3. Chapter Objectives
• To describe the exchange rate
systems used by various governments.
• To explain how governments can use
direct and indirect intervention to influence
exchange rates.
• To explain how government intervention in
the foreign exchange market can affect
economic conditions.
4. Exchange Rate Systems
• Exchange rate systems can be
classified according to the degree to
which the rates are controlled by the
government:
– fixed
– freely floating
– managed float
– pegged.
5. Fixed Exchange Rate
System
System: Rates are held constant or allowed to
fluctuate within very narrow bands only.
Examples: Bretton Woods era (1944–1971),
Smithsonian Agreement (1971)
MNCs know the future exchange rates.
Governments can revalue their currencies.
Each country is also vulnerable to the
economic conditions in other countries.
6. Freely Floating Exchange
Rate System (1)
System: Rates are determined by market
forces without governmental intervention.
Each country is more insulated from the
economic problems of other countries.
Central bank interventions just to control
exchange rates are not needed.
Governments are not constrained by the
need to maintain exchange rates when
setting new policies.
7. Freely Floating Exchange
Rate System (2)
Less capital flow restrictions are needed,
thus enhancing market efficiency.
MNCs may need to devote substantial
resources to managing their exposure to
exchange rate fluctuations.
The country that initially experienced
economic problems (such as high inflation,
increased unemployment) may have its
problems compounded.
8. Managed Float Exchange
Rate System
System: Exchange rates are allowed to
move freely on a daily basis and no official
boundaries exist. However, governments
may intervene to prevent the rates from
moving too much in a certain direction.
A government may manipulate its
exchange rates such that its own country
benefits at the expense of other countries.
9. Pegged Exchange Rate
System
System: The currency’s value is pegged to a
foreign currency or to some unit of account,
and thus moves in line with that currency or
unit against other currencies.
Examples: European Economic
Community’s snake arrangement (1972),
European Monetary System’s exchange rate
mechanism (1979), Mexican peso’s peg to
the U.S. dollar (1994).
10. Currency Boards
• A currency board is a system for pegging
the value of the local currency to some
other specified currency.
Examples: HK$7.80 = US$1 (since 1983),
8.75 El Salvador colons = US$1 (2000)
A board can stabilize a currency’s value.
It is effective only if investors believe that
it will last.
11. Currency Boards
Local interest rates must be aligned with
the interest rates of the currency to which
the local currency is tied.
Note: The local rates may include a risk
premium.
A currency that is pegged to another
currency will have to move in tandem with
that currency against all other currencies.
12. Dollarization
• Dollarization refers to the replacement of a
country’s currency with U.S. dollars.
• Dollarization goes beyond a currency
board, as the country no longer has a local
currency.
• For example, Ecuador implemented
dollarization in 2000.
13. Exchange Rate Arrangements
Pegged Rate System
Bahamas Bermuda Hong Kong
Barbados Saudi Arabia
Pegged to
U.S. dollar
Floating Rate System
Afghanistan Hungary Paraguay Sweden
Argentina India Peru Switzerland
Australia Indonesia Poland Taiwan
Bolivia Israel Romania Thailand
Brazil Jamaica Russia United Kingdom
Canada Japan Singapore Venezuela
Chile Mexico South Africa
Euro countries Norway South Korea
China pegged to a weighted basket of currencies
14. A Single European Currency (1)
• The 1991 Maastricht treaty called for a single
European currency—the euro.
• By June 2002, the national currencies of 12
European countries* had been withdrawn and
replaced with the euro.
* Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal,
Spain
• Since then, more European countries have adopted
or are planning to adopt the euro.
15. A Single European Currency (2)
• The Frankfurt-based European Central
Bank is responsible for setting European
monetary policy, which is now
consolidated because of the single
money supply.
• Each participating country can still rely
on its own fiscal policy (tax and
government expenditure decisions) to
help solve its local economic problems.
16. A Single European Currency (3)
• Within the euro zone, there is neither
exchange rate risk nor foreign exchange
transaction cost.
• This means more comparable product
pricing, and encourages more cross-
border trade and capital flows.
