ROAD AGGREGATES 01
PAVEMENT MATERIALSPAVEMENT MATERIALS
ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
(CE-862)(CE-862)
Lec-10
Fall Semester 2016
 
Dr. Arshad Hussain
arshad_nit@yahoo.com , Office Room#111, Tel: 05190854163,
Cell: 03419756251
National Institute of Transportation (NIT)
School of Civil & Environmental Engineering (SCEE)
National University of Science and Technology (NUST)
NUST Campus, Sector H-12, Islamabad
ROAD AGGREGATESROAD AGGREGATES (Cont..)(Cont..)
AGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATIONAGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATION
Aggregate Physical Properties
Maximum Aggregate Size
Gradation
Other Aggregate Properties
 Toughness and Abrasion Resistance
 Specific Gravity
 Particle Shape and Surface Texture
 Durability and Soundness
 Cleanliness and Deleterious Materials
AGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATIONAGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATION
Maximum Aggregate Size
Maximum size
The smallest sieve through which 100 percent of the
aggregate particles pass.
Nominal maximum size
The largest sieve that retains some of the aggregate
particles but generally not more than 10 percent by
weight. 
Aggregate Size DefinitionsAggregate Size Definitions
Nominal Maximum
Aggregate Size
◦ one size larger than the first
sieve to retain more than 10%
Maximum Aggregate Size
◦ one size larger than nominal
maximum size
100100
100100
9090
7272
6565
4848
3636
2222
1515
99
44
100100
9999
8989
7272
6565
4848
3636
2222
1515
99
44
AGGREGATE GRADATIONAGGREGATE GRADATION
 Use 0.45 Power Gradation
Chart
 Blend Size Definitions
◦ maximum size
◦ nominal maximum size
Gradation Limits
◦ control points
◦ restricted zone
Example:Example:
4.75 mm sieve plots at (4.75)4.75 mm sieve plots at (4.75)0.450.45
= 2.02= 2.02
Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
100100
00 11 22 33 44
Percent PassingPercent Passing
0.45 Power Grading Chart0.45 Power Grading Chart
0.45 Power Grading Chart0.45 Power Grading Chart
0 .075 .3 .6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.00 .075 .3 .6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0
Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power
00
2020
4040
6060
8080
100100
maximum density linemaximum density line
Percent PassingPercent Passing
maxmax
sizesize
Aggregate Gradation
0.45 POWER CURVES
Calculation of the Max Density CurveCalculation of the Max Density Curve
n
D
d
P 





