SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Determination of Antibiogram of Pathogenic
Bacteria Isolated from Clinical Samples
Presented by
Most. Salma Khatun
ID NO: MMB 06605411
Department of Microbiology
Stamford University Bangladesh
 Urinary tract infection (UTI), blood stream infections (BSIs),
wound infection, diarrheal diseases and enteric infections are
common bacterial infections in human.
 Approximately 150 million UTIs cases are reported every year
throughout the world
 Women are at greater risk of developing UTI than men.
 UTIs are caused commonly by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Proteus mirabilis, etc. and enterococci (especially Enterococcus
faecalis).
 BSIs are one of the most common nosocomial infections which
cause morbidity and mortality world wide.
 Both Gram positive and Gram negative microorganisms as well
as fungi are responsible for BSI.
Introduction
Introduction
 Wound-infections are considered as crucial health problem
caused by the invasion of pathogenic microbes.
 S. aureus, S. epidermidis, MRSA, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P.
aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus
spp., Enterobacter spp., and Acinetobacter spp. were reported
to be associated with wound-infections.
 Diarrheal diseases and enteric infections are the major causes
of morbidity and mortality in developing world.
 On the global scale, diarrheal diseases are the leading cause of
childhood death.
Introduction
 Escherichia coli is the most common cause of UTIs in humans and
is a leading cause of enteric infections and systemic infections.
 Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative,
rod-shaped and multi drug resistant pathogen.
 It is found in soil, water, skin flora, and different man made
environments.
 P. aeruginosa causes infection in the urinary tract, respiratory
system, dermis, soft tissue, bacteraemia, bone and joint,
gastrointestine and blood, particularly in patients with severe
burns, tuberculosis, cancer and AIDS.
 P. aeruginosa is its low antibiotic susceptibility.
Introduction
 Klebsiella is known to produce bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract
infection, wound infections, blood infections and infections in the
intensive care unit
 Salmonella Typhi is a gram-negative enteric bacillus responsible for
typhoid fever and has been a burden on developing nations for
generations
 Staphylococcus aureus causes a variety of community and hospital-
associated infections, such as bacteremia, sepsis, endocarditis,
pneumonia, osteomyelitis, arthritis and skin diseases
 Antibiotics are low- to mediummolecular-weight compounds that kill or
inhibit the growth of bacteria and can be ingested by or injected into
humans and animals with minimal side effects.
 Antibiotic resistance may arise due to several reasons such as,
restricted access of the antibiotic to its target, active efflux of antibiotic,
modification of the antibiotic target and failure to activate the antibiotic
OBJECTIVES
The objectives of this study were
Isolation of pathogenic bacteria from urine,
blood, stool, swab, sputum and pus.
Biochemical identification of the isolated
bacteria.
To determine the antibiotic sensitivity patterns
of the isolated pathogens.
Methodology
Collection of sample
Isolation of pathogenic bacteria
Identification of isolated bacteria using
standard biochemical tests
Antibiotic sensitivity by disc diffusion method
Methodology
Antibiotic sensitivity test including the following antibiotics
• Ampicillin (10 g)
• Ceftiaxone (30 g)
• Ciprofloxacin (5 g)
• Co-Trimoxazole (25 g)
• Ceftazidime (30 g)
• Gentamycin (10 g)
• Mecillinum (10 g)
• Imipenum (10 g)
• Aztreonam (30 g)
• Ofloxacin (5 g)
• Pefloxacin (5 g)
Results
Females
71.67%
Males
28.33%
Fig. 1.a. Distribution of patient with
positive culture of urine.
Females
79.55%
Males
20.45%
Fig. 1.b. Prevalence of E. coli of urine according
to sex.
Results
Name of isolates Number of organisms
isolated
Percentage
%
Gram negative
organisms
E. coli 44 73.33
Klebsiella spp. 10 16.67
Pseudomonas spp. 04 6.67
Gram positive
organism
Enterococcus spp. 03 3.33
Table 3.1. Distribution of positive isolates identified from the
urine samples.
