SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Reinventing Business Models in a Time of Crisis Philippe Baumard Professeur, Univ. P. Cézanne UC Berkeley, Institute of Business and Economic Research Centre de Recherche en Gestion Ecole Polytechnique 16/10/2009
Why did innovation become so critical?  Even first rank companies can be quickly outpaced A) Commoditization of generic “services bricks” Economy digitalization + High mobility of intangible assets + Rise of expertise of new entrants B) Small margins due to commoditization force companies to enter adjacent or “complementors” sectors E.g. automotive industry into financial services, telco into contents, aerospace into information security, etc. C) Customers are becoming faster learners Barriers to mobility collapse equally upstream and downstream New generations of customer have learned to “self-integrate” (Ikea, software culture, disaggregated media content consumption, etc). Don’t expect “generic answers” to work “Integrated Business Models”, Economics of functionality, etc… Building  your own  better business model is better than getting to market first
How being “first” create blind spots Seeing  our core beliefs  everywhere: Firms seek to reproduce their successes.  They create behavioral programs, buffers, and slack resources, and they focus their information gathering and communication to make them efficient.  They believe they know how to succeed in their current environments, firms attempt to block environmental changes.
Beware of repeated success! What being leader for too long does to a corporate culture People search where previous searches have succeeded Organizational learning over-samples successes and under-samples failures Over time, firms tend to emit the standardized responses even though they are dealing with unstable and changing stimuli Success plants the seeds of future failure.  lengthy periods of success foster  (a) structural and strategic inertia,  (b) extreme “process” orientations,  (c) inattention, and  (d) insularity.
Superior Learning = New Business Models Professeur Philippe Baumard CRG - Ecole Polytechnique – 16 Octobre 2009 Superior learning creates loyalty and higher yields FRONT-END : A LEARNING CUSTOMER Agir PRODUCTION : FROM GENERIC TO ADAPTIVE Enriched Information Same information Same Information Enriched Information Consumers locked-in by their lack of expertise  Personal listening (deezer.com) Google Search Personal contents (YouTube, garageband.com) Fiber Broadband (personal servers) Portals : « push » contents philosophy Channels (Yahoo) Triple-Play  Disagreggated selling of music (Apple Itunes) P2P VoIP (Skype)
A case study: The telecom industry
Locking customer through their own learning… Reward customer’s learning to increase revenues
3 key-points when “re-inventing” a business model Adopt the “rival’s perspective” Think of what you would do if you had to capture your own business Think “demand” first, and “demand innovation” second Start by analyzing customer experience, and its major faults Demand can be “innovated”, i.e. customer’s experience can be radically changed by altering very few of its attributes (ex: CDs => Itunes) Consider the customer as an active, clever, involved participant in the transformation 60% of world new revenues in the 2000 - 2007 period comes from customer’s involvement in firms’ business models That means  re-defining the customer’s experience
 
The new challenge : customer bonding Increasing value Dominant Logic Customer  lock-in Competitor lock-out Desired Proprietary Learning Product Clients Product Clients Clients Suppliers Distributors Product Clients Product Complementors Product First mover advantage Features Service Price Customer learning Customized product Collateral assets Brands Pricing structure Distribution ‘ shelf space ’ Brands Relentless innovation Patents Develop network of third party complementors to enhance products ’appeal Leverage position as market share leader in attracting complementors Customers seek products with most complementors Lock-in Adapted from Hax & Wilde, The Delta Project, 2001
New strategic roads : ecosystems competition Best Product Total customer solutions System lock-in Low cost Differentiation Redefining customer experience Horizontal breadth Customer integration Restricted access Dominant exchange Proprietary standard
Business Cases Best Product Total customer solutions System lock-in Low cost  SouthWest, Exodus Differenciation  Rolls-Royce, Google Redefining customer experience  Saturn, Disney Horizontal breadth  WalMart, Amazon, Yahoo! Customer integration  EDS, Dell Restricted access  Coca Cola, Walmart Dominant exchange eBay,Visa,  Pages Jaunes Proprietary standard  Microsoft, Intel, Cisco
The Demand Innovation Process The Origins A concept put together by Weber, Wise & Slywotzky, in “How to grow when markets don’t” (Warner Books, 2004) Most companies seek growth in expensive reorientation strategies, and they overlook the reserve for growth in their current business lines What is “Demand Innovation” The strategy that consists of re-inventing and re-shaping the demand for an existing service or product Examples:  From “PC + MP3” to “Itunes + Ipod” (US$ 890 Million sales + 100 millions Ipods sold) From “GPS + Mobile Phone + 411 in car” to “GM OnStar” (US$ 1 billion sales) From “self-publication” to “CD-BABY” (14% US market share in 2 years) What “talents” does it take? Most of the time, Demand Innovation is performed by customers themselves Putting “customers” talent at work is a challenge (i.e. Linux, Skype) Internal Talents that articulate and provoke unlearning can be trained
Where to Renew Growth? Move Stronghold Maintained or reduced scope Change d  or re-invent ed  scope Cost cutting increase control chase under-utilized capacities reduce overheads sell assets outsource! cut low value activities Economics of scope chase redundancies Eliminate unnecessary coordination Shared accountability of divisions communal use of assets D emand innovation Find critical liabilities Determine unsatisfied demand Reduce customer’s self-integration Re-focus strategy concentrate of fast growth segments simplify offers suppress « value dissipation » Value-Chain reconfiguration Moving upward or downward Developing solutions with complementors Redefining processes
A Case Study: Levi Strauss...  Coping with Diesels & Khakis Move Stronghold Maintained or reduced scope Changed or re-invented scope 2004: Levi’s “Engineered” Jeans (customer-customized ) Since 1873: “ Empathy Originality Integrity Courage” Campaign around the 501 1986: To contain the shift to casual clothing at work (khakis) 2003: Low-cost line to contain substitutes in Big Box stores Demand Innovation?
