SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Power Responsive Launch Event (June 2015)
Summary of Roundtable Discussions
A key part of the Power Responsive launch event was the roundtable sessions that took place. The aim for
this session was to give attendees the change to discuss and put forward views, under the Chatham
House rules, addressing the following questions:
 What does/doesn’t work about current DSR schemes?
 What incentivises businesses to participate?
 What barriers hold businesses back?
Below is a summary of the discussions that took place from the 3 roundtables, all views and discussion
points from individuals have been summarised and are anonymous.
A summary of the key themes from each of the roundtable discussions was presented back to the full
audience in the final session of the day and formed the basis of the Action Planning session. The output of
this session was the 4 key themes and work areas on which the Power Responsive campaign is
underpinned.
Roundtable 1 – Chair: Judith Ward (Sustainability First)
Commercial motivation
The primary incentive for businesses to participate in demand side services is the commercial gain –
savings on electricity bills and cash payment for taking part. Secondary benefits might be: gaining green
credentials; contributing to an organisation’s wider corporate social responsibility; and helping with carbon
reporting requirements. There was a strong message that the bottom line is the key motivation behind DSR
participation.
One participant suggested the potential for a scheme focused on carbon credits as an incentive. In reply,
an aggregator felt this would be difficult and referred to a carbon credit scheme they had piloted which
received no take-up, even with the aggregator sacrificing their margin.
Definition of DSR and DSR products
The phrase demand side response can be interpreted differently, which in turn can create confusion. It
would be helpful to have consistent terminology that is clear and simple to understand. In addition, clear
and simple explanations of different DSR services would help businesses understand which schemes
already operate in the market.
Awareness of DSR
There is a lack of awareness amongst businesses, both in terms of those that are participating in DSR
schemes and those that are not.
 For those already offering DSR, perhaps through an aggregator, participants stated that
businesses are often only aware of the services available for the aggregator they have contracted
with, and remain unaware of other services that are available in the market.
 For those not in the market, a lack of awareness was seen as a key barrier to entry. To build a
strong business case, which an organisation’s Board is willing to sign-off, requires a person with
knowledge and time to commit to understanding DSR and which schemes are the most
appropriate.
Provide case studies to demonstrate benefits
Providing case studies of businesses that have made the decision to invest in DSR and reaped rewards,
was identified as an easy action to take forward to help increase awareness amongst the non-domestic
sector. It was noted that the new Power Responsive website includes details of case studies.
Influencing the decision maker
DSR providers need to know which staff members to engage with in different businesses. This can vary
from company to company, so effort and resource is needed to identify who the key person to influence is,
particularly for aggregators that do not have an existing customer base.
Building an investible proposition
Participants stressed that the DSR market is highly fragmented with various schemes that require
suppliers, aggregators and other service providers to build a value proposition they can market by piecing
the individual links together. While the technology is there, further work is needed to create a stable market
framework.
Participants debated the value of DSR for business where power costs formed a modest proportion of
overall operating costs (e.g. 10% or less). It was felt that the market lacks products and services for these
potential customers who are likely to find it more challenging to develop a business case if the value
proposition is low.
Role of suppliers and sharing knowledge
Suppliers have a role in providing information and raising awareness amongst their customers of the
opportunities that DSR could provide. Similarly, those that are taking part in existing DSR arrangements
have a sectoral role to share knowledge with their supply chain.
Certainty of rewards
Several delegates were concerned with the certainty of rewards versus risks. One participant suggested a
review of the structure of payments DSR schemes – to potentially include a level of revenue for
participating as well as for times when the DSR services are used.
Application costs
For distributed generation / backup diesel, the costs of applying to connect to the distribution grid were
cited as a potential barrier. It was acknowledged the connection and export charging arrangements for
different distribution network operators varied.
Role of TRIAD
With so many participants involved in TRIADs, there was discussion about whether and how the scheme
may need to change in the future. While not intended to be a form of DSR, avoidance of TRIADs has
become the largest DSR response, which simply moves demand to another 30-minute period. The impact
of TRIAD management needs to be considered together with the development of other DSR schemes.
Summary points
The main themes reported back to the conference were:
 The key incentive to take part in DSR is the commercial benefit from the revenue generated.
 Significant work is required to demystify the DSR landscape and provide clear and simple
explanations of different DSR services.
 Efforts need to concentrate on increasing the awareness amongst businesses of DSR services,
both businesses already involved in DSR as well as business not currently active in the market.
Case studies can play a helpful role here.
 The current DSR market is fragmented, requiring service providers to make the necessary links to
build a value proposition. Even once the links are made, for some businesses the value may be
too low for them to participate.
Participants:
Judith Ward, Sustainability First (Chair)
Bindi Patel, Energy UK (Rapporteur)
Yoav Zingher, Kiwi Power
Philippa Hardy, Delta
Scott Borders, British Gypsum
Duncan Burt, National Grid
Azad Camyab, Pearlstone Energy
David Capper, DECC
Matthew Crowhusrt, Wessex Water
Steve Davis, E.ON UK
Andrew Dodson, City FM
Jo Fallows, Electricity North West Limited
Graham Flukes, Bridgenorth Aluminium
Maxine Frerk, Ofgem
Grant Holland, BOC
Martyn Newton, University of East Anglia
Andy Penneck, United Utilities
Scott Petersen, Honeywell
John Pettigrew National Grid
Anne-Marie Rosewall, Good Energy
Roundtable 2 – Chair: Eddie Proffitt (Major Energy Users Council)
Benefits versus barriers to participation
Participants broadly agreed that whilst measures were already in place to help incentivise Demand Side
Response (DSR), the benefits of participating are not always clear and are even more difficult to
communicate both internally within an organisation and externally to attract new participants to schemes.
