Selection process frame
Download as PPT, PDF0 likes215 views
This document summarizes the selection process and results for the Fall 2012 RCTM program across several locations in the Czech Republic. It provides data on the number of interviews conducted, the retention rate from application to interview, the number of people selected versus the number planned to be selected, the percentage of applicants who were recruited, the number of people who started long-term training, the percentage of new trainees at long-term training, and the overall retention rate as of November 25, 2012 for each location. Locations with the highest overall retention rates utilized a selection process of multiple interviews followed by assessment centers or trial periods before selecting trainees for long-term training.
Selection process frame
- 1. Fall RCTM 2012 Selection process - frame
- 2. Current # # of ppl # of of RR of % of % of Intervie RR AF newies AF selected applicants ppl at newies at newies ws Int. 25.11. re/plan recruited LTC LTC 25.11. BRNO 109 71 65% 31/26 28% 26 84% 31 100% ČB 16 14 88% 10/12 63% 7 70% 9 90% Č ZU 73 57 78% 35/37 48% 26 74% 29 83% HK 31 22 71% 17/15 55% 7 41% 13 76% KARVINÁ 38 37 97% 32/30 84% 20 63% 19 59% OLOMOUC 45 34 76% 20/24 44% 12 60% 18 90% OSTRAVA 70 51 73% 30/31 43% 19 63% 21 70% PILSEN 35 31 89% 18/28 51% 13 72% 15 83% PRAHA 145 110 76% 52/54 36% 49 94% 47 90% ZLÍN 45 37 82% 29/28 64% 25 86% 28 97%
- 3. Current # RR of # of ppl # of % of Interview RR AF % of applicants of newies AF selected ppl at newies at s Int. recruited newies 25.11. re/plan LTC LTC 25.11. Brno 109 71 65% 31/26 28% 26 84% 31 100% Zlín 45 37 82% 29 64% 25 86% 28 97%
- 4. Current # RR of # of ppl # of % of Intervie RR AF % of applicants of newies AF selected ppl at newies at ws Int. recruited newies 25.11. re/plan LTC LTC 25.11. OL 45 34 76% 20/24 44% 12 60% 18 90%
- 5. Current # RR of # of ppl # of % of Interview RR AF % of applicants of newies AF selected ppl at newies at s Int. recruited newies 25.11. re/plan LTC LTC 25.11. Č ZU 73 57 78% 35 48% 26 74% 29 83%
- 6. Current # RR of # of ppl # of % of Interview RR AF % of applicants of newies AF selected ppl at newies at s Int. recruited newies 25.11. re/plan LTC LTC 25.11. ČB 16 14 88% 10/12 63% 7 70% 9 90% Ostrava 70 51 73% 30 43% 19 63% 21 70%
- 7. Current # RR of # of ppl # of % of Intervie RR AF % of applicants of newies AF selected ppl at newies at ws Int. recruited newies 25.11. re/plan LTC LTC 25.11. Pilsen 35 31 89% 18/28 51% 13 72% 15 83% Praha 145 110 76% 52 36% 49 94% 47 90% Karviná 38 37 97% 32 84% 20 63% 19 59%
- 8. Current # RR of # of ppl # of % of Interview RR AF % of applicants of newies AF selected ppl at newies at s Int. recruited newies 25.11. re/plan LTC LTC 25.11. HK 31 22 71% 17 55% 7 41% 13 76%
- 9. Comments • Unfortunately we didn‘t track the retention rate btw interviews and AC / trial period (or vice versa), therefore we don‘t know how many people participated in the next part of the selection process • Prague and Brno have quite small RR btw AF and interviews becasue of pre-selection based on AFs (also Prague had interviews after AC)
- 10. Recommendation • 2 LCs with highest RR (0-3) (Brno 100%, Zlín 97%) used the following frame of the selection process:
- 11. • 3 LCs with RR 90% (Olomouc, Praha, ČB) Used the following frames: Olomouc: * Some newies selected after LTC
- 12. Praha: * The same frame used Pilsen (RR 83%) and Karviná (RR 59%) – I believe that the reason why Karvina has so low RR is the fact they recruited almost everybody who applied (84% of applicants)
- 13. Č eské Budě jovice * Budějky are special case, I wouln‘t recommend this frame to other LCs since it decreases quality of the selection process and lowers the RR later on (Ostrava used this as well and their RR is 70%)
Editor's Notes
- #2: Story of the shark in three tanks.