Sample preparation techniques of solid dosage forms

Sample preparation techniques of Solid dosage forms
pharmauptoday@gmail.com

- Introduction
Challenges & Requirements
Steps of sample analysis
Impacting variables
- Disintegration / Dispersion
- Agitation Techniques
- Particle Size Reduction Techniques
- Post-extraction Considerations
- Stability & Compatibility of Sample Solution
Contents

Introduction
• A significant portion of the time spent in testing and analyzing samples is spent on the
sample preparation portion of the method.
• Developing appropriate extraction and sample preparation methods can be challenging
for pharmaceutical dosage forms.
• An understanding of the steps involved in sample preparation and extraction as well as
an understanding of the drug, dosage form, and diluent properties that impact sample
preparation is critical in developing an adequate method.

Introduction
• Accurate analytical data are critical in the pharmaceutical industry to ensure the quality
and safety of the product.
• During drug development, this information is used to evaluate and select formulations
for use in toxicology and clinical studies, to assess manufacturing processes and to
assess the suitability and stability of clinical supplies.
• For marketed products, analytical data are used to evaluate the suitability and stability of
the commercial product.
• Sample preparation is an integral part of the analytical method.
• Approximately two-thirds of the time spent testing and analyzing samples was spent on
the sample preparation portion of the method. In addition, issues related to sample
preparation accounted for one-third of the errors generated while performing an
analytical method.

Challenges & Requirements
Sample preparation and extraction challenges and requirements for dosage
forms include
(1)achieving complete extraction of the drug and impurities without causing
degradation;
(2)using reasonable sample preparation methods and conditions (e.g., reasonable
in terms of time, effort, and solvents);
(3)Final prepared samples must be compatible with the analysis method;
(4)method must be rugged and robust enough to meet its intended purpose;
(5)meeting the time and resource constraints in developing the sample preparation
method.

The general steps of sample analysis of a drug
product:
• Sampling of Analytical Sample from Drug product
batch.
• Sample preparation
• Analysis of the sample by appropriate technique
(e.g., chromatography, spectroscopy, titration)
• Data are available for analysis, interpretation, and
decision making
Sampling

Sample preparation may include any of the following steps:
• disintegration/dispersion,
• particle size reduction (e.g., milling, grinding, homogenization),
• extraction and solubilization of the analytes of interest,
• derivatization,
• concentration,
• clean-up (e.g., remove interferences) and
• clarification (e.g., filtration to remove insoluble materials).
The sample preparation steps required depend on the dosage form type and the end analysis technique.

Common Instrumental Methods and the Necessary Sample Preparation
Steps Prior to Analysis

Sample preparation may include any of the following steps:

Impacting variables
Key API, diluent and dosage form
properties that impact the
(a) dosage form dispersion and
(b) drug solubilization steps in
sample preparation.

Impacting variables
Key parameters in sample preparation method develop that impact
(a) solubilization of drug from dosage forms (e.g., non-solution dosage forms) and
(b) dispersion of dosage forms (e.g., solid oral dosage forms)

Impacting variables
A number of variables that can impact sample preparation. These can be
associated with the following:
• Manufacturing conditions used to produce the product (e.g., blending time, dryer temperature,
compression force)
• Material properties of the dosage form or components of the dosage form (e.g., API particle size
distribution, film-coat thickness, tablet hardness)
• Equipment used for sample preparation (e.g., shakers, sonicators, flasks)
• Settings on equipment or process steps (e.g., shaker speed, sonication time, number of
inversions)
• People (e.g., degree of training, experience with a specific technique, clarity of written
procedures)
• Laboratory environment (e.g., light, temperature, humidity)

Disintegration / Dispersion

• Dispersion or disintegration can be defined as the breakup of the dosage form into smaller
particles or granules when in contact with a liquid.
• If disintegration or dispersion does not occur, the drug will not be efficiently or completely
extracted from the dosage form.
• The disintegration and dispersion process is influenced by properties of the dosage form
and the extraction diluent.
• Dosage form factors that impact disintegration or dispersion include dosage form type,
excipients used in the formulation, manufacturing process, and other factors (e.g.,
hardness/porosity for tablets).
• For immediate release and orally dispersive tablet formulations, disintegration occurs when
the tablet is exposed to water due to the properties of the disintegrant in the formulation.