What’s Next for Garment? Critical Liabilities In competition with other “life equipment”: phones, PDAs, Blackberries Looking for the phone when it rings... Demand Innovation Garment - Communication convergence RFIDs, optic fibers that replace the rings, sensors Communicating Scarf, France Telecom R&D 2002 Communicating Fiber, France Telecom R&D 2001
Customers’ Involvement in the Demand Innovation Process Typical customer behavior: “I’ll fix it, or ignore it” Customers who fix enters a strong adoption curve They can also end up creating something better... ( http://www.wigiwigi.com/ ) ,a Skype customer Customers who ignore a liability will seek for a full solution replacement The Labs are in the streets Intel - Berkeley Research Center on RFIDs ( http://www.intel-research.net/berkeley/ ) “ Familiar Strangers” Project:  http://berkeley.intel-research.net/paulos/research/familiarstranger/ Objective: To develop “sensitive” terminals for interpersonal telecommunication, that are aware of the “familiarity” of of users’ environment What’s next? Critical Liability: My phone cannot predict if I’m going to like the incoming call (that’s why I put “special ring tones” for people I like Demand Innovation: Embedded Artificial Intelligence Profiles Incoming Calls and warns me by changing the color of my terminal (warm yellow to very cold blue...).
How Does “Demand Knowledge” becomes obsolete? Winners’ Curse In Demand Innovation, losers takes all. Develop a culture that pays attention to failing, and organize “soft places” (where people can talk freely) Too many rents Historical rents can be a curse for demand double loop learning What the telecom industry missed: VoIP, SMS (late entry), GPS+Phone, e-mail (FT’ Minitel, 1982)... Misleading business models Volume-driven, lack of  qualitative  data in performance measurement Lack of customer’s involvement Give them responsibilities and reward them
 
Focusing on demand innovation A)   Determine unsatisfied demand There is place for growth if  critical liabilities  in your current offers prevent (a) current customers to upgrade; (b) prevent new customers to be willing to try your services and products Examples : impossibility to directly transfer MP3 from PC to hi-fi; non availability of a plug-and-play ADSL for consoles; lack of essential tools in the software suite for small & medium business; excessive « self integration » preventing unskilled users to upgrade; etc. B)  Look for  unused intangible assets (i.e. “Knowledge Brokering”) Assets that customers might be willing to pay for, if they could access them Assets that are developed internally, and could be sold to customers (information, services, tools) Assets that we have historically or because we occupy a privileged space on one of the components of the value chain
How to determine  unsatisfied demand? Detecting the critical source of non-satisfaction Through focus group studies, on-line complaints, churn-motivation studies A critical liability (extremely negative attribute) generally destroys the overall perception of the quality of service (ex: long paying delays on call centers) Non-desired ‘self integration’ is a critical liability Benchmark self-integration levels with competitors Desired self-integration is a plus Bringing a new solution to a recurrent unsatisfaction of customers, by changing the rules or the way a product is consumed and used Cases: Multiplex theaters (cinema); 7/11 night opening stores; airline shuttles A terminal transaction cost can destroy a whole proposition Lack of skills of customers (learning barriers) Too heavy collateral liabilities (e.g. inefficient parental filter on ISP)
Our one and only preoccupation:  disruptive thinking ! An innovation is disruptive when it brings to the customer an experience that defy market rules and trajectories’ prediction: Either because it brings unforeseen functionality at a better cost (“Ipod’s wheel) Or, because the innovation deeply changes the competitive positions of historical incumbents, although they hold a  lesser performance  than previously dominant technologies on this market. For example, the Small Messaging System (SMS) was a disruptive technology in the mobile communication market.
