Programmatic Audience Development - July 2014

Going Global:
Programmatic Audience Development
Around the World
A WINTERBERRY GROUP WHITE PAPER JULY 2014
WITH THE
SUPPORT OF
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH

© 2014 Winterberry Group LLC. 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This white paper would not have been possible without the significant contributions of more
than 200 executive-level thought leaders—including contributors, international trade association
supporters and reviewers representing all segments of the advertising, marketing, media and
technology industries across 12 global markets—Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France,
Germany, the Persian Gulf region, Japan, Mexico, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the
United States. In particular, Winterberry Group is grateful to our research partner, the Interactive
Advertising Bureau, as well as the above sponsors for their generous support of this
research initiative.
Additionally, we extend our deepest appreciation to the marketers, publishers, technology
developers and service providers who contributed their time, insights and enthusiasm in support
of our research. Though their individual names are not mentioned in this paper, they represent
some of the most respected and innovative companies in the data-driven marketing and media
world—including AdAudience, AJ Advisers, Aunica, Brandwatch Germany, Clicks2Customers.
com, Dell, Inc., Dentsu Aegis Network, Kaspersky Lab, makazi, News Corp Australia, nugg.ad
AG, ROIx Brazil, SAP, Simbiose Ventures Brazil, and many others.
Lastly, we would like to thank the IAB licensee organizations around the world—including IAB
Australia, IAB Brasil, IAB Canada, IAB France, BVDW (Germany), IAB Mexico and IAB South
Africa—who enthusiastically lent their support to our research effort and introduced us to dozens
of thought leaders within their respective markets.
Premier Sponsors
Supporting Sponsors

Humor sometimes has a hard time cutting through language and cultural barriers. But it’s
no joke how the proliferation of data and technology is reshaping the media business.
Publishers are looking to build audiences defined by specific interests and behaviors.
Marketers are aiming to engage with consumers across devices, points of sale and
geographies. And technology developers, agencies and other service providers? They’re
racing to make all of it happen.
They’ve been spurred on by a pair of recent developments that together represent the most
profound paradigm shift to affect the practice of publishing since the dawn of the Internet.
The first is the embrace of the consumer audience—as defined by a wide range of expressed,
observed and inferred data points—as the strategic pillar upon which the transaction of media
can and ought to be based. The second—the meteoric growth of programmatic marketing—
follows in natural order, representing the tactical means by which practitioners bring the
promise of audience development to life.
But while the media community in the United States, the United Kingdom and certain other
markets has been awash in programmatic fever for more than five years, the shift to an
“audience culture” has been slower to take hold elsewhere. Rapidly, though, that’s changing.
In fact, the accessibility of both data and technology—along with a growing recognition of how
the practice of “programmatic” may help media companies overcome daunting challenges
to their underlying business models—are driving vast new interest in the approach, with
publishers and marketers alike rapidly moving to build their global audiences, establish
properties in new markets and forge alliances with partners in markets all over the world.
The 2013 promise of “programmatic everywhere,” it seems, is rapidly becoming
a 2014 reality.
Unfortunately, the shift to an audience culture in media circles hasn’t yet managed to reform
a wider world defined by vastly different political, technological and cultural norms. So even
while they race to build programmatic infrastructure across markets—with U.S. brands moving
to stand up a presence in overseas markets, and “global” brands casting their sights on the
U.S. and elsewhere—digital publishers are confronting a slew of challenges and opportunities
that are both new and unique to each individual market. Where, for example, are local
advertisers most accustomed to engaging with programmatic technology? How do contrasting
regulatory frameworks impact the accessibility of behavioral data? And where are general
market conditions most likely to reward audience investments over the long term?
INTRODUCTION
AND EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
It’s a running joke among the local publisher and agency communities around here. A U.S. company picks up
on the enormous opportunity to expand to ‘Europe,’ opens a tiny office in London and sets out to conquer the
continent. As if it were that easy.
—CHIEF PRODUCT OFFICER, MEDIA OPTIMIZATION PLATFORM, BENELUX REGION




This white paper, published in partnership with the Interactive Advertising Bureau, will explore
these dynamics and present a snapshot of how publishers, marketers and technologists are
“going global” in their practice of programmatic audience development across each of 12
markets. With conclusions derived through a combination of survey and interview data—
encompassing feedback from more than 200 executive-level leaders in the Americas, Europe,
Africa, Asia, Australia and the Middle East—it will show:
• Virtually all respondents to a survey of U.S. and U.S.-based global
publishers (98.3 percent) said they’re currently pursuing a data-
driven, programmatic approach to audience development in their
home market, with 58.6 percent “aggressively pursuing” the same
• By contrast, 72.4 percent of the same panel are currently pursuing
a data-driven, programmatic approach to audience engagement in
non-U.S. markets
• 56.6 percent of U.S. and U.S.-based global technology and
service provider survey respondents said that they’re actively
building programmatic audience development capabilities outside
of the U.S.—with more than half of those “aggressively” pursuing
the same
• Only a third (33.8 percent) of advertisers and publishers said
they’re currently pursuing programmatic audience development
beyond their home borders—though the vast majority of those
surveyed and interviewed expressed an intent to expand their
efforts to do so over the next two years
The concept of “audience development” is firmly
entrenched as a key pillar of digital media strategy
and execution in the U.S.…
… though the same publishers—even when
supporting a global portfolio of media and commerce
properties—have been slightly slower to expand their
programmatic efforts abroad.
The drive to globalize the practice of programmatic
audience development is in full force, pioneered by
advertising technology companies seeking to build
a seamless worldwide presence in advance of their
clients’ expansion efforts…
… and followed increasingly by large publishers
(based primarily in the U.S., U.K. and Western Europe)
seeking to scale their global reach. Meanwhile, smaller
media companies (and those in emerging markets) are
moving to import established programmatic practices
and technology in an effort to drive efficiencies, build
know-how and improve the attractiveness of their
properties to audience-driven advertisers.
• Owing primarily to cultural, language and longstanding business
ties with the U.S. (where most of today’s dominant programmatic
technology and business process was pioneered), survey
respondents said their global programmatic efforts have thus far
been invested primarily in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia
and France
• While new programmatic investment is expected to flood all
regions over the coming years, global practitioners said they
expect to accelerate their efforts the most in emerging markets
(including China and Brazil) as well as Germany—a mature media
market that, compared to its peers, has been slow to initiate and
welcome cross-border audience development efforts
To date, local and cross-border industry efforts to
build “programmatic” capabilities outside the U.S.
have been concentrated in four core markets…
… but publishers, marketers and technologists alike
say they expect to diversify and expand that effort
substantially over the next two years.



 • 52.4 percent of survey respondents cited “third-party data
availability” as the most important consideration when assessing
the attractiveness of a new marketplace, more than any other
factor
• Next on the list of market requirements: the “availability of tools
geared to the needs of audience development use cases,” cited by
47.6 percent of respondents as a factor considered attractive to
new or expanded investment
• Though 43.2 percent of survey respondents said that government
regulation generally detracts from the attractiveness of a given
market for new programmatic investment, only 23.2 percent
said that regulatory concerns rank among the three factors most
actively inhibiting their cross-border efforts
• More than a third of survey respondents (34.2 percent) said that
a “lack of understanding of ‘audience development’ across all
markets” is a substantial inhibitor to their current global efforts—
representing a more daunting challenge than any other
• Another 31.7 percent of respondents said “concerns about
generating results at needed scale” is an active inhibitor of their
programmatic investment, especially with respect to smaller
markets (or those where media distribution is concentrated in
fewer brands)
Above all else, publishers say they look for
available third-party audience data—as well
as suitable programmatic technology, whether
developed in-market or sourced from a global
provider—before deciding whether to build new
media properties or expand audience development
efforts in a given market…
… and while government regulation can serve to
inhibit audience development strategies, its presence
has generally not served to curtail the practice as
much as some may fear.
Standing in the way of richer investment in cross-
border programmatic audience development: a lack of
universal “know-how” when it comes to strategic use
cases, processes and platform applications…
… as well as lingering doubts around the extent
to which the programmatic approach is well suited
to monetize audiences in markets where “scale” is
difficult to achieve.
• Though only 13.7 percent of U.S. and U.S.-based global survey
respondents said they’re actively engaging in programmatic
audience development in Brazil today, 39.1 percent expect to
do so within two years—with 32.6 percent saying they expect to
pursue opportunities in the Brazilian market “substantially.”
Though publishers and advertisers say they expect to
expand their programmatic footprint broadly over
the next two years, perhaps the most promising
intersection of growth opportunity, infrastructure and
digital demand is lurking south of the equator.

