Presentation 2 getting started

National Science Foundation Graduate
Research Fellowship Program

GETTING STARTED
$ Image by Andrew Magill

TODAY’S GOALS

- Become familiar with NSF GRFP-specific review criteria

- Become familiar with basics of grant writing

- Start thinking about what makes a great NSF GRFP proposal

WHAT YOU SHOULD
HAVE SO FAR…

1. Figured out the field your project fits into. Ask your advisor/mentor if you’re not
sure!
2. Figured out your application due date.
3. Asked THREE people for letters of recommendation. You should probably go
ahead and, on FastLane, put them down as letter writers so that they get an
email reminding them that they have to write for you!
4. Signed up for– and started filling out– your FastLane account. Remember, your
entire application is completed on FastLane!
5. Started collecting information for and drafting your proposal documents.

KEEP IN MIND:
THE APPLICATION COMPONENTS
COMPLETED NSF GRFP FASTLANE APPLICATION

TRANSCRIPTS (OFFICIAL OR UNOFFICIAL)

THREE LETTERS OF RECOMMENDATION

PERSONAL STATEMENT

PREVIOUS RESEARCH EXPERIENCE

PROPOSED PLAN OF RESEARCH

NSF WEBSITE:
“TOP TIPS FROM AWAREDEES”
- Start early, taking significant time to compose essays, and rewrite.
- Demonstrate your personal motivation and excitement for research.
- Spend time to thoroughly research your topic.
- Integrate essays to create singular theme, link the content together.
- Keep essays clear and simple to read.
- Give essays to many people for review.
- Get input from professors or university administration.
- Get input from previous applicants or winners.
- Thoroughly address both Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.
- Be sure to include all volunteer, leadership, and extracurricular activities.
- Highlight the significance of your research and how it will impact society.
- Pay close attention to language in the Program Solicitation.
- Focus on getting strong recommendation letters.
- Mention what sets you apart from a typical applicant—highlight what makes you unique!

NSF WEBSITE:
“TOP TIPS FROM REVIEWERS”
- Gain research experience, especially at the undergrad level. (GET INVOLVED WITH STUFF
NOW– IT’S NEVER TOO LATE!)
- Become involved in leadership roles and community service.
- Write clear and scientifically-sound essays.
- Strive for scientific publications and presentations.
- Have a strong academic record.
- Be sure to demonstrate the Broader Impacts criteria well.
- Select strong recommenders.
- Link your teaching/service and research experiences.
- Ensure you display a history of accomplishments.
- Thoroughly address both Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.
- Highlight any international or national experience you may have.
- Display your passion and motivation in the essays.
- Be knowledgeable of your research topic.
- Demonstrate the significance of your proposed work.
- Make sure the proposed research is realistic.

APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS
- Each application will be reviewed independently in
accordance with the NSF Merit Review Criteria using
all available information in the completed application.
- In considering applications, reviewers are instructed
to address the two Merit Review Criteria as approved
by the National Science Board - Intellectual Merit and
Broader Impacts. Therefore, applicants must address
explicitly each criterion in their written statements in
order to provide reviewers with the information
necessary to evaluate the application with respect to
both Criteria as detailed below.

WHO’S GOING TO LOOK @ THIS?
NSF Application Review Process

- Applications will be reviewed by panels of disciplinary and interdisciplinary
scientists and engineers and other professional graduate education experts.

- Applications will be assigned to panels based on the applicant's chosen field(s)
of study and the discipline(s) represented. Thus, applicants are advised to select
the field of study in the FastLane GRFP Application module that is most closely
aligned with the proposed graduate program of study and research plan.

HOW WILL I BE JUDGED?
Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact Criteria
- For each criterion, panelists evaluate and comment on the applicant’s strengths and areas for
improvement on the rating sheet, assign an "excellent,“ "very good,” "good,” "fair," or "poor.“
Then, they will determine an overall point value.
- Examples of evaluations from reviewers are available on the NSF GRFP iLearn site– check them out!

Intellectual Merit
-Panelists will consider factors including: the strength of the academic record, the proposed plan of research and
whether it is potentially transformative, the description of previous research experience, references, and the
appropriateness of the choice of institution relative to the proposed plan for graduate education and research.