=
where P = % finer than the sieve
d = aggregate size being considered
D = maximum aggregate size being used
n = parameter which equals 0.45—represents the
maximum particle packing
100100
00
.075.075 .3.3 2.362.36 4.754.75 9.59.5 12.5 19.012.5 19.0
Percent PassingPercent Passing
control pointcontrol point
restricted zonerestricted zone
max density linemax density line
maxmax
sizesize
nomnom
maxmax
sizesize
Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power
Superpave Aggregate GradationSuperpave Aggregate Gradation
100100
00
.075.075 .3.3 2.362.36 12.512.5 19.019.0
Percent PassingPercent Passing
Design Aggregate StructureDesign Aggregate Structure
Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power
Superpave Mix Size DesignationsSuperpave Mix Size Designations
SuperpaveSuperpave Nom Max SizeNom Max Size Max SizeMax Size
DesignationDesignation (mm)(mm) (mm)(mm)
37.5 mm37.5 mm 37.537.5 5050
25 mm25 mm 2525 37.537.5
19 mm19 mm 1919 2525
12.5 mm12.5 mm 12.512.5 1919
9.5 mm9.5 mm 9.59.5 12.512.5
GRADATIONS
* Considerations:
- Max. size < 1/2 AC lift thickness
- Larger max size
+ Increases strength
+ Improves skid resistance
+ Increases volume and surface area of agg
which decreases required AC content
+ Improves rut resistance
+ Increases problem with segregation of particles
- Smaller max size
+ Reduces segregation
+ Reduces road noise
+ Decreases tire wear
TARGET GRADATIONTARGET GRADATION
Acceptable gradation band specified
Mix design selects a job mix formula (JMF) which
falls within band and meets design criteria
Superpave
◦ 5 nominal sizes (37.5, 25, 19, 12.5, and 9.5 mm)
◦ Four sieve sizes used to set upper and lower limits
◦ Staying out of the restricted zone in suggested to
minimize problems with natural sands
BLENDING STOCKPILESBLENDING STOCKPILES
Basic formula for combining stockpiles to
achieve a target gradation is:
p = Aa + Bb + Cc + ….
where:
p = percent of material passing given sieve size
A, B, C, .. = percent passing given sieve for
each agg.
a, b, c, … = decimal fraction of A, B, C, … to be
used
BLENDING STOCKPILESBLENDING STOCKPILES
Plot individual gradations
Plot specification limits
Can be used for initial assessment
Can blend be made from available materials?
Identification of critical sieves
Est. trial proportions
TRIAL AND ERROR STEPSTRIAL AND ERROR STEPS
Select critical sieves in blend
Determine initial proportions which will
meet critical sieves
Check calc. blend against specification
Adjust if necessary and repeat above steps
Blended Aggregate Specific GravitiesBlended Aggregate Specific Gravities
Once the percentages of the stockpiles
have been established, the combined
aggregate specific gravities can also be
calculated
COMBINED SPECIFIC GRAVITIESCOMBINED SPECIFIC GRAVITIES
G =
1
P1 + P2 + ……. Pn
100 G1 100 G2 100 Gn
BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES
Reasons for Blending
Obtain desirable gradation
Single natural or quarried material not
enough
Economical to combine natural and process
materials
BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES
Agg. #2Agg. #1
Blend Target
Material
%
Passing
%
Passing
% Used
U.S. Sieve
%
Batch
%
Batch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
No. 200
3/8 “
90
30
7
3
1
0
0
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
10
100
BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES
Agg. #2Agg. #1
Blend Target
Material
%
Passing
%
Passing
% Used
U.S. Sieve
%
Batch
%
Batch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
No. 200
3/8 “
45
15
3.5
1.5
0.5
0
0
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
10
100
50 %50 %
First Try
(remember trial & error)
90
30
7
3
1
0
0
50
90 * 0.5 = 45
30 * 0.5 = 15
7 * 0.5 = 3.5
3 * 0.5 = 1.5
1 * 0.5 = 0.5
0 * 0.5 = 50
0 * 0.5 = 0
100 * 0.5 = 50
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
2 - 10
100
BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES
Agg. #2Agg. #1
Blend Target
Material
%
Passing
%
Passing
% Used
U.S. Sieve
%
Batch
%
Batch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
No. 200
3/8 “
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
2 - 10
100
45
15
3.5
1.5
0.5
0
0
100
50
50
44
23.5
16
12
5
50
50 %50 %
90
30
7
3
1
0
0
50
95
65
47.5
25
16.5
12
5