Results
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%
of
sensitive
Antibiotic
E. coli from urine
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig. 2. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli from urine against several different antibiotics
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%
of
sensitive
Antibiotic
Klebsiella
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig. 3. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella spp. from urine against several different
antibiotics
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Gentamycin Imipenum Aztreonam Ofloxacin Pefloxacin
%
of
sensitivity
Antibiotic
Pseudomonas
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig. 4. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas from urine against several different
antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%
of
Sensitivity
Antibiotic
Enterococci
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig. 5. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Enterococci from urine against several different antibiotics
86%
88%
90%
92%
94%
96%
98%
100%
Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Ceftazidime Gentamycin
Ofloxacin Pefloxacin
%
of
Sensitivity
Antibiotic
Salmonella typhi
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig.6. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Salmonella typhi of blood against several different
antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%Of
Sensitivity
Antibiotic
E. coli
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig 7. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli of stool against several different antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%
of
sensitivity
Antibiotic
E. coli
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig.8. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli of swab against several different antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin
%
of
sensitivity
Antiiotic
S. aureus
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig. 9. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of S. aureus of swab against several different
antibiotics.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin
%
of
sensitivity
Antibiotic
Beta haemolytic streptococci
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig. 10. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of beta haemolytic streptococci of swab against several
different antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%
of
sensitivity
Antibiotic
E.coli Resistance
Sensitve
Fig.11. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli isolated for Pus against several different
antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin
%
of
Sensitivity
Antibiotic
Staphylococcus
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig.12. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Staphylococcus of Pus against several different
antibiotics.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Gentamycin Imipenum Aztreonam Ofloxacin Pefloxacin
%
of
sensitivity
Antibiotic
Pseudomonas
Resistance
Sensitive
Fig.13. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas of pus against several different
antibiotics.
Gram Negative Bacteria Gram positive Bacteria
Sample E. coli Klebsiella Psedomonous S. typhi S. aureus BHS Enterococci
Urine 44 10 4 0 0 0 2
Blood 0 0 0 12 0 0 0
Swab 4 0 2 0 8 6 0
Stool 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sputum 0 2 2 0 0 1 0
Pus 9 0 6 0 3 0 2
Total
62 (51%)
12
(9.84%) 14 (11.47%) 12(9.84%) 11(9%) 7(5.74%) 4(3.28%)
100(81.97%) 22(18.03%)
Table 2. Distribution of Gram positive and Gram negative isolates identified from different
samples.
N.B: BHS = Beta haemolytic streptococci; S. aureus = Staphylococcus aureus ;
P. spp= Pseudomonas spp.; N/D= Not done; S. typhi= Salmonella typhi
Antibiotic Sensitivi
ty
E.coli N(%) Klebsiella N
(%)
P. spp. N(%) S. typhi N(%) S. aureus N
(%)
BHS N(%) Entero. N
(%)
Ampicillin S 0 0 N/D 11(91.67) 1(9.10) 7(100) 4(100)