Broader Impacts
- The broader impacts criterion includes contributions that infuse learning with the excitement of
discovery, and assure that the findings and methods of research are communicated in a broad context
and to a large audience.
- A strong application will encourage diversity, broaden opportunities, and enable the participation of
all citizens-women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities-in science
and research.
- In addition to reaching a broad audience, a strong application must demonstrate how it will enhance
scientific and technical understanding, while benefiting society.
- Applicants may provide characteristics of their background, including personal, professional, and
educational experiences, to indicate their potential to fulfill the broader impacts criterion.

APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS:
CRITERIA #1
What is the INTELLECTUAL MERIT of the proposed activity?
- How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and
understanding within its own field or across different fields? How well qualified is
the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the
reviewer will comment on the quality of prior work.) To what extent does the
proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially
transformative concepts? How well conceived and organized is the proposed
activity? Is there sufficient access to resources? If international activities are
proposed, are the proposed activities relevant and do they benefit the applicant?

- For example, panelists may consider the following with respect to the
Intellectual Merit Criterion: the strength of the academic record, the proposed
plan of research, the description of previous research experience or
publication/presentations, references, and the appropriateness of the choice of
institution relative to the proposed plan for graduate education and research.

APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS:
CRITERIA #2
What are the BROADER IMPACTS of the proposed activity?
- How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while
promoting teaching, training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity
broaden the participation of underrepresented groups
(e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance
the infrastructure for research and education, such as
facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be
disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding?
What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?

- For example, panelists may consider the following with respect to the Broader
Impacts Criterion: the personal, professional, and educational experiences, the
future plans and prior accomplishments in the integration of research and
education, and the potential to reach diverse audiences and benefit society.

INTELLECTUAL MERIT
Intellectual Merit… Just to Reiterate

- Panelists will consider these factors:

(1) The strength of the academic record

(2) The proposed plan of research and whether it is potentially
transformative

(3) The description of previous research experience, references, and the
appropriateness of the choice of institution relative to the proposed plan for
graduate education and research

INTELLECTUAL MERIT
Questions to Address in Your Documents
- How important is the proposed activity to advancing
knowledge and understanding within its own field or across
different fields?

- How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to
conduct the project?

- To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore
creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?

- How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity?

- Is there sufficient access to resources?

INTELLECTUAL MERIT:
“TRANSFORMATIVE RESEACH”
- The term "transformative research" is being used to
describe a range of endeavors which promise
extraordinary outcomes, such as:

(1) Revolutionizing entire disciplines

(2) Creating entirely new fields

(3) Or, disrupting accepted theories and
perspectives — in other words, those endeavors
which have the potential to change the way we
address challenges in science, engineering, and
innovation

BROADER IMPACTS
What are “broader impacts”?
- The broader impacts criterion includes contributions that infuse learning with
the excitement of discovery, and assure that the findings and methods of
research are communicated in a broad context and to a large audience.

- A strong application will encourage diversity, broaden opportunities, and enable
the participation of all citizens-women and men, underrepresented
minorities, and persons with disabilities-in science and research.

- In addition to reaching a broad audience, a strong application must demonstrate
how it will enhance scientific and technical understanding, while benefiting
society.

- Applicants may provide characteristics of their background, including
personal, professional, and educational experiences, to indicate their potential to
fulfill the broader impacts criterion.

BROADER IMPACTS
Questions to Address in Your Documents
- How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while
promoting teaching, training and learning?

- How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of
underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)?

- To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education,
such as facilities, instrumentation, networks and partnerships?

- Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological
understanding?

- What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?

BROADER IMPACTS:
ADVANCE DISCOVERY/UNDERSTANDING WHILE
PROMOTING TEACHING, TRAINING, & LEARNING
Background
- Integration of research and education is one of "three core strategies that guide [NSF] in establishing
priorities, identifying opportunities, and designing new programs and activities.... Effective integration of research
and education at all levels infuses learning with the excitement of discovery and assures that the findings and
methods of research are quickly and effectively communicated in a broader context and to a larger audience.”