In the long-term, the benefits of participating in DSR should encourage businesses to take it up. However,
a lack of clarity and multiple layers of existing regulations and schemes act as a barrier for businesses
participation. A market solution is required to increase the appeal of participating in DSR.
Current structure of the energy market poses a challenge
The market should drive DSR but the market itself needs to be fit for purpose. A number of problems with
the current structure of the market were stated as examples:
 Capacity Market – the mechanism requires extensive resource and the route to market is long (i.e.
there is a 12-month lead in time to the start of the auction). Also there are barriers to building a
long-term investment because the contracts are for a short period (i.e. 1 year).
 Trade-offs – current market incentives on the demand-side interact with one another so there are
trade-offs over which schemes to participate in.
 Supplier licenses – one participant noted that a supplier license and the process to obtain it is too
complicated and time consuming. The supplier licence allows a company to trade in the GB
electricity market.
 Access to pricing signal – few suppliers currently offer ‘time of use’ (TOU) incentives to customers
– this is the largest untapped market for DSR.
 Liquidity – greater market liquidity is needed to set marginally high prices. For vertically integrated
companies, the concept of suppliers competing with their own generation businesses is a
challenge – which is what DSR could be seen to be doing.
 Role of DNO’s – We need to understand local constraints. And find a way to enable customers to
be more responsive, rather than DNO’s switching generation on and off. The act of reinforcing
networks, conflicts with DSR. Understanding where problems are likely to occur in the network is
important i.e. we need to know how much solar there is on the system and where.
Suppliers may not actively facilitate DSR
For example, the six largest energy companies dominate the market. Billing systems are often ‘out of date’
and with significant changes required to enable TOU tariffs and DSR. Access to data for DSR participants
is also limited.
The benefits of DSR are not clear
DSR does not fit easily into the raft of existing products on the energy market, which mostly incentivise
electricity generation, when flexibility should be rewarded. DSR is more than just balancing the market.
The wholesale market should drive DSR.
Regulatory burden on businesses
Some businesses, particularly those captured under threshold for schemes such as the Carbon Reduction
Commitment and also compliance with environmental standards such as ISO1400, see participation in
DSR as yet another burden on businesses. Additionality is a challenge for businesses - making the case to
do more and go beyond what they are already required to do. At the moment DSR just looks like another
burden, and not an incentive.
Bankability is not evident
A long-term view of the value chain for participation DSR is needed to ensure any investment is bankable.
This would also make the case for participation easier to sell internally i.e. to company plant managers and
chief financial officers. Long-term certainty is lacking and there are limited numbers to work with. Some
also raised the point that at present only TRIADs have a signal. Other flexibility actions need to be valued
and if up-front investment needed, also be ‘bankable’. Whilst long-term certainty is needed this should be
coupled with near-term commitments i.e. STOR to be six seasons.
Clearer communication is needed
At present the language in which DSR is communicated is too complicated and technical. It needs to be
simplified to make it more attractive. Power responsive could be used as a means to reach out to a
broader audience.
Customer led approach
Some participants felt there is a risk of undue regulatory oversight of aggregators. Consumers should be
left to drive change because they do it well. TRIADs are an example of customer driven success.
Innovation
DSR is currently dominated by distributed generation and by TRIAD load shedding. There is a need for
market innovation. All parts of the demand curve should be considered not just peak demand. It was
suggested that currently it is the slowest mover that dictates the pace of everyone else. Incentives to help
first movers need to be put in place.
Summary points
The main themes reported back to the conference were:
 Need to raise awareness and improve communications, including using less technical / industry
language.
 The challenge should not be left to National Grid. The market ought to be leading to demand-side
response, if price signals are high enough, companies will start to respond.
 The market is highly regulated (with subsidies for low carbon generation and capacity), which may
act against a market-based solution.
 There is a lack of long-term certainty. It can take up to 12 months between first getting involved in
DSR to directly providing a service.
 DNOs can also create a barrier to the use of onsite generation, due to export limits driven by lack
of network capacity at a particular location.
Participants:
Eddie Proffitt, Major Energy Users Council (Chair)
Amisha Patel, Energy Industries Council (Rapporteur)
Kirsten Abbott, Southern Water
Paul Crewe, J Sainsburys Plc
Mark Draper, Peak Gen Power
Bobbie Jenkins, British Polythene Industries Plc
Ed Knox, Anglian Water
Alastair Martin, Flexitricity
Michael McGowan, Ibstock Brick Ltd
Pieter-Jan Mermans, Restore
Jim McOmish, SP Energy
John Moors, Ameresco
Rachel Morfill, National Grid
Gillian Owen, Energy Institute, UCL
Kruti Patel, DECC
Nicola Paton, National Grid
Michael Phelan, Endeco
Ashley Philips, Haven Power
Arthur Probert, Ameresco
Ian Tal, UK Power Reserve
Aily Armav-Bigg, Utilidex
Graz McDonald, Green Frog
Roundtable 3 – Chair: Dan Roberts (Frontier Economics)
Demand-side response already happens
DSR already happens today, and is now beginning to take different forms: not just reducing electricity load
at peak-times, but also increasing load when demand is low and providing other flexibility services. DSR is
contributing at both national and local scales. Currently, the majority of DSR is diesel generation.
Industrial & Commercial (I&C) customers are active
Many I&C customers (particularly major energy users) already play an active demand-side role. Reducing
electricity use at peak times through energy efficiency and shifting activities to cheaper periods such as at
night. There is also response to transmission charges (TRIADs) and time-related distribution charges (‘red
zones’). Some actively participate in schemes for frequency response and short-term operating reserve
(STOR). The public sector also has a procurement framework to encourage DSR with some large
institutions involved.