And what makes for a marketplace that’s conducive to audience development, programmatic
marketing and other data-driven approaches to media execution? Panelists said that seven
“attractiveness criteria” help distinguish markets that are ideal for both publishers and
marketers looking to go global in their programmatic efforts—whether the aim is to develop
new audiences for their existing properties, establish new properties in emerging markets or
grow partnerships to support their audience extension efforts. They include:
• Embrace of the Audience: an orientation on “audience development”—the use of data to
identify and maintain persistent engagement with consumer populations based on specific
target attributes—as a foundation of the advertising, marketing and/or media strategy
• Programmatic Know-How: an understanding of how business needs drive the adoption
and evolution of specific programmatic marketing use cases, including those linked
specifically to the media transaction (e.g. “open market RTB,” “private marketplace,”
etc.) and those that apply the same automation tools and processes to broader business
purposes (e.g. “customer analytics,” “marketing attribution,” “media mix modeling,” etc.)
• A Transparent, Open Market Culture: a free and fair marketplace for transacting
business, receptive to new entrants—including those founded elsewhere
• Data, Data, Data: the availability of third-party audience data (and legal ability to transact
the same through responsible, consumer-friendly means)
• Technology—and the Means to Use It: the availability of the platforms, tools and
applications—either homegrown or licensed from elsewhere—upon which audiences are
identified and developed (as well as the expertise to leverage the same)
• Standards in Measurement and Accountability: a commitment to develop and maintain
universal standards to govern audience identification, measurement and valuation across
the marketplace, including reliable legal and self-regulatory protections against fraud and
other adverse effects; and
• An Opportunity to Build Scale: an audience population that, either independently or as
aggregated with those from other markets, offers a meaningful opportunity to drive value
for all parties to the media transaction.

This white paper explores the current state and likely evolution of data-driven, programmatic
audience development practices across 12 global markets.
Published in partnership with the Interactive Advertising Bureau—and with the sponsorship of
Adobe, DataXu, Visual IQ, Oracle Marketing Cloud, Quantcast and Selligent—the effort was
bolstered substantially by the research contributions of IAB partner organizations around the
world, who so graciously referred executive-level thought leaders from across their networks
(representing publisher, marketer, agency, service provider and technology constituents of the
industry) to participate in more than 45 intensive in-person and telephone interviews (between
March and July 2014). We are grateful to IAB Australia, IAB Brasil, IAB Canada, IAB France,
BVDW (Germany), IAB Mexico and IAB South Africa for their assistance and support.
Additionally, the paper’s findings are based on an online survey of more than 145 advertiser,
publisher, service provider and technology leaders sourced through U.S. IAB membership (and
compiled between May and June 2014). Though this panel primarily represents companies
based in the U.S., it includes substantial representation from both U.S.-based global
companies (as well as non-U.S. companies that are members of IAB in the U.S.).
Survey Respondents: How would you describe your
organization’s principal business?
Solutions or service
provider (including
technology developer)
49.3%
N=146
Advertiser
4.8%
Publisher
45.9%
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY

The Takeaway: The concept of “audience development” is firmly entrenched as
a key pillar of digital media strategy and execution in the U.S…. though the same
publishers—even when supporting a global portfolio of media and commerce
properties—have been slightly slower to expand their programmatic efforts abroad.
Publishers: To what extent is your organization currently pursuing
data-driven, programmatic approaches to audience engagement…
TOWARD THE
GLOBAL AUDIENCE:
“Programmatic”
in Practice Around
the World
…within the
United States?
…in markets outside of the
United States?
Virtually all respondents to a survey of U.S. and U.S.-
based global publishers (98.3 percent) said they’re
currently pursuing a data-driven, programmatic approach
to audience development in their home market, with 58.6
percent “aggressively pursuing” the same
By contrast, 72.4 percent of the same panel are currently
pursuing a data-driven, programmatic approach to
audience engagement in non-U.S. markets.
27.6%
12.1%
29.3%
12.1%
17.2%
58.6%
19.0%
15.5%
5.2%
1.7%
1
Not
pursuing
at all
1
Not
pursuing
at all
5
Aggressively
pursuing
5
Aggressively
pursuing
2 23 34 4


From a global perspective, data-driven audience engagement is absolutely important. The appetite
across regions is strong, but in a lot of places the sophistication needs to catch up with the interest.
The goal is ‘customer centricity,’ but getting there is not always a straight-forward path… I don’t
think there’s any country or region that doesn’t want to go down this path [of expanded investment in
programmatic marketing]. There’s a definite acknowledgement that it’s a better way to do business,
show ROI and get significant efficiency results. Often we just don’t know where to start when looking
across global regions, but we’re starting to roll out strategies.
—GLOBAL MARKETING SCIENCES LEAD, U.S.-BASED HARDWARE MANUFACTURER
Marketers in Latin America are not really aware of what’s out there [with respect to programmatic use
cases and possible results], and they certainly don’t know how to make it work to their advantage. But
we’re a big agency—a global network—and we can leverage our experience from the U.S. and Europe
to bring that knowledge to Mexico. All the same, this market still has some growing to do.
—CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, MEXICO
IN THEIR OWN
WORDS

The Takeaway: The drive to globalize the practice of programmatic audience
development is in full force, pioneered by advertising technology companies seeking to
build a seamless worldwide presence in advance of their clients’ expansion efforts…
and followed increasingly by large publishers (based primarily in the U.S., U.K. and
Western Europe) seeking to scale their global reach. Meanwhile, smaller media
companies (and those in emerging markets) are moving to import established
programmatic practices and technology in an effort to drive efficiencies, build know-
how and improve the attractiveness of their properties to audience-driven advertisers.
To what extent is your organization currently pursuing data-driven,
programmatic approaches to audience engagement in markets
outside of the United States?
1
Not
pursuing
at all
2 3 4 5
Aggressively
pursuing
Not at
all sure
25.3%
9.4%
14.8%
13.2%
25.4%
15.1%
14.1%
17.0%
19.7%
39.6%
1.4%
5.7%
Advertisers/Publishers Tech/solutions providers
56.6 percent of U.S. and U.S.-based global technology and service provider survey respondents said that
they’re actively building programmatic audience development capabilities outside of the U.S.—with more than
half of those “aggressively” pursuing the same
Only a third (33.8 percent) of advertisers and publishers said they’re currently pursuing programmatic
audience development beyond their home borders—though the vast majority of those surveyed and
interviewed expressed intent to expand their efforts to do so over the next two years
Though practitioners in smaller markets have generally been slower to pursue programmatic tactics (and
certainly less aggressive about expanding those efforts across borders), the appetite to initiate such programs
is growing, spurred on by a growing demand for the efficiency benefits offered by the automation of an
otherwise manual media transaction. In this respect, agencies are playing a particularly influential role in
educating practitioners on both the “supply” and “demand” sides of the table.

