SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Quick & Merge Sort.ppt

Download as PPT, PDF
M
MuhammadSheraz836877

Mergesort and Quicksort are two efficient sorting algorithms that run in O(n log n) time. Mergesort uses a divide-and-conquer approach, recursively splitting the list into halves until individual elements remain, then merging the sorted halves back together. Quicksort chooses a pivot element and partitions the list into elements less than or greater than the pivot, then recursively sorts the sublists until the entire list is sorted.

Education
1 of 67
Download to read offline
1
2
Most read
3
4
5
6
7
8
Most read
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Mergesort and Quicksort Chapter 8 Kruse and Ryba
Sorting algorithms • Insertion, selection and bubble sort have quadratic worst-case performance • The faster comparison based algorithm ? O(nlogn) • Mergesort and Quicksort
Merge Sort • Apply divide-and-conquer to sorting problem • Problem: Given n elements, sort elements into non-decreasing order • Divide-and-Conquer: – If n=1 terminate (every one-element list is already sorted) – If n>1, partition elements into two or more sub- collections; sort each; combine into a single sorted list • How do we partition?
Partitioning - Choice 1 • First n-1 elements into set A, last element set B • Sort A using this partitioning scheme recursively – B already sorted • Combine A and B using method Insert() (= insertion into sorted array) • Leads to recursive version of InsertionSort() – Number of comparisons: O(n2) • Best case = n-1 • Worst case = 2 ) 1 ( 2     n n i c n i
Partitioning - Choice 2 • Put element with largest key in B, remaining elements in A • Sort A recursively • To combine sorted A and B, append B to sorted A – Use Max() to find largest element  recursive SelectionSort() – Use bubbling process to find and move largest element to right-most position  recursive BubbleSort() • All O(n2)
Partitioning - Choice 3 • Let’s try to achieve balanced partitioning • A gets n/2 elements, B gets rest half • Sort A and B recursively • Combine sorted A and B using a process called merge, which combines two sorted lists into one – How? We will see soon
Example • Partition into lists of size n/2 [10, 4, 6, 3] [10, 4, 6, 3, 8, 2, 5, 7] [8, 2, 5, 7] [10, 4] [6, 3] [8, 2] [5, 7] [4] [10] [3][6] [2][8] [5][7]
Example Cont’d • Merge [3, 4, 6, 10] [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 ] [2, 5, 7, 8] [4, 10] [3, 6] [2, 8] [5, 7] [4] [10] [3][6] [2][8] [5][7]
Static Method mergeSort() Public static void mergeSort(Comparable []a, int left, int right) { // sort a[left:right] if (left < right) {// at least two elements int mid = (left+right)/2; //midpoint mergeSort(a, left, mid); mergeSort(a, mid + 1, right); merge(a, b, left, mid, right); //merge from a to b copy(b, a, left, right); //copy result back to a } }
Merge Function
Evaluation • Recurrence equation: • Assume n is a power of 2 c1 if n=1 T(n) = 2T(n/2) + c2n if n>1, n=2k
Solution By Substitution: T(n) = 2T(n/2) + c2n T(n/2) = 2T(n/4) + c2n/2 T(n) = 4T(n/4) + 2 c2n T(n) = 8T(n/8) + 3 c2n T(n) = 2iT(n/2i) + ic2n Assuming n = 2k, expansion halts when we get T(1) on right side; this happens when i=k T(n) = 2kT(1) + kc2n Since 2k=n, we know k=logn; since T(1) = c1, we get T(n) = c1n + c2nlogn; thus an upper bound for TmergeSort(n) is O(nlogn)
Quicksort Algorithm Given an array of n elements (e.g., integers): • If array only contains one element, return • Else – pick one element to use as pivot. – Partition elements into two sub-arrays: • Elements less than or equal to pivot • Elements greater than pivot – Quicksort two sub-arrays – Return results
Example We are given array of n integers to sort: 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
Pick Pivot Element There are a number of ways to pick the pivot element. In this example, we will use the first element in the array: 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
Partitioning Array Given a pivot, partition the elements of the array such that the resulting array consists of: 1. One sub-array that contains elements >= pivot 2. Another sub-array that contains elements < pivot The sub-arrays are stored in the original data array. Partitioning loops through, swapping elements below/above pivot.
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index
40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 4 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
Partition Result 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] <= data[pivot] > data[pivot]
Recursion: Quicksort Sub-arrays 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] <= data[pivot] > data[pivot]
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time?
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree?
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n) – Number of accesses in partition?
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n) – Number of accesses in partition? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n)
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time?
Quicksort: Worst Case • Assume first element is chosen as pivot. • Assume we get array that is already in order: 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] > data[pivot] <= data[pivot]
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree?
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(n) – Number of accesses per partition?
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(n) – Number of accesses per partition? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time: O(n2)!!!
Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time: O(n2)!!! • What can we do to avoid worst case?
Improved Pivot Selection Pick median value of three elements from data array: data[0], data[n/2], and data[n-1]. Use this median value as pivot.
Improving Performance of Quicksort • Improved selection of pivot. • For sub-arrays of size 3 or less, apply brute force search: – Sub-array of size 1: trivial – Sub-array of size 2: • if(data[first] > data[second]) swap them – Sub-array of size 3: left as an exercise.