Risks / rewards
Businesses participate in DSR for financial gain, weighing the upfront and on-going costs/risks against
returns from reduced bills and directly from schemes. In cases where power is a core business cost,
participation often makes sense (e.g. supermarkets, water companies, industrial customers). But for
businesses where power is not a core cost, the economics may not stack up.
Signal from the market / long-term incentives
There was significant discussion about: the extent to which DSR should be supported by direct incentives
(socialised across all customers) or through market signals (which are a function of the way markets have
been constructed); and where risks should sit (i.e. customers, suppliers, distribution network operators,
National Grid). Although direct incentives give businesses greater confidence to invest (as per the Feed-in
Tariff), it was suggested that costs are likely to be higher overall. Some participants felt that the market
signal is not currently strong enough, as peaks are suppressed by an oversupply of capacity. This is likely
to change in future. Business customers need reliable, appropriate financial mechanisms – not excessive,
but based on the value market actors get in return.
Uncertainty of payback
Businesses need confidence of payback in order to invest. The longer-term outlook for the market and
DSR is uncertain. Wholesale prices are likely to be more volatile. Today businesses can make some
simple assumptions (e.g. high peak prices, low prices at night), but this is changing with the impact of
intermittent generation. Electricity regimes change over time. There is a lack of forward scenarios for DSR.
If a business installs low energy light bulbs – it is straightforward to predict return on investment, with DSR
schemes it is not as simple. For businesses, a stable investment environment is more important than the
prospect of a high but uncertain reward for DSR products.
Longevity of DSR products
Uncertainty in the products was illustrated by a supplier using TRIADs: as businesses avoid TRIADs, the
costs are smeared across the remaining customers (including SMEs and households), as more customers
avoid the costs, they are spread over a smaller group, which is ultimately unsustainable, so the approach
will have to change eventually. Therefore, how can businesses invest with confidence? It was also noted
that the STOR price has reduced considerably in the last 5 years. There may be further price impacts as a
result of interactions between different schemes.
Getting the Terms and Conditions right
Often it is the detailed design of schemes, and ‘onerous’ terms and conditions that create a barrier for
business participation in DSR. It was suggested that for many schemes the rules have been written with
power stations in mind and DSR is an after-thought. For example, the capacity market offers 1-year
contracts for DSR and 15 years for new generation. It is vital ensure that schemes do not discriminate
between technologies.
Few products for demand increase
It was suggested that there are currently limited incentives available to increase demand at times of low
demand/high renewable output – the market infrastructure is not currently there, other than for frequency
response, and basic incentives to shift activities off-peak.
DSR needs to be customer led
DSR is currently seen as an energy industry problem, rather than a customer opportunity. For many
businesses customers, energy is not core. Therefore it would be helpful to look again at the opportunities
for DSR starting with the customer perspective. Business should be offered the option of a soft entry to
DSR markets, in order to build confidence – give it a try, prove the technology – then go to next level.
Lack of awareness
Many businesses do not understand what DSR is and what the opportunities are. Some businesses are
nervous – such as doctors in hospitals, even though their back-up generation assets are well developed –
so they need constant reassurance. National awareness raising and education is needed.
Communicating the opportunity within business
It is often difficult to find the right person in a business to discuss DSR opportunities. The people who buy
energy are not necessarily the people who manage it. Some companies do not have energy teams.
Interfering with operational plant can be difficult as staff members are often focussed on productivity and
compliance. DSR contracts need to be designed simply enough for estate managers to sign them off. For
most supermarket store managers turning off equipment for TRIADs is not a priority – so this needs may
need automation.
Automation can help
DSR has proved more successful when automated than when relying on people to respond and make
changes. New technologies will enable this.
Products are complex and confusing
Businesses suggested that DSR products today are vastly confusing. Different customers could be doing
the same thing, but getting significantly different prices because of who they have contracted with, when
and under what terms. There is a lot of confusion. An aggregator suggested that even they are not
simplifying things enough for the customer. Further work is needed in this area.
Value needs to be stacked
There was discussion as to whether or not there is sufficient value in the market for DSR to happen at
scale, how this value could be unlocked and what barriers stand in the way. Some participants felt that the
value is there but stable access is needed. Others highlighted the importance of stacking value from
different parts of the market. A business customer suggested that it would be helpful to have one product
that gives access to different markets. Aggregators and suppliers suggested that this is a service they can
provide for business customers today.
Customer ability to participate
Even where there is willingness to respond to signals some customers cannot. A supplier explained that in
a sample of ten customer responses to TRIADs – three reduced demand by 10%, four did nothing, three
increased demand – the reasons for not responding included: business critical operations, the warning
went to the wrong person, and/or they did not have the meters and technology required to respond. Setting
up the kit and operations to deliver DSR takes time and money. Some manufacturers highlighted that they
would like to participate in more DSR schemes, but they have shed so much load voluntarily that they do
not have the ability to bid in.
Summary points
The main themes reported back to the conference were:
 Education and engagement: improving coordination and accessibility of information; recognising the
split between those paying the bill and operating the kit; and providing softer ways for customers to
get involved.
 Products: knitting layers of value together; simplifying the customer proposition; ensuring rules treat
demand and generation sides equally; and considering the opportunities to incentivise demand
increase.
 Automation: is key, when we rely on people to respond, the process often breaks down.
 Certainty: customers want a certainty of payback; the value is there but it is not stable enough; we
need to give customers as much confidence as possible, including through better scenarios for the
market, whilst recognising that electricity markets change over time.