No recipes… But some strategies that work   Innovation in the “services industry” Previous experience of any kind in “engineering” innovation may well be useless Ethnography, anthropology, sociology, astute social observation are more in the range of skills we need Definition of a “service” A  human  or  machine  delivery of  processes  that achieve a desire  task  or  goal  for a third party Being pampered is as much a service as being left alone Becoming knowledgeable, or having the freedom of remaining ignorant, are  both services Services can be highly cumulative (and simultaneous). It makes it difficult to create a “lock-in” environment, as competitive services can always fit in your own environment
Planning For New Business Models Be aware of classic traps Simplistic bundles do not develop new demand On the contrary, look for singulars. If you saturate the demand with quantity, you’ll end up developing “non curious” customers  Launch a « deep dive » into customers’ unsatisfaction List critical liabilities, and fix the less costly ones ASAP Assess the level of « self integration » and work with complementors to decrease customer’s complexity Each point of contact with customers is an opportunity to learn their unsatisfaction and cooperate with them (e.g. Call Centers = Demand Innovation Learning Centers) Check-out intangible assets and assess what can be done (Knowledge Brokering) Identify assets with the strongest mobility and strong attractiveness Look for buyers before moving any assets Exploit every single externalities into each intangible asset.
How to successfully  fail  in services innovation Taking for granted that people want more services The “elegant waiter” principle: Presence is deployed with discretion, only when needed, and without disturbance “Therapeutically harassing” customers does not make a better service Running after the “do all, do whatever” integrated business model People distrust exaggeratedly integrative selling propositions Integrated Operator:  “Someone who can delivers cross-segment, cross-unit, services, building on economics of scope and cross-fertilization” The rationale:  when the customer will discover that you can offer a seamless continuity of service, keeping his or her knowledge, configuration, preferences, he or she won’t bother looking for an alternative.  Forgetting the beauty of simplicity “Where is the wisdom we lost in all this knowledge, where is the knowledge we lost in all this information?” T.S. Eliot. My little getway in Carolina last week with Hertz: A GPS, “Never get lost”, a Help Line, 24/7 but a passenger seat that would not move back.
Step #1 : Re-defining the customer experience What do I sell as an insurance… broker? Consultant? Underwriter? .. Ignorant, but backed-up by a knowledgeable help Knowledgeable, and taking the risk of balancing my knowledge and risk Ignorant, and not wishing to know more Me & My Risks
Step #2 : Positioning your Business Model Ignorant, but backed-up by a knowledgeable help Knowledgeable, and taking the risk of balancing my knowledge and risk Ignorant, and not wishing to know more Me & My Risks Knowledge Broker Risk Mitigation Coach Insurance Model (financial) Assistance Model Facilities Management Teach me, and let me handle Increase my risk taking and returns Progressive Performance Models Increase my risk taking and returns
Strategy #1 : Playing with Time A business model can become disruptive when “playing with time”, i.e. take the same service and try to distort it along all possible time lines:  compressing it  (getting in and out of the service very quickly – “commoditize more than the commodities player”) triggering it  (on demand, on the spot, on occasion, on relation, etc) fragmenting and specializing it  (“there is a time for being highly safe, and a time for taking more risks, and that’s ultimately my choice”) See what would happen if you made your service “event triggered” and purely “contextual”: for example, what do I need to negotiate a credit, even on-line, when I am eligible to it?  Couldn’t I benefit from an embarked robot in my payment system that negotiate a micro spot credit line, i.e. of the price of that suit, when I am purchasing?  Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
Strategy #2:  Playing With Logic  (i.e. Reverse the Value Chain) Most services are “delivered”, and therefore, we tend to think of services as production lines, with a start, a middle and an end.  Self-integrate:  let’s the customer design and integrate the services in reverse, i.e. let’s the customer reverse-engineer and design its own insurance services, and provide him or her with all the toolbox to play with (e.g. IKEA) - Des-integrate and virtualize  :  Think about the elegant waiter: discontinuity has also a commercial value. Customers are not systematically seeking an opaque, all eventualities, all jurisdictions “service universe”. Triggering off on the go, or using discretionary possibilities can also be a source of service innovation. It’s a service itself to be able to discontinue and switch on and off a particular service. Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
