SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Can People Segregate Sounds in
Two Different Rooms?
Brianna Weibye
University of Minnesota
Are We Sensitive to Room Acoustics?
• Use room acoustics to detect
reverberance
 We are sensitive to room acoustics and
use information to organized auditory
objects in distance.
• Segregating the direct portion, not the
reverberation tails (stays the same).
 Gives information about global
environment.
• Evidence of segregation of two objects
based on tail of temporal envelope.
 Can be done if one of the objects has no
tail (target or masker).
TIME
INTENSITY
Direct
Early Reflections
Reverberation
TIME
INTENSITY
Direct
Early Reflections
Reverberation
Reverberation time (T60) = Time (in sec) for the intensity
to decrease by 60 dB (a factor of 1,000,000).
Overview: Introduction
Goal: Can people segregate sounds in two different rooms?
Overall Concepts:
Used two tasks --
1) Detection – Can subjects detect which rhythm is more
reverberant?
- Used detection thresholds to see how sensitive our subjects were
and how they can compare reverberant stimuli.
2) Discrimination – Can subjects segregate the rhythms
from the maskers?
- Can subjects discriminate objects over time using room acoustic cues?
Virtual Room Model
How good are people detecting room acoustics
based on t60?
• Model we used based on Zahorik, 2009.
 How virtual environments are made?
1) Image models used for early reflections.
 This gets early portions and impulse responses.
 In our case 500 reflections are simulated
 First 500 reflections are spatialized, they sound like
they’re coming from somewhere in space.
 After 500 it decays and becomes just noise.
2) Statistical Model simulates late reverberation
models.
 Based on Sabine equation: relates volume of room to
how quickly it decays.
 Based on absorption and reflection surfaces
• From this, we can now create a virtual room
using headphones.
• Important: We did not change the dimensions
of the room only energy absorbed. Timing of
early reflections are exactly the same.
Methods of Detection Task
 White Noise Burst at 50ms
 Convolved this noise with impulse
response (“Putting it in the room”) .
 Remove leveling as a que by level roving
( +/- 6dB).
 Tracking is 3 down-1 up adaptive track
 Step Sizes: (1000ms, 500ms, 60ms, 10ms)
 Steps decrease with downward reversal
• 400ms  quiet office
• 1000ms  auditorium
Results of Detection Task
 More variability in 1000ms case than 400ms
 Mean data significantly different from the reference.
 400ms  Mean Threshold: 1000ms
 1000ms  Mean Threshold: 2200ms
 “Just Noticeable Differences” were about the same (between 1.25-1.5)
Methods of Discrimination Task
 Same 50ms noise bursts.
 4 repetitions of a rhythm (each trial is about
11 seconds).
 Practiced target rhythm only conditions until
they reached 90% with no masker, usually
took two or more tries.
 Practice in beginning of each trial before
actual measurement.
 Random masker placements; each trial had
random rhythm, and then asked which
rhythm they heard.
 Parametrically varied masker t60, using two
target references (400ms, 1000ms)
 3 Conditions: 1) Monaural 2) Binaural 3)
Binaural 90 degree
** Expected binaural 90 degree to be better
based on acoustic head shadow providing a
better ear advantage for reverberant listening.
Performance on the rhythm task is an
objective measure of segregation.
Results (400ms Reference)
• Average mean across all subjects
• Each condition represented by
different color (monaural, binaural,
binaural 90 degrees)
• The target (grey) stayed the same.
 We changed the masker (duration)
Results (1000ms Reference)
• Detection was off the measurements
we tested
• Similar results to the 400ms
Reference
Conclusions
• People can segregate anechoic from a reverberant environment but cannot
discriminate the influence of two differing reverberant environments on
auditory objects.
• Most everyday environments are between 400ms (e.g small office) and
1000ms (e.g auditorium), so we are exposed to these types of environments
all the time.
• We can at best detect the difference in reverberance between a small office
and an auditorium, however, we cannot use this information to discriminate
which objects are in which room.
• The brain might have difficulty tracking more than one environment at one
time.
 Which makes sense because you’re only in one room at once.