Participants:
Dan Roberts, Frontier Economics (Chair)
Clare Dudeney, Sustainability First (Rapporteur)
Charles Birchall, Fujitsu
Julie Braidwood, Crown Commercial Service
Nick Butlin, Tempus Energy
Jill Cainey, Electricity Storage Network
Hugh Conway, MEUC
Steve Crake, Northumbrian Water Limited
Yselkla Farmer, BEAMA Ltd
Nigel Fox, National Grid
Neil Gillespie, United Utilities
Richard Hampshire, CGI
John Hartley, Centrica
Martin Hills, CEMEX UK Operations Ltd
Alana Johnson, DONG Energy
Chris Kimmett , Open Energi
Glyn Lee, East of England Cooperative Society Ltd
Andy Leeson, University of Warwick
Maria Liendo, Scottish & Southern Energy Power Distribution
Sejal Mahida, DECC
Robin Morris, Moixa Technology Ltd
John Nangle, Cabinet Office
Neil O'Brien, Alkane Energy
Cordi O'Hara, National Grid
Chris Scott, Costain
Duncan Southgate, Operational Services at Siemens
Sara Vaughan, E.ON UK
Clive Walker, Network Rail
Janet Wood, New Power

More Related Content

PDF
Power Responsive DSR Conference 18th June - Summary Paper
PDF
DSR: Being Power Responsive, 18th June - Full Slidepack
PDF
Revitializing The Utility Customer Relationship
PPTX
Wrestling Marshmallows - TransGrid's 2014 Demand Management Innovation Forum
PDF
09112017 mass mkt_offgrid
PDF
Collaborating towards a national energy vision
PDF
Financing energy storage – Masterclass By Green Investment Group
PPTX
E4 l localenergy_3
Power Responsive DSR Conference 18th June - Summary Paper
DSR: Being Power Responsive, 18th June - Full Slidepack
Revitializing The Utility Customer Relationship
Wrestling Marshmallows - TransGrid's 2014 Demand Management Innovation Forum
09112017 mass mkt_offgrid
Collaborating towards a national energy vision
Financing energy storage – Masterclass By Green Investment Group
E4 l localenergy_3

What's hot (20)

PDF
Financing energy storage - Masterclass By MACQUARIE
PDF
Resilient energy workshop catapult ktn
PDF
A national perspective on using rates to control power system costs (recommen...
PDF
Can the blockchain help accelerate the energy transition in France and in Eur...
PDF
Renewable Energy - Alternative business models & funding structures
PPT
Electric Power Industry In Transition
PDF
Allan Schur Ibm
PPTX
Electric vehicle pricing - life after government incentives
PDF
Rahus Solar PPA Customers Guide V20081005 Lr
PDF
Global Energy Buyer's Roadmap
PDF
Smart Grid Operational Services Leveraging Technology To Transform Td Operati...
PDF
e-harbours-report-Point-of-Arrival-Final(1)
PDF
Anticipated areas of electricity innovation to watch in 2017
PPTX
Blockchain in Energy Forum
PDF
Blockchain in Energy Forum
PDF
IBM Plugging In The Consumer 2007
PDF
Mi 3 2011_pg_36
PDF
JEAP Article - Network depreciation and energy disruption
PPT
Day-3, Mr. Arvind Gujral, BSES
PDF
Perspectives on Energy Efficiency Opportunities and Strategies: Technology an...
Financing energy storage - Masterclass By MACQUARIE
Resilient energy workshop catapult ktn
A national perspective on using rates to control power system costs (recommen...
Can the blockchain help accelerate the energy transition in France and in Eur...
Renewable Energy - Alternative business models & funding structures
Electric Power Industry In Transition
Allan Schur Ibm
Electric vehicle pricing - life after government incentives
Rahus Solar PPA Customers Guide V20081005 Lr
Global Energy Buyer's Roadmap
Smart Grid Operational Services Leveraging Technology To Transform Td Operati...
e-harbours-report-Point-of-Arrival-Final(1)
Anticipated areas of electricity innovation to watch in 2017
Blockchain in Energy Forum
Blockchain in Energy Forum
IBM Plugging In The Consumer 2007
Mi 3 2011_pg_36
JEAP Article - Network depreciation and energy disruption
Day-3, Mr. Arvind Gujral, BSES
Perspectives on Energy Efficiency Opportunities and Strategies: Technology an...
Ad

Viewers also liked (19)

PPTX
Introduction to events management
PPTX
Are you sharing the wrong slides?
PDF
10 Commandments for Great Presentations
PDF
20 Presentation Secrets You Won't Find Elsewhere
PPTX
Fundraising events and social media, how to #win
PDF
Gapingvoid: How To Supercharge Your Event
PDF
How Hotels Can Use Social Media to Attract Event Planners
PDF
Using Events As Content Marketing
PPT
Content Marketing for Events
PPTX
Making Presentations Better
PDF
Boring to Bold: Presentation Design Ideas for Non-Designers
PDF
PowerPoint Porn: 100 Sexy Slides [Safe For Work]
PDF
21 ways to boost your event
PDF
How to TEDx [Presentation Design Tips] - #TED #TEDX
PPT
Effective Social Media For Event Exhibitors
PDF
Presentation Secrets
PDF
7 Design Principles in Creating a PPT
PDF
7 tips to create visual presentations
PDF
Slides That Rock
Introduction to events management
Are you sharing the wrong slides?