Strategy #3:  Finding the Critical Liability  Critical liabilities are telling of an “unsatisfied demand” A critical liability is a feature, or “absence of feature” that prevent a customer of accomplish a desired objective of task Critical liabilities lead to innovation for several reasons: They motivate churn.  How many of us have just decided to drop a service because we were just upset by 1 single liability? People happily disengage from a whole universe of services, just because one little liability has been denied a satisfying solution. Liabilities call for creativity.  They encourage imaginative solutions because they constitute annoying bugs that challenge individual’s creativity.  They force inventors and designers to think  “empirically”,  i.e. to get their hands on the processes themselves, and talk to (unsatisfied) customers. Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
Strategy #4: DYOB Destroy Your Own Business This approach has been put together by GE, with Jack Welsh, when GE was fearing that the Internet “revolution” might be a threat to their traditional lines of business. The idea is pretty simple: practice empathy, and borrow the seat of your worst and feared enemy… and try to destroy your own business. It’s a very similar approach than the “critical liability” one, except that it is more synoptic, as you do not only focus on product or services characteristics, but also on taking over your business segment from  another industry.  What would destroy my “insurance model”? (full perfect knowledge?) Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
Strategy #5: Move the Value You can move the value generation point on the value chain, upstream, downstream, collateral, in joint-wealth exploitation, in knowledge versus risks, etc. The first step is to ask:  “where is the value?” In the fact that I can remain  ignorant  and still knowing that my ignorance will be covered by a better expertise than mine (“I am insured”), or on the contrary, in  gaining new knowledge  that reduces the need for the insurance premium, but creates a market for this immediately available knowledge? The second step, is try to move the value around until  it escapes your reach, or grab.  When it happens, you are close to a disruptive innovation.  Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
OBRIGADO MUITO! Professeur Philippe Baumard CRG - Ecole Polytechnique - 28 janvier 2008

More Related Content

PDF
Biz model 2 what drives need for change
PDF
Biz model 7 method of strategic control
PDF
Network Effects, Platforms, Standards, and Complex Systems
PPTX
Biz model 1.2 why are they important
PDF
Biz model 6 scope of activities
PDF
Finding Intranet ROI (Whitepaper)
PPT
The Digital Enterprise
 
PPTX
Celestica Presentation
Biz model 2 what drives need for change
Biz model 7 method of strategic control
Network Effects, Platforms, Standards, and Complex Systems
Biz model 1.2 why are they important
Biz model 6 scope of activities
Finding Intranet ROI (Whitepaper)
The Digital Enterprise
 
Celestica Presentation

What's hot (20)

PDF
addressing-need-based-consumerism-for-cloud-services
PDF
Digital Disruptives
PPT
GM and IT
PPTX
Birth of A Permanent Mechanism: The MinDA Act of 2010 (RA 9996)
PDF
Ibm customer experience - iab12 - milano - Ardigo
PPTX
Blackberry Scenario Analysis Presentation
PPTX
The internet economy business models and strategies slideshare
PPT
E business and the it revolution-how to benefit
PDF
The Role of Gamification and Enabling Technologies in the Future of Commerce ...
PDF
Alinea partners business_model_change
PPT
Internet + Business = E Business
PPT
e-Business part 1
PPT
2011 autumn e business models 2
PDF
Build a Mobile Strategy: Beyond BYOD
PPTX
Rim Case Study Presentation 1
DOC
e business today ing.doc
PDF
Decision Matrix: Selecting a Multichannel Cloud Contact Center Vendor
PPTX
Economic Models for Reinventing Telco - Innovation with APIs
PPT
Detecon USA Service Offering Portfolio
PDF
‘Communications & Collaboration Technologies’ as Strategic Imperative for Ent...
addressing-need-based-consumerism-for-cloud-services
Digital Disruptives
GM and IT
Birth of A Permanent Mechanism: The MinDA Act of 2010 (RA 9996)
Ibm customer experience - iab12 - milano - Ardigo
Blackberry Scenario Analysis Presentation
The internet economy business models and strategies slideshare
E business and the it revolution-how to benefit
The Role of Gamification and Enabling Technologies in the Future of Commerce ...
Alinea partners business_model_change
Internet + Business = E Business
e-Business part 1
2011 autumn e business models 2
Build a Mobile Strategy: Beyond BYOD
Rim Case Study Presentation 1
e business today ing.doc
Decision Matrix: Selecting a Multichannel Cloud Contact Center Vendor
Economic Models for Reinventing Telco - Innovation with APIs
Detecon USA Service Offering Portfolio
‘Communications & Collaboration Technologies’ as Strategic Imperative for Ent...