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
10
100
BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES
Agg. #2Agg. #1
Blend Target
Material
%
Passing
%
Passing
% Used
U.S. Sieve
%
Batch
%
Batch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
No. 200
3/8 “
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
2 - 10
100
45
15
3.5
1.5
0.5
0
0
100
50
50
44
23.5
16
12
5
50
50 %50 %
90
30
7
3
1
0
0
50
95
65
47.5
25
16.5
12
5
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
10
100Let’s Try
and get
a little closer
to the middle of
the target values.
BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES
Agg. #2Agg. #1
Blend Target
Material
%
Passing
%
Passing
% Used
U.S. Sieve
%
Batch
%
Batch
No. 4
No. 8
No. 16
No. 30
No. 50
No. 100
No. 200
3/8 “
80 - 100
65 - 100
40 - 80
20 - 65
7 - 40
3 - 20
2 - 10
100
27
9
2.1
0.9
0.3
0
0
100
70
70
61.6
32.9
22.4
16.8
7
70
70 %30 %
90
30
7
3
1
0
0
30
97
79
63.7
33.8
22.7
16.8
7
100
100
100
88
47
32
24
10
100
Other Aggregate PropertiesOther Aggregate Properties
Aggregate Crushing Value
Aggregate Impact Value
Los Angeles Abrasion
Soundness
Sand Equivalent
AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUEAGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE
• Metal measure
• Tamping rod
Below mentioned are its
specifications:
• Three sizes 75mm dia for 1/8
to 1/4 Size aggregate,
150mm dia for 3/8 to 3/4
Size aggregate
300mm dia for 1in to 2in
size aggregate
The aggregate crushing value indicates the ability of an
aggregate to resist crushing. 
The lower the figure the stronger the aggregate, i.e. the
greater its ability to resist crushing.
AGGREGATE CRUSHING
VALUE
Aggregate passing IS sieve 12.5 mm and
retained on 10 mm sieve is generally used.
Oven dried aggregates are filled in the
measuring cylinder of 11.5cm dia. & 18.0cm
height in 3 equal layers, each layer being
subjected to 25 tamps with a tamping rod of
16mm dia and 45 to 60mm long.
AGGREGATE CRUSHING
VALUE
The crushing test apparatus consist of a
15cm dia open ended heavy steel cylinder,
plunger and a base plate.
Compression testing machine a load of 40
tonnes is applied in 10 min. crushed
aggregate Sieved through 2.36 mm sieve.
 Agg crushing value > 35 weak for pavement.
 Agg crushing value < 10 exceptionally strong.
 For majority of aggregates the impact value and
crushing value are numerically similar.
 Rock group Crushing value Impact value
Basalt 14 15
Granite 20 19
Lime stone 24 23
Quartzite 16 21
AGGREGATE CRUSHING
VALUE
AGGREGATE IMPACTVALUE
A base, which helps in supporting
the columns to form a rigid
framework around the quick release
trigger mechanism for ensuring the
effective free fall of the hammer
during test.
The hammer is offered with locking
arrangement and the free fall can be
easily adjusted through the 380+
5mm.
cylindrical cup, with the metal
measure 75 mm dia x 50 mm high
and tamping rod.
Satisfactory resistance to crushing under roller during
construction. Adequate resistance to surface abrasion
under traffic.
IMPACT VALUE
 Due to traffic loads the road stones are subjected to impact.
 IS sieves 12.5 mm,10 mm & 2.36 mm.
 Cylindrical steel cup of dia 10.2 cm & depth 5 cm.
 Metal hammer of weight 13.5 to 14 kg. Height of fall 38 cm.
Cylindrical measure with internal dia 7.5 cm & depth 5 cm.
 Metal tamping of 1 cm dia.23 cm long.
< 10 % exceptionally strong.
10 - 20 % strong.
20 - 30 % satisfactory. > 35 % weak.
ELONGATION & FLAKINESS INDEXELONGATION & FLAKINESS INDEX
 When the length is more than 1.8 of the mean dimension,
then the aggregate particles are considered elongated.
The aggregate particles are to be flaky, if the thickness is
less than the 0.6 of their mean dimension.
LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST
Start with fraction retained on No. 12 sieve
Sample submerged in magnesium or sodium sulfate—causes
salt crystals to form in the aggregate pores
SOUNDNESSSOUNDNESS TESTTEST
SAND EQUIVALENTSAND EQUIVALENT
SE = (Height of Sand/Height of
Clay)100
This is a test to determine the amount of
clay in fine aggregate.
Aggregate passing a No. 4 sieve is
agitated in a water-filled transparent
cylinder. Liquid is water and flocculating
agent. After settling, the sand separates
from the flocculated clay. Measure each.
ThanksThanks