10 Commandments for Great Presentations
20 Presentation Secrets You Won't Find Elsewhere
Fundraising events and social media, how to #win
Gapingvoid: How To Supercharge Your Event
How Hotels Can Use Social Media to Attract Event Planners
Using Events As Content Marketing
Content Marketing for Events
Making Presentations Better
Boring to Bold: Presentation Design Ideas for Non-Designers
PowerPoint Porn: 100 Sexy Slides [Safe For Work]
21 ways to boost your event
How to TEDx [Presentation Design Tips] - #TED #TEDX
Effective Social Media For Event Exhibitors
Presentation Secrets
7 Design Principles in Creating a PPT
7 tips to create visual presentations
Slides That Rock
Ad

Similar to Power Responsive Launch: Roundtables Summary (20)

DOCX
CPE7013B Oil And Gas Management.docx
PDF
Transactive Energy article 2013
PDF
Optimise your Energy Use with Demand Side Response (DSR)
PDF
Market Analysis and Business Plan for Residential Energy Efficiency Services
PDF
EURELECTRIC Views on Demand-Side Participation
PDF
Mi 3 2011 Pg 36
PPTX
A World Full of Possibilities: Integrating DERs into Wholesale Markets – Outl...
PDF
Customer-oriented Networks paper - CSIRO Australia
PPTX
Case Study: Blockchain as the Foundation of Alectra's Grid Exchange Transacti...
PDF
FEI Submission to EE Panel_26Jul2016_Final
PPTX
Systemic Biases in the National Electricity Market
PPTX
Future Design of Electricity Markets
PPTX
English Aneel Tarifas Seminario V2
PDF
Securing a yes from your CFO for your Energy Management Business Plan: DSR Ca...
PDF
Net Energy Metering, Zero Net Energy and The Distributed Energy Resource Futu...
PDF
A comparative assessment of energy management system and strategies in kanpur
PDF
01397532
PDF
Various demand side management techniques and its role in smart grid–the stat...
PDF
ACTIVE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
PDF
SSE Enterprise_KiWi_DSR_Sales_ppt
CPE7013B Oil And Gas Management.docx
Transactive Energy article 2013
Optimise your Energy Use with Demand Side Response (DSR)
Market Analysis and Business Plan for Residential Energy Efficiency Services
EURELECTRIC Views on Demand-Side Participation
Mi 3 2011 Pg 36
A World Full of Possibilities: Integrating DERs into Wholesale Markets – Outl...
Customer-oriented Networks paper - CSIRO Australia
Case Study: Blockchain as the Foundation of Alectra's Grid Exchange Transacti...
FEI Submission to EE Panel_26Jul2016_Final
Systemic Biases in the National Electricity Market
Future Design of Electricity Markets
English Aneel Tarifas Seminario V2
Securing a yes from your CFO for your Energy Management Business Plan: DSR Ca...
Net Energy Metering, Zero Net Energy and The Distributed Energy Resource Futu...
A comparative assessment of energy management system and strategies in kanpur
01397532
Various demand side management techniques and its role in smart grid–the stat...
ACTIVE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
SSE Enterprise_KiWi_DSR_Sales_ppt

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
natwest.pdf company description and business model
PPTX
Tablets And Capsule Preformulation Of Paracetamol
PPTX
The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performanc...
PPTX
Sustainable Forest Management ..SFM.pptx
PPTX
nose tajweed for the arabic alphabets for the responsive
PDF
Presentation1 [Autosaved].pdf diagnosiss
PPTX
MERISTEMATIC TISSUES (MERISTEMS) PPT PUBLIC
PPTX
Anesthesia and it's stage with mnemonic and images
PPTX
PHIL.-ASTRONOMY-AND-NAVIGATION of ..pptx
DOC
LSTM毕业证学历认证,利物浦大学毕业证学历认证怎么认证
PPTX
Self management and self evaluation presentation
PPTX
FINAL TEST 3C_OCTAVIA RAMADHANI SANTOSO-1.pptx
PPTX
Tour Presentation Educational Activity.pptx
PPTX
Human Mind & its character Characteristics
PPTX
3RD-Q 2022_EMPLOYEE RELATION - Copy.pptx
PPTX
AcademyNaturalLanguageProcessing-EN-ILT-M02-Introduction.pptx
PPTX
Relationship Management Presentation In Banking.pptx
PDF
PM Narendra Modi's speech from Red Fort on 79th Independence Day.pdf
PPT
First Aid Training Presentation Slides.ppt
PPTX
An Unlikely Response 08 10 2025.pptx
natwest.pdf company description and business model
Tablets And Capsule Preformulation Of Paracetamol
The Effect of Human Resource Management Practice on Organizational Performanc...
