Post 7. comparative and non comparative evaluation in educational technology
Download as PPT, PDF2 likes711 views
The document summarizes two studies: 1. A comparative study that compared student satisfaction and learning outcomes between online and face-to-face courses. It found that while both groups were satisfied, face-to-face students had more positive views of interaction and support. 2. A non-comparative study that examined how a computer system called KnowCat helped develop students' metacognitive knowledge. Interviews found that KnowCat improved students' awareness of learning processes and strategies.
Post 7. comparative and non comparative evaluation in educational technology
- 1. Done By: Murtadha ALAjmi 68691 Hussian ALAjmi 68710 Mazin Al-Maqrashi 68698 Submitted to : Dr. Alaa Sadik comparative and non-comparative study evaluation
- 2. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The Comparative study : “ Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face Learning Environments” Study Title Disadvantages Results
- 3. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The Comparative study : Comparing an online course with an equivalent course taught in a traditional face-to-face format. Comparisons included student ratings of instructor and course quality; assessment of course interaction, structure, and support; and learning outcomes such as course projects, grades, and student self-assessment of their ability to perform various ISD tasks. Study Purpose Disadvantages Results
- 4. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The Comparative study : - What differences exist in satisfaction with the learning experience of students enrolled in online versus face-to-face learning environments? - What differences exist in student perceptions of student/instructor interaction, course structure, and course support between students enrolled in online versus face-to-face learning environments? - What differences exist in the learning outcomes (i.e., perceived content knowledge, quality of course projects, and final course grades) of students enrolled in online versus face-to-face learning environments? Study Questions Disadvantages Results
- 5. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The Comparative study : - The university’s Instructor and Course Evaluation System (ICES) was used to obtain general student perceptions of the quality of their learning experience. - The Course Interaction, Structure, and Support (CISS) instrument which is a hybrid instrument of: The Distance and Open Learning Scale (DOLES) instrument was used to assess student perceptions of their learning experience. The Dimensions of Distance Education (DDE) instrument which provides a further assessment of the learning environment. Study Instrument Disadvantages Results
- 6. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The Comparative study : More than one instrument was used to collect data. Advantages Disadvantages Results
- 7. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Study Purpose The Comparative study : Only tools for quantitative analysis were used without using of any type of qualitative analysis tools. Disadvantages Disadvantages Results Advantages
- 8. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Study Purpose The Comparative study : Student Satisfaction: On the student satisfaction indicators, instructor quality and course quality, both groups provided positive ratings, although the face-to-face group displayed more positive views than the online group. Perceptions of course interaction, structure & support: Overall, both groups of students had positive perceptions, with the face-to-face students having significantly more positive views for interaction and support. Results Results Advantages Disadvantages
- 9. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The non-Comparative study : “ Evaluation of the development of metacognitive knowledge supported by the knowcat system “ Study Title Disadvantages Results
- 10. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The non-Comparative study : to examine the development of the metacognitive knowledge of a group of higher education students who participated actively in an experiment based on a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning environment called KnowCat. Study Purpose Disadvantages Results
- 11. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The non-Comparative study : Firstly, how were students aware of their own and others’ learning processes developed when participating in the KnowCat educational environment? Secondly, which KnowCat knowledge elements have more incidence in the students’ awareness of the development of specific learning processes? Study Questions Disadvantages Results
- 12. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The non-Comparative study : The target instrument in this study is interview. Eighteen university students participated in a 12-month learning project during which the KnowCat learning environment was used to support scaffolding process among equals during problem-solving tasks. After using KnowCat, the students were interviewed over their work in this shared workspace. Study Instrument Disadvantages Results
- 13. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Advantages Study Purpose The non-Comparative Study : The researcher implemented both metacognitive skills and metacognitive knowledge to measure the criteria. The researcher provided descriptive instances and explained the procedures obviously. Advantages Disadvantages Results
- 14. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Study Purpose The non-Comparative Study : Using only one instrument which is interview collect data. Qualitative analysis were applied without using of any type of quantitative analysis tools. Disadvantages Disadvantages Results Advantages
- 15. Study Title Study Questions Study Instrument Study Purpose The non-Comparative study : the educational application of KnowCat can favour and improve the students’ metacognitive knowledge. The content analysis of the students’ interviews revealed the existence of metacognitive knowledge regarding the learning processes that students develop while interacting with KnowCat knowledge elements. Students showed high levels of consciousness about learning new strategies and about the conditional use of these strategies to solve specific tasks efficiently. Results Results Advantages Disadvantages
- 16. 1- The Comparative Study: http:// www.editlib.org/index.cfm?fuseaction = Reader.ViewFullText&paper_id =8371 2- The non-Comparative study : http://www.iadis.net/dl/final_uploads/200818L020.pdf References