More Related Content

PPTX
SHEAR STRENGTH THEORY
PPTX
Cone Penetration Test
DOCX
Geotechnical Engineering : Soil classification
PPTX
GEOSYNTHETIC TESTING TECHNIQUES
PDF
Dynamic Soil Properties
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7: Soil Stresses due to External Load]
PPTX
Design of cc pavement by IRC 58
SHEAR STRENGTH THEORY
Cone Penetration Test
Geotechnical Engineering : Soil classification
GEOSYNTHETIC TESTING TECHNIQUES
Dynamic Soil Properties
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7: Soil Stresses due to External Load]
Design of cc pavement by IRC 58

What's hot (20)

PPT
Subgrade Stabilization: Materials & Methods
PPTX
Standard_Penetration_Test__SPT_.pptx
PDF
Concrete pavement design
PDF
Machine Foundation Design
PDF
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
PDF
Stability of Slopes
PPTX
Consolidation settlement
PPTX
Grain size analysis
PPTX
California bearing ratio test (CBR TEST)
PPTX
Method of-slices
PDF
Soil Bearing Capacity.pdf
PDF
DETERMINATION OF AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE.
PDF
Chapter 1: Foundation Engineering
PDF
Plate load test
PPTX
Standard Penetration Test
PDF
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
PPTX
Foundation and Retaining Wall Design Presentation 2.pptx
PDF
Lecture 4 classification of soil
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
Subgrade Stabilization: Materials & Methods
Standard_Penetration_Test__SPT_.pptx
Concrete pavement design
Machine Foundation Design
Class 6 Shear Strength - Direct Shear Test ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Stability of Slopes
Consolidation settlement
Grain size analysis
California bearing ratio test (CBR TEST)
Method of-slices
Soil Bearing Capacity.pdf
DETERMINATION OF AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE.
Chapter 1: Foundation Engineering
Plate load test
Standard Penetration Test
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Foundation and Retaining Wall Design Presentation 2.pptx
Lecture 4 classification of soil
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #13: Elastic Settlements]
Ad

Similar to ROAD AGGREGATES 01 (20)

PPTX
Chapter 4 Unbound Pavement Materials.pptx
PPT
Soil lab (Aggregates Testing)
PPT
aggregatepropertiespavement05jb1lect2grad.ppt
PDF
Lecture_3-Aggregate_Civil Engineering.pdf
PPT
Packing Characteristics_old
PPT
Lect 18-conventional asphalt mix design
PPTX
Aggregate testing
PPTX
AIV.pptx
DOCX
I cycle
PDF
Aggregate impact and crushing test
PPTX
CON 121 Session 3 - Standards and Evaluation
PDF
Gradation of fine aggregate by sieve analysis
PPT
Basic blasting
PPTX
Design mix method of bitumenous materials by Marshall stability method
PPTX
Material Testing - Aggregates Impact Value.pptx
PDF
Svedala 1208
PPTX
Impact value test
PDF
Lab reports transportation engineering i
PPTX
Metso mineral india ltd.
PDF
The permeability and indirect tensile strength characteristics of porous asph...
Chapter 4 Unbound Pavement Materials.pptx
Soil lab (Aggregates Testing)
aggregatepropertiespavement05jb1lect2grad.ppt
Lecture_3-Aggregate_Civil Engineering.pdf
Packing Characteristics_old
Lect 18-conventional asphalt mix design
Aggregate testing
AIV.pptx
I cycle
Aggregate impact and crushing test
CON 121 Session 3 - Standards and Evaluation
Gradation of fine aggregate by sieve analysis
Basic blasting
Design mix method of bitumenous materials by Marshall stability method
Material Testing - Aggregates Impact Value.pptx
Svedala 1208
Impact value test
Lab reports transportation engineering i
Metso mineral india ltd.
The permeability and indirect tensile strength characteristics of porous asph...
Ad

More from Muhammad Faisal (16)

PPTX
Trip generation
PPTX
Paper writing
PPTX
Research processes.pptx
PPT
An Intro to estimating travel demand
PPTX
Highway Geometric Design control and criteria-2
PPT
Road Aggregates
PPT
Soil Exploration
PPT
Compaction and Drain-ability
PPT
Compaction and Drainability 01
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_5
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_4
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_3
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_2
PPT
Lecture 01 lab (Soil)
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_1
PPT
Intro. to Pavement Engineering Materials
Trip generation
Paper writing
Research processes.pptx
An Intro to estimating travel demand
Highway Geometric Design control and criteria-2
Road Aggregates
Soil Exploration
Compaction and Drain-ability
Compaction and Drainability 01
Pavement Engineering Materials_5
Pavement Engineering Materials_4
Pavement Engineering Materials_3
Pavement Engineering Materials_2
Lecture 01 lab (Soil)
Pavement Engineering Materials_1
Intro. to Pavement Engineering Materials