Sustainable Forest Management ..SFM.pptx
nose tajweed for the arabic alphabets for the responsive
Presentation1 [Autosaved].pdf diagnosiss
MERISTEMATIC TISSUES (MERISTEMS) PPT PUBLIC
Anesthesia and it's stage with mnemonic and images
PHIL.-ASTRONOMY-AND-NAVIGATION of ..pptx
LSTM毕业证学历认证,利物浦大学毕业证学历认证怎么认证
Self management and self evaluation presentation
FINAL TEST 3C_OCTAVIA RAMADHANI SANTOSO-1.pptx
Tour Presentation Educational Activity.pptx
Human Mind & its character Characteristics
3RD-Q 2022_EMPLOYEE RELATION - Copy.pptx
AcademyNaturalLanguageProcessing-EN-ILT-M02-Introduction.pptx
Relationship Management Presentation In Banking.pptx
PM Narendra Modi's speech from Red Fort on 79th Independence Day.pdf
First Aid Training Presentation Slides.ppt
An Unlikely Response 08 10 2025.pptx

Power Responsive Launch: Roundtables Summary

  • 1. Power Responsive Launch Event (June 2015) Summary of Roundtable Discussions A key part of the Power Responsive launch event was the roundtable sessions that took place. The aim for this session was to give attendees the change to discuss and put forward views, under the Chatham House rules, addressing the following questions:  What does/doesn’t work about current DSR schemes?  What incentivises businesses to participate?  What barriers hold businesses back? Below is a summary of the discussions that took place from the 3 roundtables, all views and discussion points from individuals have been summarised and are anonymous. A summary of the key themes from each of the roundtable discussions was presented back to the full audience in the final session of the day and formed the basis of the Action Planning session. The output of this session was the 4 key themes and work areas on which the Power Responsive campaign is underpinned. Roundtable 1 – Chair: Judith Ward (Sustainability First) Commercial motivation The primary incentive for businesses to participate in demand side services is the commercial gain – savings on electricity bills and cash payment for taking part. Secondary benefits might be: gaining green credentials; contributing to an organisation’s wider corporate social responsibility; and helping with carbon reporting requirements. There was a strong message that the bottom line is the key motivation behind DSR participation. One participant suggested the potential for a scheme focused on carbon credits as an incentive. In reply, an aggregator felt this would be difficult and referred to a carbon credit scheme they had piloted which received no take-up, even with the aggregator sacrificing their margin. Definition of DSR and DSR products The phrase demand side response can be interpreted differently, which in turn can create confusion. It would be helpful to have consistent terminology that is clear and simple to understand. In addition, clear and simple explanations of different DSR services would help businesses understand which schemes already operate in the market. Awareness of DSR There is a lack of awareness amongst businesses, both in terms of those that are participating in DSR schemes and those that are not.  For those already offering DSR, perhaps through an aggregator, participants stated that businesses are often only aware of the services available for the aggregator they have contracted with, and remain unaware of other services that are available in the market.  For those not in the market, a lack of awareness was seen as a key barrier to entry. To build a strong business case, which an organisation’s Board is willing to sign-off, requires a person with knowledge and time to commit to understanding DSR and which schemes are the most appropriate. Provide case studies to demonstrate benefits Providing case studies of businesses that have made the decision to invest in DSR and reaped rewards, was identified as an easy action to take forward to help increase awareness amongst the non-domestic sector. It was noted that the new Power Responsive website includes details of case studies.
  • 2. Influencing the decision maker DSR providers need to know which staff members to engage with in different businesses. This can vary from company to company, so effort and resource is needed to identify who the key person to influence is, particularly for aggregators that do not have an existing customer base. Building an investible proposition Participants stressed that the DSR market is highly fragmented with various schemes that require suppliers, aggregators and other service providers to build a value proposition they can market by piecing the individual links together. While the technology is there, further work is needed to create a stable market framework. Participants debated the value of DSR for business where power costs formed a modest proportion of overall operating costs (e.g. 10% or less). It was felt that the market lacks products and services for these potential customers who are likely to find it more challenging to develop a business case if the value proposition is low. Role of suppliers and sharing knowledge Suppliers have a role in providing information and raising awareness amongst their customers of the opportunities that DSR could provide. Similarly, those that are taking part in existing DSR arrangements have a sectoral role to share knowledge with their supply chain. Certainty of rewards Several delegates were concerned with the certainty of rewards versus risks. One participant suggested a review of the structure of payments DSR schemes – to potentially include a level of revenue for participating as well as for times when the DSR services are used. Application costs For distributed generation / backup diesel, the costs of applying to connect to the distribution grid were cited as a potential barrier. It was acknowledged the connection and export charging arrangements for different distribution network operators varied. Role of TRIAD With so many participants involved in TRIADs, there was discussion about whether and how the scheme may need to change in the future. While not intended to be a form of DSR, avoidance of TRIADs has become the largest DSR response, which simply moves demand to another 30-minute period. The impact of TRIAD management needs to be considered together with the development of other DSR schemes. Summary points The main themes reported back to the conference were:  The key incentive to take part in DSR is the commercial benefit from the revenue generated.  Significant work is required to demystify the DSR landscape and provide clear and simple explanations of different DSR services.  Efforts need to concentrate on increasing the awareness amongst businesses of DSR services, both businesses already involved in DSR as well as business not currently active in the market. Case studies can play a helpful role here.
  • 3.  The current DSR market is fragmented, requiring service providers to make the necessary links to build a value proposition. Even once the links are made, for some businesses the value may be too low for them to participate. Participants: Judith Ward, Sustainability First (Chair) Bindi Patel, Energy UK (Rapporteur) Yoav Zingher, Kiwi Power Philippa Hardy, Delta Scott Borders, British Gypsum Duncan Burt, National Grid Azad Camyab, Pearlstone Energy David Capper, DECC Matthew Crowhusrt, Wessex Water Steve Davis, E.ON UK Andrew Dodson, City FM Jo Fallows, Electricity North West Limited Graham Flukes, Bridgenorth Aluminium Maxine Frerk, Ofgem Grant Holland, BOC Martyn Newton, University of East Anglia Andy Penneck, United Utilities Scott Petersen, Honeywell John Pettigrew National Grid Anne-Marie Rosewall, Good Energy
  • 4. Roundtable 2 – Chair: Eddie Proffitt (Major Energy Users Council) Benefits versus barriers to participation Participants broadly agreed that whilst measures were already in place to help incentivise Demand Side Response (DSR), the benefits of participating are not always clear and are even more difficult to communicate both internally within an organisation and externally to attract new participants to schemes. In the long-term, the benefits of participating in DSR should encourage businesses to take it up. However, a lack of clarity and multiple layers of existing regulations and schemes act as a barrier for businesses participation. A market solution is required to increase the appeal of participating in DSR. Current structure of the energy market poses a challenge The market should drive DSR but the market itself needs to be fit for purpose. A number of problems with the current structure of the market were stated as examples:  Capacity Market – the mechanism requires extensive resource and the route to market is long (i.e. there is a 12-month lead in time to the start of the auction). Also there are barriers to building a long-term investment because the contracts are for a short period (i.e. 1 year).  Trade-offs – current market incentives on the demand-side interact with one another so there are trade-offs over which schemes to participate in.  Supplier licenses – one participant noted that a supplier license and the process to obtain it is too complicated and time consuming. The supplier licence allows a company to trade in the GB electricity market.  Access to pricing signal – few suppliers currently offer ‘time of use’ (TOU) incentives to customers – this is the largest untapped market for DSR.  Liquidity – greater market liquidity is needed to set marginally high prices. For vertically integrated companies, the concept of suppliers competing with their own generation businesses is a challenge – which is what DSR could be seen to be doing.  Role of DNO’s – We need to understand local constraints. And find a way to enable customers to be more responsive, rather than DNO’s switching generation on and off. The act of reinforcing networks, conflicts with DSR. Understanding where problems are likely to occur in the network is important i.e. we need to know how much solar there is on the system and where. Suppliers may not actively facilitate DSR For example, the six largest energy companies dominate the market. Billing systems are often ‘out of date’ and with significant changes required to enable TOU tariffs and DSR. Access to data for DSR participants is also limited. The benefits of DSR are not clear DSR does not fit easily into the raft of existing products on the energy market, which mostly incentivise electricity generation, when flexibility should be rewarded. DSR is more than just balancing the market. The wholesale market should drive DSR. Regulatory burden on businesses Some businesses, particularly those captured under threshold for schemes such as the Carbon Reduction Commitment and also compliance with environmental standards such as ISO1400, see participation in DSR as yet another burden on businesses. Additionality is a challenge for businesses - making the case to do more and go beyond what they are already required to do. At the moment DSR just looks like another burden, and not an incentive.