• Reagents Commonly Used in Metal Sample Dissolution or Digestion by AAS or ICP-MS

Factors That Impact Disintegration and Dispersion
• Solvent Properties (e.g., surface tension, viscosity, solid–liquid contact angle).
After the surface of the tablet is wetted, capillarity may occur in the tablet pores. Capillarity is the
spontaneous movement of a liquid into a capillary or narrow tube due to surface forces. The
greater the surface tension and the finer the capillary radius that exists, the higher the liquid will
rise in the capillary.
• Dosage Form Properties (e.g., immediate release tablets, orally dispersive tablets)
Solid oral dosage forms can be dispersed by finding a suitable diluent (e.g., water for immediate
release tablets, other diluents for controlled release tablets). For capsule formulations, the
capsule shell can be removed or conditions can be found to dissolve or rupture the capsule. For
non-disintegrating solid oral dosage forms such as sustained or controlled release tablets, an
appropriate solvent needs to be identified to disperse the tablet.
Alternatively, mechanical means such as grinding or milling can be used to disperse tablet
dosage forms.

• Most immediate release tablet formulations contain disintegrants, which play a critical role
in the tablet disintegration process.
• Disintegrants appear to function by several different mechanisms, with each disintegrant
type having a dominant mechanism or a combination of mechanisms. The two most
commonly referenced mechanisms are wicking/capillary action and swelling.
• Wicking or capillary action is the ability of the disintegrant to draw water up into the porous
network of the tablet.
• The swelling mechanism involves the swelling of the disintegrant after water uptake.

Agitation Techniques

• Techniques used to facilitate disintegration or dispersion of dosage forms.
• Shaking, stirring, vortexing, and sonication are common agitation techniques used to
facilitate dispersion, mixing, and extraction of drug from various types of dosage forms.
• In many cases, particle size reduction techniques are used to increase the speed and
efficiency of dosage form disintegration or dispersion.
• These techniques include grinding, milling or blending, homogenization, and sonication.

• Agitation is used to facilitate dispersion, mixing, and extraction of drug from various types
of dosage forms.
• For dosage forms such as solutions and suspensions, agitation may be used to mix the
dosage form with diluent to extract the drug or make the sample solution compatible with
the analysis technique.
• For semisolid and solid dosage forms, agitation is used to disperse or disintegrate the
dosage and extract the drug, although in some cases particle size reduction techniques
may also be required.
• Agitation is also important to ensure a homogenous sample solution prior to analysis.
• Agitation of the sample solution can be performed in a number of ways and the more
common techniques include shaking, stirring, vortexing, and sonication.

Shaking
• Shaking sample solutions is a common practice in preparing samples of pharmaceutical
dosage forms.
• Shaking may be performed manually or by using a mechanical shaker.
• Mechanical shakers have the advantage over manual shaking in the ability to shake
multiple samples at a consistent speed.
• Sample preparation methods using mechanical shaking typically specify a speed (rpm:
revolutions per minute; opm: oscillations per minute or cycles per minute) and time.

Shaking
• Reciprocating shaker: Samples are placed on a platform that is moved in a backand-forth motion to mix the
sample solutions.
• Orbital shaker: Samples are placed on a platform that is moved in a circular orbit to mix the sample solutions.
• Reciprocating orbital shaker or dual-action shaker: Samples are placed on a platform that is moved in both
an orbital and reciprocating motion.
• Wrist-action® shaker: Samples are held in place on a horizontal rod and the flasks are moved in a motion that
mimics the side-to-side action of hand mixing. The shaking amplitude and speed can be adjusted.
• Rotating shaker: Samples are spun at adjustable angles.
• Rocking shaker: Samples are placed on a platform that rocks in a “see-saw” motion.
• Water bath shakers: Samples are placed on a platform inside a water bath for agitation at a controlled
temperature.

