SlideShare a Scribd company logo
r and k selection theory
AEM 602: Ecology of Plankton and Benthos
• Seek to explain the evolution of organism traits as adaptive
responses to environmental variation and differential mortality
or resource allocation to life (Roff 1992; Stearns 1992)
• Examine how traits are inter-correlated and constrained by
ecological factors
• Predict demographic response to disturbances at variable
spatial and temporal scales (Murphy,1968; Roff, 1988; Orzack
and Tuljapurkar, 1989)
• Invoked to predict relative influences of density-dependent
versus density-independent ecological influences on life
stages and age classes (Reznick et al. 2002)
• The most notable example is the theory of r and K-selection
(MacArthur and Wilson 1967) based on their work on island
biogeography
Life history theories
Populations grows, shrinks, or remain stable,
depending on rates of birth, death, immigration, and
emigration
Population growth curves show change in population
size over time.
Population growth
crude birth rate +
immigration rate
crude death rate+
emigration rate
–Growth rate, r =
•Exponential growth can not
continue forever
•The exponential growth of
many real populations begins to
level off as the density
approaches the carrying
capacity(K) of the environment
•Carrying capacity of a population is the maximum
density of a population that the environment can
support over a sustained period without damage to
the environment
SURVIVORSHIP CURVE
• In some environments, organisms exist
near their asymptotic density (K) for much
of the year
– These organisms are subject to K-selection
• In other habitats, the same organisms
may rarely approach the asymptotic
density but instead remain on the rising
portion of the curve for most of the year
– These organisms are subjected to r-selection
r selected species
•Unstable
environment
•High fecundity
•Small body size
•Early maturity
•Short generation
time
•Dispersed offspring
•Found in disturbed, variable or
unpredictable environment
•Productivity – high
grow rapidly
• Good colonizers
•Life span – short;
mortality – high
•Mode of life- wide range of feed
• Species that are r-selected ~ less interspecific
competition
– Hence, evolve no mechanisms for
strong competitive ability
• Algae, bacteria, rodents, annual plants,
sardine, squid, krill and most insects
  
• They reproduce and disperse rapidly when conditions are
favorable or when a disturbance opens up a new habitat
or niche for invasion, as in the early stages of ecological
succession
K selected species
•Stable environment
•Large body size
•Long life
expectency
•High parental care
•Fewer off spring
• Species – highly demanding ,
well adapted
• Productivity – since adapted- low
• Prolificity – low – long period of
sexual maturity, broods limited
• Mode of life- feed on small part of
food chain
• Population density- no of
descendents depend on
environmental potential
Species that are K-selected exist
under both intra- and
interspecific competition
Organisms are pushed to use
their resources more efficiently
late reproduction
long generation time
few offspring
e.g.Primates
Sharks
Turtle
Whale
No parental
care
Care of laid
eggs
Care of
young
What is it? No contact with
offspring after eggs
are laid
Guarding and/or
incubating eggs to
hatching
Care of young after
hatching/birth
Benefits Free to mate more
No energy
expenditure
Eggs have
protection from
predators/ harsh
conditions
High chance of
offspring survival
Drawbacks High levels of
mortality
Energy expenditure
Some mortality after
hatching
Very high levels of
energy expenditure
– may not be able to
mate for many years
after offspring birth
Examples Reef fish, frogs,
turtles
Seahorse, diamond
python, cephalopods
(eg. Octopus, squid)
Humans, primates.
Mammals (milk),
Some catfishes &
Tilapia spp.
Parental care or not?
CONTINIUM
LOGISTIC LAW
• dN/ dt = rN (K − N)
K
• If N is far below K, the growth realization factor will
be close to 1, and the population will show exponential
growth
• But as N begins to approach K, the growth realization
factor approaches zero, and the rate of population
growth drops to zero
• r and K are ends of a continuum, while
most organisms are in between
– r selection: Unpredictable environments.