  • 5. Bankability is not evident A long-term view of the value chain for participation DSR is needed to ensure any investment is bankable. This would also make the case for participation easier to sell internally i.e. to company plant managers and chief financial officers. Long-term certainty is lacking and there are limited numbers to work with. Some also raised the point that at present only TRIADs have a signal. Other flexibility actions need to be valued and if up-front investment needed, also be ‘bankable’. Whilst long-term certainty is needed this should be coupled with near-term commitments i.e. STOR to be six seasons. Clearer communication is needed At present the language in which DSR is communicated is too complicated and technical. It needs to be simplified to make it more attractive. Power responsive could be used as a means to reach out to a broader audience. Customer led approach Some participants felt there is a risk of undue regulatory oversight of aggregators. Consumers should be left to drive change because they do it well. TRIADs are an example of customer driven success. Innovation DSR is currently dominated by distributed generation and by TRIAD load shedding. There is a need for market innovation. All parts of the demand curve should be considered not just peak demand. It was suggested that currently it is the slowest mover that dictates the pace of everyone else. Incentives to help first movers need to be put in place. Summary points The main themes reported back to the conference were:  Need to raise awareness and improve communications, including using less technical / industry language.  The challenge should not be left to National Grid. The market ought to be leading to demand-side response, if price signals are high enough, companies will start to respond.  The market is highly regulated (with subsidies for low carbon generation and capacity), which may act against a market-based solution.  There is a lack of long-term certainty. It can take up to 12 months between first getting involved in DSR to directly providing a service.  DNOs can also create a barrier to the use of onsite generation, due to export limits driven by lack of network capacity at a particular location. Participants: Eddie Proffitt, Major Energy Users Council (Chair) Amisha Patel, Energy Industries Council (Rapporteur) Kirsten Abbott, Southern Water Paul Crewe, J Sainsburys Plc Mark Draper, Peak Gen Power Bobbie Jenkins, British Polythene Industries Plc Ed Knox, Anglian Water Alastair Martin, Flexitricity Michael McGowan, Ibstock Brick Ltd Pieter-Jan Mermans, Restore Jim McOmish, SP Energy John Moors, Ameresco Rachel Morfill, National Grid Gillian Owen, Energy Institute, UCL
  • 6. Kruti Patel, DECC Nicola Paton, National Grid Michael Phelan, Endeco Ashley Philips, Haven Power Arthur Probert, Ameresco Ian Tal, UK Power Reserve Aily Armav-Bigg, Utilidex Graz McDonald, Green Frog
  • 7. Roundtable 3 – Chair: Dan Roberts (Frontier Economics) Demand-side response already happens DSR already happens today, and is now beginning to take different forms: not just reducing electricity load at peak-times, but also increasing load when demand is low and providing other flexibility services. DSR is contributing at both national and local scales. Currently, the majority of DSR is diesel generation. Industrial & Commercial (I&C) customers are active Many I&C customers (particularly major energy users) already play an active demand-side role. Reducing electricity use at peak times through energy efficiency and shifting activities to cheaper periods such as at night. There is also response to transmission charges (TRIADs) and time-related distribution charges (‘red zones’). Some actively participate in schemes for frequency response and short-term operating reserve (STOR). The public sector also has a procurement framework to encourage DSR with some large institutions involved. Risks / rewards Businesses participate in DSR for financial gain, weighing the upfront and on-going costs/risks against returns from reduced bills and directly from schemes. In cases where power is a core business cost, participation often makes sense (e.g. supermarkets, water companies, industrial customers). But for businesses where power is not a core cost, the economics may not stack up. Signal from the market / long-term incentives There was significant discussion about: the extent to which DSR should be supported by direct incentives (socialised across all customers) or through market signals (which are a function of the way markets have been constructed); and where risks should sit (i.e. customers, suppliers, distribution network operators, National Grid). Although direct incentives give businesses greater confidence to invest (as per the Feed-in Tariff), it was suggested that costs are likely to be higher overall. Some participants felt that the market signal is not currently strong enough, as peaks are suppressed by an oversupply of capacity. This is likely to change in future. Business customers need reliable, appropriate financial mechanisms – not excessive, but based on the value market actors get in return. Uncertainty of payback Businesses need confidence of payback in order to invest. The longer-term outlook for the market and DSR is uncertain. Wholesale prices are likely to be more volatile. Today businesses can make some simple assumptions (e.g. high peak prices, low prices at night), but this is changing with the impact of intermittent generation. Electricity regimes change over time. There is a lack of forward scenarios for DSR. If a business installs low energy light bulbs – it is straightforward to predict return on investment, with DSR schemes it is not as simple. For businesses, a stable investment environment is more important than the prospect of a high but uncertain reward for DSR products. Longevity of DSR products Uncertainty in the products was illustrated by a supplier using TRIADs: as businesses avoid TRIADs, the costs are smeared across the remaining customers (including SMEs and households), as more customers avoid the costs, they are spread over a smaller group, which is ultimately unsustainable, so the approach will have to change eventually. Therefore, how can businesses invest with confidence? It was also noted that the STOR price has reduced considerably in the last 5 years. There may be further price impacts as a result of interactions between different schemes. Getting the Terms and Conditions right Often it is the detailed design of schemes, and ‘onerous’ terms and conditions that create a barrier for business participation in DSR. It was suggested that for many schemes the rules have been written with power stations in mind and DSR is an after-thought. For example, the capacity market offers 1-year contracts for DSR and 15 years for new generation. It is vital ensure that schemes do not discriminate between technologies.