Ad

Similar to Reinventing Business Models In A Time Of Crisis (20)

PPTX
Backupeugene.buff
PDF
Bank digital transformation(s)
PPT
Presentation To Seda Technology Programme
PPT
Enterprise 2.0 General
PPT
Business and the Technological Environment
PDF
Conviction LP Letter - May 2024 [Redacted]
PDF
Thinking about VC themes
PDF
DAN Brand Accelerator: Client Pitch Keynote
PPTX
Growth Strategies Across the Product Lifecycle
PDF
How to Build a Digital Platform in the Age of Digital
PPTX
Class 3 Value Chain Key Resources S2023a
PPTX
Module 5 Strategic Issues of Information Technology.pptx
PDF
Strategic Management Theory and Cases An Integrated Approach 12th Edition Hil...
PDF
Unit of Value: A Framework for Scaling
PPTX
Marketing the $100 Laptop
PDF
Strategic Management An Integrated Approach 10th Edition Hill Solutions Manual
PPTX
131114_Seminar on Cloud Computing_Peer into the thougths of your customers
PPT
Chp02 Trends
PDF
Strategic Management Theory and Cases An Integrated Approach 12th Edition Hil...
PPTX
Emerging trends in Business Strategy Dr.Kabaly P Subramanian
Backupeugene.buff
Bank digital transformation(s)
Presentation To Seda Technology Programme
Enterprise 2.0 General
Business and the Technological Environment
Conviction LP Letter - May 2024 [Redacted]
Thinking about VC themes
DAN Brand Accelerator: Client Pitch Keynote
Growth Strategies Across the Product Lifecycle
How to Build a Digital Platform in the Age of Digital
Class 3 Value Chain Key Resources S2023a
Module 5 Strategic Issues of Information Technology.pptx
Strategic Management Theory and Cases An Integrated Approach 12th Edition Hil...
Unit of Value: A Framework for Scaling
Marketing the $100 Laptop
Strategic Management An Integrated Approach 10th Edition Hill Solutions Manual
131114_Seminar on Cloud Computing_Peer into the thougths of your customers
Chp02 Trends
Strategic Management Theory and Cases An Integrated Approach 12th Edition Hil...
Emerging trends in Business Strategy Dr.Kabaly P Subramanian
Ad

More from pbaumard (7)

PPT
Homage to Nonaka: A journey in knowledge and wisdom
PPT
Heidelberg Knowledge and Coopetition
PPT
1997 New Avenues In Knowledge Creation
PPT
Polytechnique CRG Innovation and failure (in French)
PPT
Tilburg Seminar May 9 2001 Iae
PPTX
Why Strategies Don\'t Matter
PPT
Copenhagen Mba On Innovation Short
Homage to Nonaka: A journey in knowledge and wisdom
Heidelberg Knowledge and Coopetition
1997 New Avenues In Knowledge Creation
Polytechnique CRG Innovation and failure (in French)
Tilburg Seminar May 9 2001 Iae
Why Strategies Don\'t Matter
Copenhagen Mba On Innovation Short

Reinventing Business Models In A Time Of Crisis

  • 1. Reinventing Business Models in a Time of Crisis Philippe Baumard Professeur, Univ. P. Cézanne UC Berkeley, Institute of Business and Economic Research Centre de Recherche en Gestion Ecole Polytechnique 16/10/2009
  • 2. Why did innovation become so critical? Even first rank companies can be quickly outpaced A) Commoditization of generic “services bricks” Economy digitalization + High mobility of intangible assets + Rise of expertise of new entrants B) Small margins due to commoditization force companies to enter adjacent or “complementors” sectors E.g. automotive industry into financial services, telco into contents, aerospace into information security, etc. C) Customers are becoming faster learners Barriers to mobility collapse equally upstream and downstream New generations of customer have learned to “self-integrate” (Ikea, software culture, disaggregated media content consumption, etc). Don’t expect “generic answers” to work “Integrated Business Models”, Economics of functionality, etc… Building your own better business model is better than getting to market first
  • 3. How being “first” create blind spots Seeing our core beliefs everywhere: Firms seek to reproduce their successes. They create behavioral programs, buffers, and slack resources, and they focus their information gathering and communication to make them efficient. They believe they know how to succeed in their current environments, firms attempt to block environmental changes.
  • 4. Beware of repeated success! What being leader for too long does to a corporate culture People search where previous searches have succeeded Organizational learning over-samples successes and under-samples failures Over time, firms tend to emit the standardized responses even though they are dealing with unstable and changing stimuli Success plants the seeds of future failure. lengthy periods of success foster (a) structural and strategic inertia, (b) extreme “process” orientations, (c) inattention, and (d) insularity.