Shaking
Reciprocating Shaker
Water bath orbital shaker
Wrist-action® shaker
Incubated stackable
orbital shakers

Stirring
• A magnetic stirrer contains an electric motor that spins a magnet that is under a chemical
resistant flat surface.
• Alternatively, a set of stationary electromagnets may be used to create a rotating magnetic
field.
• A flask containing the sample, diluent, and a magnetic stir bar is placed on the surface of
the stirrer. When the magnetic stirrer is turned on, the rotating magnetic field in the unit
causes the stir bar to spin and mix the solution.
• A stir bar retriever can be used to remove the stir bar from the solution after agitation is
complete.

Stirring
Multiposition magnetic stirrer Multiposition stirring hot plate

Vortexing
• A vortex mixer or vortexer is another instrument commonly used to mix sample solutions in
various types of containers (e.g., volumetric or Erlenmeyer flasks, beakers,test tubes,
eppendorf tubes, microwell plates).
• The vortexer has a heavy base and rubber feet to provide stability during use.
• There are fixed speed vortexers and analog vortexers that allow variable speeds (100–
3,200 rpm) for gentle to vigorous mixing of sample solutions.
• Vortexers can be set to run continuously or only when a sample container is pressed down
on the rubber cup (touch mode).

Vortexing
Vortex mixer
accessories
Vortex mixer Vortex mixer

Sonication
• Sonication, also referred to as ultrasonic extraction, can be considered both a particle size
reduction technique and an agitation technique.
• This technique is used for a variety of purposes including cleaning, mixing, dispersing,
degassing, cell disruption, and DNA shearing.
• Because of its ability to disperse, mix, and dissolve samples, it is widely used in the
sample preparation of pharmaceutical dosage forms.
• Sonication can be performed by using a sonication bath or a sonication probe or horn.
• Some sonication baths have heaters for temperature control.
• Sonication is used with intact tablets as well as dispersed tablets (e.g., crushed) and other
coarse, granular material. The sample along with diluent in a flask is placed in an
ultrasonic bath and subjected to ultrasonic radiation.

Sonication
Ultrasonic Bath
Ultrasonic horn and
processor

Sonication
• There are limitations in using a sonicator for sample preparation and extraction methods
and these include improper use of sonicators and variability in ultrasonic energy within a
given bath and between baths that may lead to method transfer and robustness issues.
• For example, when a large number of volumetric flasks are placed into an ultrasonic bath,
the energy applied to some of the samples may become too diffused to effectively
fragment the dosage form and dissolve the drug substance.
• Therefore, a sample preparation method that works well in an R&D laboratory involving the
processing of a small number of samples may fail in a QC laboratory when a much larger
number of samples are put in the same type of ultrasonic bath.

Sonication
A number of factors affect sonication: surface tension of the solvent (addition of a small amount
of surfactant increases cavitation), temperature of the bath, ultrasonic frequency (20 vs. 40
kHz), power input, container position in the bath, level of solution in the bath, load in the bath
(number of containers, size/shape of containers), and particulates in the solution in the bath.
Recovery results for a tablet
formulation using two different
diluents and two different
sonication baths

Sonication
• Many laboratories fill a sonication bath with only 1/2–1 in. of water and place the sample
container on the bottom of the bath to increase sonication intensity . These practices can
adversely affect the bath performance (e.g., affect the system frequency and effectiveness)
and components (e.g., cause overheating and decrease the life-time of heaters and
transducers) and may lead to method robustness issues and variability between baths.
• Recommendations by Branson (Branson Ultrasonics Corporation 2000) for effectively using a
sonication bath include the following points:
• Operate only when liquid (water, not solvents) is in the bath. Fill the bath to the recommended level
with sample containers and trays already in the bath. If the bath is not filled to the appropriate level,
this will affect the system frequency leading to decreased effectiveness and potential damage to the
unit (e.g., protects heaters and transducers from overheating).

Sonication
• Frequently change the solution in the bath. Solutions that become contaminated with
particles that settle on the bottom of the bath will decrease ultrasonic activity.
• Do not place sample containers directly on the bottom of the bath. Containers on the bottom
of the bath will decrease cavitation and will damage the transducer because they reflect the
ultrasonic energy back to the transducer.
• Containers should be placed in an open mesh basket or in an insert tray or be suspended in
the solution to position the container in the optimal zone of the bath and to allow the
ultrasonic waves to penetrate around the containers.
• Degas the solution in the bath by sonicating for 5–10 min to enhance cavitation prior to
sonicating samples.