Technology/Solutions Providers
Advertisers/Publishers
Aggregate Index:
3.68
2.89

As more advertisers started talking about DMPs and other technologies that they were starting to leverage
in the U.S., we also saw those same tech companies started furious market grabs, selling to everyone.
—GLOBAL DIRECTOR, DIGITAL ADVERTISING AND INSIGHT, GLOBAL PUBLISHER, UNITED KINGDOM
Right now there are 10 times more technology players competing for business than our market can
support. It’s crammed; we have more players than is possible to use, but advertisers and publishers
are learning what solutions are available, and starting to make decisions to buy.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, MARKETING AUTOMATION PLATFORM, BRAZIL
IN THEIR OWN
WORDS

The Takeaway: To date, local and cross-border industry efforts to build
“programmatic” capabilities outside the U.S. have been concentrated in four core
markets… but publishers, marketers and technologists alike say they expect to
diversify and expand that effort substantially over the next two years.
To what extent does your organization pursue data-driven,
programmatic approaches to audience engagement in each of the
following markets? How likely are you to do so within two years?
UK
Do not / will
not pursue
Substantially
pursuing / will
substantially
pursue
Pursuing
somewhat / may
pursue
Canada Australia France Germany Brazil Japan Mexico China/
Hong Kong
South
Africa
Gulf
Region
Now In two years
Owing primarily to cultural, language and longstanding business ties with the U.S. (where most of today’s
dominant programmatic technology and business process was pioneered), survey respondents said their
global programmatic efforts have thus far been invested primarily in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia
and France
While new programmatic investment is expected to flood all regions over the coming years, global practitioners
said they expect to accelerate their efforts the most in emerging markets (including China and Brazil) as well
as Germany—a mature media market that, compared to its peers, has been slow to initiate and welcome
cross-border audience development efforts.
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
5.0


Practices first spread from the U.S. to the U.K…. and both of those markets are far along. The U.K.
has had the benefit of seeing what doesn’t work in the U.S.; [publishers there] learn and leapfrog
ahead. Canada is similar—they’re interested in these approaches and it’s easy to serve the market
from the U.S., so expanding there doesn’t really pose the same challenges in terms of barriers to entry
that exist elsewhere.
—SVP INTERNATIONAL, DIGITAL VERIFICATION PROVIDER, UNITED STATES
There is a growth opportunity in Germany because the money is there and if you get Germany you
have Europe. But so far the smaller European markets have moved faster… Germany is very slow and
methodical in their evaluation and adoption of new systems or processes. It can be slow-going, but
there is an opportunity.
—FOUNDER, MEDIA OPTIMIZATION PLATFORM, BENELUX REGION
IN THEIR OWN
WORDS

The Takeaway: Above all else, publishers say they look for available third-party
audience data—as well as suitable programmatic technology, whether developed
in-market or sourced from a global provider—before deciding whether to build new
media properties or expand audience development efforts in a given market… and
while government regulation can serve to inhibit audience development strategies, its
presence has generally not served to curtail the practice as much as some may fear.
Thinking about the marketplace conditions in the regions where your
company does business, to what extent do you believe each of the
following factors contribute to (or detract from) an ideal climate for
practicing data-driven, programmatic audience engagement?
52.4 percent of survey respondents cited “third-party data availability” as the most important consideration
when assessing the attractiveness of a new marketplace, more than any other factor
Next on the list of market requirements: the “availability of tools geared to the needs of audience
development use cases,” cited by 47.6 percent of respondents as a factor considered attractive to new
or expanded investment
Though 43.2 percent of survey respondents said that government regulation generally detracts from the
attractiveness of a given market for new programmatic investment, only 23.2 percent said that regulatory
concerns rank among the three factors most actively inhibiting their cross-border efforts (see page 16)
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
5.0
Substantially
detracts from the
attractiveness of
an environment
Substantially
contributes to the
attractiveness of
an environment
Neither
contributes
nor detracts
Government
restrictions
on travel/
doing
business in
market
Cultural
resistance to
technologies/
practices
engineered in
other markets
General
sophistication
of business
practices
Stability
of the
underlying
economy
Sophisticated
infrastructure
for the use
of first-party
data
Prevalence
of business
professionals
who speak
the same
language
Technology
geared to
the needs
of audience
development
Prevalence
of
government
regulation
Widespread
availability of
third-party
data

-.48
+.65

Actually, we’re finding that the laws [governing access to third-party data and consumer opt-in
requirements] are becoming more defined across more markets. And [even though we’d clearly prefer
to work without any burdensome regulation], it’s growing easier because the canvas has effectively
been set in most places where we do business. In fact, advertisers rely on us to see what they can do
and can’t do.
—VP SOLUTIONS, DATA MANAGEMENT PLATFORM, FRANCE
Regulatory obstacles and privacy issues of course exist, but they can be dealt with through proper
business processes and technology—so I don’t see them presenting a real barrier to growth. The real
barrier in markets outside of the U.S. is the publishers making the data available.
—CEO, MARKETING INSIGHT DEVELOPMENT AND ACTIVATION PLATFORM, CANADA
There is so much audience information available in the U.S., but that’s not the case elsewhere. When
you expand to other countries there is no data control processes—so clean, quality data just doesn’t
exist to the same extent. It makes expanding into regions really difficult when data is sparse.
—INTERACTIVE MARKETING STRATEGIST, U.S.-BASED GLOBAL SHIPPING PROVIDER
What’s key to growing practices across regions is that the core [data management and transactional
platforms] remain the same. That way, just the data changes depending on the region, but the
technology and the algorithms powering the strategy remain consistent; you just customize with
regional data. Having one system overall is the important part for growing a practice across borders.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, AUDIENCE TARGETING PLATFORM, GERMANY
IN THEIR OWN
WORDS Interview panelists said that government regulation, while a cause of some anxiety, can
generally be managed when guidelines are reasonable and clear…
Accessing the right data and technology resources, on the other hand, is recognized as a
crucial requirement (and not always easy to accomplish)…

The Takeaway: Standing in the way of richer investment in cross-border
programmatic audience development: a lack of universal “know-how” when it comes
to strategic use cases, processes and platform applications… as well as lingering
doubts around the extent to which the programmatic approach is well suited to
monetize audiences in markets where “scale” is difficult to achieve.
What factors, if any, are inhibiting your organization’s ability
to develop an audience engagement practice that spans
national borders?
(Select top 3 factors)
More than a third of survey respondents (34.2 percent) said that a “lack of understanding of ‘audience
development’ across all markets” is a substantial inhibitor to their current global efforts—representing a more
daunting challenge than any other
Another 31.7 percent of respondents said “concerns about generating results at needed scale” is an active
inhibitor of their programmatic investment, especially with respect to smaller markets (or those where media
distribution is concentrated in fewer brands)
34.2%
31.7%
28.1%
23.2%
22.0%
22.0%
15.9%
12.2%
12.2%
8.5%
7.3%
Lack of understanding of “audeience development” across all markets
Concerns about ability to generate results at needed scale
Lack of appropriate technology
Regulatory barriers
Haven’t yet developed a global business case
Lack of appropriate/actionable data assets
Misaligned business processes/operating structures in non-U.S. markets
Suboptimal talent to execute initiatives across regions
Lack of an executive mandate
Misaligned business processes/operating structures in the U.S.
Cultural/language barriers