R 62(100) 12(100) N/D 1(8.33) 10(90.90) 0 0
Ceftiaxone S 37(59.68) 7(58.34) 6(46.16) 12(100) 11(100) 7(100) 3(75)
R 25(40.32) 5(41.66) 7(53.84) 0 0 0 1(25)
Ciprofloxacin S 32(51.62) 9(75) 5(38.46) 12(100) 6(54.55) 2(28.57) 2(50)
R 30(48.38) 3(25) 8(62.54) 0 5(45.45) 5(71.43) 2(50)
Co Trimoxazole S 29(46.78) 7(58.34) N/D 11(91.67) 11(100) 0 1(25)
R 33(53.22) 5(41.66) N/D 1(8.33) 0 7(100) 3(75)
Ceftazidime S 30(52.63) 8(66.67) 7(53.84) 12(100) N/D N/D 3(75)
R 27(47.37) 4(33.33) 6(46.16) 0 N/D N/D 1(25)
Gentamycin S 46(74.20) 11(91.67) 7(53.84) 12(100) 11(100) 3(42.86) 2(50)
R 16(25.80) 1(8.33) 6(46.16) 0 0 4(57.14) 2(50)
Mecillinum S 44(90) 8(66.67) N/D N/D N/D N/D 1(50)
R 5(10) 4(33.33) N/D N/D N/D N/D 1(50)
Imipenum S 54(94.74) 12(100) 10(76.93) N/D N/D N/D 4(100)
R 3(5.26) 0 3(23.07) N/D N/D N/D 0
Aztreonam S 31(54.39) 4(33.33) 7(53.84) N/D N/D N/D 0
R 26(45.61) 8(66.67) 6(46.16) N/D N/D N/D 4(100)
Ofloxacin S 30(48.38) 9(75) 5(38.46) 12(100) 6(54.55) 1(14.28) 2(50)
R 32(51.62) 3(25) 8(62.54) 0 5(45.45) 6(85.72) 2(50)
Pefloxacin S 30(48.38) 9(75) 4(30.77) 11(91.67) 6(54.55) 1(14.28) 2(50)
R 32(51.62) 3(25) 9(69.23) 1(8.33) 5(45.45) 6(85.72) 2(50)
Table 4. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of all isolates.
N.B: BHS = Beta haemolytic streptococci; S. aureus = Staphylococcus aureus; P. spp= Pseudomonas
spp.; N/D= Not done; Entero.= Enterococci; S. typhi= Salmonella typhi
Conclusion
 This study finds that, the prevalence Gram negative bacteria in
different clinical infections was higher than Gram positive bacteria.
 Most common bacteria from UTI were E. coli (73.33%) followed
by Klebsiella (16.67%) and Pseudomonas (6.67%).
 Female patients had higher prevalence UTI than in males.
 The most effective antibiotic against Gram negative bacteria was
Imipenem.
 The most effective antibiotics against Gram positive bacteria were
Ceftiaxone and Gentamycin.
 The appropriate use of antimicrobial drugs, and continuous
monitoring and studies on the multidrug resistant bacteria isolates
help maintain effectiveness of antibiotics and control spread of
antibiotic resistant bacteria.
Thanks to All

More Related Content

PDF
Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Isolates Causing Urinary ...
PPT
PDF
Tamizhazhagan.1
PPTX
PPTX
MICROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SAMPLES COMING TO PMCH.pptx
PDF
Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns of burn wound i...
PPTX
Dr d p rajani
PDF
Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Pus Isolates in Ben...
Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Bacterial Isolates Causing Urinary ...
Tamizhazhagan.1
MICROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF SAMPLES COMING TO PMCH.pptx
Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns of burn wound i...
Dr d p rajani
Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Pus Isolates in Ben...

Similar to Presentation.pptx (20)

PPT
Klebsiella+proteus+uti
PDF
EVALUATION OF FOSFOMYCIN
PDF
IBacterial Pathogens Causing Urinary Tract Infections and Their Antimicrobial...
PPT
5_TK3_P3T4-Training_Slides_for_Prescribing_Clinicians_Phase_3.ppt
PDF
D03406028031
PPT
Prescribing information for Doctors for Antibiotics
PPTX
Dessertation - Early treatment of Bloodstream Infections
PDF
Antibiogram of Bacterial Isolates at Hail General Hospital, KSA June 1 – Dece...
PPT
Klebsiella+Proteus+Uti
PPT
PPTX
Antibiogram
PPSX
Piperacillin & Tazobactam
PDF
Etiology and Antimicrobial Sensitivity Profile of the Microorganism Associate...
PDF
The prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) among Escherichia...
PPTX
Multi drug resistant organisims
PDF
Antimicrobial activity of Antibiotics and Antiseptics (Dettol and Betadine) a...
PPTX
Laboratory procedures & micro organisms susceptibility and resistance pat...
PPT
PDF
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Escherichia Coli Isolates from Urine ...
Klebsiella+proteus+uti
EVALUATION OF FOSFOMYCIN
IBacterial Pathogens Causing Urinary Tract Infections and Their Antimicrobial...