More Related Content

PPT
3.8 quicksort 04
Krish_ver2
 
PPT
Quick Sort- Marge Sort.ppt
AakritiGoyal7
 
PPT
quick_sort.ppt
studentsymposium
 
PPTX
Quicksort algorithm
Bapan Maity
 
PPT
Quicksort
Rajendran
 
PPTX
Sorting techniques
JayeshGadhave1
 
PPT
Quicksort
maamir farooq
 
PPTX
Unit 5 internal sorting &amp; files
DrkhanchanaR
 
3.8 quicksort 04
Krish_ver2
 
Quick Sort- Marge Sort.ppt
AakritiGoyal7
 
quick_sort.ppt
studentsymposium
 
Quicksort algorithm
Bapan Maity
 
Quicksort
Rajendran
 
Sorting techniques
JayeshGadhave1
 
Quicksort
maamir farooq
 
Unit 5 internal sorting &amp; files
DrkhanchanaR
 

Similar to Quick & Merge Sort.ppt (20)

PPT
Merge sort and Quick sort
Maitree Patel
 
PPT
Quick sort
Rajendran
 
PPT
Array 2
Abbott
 
PPTX
Array ADT(Abstract Data Type)|Data Structure
Akash Gaur
 
PPT
Sorting
Samsil Arefin
 
PPTX
Data Structures_Searching and Sorting.pptx
RushaliDeshmukh2
 
PPTX
Arrays
Mitali Chugh
 
PPT
Data Structure Sorting
Muhazzab Chouhadry
 
PDF
Chapter 8 advanced sorting and hashing for print
Abdii Rashid
 
PPT
Insert Sort & Merge Sort Using C Programming
chandankumar364348
 
PPT
search_sort_v1.pptgghghhhggggjjjjjjllllllllvbbbbbcfdsdfffg
arpitasahad87
 
PPT
search_sort search_sortsearch_sort search_sortsearch_sortsearch_sortsearch_sort
Kanupriya731200
 
PPT
search_sort Search sortSearch sortSearch sortSearch sort
Shanmuganathan C
 
PPTX
07+08slide.pptx
MURADSANJOUM
 
PPT
Mergesort
V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women
 
PPTX
Introduction to Algorithms
pppepito86
 
PDF
Slides ads ia
Arthur Charpentier
 
PPT
Data Structure and Algorithms Arrays
ManishPrajapati78
 
PDF
Data Structures & Algorithms - Lecture 2
Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
 
PDF
IA-advanced-R
Arthur Charpentier
 
Merge sort and Quick sort
Maitree Patel
 
Quick sort
Rajendran
 
Array 2
Abbott
 
Array ADT(Abstract Data Type)|Data Structure
Akash Gaur
 
Sorting
Samsil Arefin
 
Data Structures_Searching and Sorting.pptx
RushaliDeshmukh2
 
Arrays
Mitali Chugh
 
Data Structure Sorting
Muhazzab Chouhadry
 
Chapter 8 advanced sorting and hashing for print
Abdii Rashid
 
Insert Sort & Merge Sort Using C Programming
chandankumar364348
 
search_sort_v1.pptgghghhhggggjjjjjjllllllllvbbbbbcfdsdfffg
arpitasahad87
 
search_sort search_sortsearch_sort search_sortsearch_sortsearch_sortsearch_sort
Kanupriya731200
 
search_sort Search sortSearch sortSearch sortSearch sort
Shanmuganathan C
 
07+08slide.pptx
MURADSANJOUM
 
Mergesort
V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women
 
Introduction to Algorithms
pppepito86
 
Slides ads ia
Arthur Charpentier
 
Data Structure and Algorithms Arrays
ManishPrajapati78
 
Data Structures & Algorithms - Lecture 2
Faculty of Computers and Informatics, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
 
IA-advanced-R
Arthur Charpentier
 
Ad

More from MuhammadSheraz836877 (20)