IN THEIR OWN
WORDS Technology, in some respects, is actually the easiest part of the equation. And as we build up our
data partner network, I think the data will get there too. The challenge is really people and process.
I’m on our global analytics and optimization team, so I’m unique in that I have cross-organization
responsibility. But I step on a lot of toes rolling [audience development strategies] out, since they’re
disruptive to traditional marketing approaches.
—AUDIENCE OPTIMIZATION AND PERSONALIZATION MANAGER, HARDWARE MANUFACTURER, UNITED STATES
The [programmatic] technology is good, that’s not a problem. The real issue is that the buy side hasn’t
caught up with the technology in terms of understanding the use cases that it supports, and how best
to leverage it. But we’re learning.
—CEO, DIGITAL PUBLISHER, SOUTH AFRICA
What I really need is a massive pipeline of solution architects to come out of school and sew all of these
point solutions together, understanding how to extract value from the tools. I didn’t get into this business
to be a plumber, but I spend more and more time doing that. If I can get people who understand the
concepts and the technology to sew this stuff together, that’s what I need. That’s where the magic is.
—VP DIGITAL MARKETING, GLOBAL ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PROVIDER, FRANCE
There is a lot of tension trying to stand up these new approaches. It’s not the same kind of people or
profiles that we’ve always had. Now we have sales people selling things that they don’t understand
and it’s a big problem. Roles are changing and we’re trying to restructure and train people and attract
new talent, but it’s a nightmare.
—CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER, MARKETING SERVICES PROVIDER, CANADA
The biggest challenge [in Mexico] is learning how to use data to uncover insights and make actions.
A lot of people take information/data from their own site, but they don’t do anything with it. In order to
advance we need people who are analysts, people who can generate action and optimize marketing
campaigns and websites.
—VP, GLOBAL RATINGS FIRM, MEXICO
More than anything else, we need more talent—on all sides of the media business. We need more people
that are able to think about digital marketing in a sophisticated, strategic way. We feel that many advertisers
say digital is a priority, but then they don’t really understand it and TV still takes up most of the investment.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, AUDIENCE INTERACTION, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, COLOMBIA
The other real issue for us is scale. How do we leverage programmatic to build enough value to actually
matter? With data you can slice and dice and target, but in a small market there’s a limit to how much value
you can create by slicing a population [into microsegments]. We’ve had to turn down campaigns because
with the strategic parameters the scope became too narrow when only looking across our market.
—PRESIDENT, ADVERTISING NETWORK, CANADA

The Takeaway: Though publishers and advertisers say they expect to expand their
programmatic footprint broadly over the next two years, perhaps the most promising
intersection of growth opportunity, infrastructure and digital demand is lurking south
of the equator.
Though only 13.7 percent of U.S. and U.S.-based global survey respondents said they’re actively engaging in
programmatic audience development in Brazil today, 39.1 percent expect to do so within two years—with 32.6
percent saying they expect to pursue opportunities in the Brazilian market “substantially.” (see page 12)
I’m really bullish about the opportunity in Brazil, but practitioners need to know what they’re up
against in entering the market—understanding the cultural differences, the way of doing business, the
priorities and concerns… Relationships are hugely important here, and it may take some time for new
entrants to appreciate that. Often people expect that when they enter a new market it should move
very quickly, but it actually takes some time.
—FOUNDER, DIGITAL ADVERTISING NETWORK, BRAZIL
Brazil is very important. Looking at digital investments across Latin America, we see 50 percent going
to Brazil. Mexico captures about 15 percent and then the remaining 35 percent is split among the
other countries. Brazil is just huge, with so much potential.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, AUDIENCE INTERACTION, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, COLOMBIA
Mexico is the biggest Spanish market in Latin America and spending on the Internet is increasing at
ten times the economy’s rate. There’s a lot of knowledge in the U.S. and there’s a huge opportunity for
Mexico to get the appropriate technology and learn from the U.S. experience. Mexico is a large, healthy
market that’s showing interest, and it’ll be really exciting to watch it develop.
IN THEIR OWN
WORDS


So You Want to “Go Global”? Seven Critical Prerequisites for
Successful Audience Development
Two years ago, just the mention of the term “programmatic” in the U.S. market provoked a
range of contrasting interpretations—from fulsome optimism (“We’re all-in on programmatic!”)
to stunted cynicism (“Oh no. Not another buzzword!”). Today, though, it’s clear that for many
marketers and publishers, the approach offers a platform upon which they may better engineer
the effectiveness, efficiency and bottom-line value of their advertising interactions.
Elsewhere around the globe, programmatic adoption and maturity levels differ substantially.
But with a few years of audience development experience typically under their belts, panelists
said that a number of universal characteristics clearly distinguish those markets that are well
positioned to reward expanded programmatic investments from those that are further behind
in their evolution. And understanding where various markets sit on that continuum, many said,
is essential to plotting out multi-year growth strategies.
So what are the factors that distinguish a “mature” programmatic marketplace—
one that’s well positioned to support cross-border investment?

Embrace of the Audience: an orientation on “audience development”—the use of data to identify and maintain
persistent engagement with consumer populations based on specific target attributes—as a foundation of the
advertising, marketing and/or media strategy
Programmatic marketing is about automating the transaction of media, leveraging a combination of business rules,
real-time optimization tools and marketplace pricing to support both advertiser and publisher requirements. But
the centerpiece of that effort—and the pillar upon which media investment decisions are ultimately reached—is the
identification and targeting of distinct “audiences” for specific messages and offers. Those audiences (as defined
through the careful analysis of data from many potential sources) represent the ultimate beneficiary of a more
impactful marketing effort—and a growing strategic focus on “audience development,” in turn, represents a step-level
advance in previous approaches that did not, or could not, leverage data for such purposes.
Smaller market sizes (and relative paucity of actionable audience data) may limit
opportunities to identify meaningfully-scaled audiences—limiting broader embrace of
the approach. But technology adoption and global business relationships are typically
driving expanded audience-oriented initiatives.
Market has substantially pivoted to the notion of “audience” as the primary focal
point for strategic marketing, offer management, content targeting and omnichannel
integration (as distinct from other approaches that might seek to leverage, for
example, “context” or media brands as proxies). Rigorous focus on building
actionable audience profiles at the segment or microsegment level and, in more
advanced cases, use of sophisticated attribution models to reinforce the value of
efforts and optimize future approaches.
Burgeoning interest in “data” and its marketing applications, but legacy dominance of
traditional media (and/or concentration of the marketplace in one or a few dominant
brands) may compromise wider migration to audience-centric practices. Where
audience development efforts are in pilot mode, they have often been initiated in
partnership with global efforts spearheaded elsewhere.
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
AUSTRALIA
CANADA
FRANCE
GERMANY
JAPAN
U.S.
U.K.
MEXICO
BRAZIL
CHINA
GULF REGION
SOUTH AFRICA

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
We realized recently that we shouldn’t speak to every user the same way because people are inherently different.
So as we become more of a consumer-focused company, knowing who our audiences are and being able to
segment to engage them appropriately is the priority.
—AUDIENCE OPTIMIZATION AND PERSONALIZATION MANAGER, TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, UNITED STATES
In France we’re just beginning to see publishers realizing that their data is a treasure—demanding more care
than they’ve paid to it in the past. We are working to take that concept deeper, to provide more insights about
audiences and allow media to be bought and sold accordingly.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, FRANCE
Advanced global clients working in Latin America have their own data and they have their own methodologies to
do strategic audience targeting, so they understand this and are doing it. But otherwise, no—smaller and local
marketers really haven’t embraced the concept yet.
—CHIEF DIGITAL OFFICER, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, MEXICO
I think we are in the beginning stages of growth in Brazil... We just have just three or four TV channels and
from those publisher’s perspective, there’s very little reason for them to provide rich data on their audiences.
Advertisers, however, are starting to realize that they can use this type of data to understand their customers and
target them with media, but this is all new.
—FOUNDER, TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM, BRAZIL
Right now the entire ecosystem in South Africa remains quite clearly focused on mainstream media, particularly
TV and radio. The idea of ‘audience development’ and the value of targeted smaller slices of the population is
not really understood. At least not yet.