– K selection: Predictable environments
r vs k
Kirk Winemuller’s (2005) triangular
model of life histories for fishes
•  Opportunistic species:
– short generation times and small body sizes
– produce lots of eggs but do not provide parental care
– thrive in environments that are dominated by 
ecological disturbance and can often be thought of as 
colonizing species
– most comparable to r-selected strategists  
– Example is a killifish
• Periodic species:
– long-lived and have large body sizes
– produce lots of eggs but don’t provide parental care
– This strategy works best when variation in juvenile survival rates 
is greater than variation in adult survival rates 
– Example is a swordfish
– In fact, this appears to be the most common life history strategy 
throughout the fish world
• Equilibrium species:
– are comparable to K-selected strategists
– fairly long-lived and vary in body size
– have few offspring, but they provide parental care to those 
offspring
– This strategy appears to be favored in environments that are 
highly density-dependent or stressful
– Examples include amblyopsids (cave fishes), cichlids, 
and syngnathids (seahorses, sea dragons, and pipefishes).
amblyopsids cichlids syngnathids
• R- selected species are characterized by small size, high growth
rate and short cell cycle and are able to increase in population
rapidly under conditions of low population density and low species
competition. These organisms are particularly prominent in
temperate lakes during the clear-water phase. During this time,
grazing pressure by herbivores is patchy and intense, and algal
growth is limited to short periods in those parts of the lake with lower
densities of zooplankton
• K-selected species, conversely, typically have large size, low growth
rate, and long cell cycles and are adapted to conditions of high
population density and high competition
r-selected and k-selected algae
r- selected algae k-selected algae
Chlamydomonas spp Aphanizomenon sp.
Chlorella pyrenoidosa Anabaena sp.
Synechoccus sp. Microsystis aeruginosa
Scenedesmus obliquus Ceratium hirundinelia
Cryptomonas erosa
• The distinguishing feature of the r- and K-selection paradigm was
the focus on density-dependent selection as the important agent of
selection on organisms’ life histories
• This paradigm was challenged as it became clear that other factors,
such as age-specific mortality, could provide a more mechanistic
causative link between an environment and an optimal life history
(Stearns 1976,1977)
• The r- and K-selection paradigm was replaced by new paradigm
that focused on age-specific mortality (Stearns, 1976; Charlesworth,
1980). This new life-history paradigm has matured into one that
uses age-structured models as a framework to incorporate many of
the themes important to the r–K paradigm
Conclusion
• Winemuller, KO. 2005. Life history strategies, population regulation,
and implications for fisheries management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat.
Sci. 62: 872-885.
• Roff, D.A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis.
Chapman and Hall, New York.
• Stearns, S.C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
• Murphy, G.I. 1968. Patterns in life history and the environment. Am.
Nat. 102: 391–403.
• Roff, D.A. 1988. The evolution of migration and some life history
parameters in marine fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 22: 133–146.
• Orzack, S.H., and Tuljapurkar, S. 1989. Population dynamics in
variable environments. VII. The demography and evolution of
iteroparity. Am. Nat. 133: 901–923.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
R AND K SELECTED SPECIES powerpoint presentation
PPTX
Population ecology
PPTX
biodiversity indices
PPTX
Carrying capacity of ecosystem
PPTX
Metapopulation
PPTX
Ecological niche
PPTX
Pteridophytes
PPTX
Ecological niche
R AND K SELECTED SPECIES powerpoint presentation
Population ecology
biodiversity indices
Carrying capacity of ecosystem
Metapopulation
Ecological niche
Pteridophytes
Ecological niche

What's hot (20)

PPTX
R and k selection.
PPTX
Alpha ,Beta ,gama diversity
PPTX
Metapopulation
PPTX
Succession
PPT
Lamarckism and neolamarkism
PPTX
Population genetics
PPTX
Ecotones
PPTX
Ecotone and edge effects & ecological succession
PPTX
Succession ,its types ,causes and theories
PPTX
Cytotaxonomy
PPTX
Evolutionary forces
PPTX
Lemarkism
PPTX
Population ecology
PPT
Ch. 5 population regulation part
PPTX
Bioindicators ppt
PPT
Phylogenetics
PDF
R and K selection in aquatic ecology
PDF
Introduction to ecology
PDF
THEORIES OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION NEO-DARWINISM.pdf
PPTX
Ecades and ecotype
R and k selection.