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
ChapteR012372321DFGDSFGDFGDFSGDFGDFGDFGSDFGDFGFD
PDF
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN FRAUD DETECTION
PPTX
Chemical Technological Processes, Feasibility Study and Chemical Process Indu...
PPTX
Sorting and Hashing in Data Structures with Algorithms, Techniques, Implement...
PPTX
CURRICULAM DESIGN engineering FOR CSE 2025.pptx
PPTX
introduction to high performance computing
PDF
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
PPTX
tack Data Structure with Array and Linked List Implementation, Push and Pop O...
PDF
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
PDF
Design Guidelines and solutions for Plastics parts
PDF
BIO-INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE FOR PARSIMONIOUS CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : THE ...
PDF
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
PDF
Visual Aids for Exploratory Data Analysis.pdf
PDF
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
PDF
EXPLORING LEARNING ENGAGEMENT FACTORS INFLUENCING BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND ...
PDF
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
PPTX
6ME3A-Unit-II-Sensors and Actuators_Handouts.pptx
PPTX
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
PDF
Categorization of Factors Affecting Classification Algorithms Selection
PDF
UNIT no 1 INTRODUCTION TO DBMS NOTES.pdf
ChapteR012372321DFGDSFGDFGDFSGDFGDFGDFGSDFGDFGFD
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF APPLICATIONS IN FRAUD DETECTION
Chemical Technological Processes, Feasibility Study and Chemical Process Indu...
Sorting and Hashing in Data Structures with Algorithms, Techniques, Implement...
CURRICULAM DESIGN engineering FOR CSE 2025.pptx
introduction to high performance computing
III.4.1.2_The_Space_Environment.p pdffdf
tack Data Structure with Array and Linked List Implementation, Push and Pop O...
Exploratory_Data_Analysis_Fundamentals.pdf
Design Guidelines and solutions for Plastics parts
BIO-INSPIRED ARCHITECTURE FOR PARSIMONIOUS CONVERSATIONAL INTELLIGENCE : THE ...
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
Visual Aids for Exploratory Data Analysis.pdf
Soil Improvement Techniques Note - Rabbi
EXPLORING LEARNING ENGAGEMENT FACTORS INFLUENCING BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND ...
null (2) bgfbg bfgb bfgb fbfg bfbgf b.pdf
6ME3A-Unit-II-Sensors and Actuators_Handouts.pptx
Graph Data Structures with Types, Traversals, Connectivity, and Real-Life App...
Categorization of Factors Affecting Classification Algorithms Selection
UNIT no 1 INTRODUCTION TO DBMS NOTES.pdf