Programmatic Know-How: an understanding of how business needs drive the adoption and evolution of specific
programmatic marketing use cases, including those linked specifically to the media transaction (e.g. “open market
RTB,” “private marketplace,” etc.) and those that apply the same automation tools and processes to broader business
purposes (e.g. “customer analytics,” “marketing attribution,” “media mix modeling,” “site optimization,” etc.)
As commonly practiced, “programmatic” represents a tactical approach to deploying an “audience development”
strategy across various media. It leverages a combination of tools, embedded business rules and audience
identification/segmentation schema to provide for the optimization of both media effectiveness and efficiency. Markets
that have embraced that potential—and where practitioners are actively pursuing opportunities to tie the activation of
associated use cases to business objectives—present a sound foundation for short-term investment (and payback).
Well established RTB adoption, but typically focused on supporting only “open
market” auction transactions. Interest is growing in complementary media buying use
cases, though alignment of programmatic practices with other business aims is in
very early stages of adoption (or non-existent).
Robust market adoption of real-time bidding (“RTB”) as a core media buying practice
in support of both “reserved” and “unreserved” programs—with expanding interest
in leveraging the same technology and process to support both “private” and “open
market” transactions. Emerging deployment of applications that apply programmatic
infrastructure to business purposes that may be independent from the media
transaction—e.g. customer segmentation, predictive analytics, product development,
website content optimization, causal and cross-channel attribution, etc.
RTB adoption is emerging and/or limited to specific circumstances given, for
example, concentration of dominant publisher brands (Brazil, South Africa) or unique
norms guiding the parceling of advertising inventory for sales purposes (China).
Interest in the practice is typically on the rise, however, especially given expanding
local investment from global publishers and advertisers leveraging programmatic
efforts in other markets.
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
AUSTRALIA
CANADA
FRANCE
GERMANY
JAPAN
U.S.
U.K.
MEXICO
BRAZIL
CHINA
GULF REGION
SOUTH AFRICA

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
We’ve been focused on [leveraging programmatic buying] for the display space, but in the coming year
we’re going to start taking it further… We are trying to do things like dynamic targeting and dynamic content
deployment based on audience profiles.
—INTERACTIVE MARKETING STRATEGIST, GLOBAL SHIPPING PROVIDER, UNITED STATES
In too many markets, programmatic is still about ‘How cheaply can I buy a bunch of inventory?’ and that’s not
advancing the conversation on what the approach can really offer in terms of finding an audience first and foremost.
Right now, the preoccupation is in getting the best price and that’s standing in the way of progress for so many.
—GLOBAL DIRECTOR, DIGITAL ADVERTISING AND INSIGHT, GLOBAL PUBLISHER, UNITED KINGDOM
When you say ‘programmatic’ in France today it’s not necessarily only RTB, but it’s mostly RTB. RTB is the
trendy thing and we expect it to continue growing very fast.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, FRANCE
Programmatic grew a lot last year in Germany and it is still growing this year. When we talk about programmatic,
we are referring to ‘RTA,’ or ‘real-time advertising,’ which includes private exchanges. The German market
structure is more premium focused, so maybe we are more advanced in that respect—it’s not just RTB when we
talk about programmatic—but the U.S. and U.K. are certainly ahead of us in terms of using automation to power
more use cases.
—DIRECTOR DATA SOLUTIONS, DATA MANAGEMENT PLATFORM, GERMANY
Right now we haven’t yet moved to embrace the concept of programmatic ‘use cases,’ and in fact, we tend to
shy away from the concept as most publishers don’t want to dilute their inventory… We don’t want to play in the
commoditized race to the bottom, but instead want to deliver premium offerings to advertisers and readers…
At the moment, we’re not quite sure what programmatic will do to our inventory value.
—PUBLISHER, DIGITAL PUBLISHER, SOUTH AFRICA
We started with programmatic buying in the past year. It’s important for our big clients—major global brands—
because they understand what it is and what it means. Smaller clients have a little more trouble understanding
programmatic. But change has been slowly occurring, and smaller clients are starting to get accustomed to it.
—DIRECTOR DIGITAL PLANNING, GLOBAL MEDIA AGENCY, MEXICO
The unique thing about the Japanese market is that although RTB has developed well, it’s unique in its structure.
It’s siloed; rather than there being an open RTB environment, there are a number of key agency players that
have created their own ecosystems where they control both the supply and demand sides, and as a result, each
prioritizes their own inventory.
—FOUNDER, MEDIA ADVISORY FIRM, JAPAN
Programmatic is still new here, and people are just starting to talk about it. Most of the customers are using it for
remnant inventory through RTB. A few are using data to target better media buys, but that is the exception, not
the rule, in Brazil today.
—FOUNDER, AD TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM, BRAZIL

A Transparent, Open Market Culture: a free and fair marketplace for transacting business, receptive to new
entrants—including those founded elsewhere
Aggregation and sharing of data is fundamental to the practice of audience development, and doing so in a
consumer-friendly way requires the maintenance of an open marketplace—where media, data and technology can be
freely transacted within the boundaries of industry best practices (and reasonable regulatory oversight). Open markets
also help to breed constant innovation—and stifle anti-competitive attempts to protect powerful legacy interests.
Large, predominately transparent and dynamic markets with burgeoning interest in
both digital media and programmatic audience development, but cultural preference
to do business within its own borders—or the entrenched dominance (and reach) of
legacy media, like TV—can serve to slow the progress of new entrants.
Generally open and welcoming to new entrants, without substantial bias for
homegrown players (or opposition to those from other markets). Larger market sizes
tend to support a richer competitive atmosphere and regulation, where it exists, is
generally clear and well documented.
Usually open and welcoming of new investment, but smaller market sizes, or
concentration among a few powerful players, reduce the effective competitive
opportunity, which can establish effective protective barriers around established
media and technology providers (and, in some cases, even dissuade investment in
programmatic audience development).
Substantial regulatory barriers—particularly as they relate to the free exchange of
information and the rights of foreign entities—limit access to both data and media.
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
U.S.
U.K.
AUSTRALIA
CANADA
FRANCE
GERMANY
JAPAN
BRAZIL
CHINA
GULF REGION
MEXICO
SOUTH AFRICA

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
Germany, in particular, is a technologically advanced country. They don’t have a problem with platform
sophistication, but they tend to have a preference for German-made solutions, which can hurt the market
overall if others are not able to enter or innovate.
China is the long pole—it’s a big market and major area of focus but it’s also a unique challenge because of
the uniqueness of the market—the government control, the size of the market and the language. It’s basically
a perfect storm of hurdles and barriers to entry, but we want to get it right.
—GLOBAL MARKETING SCIENCES LEAD, COMPUTER MANUFACTURER, UNITED STATES
In South Africa, the effects of apartheid on the business mindset are interesting and somewhat lasting. For
a long time, folks were unable to do business outside of the country, so it created a largely self-contained
ecosystem. As a result, there’s a lot of apartheid-thinking: a lot of emphasis on borders, and on building wholly
internal partnerships. That’s still a pervasive legacy.
—ADVISOR, SEARCH MARKETING AGENCY, SOUTH AFRICA
Japan is open to ideas from elsewhere; it’s not a question of your nationality, it’s more of a question of how
committed you are to the market. If you have a good, unique value-added offer, people here want to hear you
out… [That said, the powerful agency sector in Japan does limit some of the market’s ‘openness.’] I think
the advertisers and publishers would like more of a flat environment where they could transact more openly,
but the agencies have a lot of power and they have been controlling the system. My personal feeling is that it
would be better if it wasn’t this way, but those in control have no incentive to change.