Alpha ,Beta ,gama diversity
Metapopulation
Succession
Lamarckism and neolamarkism
Population genetics
Ecotones
Ecotone and edge effects & ecological succession
Succession ,its types ,causes and theories
Cytotaxonomy
Evolutionary forces
Lemarkism
Population ecology
Ch. 5 population regulation part
Bioindicators ppt
Phylogenetics
R and K selection in aquatic ecology
Introduction to ecology
THEORIES OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION NEO-DARWINISM.pdf
Ecades and ecotype
Ad

Similar to r and k selection (20)

PPTX
Lecture 9: Population Ecology
PDF
r and K selection.pdf
PPT
2.1 Population Dynamics new revision slides
PDF
Principles of Ecology
PDF
Population ecology
PDF
Beyond taxonomy: A traits-based approach to fish community ecology
PPT
2 Biological Change.ppt
PDF
Characterization of Distribution of insects- Indices of Dispersion, Taylor's ...
PPTX
Chapter13 organism and population
PPT
evolution__biodiversity_ppoint.ppt
PPT
evolution__biodiversity_ppoint.ppt
PPT
Population ecologyy
PPT
Population ecologyy
PDF
Science 10 Q3 lesson 4 evolution and biodiversity origins niches and adaptati...
PPT
Ecology and Biodiversity introduction Lecture 1.ppt
PDF
Lesson 6. biodiversity
PDF
Deocareza population ecology-1231427563650176-1 (1)
PDF
Deocareza populationecology
PPTX
BSBT lecture 1.pptx
PPTX
Copy of Unit 6_7 Notes 2_Urbanization, Natural Resources, Climate Change & S...
Lecture 9: Population Ecology
r and K selection.pdf
2.1 Population Dynamics new revision slides
Principles of Ecology
Population ecology
Beyond taxonomy: A traits-based approach to fish community ecology
2 Biological Change.ppt
Characterization of Distribution of insects- Indices of Dispersion, Taylor's ...
Chapter13 organism and population
evolution__biodiversity_ppoint.ppt
evolution__biodiversity_ppoint.ppt
Population ecologyy
Population ecologyy
Science 10 Q3 lesson 4 evolution and biodiversity origins niches and adaptati...
Ecology and Biodiversity introduction Lecture 1.ppt
Lesson 6. biodiversity
Deocareza population ecology-1231427563650176-1 (1)
Deocareza populationecology
BSBT lecture 1.pptx
Copy of Unit 6_7 Notes 2_Urbanization, Natural Resources, Climate Change & S...
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
carbon footprint, emissioncontrol and carbon tax
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Plants Core Comp...
PPTX
Plant_Cell_Presentation.pptx.com learning purpose
PPTX
Disposal Of Wastes.pptx according to community medicine
PPTX
Conformity-and-Deviance module 7 ucsp grade 12
PPTX
structure and components of Environment.pptx
PDF
2-Reqerwsrhfdfsfgtdrttddjdiuiversion 2.pdf
PDF
Blue Economy Development Framework for Indonesias Economic Transformation.pdf
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Agricultural Waste Biogas Digesters Turns...
PPTX
Environmental Ethics: issues and possible solutions
PDF
Session 8a Sixth Assessment Report Findings
DOCX
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Crude Oil Large-Scale Raw Oil Containment...
PDF
PET Hydrolysis (polyethylene terepthalate Hydrolysis)
PDF
Earthquake, learn from the past and do it now.pdf
PPT
PPTPresentation3 jhsvdasvdjhavsdhsvjcksjbc.jasb..ppt
PPTX
"One Earth Celebrating World Environment Day"
PPT
Compliance Monitoring report CMR presentation.ppt
PDF
Session7 Outlines of AR7 Reports Working Group III
DOCX
D-360 ESG Series: Sustainable Hospitality Strategies for a Greener Future
PDF
Ornithology-Basic-Concepts.pdf..........
carbon footprint, emissioncontrol and carbon tax
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Anaerobic Digestion (AD) Plants Core Comp...
