SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Chapter V
                                        Flow through Soils
We know that soil consists of voids and are interconnected. As such water flows through these pores
in soil from point of higher energy to point of lower energy, in a similar way it flows in pipes or
open channels. Assessment of rate of flow and quantity of flow are very important in many soil
engineering problems such as in filtration, flow through earthen dam, flow beneath weirs, flow into
bore wells, piping failure etc. study of flow through soil constitutes understanding one of the
important characteristic of soil.
To get into study of flow through soils we need to recall some fundamentals of flow. As we said
fluid flows from a point of higher energy to a point of lower energy. Bernoulli gives the total energy
possessed by a flowing fluid, expressed as equivalent head of water as
                                                u    v2
                                           h=      +     +z
                                               γ w 2g
Where the first term is pressure head, second term is velocity head and the third term is elevation
head and also h = total head, u = pressure, v = velocity, g = acceleration due to gravity and γw = unit
weight of water.
In soils the velocity of flow we encounter are very small that velocity head can be neglected in
comparison to other heads. As such for problems of flow through soils
                                                   u
                                              h=     +z
                                                  γw
Figure no.1 shows the relationship among pressure, elevation and total heads for the flow through
soils. The pressure head at a point is the height of the vertical column of water in the peizometer
installed at that point. The elevation head of a point is the vertical distance measured from any
arbitrary horizontal reference datum plane to the point.



                                                                                  Δh


                    uA / γw                                                       uB / γw

                    Flow
          hA
          hB


                    zA


                                                L                                           zB


                              Fig. No. 1. Energy in water during flow through soil.
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


The loss of head between points A and B can be given by
                                                ⎛u        ⎞ ⎛u          ⎞
                               Δh = h A − h B = ⎜ A + z A ⎟ − ⎜ B + z B ⎟
                                                ⎜γ        ⎟ ⎜           ⎟
                                                ⎝ w       ⎠ ⎝γw         ⎠
The head loss Δh, can be expressed in a non dimensional form as
                                                    Δh
                                                 i=
                                                    L
Where
        i = hydraulic gradient
        L= distance between points A and B, that is the length of flow over which the loss of head
        occurred.
The variation of velocity ‘v’ with the hydraulic gradient ‘i’ is as shown in figure no.2. It consists of
three zones.
    1. Laminar flow zone (zone I)
    2. Transition zone (zone II)
    3. Turbulent zone (zone III)

                            v
                                 Zone III


                                 Zone II



                                Zone I




                                                                                              i

                      Fig.No.2. Relationship between velocity of flow and hydraulic gradient

In zone I & II flow remains laminar when ‘i’ is increased, and discharge velocity bears a linear
relationship with i. At a higher hydraulic gradient the flow becomes turbulent. When ‘i’ is decreased
laminar flow exists only in zone I.
In most soils hydraulic gradients and velocities are such that laminar conditions exist. Then
                                                 vαi

Darcy’s law
Darcy’s law states that velocity of flow is directly proportional to hydraulic gradient.
Darcy, in 1856, assuming laminar flow conditions for flow through soils, gave the relationship
between discharge velocity of water through saturated soil and hydraulic gradient as
                                                 v = ki


_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   42
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


Where
                 v = discharge velocity, which is the quantity of water flowing in unit time through a
                 unit gross cross sectional area of soil at right angles to the direction of flow.
                 k = coefficient of permeability or hydraulic conductivity.
The above equation is derived by Darcy for clean sands and its applicability to wide range of other
soils is with errors.
The Darcy’s equation v, is discharge velocity and is based on gross cross sectional area. However
the actual velocity of water (known as seepage velocity and represented by vs) through the void
spaces is higher than v.

                                                                  AV VV


                                             A V
                                                                 AS    VS




                      Fig.No.3. Relationship between discharge velocity and seepage velocity

                                                   q               q
                                               v=       and v s =
                                                   A               AV
                                                     vA = v s AV
                                                    ⇒ vV = v sVV
                                                              vV v
                                                That is v s =    =
                                                              VV   n

Coefficient of permeability
The coefficient of permeability has the same unit as velocity. It can be expressed in m/sec or cm/sec.
It depends on several factors viz. fluid viscosity, pore size distribution, grain size distribution, void
ratio, roughness of mineral particles and degree of saturation.
Coefficient of permeability varies widely for different types of soils. Some typical values of
coefficients of permeability are given below in Table.No.1.

                                         Soil type         k, cm/sec
                                         Clean gravel      1.0 - 100
                                         Coarse sand       1.0 – 0.01
                                         Fine sand         0.01 – 0.001
                                         silts             0.001 – 0.00001
                                         clays             < 0.000001

                              Table.No.1. Typical values of coefficients of permeability



_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   43
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT



Laboratory determination of coefficient of permeability
Two methods are widely employed in laboratory to determine the coefficient of permeability. They
are constant head permeability test and falling head permeability test.

Constant head permeability test
A typical experimental setup is shown in figure. No 4. In this type of test, water supply at the inlet is
adjusted in such a way that the difference of head between the inlet and the outlet remains constant
during the test. After a constant flow rate is established water is collected in a graduated flask for a
known duration.


                                                                Surplus inlet

                             Overflow


                                                                          h


                                  L


                                                                                              Over
                                                                                              flow




                                 Fig.No.4. Set up for constant head permeability test

Then total volume of water collected
                                                   Q = Avt = Akit
        Where
                 Q = Volume of water collected
                 A = Cross sectional area of soil suspension
                 T = time duration over which water is collected
                                                          h
                                               Then i =
                                                          L
                                                         h
                                              ∴ Q = Ak t
                                                         L
                                                       QL
                                               ∴k =
                                                       Aht
This test is suitable for determination of coefficient of permeability of coarse grained soil.



_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   44
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


It can not be used for fine grained soils as the quantity of water collected will be very less even over
a long period of time and small error in measurement of volume of water will lead to large error in
the value of coefficient of permeability.

Falling head permeability test
A typical arrangement of equipment is shown in figure no.5. Water from a stand pipe flows through
the soil sample. The initial head difference h1 at time t = t1 is recorded and water is allowed to flow
through the soil specimen such that the final head difference at time
t = t2 is h2.


                        dh




                                                                      h2          h        h1


                    L


                                                                                                Over
                                                                                                flow




                                  Fig.No.5. Set up for falling head permeability test

Then the rate of flow of water through the specimen at any time‘t’ can be given by
                                                   h         dh
                                             q = k A = −a
                                                   L         dt
        Where
                 q = flow rate
                 a = cross sectional area of stand pipe
                 A = cross sectional area of soil specimen
                                                     aL ⎛ dh ⎞
                                            ⇒ dt =      ⎜− ⎟
                                                     Ak ⎝ h ⎠
                                                  aL       h
                                               t=     log e 1
                                                   Ak      h2
This test is suitable for the determination of coefficient of permeability of fine grained soils.