Data, Data, Data: the availability of third-party audience data (and legal ability to transact the same through responsible,
consumer-friendly means) as well as a mature infrastructure related to collecting and using first-party audience data
In an increasingly cluttered digital world, delivering a superior user experience—across advertising impressions,
published news and content, e-commerce platforms and other touchpoints—requires access to a rich repository of
information on visitors and their likely wants, needs and behaviors. “First-” and “second-party” data (that which is
aggregated directly by an end user or sourced through its business partners, respectively) are critical to this effort,
but so too is “third-party” data (that which is transacted in an open market environment, pursuant to responsible
collection and use guidelines), which helps build a comprehensive view of the consumer (and the availability of which
speaks to the dynamism of a marketplace and its effective “audience economy.”)
Relatively few barriers to access, but availability is typically very limited (given size of
the markets and/or early-stage adoption of programmatic audience development);
data quality can be an issue.
Ample availability on the open market through data exchanges and similar platforms,
promoting a robust marketplace. Barriers to access are low, though the looming
threat of enhanced regulatory oversight—and the potential impact of browser settings
that are defaulted to “do-not-track” mode—could substantially diminish availability
in the years ahead. Viability/contribution of third-party data use cases is evolving
(capturing more attention than the question of “access”).
High demand, but relatively high regulatory barriers—in particular, the European Union
Data Protection Directive, which classifies most digitally-generated behavioral data as
“personal data” for oversight purposes—effectively limits the ability of aggregators to
trade information, especially outside the E.U. or to organizations that have not agreed
to adhere to the U.S.-E.U. Safe Harbor Framework.
Highly concentrated, influential agency landscape (bolstered by protectionist
regulation) effectively manages most data assets, making them available only as a
by-product of their affiliated media transactions.
Though first-party data aggregation is common and practiced widely among
publishers (usually through site/email registration and opt-in processes), few
third-party data assets are available. In some instances, publishers and others are
beginning to band together to create usable (and sharable) data assets via second-
party networks or associations, but these efforts are nascent.
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
U.S.
U.K.
AUSTRALIA
CANADA
FRANCE
GERMANY
JAPAN
BRAZIL
CHINA
GULF REGION
MEXICO
SOUTH AFRICA

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
The availability of data is key. And in markets where digital behavioral data, or cookie-based data, isn’t
available—such as the U.K. and Europe in general—other forms of data are even more critical. In very
regulated regions, non-cookie-based data can provide practitioners with an edge where otherwise there’s
basically liquidity.
Because we don’t have an incentive for customers to log-in to our site, all of our users are anonymous and we
have to rely on third-party data. In the U.S. this is fine, but in other regions it’s hard since the quality of data is
significantly lower, it makes it difficult to base business strategy on it.
—AUDIENCE OPTIMIZATION AND PERSONALIZATION MANAGER, HARDWARE MANUFACTURER, UNITED STATES
It’s interesting, I think marketers in Germany are very educated in terms of data, but it is difficult to get good
data here. Everyone one is looking for it, but there are only a small number of providers available. In that
sense, despite a more sophisticated understanding, practices are still rudimentary.
In Japan, the most important consideration is that on the data side, the data still remains tied to the media in
each of the agency silos. There isn’t an open market for data… you have to go to these agency providers and
they sell you data as a component of the media buy, but it’s not a separate entity.

Technology—and the Means to Use It: the availability of the platforms, tools and applications—either homegrown or
licensed from elsewhere—upon which audiences are identified and developed (as well as the expertise to leverage the same)
If data is the fuel that powers audience development, then technology is the engine that puts it to work. Over the last
decade, a robust industry of standalone and integrated platforms—designed to support the real-time management,
optimization and activation of data, media and direct marketing communications—has emerged on the global
marketplace, and practitioners who have broad access to these tools (as well as the expertise needed to maximize
their investments) typically enjoy competitive advantages. In supporting audience development efforts, these may
variously include tools addressing the following functionality:
• Data management (through data management platforms, or DMPs), tag management and data
onboarding/integration
• Demand- and supply-side media optimization (through DSPs and SSPs)
• Measurement, attribution and reporting
• Content verification, brand safety and privacy management
• Creative and content optimization
• Media planning, ad serving and ad operations; and
• Marketing automation (supporting, among other functions, marketing resource management, campaign
management and asset management).
Home to a preponderance of the advertising and marketing technology platforms
in use by enterprises around the globe today, and likewise, where virtually all core
platform disciplines were pioneered (representing that functionality which has
been adopted and is now offered by developers in other markets). Technological
innovation, platform consolidation and investment from independent financial interests
continues at a rapid pace.
Widespread adoption of platforms at the enterprise level; mid-sized and smaller
market participants are engaging with technology more inconsistently, though
adoption is growing (largely with the support of agencies and other service provider
partners). Credible homegrown tools—often engineered for unique use cases and
regulatory requirements—emerging at a rapid pace, often with strategic intent to
compete at a regional level (particularly in Europe) or globally.
Adoption of the “full suite” of available audience development tools has been
inconsistent, with that adoption driven in large part by agencies, who command
substantial leverage with respect to both data and the execution of their clients’
media strategies. Nevertheless, interest in the burgeoning technology space is
high and in some cases (particularly with respect to Brazil), homegrown tools have
emerged that compete readily with global entrants. Cultural and language issues—
including, for example, the presence of in-market sales and engineering support—can
present challenge to successful market entry.
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
U.S.
U.K.
AUSTRALIA
CANADA
FRANCE
GERMANY
JAPAN
BRAZIL
MEXICO

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
The good news is that the technology implications are not prohibitive. We have enough technology established
and in place to start moving the needle against the customer-centricity target. Right now it’s more about
figuring out the appropriate use cases that are the highest priority in each market.
—GLOBAL MARKETING SCIENCES LEAD, COMPUTER MANUFACTURER, UNITED STATES
Technology is never the problem. You can make technology do anything you want. But, if you don’t know
what business process you’re trying to improve, create or enable, your technology team is useless. If you do
know that, and you know it well, technology can make the magic happen. But you always have to start
with process.
There is a lot of technology in Germany. Lots of providers are available here whether they are native or from
the U.S. In that respect it’s not about the lack of technology that’s holding up practices, but more about each
company finding the right technology to fit their business and needs.
We are trying to introduce our DMP to the Brazilian market. It doesn’t mean everyone is buying it or using the
technology today, but it is the hot topic to talk about. People are really interested and they are learning and will
adopt and start using soon.
—MANAGING DIRECTOR, GLOBAL MARKETING AUTOMATION PLATFORM, BRAZIL
Adoption of the holistic advertising and marketing technology “stack” is still largely
nascent, but where it exists, platforms are primarily homegrown and/or sourced from
markets with strong regional or cultural ties (i.e. Western Europe, in the case of South
Africa; Singapore, in the case of China). Early-stage programmatic adoption (and
stringent regulatory barriers, in some cases) have further limited deeper technology
adoption or encouraged in-market agencies to engineer custom solutions to suit
client need.
CHINA
GULF REGION
SOUTH AFRICA

Standards in Measurement and Accountability: a commitment to develop and maintain universal standards to
govern audience identification, measurement and valuation across the marketplace
The basis of a fair, free and productive marketplace is a unified currency—allowing buyers and sellers to ascribe
meaningful and measurable value to any asset they may seek to transact (in this case of audience development:
media, data and/or technology). But assigning specific monetary value to an intangible asset—such as an
“audience”—is fraught with difficulty; as a proxy, constituents on both the demand and supply sides of the
marketplace must work to develop, nurture and employ a series of complementary metrics that illustrate the size,
intent, actionability and confidence level of a given audience. Transparency and clarity also help shine a light on bad
actors, whose attempts to defraud and/or exploit process loopholes threaten to undermine the good intentions and
investments of legitimate media, marketing and technology constituents around the world. Further progress with
respect to accurate measurement, holistic, omnichannel attribution and valuation of audiences and media will help
buyers and sellers equally determine the “true value” of programmatic resources, helping business leaders on both
sides make more efficient investment decisions.
Though the global marketplace (largely through trade associations and dedicated
third-party technology and service providers) is rapidly moving to recognize and tackle
the “accountability issue,” those efforts are largely still nascent. Much work remains
to be done at all levels—global, regional, market-specific and individual—to define,
employ and optimize the audience and media metrics that may be used to establish
consistency in the way those assets are valued (and, ultimately, to substantiate
investments in the same). While practitioners in the most advanced markets, namely
the U.S. and U.K., have done most to adopt sophisticated methodologies for digital
measurement and cross-channel attribution, all markets—and practitioners on all
sides of the media equation—could benefit from increased focus on this area.
Though fraud and transactional transparency (especially with respect to open market
RTB interactions) remain ongoing challenges in many markets, they have not, to date,
served to substantially dissuade investment in approaches, although more clarity
around measurement and attribution would go a long way to promote additional
investment—and reassure those investing that their budgets were well spent.
In a very real sense, progress on this front should serve to help both publishers and
advertisers conquer the century-old dilemma famously espoused by U.S. retailer John
Wanamaker: “Half my advertising is wasted. The trouble is I don’t know what half.”
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
U.K.
AUSTRALIA
CANADA
FRANCE
GERMANY
JAPAN
BRAZIL
CHINA
GULF REGION
MEXICO
SOUTH AFRICA
U.S.

