Rubric Name Copy of General Grading Rubric for Projects .docx
- 1. Rubric Name: Copy of General Grading Rubric for Projects Criteria Equivalent to an A Equivalent to a B Equivalent to a C Equivalent to an F Overall content of paper, analysis, presentation, or project. Value: 20 points 20 points Content of the paper addresses all information required by assignment, demonstrates critical thinking skills, sophisticated
- 2. analysis and other perspectives. Points available: 18-20 17.9 points Content of the paper addresses most or all information required by assignments and demonstrates critical thinking skills, critical analysis and other perspectives. Points available: 16- 17.9 15.9 points Content of the paper addresses a majority of the information required by the assignment and demonstrates some critical thinking skills,
- 3. critical analysis and other perspectives. Points available: 14-15.9 11.9 points Content of the paper addresses a minimal amount of the information required by the assignment and demonstration of critical thinking skills, critical analysis and other perspectives is lacking. Points available: 0-11.9 Overall content of paper, analysis, presentation, or project Value: 20 points 20 points Application of theory and knowledge is
- 4. very evident. Use of topic- specific terminology is correct in all instances. Organization is relevant to topic, clear and understandable with logical flow. Points available: 18-20 17.9 points Comprehensive understanding of theory and knowledge is shown. Use of topic-specific terminology has only minor errors. Minor mistakes in organization and style. Points available: 16- 17.9 15.9 points
- 5. Some understanding of theory and knowledge is shown. Topic-specific terminology is mostly correct. Organization is mostly relevant, clear, and logical. Points available: 14-15.9 11.9 points Understanding of theory and knowledge is lacking in significant respects. Multiple mistakes in topic- specific terminology. Lacks relevance, is unclear, difficult to understand, or logic is missing. Points available: 0-11.9 Responsiveness to Project Description e.g.; application of theory and knowledge to given
- 6. facts Terminology, Organization, etc. Value: 10 points 10 points Assignment is formatted exactly as required, all required citations and references are presentand APA standards are 8.9 points Assignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations, resource requirements are met, citations and references are 7.9 points Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required elements/
- 7. sources or some APA errors are evident. Points available: 7-7.9 5.9 points Assignment is missing major elements, lacks required sources or APA is not followed however a different citation followed in every respect. Points available: 9-10 present and APA standards are followed. Points available: 8-8.9 method is used correctly. Points
- 8. available: 0-5.9 Responsiveness to Project Description e.g.; application of theory and knowledge to given facts Terminology, Organization, etc. Value: 10 points 10 points No or minor English and grammar usage errors. Points available: 9-10 8.9 points A few minor/ inconsequential mistakes in English and grammar. Points available: 8-8.9 7.9 points Some obvious mistakes evident in English and
- 9. grammar usage. Points available: 7-7.9 5.9 points Many mistakes evident in English/grammar usage. Points available: 0-5.9 Responsiveness to Project Description e.g.; application of theory and knowledge to given facts Terminology, Organization, etc. Value: 10 points 10 points Organization is relevant to topic, clear and understandable with logical flow that makes the project easier to follow. Points available: 9-10
- 10. 8.9 points Organization is clear and does not distract from the project’s content. Points available: 8-8.9 7.9 points Organization presents some MINORdistractions from the project’s content. Points available: 7-7.9 5.9 points Organization lacks relevance, is unclear, difficult to understand, or logic is missing that causes distraction for the reader. Points
- 11. available: 0-5.9 Formatting, references, and APA citations 15 points Assignment is formatted exactly as required, all required citations and references are present and APA standards are followed in every respect. Points available 13.5-15 13.4 points Assignment is formatted as required with minor/ inconsequential deviations, resource requirements are met, citations and references are present and APA
- 12. standards are followed. Points available: 12-13.4 11.9 points Assignment mostly formatted as required but missing some required elements/ sources or some APA errors are evident. Points available: 10.5- 11.9 8.9 points Assignment is missing major elements, lacks required sources or APA is not followed however a different citation method is used correctly. Points available 0-8.9
- 13. Grammar/Mechanics 15 points No or minor English and 13.4 points A few minor/ inconsequential mistakes in 11.9 points A few minor/ inconsequential 8.9 points Many mistakes evident in grammar usage errors. Points available 13.5-15 English and
- 14. grammar. Points available 12-13.4 mistakes in English and grammar. Points available: 10.5- 11.9 English/grammar usage. Points available 0-8.9 Overall Score Equivalent to an A 18 or more Equivalent to an B 16 or more Equivalent to an C 12 or more Equivalent to an F 0 or more
- 15. Sheet1See comments at the right of the data set.IDSalaryCompaMidpointAgePerformance RatingServiceGenderRaiseDegreeGender1Grade8231.000233290 915.80FAThe ongoing question that the weekly assignments will focus on is: Are males and females paid the same for equal work (under the Equal Pay Act)? 10220.956233080714.70FANote: to simplfy the analysis, we will assume that jobs within each grade comprise equal work.11231.00023411001914.80FA14241.04323329012160FAT he column labels in the table mean:15241.043233280814.90FAID – Employee sample number Salary – Salary in thousands 23231.000233665613.31FAAge – Age in yearsPerformance Rating – Appraisal rating (Employee evaluation score)26241.043232295216.21FAService – Years of service (rounded)Gender: 0 = male, 1 = female 31241.043232960413.90FAMidpoint – salary grade midpoint Raise – percent of last raise35241.043232390415.31FAGrade – job/pay gradeDegree (0= BSBA 1 = MS)36231.000232775314.31FAGender1 (Male or Female)Compa - salary divided by midpoint37220.956232295216.21FA42241.0432332100815.70F A3341.096313075513.60FB18361.1613131801115.61FB20341.0 963144701614.81FB39351.129312790615.51FB7411.025403210 0815.70FC13421.0504030100214.71FC22571.187484865613.80 FD24501.041483075913.81FD45551.145483695815.20FD17691 .2105727553130FE48651.1405734901115.31FE28751.11967449 5914.41FF43771.1496742952015.51FF19241.043233285104.61 MA25241.0432341704040MA40251.086232490206.30MA2270. 870315280703.90MB32280.903312595405.60MB34280.903312 680204.91MB16471.175404490405.70MC27401.000403580703. 91MC41431.075402580504.30MC5470.9794836901605.71MD3 0491.0204845901804.30MD1581.017573485805.70ME4661.157
- 16. 57421001605.51ME12601.0525752952204.50ME33641.1225735 90905.51ME38560.9825745951104.50ME44601.0525745901605 .21ME46651.1405739752003.91ME47621.087573795505.51ME 49601.0525741952106.60ME50661.1575738801204.60ME6761. 1346736701204.51MF9771.149674910010041MF21761.134674 3951306.31MF29721.074675295505.40MF Sheet2 Sheet3 Sheet1Score:Week 1.Measurement and Description - chapters 1 and 2<1 point>1Measurement issues. Data, even numerically coded variables, can be one of 4 levels - nominal, ordinal, interval, or ratio. It is important to identify which level a variable is, asthis impact the kind of analysis we can do with the data. For example, descriptive statistics such as means can only be done on interval or ratio level data.Please list under each label, the variables in our data set that belong in each group.NominalOrdinalIntervalRatiob.For each variable that you did not call ratio, why did you make that decision?<1 point>2The first step in analyzing data sets is to find some summary descriptive statistics for key variables.For salary, compa, age, performance rating, and service; find the mean, standard deviation, and range for 3 groups: overall sample, Females, and Males.You can use either the Data Analysis Descriptive Statistics tool or the Fx =average and =stdev functions. (the range must be found using the difference between the =max and =min functions with Fx) functions.Note: Place data to the right, if you use Descriptive statistics, place that to the right as well.SalaryCompaAgePerf. Rat.ServiceOverallMeanStandard DeviationRangeFemaleMeanStandard DeviationRangeMaleMeanStandard DeviationRange<1 point>3What is the probability for a:Probabilitya. Randomly selected person being a male in grade E?b. Randomly selected male being in grade E? Note part b is the same as given a male, what is probabilty of being in grade E?c.
- 17. Why are the results different?<1 point>4For each group (overall, females, and males) find:OverallFemaleMalea.The value that cuts off the top 1/3 salary in each group.Hint: can use these Fx functionsb.The z score for each value:Excel's standize functionc.The normal curve probability of exceeding this score:1-normsdist functiond.What is the empirical probability of being at or exceeding this salary value?e.The value that cuts off the top 1/3 compa in each group.f.The z score for each value:g.The normal curve probability of exceeding this score:h.What is the empirical probability of being at or exceeding this compa value?i.How do you interpret the relationship between the data sets? What do they mean about our equal pay for equal work question?<2 points>5. What conclusions can you make about the issue of male and female pay equality? Are all of the results consistent? What is the difference between the sal and compa measures of pay?Conclusions from looking at salary results:Conclusions from looking at compa results:Do both salary measures show the same results?Can we make any conclusions about equal pay for equal work yet? Sheet2 Sheet3