5_TK3_P3T4-Training_Slides_for_Prescribing_Clinicians_Phase_3.ppt
D03406028031
Prescribing information for Doctors for Antibiotics
Dessertation - Early treatment of Bloodstream Infections
Antibiogram of Bacterial Isolates at Hail General Hospital, KSA June 1 – Dece...
Klebsiella+Proteus+Uti
Antibiogram
Piperacillin & Tazobactam
Etiology and Antimicrobial Sensitivity Profile of the Microorganism Associate...
The prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) among Escherichia...
Multi drug resistant organisims
Antimicrobial activity of Antibiotics and Antiseptics (Dettol and Betadine) a...
Laboratory procedures & micro organisms susceptibility and resistance pat...
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile of Escherichia Coli Isolates from Urine ...
Ad

More from MosharafHossain72 (12)

PPTX
Presentation file. Final.pptx
PDF
Part-3.pdf
PDF
Part-1.pdf
PDF
As-Yet-Still-Forgiven Past- Dylan Thomas and Nostalgia (1).pdf
PDF
Blue economy.pdf
PDF
DESIGN AND CONFIGURATION OF VLAN FOR CORPORATE OFFICE USING EIGRP PROTOCOL.pdf
PDF
full term paper.pdf
PDF
Full Report.pdf
PDF
Full Rerm Paper.pdf
PPT
Presentation file. Final.pptx
Part-3.pdf
Part-1.pdf
As-Yet-Still-Forgiven Past- Dylan Thomas and Nostalgia (1).pdf
Blue economy.pdf
DESIGN AND CONFIGURATION OF VLAN FOR CORPORATE OFFICE USING EIGRP PROTOCOL.pdf
full term paper.pdf
Full Report.pdf
Full Rerm Paper.pdf
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
Introduction to Building Materials
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
Introduction to Building Materials
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
1_English_Language_Set_2.pdf probationary
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx

Presentation.pptx

  • 1. Determination of Antibiogram of Pathogenic Bacteria Isolated from Clinical Samples Presented by Most. Salma Khatun ID NO: MMB 06605411 Department of Microbiology Stamford University Bangladesh
  • 2.  Urinary tract infection (UTI), blood stream infections (BSIs), wound infection, diarrheal diseases and enteric infections are common bacterial infections in human.  Approximately 150 million UTIs cases are reported every year throughout the world  Women are at greater risk of developing UTI than men.  UTIs are caused commonly by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, etc. and enterococci (especially Enterococcus faecalis).  BSIs are one of the most common nosocomial infections which cause morbidity and mortality world wide.  Both Gram positive and Gram negative microorganisms as well as fungi are responsible for BSI. Introduction
  • 3. Introduction  Wound-infections are considered as crucial health problem caused by the invasion of pathogenic microbes.  S. aureus, S. epidermidis, MRSA, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, Proteus vulgaris, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus spp., Enterobacter spp., and Acinetobacter spp. were reported to be associated with wound-infections.  Diarrheal diseases and enteric infections are the major causes of morbidity and mortality in developing world.  On the global scale, diarrheal diseases are the leading cause of childhood death.
  • 4. Introduction  Escherichia coli is the most common cause of UTIs in humans and is a leading cause of enteric infections and systemic infections.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, rod-shaped and multi drug resistant pathogen.  It is found in soil, water, skin flora, and different man made environments.  P. aeruginosa causes infection in the urinary tract, respiratory system, dermis, soft tissue, bacteraemia, bone and joint, gastrointestine and blood, particularly in patients with severe burns, tuberculosis, cancer and AIDS.  P. aeruginosa is its low antibiotic susceptibility.