ROAD AGGREGATES 01

  • 2. PAVEMENT MATERIALSPAVEMENT MATERIALS ENGINEERINGENGINEERING (CE-862)(CE-862) Lec-10 Fall Semester 2016   Dr. Arshad Hussain arshad_nit@yahoo.com , Office Room#111, Tel: 05190854163, Cell: 03419756251 National Institute of Transportation (NIT) School of Civil & Environmental Engineering (SCEE) National University of Science and Technology (NUST) NUST Campus, Sector H-12, Islamabad
  • 4. AGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATIONAGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATION Aggregate Physical Properties Maximum Aggregate Size Gradation Other Aggregate Properties  Toughness and Abrasion Resistance  Specific Gravity  Particle Shape and Surface Texture  Durability and Soundness  Cleanliness and Deleterious Materials
  • 5. AGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATIONAGGREGATE CHARACTERIZATION Maximum Aggregate Size Maximum size The smallest sieve through which 100 percent of the aggregate particles pass. Nominal maximum size The largest sieve that retains some of the aggregate particles but generally not more than 10 percent by weight. 
  • 6. Aggregate Size DefinitionsAggregate Size Definitions Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size ◦ one size larger than the first sieve to retain more than 10% Maximum Aggregate Size ◦ one size larger than nominal maximum size 100100 100100 9090 7272 6565 4848 3636 2222 1515 99 44 100100 9999 8989 7272 6565 4848 3636 2222 1515 99 44
  • 7. AGGREGATE GRADATIONAGGREGATE GRADATION  Use 0.45 Power Gradation Chart  Blend Size Definitions ◦ maximum size ◦ nominal maximum size Gradation Limits ◦ control points ◦ restricted zone
  • 8. Example:Example: 4.75 mm sieve plots at (4.75)4.75 mm sieve plots at (4.75)0.450.45 = 2.02= 2.02 Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power 00 2020 4040 6060 8080 100100 00 11 22 33 44 Percent PassingPercent Passing 0.45 Power Grading Chart0.45 Power Grading Chart
  • 9. 0.45 Power Grading Chart0.45 Power Grading Chart 0 .075 .3 .6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.00 .075 .3 .6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power 00 2020 4040 6060 8080 100100 maximum density linemaximum density line Percent PassingPercent Passing maxmax sizesize
  • 12. Calculation of the Max Density CurveCalculation of the Max Density Curve n D d P       = where P = % finer than the sieve d = aggregate size being considered D = maximum aggregate size being used n = parameter which equals 0.45—represents the maximum particle packing
  • 13. 100100 00 .075.075 .3.3 2.362.36 4.754.75 9.59.5 12.5 19.012.5 19.0 Percent PassingPercent Passing control pointcontrol point restricted zonerestricted zone max density linemax density line maxmax sizesize nomnom maxmax sizesize Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power
  • 14. Superpave Aggregate GradationSuperpave Aggregate Gradation 100100 00 .075.075 .3.3 2.362.36 12.512.5 19.019.0 Percent PassingPercent Passing Design Aggregate StructureDesign Aggregate Structure Sieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 PowerSieve Size (mm) Raised to 0.45 Power
  • 15. Superpave Mix Size DesignationsSuperpave Mix Size Designations SuperpaveSuperpave Nom Max SizeNom Max Size Max SizeMax Size DesignationDesignation (mm)(mm) (mm)(mm) 37.5 mm37.5 mm 37.537.5 5050 25 mm25 mm 2525 37.537.5 19 mm19 mm 1919 2525 12.5 mm12.5 mm 12.512.5 1919 9.5 mm9.5 mm 9.59.5 12.512.5
  • 16. GRADATIONS * Considerations: - Max. size < 1/2 AC lift thickness - Larger max size + Increases strength + Improves skid resistance + Increases volume and surface area of agg which decreases required AC content + Improves rut resistance + Increases problem with segregation of particles - Smaller max size + Reduces segregation + Reduces road noise + Decreases tire wear
  • 17. TARGET GRADATIONTARGET GRADATION Acceptable gradation band specified Mix design selects a job mix formula (JMF) which falls within band and meets design criteria Superpave ◦ 5 nominal sizes (37.5, 25, 19, 12.5, and 9.5 mm) ◦ Four sieve sizes used to set upper and lower limits ◦ Staying out of the restricted zone in suggested to minimize problems with natural sands
  • 18. BLENDING STOCKPILESBLENDING STOCKPILES Basic formula for combining stockpiles to achieve a target gradation is: p = Aa + Bb + Cc + …. where: p = percent of material passing given sieve size A, B, C, .. = percent passing given sieve for each agg. a, b, c, … = decimal fraction of A, B, C, … to be used
  • 19. BLENDING STOCKPILESBLENDING STOCKPILES Plot individual gradations Plot specification limits Can be used for initial assessment Can blend be made from available materials? Identification of critical sieves Est. trial proportions
  • 20. TRIAL AND ERROR STEPSTRIAL AND ERROR STEPS Select critical sieves in blend Determine initial proportions which will meet critical sieves Check calc. blend against specification Adjust if necessary and repeat above steps
  • 21. Blended Aggregate Specific GravitiesBlended Aggregate Specific Gravities Once the percentages of the stockpiles have been established, the combined aggregate specific gravities can also be calculated
  • 22. COMBINED SPECIFIC GRAVITIESCOMBINED SPECIFIC GRAVITIES G = 1 P1 + P2 + ……. Pn 100 G1 100 G2 100 Gn
  • 23. BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES Reasons for Blending Obtain desirable gradation Single natural or quarried material not enough Economical to combine natural and process materials