Examples of Activities
- Integrate research activities into the teaching of science, math and engineering at all educational levels (e.g., K-
12, undergraduate science majors, non-science majors, and graduate students).
- Include students (e.g., K-12, undergraduate science majors, non-science majors, and /or graduate students) as
participants in the proposed activities as appropriate.
- Participate in the recruitment, training, and/or professional development of K-12 science and math teachers.
- Develop research-based educational materials or contribute to databases useful in teaching (e.g., K-16 digital
library).
- Partner with researchers and educators to develop effective means of incorporating research into learning and
education.
- Encourage student participation at meetings and activities of professional societies.
- Establish special mentoring programs for high school students, undergraduates, graduate students, and technicians
conducting research.
- Involve graduate and post-doctoral researchers in undergraduate teaching activities.
- Develop, adopt, adapt or disseminate effective models and pedagogic approaches to science, mathematics and
engineering teaching.

BROADER IMPACTS:
BROADEN PARTICIPATION OF
UNDERREPRESENTED GROUPS
Background
- One of NSF’s five-year strategies is to "broaden participation and enhance diversity in NSF programs. At
present, several groups, including underrepresented minorities, women, certain types of academic institutions, and
some geographic areas are less than full participants in the science and engineering enterprise. NSF is committed to
leading the way to an enterprise that fully captures the strength of America’s diversity.“

- Establish research and education collaborations with students and/or faculty who are members of
underrepresented groups.
- Include students from underrepresented groups as participants in the proposed research and education activities.
- Establish research and education collaborations with students and faculty from non-Ph.D.-granting institutions and
those serving underrepresented groups.
- Make campus visits and presentations at institutions that serve underrepresented groups.
- Establish research and education collaborations with faculty and students at community colleges, colleges for
women, undergraduate institutions, and “Experimental Programs to Stimulate Competitive Research” (EPSCOR)
institutions.
- Mentor early-career scientists and engineers from underrepresented groups who are submitting NSF proposals.
- Participate in developing new approaches (e.g., use of information technology and connectivity) to engage
underserved individuals, groups, and communities in science and engineering.
- Participate in conferences, workshops and field activities where diversity is a priority.

BROADER IMPACTS:
ENHANCE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR
RESEARCH EDUCATION
Background
- The NSF Act of 1950 authorizes and directs the Foundation "to foster and support the development and use of
computer and other scientific and engineering methods and technologies, primarily for research and education in
the sciences and engineering. NSF investments provide state-of-the-art tools for research and education, such as
instrumentation and equipment, multi-user facilities, ... telescopes, research vessels and aircraft, ... Internet-based
and distributed user facilities, ... research networks, digital libraries and large databases.”

- Identify and establish collaborations between disciplines and institutions, among the U.S. academic
institutions, industry and government and with international partners.
- Stimulate and support the development and dissemination of next-generation instrumentation, multi-user
facilities, and other shared research and education platforms.
- Maintain, operate and modernize shared research and education infrastructure, including facilities and science and
technology centers and engineering research centers.
- Upgrade the computation and computing infrastructure, including advanced computing resources and new types of
information tools (e.g., large databases, networks and associated systems, and digital libraries).
- Develop activities that ensure that multi-user facilities are sites of research and mentoring for large numbers of
science and engineering students.

BROADER IMPACTS:
BROAD DISSEMINATION TO ENHANCE
SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING
Background
- "NSF advocates and encourages open scientific communication. NSF expects significant findings from
supported research and educational activities to be promptly submitted for publication.... It expects PIs to
share with other researchers, at no more than incremental cost and within a reasonable time, the
data, samples, physical collections and other supporting materials created or gathered in the course of the
work. It also encourages grantees to share software and inventions . . . and otherwise to make the
innovations ... widely useful and usable." (

- Partner with museums, nature centers, science centers, and similar institutions to develop exhibits in
science, math, and engineering.
- Involve the public or industry, where possible, in research and education activities.
- Give science and engineering presentations to the broader community (e.g., at museums and libraries, on
radio shows, and in other such venues).
- Make data available in a timely manner by means of databases, digital libraries, or other venues such as CD-
ROMs.
- Publish in diverse media (e.g., non-technical literature, and websites, CD-ROMs, press kits) to reach broad
audiences.
- Present research and education results in formats useful to policy-makers, members of
Congress, industry, and broad audiences.
- Participate in multi- and interdisciplinary conferences, workshops, and research activities.
- Integrate research with education activities in order to communicate in a broader context.