  • 5. Superior Learning = New Business Models Professeur Philippe Baumard CRG - Ecole Polytechnique – 16 Octobre 2009 Superior learning creates loyalty and higher yields FRONT-END : A LEARNING CUSTOMER Agir PRODUCTION : FROM GENERIC TO ADAPTIVE Enriched Information Same information Same Information Enriched Information Consumers locked-in by their lack of expertise Personal listening (deezer.com) Google Search Personal contents (YouTube, garageband.com) Fiber Broadband (personal servers) Portals : « push » contents philosophy Channels (Yahoo) Triple-Play Disagreggated selling of music (Apple Itunes) P2P VoIP (Skype)
  • 6. A case study: The telecom industry
  • 7. Locking customer through their own learning… Reward customer’s learning to increase revenues
  • 8. 3 key-points when “re-inventing” a business model Adopt the “rival’s perspective” Think of what you would do if you had to capture your own business Think “demand” first, and “demand innovation” second Start by analyzing customer experience, and its major faults Demand can be “innovated”, i.e. customer’s experience can be radically changed by altering very few of its attributes (ex: CDs => Itunes) Consider the customer as an active, clever, involved participant in the transformation 60% of world new revenues in the 2000 - 2007 period comes from customer’s involvement in firms’ business models That means re-defining the customer’s experience
  • 9.  
  • 10. The new challenge : customer bonding Increasing value Dominant Logic Customer lock-in Competitor lock-out Desired Proprietary Learning Product Clients Product Clients Clients Suppliers Distributors Product Clients Product Complementors Product First mover advantage Features Service Price Customer learning Customized product Collateral assets Brands Pricing structure Distribution ‘ shelf space ’ Brands Relentless innovation Patents Develop network of third party complementors to enhance products ’appeal Leverage position as market share leader in attracting complementors Customers seek products with most complementors Lock-in Adapted from Hax & Wilde, The Delta Project, 2001
  • 11. New strategic roads : ecosystems competition Best Product Total customer solutions System lock-in Low cost Differentiation Redefining customer experience Horizontal breadth Customer integration Restricted access Dominant exchange Proprietary standard
  • 12. Business Cases Best Product Total customer solutions System lock-in Low cost SouthWest, Exodus Differenciation Rolls-Royce, Google Redefining customer experience Saturn, Disney Horizontal breadth WalMart, Amazon, Yahoo! Customer integration EDS, Dell Restricted access Coca Cola, Walmart Dominant exchange eBay,Visa, Pages Jaunes Proprietary standard Microsoft, Intel, Cisco
  • 13. The Demand Innovation Process The Origins A concept put together by Weber, Wise & Slywotzky, in “How to grow when markets don’t” (Warner Books, 2004) Most companies seek growth in expensive reorientation strategies, and they overlook the reserve for growth in their current business lines What is “Demand Innovation” The strategy that consists of re-inventing and re-shaping the demand for an existing service or product Examples: From “PC + MP3” to “Itunes + Ipod” (US$ 890 Million sales + 100 millions Ipods sold) From “GPS + Mobile Phone + 411 in car” to “GM OnStar” (US$ 1 billion sales) From “self-publication” to “CD-BABY” (14% US market share in 2 years) What “talents” does it take? Most of the time, Demand Innovation is performed by customers themselves Putting “customers” talent at work is a challenge (i.e. Linux, Skype) Internal Talents that articulate and provoke unlearning can be trained
  • 14. Where to Renew Growth? Move Stronghold Maintained or reduced scope Change d or re-invent ed scope Cost cutting increase control chase under-utilized capacities reduce overheads sell assets outsource! cut low value activities Economics of scope chase redundancies Eliminate unnecessary coordination Shared accountability of divisions communal use of assets D emand innovation Find critical liabilities Determine unsatisfied demand Reduce customer’s self-integration Re-focus strategy concentrate of fast growth segments simplify offers suppress « value dissipation » Value-Chain reconfiguration Moving upward or downward Developing solutions with complementors Redefining processes
  • 15. A Case Study: Levi Strauss... Coping with Diesels & Khakis Move Stronghold Maintained or reduced scope Changed or re-invented scope 2004: Levi’s “Engineered” Jeans (customer-customized ) Since 1873: “ Empathy Originality Integrity Courage” Campaign around the 501 1986: To contain the shift to casual clothing at work (khakis) 2003: Low-cost line to contain substitutes in Big Box stores Demand Innovation?