_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   45
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                      CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


Effect of temperature of water on coefficient of permeability
Coefficient of permeability is related to the properties of fluid flowing through it by the
               γw
equation k =      k
               μ
        Where
                 γw = unit weight of water
                 η = viscosity of water
                 k = absolute coefficient of permeability (L2, cm2, m2)

        Therefore
                                                 ⎛ η T ⎞⎛ γ w(T1 ) ⎞
                                                  k T1
                                               = ⎜ 2 ⎟⎜            ⎟
                                          k T2 ⎜ η T1 ⎟⎜ γ w(T2 ) ⎟
                                                 ⎝     ⎠⎝          ⎠
It is conventional to express the value of k at a temperature of 200C. We can assume γ w(T1 ) = γ w(T2 )
with in the range of temperature encountered in experimentation. Therefore
                                                                 ηT
                                                     k 200 C =    2
                                                                    k
                                                                 ηT T
                                                                        0
                                                                            C
                                                                  20

Figure. No. 6. shows the relationship between viscosity and temperature for usual range of
temperatures encountered in laboratory.
                                      1.2



                                     ηT 2

                                     ηT20




                                       1.0
                                             12          20                 30          T0C




                             Fig.No.6. Relationship between viscosity and temperature




_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   46
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT



Empirical relations for coefficient of permeability
Many researchers have proposed empirical relationships for obtaining ‘k’ from basic properties of
soil. It will be convenient to use these formulae for first approximation purposes and when the other
accurate data are not available.
Hazen (1930) proposed an empirical relation for the coefficient of permeability in the form
                                   k = cD10 (for loose, clean filter sand)
                                          2


         Where
                 k = coefficient of permeability in cm/sec.
                 c = constant that varies from 1.0 to 1.5.
                 D10 = effective size in mm.


Casagrande proposed a simple relationship for the coefficient of permeability for fine to medium
clean sand in the following form
                                             k = 1.4e 2 k 0.85
        Where
                k = Coefficient of permeability at void ratio ‘e’.
                K0.85 = Coefficient of permeability at void ratio e = 0.85.

Equivalent permeability in stratified soils
When soil is stratified the equivalent permeability will be different for flow in different directions
with respect to stratification.

Flow parallel to stratification
In this case as shown in figure no.7, water will be flowing in all the layers under same hydraulic
gradient and total rate of discharge is equal to sum of rate of discharges through all the layers.

                                                            k1                            H1


                   Flow                                     k2                       H2            H
                   Direction
                                                            k3                            H3


                                                            k4                         H4



                         Figure. No 7. Flow condition when flow is parallel to stratification

Therefore q = v.1.H = v1.1.H + v2.1.H + v3.1.H + v4.1.H + …….
Where v = average discharge velocity and v1, v2, v3… are discharge velocities through layers 1, 2, 3
….
Say kH is the equivalent coefficient of permeability and k1, k2, k3 … are coefficients of permeability
of layers 1, 2, 3 … .
Then from Darcy’s law

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   47
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                           CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


          v = kH ieq, v1 = k1i1, v2 = k2i2, v3= k3i3 …
          But ieq = i1 = i2 = i3 ……
          Therefore kHiH = k1iH1 + k2iH2 + k3iH3 + ……
          → kH = (1/H)[k1H1 + k2H2 + k3H3 + ….]
                                                              i=n

                                                              ∑k H    i       i
                                                 i.e. k H =   i =1
                                                                i=n

                                                               ∑H
                                                               i =1
                                                                          i



Flow perpendicular to stratification
In this case water will be flowing with the same velocity in all the layers and the head loss over the
stratification will be equal to summation of head lost over individual layers.


                                                                                                        h4

                                                                                  h                h3
                                                                                              h2

                                                                                        h1


    H1                         k1

     H2                        k2

    H3                         k3


     H4                        k4


                            Flow direction


                     Figure. No 8. Flow condition when flow is perpendicular to stratification
v = v1 = v2 = v3 = v4 ……..
h = h1 + h2 + h3 + ………
Where v is discharge velocity for the stratification and v1,v2,v3 … are discharge velocities in various
layers.
Then by Darcy’s law
v = kV (h/H), v1 = k1 (h1 /H1), v2 = k2 (h2 / H2), v3 = k3 (h3 / H3), …….
Obtaining values of h, h1, h2, h3 ….. from above equation and substituting it in equation for ‘h’ we
get
                                    vH v1 H 1 v 2 H 2 v3 H 3
                                         =       +        +        + .....
                                    kV       k1       k2      k3
But we know from equation for ‘v’ that
v = v1 = v2 = v3 = v4 ……..
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   48
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


                                                                                                            i=n

          H H1 H 2 H 3                                    H                                                 ∑H           i
Therefore    =    +    +    + ..... Which gives kV =                                            i.e. kV =    i =1
                                                                                                            i =n
          kV   k1   k2   k3                          H1 H 2 H 3                                                     Hi
                                                     k1
                                                        +
                                                          k2
                                                             +
                                                               k3
                                                                                                            ∑k
                                                                                                            i =1     i



Seepage through soils
The seepage case considered in the previous half of the chapter was a relatively simple one; flow
considered was one dimensional and linear that is the flow velocity was presumed constant at every
point in a cross section perpendicular to the flow line and the flow lines were also supposed to be
parallel. However in many practical situations, such as flow around a sheet pile wall, under masonry
dams and through earth dams, flow is not one dimensional but two dimensional, which means that
the velocity components in the horizontal and vertical directions vary from point within the cross
section of soil mass. Such problems are covered in this part.
The following assumptions are made.
    a) The soil is fully saturated and Darcy’s law is valid.
    b) The soil mass is homogeneous and isotropic (except special cases).
    c) Both soil grains and pore fluid are incompressible.
    d) Flow conditions do not change with time, i.e. steady state conditions exist.

Laplace equations for two dimensional flow
Consider an elemental soil block of dimensions dx, dy, and dz, as shown in figure no. 9. (dy
perpendicular to the plane of paper). Let vx, and vz be the components of discharge velocity in
horizontal and vertical directions respectively. The rate of flow into the elemental block in the
horizontal direction is equal to vxdzdy, and in the vertical direction it is vxdxdy. The rates of outflow
from the block in the horizontal and vertical directions are respectively,




                                                           ⎛      ∂v    ⎞
                               dy                          ⎜ v z + z dz ⎟dxdy
                                                           ⎝      ∂z    ⎠
                                                                                    ⎛      ∂v    ⎞
                                                                                    ⎜ v x + x dx ⎟dzdy
                                                                                    ⎝      ∂x    ⎠
             v x dzdy
                          dz



                                               dx
                                                        v z dxdy
                            Fig. No. 9. Two dimensional flow through an element of soil
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________                49
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                    CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT



                           ⎛               ⎞          ⎛              ⎞
                           ⎜ v x + ∂v x dx ⎟dzdy and ⎜ v z + ∂v z dz ⎟dxdy
                           ⎜       ∂v y ⎟             ⎜      ∂z      ⎟
                           ⎝               ⎠          ⎝              ⎠
With the assumptions made earlier total rate of inflow into element should be equal to total rate of
               ⎛      ∂v     ⎞          ⎛     ∂v  ⎞
outflow. Hence ⎜ v x + x dx ⎟dzdy + ⎜ v z + z dz ⎟dxdy - [v x dzdy + v z dxdy ] = 0
                                        ⎜         ⎟
               ⎜      ∂v y ⎠ ⎟                 ∂z
               ⎝                        ⎝         ⎠
                       ∂v x ∂v z
                      ⇒     +     = 0 ……………………………………………..(1)
                        ∂x    ∂z
From Darcy’s law, discharge velocities can be expressed as
                                                ∂h                         ∂h
                               vx = k xix = k x    and v z = k z i z = k z
                                                ∂x                         ∂z
Where kx and kz are coefficients of hydraulic conductivities in horizontal and vertical directions
respectively. Therefore equation (1) becomes
                       ∂2h      ∂2h
                   k x 2 + k z 2 = 0 ………………………………………….(2)
                       ∂x        ∂z
And for isotropic soils with respect to hydraulic conductivity i.e. kx=kz=k
                 ∂ 2h ∂ 2h
Equation (2) ⇒ 2 + 2 = 0                    …………………….…….……………(3)
                 ∂x      ∂z
Which is known as Laplace equation for flow through soil.
This same equation is used by physicists to describe flow of heat in a thermal medium and flow of
current in a conducting medium. In general, Laplace equation describes the loss of energy in any
resistive medium. The solution of above equation gives two sets of orthogonal curves known as
equipotential lines and stream lines, which describes the flow pattern and energy dissipation and
constitutes flow nets.

Flownets
                                                                    Sheet pile wall


                           H1

                                                                                      H2
                           a' A                             a b                              B       b'



                                                             c


                                                                         flow line
                                equipotential line

                           d                                                                          d'
                                                 Impervious layer


                                       Fig.No.10. Flow around a sheet pile wall
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   50
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                    CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


Consider the figure .No. 10 shown below. Sheet pile wall retains water to a height H1 on one side
and on the other side water height is H2 ( H2 < H1). So water seeps through the soil from higher level
to lower level. A water particle enters soil (pervious media) at A and flow through it along the path
shown and exits it at point B. likewise all along boundary surface aa' number of water particles will
enter pervious media and exits boundary surface bb', traveling along different paths. These path
traced by water particles are called flow paths or flow lines. Water particles enters boundary aa' with
an energy equivalent of total head of water H1 and leaves boundary bb', gradually. Along various
flow lines we can imagine / identify points having equal energy for example 0.9 (H1-H2), 0.8 (H1-
H2), 0.3 (H1-H2) … etc. the line joining these points of equal energy / potential are known as
equipotential lines.
Number of flow lines and equipotential lines can be drawn like this. A combination of families of
these equipotential and flow lines is called a flow net. The solution of Laplace equation yields
nothing but these families of curves.
Also in an isotropic medium, the hydraulic gradient has to be the steepest possible, meaning thereby
that the length of flow shall be the shortest. Thus, flow lines have to cross equipotential lines
orthogonally. The space between two adjacent flow lines is called flow path and the figure formed
on the flownet between any two adjacent flowlines and adjacent equipotential lines is referred to as
field.
Once a flow net is constructed, its graphical properties can be used in obtaining solutions for many
seepage problems such as the estimation of seepage losses from reservoirs, determination of seepage
pressures, uplift pressures below dams, etc. towards this end, flow nets are constructed such that
    a) Head lost between successive equipotentials is the same, say Δh and
    b) Quantity of flow in each of the flow path is the same, say Δq.


                                                       Δh




                                                                                 Flowline
                  Flow channel



                                                                                                Δq
                                       a
                                b
                                                                                                Δq


                       Equipotential lines                             Field



                                      Fig.No.11. Quantity of flow from flownet

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   51
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


Thus the total head lost
H = Δh x Number of equipotential drops
H = Δh(η d )
The total seepage quantity
q = Δq(η f )
According to darcy’s law v = ki and q = kiA
                           Δh           H a                  ⎛        H⎞
Therefore Δq = kiΔA = k        a.1 = k        -------------- ⎜Q Δh =      ⎟
                            b          ηd b                  ⎜
                                                             ⎝       ηd ⎟ ⎠
Therefore total seepage = q = Δq (ηf)
                                  H a       H a
                             =k        =k        ηf
                                  ηd b      ηd b
It is convenient to construct a flow net in which all the ‘fields’ in a flow net are elementary squares,
that is a = 1 . For that condition
         b
                                    ηf
                           q = kH      ………………………………………….(4)
                                    ηd
Drawing of the flow net takes several trials. While constructing the flow net, keep the boundary
conditions in mind. For the flow net shown in figure No.10 the following boundary conditions
apply.
   a) The u/s and d/s surfaces, ‘aa'’ and ‘bb'’, of the permeable layer are equipotentials.
   b) Because aa' and bb' are equipotential lines, all flow lines intersect them at right angles.
   c) The boundary of impervious layer dd', is a flow line, and so is the surface of the sheet pile
       wall acb.
   d) The equipotential lines intersect ac and dd' at right angles.

Flownets in Anisotropic soil
For anisotropic soil having hydraulic conductivity kx and kz in horizontal and vertical directions
Laplace equation takes the form
                                          ∂2h     ∂2h
                                       kx 2 + kz 2 = 0
                                          ∂x       ∂z
                                          ∂ h
                                            2
                                                    ∂ 2h
                                     ⇒         + kz 2 = 0
                                         kz 2        ∂z
                                            ∂x
                                         kx
                      kz
Substituting x ' =       x , we can express above equation as
                      kx
                            ∂ 2h      ∂ 2h
                                     + 2 = 0 …………………….……….(5)
                          ∂ ( x ' ) 2 ∂z
Equation (5) is a form similar to that of equation (3) with ‘x’ replaced by ‘x'’, which is the new
transformed coordinate. To construct the flow net, use the following procedure.
    a) Adopt a vertical scale (that is, z axis) for drawing the cross section.
    b) Adopt a horizontal scale (that is, x axis) such that horizontal scale = k z k x . (ver.scale)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________   52
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                   FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY               CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


    c) With scales adopted in steps 1 and 2, plot the vertical section through the permeable layer
       parallel to the direction of flow.
    d) Draw the flow net for the permeable layer on the section obtained from step 3, with flow
       lines intersecting equipotential lines at right angles and the elements as approximate squares.
    e) It can be transformed back to understand the actual pattern of flow.
    f) The rate of seepage per unit length can be calculated by modifying equation (4) to
                                                               ηf
                                                 q = kxkz H
                                                               ηd
Uplift pressure under hydraulic structures
Flow nets can be used to determine the uplift pressure at the base of a hydraulic structure. To
compute uplift pressure under a hydraulic structure, draw the required flow net. The pressure
diagram at the base of the weir can be obtained from the equipotential lines from which uplift force
can be calculated.