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
Right now, spending on display advertising is basically just funny money. Marketers know they need to do it
but the performance hasn’t been standardized so they have no way to evaluate what they’re getting out of it…
We need transparency more than anything else. Attribution and measurement is key. More than just having
data, you need to understand what’s happening… More than a brand safety issue or a viewability issue, it’s
getting a holistic view that would allow you to measure efforts appropriately… a causal attribution.
Right now, marketers think they know what the user is worth to them—while the publisher typically feels
something about the value of their inventory. Neither party understands the other side and there is no credible
overall truth. Each has a value for his own position but there’s no Venn diagram that overlaps. We need that
before things can advance.
—PRESIDENT, ADVERTISING NETWORK, CANADA
We started to institute our own metrics for measurement, because nothing really existed before. How you
track a campaign in the U.S. wasn’t the same as elsewhere. To get a global perspective was very difficult as it
was very hard to marry the data across regions, so having a standard helps.
—INTERACTIVE MARKETING STRATEGIST, GLOBAL SHIPPING PROVIDER, UNITED STATES
The value measurement is where the industry needs to sort itself out. CPM was consistent with old school
print. Whether it gave you value in the end was another story, but it was consistent and you knew how to
look at it. Where’s CPM in the digital space? It’s all over the place. One of our customers was excited that a
YouTube video got hits, but do we care? What does that do for you? We don’t know. Somewhere, the Holy
Grail is a consistent value metric for online media.
If I could snap my fingers and get a wish that would advance audience development practices it would be
to build a better valuation metric for the brand impact of digital approaches that would move away from ‘last
click’ attribution to more nuanced understanding of the value of exposure. If it was clear what was being
purchased, practitioners could feel better about investing.

An Opportunity to Build Scale: an audience population that, either independently or as aggregated with those from
other markets, offers a meaningful opportunity to drive value for all parties to the media transaction
One of the core motives driving publisher and technology organizations to pursue global growth opportunities is
the idea of audience extension; in short, interest-specific audiences that would otherwise be too small to merit an
investment in targeted media within any one market could be aggregated with like-minded segments from others
to achieve an economical scale—an audience of substantial enough size to merit enterprise investment. At this
comparably early stage of “audience culture” adoption, though, spending decisions are still typically gauged on the
basis of individual-market opportunity. And markets that simply don’t offer the same consumer reach—either because
the population is smaller, or because those consumers are interacting with different forms of media—will have a longer
road to true programmatic maturity.
Widely coveted (due to its sheer size and young, digital-savvy
population) but as yet sidestepped by many foreign media
companies and technologists, owing largely to conditions related
to its centralized economy. Media channels and marketing
spending authority is concentrated in relatively few hands (and influenced heavily by the government), the free
exchange of information is heavily regulated (with some brands, such as Facebook, formally blocked from public
access) and the practice of audience-centered programmatic marketing has been largely marginalized by inventory
practices that favor direct transactions based on timing and brand placement, not data-triggered events.
By far the largest and most mature of the “advanced” audience-
centered markets, rapidly turning its attention to the integration
and “programmaticization” of all media channels as components
of omnichannel strategies. Increasingly, focus in this regard is
shifting to both mobile and addressable television.
The beneficiary of substantial homegrown technology investment
over the last three years, the market will benefit from intense
worldwide media exposure (and likely investment) linked to its
hosting of the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Summer Olympics. The
entrenched dominance of television media, however (as well as the strong influence of its largest publisher, Globo,
and broader network of in-market agencies) has served to dampen wider investment in both digital marketing,
generally, and audience development, more specifically.
Large, diverse and digitally-centric market with relatively mature
programmatic infrastructure (dominated principally by its influential
agency sector). Concerns over economic stagnation, more
than any other factor, have served to modestly depress more
aggressive efforts at independent innovation and investment from abroad.
WHAT?
WHY?
WHERE?
CHINA^
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
45.8%1,373.8
U.S.
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
84.2%318.3
BRAZIL
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
51.6%202.8
JAPAN
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
86.3%127.0

Growing rapidly (and benefitting somewhat from its geographic
proximity to the U.S.), the market is often promoted as a potential
hub for advertising and marketing efforts across all Spanish-
speaking markets of Central and South America. The development
of audience development use cases has been slow to take hold to date, though, given the strong influence of the
television channel and highly influential agency sector (which, as is typical in lesser developed markets, has not yet
established a case for migration to programmatic media to satisfy its own economic interests).
Early adopters of programmatic technology (and, where data
has been available, advanced audience development use cases),
media and technology emerging from Europe’s “big three”
markets are rapidly influencing the roll out of similar approaches
across the continent and elsewhere. In the cases of both
France and Germany, business norms rooted in cultural practice
can sometimes present challenges to market entrants from
abroad, though panelists said these issues are receding somewhat amidst the rapid pace of innovation across the
programmatic enterprise—driving participants to more readily engage with partners, clients and others in a “global
audience economy.”
More modestly sized than their global peers (from a population
perspective), these markets have nonetheless been early and
eager adopters of both digital marketing and the media buying
technologies associated with first-generation programmatic use
cases (such as open market RTB). Though the economics of
scale are commonly cited as a potential obstacle to more fulsome
investment, the close economic and social ties of all four regions
to larger peers—South Africa to most of Western Europe (as
well as an entry point to the African continent), the Gulf region to the Indian subcontinent, Canada to the U.S. and
Australia to the U.S., U.K. and southeast Asia—have renewed a focus on audience extension in each market.
* Source: Various, including most recent government estimates and U.S. Census Bureau Population Clock
# Source: World Bank
^ Including the Hong Kong and Macau special administrative regions
+ Includes Saudi Arabia (30.0 million inhabitants), the United Arab Emirates (9.4 million), Oman (4.0 million), Kuwait (3.1 million),
Qatar (2.2 million) and Bahrain (1.2 million).
MEXICO
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
43.5%119.7
U.K.
FRANCE
GERMANY
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
84.0%80.7
81.9%
89.8%
65.9
64.1
CANADA
GULF REGION
AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AFRICA
Population*
(in millions)
Internet Usage, as
% of Population #
Market
48.9%53.0
68.9%
85.8%
83.0%
49.9+
35.4
23.5

IN THEIR OWN WORDS
The Brazilian market is the biggest [opportunity in Latin America] but the publisher side of the equation is very
concentrated—just a few companies basically own all of the publishers in Brazil—so until they decide that
selling inventory based on audience segments and programmatic is in their best interest, they won’t make the
inventory available, though we expect this to change in the coming years.
Programmatic really started in Mexico 1.5 years ago with RTB buying. We have a few companies in Mexico
offering the first wave of buying this way and I think this will increase very fast but today it’s not a huge part of
media strategy in Mexico. Ten percent of people talking about programmatic in Mexico actually understand it.
But once that improves, the opportunity is massive.
The Canadian agencies are trying to figure out their place in this ecosystem. With data and an increasingly
global program run by centralized strategy derived from the data insights, will you really need an agency only
focused on the Canadian market? Will that make sense?
—VP INNOVATION, PUBLISHING COMPANY, CANADA
Businesses and service providers are realizing that the West is not continuing to grow, and the real opportunity
is in emerging markets… brands are entering our market with the goal of making South Africa the entry point
and then expanding to the continent from there. They see the whole region as an opportunity to scale.
—ADVISOR, SEARCH MARKETING AGENCY, SOUTH AFRICA

