Rubric Assessment
Top of Form
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Evaluation Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
0 %
Unsatisfactory
45 points
45 %
Emerging
51 points
51 %
Proficient
58 points
58 %
Exemplary
65 points
65 %
Explained the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are missing or inaccurate.
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are vague or incomplete.
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are somewhat vague or
incomplete.
Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
suppliers, and payers in your state are complete and
comprehensive.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Described the legal reporting obligations that impact the health
care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are missing or inaccurate.
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are vague or incomplete.
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are somewhat vague or incomplete.
Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the
health care environment and are of concern to the health care
administrator are complete and comprehensive.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Described an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal
reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are missing or inaccurate.
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are vague or incomplete.
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are present but more could have been used to provide
better application to the issue.
Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the
legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the
violations are present to support the issue.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are missing or inaccurate.
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are vague or incomplete.
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are present but more could have been
used to provide better discussion to the issue.
Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations
for the selected example are present to support the issue.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Written Components
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment
Introduction is limited or missing entirely.
Poorly organized document.
Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.
Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and
comprehension.
No attempt at APA formatting.
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and
comprehension.
Transitions are sporadic.
Conclusion is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or
sentence structure that interferes with readability and
comprehension.
APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and
cite; but errors are significant.
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background
information, and states the topic.
Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.
Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.
Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar
throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with
readability or comprehension.
APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and
cite; but a few errors present.
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling
and appropriate background information, and clearly states the
topic.
Well organized document with an appropriate introduction.
Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate.
Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and
provides concluding insights.
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar
throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in
following the writer’s logic.
APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for.
Clear Override
Override
/ 65
/ 65
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total Score Total Total Score
Clear Override
Clear Override
Override
/ 325
/ 325
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Evidence0 points minimum
Clear Override
Unsatisfactory225 points minimum
Clear Override
Emerging255 points minimum
Clear Override
Proficient290 points minimum
Clear Override
Exemplary325 points minimum
Clear Override
Overall Feedback
Close
Bottom of Form
[{'c_rubricpreview
[{'3':['grid','page
PmgybnRcmUJvq
-3366302996388
Rubric Assessment
Top of Form
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51)
51 points
51 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)
59 points
59 %
Proficient (B Range) (60–66)
66 points
66 %
Exemplary (A Range) (67–75)
75 points
75 %
Includes all assignment components and meets graduate level
critical thinking. A purpose statement is identified for the
response.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose
statement is provided.
Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and
breath. Purpose statement is vague.
Assignment meets most of expectations with all components
being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is
present and appropriate for the assignment.
Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and
breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all
requirements of the assignment.
Clear Override
Override
/ 75
/ 75
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51)
51 points
51 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)
59 points
59 %
Proficient (B Range) (60–66)
66 points
66 %
Exemplary (A Range) (67–75)
75 points
75 %
Integrates and understands assignments concepts and topics.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment
concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key
assignment concepts.
Clear Override
Override
/ 75
/ 75
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51)
51 points
51 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)
59 points
59 %
Proficient (B Range) (60–66)
66 points
66 %
Exemplary (A Range) (67–75)
75 points
75 %
Synthesizes, analyses, and evaluates resources to apply concepts
in the assignment.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts and
strategies.
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major
points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification
to support major topics. Uses one credible resource in the
assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates,
confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major
points presented. Uses a minimum of two credible resources in
the assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates,
confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major
points presented. Uses three credible resources for the
assignment, including at least one scholarly peer-reviewed
resource.
Clear Override
Override
/ 75
/ 75
*
Criterion score has been overridden
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria
No Submission
0 points
0 %
Emerging (F through D Range) (1–17)
17 points
17 %
Satisfactory (C Range) (18–19)
19 points
19 %
Proficient (B Range) (20–22)
22 points
22 %
Exemplary (A Range) (23–25)
25 points
25 %
Uses correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary.
Provides credible resources using correct APA format.
Add Feedback
Student did not submit assignment.
Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA
errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Contains a few (3–4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA
errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Clear Override
Override
/ 25
/ 25
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total Score Total Total Score
Clear Override
Clear Override
Override
/ 250
/ 250
*
Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Submission0 points minimum
Clear Override
Emerging (F through D Range)1 point minimum
Clear Override
Satisfactory (C Range)175 points minimum
Clear Override
Proficient (B Range)200 points minimum
Clear Override
Exemplary (A Range)225 points minimum
Clear Override
Overall Feedback
Close
Bottom of Form
[{'c_rubricpreview
[{'3':['grid','page
C2MaJkaaeiLHUW
-9195283816361

More Related Content

DOCX
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 081921Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]D
DOCX
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docx
DOCX
Quality Improvement.docx
DOCX
Quality Improvement.docx
PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2018 (marking instructions)
DOCX
Msn565 signature assignment rubric asl v1 course nursing lea
PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2016 (marking instructions)
PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2019 (marking instructions)
Discussion # 1 Due Weds 081921Wk 8 Discussion 1 [due Thurs]D
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docx
Quality Improvement.docx
Quality Improvement.docx
Advanced Higher History exam - 2018 (marking instructions)
Msn565 signature assignment rubric asl v1 course nursing lea
Advanced Higher History exam - 2016 (marking instructions)
Advanced Higher History exam - 2019 (marking instructions)