• It will also be easier to conduct and
compare valuations of firms across the
participating European countries.
17. A Single European Currency (4)
• The interest rates offered on government
securities will have to be similar across
the participating European countries.
• Stock and bond prices will also be more
comparable and there should be more
cross-border investing.
• However, non-European investors may
not achieve as much diversification as in
the past.
18. Government Intervention (1)
• Each country has a central bank that may
intervene in the foreign exchange market to
control its currency’s value.
• A central bank may also attempt to control the
money supply growth in its country.
• In the U.S., the Federal Reserve System (Fed)
is the central bank. In Europe, the ECB
European Central Bank.
19. Government Intervention (2)
• Central banks manage exchange rates
– to smooth exchange rate movements,
– to establish implicit exchange rate
boundaries, and
– to respond to temporary disturbances.
• Often, intervention is overwhelmed by market
forces. However, currency movements may be
even more volatile in the absence of
intervention.
20. Government Intervention (3)
• Direct intervention refers to the exchange
of currencies that the central bank holds
as reserves for other currencies in the
foreign exchange market.
• Direct intervention is usually most
effective when there is a coordinated
effort among central banks and when the
central banks have high levels of
reserves that they can use.
21. D2
Quantity of £
S1
D1
Value
of £
V1
V2
BoE buys £’s with
reserves of FC
to strengthen the £
S2
BoE sells £’s for FC
to weaken the £
V2
Quantity of £
D1
Value
of £
V1
S1
Effects of Bank of England (BoE)
Intervention in the Foreign Exchange
Market
22. Government Intervention (4)
• When a central bank intervenes in the
foreign exchange market without adjusting
for the change in money supply, it is said to
engage in nonsterilized intervention.
• In a sterilized intervention, the central bank
simultaneously engages in offsetting
transactions in the Treasury securities
markets to maintain the money supply.
23. Bank of England
Banks participating
in the foreign
exchange market
£ FC deposits
To weaken
the £
£
Bank of England
Banks participating
in the foreign
exchange market
FC reserves
To
strengthen
the £:
BoE
ensures net
repayment
of Treasury
securities
£
T-securities
BoE
ensures net
issues of
Treasury
securities
£
T-securities
Nonsterilized v. Sterilized Intervention
Nonsterilized Sterilized
24. Government Intervention (5)
• Some speculators attempt to determine
when the central bank is intervening
directly, and the extent of the intervention,
in order to capitalize on the anticipated
results of the intervention effort.
• Central banks can also engage in indirect
intervention by influencing the factors* that
determine the value of a currency.
* Inflation, interest rates, income level,
government controls, expectations
25. Government Intervention (6)
• For example, the Fed may attempt to
increase interest rates (and hence boost
the dollar’s value) by reducing the U.S.
money supply.
• Some governments have also used
foreign exchange controls (such as
restrictions on currency exchange) as a
form of indirect intervention.
26. Exchange Rate Target Zones
• Target zones have been suggested for
reducing exchange rate volatility.
• An initial exchange rate will be established
with specific boundaries. Ideally, the rates
will be able to adjust to economic factors
without causing fear in financial markets
and wide swings in international trade.
• The actual result may be a system no
different from that which exists today.
27. Intervention as a Policy Tool (1)
• Like tax laws and the money supply, the
exchange rate is a tool that a
government can use to achieve its
desired economic objectives.
• A weak home currency can stimulate
foreign demand for products, and hence
reduce unemployment at home.
However, it can also lead to higher
inflation.
28. Intervention as a Policy Tool (2)
• A strong currency may cure high
inflation, since it intensifies foreign
competition and forces domestic
producers to refrain from increasing
prices. However, it may also lead to
higher unemployment.
29. Impact of Government Actions on Exchange Rates
Government Intervention
in
Foreign Exchange Market
Government
Monetary
and Fiscal Policies
Relative Interest
Rates
Relative Inflation
Rates
Relative National
Income Levels
International
Capital Flows
Exchange Rates
International
Trade
Tax Laws,
etc.
Quotas,
Tariffs, etc.
Government
Purchases & Sales
of Currencies