BROADER IMPACTS:
BENEFITS TO SOCIETY
Background
- NSF is committed to fostering connections between discoveries and their use in service to
society. The knowledge provided by NSF-funded projects offers a rich foundation for its
broad and useful application. For example, projects may contribute to understanding the
environment, commercial technology, public policy, health or safety and other aspects of
the public welfare.”

- Demonstrate the linkage between discovery and societal benefit by providing specific
examples and explanations regarding the potential application of research and education
results.
- Partner with academic scientists, staff at federal agencies and with the private sector on
both technological and scientific projects to integrate research into broader programs and
activities of national interest.
- Analyze, interpret, and synthesize research and education results in formats
understandable and useful for non-scientists.
- Provide information for policy formulation by Federal, State or local agencies.

PERSONAL STATEMENT
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS TO ADDRESS IN THIS ESSAY:
- Why are you fascinated by your research area?
- What examples of leadership skills and unique characteristics do you bring to your chosen
field?
- What personal and individual strengths do you have that make you a qualified applicant?
- How will receiving the fellowship contribute to your career goals?
- How does the information in your Personal Statement address the Intellectual Merit and
Broader Impacts criteria?

WHAT THIS ESSAY SHOULD DO:
- Introduce you as a person (remember: put a face to a name, but don’t air all your dirty
sheets). The more you can relate your personal experience (esp. in terms of addressing
diversity/adversity) to your research project, the better.
- Work as your professional bio.
- Speak to your qualifications (awards, experiences, etc.)
- Work as a crystal ball (What are your future goals? How will this money help you?)
- Introduce why your work MATTERS and its BROADER IMPACT

PERSONAL STATEMENT
UCR Tips for Personal Statement

- Discuss your previous academic record.

- Discuss why you chose to pursue your graduate studies at UCR.

- To help panelists evaluate the broader impacts criterion, describe your
background, including personal, professional, and educational experiences, to indicate
your potential to fulfill the broader impacts criterion.

(1) Are you the first in your family to go to college? To go to graduate school?
(2) Are you from an ethnic group that is traditionally underrepresented in science
and engineering fields? (In engineering, women are also considered an
underrepresented.)
(3) Have you had to overcome any disadvantages (e.g., economic, medical, family) to
get to where you are today?

PREVIOUS RESEARCH
- What are all of your applicable experiences?
- For each experience, what were the key questions, methodology, findings, and conclusions?
- Did you work in a team and/or independently?
- How did you assist in the analysis of results?
- How did your activities address the Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts criteria?

- Describe your scientific research activities and research experiences (undergrad, graduate, work-
related). Be sure to distinguish between your undergrad and graduate experiences.
- Explain the purpose of the research and your specific role in the research, including the extent to
which you worked independently and/or as part of a team, and what you learned from your research
experience.
- List any publications and/or presentations made at national and/or regional professional meetings.
- Foreground how your previous research has led up to your current work. How does your previous
research experience inform your proposed project/current work that’s related to your project?
- Foreground how your previous research experience ties into Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts
criteria.

PREVIOUS RESEARCH
UCR Tips for Personal Statement

- It would be a good idea to discuss training in ethics, such as Responsible Conduct of
Research. This is mandatory as of January 2010 for all trainees supported by NSF grants
anyway, so you can show NSF that you understand this and are prepared for it. BCOE and
CNAS are working on programs that satisfy the new ethics requirements. For
information, please see UCR’s Responsible Conduct of Research
site, http://or.ucr.edu/RI/ResponsibleConduct.aspx. If your research involves human or
animal subjects, you should also become familiar with those aspects of research ethics (see
http://or.ucr.edu/RI/index.aspx) .

- UCR doctoral students participate in the Teaching Assistant Development Program
(TADP, see http://www.tadp.ucr.edu/). This is relevant to your NSF proposal because it
makes you a better communicator and mentor. After you have your Ph.D., you will be
better-prepared to contribute to your organization as an educator and mentor (for
academic career paths) or as a team leader (in industry), and your communication skills
will help you communicate the importance of science and engineering to the public. (If you
really have space to kill, read and cite the book Unscientific America: How Scientific
Illiteracy Threatens our Future by Chris Mooney, about the nation’s overall lack of scientific
literacy.)