Sonication
• Sonication often results in heating of sample solutions. If using volumetric flasks, sonicated
sample solutions should be allowed to cool to room temperature before they are diluted to
volume. Since sonication induces localized areas of high temperature, this may adversely
affect thermally labile compounds.
• An increase in temperature and loss of solvent due to evaporation was also observed at
some conditions.

Particle Size Reduction
Techniques

Particle Size Reduction Techniques
• Many of the traditional “shake flask” extraction techniques work well for dosage forms such
as immediate release tablets, suspensions, powders for oral suspension and lyophiles. In
these cases, diluent can be added to the sample and the sample solution can be agitated
(e.g., shaking, stirring) to extract and dissolve the drug substance.
• Agitation alone is typically not sufficient to disperse nondisintegrating dosage forms, such
as extended release tablets. In these cases, several techniques are available to
mechanically disperse solid samples such as nondisintegrating tablet formulations or tablet
formulations that do not disintegrate readily.

Grinding
• Grinding, which relies on pressure and friction, is a commonly used technique to disperse
and reduce the particle size of solid dosage forms down to a fineness of approximately 10-
mm diameter.
• Manual grinding is commonly performed using a mortar and pestle and this is one of the
oldest ways of preparing samples for a composite assay of pharmaceutical tablets.
• Mortars and pestles made from different materials (e.g., porcelain, agate, glass) are
available and grinding is typically performed dry (without water or solvent) but can also be
performed wet (with water or solvent).
• In some cases, crushing samples instead of grinding them to a fine powder is sufficient to
improve recovery of the drug.
• Manual grinding is simple, but can be labor-intensive for high numbers of samples and
lead to analyst-to-analyst variability in the grinding technique.

Grinding
Example of mechanical mortar
grinder
Mortar and Pestle

Milling or Blending
• Samples may be milled or dispersed using various types of mills, such as ball mills, freezer
mills, and knife mills or blenders, to obtain submicron particle sizes.
• Ball mills use impact and friction to pulverize hard, medium-hard, and brittle samples to
approximately 10-mm-sized particles. The sample and single or multiple balls made from
stainless steel or other materials (e.g., Teflon) are placed in the milling chamber.
• The milling chamber is then mechanically shaken, rotated, or vibrated. The ball(s) impact
and pulverize the sample against the side of the milling chamber.
• Milling can be done dry or with solvent in the milling chamber.
• Heat may be generated during milling and is a potential concern for thermally labile
compounds.

Milling or Blending
Ball mill with milling chambers and balls

Knife Mills and Blenders
• Knife mills use blades and a cutting mechanism to mill samples that are not amenable to
grinding or ball milling, such as sugar or gelatin-coated tablets or samples with high fat, oil,
or moisture content that tend to clump during grinding or ball milling.
• Knife mills reduce sample particle size down to a fineness of approximately 300 mm or
less and homogenize samples in a few seconds to a few minutes.
Knife mill
• Blenders also use blades and a cutting mechanism to reduce
samples to smaller particle size.

Freezer Mills
• Cryogenic or freezer mills use impact and friction to mill samples that are difficult to
pulverize at room temperature by milling them in the presence of liquid nitrogen.
• Freezing samples in liquid nitrogen will make malleable or elastic samples brittle and
amenable to pulverization.
• Freezing thermally labile samples will prevent or minimize degradation of thermally labile
samples during milling and will also preserve volatile components in the sample.
Freezer mill
• Samples are placed in the milling chamber along with a metal
ball or rod (i.e., impactor) and the milling chamber is placed in
liquid nitrogen within the freezer mill. After the sample is
chilled (10–15 min), milling begins.