  • 24. BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES Agg. #2Agg. #1 Blend Target Material % Passing % Passing % Used U.S. Sieve % Batch % Batch No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 No. 200 3/8 “ 90 30 7 3 1 0 0 100 100 100 88 47 32 24 10 100
  • 25. BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES Agg. #2Agg. #1 Blend Target Material % Passing % Passing % Used U.S. Sieve % Batch % Batch No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 No. 200 3/8 “ 45 15 3.5 1.5 0.5 0 0 100 100 100 88 47 32 24 10 100 50 %50 % First Try (remember trial & error) 90 30 7 3 1 0 0 50 90 * 0.5 = 45 30 * 0.5 = 15 7 * 0.5 = 3.5 3 * 0.5 = 1.5 1 * 0.5 = 0.5 0 * 0.5 = 50 0 * 0.5 = 0 100 * 0.5 = 50 80 - 100 65 - 100 40 - 80 20 - 65 7 - 40 3 - 20 2 - 10 100
  • 26. BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES Agg. #2Agg. #1 Blend Target Material % Passing % Passing % Used U.S. Sieve % Batch % Batch No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 No. 200 3/8 “ 80 - 100 65 - 100 40 - 80 20 - 65 7 - 40 3 - 20 2 - 10 100 45 15 3.5 1.5 0.5 0 0 100 50 50 44 23.5 16 12 5 50 50 %50 % 90 30 7 3 1 0 0 50 95 65 47.5 25 16.5 12 5 100 100 100 88 47 32 24 10 100
  • 27. BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES Agg. #2Agg. #1 Blend Target Material % Passing % Passing % Used U.S. Sieve % Batch % Batch No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 No. 200 3/8 “ 80 - 100 65 - 100 40 - 80 20 - 65 7 - 40 3 - 20 2 - 10 100 45 15 3.5 1.5 0.5 0 0 100 50 50 44 23.5 16 12 5 50 50 %50 % 90 30 7 3 1 0 0 50 95 65 47.5 25 16.5 12 5 100 100 100 88 47 32 24 10 100Let’s Try and get a little closer to the middle of the target values.
  • 28. BLENDING OF AGGREGATESBLENDING OF AGGREGATES Agg. #2Agg. #1 Blend Target Material % Passing % Passing % Used U.S. Sieve % Batch % Batch No. 4 No. 8 No. 16 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 No. 200 3/8 “ 80 - 100 65 - 100 40 - 80 20 - 65 7 - 40 3 - 20 2 - 10 100 27 9 2.1 0.9 0.3 0 0 100 70 70 61.6 32.9 22.4 16.8 7 70 70 %30 % 90 30 7 3 1 0 0 30 97 79 63.7 33.8 22.7 16.8 7 100 100 100 88 47 32 24 10 100
  • 29. Other Aggregate PropertiesOther Aggregate Properties Aggregate Crushing Value Aggregate Impact Value Los Angeles Abrasion Soundness Sand Equivalent
  • 30. AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUEAGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE • Metal measure • Tamping rod Below mentioned are its specifications: • Three sizes 75mm dia for 1/8 to 1/4 Size aggregate, 150mm dia for 3/8 to 3/4 Size aggregate 300mm dia for 1in to 2in size aggregate The aggregate crushing value indicates the ability of an aggregate to resist crushing.  The lower the figure the stronger the aggregate, i.e. the greater its ability to resist crushing.
  • 31. AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE Aggregate passing IS sieve 12.5 mm and retained on 10 mm sieve is generally used. Oven dried aggregates are filled in the measuring cylinder of 11.5cm dia. & 18.0cm height in 3 equal layers, each layer being subjected to 25 tamps with a tamping rod of 16mm dia and 45 to 60mm long.
  • 32. AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE The crushing test apparatus consist of a 15cm dia open ended heavy steel cylinder, plunger and a base plate. Compression testing machine a load of 40 tonnes is applied in 10 min. crushed aggregate Sieved through 2.36 mm sieve.
  • 33.  Agg crushing value > 35 weak for pavement.  Agg crushing value < 10 exceptionally strong.  For majority of aggregates the impact value and crushing value are numerically similar.  Rock group Crushing value Impact value Basalt 14 15 Granite 20 19 Lime stone 24 23 Quartzite 16 21 AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE
  • 34. AGGREGATE IMPACTVALUE A base, which helps in supporting the columns to form a rigid framework around the quick release trigger mechanism for ensuring the effective free fall of the hammer during test. The hammer is offered with locking arrangement and the free fall can be easily adjusted through the 380+ 5mm. cylindrical cup, with the metal measure 75 mm dia x 50 mm high and tamping rod. Satisfactory resistance to crushing under roller during construction. Adequate resistance to surface abrasion under traffic.
  • 35. IMPACT VALUE  Due to traffic loads the road stones are subjected to impact.  IS sieves 12.5 mm,10 mm & 2.36 mm.  Cylindrical steel cup of dia 10.2 cm & depth 5 cm.  Metal hammer of weight 13.5 to 14 kg. Height of fall 38 cm. Cylindrical measure with internal dia 7.5 cm & depth 5 cm.  Metal tamping of 1 cm dia.23 cm long. < 10 % exceptionally strong. 10 - 20 % strong. 20 - 30 % satisfactory. > 35 % weak.
  • 36. ELONGATION & FLAKINESS INDEXELONGATION & FLAKINESS INDEX  When the length is more than 1.8 of the mean dimension, then the aggregate particles are considered elongated. The aggregate particles are to be flaky, if the thickness is less than the 0.6 of their mean dimension.
  • 37. LOS ANGELES ABRASION TEST Start with fraction retained on No. 12 sieve
  • 38. Sample submerged in magnesium or sodium sulfate—causes salt crystals to form in the aggregate pores SOUNDNESSSOUNDNESS TESTTEST
  • 39. SAND EQUIVALENTSAND EQUIVALENT SE = (Height of Sand/Height of Clay)100 This is a test to determine the amount of clay in fine aggregate. Aggregate passing a No. 4 sieve is agitated in a water-filled transparent cylinder. Liquid is water and flocculating agent. After settling, the sand separates from the flocculated clay. Measure each.