Unconfined flow

                                     0.3 BC
              B                  D        C                                     E




       H                                                        X(x,y)                  directrix



                                                                                                    Datum
             A                                                           F          H
                  Impervious Layer                                                       Horizontal filter

                                                     d


                              Fig.No.12. Flownet for flow through an earthen dam

Consider the case of a homogeneous, isotropic earth dam resting on an impermeable foundation as
shown in figure no 12. In this problem boundaries AC - an equipotential line with total head equal to
H, AF – is a boundary flow line and discharge surface FH is a boundary equipotential line with
potential equal to tail water head. Thus three boundaries are defined and the fourth one is not
defined yet. It is however, clear that this top flow line would begin at point C in a direction at right
angles to equipotential boundary AC and would end at some point, yet unknown, on the
equipotential boundary FH.
A. Casagrande (1937) suggested the use of Kozeny’s base parabola for different conditions in earth
dams. He found that in the central portion, the top flow line coincided with the base parabola. The
base parabola when continued upstream meets the water surface at the corrected entrance point D.
since actual top flow line has to begin at C at right angles to AC, a short reverse curve is drawn from
A to join the base parabola. Thus the following steps are used to sketch top flow line for earth dam
with horizontal filter as discharge face.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 53
SOIL MECHANICS- I      CHAPTER-V         FLOW THROUGH SOILS           2008-09       MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                    FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                   CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


     1. Intersection of impervious boundary and filter is taken as focus of base parabola.
     2. Point ‘D’ is marked on water surface as shown in figure.
     3. Directrix is located by striking an arc with D as centre and DF as radius to cut horizontal
         through D at E. then draw vertical through E to meet filter at H. Then EH is the directrix.
If ‘s’ is the distance from focus to the directrix and X (x,y) any point on the parabola, then
                     x 2 + y 2 = x + s ………………………………………………(6)
Point D is on this basic parabola with coordinates (d,H).
                                               ∴s = d2 + H 2 − d
                  ∴ x 2 + y 2 = x + ( d 2 + H 2 − d ………………….…………(7)
Using equation (7) points on parabola can be obtained and plotted. The short length of reverse curve
can then be sketched from point C to complete the top flow line.
Once the flow line is drawn, the rest of the flow net can be drawn with consideration of other
boundary conditions.
Seepage computations can be done using flow net as well as by the following method.
Equation (6) ⇒ y = s 2 + 2 xs differentiation of which yields
                                             dy         s
                                                 =
                                             dx      2 xs + s 2
At x = 0, dy/dx =1 and y = s
If it is assumed that the gradient of the top flow line can represent the average gradient on the
vertical, dy/dx may be used in place of dy/ds.
                                ⎛ dy ⎞
                    q = kiA = k ⎜ ⎟ y.1 …………………………………………..(8)
                                ⎝ dx ⎠
At the vertical section passing through F, dy/dx =1, x = 0 and y = s
Therefore
                  q = ks…………………………………………..……………….(9)
If the discharge face is not horizontal, a further correction at the exit surface may have to be made to
the theoretical base parabola, depending on the conditions at the toe. Angle β is used to describe the
direction of the discharge surface relative to the bottom boundary flow line. Figure No. 13 shows the
top flow line details at exit. When the exit surface is horizontal i.e. β=1800, no correction is needed
to the base parabola. When an angular rock toe forms the exit surface β=1800, a correction is made
by relocating the exit point of top flow line by the method suggested by Casagrande. For an
embankment without a drainage filter β=900, the top flow line exits tangentially along the
downstream slope. The following table no. 2 can be used to locate the actual point of exit.


                            β in degrees 30            60      90 120 150 180
                                   Δa
                                              0.36 0.32 0.26 0.18 0.10 0.00
                                a + Δa
                                                                                Δa
Note: Intermediate values can be readout from the graph plotted between β and        with the values given here.
                                                                              a + Δa

                  Table.No.2. Values of Δa for different angle of inclination of downstream slope

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________      54
SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA
HAWASSA UNIVERSITY                                 FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY                                  CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT




                                      Phreatic line                             Base parabola                                           a

                                                                                                                          Δa
                            No correction to                                    Toe filter
                                Base parabola

                β = 1800              Horizontal filter          β                                                              β

                    F                                                F                                                                         F
                                                                                    Δa
                                                                                         a

                                     Fig. No. 13. Phreatic line intersection with down stream slope / filters

   For an embankment without filter and α<300, L = (a-Δa) can be obtained by the relation
                                             d          d2      H2
                                                  −       L= −
                                           cos α      cos 2 α sin 2 α
   And the rate of seepage per unit length of dam by
                                              q = k L tanα sinα
   For α ≥ 300 Casagrande showed that
                                                    L = d 2 + H 2 − d 2 − H 2 cos 2 α and
                                                                q = kLsin2α

   Problems
       1.       Determine the equivalent coefficient of permeability of a soil stratification containing alternate ‘n’ layers of silt
                with k = 5x10-4cm/sec and ‘n+1’ layers of clay with k = 3x10-6               cm /sec for both flow parallel and
                perpendicular to the strartification.
       2.       A flownet for flow around a single row of sheet piles in a permeable soil layer is shown in figure. Given kx = kz
                = 4.2x10-3cm/sec. determine
                    a. How high (above the ground surface) the water will rise if piezometers are placed at points a, b, c, and
                        d. and
                    b. The rate of seepage through flow channel II per unit length (perpendicular to the section shown).


        5m

                                                          1.5m                                                 11m
            0                                                               6
                                                I         II             III
                                                      C                                                                   2.3
                                                                                                 2.3                            1
                        A                                                          14m       1                                                15m
                                 B

                                                                                                                                    Hor. Sand filter
                1            2           3            4              5                                 Impervious layer                 12m

       3.       The section of a homogeneous earth is shiown in figure. The coefficients of permeability in the x and y
                directions are 8x10-7 cm/sec and 3.6x10-7 respectively. Draw the flownet and estimate the seepage through the
                dam section.