Homogenization
• Homogenization is a technique that breaks down a sample into smaller parts and blends
them to make them more uniform in texture and consistency.
• High sheer homogenizers, use a set of rotating blades (rotor and stator) with speeds up to
40,000 rpm, combined with wet grinding, shredding, and shearing to break up the sample
in the presence of a diluent.
• Homogenizers also provide vigorous mixing that enhances sample contact with the
solvent, thereby facilitating sample extraction.
• Different models of handheld and small benchtop units perform homogenization in
solutions as low as 0.1 mL and up 2,500 mL.
• Homogenizer probes can vary in size and blade shape

Homogenization
Benchtop homogenizer
Examples of different size and
shape homogenizer probes.
Schematic representation of the
homogenization process

Example agitation parameters that require optimization during development
of a sample preparation method

Post-extraction Considerations

Post-extraction Considerations
• The active extraction of pharmaceutical dosage forms is complicated predominantly by the
presence of multiple excipients, each one with very different properties.
• Therefore, in most cases, these extracts need to undergo further treatment for accurate
detection and quantitation. Furthermore, the extraction procedure in itself may require
large amounts of solvent mixtures that present challenges for analyte detection in terms of
sensitivity and quantitation limit.

Some factors to consider prior to analysis of dosage forms extracts

Eliminating Insoluble Particles
• In a majority of extractions of pharmaceutical dosage forms, there are insoluble
components remaining in the extract that would make them unsuitable for immediate
quantification by an analytical system.
• Having undissolved material is not necessarily a bad situation. In fact, this might be the
desired state of a final sample extract.
• Ideally, the extraction of the active and related substances should be complete but the
matrix components (i.e., excipients) should stay in the solid state, as it is easier to remove
these undissolved components downstream.
• Eliminating undissolved material from the extracts will extend the life of consumables (i.e.,
columns, frits, internal filters, etc.), eliminate unnecessary baseline noise, and prevent
pressure build-up in the analytical system in the case of chromatographic determinations.

• As the first step, centrifugation should be considered due to its simplicity and low cost.
Sample extracts are transferred into a conical shaped tube and centrifuged at a
predetermined speed according to the size of the particles present. Centrifugation is
usually achieved in less than 10 min.

• If the particles are too fine, centrifugation might not offer the desired results and filtration
might be necessary. Filters are sometimes seen as merely a screen or a sieve, when in
reality they have a three-dimensional structure and act more like a labyrinth.
• Several considerations are important when selecting a filter:
(a) Nature of the analyte
(b) Extract solvent
(c) Extractables and leachables
(d) Pore size – based on size/amount of undissolved material and the particle size of the analytical
column

• Filter membrane selection based on analyte and solvent properties

• Filters with pore size distribution around 0.45 mm are suitable for most applications,
although high efficiency LC columns with particles of < 3 mm usually require filtration of
particles of ≤ 0.2 mm. This is especially important for the growing application of UPLC
technology.
• In many cases, the amount or size of undissolved particles necessitates filters with bigger
pore size (i.e., 1 mm) to avoid filter clogging as a first step, followed by a second filtration
with filters of decreasing pore size.
• It is important that the selected filter is validated during the validation exercise to ensure
that the active or related impurities are not lost to the filter and that no significant
interferences are generated by the selected filter.
• As part of this process, one needs to study the effect of wetting the filter prior to sample
collection. Usually the first 5 mL of the eluate are discarded to obtain acceptable and
reproducible recoveries.

Stability & Compatibility
of Sample Solution

Solution Stability
Samples under ambient conditions protected from light or under refrigerated
conditions showed no significant changes from initial.
From this example, two factors are key:
• the selection of dissolving/extraction solvent and
• isolating the mechanisms of degradation.
Solution stability data for Compound B at ambient temperature unprotected from light

Solution Stability
• It is critical to assess the stability of extracts to have a robust method and avoid transfer
issues.
• Some factors to consider are temperature, protection from light, nature of the
dissolving/extraction solvent, and the presence of excipients.
• It is also important to take into account the analyte concentration in the extracts.
• Solution stability studies should be performed on both stock solutions and subsequent
dilutions (if dilutions are necessary) as the stability issues might become more severe as
the concentration of the analyte decreases.

Some factors to consider when troubleshooting
container compatibility problems

Sources of Sample Contamination

Process flow diagram for steps associated with preparation of an
immediate release tablet for HPLC analysis

Ishikawa diagram of method factors that could potentially impact
extraction accuracy

Thank You
For “Pharma Uptoday” free newsletter write a mail to
“pharmauptoday@gmail.com”

Sample preparation techniques of solid dosage forms

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Sample preparation techniques of solid dosage forms (20)

More from Sathish Vemula (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Sample preparation techniques of solid dosage forms

Editor's Notes