Editor's Notes

  • #7: For HMA pavements these are the definitions for gradations.
  • #9: To specify gradation the HMA industry uses a .45 power graph. It is a modification of the Fuller’s curve used by geotechnical engineers - rather than use a power of 0.50 it uses a 0.45 for the exponent in the equation.
  • #10: The maximum density gradation (line) represents a gradation in which the aggregate particles fit together in their densest possible arrangement. This is not the most desirable gradation for HMA because there would be very little aggregate space within which to develop sufficiently thick asphalt films for a durable mixture.
  • #12: This illustration shows linear lines for six different maximum aggregate sizes. Aggregate gradations that conform to one of these lines has the maximum packing of particle sizes. On the next image, the equation for calculating these lines is shown.
  • #14: To specify aggregate gradation, two additional features are added to the 0.45 chart: control points and a restricted zone. Control points function as master ranges through which gradations must pass. They are placed on the nominal maximum size, an intermediate size and the dust size. The restricted zone resides along the maximum density gradation between the intermediate size (either 4.75 or 2.36 mm) and the 0.3 mm size. It forms a band through which gradations should not pass. Gradations that pass through the restricted zone have often been called “humped gradations” because of the characteristic hump in the grading curve that passes through the restricted zone. In most cases, a humped gradation indicates a mixture that possesses too much fine sand in relation to total sand. This gradation practically always results in tender mix behavior, which is manifested by a mixture that is difficult to compact during construction and offers reduced resistance to permanent deformation during its performance life. Gradations that violate the restricted zone possess weak aggregate skeletons that depend too much on asphalt binder stiffness to achieve mixture shear strength. These mixtures are also very sensitive to asphalt content and can easily become plastic.
  • #15: The term used to describe the cumulative frequency distribution of aggregate particle sizes is the design aggregate structure. A design aggregate structure that lies between the control points and avoids the restricted zone meets the requirements of Superpave with respect to gradation. Superpave defines five mixture types as defined by their nominal maximum aggregate size:
  • #17: Several factors need to be considered in selecting a desirable aggregate gradation. The maximum size of the aggregate needs to be at a minimum less than one half of the planned lift thickness. Current construction practices with Superpave gradations indicate that this needs to be changed to less than one-third of the lift thickness. Larger maximum size aggregate gradations have several advantages such as improved aggregate interlock, improved skid resistance and improved rut resistance. Local availability of aggregates will usually dictate the largest size aggregate. Also, the larger maximum size gradations also tend to have more problems with gradation separation (segregation) during construction.
  • #18: Target gradations are usually selected to meet an agency-specified gradation band. The selected gradation needs to meet the agency requirements as well as all other Superpave gradation and aggregate requirements. At the present time, there are 5 Superpave gradation bands. Each uses 4 sieve sizes to set upper and lower limits on the gradation. The restricted zone was originally included to help eliminate rounded natural sands. However, with the requirements on fine aggregate angularity, the need to stay out of the restricted zone is evaluated on a case by case basis (historical experience).
  • #19: Once a target gradation or gradation band is selected, percentages of the aggregate stockpiles needed to produce an acceptable gradation are determined. This is usually accomplished using a spreadsheet and a trial and error approach.