Similar to Rubric AssessmentTop of FormThis table lists criteria and .docx (20)

PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2021 (marking instructions)
PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2022 (marking instructions)
PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2023 (marking instructions)
DOCX
scano1232017-03-06 0021 Chamberlain College of NursingNR 45.docx
DOC
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
DOC
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
DOC
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
DOC
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
DOC
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
DOCX
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
DOCX
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
DOCX
ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx
DOCX
HUMANITIES 105 - THE HUMAN STRUGGLE PRESENTATION ASSIG.docx
DOCX
Congratulations! You made it to the last week of the course. You.docx
DOCX
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
DOCX
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
PDF
Advanced Higher History exam - 2017 (marking instructions)
PPTX
Grading criteria and marking schemes, Liz Norman, ANZCVS Exam Writing Worksho...
DOCX
Interview With a Nurse LeaderGuidelinesPurposeThe following.docx
DOCX
1-Unsatisfactory 0.00 2-Less Satisfa.docx
Advanced Higher History exam - 2021 (marking instructions)
Advanced Higher History exam - 2022 (marking instructions)
Advanced Higher History exam - 2023 (marking instructions)
scano1232017-03-06 0021 Chamberlain College of NursingNR 45.docx
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 3 your policy priority issue
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
TaskAssignment 3 consists of one problem question worth 10 marks.docx
ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docx
HUMANITIES 105 - THE HUMAN STRUGGLE PRESENTATION ASSIG.docx
Congratulations! You made it to the last week of the course. You.docx
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docx
Advanced Higher History exam - 2017 (marking instructions)
Grading criteria and marking schemes, Liz Norman, ANZCVS Exam Writing Worksho...
Interview With a Nurse LeaderGuidelinesPurposeThe following.docx
1-Unsatisfactory 0.00 2-Less Satisfa.docx

More from toddr4 (20)

DOCX
Running head 2.3 - CASE ANALYSIS FUNDING THE RAILROADS 1 .docx
DOCX
Running head 50 CHARACTER VERSION OF TITLE IN CAPS 1 .docx
DOCX
Running Head YOUTH IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMYOUTH IN TH.docx
DOCX
Running head TITLE1TITLE2Research QuestionHow doe.docx
DOCX
Running Head VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT1VULNERABILITY ASSESSMEN.docx
DOCX
Running head STARBUCKS’ STRATEGY 1 Starbuc.docx
DOCX
Running head SHORTENED VERSION OF TITLE1Title of Your Rese.docx
DOCX
Running Head THEMATIC OUTLINE .docx
DOCX
Running head TOPIC RESEARCH PROPOSAL .docx
DOCX
Running Head VIRTUAL ORGANIZATION .docx
DOCX
Running Head THE MARKETING PLAN .docx
DOCX
Running head TITLE OF ESSAY1TITLE OF ESSAY 2Title .docx
DOCX
Running head Project Type Unit 5 Individual Project3Ty.docx
DOCX
Rubric Writing Assignment Rubric Criteria Level 3 Level.docx
DOCX
Running Head ON-BOARDING .docx
DOCX
Running head PERSPECTIVE ON INTEGRATION BETWEEN CHRISTIAN FAITH .docx
DOCX
RubricThe final for this course is a paper titled Improvement Proj.docx
DOCX
Running Head LETTER OF ADVICE .docx
DOCX
Running head LEADERSHIP PORTFOLIO1LEADERSHIP PORTFOLIO4.docx
DOCX
Running Head LAB 51LAB 57Lab 5.docx
Running head 2.3 - CASE ANALYSIS FUNDING THE RAILROADS 1 .docx
Running head 50 CHARACTER VERSION OF TITLE IN CAPS 1 .docx
Running Head YOUTH IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMYOUTH IN TH.docx
Running head TITLE1TITLE2Research QuestionHow doe.docx
Running Head VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT1VULNERABILITY ASSESSMEN.docx
Running head STARBUCKS’ STRATEGY 1 Starbuc.docx
Running head SHORTENED VERSION OF TITLE1Title of Your Rese.docx
Running Head THEMATIC OUTLINE .docx
Running head TOPIC RESEARCH PROPOSAL .docx
Running Head VIRTUAL ORGANIZATION .docx
Running Head THE MARKETING PLAN .docx
Running head TITLE OF ESSAY1TITLE OF ESSAY 2Title .docx
Running head Project Type Unit 5 Individual Project3Ty.docx
Rubric Writing Assignment Rubric Criteria Level 3 Level.docx
Running Head ON-BOARDING .docx
Running head PERSPECTIVE ON INTEGRATION BETWEEN CHRISTIAN FAITH .docx
RubricThe final for this course is a paper titled Improvement Proj.docx
Running Head LETTER OF ADVICE .docx
Running head LEADERSHIP PORTFOLIO1LEADERSHIP PORTFOLIO4.docx
Running Head LAB 51LAB 57Lab 5.docx

