Serving Web Apps
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes10,243 views
This document compares single-page applications (SPA), server-side rendering (SSR), and static sites for serving web applications. SPA have poor SEO without additional configuration, slow initial loading times but easy scaling. SSR has fast initial loading, requires a server for deployment but routing can be complex. Static sites have good SEO, fast loading, easy deployment but lack dynamic routes without custom handling.
1 of 1
Download to read offline
More Related Content
What's hot (14)
Ad
Recently uploaded (20)
Ad
Serving Web Apps
- 1. Comparison On Various Ways To Serving Webapps SPA SSR Static Sites SEO Poor Good Good First Paint / First Contentful Paint Slow as everything still needs to be loaded first Fast Fast Deployment Static content server sufficient (S3, Netlify) Requires server (AppEngine, Lambda) Static content server sufficient (S3, Netlify) Cloud scaling Easy Complicated Easy Dynamic routes Yes Yes 404 if directly entered (need to handle this) Dev complexity No client / server rendered content awareness No PWA Easy Somewhat easy Easy