  • 5. Introduction  Klebsiella is known to produce bacterial pneumonia, urinary tract infection, wound infections, blood infections and infections in the intensive care unit  Salmonella Typhi is a gram-negative enteric bacillus responsible for typhoid fever and has been a burden on developing nations for generations  Staphylococcus aureus causes a variety of community and hospital- associated infections, such as bacteremia, sepsis, endocarditis, pneumonia, osteomyelitis, arthritis and skin diseases  Antibiotics are low- to mediummolecular-weight compounds that kill or inhibit the growth of bacteria and can be ingested by or injected into humans and animals with minimal side effects.  Antibiotic resistance may arise due to several reasons such as, restricted access of the antibiotic to its target, active efflux of antibiotic, modification of the antibiotic target and failure to activate the antibiotic
  • 6. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were Isolation of pathogenic bacteria from urine, blood, stool, swab, sputum and pus. Biochemical identification of the isolated bacteria. To determine the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of the isolated pathogens.
  • 7. Methodology Collection of sample Isolation of pathogenic bacteria Identification of isolated bacteria using standard biochemical tests Antibiotic sensitivity by disc diffusion method
  • 8. Methodology Antibiotic sensitivity test including the following antibiotics • Ampicillin (10 g) • Ceftiaxone (30 g) • Ciprofloxacin (5 g) • Co-Trimoxazole (25 g) • Ceftazidime (30 g) • Gentamycin (10 g) • Mecillinum (10 g) • Imipenum (10 g) • Aztreonam (30 g) • Ofloxacin (5 g) • Pefloxacin (5 g)
  • 9. Results Females 71.67% Males 28.33% Fig. 1.a. Distribution of patient with positive culture of urine. Females 79.55% Males 20.45% Fig. 1.b. Prevalence of E. coli of urine according to sex.
  • 10. Results Name of isolates Number of organisms isolated Percentage % Gram negative organisms E. coli 44 73.33 Klebsiella spp. 10 16.67 Pseudomonas spp. 04 6.67 Gram positive organism Enterococcus spp. 03 3.33 Table 3.1. Distribution of positive isolates identified from the urine samples.
  • 11. Results 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of sensitive Antibiotic E. coli from urine Resistance Sensitive Fig. 2. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli from urine against several different antibiotics 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of sensitive Antibiotic Klebsiella Resistance Sensitive Fig. 3. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella spp. from urine against several different antibiotics
  • 12. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Gentamycin Imipenum Aztreonam Ofloxacin Pefloxacin % of sensitivity Antibiotic Pseudomonas Resistance Sensitive Fig. 4. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas from urine against several different antibiotics. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of Sensitivity Antibiotic Enterococci Resistance Sensitive Fig. 5. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Enterococci from urine against several different antibiotics
  • 13. 86% 88% 90% 92% 94% 96% 98% 100% Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Ceftazidime Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin % of Sensitivity Antibiotic Salmonella typhi Resistance Sensitive Fig.6. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Salmonella typhi of blood against several different antibiotics. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% %Of Sensitivity Antibiotic E. coli Resistance Sensitive Fig 7. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli of stool against several different antibiotics.
  • 14. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of sensitivity Antibiotic E. coli Resistance Sensitive Fig.8. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli of swab against several different antibiotics. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin % of sensitivity Antiiotic S. aureus Resistance Sensitive Fig. 9. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of S. aureus of swab against several different antibiotics.
  • 15. 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin % of sensitivity Antibiotic Beta haemolytic streptococci Resistance Sensitive Fig. 10. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of beta haemolytic streptococci of swab against several different antibiotics. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of sensitivity Antibiotic E.coli Resistance Sensitve Fig.11. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of E. coli isolated for Pus against several different antibiotics.
  • 16. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ampicillin Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Co_Trimoxazole Gentamycin Ofloxacin Pefloxacin % of Sensitivity Antibiotic Staphylococcus Resistance Sensitive Fig.12. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Staphylococcus of Pus against several different antibiotics. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ceftiaxone Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime Gentamycin Imipenum Aztreonam Ofloxacin Pefloxacin % of sensitivity Antibiotic Pseudomonas Resistance Sensitive Fig.13. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas of pus against several different antibiotics.