PROPOSED PLAN OF RESEARCH
- What issues in the scientific community are you most passionate about?
- Do you possess the technical knowledge and skills necessary for conducting this work, or will you
have sufficient mentoring and training to complete the study?
- Is this plan feasible for the allotted time and institutional resources?
- How will your research contribute to the "big picture" outside the academic context?
- How can you draft a plan using the guidelines presented in the essay instructions?
- How does your proposed research address the Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts criteria?

- Present a complete plan for your research project. Remember, though, you only have TWO pages in
which to accomplish discussing your plan. So, choose aspects of your plan that make your project
clear, seem feasible, and that lead to a discussion of your project’s Intellectual Merit and Broader
Impacts!
- Address how you became interested in your topic– in the context of your research plan, of course!
- Demonstrate your understanding of research design and methodology. Check with your
advisor/mentor to make sure you demonstrate these things fully and clearly!
- Draw connections to your previous research, if possible.
- Foreground both your research’s and plan for your project’s Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.
- Keep in Mind: Plan should be informative to other persons working in the same or related fields
and, insofar as possible, understandable to a scientifically or technically literate lay reader.

PROPOSED PLAN OF RESEARCH:
KEEP IN MIND!
According to NSF, full proposal plan should present…

(1) Objectives and scientific, engineering, or educational
significance of the proposed work

(2) Suitability of the methods to be employed

(3) Qualifications of the investigator and the grantee organization

(4) Effect of the activity on the infrastructure of science, engineering
and education

(5) Should present the merits of the proposed project clearly and
should be prepared with the care and thoroughness of a paper
submitted for publication

PROPOSED PLAN OF RESEARCH:
WORTH REPEATING!
SPECIAL NOTES FOR RESEARCH PROPOSAL
- IN PROPOSAL: Include the title, key
words, hypothesis, research plan (strategy, methodology, and
controls), anticipated results or findings, and literature
citations. If you have not formulated a research plan, your
statement should include a description of a topic that interests
you and how you propose to conduct research on that topic.

- ON FASTLANE SITE: In addition to submitting your proposal
document, on the FastLane site, you also have to type out in a
field key words to describe the proposed research. These key
words must be 50 CHARACTERS OR LESS!

GRANT WRITING: THE BASICS:
GETTING ORGANIZED TO WRITE
Outline / Listing
Create a detailed outline of the essays or a list of “selling points” you need to
cover in each of the documents, including space allocations. Map the sections of
the proposal to the scoring criteria.

Storyboard
A mock-up of the proposal showing the points each section will make, the space
allocated to each section’s text and graphics, etc. You could use a poster board or
large piece of construction paper to create a storyboard. You could also use a
chalk- or white-board.

“Check-Off” List
Create a “check-off” list of different selling points you need to cover in each of
the essays. Lists like this can be particularly useful for your first draft.

Note Cards / Sticky Notes
Use note cards or sticky notes to write down different components of each essay
and ideas for addressing these components. You can then play around with the
arrangement of the notes.

GRANT WRITING:
THE BASICS

- Understand your audience

- Understand your constraints

- Formulate your message—and stick to it!

- Use words and graphics effectively to sell both
yourself and your project

- Be consistent and professional

GRANT WRITING:
THE BASICS
The Audience
- What does the sponsor/customer want? What is important to the people making the funding
decision? Why?

- What you want to sell is not necessarily what the customer wants to buy. Therefore, be sure you are
selling what the buyer is buying and “in the market for.” Write about what interests the
sponsor/customer, which may or may not be what interests you. Compromise– it will pay off!

- What will your competitors propose? How do you show that your approach is better (without
insulting the competition or the peer reviewer)?

- Reviewers have 1,000,001 reasons to reject your proposal– how can you change their minds?

- You’re speaking to folks in your field—or, related field– but this doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t use
your proposal as an opportunity to TEACH them about your project and why it’s special.
And, definitely no reason to use extremely, extremely specialized language and terms!