***Hand outs are not meant to be exhaustive; students are advised to refer various books on the subject.
   _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________                                       55
   SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V                FLOW THROUGH SOILS               2008-09      MU JAGADEESHA

More Related Content

PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #13: Soil Compaction]
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
PDF
Consolidation nec
PPTX
Hydraulic jump location control
PDF
Lecture 6 soil permeability
PDF
LONG WALL AND SHORT WALL METHOD-6
PPTX
DEVELOPMENT OF GENERALIZED SPECIFIC ENERGY AND SPECIFIC FORCE CURVES
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #13: Soil Compaction]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Consolidation nec
Hydraulic jump location control
Lecture 6 soil permeability
LONG WALL AND SHORT WALL METHOD-6
DEVELOPMENT OF GENERALIZED SPECIFIC ENERGY AND SPECIFIC FORCE CURVES

What's hot (20)

PPT
Soil strength
PDF
17. seepage through anisotropic soil (1)
PDF
Irrigation engineering m1
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #23: Soil Permeability]
PPTX
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
PPTX
Trixial test
PPT
Cone Penetration Test
PDF
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
PPTX
PPTX
Consistency limits and its determination
PPTX
Sub soil exploration
PDF
Discharge Over a broad Crested Weir | Jameel Academy
PDF
Gravity dam stability analysis
PPTX
Consolidation settlement
PPTX
Shear strength of soil
PPT
Shrinkage Limit Test
PDF
Effect of expansive soils on buildings and its prevention
PDF
Lecture 2 bearing capacity
PDF
PDF
Bending stresses and shear stresses
Soil strength
17. seepage through anisotropic soil (1)
Irrigation engineering m1
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #23: Soil Permeability]
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Trixial test
Cone Penetration Test
Lateral earth pressure theories by abhishek sharma
Consistency limits and its determination
Sub soil exploration
Discharge Over a broad Crested Weir | Jameel Academy
Gravity dam stability analysis
Consolidation settlement
Shear strength of soil
Shrinkage Limit Test
Effect of expansive soils on buildings and its prevention
Lecture 2 bearing capacity
Bending stresses and shear stresses
Ad

Viewers also liked (6)

PDF
4 permeability and seepage
PDF
Mecdossolos ii
PDF
Flow nets
PDF
Mecanica de suelos propiedades hidraulicas del suelo
PDF
7. permeabilidad en suelossss
PDF
Soil mechanics note
4 permeability and seepage
Mecdossolos ii
Flow nets
Mecanica de suelos propiedades hidraulicas del suelo
7. permeabilidad en suelossss
Soil mechanics note
Ad

Similar to Sm Chapter V (20)

PDF
Ch5_Flow.pdf
PDF
Chapter 04
PPTX
Permeability notes for geotechnical engineering.pptx
PPT
7 - Water in Soil mechanics geotechnical engineering
PDF
Chapter-7_Permeability n.pdf(Magnetic Surveying Magnetic Surveying Instrume...
PDF
Chapter 4 Hydraulic Characteristics of Soil.pdf
PPTX
Unit 2 Flow of water through soil_2.pptx
PPT
Permeability sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
PDF
63027 09
PPT
Unit 4 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF SOIL.ppt
PDF
Permeability of Soils & Seepage Analysis
PPTX
Soil Mechanics UII Soil Water and Flow.pptx
PPTX
Permeability of a soil geotechnical engineering-1
PPT
Drainage Engineering (darcy's Law)
PDF
hydro chapter_7_groundwater_by louy Al hami
PDF
Permeability
PPTX
Principles of groundwater flow
PPTX
Chapter-03.pptx
PDF
EECQ 3171-Soil Mechanics IA Slides 77-101.pdf
PDF
L2 darcys law
 
Ch5_Flow.pdf
Chapter 04
Permeability notes for geotechnical engineering.pptx
7 - Water in Soil mechanics geotechnical engineering
Chapter-7_Permeability n.pdf(Magnetic Surveying Magnetic Surveying Instrume...
Chapter 4 Hydraulic Characteristics of Soil.pdf
Unit 2 Flow of water through soil_2.pptx
Permeability sivakugan (Complete Soil Mech. Undestanding Pakage: ABHAY)
63027 09
Unit 4 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF SOIL.ppt
Permeability of Soils & Seepage Analysis
Soil Mechanics UII Soil Water and Flow.pptx
Permeability of a soil geotechnical engineering-1
Drainage Engineering (darcy's Law)
hydro chapter_7_groundwater_by louy Al hami
Permeability
Principles of groundwater flow
Chapter-03.pptx
EECQ 3171-Soil Mechanics IA Slides 77-101.pdf
L2 darcys law
 

More from jagadeesha M U (7)

PDF
Sm Chapter VII
PDF
Sm Chapter VI
PDF
Sm Chapter IV
PDF
Sm Chapter III
PDF
Geotechnical Engineering I Co
PDF
Sm Chapter II
PDF
Sm Chapter I
Sm Chapter VII
Sm Chapter VI
Sm Chapter IV
Sm Chapter III
Geotechnical Engineering I Co
Sm Chapter II
Sm Chapter I

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PPTX
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PDF
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
PDF
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
A comparative analysis of optical character recognition models for extracting...
PDF
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
PDF
Mushroom cultivation and it's methods.pdf
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PPTX
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
Teaching material agriculture food technology
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
Profit Center Accounting in SAP S/4HANA, S4F28 Col11
MIND Revenue Release Quarter 2 2025 Press Release
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
A comparative analysis of optical character recognition models for extracting...
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
Mushroom cultivation and it's methods.pdf
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Spectroscopy.pptx food analysis technology