  • 17. Gram Negative Bacteria Gram positive Bacteria Sample E. coli Klebsiella Psedomonous S. typhi S. aureus BHS Enterococci Urine 44 10 4 0 0 0 2 Blood 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 Swab 4 0 2 0 8 6 0 Stool 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sputum 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 Pus 9 0 6 0 3 0 2 Total 62 (51%) 12 (9.84%) 14 (11.47%) 12(9.84%) 11(9%) 7(5.74%) 4(3.28%) 100(81.97%) 22(18.03%) Table 2. Distribution of Gram positive and Gram negative isolates identified from different samples. N.B: BHS = Beta haemolytic streptococci; S. aureus = Staphylococcus aureus ; P. spp= Pseudomonas spp.; N/D= Not done; S. typhi= Salmonella typhi
  • 18. Antibiotic Sensitivi ty E.coli N(%) Klebsiella N (%) P. spp. N(%) S. typhi N(%) S. aureus N (%) BHS N(%) Entero. N (%) Ampicillin S 0 0 N/D 11(91.67) 1(9.10) 7(100) 4(100) R 62(100) 12(100) N/D 1(8.33) 10(90.90) 0 0 Ceftiaxone S 37(59.68) 7(58.34) 6(46.16) 12(100) 11(100) 7(100) 3(75) R 25(40.32) 5(41.66) 7(53.84) 0 0 0 1(25) Ciprofloxacin S 32(51.62) 9(75) 5(38.46) 12(100) 6(54.55) 2(28.57) 2(50) R 30(48.38) 3(25) 8(62.54) 0 5(45.45) 5(71.43) 2(50) Co Trimoxazole S 29(46.78) 7(58.34) N/D 11(91.67) 11(100) 0 1(25) R 33(53.22) 5(41.66) N/D 1(8.33) 0 7(100) 3(75) Ceftazidime S 30(52.63) 8(66.67) 7(53.84) 12(100) N/D N/D 3(75) R 27(47.37) 4(33.33) 6(46.16) 0 N/D N/D 1(25) Gentamycin S 46(74.20) 11(91.67) 7(53.84) 12(100) 11(100) 3(42.86) 2(50) R 16(25.80) 1(8.33) 6(46.16) 0 0 4(57.14) 2(50) Mecillinum S 44(90) 8(66.67) N/D N/D N/D N/D 1(50) R 5(10) 4(33.33) N/D N/D N/D N/D 1(50) Imipenum S 54(94.74) 12(100) 10(76.93) N/D N/D N/D 4(100) R 3(5.26) 0 3(23.07) N/D N/D N/D 0 Aztreonam S 31(54.39) 4(33.33) 7(53.84) N/D N/D N/D 0 R 26(45.61) 8(66.67) 6(46.16) N/D N/D N/D 4(100) Ofloxacin S 30(48.38) 9(75) 5(38.46) 12(100) 6(54.55) 1(14.28) 2(50) R 32(51.62) 3(25) 8(62.54) 0 5(45.45) 6(85.72) 2(50) Pefloxacin S 30(48.38) 9(75) 4(30.77) 11(91.67) 6(54.55) 1(14.28) 2(50) R 32(51.62) 3(25) 9(69.23) 1(8.33) 5(45.45) 6(85.72) 2(50) Table 4. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of all isolates. N.B: BHS = Beta haemolytic streptococci; S. aureus = Staphylococcus aureus; P. spp= Pseudomonas spp.; N/D= Not done; Entero.= Enterococci; S. typhi= Salmonella typhi
  • 19. Conclusion  This study finds that, the prevalence Gram negative bacteria in different clinical infections was higher than Gram positive bacteria.  Most common bacteria from UTI were E. coli (73.33%) followed by Klebsiella (16.67%) and Pseudomonas (6.67%).  Female patients had higher prevalence UTI than in males.  The most effective antibiotic against Gram negative bacteria was Imipenem.  The most effective antibiotics against Gram positive bacteria were Ceftiaxone and Gentamycin.  The appropriate use of antimicrobial drugs, and continuous monitoring and studies on the multidrug resistant bacteria isolates help maintain effectiveness of antibiotics and control spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria.