evaluated for various surroundings conditions but with the use of OFDM technique. In the
paper, the IDMA scheme was implemented on a hybrid system and to further enhance the
performance, diversity techniques were employed. As the IDMA scheme relies on interleaver for
its performance, the interleavers were compared on the grounds of computation complexity,
memory required and BER. The computation complexity of MITA interleaver is the less than
Tree but memory requirement is same as Tree. Thus for applications requiring lower computation
complexity MITA interleaver can be preferred. For BER evaluation, graphs were plotted using
MATLAB environment. The first set of simulations focussed on analyzing the behaviour of
interleavers over wireless, powerline and the hybrid channel. The performance of Tree and MITA
interleavers was almost same and the performance of hybrid system was best when MRC
diversity technique was employed. Next, optimal values of various simulation parameters such as
iteration count, spreading length and data length were computed for hybrid system using MRC
diversity technique and MITA interleaver. Lastly, the improvement in the systems diversity gain
with application of coding was presented. Thus to fulfil the demands of 5th
generation, hybrid
system with MRC diversity technique using IDMA scheme could be implemented and the system
throughput efficiency can be improved by employing MITA interleaver and convolution coding.
This work can be extended for OFDM-IDMA system for QPSK and QAM modulation schemes.
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
[1] Asif, S. Z. (2018). 5G Mobile Communications Concepts and Technologies: Concepts and
Technologies. CRC Press.
[2] Mocrii, D., Chen, Y., & Musilek, P. (2018). IoT-based smart homes: A review of system architecture,
software, communications, privacy and security. Internet of Things, 1, 81-98.
[3] Lampe, L., Tonello, A. M., & Swart, T. G. (Eds.). (2016). Power Line Communications: Principles,
Standards and Applications from multimedia to smart grid. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Prasad, G., & Lampe, L. (2019). Full-duplex power line communications: Design and applications
from multimedia to smart grid. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2), 106-112.
[5] Fujdiak, R., Slacik, J., Orgon, M., Mlynek, P., Misurec, J., Hallon, J., & Halgos, J. (2018,
November). Investigation of power line communication and wi-fi co-existence in smart home.
In 2018 10th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and
Workshops (ICUMT) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
[6] Güzelgöz, S., Arslan, H., Islam, A., & Domijan, A. (2011). A review of wireless and PLC
propagation channel characteristics for smart grid environments. Journal of Electrical and Computer
Engineering, 2011.
[7] Lin, Y. J., Latchman, H. A., Newman, R. E., & Katar, S. (2003). A comparative performance study of
wireless and power line networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 41(4), 54-63.

58
[8] Filomeno, M. D. L., De Campos, M. L., Poor, H. V., & Ribeiro, M. V. (2020). Hybrid Power
Line/Wireless Systems: An Optimal Power Allocation Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Wireless
Communications, 19(10), 6289-6300.
[9] Agrawal, N., & Sharma, P. K. (2018). Error performance of hybrid wireless-power line
communication system. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 95, 242-248.
[10] Lai, S. W., & Messier, G. G. (2010, May). The wireless/power-line diversity channel. In 2010 IEEE
International Conference on Communications (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[11] Freiderikos, V., Gaïti, D., Insler, R., Jaffre, P., Kortebi, A., Meyer & Zimmermann, H. (2009).
Piloting the home network. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 4(1), 49-56.
[12] Kuhn, M., Berger, S., Hammerstrom, I., & Wittneben, A. (2006). Power line enhanced cooperative
wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(7), 1401-1410.
[13] Lai, S. W., & Messier, G. G. (2012). Using the wireless and PLC channels for diversity. IEEE
Transactions on Communications, 60(12), 3865-3875.
[14] Lai, S. W., Shabehpour, N., Messier, G. G., & Lampe, L. (2014, December). Performance of
wireless/power line media diversity in the office environment. In 2014 IEEE Global Communications
Conference (pp. 2972-2976). IEEE.
[15] Sayed, M., Sebaali, G., Evans, B. L., & Al-Dhahir, N. (2015, November). Efficient diversity
technique for hybrid narrowband-powerline/wireless smart grid communications. In 2015 IEEE
International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[16] Sayed, M., & Al-Dhahir, N. (2016, December). Differential modulation diversity combining for
hybrid narrowband-powerline/wireless smart grid communications. In 2016 IEEE Global Conference
on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP) (pp. 876-880). IEEE.
[17] Sayed, M., Tsiftsis, T. A., & Al-Dhahir, N. (2017). On the diversity of hybrid narrowband-
PLC/wireless communications for smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Wireless
[18] Oliveira, T. R., Picorone, A. A., Zeller, C. B., Netto, S. L., & Ribeiro, M. V. (2018). On the statistical
characterization of hybrid PLC-wireless channels. Electric Power Systems Research, 163, 329-337.
[19] Sung, J., & Evans, B. L. (2018, May). Real-time testbed for diversity in powerline and wireless smart
grid communications. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC
Workshops) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[20] Fernandes, V., Finamore, W. A., Poor, H. V., & Ribeiro, M. V. (2017). The low-bit-rate hybrid power
line/wireless single-relay channel. IEEE Systems Journal, 13(1), 98-109.
[21] Igboamalu, F. N., Ndjiongue, A. R., & Ferreira, H. C. (2020). PLC-RF diversity: channel outage
analysis. Telecommunication Systems, 73(4), 521-530.
[22] de MBA Dib, L., Fernandes, V., Filomeno, M. D. L., & Ribeiro, M. V. (2017). Hybrid PLC/wireless
communication for smart grids and internet of things applications. IEEE internet of things
Journal, 5(2), 655-667.
[23] Gheth, W., Rabie, K. M., Adebisi, B., Ijaz, M., Harris, G., & Alfitouri, A. (2018, July). Hybrid
power-line/wireless communication systems for indoor applications. In 2018 11th International
Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP) (pp. 1-6).
IEEE.
[24] Filomeno, M. D. L., De Campos, M. L., Poor, H. V., & Ribeiro, M. V. (2020). Hybrid Power
Line/Wireless Systems: An Optimal Power Allocation Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Wireless
[25] Faruque, S. (2019). Code division multiple access (cdma). In Radio Frequency Multiple Access
Techniques Made Easy (pp. 45-62). Springer, Cham.
[26] Wang, X., & Poor, H. V. (1999). Iterative (turbo) soft interference cancellation and decoding for
coded CDMA. IEEE Transactions on communications, 47(7), 1046-1061.
[27] Johannesson, R., & Zigangirov, K. S. (2015). Fundamentals of convolutional coding. John Wiley &
Sons.
[28] Vaezi, M., Ding, Z., & Poor, H. V. (Eds.). (2019). Multiple access techniques for 5G wireless
networks and beyond (Vol. 159). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
[29] Varma, M. K., & Jaffery, Z. A. (2019). Broadband power line communication: The channel and noise
analysis for a power line network. International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications
(IJCNC) Vol, 11.