Sm Chapter V

  • 1. Chapter V Flow through Soils We know that soil consists of voids and are interconnected. As such water flows through these pores in soil from point of higher energy to point of lower energy, in a similar way it flows in pipes or open channels. Assessment of rate of flow and quantity of flow are very important in many soil engineering problems such as in filtration, flow through earthen dam, flow beneath weirs, flow into bore wells, piping failure etc. study of flow through soil constitutes understanding one of the important characteristic of soil. To get into study of flow through soils we need to recall some fundamentals of flow. As we said fluid flows from a point of higher energy to a point of lower energy. Bernoulli gives the total energy possessed by a flowing fluid, expressed as equivalent head of water as u v2 h= + +z γ w 2g Where the first term is pressure head, second term is velocity head and the third term is elevation head and also h = total head, u = pressure, v = velocity, g = acceleration due to gravity and γw = unit weight of water. In soils the velocity of flow we encounter are very small that velocity head can be neglected in comparison to other heads. As such for problems of flow through soils u h= +z γw Figure no.1 shows the relationship among pressure, elevation and total heads for the flow through soils. The pressure head at a point is the height of the vertical column of water in the peizometer installed at that point. The elevation head of a point is the vertical distance measured from any arbitrary horizontal reference datum plane to the point. Δh uA / γw uB / γw Flow hA hB zA L zB Fig. No. 1. Energy in water during flow through soil.
  • 2. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The loss of head between points A and B can be given by ⎛u ⎞ ⎛u ⎞ Δh = h A − h B = ⎜ A + z A ⎟ − ⎜ B + z B ⎟ ⎜γ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ w ⎠ ⎝γw ⎠ The head loss Δh, can be expressed in a non dimensional form as Δh i= L Where i = hydraulic gradient L= distance between points A and B, that is the length of flow over which the loss of head occurred. The variation of velocity ‘v’ with the hydraulic gradient ‘i’ is as shown in figure no.2. It consists of three zones. 1. Laminar flow zone (zone I) 2. Transition zone (zone II) 3. Turbulent zone (zone III) v Zone III Zone II Zone I i Fig.No.2. Relationship between velocity of flow and hydraulic gradient In zone I & II flow remains laminar when ‘i’ is increased, and discharge velocity bears a linear relationship with i. At a higher hydraulic gradient the flow becomes turbulent. When ‘i’ is decreased laminar flow exists only in zone I. In most soils hydraulic gradients and velocities are such that laminar conditions exist. Then vαi Darcy’s law Darcy’s law states that velocity of flow is directly proportional to hydraulic gradient. Darcy, in 1856, assuming laminar flow conditions for flow through soils, gave the relationship between discharge velocity of water through saturated soil and hydraulic gradient as v = ki _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 42 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 3. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Where v = discharge velocity, which is the quantity of water flowing in unit time through a unit gross cross sectional area of soil at right angles to the direction of flow. k = coefficient of permeability or hydraulic conductivity. The above equation is derived by Darcy for clean sands and its applicability to wide range of other soils is with errors. The Darcy’s equation v, is discharge velocity and is based on gross cross sectional area. However the actual velocity of water (known as seepage velocity and represented by vs) through the void spaces is higher than v. AV VV A V AS VS Fig.No.3. Relationship between discharge velocity and seepage velocity q q v= and v s = A AV vA = v s AV ⇒ vV = v sVV vV v That is v s = = VV n Coefficient of permeability The coefficient of permeability has the same unit as velocity. It can be expressed in m/sec or cm/sec. It depends on several factors viz. fluid viscosity, pore size distribution, grain size distribution, void ratio, roughness of mineral particles and degree of saturation. Coefficient of permeability varies widely for different types of soils. Some typical values of coefficients of permeability are given below in Table.No.1. Soil type k, cm/sec Clean gravel 1.0 - 100 Coarse sand 1.0 – 0.01 Fine sand 0.01 – 0.001 silts 0.001 – 0.00001 clays < 0.000001 Table.No.1. Typical values of coefficients of permeability _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 43 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 4. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Laboratory determination of coefficient of permeability Two methods are widely employed in laboratory to determine the coefficient of permeability. They are constant head permeability test and falling head permeability test. Constant head permeability test A typical experimental setup is shown in figure. No 4. In this type of test, water supply at the inlet is adjusted in such a way that the difference of head between the inlet and the outlet remains constant during the test. After a constant flow rate is established water is collected in a graduated flask for a known duration. Surplus inlet Overflow h L Over flow Fig.No.4. Set up for constant head permeability test Then total volume of water collected Q = Avt = Akit Where Q = Volume of water collected A = Cross sectional area of soil suspension T = time duration over which water is collected h Then i = L h ∴ Q = Ak t L QL ∴k = Aht This test is suitable for determination of coefficient of permeability of coarse grained soil. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 44 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 5. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT It can not be used for fine grained soils as the quantity of water collected will be very less even over a long period of time and small error in measurement of volume of water will lead to large error in the value of coefficient of permeability. Falling head permeability test A typical arrangement of equipment is shown in figure no.5. Water from a stand pipe flows through the soil sample. The initial head difference h1 at time t = t1 is recorded and water is allowed to flow through the soil specimen such that the final head difference at time t = t2 is h2. dh h2 h h1 L Over flow Fig.No.5. Set up for falling head permeability test Then the rate of flow of water through the specimen at any time‘t’ can be given by h dh q = k A = −a L dt Where q = flow rate a = cross sectional area of stand pipe A = cross sectional area of soil specimen aL ⎛ dh ⎞ ⇒ dt = ⎜− ⎟ Ak ⎝ h ⎠ aL h t= log e 1 Ak h2 This test is suitable for the determination of coefficient of permeability of fine grained soils. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 45 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 6. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Effect of temperature of water on coefficient of permeability Coefficient of permeability is related to the properties of fluid flowing through it by the γw equation k = k μ Where γw = unit weight of water η = viscosity of water k = absolute coefficient of permeability (L2, cm2, m2) Therefore ⎛ η T ⎞⎛ γ w(T1 ) ⎞ k T1 = ⎜ 2 ⎟⎜ ⎟ k T2 ⎜ η T1 ⎟⎜ γ w(T2 ) ⎟ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠ It is conventional to express the value of k at a temperature of 200C. We can assume γ w(T1 ) = γ w(T2 ) with in the range of temperature encountered in experimentation. Therefore ηT k 200 C = 2 k ηT T 0 C 20 Figure. No. 6. shows the relationship between viscosity and temperature for usual range of temperatures encountered in laboratory. 1.2 ηT 2 ηT20 1.0 12 20 30 T0C Fig.No.6. Relationship between viscosity and temperature _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 46 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 7. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Empirical relations for coefficient of permeability Many researchers have proposed empirical relationships for obtaining ‘k’ from basic properties of soil. It will be convenient to use these formulae for first approximation purposes and when the other accurate data are not available. Hazen (1930) proposed an empirical relation for the coefficient of permeability in the form k = cD10 (for loose, clean filter sand) 2 Where k = coefficient of permeability in cm/sec. c = constant that varies from 1.0 to 1.5. D10 = effective size in mm. Casagrande proposed a simple relationship for the coefficient of permeability for fine to medium clean sand in the following form k = 1.4e 2 k 0.85 Where k = Coefficient of permeability at void ratio ‘e’. K0.85 = Coefficient of permeability at void ratio e = 0.85. Equivalent permeability in stratified soils When soil is stratified the equivalent permeability will be different for flow in different directions with respect to stratification. Flow parallel to stratification In this case as shown in figure no.7, water will be flowing in all the layers under same hydraulic gradient and total rate of discharge is equal to sum of rate of discharges through all the layers. k1 H1 Flow k2 H2 H Direction k3 H3 k4 H4 Figure. No 7. Flow condition when flow is parallel to stratification Therefore q = v.1.H = v1.1.H + v2.1.H + v3.1.H + v4.1.H + ……. Where v = average discharge velocity and v1, v2, v3… are discharge velocities through layers 1, 2, 3 …. Say kH is the equivalent coefficient of permeability and k1, k2, k3 … are coefficients of permeability of layers 1, 2, 3 … . Then from Darcy’s law _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 47 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 8. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT v = kH ieq, v1 = k1i1, v2 = k2i2, v3= k3i3 … But ieq = i1 = i2 = i3 …… Therefore kHiH = k1iH1 + k2iH2 + k3iH3 + …… → kH = (1/H)[k1H1 + k2H2 + k3H3 + ….] i=n ∑k H i i i.e. k H = i =1 i=n ∑H i =1 i Flow perpendicular to stratification In this case water will be flowing with the same velocity in all the layers and the head loss over the stratification will be equal to summation of head lost over individual layers. h4 h h3 h2 h1 H1 k1 H2 k2 H3 k3 H4 k4 Flow direction Figure. No 8. Flow condition when flow is perpendicular to stratification v = v1 = v2 = v3 = v4 …….. h = h1 + h2 + h3 + ……… Where v is discharge velocity for the stratification and v1,v2,v3 … are discharge velocities in various layers. Then by Darcy’s law v = kV (h/H), v1 = k1 (h1 /H1), v2 = k2 (h2 / H2), v3 = k3 (h3 / H3), ……. Obtaining values of h, h1, h2, h3 ….. from above equation and substituting it in equation for ‘h’ we get vH v1 H 1 v 2 H 2 v3 H 3 = + + + ..... kV k1 k2 k3 But we know from equation for ‘v’ that v = v1 = v2 = v3 = v4 …….. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 48 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 9. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT i=n H H1 H 2 H 3 H ∑H i Therefore = + + + ..... Which gives kV = i.e. kV = i =1 i =n kV k1 k2 k3 H1 H 2 H 3 Hi k1 + k2 + k3 ∑k i =1 i Seepage through soils The seepage case considered in the previous half of the chapter was a relatively simple one; flow considered was one dimensional and linear that is the flow velocity was presumed constant at every point in a cross section perpendicular to the flow line and the flow lines were also supposed to be parallel. However in many practical situations, such as flow around a sheet pile wall, under masonry dams and through earth dams, flow is not one dimensional but two dimensional, which means that the velocity components in the horizontal and vertical directions vary from point within the cross section of soil mass. Such problems are covered in this part. The following assumptions are made. a) The soil is fully saturated and Darcy’s law is valid. b) The soil mass is homogeneous and isotropic (except special cases). c) Both soil grains and pore fluid are incompressible. d) Flow conditions do not change with time, i.e. steady state conditions exist. Laplace equations for two dimensional flow Consider an elemental soil block of dimensions dx, dy, and dz, as shown in figure no. 9. (dy perpendicular to the plane of paper). Let vx, and vz be the components of discharge velocity in horizontal and vertical directions respectively. The rate of flow into the elemental block in the horizontal direction is equal to vxdzdy, and in the vertical direction it is vxdxdy. The rates of outflow from the block in the horizontal and vertical directions are respectively, ⎛ ∂v ⎞ dy ⎜ v z + z dz ⎟dxdy ⎝ ∂z ⎠ ⎛ ∂v ⎞ ⎜ v x + x dx ⎟dzdy ⎝ ∂x ⎠ v x dzdy dz dx v z dxdy Fig. No. 9. Two dimensional flow through an element of soil _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 49 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 10. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ v x + ∂v x dx ⎟dzdy and ⎜ v z + ∂v z dz ⎟dxdy ⎜ ∂v y ⎟ ⎜ ∂z ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ With the assumptions made earlier total rate of inflow into element should be equal to total rate of ⎛ ∂v ⎞ ⎛ ∂v ⎞ outflow. Hence ⎜ v x + x dx ⎟dzdy + ⎜ v z + z dz ⎟dxdy - [v x dzdy + v z dxdy ] = 0 ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ∂v y ⎠ ⎟ ∂z ⎝ ⎝ ⎠ ∂v x ∂v z ⇒ + = 0 ……………………………………………..(1) ∂x ∂z From Darcy’s law, discharge velocities can be expressed as ∂h ∂h vx = k xix = k x and v z = k z i z = k z ∂x ∂z Where kx and kz are coefficients of hydraulic conductivities in horizontal and vertical directions respectively. Therefore equation (1) becomes ∂2h ∂2h k x 2 + k z 2 = 0 ………………………………………….(2) ∂x ∂z And for isotropic soils with respect to hydraulic conductivity i.e. kx=kz=k ∂ 2h ∂ 2h Equation (2) ⇒ 2 + 2 = 0 …………………….…….……………(3) ∂x ∂z Which is known as Laplace equation for flow through soil. This same equation is used by physicists to describe flow of heat in a thermal medium and flow of current in a conducting medium. In general, Laplace equation describes the loss of energy in any resistive medium. The solution of above equation gives two sets of orthogonal curves known as equipotential lines and stream lines, which describes the flow pattern and energy dissipation and constitutes flow nets. Flownets Sheet pile wall H1 H2 a' A a b B b' c flow line equipotential line d d' Impervious layer Fig.No.10. Flow around a sheet pile wall _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 50 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 11. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Consider the figure .No. 10 shown below. Sheet pile wall retains water to a height H1 on one side and on the other side water height is H2 ( H2 < H1). So water seeps through the soil from higher level to lower level. A water particle enters soil (pervious media) at A and flow through it along the path shown and exits it at point B. likewise all along boundary surface aa' number of water particles will enter pervious media and exits boundary surface bb', traveling along different paths. These path traced by water particles are called flow paths or flow lines. Water particles enters boundary aa' with an energy equivalent of total head of water H1 and leaves boundary bb', gradually. Along various flow lines we can imagine / identify points having equal energy for example 0.9 (H1-H2), 0.8 (H1- H2), 0.3 (H1-H2) … etc. the line joining these points of equal energy / potential are known as equipotential lines. Number of flow lines and equipotential lines can be drawn like this. A combination of families of these equipotential and flow lines is called a flow net. The solution of Laplace equation yields nothing but these families of curves. Also in an isotropic medium, the hydraulic gradient has to be the steepest possible, meaning thereby that the length of flow shall be the shortest. Thus, flow lines have to cross equipotential lines orthogonally. The space between two adjacent flow lines is called flow path and the figure formed on the flownet between any two adjacent flowlines and adjacent equipotential lines is referred to as field. Once a flow net is constructed, its graphical properties can be used in obtaining solutions for many seepage problems such as the estimation of seepage losses from reservoirs, determination of seepage pressures, uplift pressures below dams, etc. towards this end, flow nets are constructed such that a) Head lost between successive equipotentials is the same, say Δh and b) Quantity of flow in each of the flow path is the same, say Δq. Δh Flowline Flow channel Δq a b Δq Equipotential lines Field Fig.No.11. Quantity of flow from flownet _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 51 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 12. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Thus the total head lost H = Δh x Number of equipotential drops H = Δh(η d ) The total seepage quantity q = Δq(η f ) According to darcy’s law v = ki and q = kiA Δh H a ⎛ H⎞ Therefore Δq = kiΔA = k a.1 = k -------------- ⎜Q Δh = ⎟ b ηd b ⎜ ⎝ ηd ⎟ ⎠ Therefore total seepage = q = Δq (ηf) H a H a =k =k ηf ηd b ηd b It is convenient to construct a flow net in which all the ‘fields’ in a flow net are elementary squares, that is a = 1 . For that condition b ηf q = kH ………………………………………….(4) ηd Drawing of the flow net takes several trials. While constructing the flow net, keep the boundary conditions in mind. For the flow net shown in figure No.10 the following boundary conditions apply. a) The u/s and d/s surfaces, ‘aa'’ and ‘bb'’, of the permeable layer are equipotentials. b) Because aa' and bb' are equipotential lines, all flow lines intersect them at right angles. c) The boundary of impervious layer dd', is a flow line, and so is the surface of the sheet pile wall acb. d) The equipotential lines intersect ac and dd' at right angles. Flownets in Anisotropic soil For anisotropic soil having hydraulic conductivity kx and kz in horizontal and vertical directions Laplace equation takes the form ∂2h ∂2h kx 2 + kz 2 = 0 ∂x ∂z ∂ h 2 ∂ 2h ⇒ + kz 2 = 0 kz 2 ∂z ∂x kx kz Substituting x ' = x , we can express above equation as kx ∂ 2h ∂ 2h + 2 = 0 …………………….……….(5) ∂ ( x ' ) 2 ∂z Equation (5) is a form similar to that of equation (3) with ‘x’ replaced by ‘x'’, which is the new transformed coordinate. To construct the flow net, use the following procedure. a) Adopt a vertical scale (that is, z axis) for drawing the cross section. b) Adopt a horizontal scale (that is, x axis) such that horizontal scale = k z k x . (ver.scale) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 52 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 13. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT c) With scales adopted in steps 1 and 2, plot the vertical section through the permeable layer parallel to the direction of flow. d) Draw the flow net for the permeable layer on the section obtained from step 3, with flow lines intersecting equipotential lines at right angles and the elements as approximate squares. e) It can be transformed back to understand the actual pattern of flow. f) The rate of seepage per unit length can be calculated by modifying equation (4) to ηf q = kxkz H ηd Uplift pressure under hydraulic structures Flow nets can be used to determine the uplift pressure at the base of a hydraulic structure. To compute uplift pressure under a hydraulic structure, draw the required flow net. The pressure diagram at the base of the weir can be obtained from the equipotential lines from which uplift force can be calculated. Unconfined flow 0.3 BC B D C E H X(x,y) directrix Datum A F H Impervious Layer Horizontal filter d Fig.No.12. Flownet for flow through an earthen dam Consider the case of a homogeneous, isotropic earth dam resting on an impermeable foundation as shown in figure no 12. In this problem boundaries AC - an equipotential line with total head equal to H, AF – is a boundary flow line and discharge surface FH is a boundary equipotential line with potential equal to tail water head. Thus three boundaries are defined and the fourth one is not defined yet. It is however, clear that this top flow line would begin at point C in a direction at right angles to equipotential boundary AC and would end at some point, yet unknown, on the equipotential boundary FH. A. Casagrande (1937) suggested the use of Kozeny’s base parabola for different conditions in earth dams. He found that in the central portion, the top flow line coincided with the base parabola. The base parabola when continued upstream meets the water surface at the corrected entrance point D. since actual top flow line has to begin at C at right angles to AC, a short reverse curve is drawn from A to join the base parabola. Thus the following steps are used to sketch top flow line for earth dam with horizontal filter as discharge face. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 53 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 14. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Intersection of impervious boundary and filter is taken as focus of base parabola. 2. Point ‘D’ is marked on water surface as shown in figure. 3. Directrix is located by striking an arc with D as centre and DF as radius to cut horizontal through D at E. then draw vertical through E to meet filter at H. Then EH is the directrix. If ‘s’ is the distance from focus to the directrix and X (x,y) any point on the parabola, then x 2 + y 2 = x + s ………………………………………………(6) Point D is on this basic parabola with coordinates (d,H). ∴s = d2 + H 2 − d ∴ x 2 + y 2 = x + ( d 2 + H 2 − d ………………….…………(7) Using equation (7) points on parabola can be obtained and plotted. The short length of reverse curve can then be sketched from point C to complete the top flow line. Once the flow line is drawn, the rest of the flow net can be drawn with consideration of other boundary conditions. Seepage computations can be done using flow net as well as by the following method. Equation (6) ⇒ y = s 2 + 2 xs differentiation of which yields dy s = dx 2 xs + s 2 At x = 0, dy/dx =1 and y = s If it is assumed that the gradient of the top flow line can represent the average gradient on the vertical, dy/dx may be used in place of dy/ds. ⎛ dy ⎞ q = kiA = k ⎜ ⎟ y.1 …………………………………………..(8) ⎝ dx ⎠ At the vertical section passing through F, dy/dx =1, x = 0 and y = s Therefore q = ks…………………………………………..……………….(9) If the discharge face is not horizontal, a further correction at the exit surface may have to be made to the theoretical base parabola, depending on the conditions at the toe. Angle β is used to describe the direction of the discharge surface relative to the bottom boundary flow line. Figure No. 13 shows the top flow line details at exit. When the exit surface is horizontal i.e. β=1800, no correction is needed to the base parabola. When an angular rock toe forms the exit surface β=1800, a correction is made by relocating the exit point of top flow line by the method suggested by Casagrande. For an embankment without a drainage filter β=900, the top flow line exits tangentially along the downstream slope. The following table no. 2 can be used to locate the actual point of exit. β in degrees 30 60 90 120 150 180 Δa 0.36 0.32 0.26 0.18 0.10 0.00 a + Δa Δa Note: Intermediate values can be readout from the graph plotted between β and with the values given here. a + Δa Table.No.2. Values of Δa for different angle of inclination of downstream slope _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 54 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA
  • 15. HAWASSA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF TECHNOLOGY CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Phreatic line Base parabola a Δa No correction to Toe filter Base parabola β = 1800 Horizontal filter β β F F F Δa a Fig. No. 13. Phreatic line intersection with down stream slope / filters For an embankment without filter and α<300, L = (a-Δa) can be obtained by the relation d d2 H2 − L= − cos α cos 2 α sin 2 α And the rate of seepage per unit length of dam by q = k L tanα sinα For α ≥ 300 Casagrande showed that L = d 2 + H 2 − d 2 − H 2 cos 2 α and q = kLsin2α Problems 1. Determine the equivalent coefficient of permeability of a soil stratification containing alternate ‘n’ layers of silt with k = 5x10-4cm/sec and ‘n+1’ layers of clay with k = 3x10-6 cm /sec for both flow parallel and perpendicular to the strartification. 2. A flownet for flow around a single row of sheet piles in a permeable soil layer is shown in figure. Given kx = kz = 4.2x10-3cm/sec. determine a. How high (above the ground surface) the water will rise if piezometers are placed at points a, b, c, and d. and b. The rate of seepage through flow channel II per unit length (perpendicular to the section shown). 5m 1.5m 11m 0 6 I II III C 2.3 2.3 1 A 14m 1 15m B Hor. Sand filter 1 2 3 4 5 Impervious layer 12m 3. The section of a homogeneous earth is shiown in figure. The coefficients of permeability in the x and y directions are 8x10-7 cm/sec and 3.6x10-7 respectively. Draw the flownet and estimate the seepage through the dam section. ***Hand outs are not meant to be exhaustive; students are advised to refer various books on the subject. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 55 SOIL MECHANICS- I CHAPTER-V FLOW THROUGH SOILS 2008-09 MU JAGADEESHA