More Related Content

PPT
Contrast
PDF
Summer Research 2016_EVIL
PPTX
Quality of radiograph by dr ashok
PPT
HIS 240 - Dir Mics and Dig Noise Reduction 2011
PPTX
Radiographic factor
PPTX
Kishore rad ex contol
PPTX
factor affecting quality of radiograph
PDF
FUNDAMENTAL ACOUSTICS AND WIND TURBINE NOISE ISSUES
Contrast
Summer Research 2016_EVIL
Quality of radiograph by dr ashok
HIS 240 - Dir Mics and Dig Noise Reduction 2011
Radiographic factor
Kishore rad ex contol
factor affecting quality of radiograph
FUNDAMENTAL ACOUSTICS AND WIND TURBINE NOISE ISSUES

What's hot (20)

PDF
Cavity-enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy for Trace Gas Detection with Frontier
PDF
Ds3 fiche produit
PPTX
E media seminar 20_12_2017_artificial_reverberation
PDF
Laser tutorial 3 december 11, 2012
PPT
Learning object
KEY
IB Physics Resolution flippingphysics by Nothingnerdy
PPTX
PPTX
Multizone reproduction of speech soundfields a perceptually weighted approac...
PPTX
Factors controlling the beam of x-ray
PPTX
Ftir infra 3000 presentation
PDF
Silencers panels-engineering-guide
PPTX
Analytical instruments introduction
PPTX
3D Spatial Response
DOC
Assignment applied hydrology
PPTX
Spectrophotometry
PDF
1 reflection refraction
PPT
Laser dental hard tissue interaction with possible applications (2)
PPTX
Radiation types, units, protection
Cavity-enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy for Trace Gas Detection with Frontier
Ds3 fiche produit
E media seminar 20_12_2017_artificial_reverberation
Laser tutorial 3 december 11, 2012
Learning object
IB Physics Resolution flippingphysics by Nothingnerdy
Multizone reproduction of speech soundfields a perceptually weighted approac...
Factors controlling the beam of x-ray
Ftir infra 3000 presentation
Silencers panels-engineering-guide
Analytical instruments introduction
3D Spatial Response
Assignment applied hydrology
Spectrophotometry
1 reflection refraction
Laser dental hard tissue interaction with possible applications (2)
Radiation types, units, protection
Ad

Viewers also liked (11)

PDF
Panduan login ms outlook
PDF
Hogar para ni os con cancer popplet
PPTX
Demokratisering
PDF
Economic Contribution of Women in Self Help Groups: Village Level Evidence fr...
PPTX
201608 maio media guide
PDF
Erasmus plus happens senior age 8 12 survey
DOCX
Cooking recipe Welshcakes
PDF
VMware vRealize Network Insight Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
PPSX
Propuestas para la participación de los padres en la Escuela
PDF
Επαναληπτικές Ασκήσεις Μαθηματικών Γ΄ τάξη, 4η Ενότητα: Κεφ. 22-26
DOCX
Επαναληπτικές Ασκήσεις Γλώσσας, Γ' τάξη, 7η Ενότητα: Ιστορίες του χειμώνα
Panduan login ms outlook
Hogar para ni os con cancer popplet
Demokratisering
Economic Contribution of Women in Self Help Groups: Village Level Evidence fr...
201608 maio media guide
Erasmus plus happens senior age 8 12 survey
Cooking recipe Welshcakes
VMware vRealize Network Insight Frequently Asked Questions FAQ
Propuestas para la participación de los padres en la Escuela
Επαναληπτικές Ασκήσεις Μαθηματικών Γ΄ τάξη, 4η Ενότητα: Κεφ. 22-26
Επαναληπτικές Ασκήσεις Γλώσσας, Γ' τάξη, 7η Ενότητα: Ιστορίες του χειμώνα
Ad

Similar to ResearchLabPresentation (20)

PDF
A review article on the natural fibrous based sound absorbing acoustic materials
PPTX
Us physics (4)
PPT
sound basic & microphone
DOCX
Noise monitoring
PPTX
Primer on reverberation
PPTX
Psychoacoustics & Noise criteria
PDF
An Introduction to Audio Principles
PPTX
Octave band.pptx
PPTX
Ultrasound physics
PPTX
The Recording Environment part 1
PPTX
Seminar phy of middle ear
PDF
Ultrasound Imaging_2023.pdf
PPTX
audiology.pptx
PPTX
Principles of Ultrasound Physics.pptx
PPTX
REVERBERATION, NOISE, ULTRASONIC WAVES.pptx
PPTX
Building services acoustics and lighting
PPTX
Lecture 3 b psychoacoustics of discriminating and identifying sounds
PPTX
DIALYSIS AND ULTRASOUND TECHNOLOGY CH4.pptx
PDF
unit 4.pdf
PDF
A review article on the natural fibrous based sound absorbing acoustic materials
Us physics (4)
sound basic & microphone
Noise monitoring
Primer on reverberation
Psychoacoustics & Noise criteria
An Introduction to Audio Principles
Octave band.pptx
Ultrasound physics
The Recording Environment part 1
Seminar phy of middle ear
Ultrasound Imaging_2023.pdf
audiology.pptx
Principles of Ultrasound Physics.pptx
REVERBERATION, NOISE, ULTRASONIC WAVES.pptx
Building services acoustics and lighting
Lecture 3 b psychoacoustics of discriminating and identifying sounds
DIALYSIS AND ULTRASOUND TECHNOLOGY CH4.pptx
unit 4.pdf