Plant_Cell_Presentation.pptx.com learning purpose
Disposal Of Wastes.pptx according to community medicine
Conformity-and-Deviance module 7 ucsp grade 12
structure and components of Environment.pptx
2-Reqerwsrhfdfsfgtdrttddjdiuiversion 2.pdf
Blue Economy Development Framework for Indonesias Economic Transformation.pdf
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Agricultural Waste Biogas Digesters Turns...
Environmental Ethics: issues and possible solutions
Session 8a Sixth Assessment Report Findings
Epoxy Coated Steel Bolted Tanks for Crude Oil Large-Scale Raw Oil Containment...
PET Hydrolysis (polyethylene terepthalate Hydrolysis)
Earthquake, learn from the past and do it now.pdf
PPTPresentation3 jhsvdasvdjhavsdhsvjcksjbc.jasb..ppt
"One Earth Celebrating World Environment Day"
Compliance Monitoring report CMR presentation.ppt
Session7 Outlines of AR7 Reports Working Group III
D-360 ESG Series: Sustainable Hospitality Strategies for a Greener Future
Ornithology-Basic-Concepts.pdf..........

r and k selection

  • 1. r and k selection theory AEM 602: Ecology of Plankton and Benthos
  • 2. • Seek to explain the evolution of organism traits as adaptive responses to environmental variation and differential mortality or resource allocation to life (Roff 1992; Stearns 1992) • Examine how traits are inter-correlated and constrained by ecological factors • Predict demographic response to disturbances at variable spatial and temporal scales (Murphy,1968; Roff, 1988; Orzack and Tuljapurkar, 1989) • Invoked to predict relative influences of density-dependent versus density-independent ecological influences on life stages and age classes (Reznick et al. 2002) • The most notable example is the theory of r and K-selection (MacArthur and Wilson 1967) based on their work on island biogeography Life history theories
  • 3. Populations grows, shrinks, or remain stable, depending on rates of birth, death, immigration, and emigration Population growth curves show change in population size over time. Population growth crude birth rate + immigration rate crude death rate+ emigration rate –Growth rate, r =
  • 4. •Exponential growth can not continue forever •The exponential growth of many real populations begins to level off as the density approaches the carrying capacity(K) of the environment •Carrying capacity of a population is the maximum density of a population that the environment can support over a sustained period without damage to the environment
  • 6. • In some environments, organisms exist near their asymptotic density (K) for much of the year – These organisms are subject to K-selection • In other habitats, the same organisms may rarely approach the asymptotic density but instead remain on the rising portion of the curve for most of the year – These organisms are subjected to r-selection
  • 7. r selected species •Unstable environment •High fecundity •Small body size •Early maturity •Short generation time •Dispersed offspring
  • 8. •Found in disturbed, variable or unpredictable environment •Productivity – high grow rapidly • Good colonizers •Life span – short; mortality – high •Mode of life- wide range of feed
  • 9. • Species that are r-selected ~ less interspecific competition – Hence, evolve no mechanisms for strong competitive ability • Algae, bacteria, rodents, annual plants, sardine, squid, krill and most insects    • They reproduce and disperse rapidly when conditions are favorable or when a disturbance opens up a new habitat or niche for invasion, as in the early stages of ecological succession
  • 10. K selected species •Stable environment •Large body size •Long life expectency •High parental care •Fewer off spring
  • 11. • Species – highly demanding , well adapted • Productivity – since adapted- low • Prolificity – low – long period of sexual maturity, broods limited • Mode of life- feed on small part of food chain • Population density- no of descendents depend on environmental potential
  • 12. Species that are K-selected exist under both intra- and interspecific competition Organisms are pushed to use their resources more efficiently late reproduction long generation time few offspring e.g.Primates Sharks Turtle Whale
  • 13. No parental care Care of laid eggs Care of young What is it? No contact with offspring after eggs are laid Guarding and/or incubating eggs to hatching Care of young after hatching/birth Benefits Free to mate more No energy expenditure Eggs have protection from predators/ harsh conditions High chance of offspring survival Drawbacks High levels of mortality Energy expenditure Some mortality after hatching Very high levels of energy expenditure – may not be able to mate for many years after offspring birth Examples Reef fish, frogs, turtles Seahorse, diamond python, cephalopods (eg. Octopus, squid) Humans, primates. Mammals (milk), Some catfishes & Tilapia spp. Parental care or not?