- Don’t insult the reviewers! Keep in mind, you don’t want to make it sound like everyone’s work will
be obsolete or that it’s irrelevant– or, even worse, “dumb” or ill-conceived!

GRANT WRITING:
THE BASICS
Audience: What Makes You Special?
- Make a list of the things that are special about your idea,
approach, and general project. These are things important to the
person making the funding decision – not necessarily the things
important to you. Keep in mind that you are selling your project
and that NSF folks are looking to see if your work fits into the
Broader Impact and Intellectual Merit criteria.

- Proposals must highlight what makes us special. Answer the
following in your proposal:
(1) Why should the sponsor do what I propose?
(2) Why do it now?
(3) Why am I the best choice to do it?

GRANT WRITING:
THE BASICS
Dr. Tom Sant’s NOSE Paradigm

Need: Do you understand what the customer/sponsor really wants?
This may or may not be in the solicitation.

Outcomes: Can you convince the reviewers that you can deliver
desired outcomes?

Solution: Can you define an approach that will give the customer
confidence in selecting you?

Evidence: Can you substantiate the things you say? How will you
back up your hypothesis? Your approach?

BE CONFIDENT… EVEN IF YOU AREN’T
“Project” VS. “Proposal”
- Remember, your proposal is doing the work of communicating
why you’re a great applicant… your project is what’s being sold!
Don’t treat your proposal like an article. Avoid saying things like
this: “In the proposal, I will argue…” or “…I will show…”

- Treat your proposal as a “commercial” for your project and you
as a researcher.

Confidence
- Don’t downplay your project– this only plants the seeds for
rejection! Example: “This project, if funded, would demonstrate
cold fusion for the first time” VS. “This project will demonstrate
cold fusion for the first time by pursuing a newly developed
approach…”

SENTENCE LEVEL
- Be upfront: The most important sentence is the first sentence. Don’t waste it
with a statement of fact or background information. A better approach: Start with
why you or your work are special, unique, different.

- More about being upfront: The first paragraph of your research proposal essay
should say what you propose to do, why it’s exactly what the sponsor is looking
for, and why your idea is going to work. If that’s buried at the bottom of page
2, after a lengthy introduction, your chances are slim. Be straightforward!

- Short words in short sentences. Use mostly words of three syllables or less.
Remember: NSF folks have to read quickly, so you need to get your point across
quickly and easily.

- Aim for TWENTY words per sentence. Try not to go over THIRTY words at the
very, VERY max. Short and to-the-point wins attention spans and $$$.

- Write in the active voice. (“It will be demonstrated that…” VS. “This project
demonstrates…”)

SENTENCE LEVEL
- Be consistent. Consistency makes your project coherent and easy to
read!

- As you draft your essays, you may find it helpful to create your own
“stylebook,” a list of how you’re going to cite, write out names and
numbers, or the kinds of abbreviations, etc. that you will use. Or, perhaps
stick with a stylebook that’s already out there (Chicago, for example).

- Consistency example: All of these terms mean the same thing. All of
them are, technically, correct. Choose one style, though, then stick with it
throughout your application.
15 degrees C
15 deg. C
15C
15 °C
15° C
15°C

RECOMMENDED
READING
- Tom Sant’s The Language of Success

- Stylebook that is relevant to your field.
Remember, consistency is key.

- Sample NSF GRFP essays online. We’ll go over a
few next time. However, the more you read, the
more you’ll be familiar with what a successful
proposal actually looks like!

Q&A
- What kinds of questions do you have?

- What kinds of concerns do you have?

- What would you like to know more about?

- What would you find helpful?

NEXT WORKSHOP…
NEXT WORKSHOP DATE & TIME
Thursday, 13 October, 11-1pm

PLACE
Right here!

THEME & TOPICS
Theme: Writing Workshop

Important: Bring in drafts of your documents! They can be
really, rough and that’s okay. Even bring in outlines! Remember, the
more eyeballs that look at your proposal at different stages of the
drafting and writing process, the better.

Sample Topics and Activities: Share mini-drafts of essay
documents, NSF GRFP formatting review, NSF Grant Proposal Guide
“Special Guidelines,” Look Through ESSAY EXAMPLES Together

Presentation 2 getting started

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (13)

Similar to Presentation 2 getting started (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Presentation 2 getting started