  • 16. What’s Next for Garment? Critical Liabilities In competition with other “life equipment”: phones, PDAs, Blackberries Looking for the phone when it rings... Demand Innovation Garment - Communication convergence RFIDs, optic fibers that replace the rings, sensors Communicating Scarf, France Telecom R&D 2002 Communicating Fiber, France Telecom R&D 2001
  • 17. Customers’ Involvement in the Demand Innovation Process Typical customer behavior: “I’ll fix it, or ignore it” Customers who fix enters a strong adoption curve They can also end up creating something better... ( http://www.wigiwigi.com/ ) ,a Skype customer Customers who ignore a liability will seek for a full solution replacement The Labs are in the streets Intel - Berkeley Research Center on RFIDs ( http://www.intel-research.net/berkeley/ ) “ Familiar Strangers” Project: http://berkeley.intel-research.net/paulos/research/familiarstranger/ Objective: To develop “sensitive” terminals for interpersonal telecommunication, that are aware of the “familiarity” of of users’ environment What’s next? Critical Liability: My phone cannot predict if I’m going to like the incoming call (that’s why I put “special ring tones” for people I like Demand Innovation: Embedded Artificial Intelligence Profiles Incoming Calls and warns me by changing the color of my terminal (warm yellow to very cold blue...).
  • 18. How Does “Demand Knowledge” becomes obsolete? Winners’ Curse In Demand Innovation, losers takes all. Develop a culture that pays attention to failing, and organize “soft places” (where people can talk freely) Too many rents Historical rents can be a curse for demand double loop learning What the telecom industry missed: VoIP, SMS (late entry), GPS+Phone, e-mail (FT’ Minitel, 1982)... Misleading business models Volume-driven, lack of qualitative data in performance measurement Lack of customer’s involvement Give them responsibilities and reward them
  • 19.  
  • 20. Focusing on demand innovation A) Determine unsatisfied demand There is place for growth if critical liabilities in your current offers prevent (a) current customers to upgrade; (b) prevent new customers to be willing to try your services and products Examples : impossibility to directly transfer MP3 from PC to hi-fi; non availability of a plug-and-play ADSL for consoles; lack of essential tools in the software suite for small & medium business; excessive « self integration » preventing unskilled users to upgrade; etc. B) Look for unused intangible assets (i.e. “Knowledge Brokering”) Assets that customers might be willing to pay for, if they could access them Assets that are developed internally, and could be sold to customers (information, services, tools) Assets that we have historically or because we occupy a privileged space on one of the components of the value chain
  • 21. How to determine unsatisfied demand? Detecting the critical source of non-satisfaction Through focus group studies, on-line complaints, churn-motivation studies A critical liability (extremely negative attribute) generally destroys the overall perception of the quality of service (ex: long paying delays on call centers) Non-desired ‘self integration’ is a critical liability Benchmark self-integration levels with competitors Desired self-integration is a plus Bringing a new solution to a recurrent unsatisfaction of customers, by changing the rules or the way a product is consumed and used Cases: Multiplex theaters (cinema); 7/11 night opening stores; airline shuttles A terminal transaction cost can destroy a whole proposition Lack of skills of customers (learning barriers) Too heavy collateral liabilities (e.g. inefficient parental filter on ISP)
  • 22. Our one and only preoccupation: disruptive thinking ! An innovation is disruptive when it brings to the customer an experience that defy market rules and trajectories’ prediction: Either because it brings unforeseen functionality at a better cost (“Ipod’s wheel) Or, because the innovation deeply changes the competitive positions of historical incumbents, although they hold a lesser performance than previously dominant technologies on this market. For example, the Small Messaging System (SMS) was a disruptive technology in the mobile communication market.
  • 23. No recipes… But some strategies that work Innovation in the “services industry” Previous experience of any kind in “engineering” innovation may well be useless Ethnography, anthropology, sociology, astute social observation are more in the range of skills we need Definition of a “service” A human or machine delivery of processes that achieve a desire task or goal for a third party Being pampered is as much a service as being left alone Becoming knowledgeable, or having the freedom of remaining ignorant, are both services Services can be highly cumulative (and simultaneous). It makes it difficult to create a “lock-in” environment, as competitive services can always fit in your own environment
  • 24. Planning For New Business Models Be aware of classic traps Simplistic bundles do not develop new demand On the contrary, look for singulars. If you saturate the demand with quantity, you’ll end up developing “non curious” customers Launch a « deep dive » into customers’ unsatisfaction List critical liabilities, and fix the less costly ones ASAP Assess the level of « self integration » and work with complementors to decrease customer’s complexity Each point of contact with customers is an opportunity to learn their unsatisfaction and cooperate with them (e.g. Call Centers = Demand Innovation Learning Centers) Check-out intangible assets and assess what can be done (Knowledge Brokering) Identify assets with the strongest mobility and strong attractiveness Look for buyers before moving any assets Exploit every single externalities into each intangible asset.