  • 15. LOGISTIC LAW • dN/ dt = rN (K − N) K • If N is far below K, the growth realization factor will be close to 1, and the population will show exponential growth • But as N begins to approach K, the growth realization factor approaches zero, and the rate of population growth drops to zero
  • 16. • r and K are ends of a continuum, while most organisms are in between – r selection: Unpredictable environments. – K selection: Predictable environments
  • 18. Kirk Winemuller’s (2005) triangular model of life histories for fishes
  • 19. •  Opportunistic species: – short generation times and small body sizes – produce lots of eggs but do not provide parental care – thrive in environments that are dominated by  ecological disturbance and can often be thought of as  colonizing species – most comparable to r-selected strategists   – Example is a killifish
  • 20. • Periodic species: – long-lived and have large body sizes – produce lots of eggs but don’t provide parental care – This strategy works best when variation in juvenile survival rates  is greater than variation in adult survival rates  – Example is a swordfish – In fact, this appears to be the most common life history strategy  throughout the fish world
  • 21. • Equilibrium species: – are comparable to K-selected strategists – fairly long-lived and vary in body size – have few offspring, but they provide parental care to those  offspring – This strategy appears to be favored in environments that are  highly density-dependent or stressful – Examples include amblyopsids (cave fishes), cichlids,  and syngnathids (seahorses, sea dragons, and pipefishes). amblyopsids cichlids syngnathids
  • 22. • R- selected species are characterized by small size, high growth rate and short cell cycle and are able to increase in population rapidly under conditions of low population density and low species competition. These organisms are particularly prominent in temperate lakes during the clear-water phase. During this time, grazing pressure by herbivores is patchy and intense, and algal growth is limited to short periods in those parts of the lake with lower densities of zooplankton • K-selected species, conversely, typically have large size, low growth rate, and long cell cycles and are adapted to conditions of high population density and high competition r-selected and k-selected algae
  • 23. r- selected algae k-selected algae Chlamydomonas spp Aphanizomenon sp. Chlorella pyrenoidosa Anabaena sp. Synechoccus sp. Microsystis aeruginosa Scenedesmus obliquus Ceratium hirundinelia Cryptomonas erosa
  • 24. • The distinguishing feature of the r- and K-selection paradigm was the focus on density-dependent selection as the important agent of selection on organisms’ life histories • This paradigm was challenged as it became clear that other factors, such as age-specific mortality, could provide a more mechanistic causative link between an environment and an optimal life history (Stearns 1976,1977) • The r- and K-selection paradigm was replaced by new paradigm that focused on age-specific mortality (Stearns, 1976; Charlesworth, 1980). This new life-history paradigm has matured into one that uses age-structured models as a framework to incorporate many of the themes important to the r–K paradigm Conclusion
  • 25. • Winemuller, KO. 2005. Life history strategies, population regulation, and implications for fisheries management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62: 872-885. • Roff, D.A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York. • Stearns, S.C. 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford. • Murphy, G.I. 1968. Patterns in life history and the environment. Am. Nat. 102: 391–403. • Roff, D.A. 1988. The evolution of migration and some life history parameters in marine fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 22: 133–146. • Orzack, S.H., and Tuljapurkar, S. 1989. Population dynamics in variable environments. VII. The demography and evolution of iteroparity. Am. Nat. 133: 901–923.