  • 8. Few products for demand increase It was suggested that there are currently limited incentives available to increase demand at times of low demand/high renewable output – the market infrastructure is not currently there, other than for frequency response, and basic incentives to shift activities off-peak. DSR needs to be customer led DSR is currently seen as an energy industry problem, rather than a customer opportunity. For many businesses customers, energy is not core. Therefore it would be helpful to look again at the opportunities for DSR starting with the customer perspective. Business should be offered the option of a soft entry to DSR markets, in order to build confidence – give it a try, prove the technology – then go to next level. Lack of awareness Many businesses do not understand what DSR is and what the opportunities are. Some businesses are nervous – such as doctors in hospitals, even though their back-up generation assets are well developed – so they need constant reassurance. National awareness raising and education is needed. Communicating the opportunity within business It is often difficult to find the right person in a business to discuss DSR opportunities. The people who buy energy are not necessarily the people who manage it. Some companies do not have energy teams. Interfering with operational plant can be difficult as staff members are often focussed on productivity and compliance. DSR contracts need to be designed simply enough for estate managers to sign them off. For most supermarket store managers turning off equipment for TRIADs is not a priority – so this needs may need automation. Automation can help DSR has proved more successful when automated than when relying on people to respond and make changes. New technologies will enable this. Products are complex and confusing Businesses suggested that DSR products today are vastly confusing. Different customers could be doing the same thing, but getting significantly different prices because of who they have contracted with, when and under what terms. There is a lot of confusion. An aggregator suggested that even they are not simplifying things enough for the customer. Further work is needed in this area. Value needs to be stacked There was discussion as to whether or not there is sufficient value in the market for DSR to happen at scale, how this value could be unlocked and what barriers stand in the way. Some participants felt that the value is there but stable access is needed. Others highlighted the importance of stacking value from different parts of the market. A business customer suggested that it would be helpful to have one product that gives access to different markets. Aggregators and suppliers suggested that this is a service they can provide for business customers today.
  • 9. Customer ability to participate Even where there is willingness to respond to signals some customers cannot. A supplier explained that in a sample of ten customer responses to TRIADs – three reduced demand by 10%, four did nothing, three increased demand – the reasons for not responding included: business critical operations, the warning went to the wrong person, and/or they did not have the meters and technology required to respond. Setting up the kit and operations to deliver DSR takes time and money. Some manufacturers highlighted that they would like to participate in more DSR schemes, but they have shed so much load voluntarily that they do not have the ability to bid in. Summary points The main themes reported back to the conference were:  Education and engagement: improving coordination and accessibility of information; recognising the split between those paying the bill and operating the kit; and providing softer ways for customers to get involved.  Products: knitting layers of value together; simplifying the customer proposition; ensuring rules treat demand and generation sides equally; and considering the opportunities to incentivise demand increase.  Automation: is key, when we rely on people to respond, the process often breaks down.  Certainty: customers want a certainty of payback; the value is there but it is not stable enough; we need to give customers as much confidence as possible, including through better scenarios for the market, whilst recognising that electricity markets change over time. Participants: Dan Roberts, Frontier Economics (Chair) Clare Dudeney, Sustainability First (Rapporteur) Charles Birchall, Fujitsu Julie Braidwood, Crown Commercial Service Nick Butlin, Tempus Energy Jill Cainey, Electricity Storage Network Hugh Conway, MEUC Steve Crake, Northumbrian Water Limited Yselkla Farmer, BEAMA Ltd Nigel Fox, National Grid Neil Gillespie, United Utilities Richard Hampshire, CGI John Hartley, Centrica Martin Hills, CEMEX UK Operations Ltd Alana Johnson, DONG Energy Chris Kimmett , Open Energi Glyn Lee, East of England Cooperative Society Ltd Andy Leeson, University of Warwick Maria Liendo, Scottish & Southern Energy Power Distribution Sejal Mahida, DECC Robin Morris, Moixa Technology Ltd John Nangle, Cabinet Office Neil O'Brien, Alkane Energy Cordi O'Hara, National Grid Chris Scott, Costain Duncan Southgate, Operational Services at Siemens Sara Vaughan, E.ON UK Clive Walker, Network Rail Janet Wood, New Power