PPT
Bubble Sort.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPTX
dynamic-programming
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPTX
CHAPTER 1 BASIC sql STATEMENTS.pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPTX
Sortings .pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPT
Lecture9_StackQueue.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPT
Articles Eng.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPTX
FORMS OF MATTER.pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPTX
Bonds of solids.pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPTX
Infinitives_by_M._Sheraz.PPT
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPT
articles.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
Speakingskills. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
speakingskills. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
voice-techniques. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
body language. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
latchesandflipflops.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
listeningskills.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
listeningskills.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
listeningskills.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PPT
Business Econimics.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
PDF
latchesflip-flop DLD
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Bubble Sort.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
dynamic-programming
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
CHAPTER 1 BASIC sql STATEMENTS.pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Sortings .pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Lecture9_StackQueue.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Articles Eng.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
FORMS OF MATTER.pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Bonds of solids.pptx
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Infinitives_by_M._Sheraz.PPT
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
articles.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Speakingskills. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
speakingskills. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
voice-techniques. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
body language. Ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
latchesandflipflops.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
listeningskills.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
listeningskills.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
listeningskills.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Business Econimics.ppt
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
latchesflip-flop DLD
MuhammadSheraz836877
 
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
labyankof
 
PDF
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
Academy of Grassroots Studies and Research of India (AGRASRI)
 
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
pascualasturiaskaye4
 
PDF
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
goofy5603
 
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
shilpa939953
 
PDF
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
Raji Murugan
 
PPTX
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
shrawanbpkihs
 
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
kawisojames10
 
PDF
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
banteamlakmebratu738
 
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
sajedul2
 
PDF
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
labyankof
 
PDF
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
PPTX
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
DrMonicaSharma
 
PPTX
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
chetansingh379583
 
PDF
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
AbhishekPatil315128
 
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
DevlinaSengupta
 
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
abigailanane203
 
PDF
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
DrMONISHAphysio
 
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
DHANASHREESIVAKUMAR
 
PDF
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
wdandworks
 
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
labyankof
 
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
Academy of Grassroots Studies and Research of India (AGRASRI)
 
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
pascualasturiaskaye4
 
Pre independence Education in Inndia.pdf
goofy5603
 
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
shilpa939953
 
FourierSeries-QuestionsWithAnswers(Part-A).pdf
Raji Murugan
 
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
shrawanbpkihs
 
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
kawisojames10
 
grade 11-chemistry_fetena_net_5883.pdf teacher guide for all student
banteamlakmebratu738
 
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
sajedul2
 
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
labyankof
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ 4 KỸ NĂNG TIẾNG ANH 9 GLOBAL SUCCESS - CẢ NĂM - BÁM SÁT FORM Đ...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Renaissance Architecture: A Journey from Faith to Humanism
DrMonicaSharma
 