In the very early days of programmatic media buying—back when the term suggested little
more than “RTB,” even among its most sophisticated practitioners—the practice often fell
victim to intense scrutiny. “Race to the bottom!” the skeptics would complain, forewarning a
future where automation technology would serve to devalue both media and the human beings
invested in its creation, packaging and deployment.
Nearly a decade later, the U.S. market is increasingly coming to see programmatic as
something more: a means of activating marketing strategies oriented around the audience,
and, in doing so, deliver more compelling experiences to the same. Other early-adopter
markets—perhaps most notably including Australia, Canada, the U.K. and others in Western
Europe—are similarly evolving from that early mindset and deploying a progressively more
sophisticated array of audience development use cases.
Elsewhere around the world, maturity levels differ. And the market conditions that make both
“audience development” and “programmatic” possible likewise vary substantially—with
access to (and availability) of data, technology, expertise, media and other key ingredients
differing based on both cyclical and secular trends that are specific to individual markets.
Almost universally, though, the business drivers behind early-stage, intermediate and mature
programmatic investments are the same: engage digital consumers, optimize marketing
investments and elevate the value of digital media for both consumers and commercial
purposes alike.
Though challenges remain (and the skeptics continue to sing the same song about the
shortcomings of data, technology and process automation) the promise of “programmatic
everywhere” is finally beginning to materialize. The extent to which its practitioners are able to
realize it for themselves will depend upon their commitment to identify—and activate—the use
cases most appropriate to their business goals.
IN CONCLUSION

WINTERBERRY GROUP is a unique strategic consulting firm that supports the growth of advertising,
marketing, media, information and technology organizations. Our services include:
CORPORATE STRATEGY: The Opportunity Mapping strategic development process helps clients
prioritize their available customer, channel and capability growth options, informed by a synthesis of
market insights and intensive internal analysis.
MARKET INTELLIGENCE: Comprehensive industry trend, vertical market and value chain research
provides in-depth analysis of customers, market developments and potential opportunities as a
precursor to any growth or transaction strategy.
MARKETING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION AND ALIGNMENT: Process mapping, marketplace benchmarking and
holistic system engineering efforts are grounded in deep industry insights and “real-world” understandings—
with a focus on helping advertisers, marketers and publishers better leverage their core assets.
MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS DUE DILIGENCE SUPPORT SERVICES: Company assessments
and industry landscape reports provide insight into trends, forecasts and comparative transaction data
needed for reliable financial model inputs, supporting the needs of strategic and financial acquirers to
make informed investment decisions and lay the foundation for value-focused ownership.
Additionally, Winterberry Group is differentiated through its affiliation with Petsky Prunier LLC,
the leading investment bank serving the technology, media, marketing, e-commerce and healthcare
industries. Together, the two firms provide one of the largest and most experienced sources of
strategic and transactional services in their addressable markets.
For more information, please visit www.winterberrygroup.com.
The INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING BUREAU (IAB) is comprised of more than 600 leading media and
technology companies that are responsible for selling 86% of online advertising in the United States.
The IAB empowers the media and marketing industries to thrive in the digital economy. The organization
educates marketers, agencies, media companies and the wider business community about the value
of interactive advertising. Working with its member companies, the IAB evaluates and recommends
standards and practices and fields critical research on interactive advertising. Founded in 1996, the IAB is
headquartered in New York City with a Public Policy office in Washington, D.C.
For more information, please visit www.iab.net.
IN PARTNERSHIP
WITH:

Adobe is a global leader in digital marketing and digital media solutions. Our tools and services allow our customers to
create groundbreaking digital content, deploy it across media and devices, measure and optimize it over time, and achieve
greater business success. We help our customers make, manage, measure, and monetize their content across every channel
and screen.
For more information, please visit www.adobe.com
DataXu is transforming the way companies build their brands in a digital world through the industry’s only fully integrated
programmatic marketing solution. The DataXu Platform offers cloud based software that leverages data science to help
enterprise marketers better understand and engage consumers throughout the buying journey, and optimally manage
marketing investments for more efficient and effective customer acquisition strategies. With 11 offices in eight countries,
DataXu services more than 700 brands across the globe.
For more information, please visit www.dataxu.com
Visual IQ produces the world’s most powerful cross-channel marketing attribution software products. As a pioneer in the
space, the company has been offering products since 2006. Its SaaS-based IQ Intelligence Suite reveals cross channel
performance insights hidden deep within companies’ marketing data, providing actionable recommendations and optimized
media plans—at the audience segment level—to improve marketing effectiveness. These recommendations enable marketers
and agencies to adjust their advertising strategies and tactics to significantly increase marketing ROI across their entire
marketing mix—both online and offline. The functionality behind these products combines a powerful, user-friendly interface
with multi-dimensional fractional attribution science and predictive analytics that clearly and accurately show marketers where
opportunities exist for improvement.
Visual IQ was named a leader in both interactive attribution and cross-channel attribution by a leading market research firm
in 2012, won the 2014 ASPY Award for Best Data or Analytics Solution, and was a finalist in the Most Influential Agency/
Vendor category of the 2013 and 2014 Digital Analytics Association Excellence Awards. The company is a member of the
Advertising Technology, Data, Public Policy and CFO Councils of the IAB, as well as on the Standards Committee of the
Digital Analytics Association.
For more information, please visit www.visualiq.com
PREMIER
SPONSORS:

SUPPORTING
SPONSORS:
Modern Marketers choose Oracle Marketing Cloud solutions to create ideal customers and increase revenue. They use
integrated information from cross-channel, content, and social marketing with data management and activation to deliver
personalized customer experiences across all marketing channels.
For more information, please visit www.oracle.com
Quantcast is a technology company specializes in real-time advertising and audience measurement. As the pioneer of direct
audience measurement in 2006, Quantcast has today the most in-depth understanding of digital audiences across web and
mobile, allowing marketers and publishers to make the smartest choices as they buy and sell the most effective targeted
advertising on the market. Quantcast is dedicated to making display as relevant and effective as search, and currently
delivers outstanding advertising campaigns for the world’s leading’s advertisers and publishers, and brings accurate audience
measurement to over 100 million digital destinations.
For more information, please visit: www.quantcast.com.
Selligent is a fast-growing international marketing automation provider. More than 400 brands in Europe use our solution to
power their customer engagement programs. Europe’s leading retailers, financial services companies and publishers use the
Selligent platform to orchestrate their customer communications across multiple channels, including email, site optimization,
social, mobile and call center. As an omnichannel audience engagement platform, Selligent can reach beyond customers
to drive personalization for anonymous site visitors and bring a true audience approach to relationship marketing by layering
behavioral data on top of traditional CRM databases. In the face of considerable demand from U.S. marketers for Selligent’s
comprehensive feature set, customer centricity, agility and predictable value pricing, our European-born platform will be
launching in the U.S. in late 2014.
For more information, please visit: www.selligent.com

NOTICE
This report contains brief, selected information and analysis pertaining to the advertising,
marketing, media and technology industries and has been prepared by Winterberry Group LLC
in partnership with the Interactive Advertising Bureau. It does not purport to be all-inclusive
or to contain all of the information that a prospective manager, investor or lender may require.
Projections and opinions in this report have been prepared based on information provided
by third parties. Neither Winterberry Group, the Interactive Advertising Bureau, nor their
respective sponsors make any representations or assurances that this information is complete
or completely accurate, as it relies on self-reported data from industry leaders—including
advertisers, marketing service providers, publishers, technology developers and agencies.
Neither Winterberry Group, the Interactive Advertising Bureau (nor any of their officers,
employees, representatives or controlling persons) make any representation as to the accuracy
or completeness of this report or any of its contents, nor shall any of the forgoing have any
liability resulting from the use of the information contained herein or otherwise supplied.

Programmatic Audience Development - July 2014

More Related Content

What's hot (15)

Similar to Programmatic Audience Development - July 2014 (20)

More from Margarita Zlatkova (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Programmatic Audience Development - July 2014