ResearchLabPresentation

  • 1. Can People Segregate Sounds in Two Different Rooms? Brianna Weibye University of Minnesota
  • 2. Are We Sensitive to Room Acoustics? • Use room acoustics to detect reverberance  We are sensitive to room acoustics and use information to organized auditory objects in distance. • Segregating the direct portion, not the reverberation tails (stays the same).  Gives information about global environment. • Evidence of segregation of two objects based on tail of temporal envelope.  Can be done if one of the objects has no tail (target or masker). TIME INTENSITY Direct Early Reflections Reverberation TIME INTENSITY Direct Early Reflections Reverberation Reverberation time (T60) = Time (in sec) for the intensity to decrease by 60 dB (a factor of 1,000,000).
  • 3. Overview: Introduction Goal: Can people segregate sounds in two different rooms? Overall Concepts: Used two tasks -- 1) Detection – Can subjects detect which rhythm is more reverberant? - Used detection thresholds to see how sensitive our subjects were and how they can compare reverberant stimuli. 2) Discrimination – Can subjects segregate the rhythms from the maskers? - Can subjects discriminate objects over time using room acoustic cues?
  • 4. Virtual Room Model How good are people detecting room acoustics based on t60? • Model we used based on Zahorik, 2009.  How virtual environments are made? 1) Image models used for early reflections.  This gets early portions and impulse responses.  In our case 500 reflections are simulated  First 500 reflections are spatialized, they sound like they’re coming from somewhere in space.  After 500 it decays and becomes just noise. 2) Statistical Model simulates late reverberation models.  Based on Sabine equation: relates volume of room to how quickly it decays.  Based on absorption and reflection surfaces • From this, we can now create a virtual room using headphones. • Important: We did not change the dimensions of the room only energy absorbed. Timing of early reflections are exactly the same.
  • 5. Methods of Detection Task  White Noise Burst at 50ms  Convolved this noise with impulse response (“Putting it in the room”) .  Remove leveling as a que by level roving ( +/- 6dB).  Tracking is 3 down-1 up adaptive track  Step Sizes: (1000ms, 500ms, 60ms, 10ms)  Steps decrease with downward reversal • 400ms  quiet office • 1000ms  auditorium
  • 6. Results of Detection Task  More variability in 1000ms case than 400ms  Mean data significantly different from the reference.  400ms  Mean Threshold: 1000ms  1000ms  Mean Threshold: 2200ms  “Just Noticeable Differences” were about the same (between 1.25-1.5)
  • 7. Methods of Discrimination Task  Same 50ms noise bursts.  4 repetitions of a rhythm (each trial is about 11 seconds).  Practiced target rhythm only conditions until they reached 90% with no masker, usually took two or more tries.  Practice in beginning of each trial before actual measurement.  Random masker placements; each trial had random rhythm, and then asked which rhythm they heard.  Parametrically varied masker t60, using two target references (400ms, 1000ms)  3 Conditions: 1) Monaural 2) Binaural 3) Binaural 90 degree ** Expected binaural 90 degree to be better based on acoustic head shadow providing a better ear advantage for reverberant listening. Performance on the rhythm task is an objective measure of segregation.
  • 8. Results (400ms Reference) • Average mean across all subjects • Each condition represented by different color (monaural, binaural, binaural 90 degrees) • The target (grey) stayed the same.  We changed the masker (duration)
  • 9. Results (1000ms Reference) • Detection was off the measurements we tested • Similar results to the 400ms Reference
  • 10. Conclusions • People can segregate anechoic from a reverberant environment but cannot discriminate the influence of two differing reverberant environments on auditory objects. • Most everyday environments are between 400ms (e.g small office) and 1000ms (e.g auditorium), so we are exposed to these types of environments all the time. • We can at best detect the difference in reverberance between a small office and an auditorium, however, we cannot use this information to discriminate which objects are in which room. • The brain might have difficulty tracking more than one environment at one time.  Which makes sense because you’re only in one room at once.