Selection Balancing Act
- 1. The Selection Balancing Act: Prediction, Cost, and Legal Risks Panel:Dirk Baxter, Ph.D., Leadership FuturesDavid M. Finch, Ph.D., APT, Inc.Charles Gerhold, The Scotts Miracle-GroDavid Mayfield, Ph.D., The Home DepotDate: August 8, 2009
- 2. When designing large-scale selection systems I/O professionals are challenged with balancing the following interdependent objectives:Optimizing prediction
- 4. Reducing legal riskLegal Risk
- 5. AgendaJob Analysis and validation study data collection - Charles
- 6. Large-volume screening “tests” –found early in the selection process - choice / development / cut score– David M.
- 7. Higher fidelity/labor intensive selection tools and methods. - Dirk
- 8. Combining multiple selection methods and using various selection weighting schemes - David F. QuestionsHow has the balance of increasing prediction while lowering cost and adverse impact changed over the last 30 years?
- 9. How are I/Os presenting the need to balance these three components to Business Leaders, HR Partners, and hiring managers?
- 10. Where does the applicant fall on these three – what is the general public’s view?Thank YouDirk Baxter, Ph.D.Leadership Futureswww.LeadershipFutures.comDirk.Baxter@LeadershipFutures.com
Editor's Notes
- #4: Where do you draw the line on JA? How much information do you need, and how much information do you want for legal?