59
[30] Tonello, A. M., & Versolatto, F. (2011). Bottom-up statistical PLC channel modeling—Part I:
Random topology model and efficient transfer function computation. IEEE Transactions on Power
Delivery, 26(2), 891-898.
[31] Bai, T., Zhang, H., Wang, J., Xu, C., Elkashlan, M., Nallanathan, A., & Hanzo, L. (2020). Fifty Years
of Noise Modeling and Mitigation in Power-Line Communications. IEEE Communications Surveys
& Tutorials.
[32] Karakuş, O., Kuruoğlu, E. E., & Altınkaya, M. A. (2020). Modelling impulsive noise in indoor
powerline communication systems. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 14, 1655-1661.
[33] Rajan, A., & Tepedelenlioğlu, C. (2010). Diversity combining over Rayleigh fading channels with
symmetric alpha-stable noise. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(9), 2968-2976.
[34] Laguna-Sanchez, G., & Lopez-Guerrero, M. (2015). On the use of alpha-stable distributions in noise
modeling for PLC. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 30(4), 1863-1870.
[35] Stergiou, E., Angelis, C., & Margariti, S. V. (2020). Evaluation Methodology of MIMO Networks
Performance over Rayleigh Fading. International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications
(IJCNC) Vol, 12.
[36] Ping, L., Liu, L., Wu, K., & Leung, W. K. (2006). Interleave division multiple-access. IEEE
transactions on wireless communications, 5(4), 938-947.
[37] Shukla, M., Srivastava, V. K., & Tiwari, S. (2009). Analysis and design of optimum interleaver for
iterative receivers in IDMA scheme. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 9(10), 1312-
1317.
[38] Agarwal, P., & Shukla, M. (2021). MITA Interleaver for Integrated and Iterative IDMA Systems
Over Powerline Channel. Wireless Personal Communications, 1-17.
[39] Mahender, K., Kumar, T. A., & Ramesh, K. S. (2019). Simple transmit diversity techniques for
wireless communications. In Smart Innovations in Communication and Computational Sciences (pp.
329-342). Springer, Singapore.
[40] Molisch, A. F. (2012). Wireless communications (Vol. 34). John Wiley & Sons.
AUTHORS
Priyanka Agarwal is pursuing her PhD from HBTU (formerly HBTI), Kanpur, India.
She has worked as an assistant professor in different Indian academic institutions for a
time span of 3 years. She received her bachelor’s degree in Electronics and
Communications from JSS NOIDA, UPTU in 2011 and master’s degree from IIT
Jodhpur in Renewable Energy in 2013. Her interest areas include Wireless
Communication, Powerline Communication Channel, OFDM, IDMA, diversity
techniques.
Dr. Manoj Kumar Shukla is currently the director of REC Kannauj and was
associated as a professor with Department of Electronics Engineering and Pro Vice
Chancellor at Harcourt Butler Technical University (Formerly known as HBTI),
Kanpur, India. He received his bachelor of engineering in 1989 from Amravati
University while master degree in Power Electronics & ASIC design from MNNIT,
Allahabad, India in 2004. He got honoured with doctorate degree from the same
institute in 2011. He has published multiple book chapters, more than hundred research
papers in various international and national journals and conferences of repute while being reviewer in
several noted journals and conferences. He is also engaged as a member in BOS of AKTU, Lucknow,
HBTU, Kanpur and various other technical institutions. The research interests are in multiple access
schemes, modulation schemes, coding theory, diversity schemes, fuzzy electronics.

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MITA INTERLEAVER ON HYBRID SYSTEMS USING DIVERSITY

More Related Content

Similar to PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MITA INTERLEAVER ON HYBRID SYSTEMS USING DIVERSITY (20)

More from IJCNCJournal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MITA INTERLEAVER ON HYBRID SYSTEMS USING DIVERSITY