Introduction_to_Human_Anatomy_and_Physiology_for_B.Pharm.pptx
chetansingh379583
 
Insiders guide to clinical Medicine.pdf
AbhishekPatil315128
 
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
DevlinaSengupta
 
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
abigailanane203
 
Physiotherapy_for_Respiratory_and_Cardiac_Problems WEBBER.pdf
DrMONISHAphysio
 
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
DHANASHREESIVAKUMAR
 
Basic Mud Logging Guide for educational purpose
wdandworks
 

Quick & Merge Sort.ppt

  • 2. Sorting algorithms • Insertion, selection and bubble sort have quadratic worst-case performance • The faster comparison based algorithm ? O(nlogn) • Mergesort and Quicksort
  • 3. Merge Sort • Apply divide-and-conquer to sorting problem • Problem: Given n elements, sort elements into non-decreasing order • Divide-and-Conquer: – If n=1 terminate (every one-element list is already sorted) – If n>1, partition elements into two or more sub- collections; sort each; combine into a single sorted list • How do we partition?
  • 4. Partitioning - Choice 1 • First n-1 elements into set A, last element set B • Sort A using this partitioning scheme recursively – B already sorted • Combine A and B using method Insert() (= insertion into sorted array) • Leads to recursive version of InsertionSort() – Number of comparisons: O(n2) • Best case = n-1 • Worst case = 2 ) 1 ( 2     n n i c n i
  • 5. Partitioning - Choice 2 • Put element with largest key in B, remaining elements in A • Sort A recursively • To combine sorted A and B, append B to sorted A – Use Max() to find largest element  recursive SelectionSort() – Use bubbling process to find and move largest element to right-most position  recursive BubbleSort() • All O(n2)
  • 6. Partitioning - Choice 3 • Let’s try to achieve balanced partitioning • A gets n/2 elements, B gets rest half • Sort A and B recursively • Combine sorted A and B using a process called merge, which combines two sorted lists into one – How? We will see soon
  • 7. Example • Partition into lists of size n/2 [10, 4, 6, 3] [10, 4, 6, 3, 8, 2, 5, 7] [8, 2, 5, 7] [10, 4] [6, 3] [8, 2] [5, 7] [4] [10] [3][6] [2][8] [5][7]
  • 8. Example Cont’d • Merge [3, 4, 6, 10] [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 ] [2, 5, 7, 8] [4, 10] [3, 6] [2, 8] [5, 7] [4] [10] [3][6] [2][8] [5][7]
  • 9. Static Method mergeSort() Public static void mergeSort(Comparable []a, int left, int right) { // sort a[left:right] if (left < right) {// at least two elements int mid = (left+right)/2; //midpoint mergeSort(a, left, mid); mergeSort(a, mid + 1, right); merge(a, b, left, mid, right); //merge from a to b copy(b, a, left, right); //copy result back to a } }
  • 11. Evaluation • Recurrence equation: • Assume n is a power of 2 c1 if n=1 T(n) = 2T(n/2) + c2n if n>1, n=2k
  • 12. Solution By Substitution: T(n) = 2T(n/2) + c2n T(n/2) = 2T(n/4) + c2n/2 T(n) = 4T(n/4) + 2 c2n T(n) = 8T(n/8) + 3 c2n T(n) = 2iT(n/2i) + ic2n Assuming n = 2k, expansion halts when we get T(1) on right side; this happens when i=k T(n) = 2kT(1) + kc2n Since 2k=n, we know k=logn; since T(1) = c1, we get T(n) = c1n + c2nlogn; thus an upper bound for TmergeSort(n) is O(nlogn)
  • 13. Quicksort Algorithm Given an array of n elements (e.g., integers): • If array only contains one element, return • Else – pick one element to use as pivot. – Partition elements into two sub-arrays: • Elements less than or equal to pivot • Elements greater than pivot – Quicksort two sub-arrays – Return results
  • 14. Example We are given array of n integers to sort: 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
  • 15. Pick Pivot Element There are a number of ways to pick the pivot element. In this example, we will use the first element in the array: 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
  • 16. Partitioning Array Given a pivot, partition the elements of the array such that the resulting array consists of: 1. One sub-array that contains elements >= pivot 2. Another sub-array that contains elements < pivot The sub-arrays are stored in the original data array. Partitioning loops through, swapping elements below/above pivot.
  • 17. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 18. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index
  • 19. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index
  • 20. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index
  • 21. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index
  • 22. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index
  • 23. 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
  • 24. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
  • 25. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
  • 26. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
  • 27. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
  • 28. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
  • 29. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
  • 30. 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
  • 31. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 32. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 33. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 34. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 35. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 36. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 37. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 38. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 39. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 40. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 41. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100 pivot_index = 4 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 42. Partition Result 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] <= data[pivot] > data[pivot]
  • 43. Recursion: Quicksort Sub-arrays 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] <= data[pivot] > data[pivot]
  • 44. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time?
  • 45. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array
  • 46. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree?
  • 47. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
  • 48. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n) – Number of accesses in partition?
  • 49. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • What is best case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n) – Number of accesses in partition? O(n)
  • 50. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n)
  • 51. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time?
  • 52. Quicksort: Worst Case • Assume first element is chosen as pivot. • Assume we get array that is already in order: 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 53. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 54. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 55. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 56. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 57. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 58. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] too_big_index too_small_index
  • 59. 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot] ++too_big_index 2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot] --too_small_index 3. If too_big_index < too_small_index swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index] 4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1. 5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index] 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100 pivot_index = 0 [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] > data[pivot] <= data[pivot]
  • 60. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree?
  • 61. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
  • 62. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(n) – Number of accesses per partition?
  • 63. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time? – Recursion: 1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays: • one sub-array of size 0 • the other sub-array of size n-1 2. Quicksort each sub-array – Depth of recursion tree? O(n) – Number of accesses per partition? O(n)
  • 64. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time: O(n2)!!!
  • 65. Quicksort Analysis • Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed. • Best case running time: O(n log2n) • Worst case running time: O(n2)!!! • What can we do to avoid worst case?
  • 66. Improved Pivot Selection Pick median value of three elements from data array: data[0], data[n/2], and data[n-1]. Use this median value as pivot.
  • 67. Improving Performance of Quicksort • Improved selection of pivot. • For sub-arrays of size 3 or less, apply brute force search: – Sub-array of size 1: trivial – Sub-array of size 2: • if(data[first] > data[second]) swap them – Sub-array of size 3: left as an exercise.