Performance appraisal comment
- 1. Performance appraisal comment In this file, you can ref useful information about performance appraisal comment such as performance appraisal comment methods, performance appraisal comment tips, performance appraisal comment forms, performance appraisal comment phrases … If you need more assistant for performance appraisal comment, please leave your comment at the end of file. Other useful material for you: • performanceappraisal123.com/1125-free-performance-review-phrases • performanceappraisal123.com/free-28-performance-appraisal-forms • performanceappraisal123.com/free-ebook-11-methods-for-performance-appraisal I. Contents of getting performance appraisal comment ================== When it is performance appraisal time, many managers and HR leaders contemplate adding 360- degree feedback to the process. We hear, “Wouldn’t it be great if we included feedback from peers, direct reports, and others to get a better picture of an individual’s overall performance?” Yes! We won’t debate the continual argument of whether organizations should use 360s for appraisal. But, beware. Below are just a few of the items to consider when determining if your organization is ready to use 360 feedback for performance appraisal: 4-out-of-5-stars1 1. 360-degree feedback is an add-on. A 360 survey is good for measuring competencies, not operational metrics. Measurable competencies include areas like communication, innovation, and decision-making. It may not be a good tool for peers or direct reports to evaluate whether the individual accomplished KPIs or other business metrics. The manager may be the only person able to assess those areas; you will still need to use a separate form or set of questions to capture that information. Don’t think that you can kill two birds with one stone. 2. Consider your culture. If you have never used 360 surveys in your organization before and there is a low-trust environment, don’t start the 360 process with performance appraisals. Instead, use 360 feedback for development with your senior leaders first, and then roll it out over a period of time until the culture is ready to use it with appraisals. 3. Decide how to use the results. Don’t tie the 360 score to the evaluation during the first year! Instead, include the goals from the resultant action plan as part of the performance
- 2. appraisal for the next year. This way, you are evaluating the completion of the goals, as opposed to a change in scores. Over time, the scores can be incorporated as part of the overall appraisal score. Remember, 360 appraisal results compliment the review, but do not a replace the current process. 4. It will take more time. Because you will gather feedback from multiple people, each employee could take up to 10 surveys each. You also need to budget time to decide who will provide feedback to whom. To make the process more efficient, use a short survey (20-35 items) and restrict the number of raters for each person to five to ten. The downside is that you will reduce the number of questions and raters a developmental 360 typically provides. 5. You will spend more. This is not a cheap replacement for your evaluation process (and software system). You will need to purchase a good software tool or partner with a 360 survey provider. If you use a do-it-yourself software tool, be prepared to spend much more time on the entire process. Service providers run the entire process for you and save you valuable time, while increasing confidentiality and accuracy. 6. Train your managers. How do you plan to teach people about the 360 process and provide performance-related feedback? What happens after someone receives their 360 feedback results is the most important part of the process. Managers will need to know how to interpret the results and coach their employees to create a personal development plan. Bottom line: If you are only looking to simplify the performance appraisal process and save money, then 360 feedback is not the answer. But is it worth it? It certainly can be, if done correctly. Organizations that implement 360-degree feedback as part of their performance appraisal process report higher levels of completion, fairer evaluations, increased accountability, more personal growth, and a more open corporate culture. If you have used 360 feedback for performance appraisal, what has been your experience? What other advice would you give? ================== III. Performance appraisal methods
- 3. 1.Ranking Method The ranking system requires the rater to rank his subordinates on overall performance. This consists in simply putting a man in a rank order. Under this method, the ranking of an employee in a work group is done against that of another employee. The relative position of each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It may also be done by ranking a person on his job performance against another member of the competitive group. Advantages of Ranking Method i. Employees are ranked according to their performance levels. ii. It is easier to rank the best and the worst employee. Limitations of Ranking Method i. The “whole man” is compared with another “whole man” in this method. In practice, it is very difficult to compare individuals possessing various individual traits. ii. This method speaks only of the position where an employee stands in his group. It does not test anything about how much better or how much worse an employee is when compared to another employee. iii. When a large number of employees are working, ranking of individuals become a difficult issue. iv. There is no systematic procedure for ranking individuals in the organization. The ranking system does not eliminate the possibility of snap judgements. 2. Rating Scale Rating scales consists of several numerical scales representing job related performance criterions such as dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc. Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total numerical scores are computed and final conclusions are derived. Advantages – Adaptability, easy to use, low cost, every type of job can be evaluated, large number of employees covered, no formal training required. Disadvantages – Rater’s biases
- 4. 3. Checklist method Under this method, checklist of statements of traits of employee in the form of Yes or No based questions is prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or checking and HR department does the actual evaluation. Advantages – economy, ease of administration, limited training required, standardization. Disadvantages – Raters biases, use of improper weighs by HR, does not allow rater to give relative ratings 4. Critical Incidents Method The approach is focused on certain critical behaviors of employee that makes all the difference in the performance. Supervisors as and when they occur record such incidents. Advantages – Evaluations are based on actual job behaviors, ratings are supported by descriptions, feedback is easy, reduces recency biases, chances of subordinate improvement are high. Disadvantages – Negative incidents can be prioritized, forgetting incidents, overly close supervision; feedback may be too much and may appear to be punishment. 5. Essay Method
- 5. In this method the rater writes down the employee description in detail within a number of broad categories like, overall impression of performance, promoteability of employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of performing jobs, strengths and weaknesses and training needs of the employee. Advantage – It is extremely useful in filing information gaps about the employees that often occur in a better-structured checklist. Disadvantages – It its highly dependent upon the writing skills of rater and most of them are not good writers. They may get confused success depends on the memory power of raters. 6. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales statements of effective and ineffective behaviors determine the points. They are said to be behaviorally anchored. The rater is supposed to say, which behavior describes the employee performance. Advantages – helps overcome rating errors. Disadvantages – Suffers from distortions inherent in most rating techniques. III. Other topics related to Performance appraisal comment (pdf download) • Top 28 performance appraisal forms • performance appraisal comments • 11 performance appraisal methods • 25 performance appraisal examples • performance appraisal phrases • performance appraisal process • performance appraisal template • performance appraisal system • performance appraisal answers • performance appraisal questions • performance appraisal techniques • performance appraisal format • performance appraisal templates
- 6. • performance appraisal questionnaire • performance appraisal software • performance appraisal tools • performance appraisal interview • performance appraisal phrases examples • performance appraisal objectives • performance appraisal policy • performance appraisal letter • performance appraisal types • performance appraisal quotes • performance appraisal articles