  • 25. How to successfully fail in services innovation Taking for granted that people want more services The “elegant waiter” principle: Presence is deployed with discretion, only when needed, and without disturbance “Therapeutically harassing” customers does not make a better service Running after the “do all, do whatever” integrated business model People distrust exaggeratedly integrative selling propositions Integrated Operator: “Someone who can delivers cross-segment, cross-unit, services, building on economics of scope and cross-fertilization” The rationale: when the customer will discover that you can offer a seamless continuity of service, keeping his or her knowledge, configuration, preferences, he or she won’t bother looking for an alternative. Forgetting the beauty of simplicity “Where is the wisdom we lost in all this knowledge, where is the knowledge we lost in all this information?” T.S. Eliot. My little getway in Carolina last week with Hertz: A GPS, “Never get lost”, a Help Line, 24/7 but a passenger seat that would not move back.
  • 26. Step #1 : Re-defining the customer experience What do I sell as an insurance… broker? Consultant? Underwriter? .. Ignorant, but backed-up by a knowledgeable help Knowledgeable, and taking the risk of balancing my knowledge and risk Ignorant, and not wishing to know more Me & My Risks
  • 27. Step #2 : Positioning your Business Model Ignorant, but backed-up by a knowledgeable help Knowledgeable, and taking the risk of balancing my knowledge and risk Ignorant, and not wishing to know more Me & My Risks Knowledge Broker Risk Mitigation Coach Insurance Model (financial) Assistance Model Facilities Management Teach me, and let me handle Increase my risk taking and returns Progressive Performance Models Increase my risk taking and returns
  • 28. Strategy #1 : Playing with Time A business model can become disruptive when “playing with time”, i.e. take the same service and try to distort it along all possible time lines: compressing it (getting in and out of the service very quickly – “commoditize more than the commodities player”) triggering it (on demand, on the spot, on occasion, on relation, etc) fragmenting and specializing it (“there is a time for being highly safe, and a time for taking more risks, and that’s ultimately my choice”) See what would happen if you made your service “event triggered” and purely “contextual”: for example, what do I need to negotiate a credit, even on-line, when I am eligible to it? Couldn’t I benefit from an embarked robot in my payment system that negotiate a micro spot credit line, i.e. of the price of that suit, when I am purchasing? Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
  • 29. Strategy #2: Playing With Logic (i.e. Reverse the Value Chain) Most services are “delivered”, and therefore, we tend to think of services as production lines, with a start, a middle and an end. Self-integrate: let’s the customer design and integrate the services in reverse, i.e. let’s the customer reverse-engineer and design its own insurance services, and provide him or her with all the toolbox to play with (e.g. IKEA) - Des-integrate and virtualize : Think about the elegant waiter: discontinuity has also a commercial value. Customers are not systematically seeking an opaque, all eventualities, all jurisdictions “service universe”. Triggering off on the go, or using discretionary possibilities can also be a source of service innovation. It’s a service itself to be able to discontinue and switch on and off a particular service. Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
  • 30. Strategy #3: Finding the Critical Liability Critical liabilities are telling of an “unsatisfied demand” A critical liability is a feature, or “absence of feature” that prevent a customer of accomplish a desired objective of task Critical liabilities lead to innovation for several reasons: They motivate churn. How many of us have just decided to drop a service because we were just upset by 1 single liability? People happily disengage from a whole universe of services, just because one little liability has been denied a satisfying solution. Liabilities call for creativity. They encourage imaginative solutions because they constitute annoying bugs that challenge individual’s creativity. They force inventors and designers to think “empirically”, i.e. to get their hands on the processes themselves, and talk to (unsatisfied) customers. Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
  • 31. Strategy #4: DYOB Destroy Your Own Business This approach has been put together by GE, with Jack Welsh, when GE was fearing that the Internet “revolution” might be a threat to their traditional lines of business. The idea is pretty simple: practice empathy, and borrow the seat of your worst and feared enemy… and try to destroy your own business. It’s a very similar approach than the “critical liability” one, except that it is more synoptic, as you do not only focus on product or services characteristics, but also on taking over your business segment from another industry. What would destroy my “insurance model”? (full perfect knowledge?) Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
  • 32. Strategy #5: Move the Value You can move the value generation point on the value chain, upstream, downstream, collateral, in joint-wealth exploitation, in knowledge versus risks, etc. The first step is to ask: “where is the value?” In the fact that I can remain ignorant and still knowing that my ignorance will be covered by a better expertise than mine (“I am insured”), or on the contrary, in gaining new knowledge that reduces the need for the insurance premium, but creates a market for this immediately available knowledge? The second step, is try to move the value around until it escapes your reach, or grab. When it happens, you are close to a disruptive innovation. Five Strategies to Innovate in Services
  • 33. OBRIGADO MUITO! Professeur Philippe Baumard CRG - Ecole Polytechnique - 28 janvier 2008