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PPTX
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
PDF
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PPTX
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
PPTX
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
PDF
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PDF
CRP102_SAGALASSOS_Final_Projects_2025.pdf
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
semiconductor packaging in vlsi design fab
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
Module on health assessment of CHN. pptx
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
IP : I ; Unit I : Preformulation Studies
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
CRP102_SAGALASSOS_Final_Projects_2025.pdf
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf

Rubric AssessmentTop of FormThis table lists criteria and .docx

  • 1. Rubric Assessment Top of Form This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Evaluation Criteria No Evidence 0 points 0 % Unsatisfactory 45 points 45 % Emerging 51 points 51 % Proficient 58 points 58 % Exemplary 65 points 65 % Explained the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are missing or inaccurate. Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are vague or incomplete. Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers,
  • 2. suppliers, and payers in your state are somewhat vague or incomplete. Explanation of the legal reporting requirements for providers, suppliers, and payers in your state are complete and comprehensive. Clear Override Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Described the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are missing or inaccurate. Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are vague or incomplete. Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are somewhat vague or incomplete. Descriptions of the legal reporting obligations that impact the health care environment and are of concern to the health care administrator are complete and comprehensive. Clear Override
  • 3. Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Described an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are missing or inaccurate. Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are vague or incomplete. Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are present but more could have been used to provide better application to the issue. Description of an example, either real or fictitious, where the legal reporting obligations were violated and explained the violations are present to support the issue. Clear Override Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations for the selected example.
  • 4. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations for the selected example are missing or inaccurate. Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations for the selected example are vague or incomplete. Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations for the selected example are present but more could have been used to provide better discussion to the issue. Suggested strategies to avoid violation of reporting obligations for the selected example are present to support the issue. Clear Override Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Written Components Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment Introduction is limited or missing entirely. Poorly organized document. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.
  • 5. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. No attempt at APA formatting. Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that interferes with readability and comprehension. APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but errors are significant. Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. Loosely organized document that may have to be inferred.
  • 6. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. APA format demonstrates attempt to paraphrase, quote, and cite; but a few errors present. Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic. Well organized document with an appropriate introduction. Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for. Clear Override
  • 7. Override / 65 / 65 * Criterion score has been overridden Rubric Total Score Total Total Score Clear Override Clear Override Override / 325 / 325 * Criterion score has been overridden Overall Score Overall Score No Evidence0 points minimum Clear Override Unsatisfactory225 points minimum Clear Override Emerging255 points minimum Clear Override Proficient290 points minimum Clear Override Exemplary325 points minimum Clear Override Overall Feedback
  • 8. Close Bottom of Form [{'c_rubricpreview [{'3':['grid','page PmgybnRcmUJvq -3366302996388 Rubric Assessment Top of Form This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51) 51 points 51 % Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59) 59 points 59 % Proficient (B Range) (60–66) 66 points 66 % Exemplary (A Range) (67–75) 75 points 75 %
  • 9. Includes all assignment components and meets graduate level critical thinking. A purpose statement is identified for the response. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment. Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided. Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is vague. Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment. Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose statement delineates all requirements of the assignment. Clear Override Override / 75 / 75 * Criterion score has been overridden This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51) 51 points 51 % Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59)
  • 10. 59 points 59 % Proficient (B Range) (60–66) 66 points 66 % Exemplary (A Range) (67–75) 75 points 75 % Integrates and understands assignments concepts and topics. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment. Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts. Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts. Clear Override Override / 75 / 75 * Criterion score has been overridden This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D Range) (1–51) 51 points
  • 11. 51 % Satisfactory (C Range) (52–59) 59 points 59 % Proficient (B Range) (60–66) 66 points 66 % Exemplary (A Range) (67–75) 75 points 75 % Synthesizes, analyses, and evaluates resources to apply concepts in the assignment. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment. Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts and strategies. Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses one credible resource in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of two credible resources in the assignment. Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Uses three credible resources for the assignment, including at least one scholarly peer-reviewed resource. Clear Override Override
  • 12. / 75 / 75 * Criterion score has been overridden This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria No Submission 0 points 0 % Emerging (F through D Range) (1–17) 17 points 17 % Satisfactory (C Range) (18–19) 19 points 19 % Proficient (B Range) (20–22) 22 points 22 % Exemplary (A Range) (23–25) 25 points 25 % Uses correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary. Provides credible resources using correct APA format. Add Feedback Student did not submit assignment. Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Contains a few (3–4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors.
  • 13. Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with no errors. Clear Override Override / 25 / 25 * Criterion score has been overridden Rubric Total Score Total Total Score Clear Override Clear Override Override / 250 / 250 * Criterion score has been overridden Overall Score Overall Score No Submission0 points minimum Clear Override Emerging (F through D Range)1 point minimum Clear Override Satisfactory (C Range)175 points minimum Clear Override Proficient (B Range)200 points minimum Clear Override Exemplary (A Range)225 points minimum Clear Override
  • 14. Overall Feedback Close Bottom of Form [{'c_rubricpreview [{'3':['grid','page C2MaJkaaeiLHUW -9195283816361