SpeedSummarizer Testing Results
0 likes230 views
Speed Summarizer provides automated document summaries but user feedback found the current summaries to be fragmented and unclear. The MVP focuses on business professionals and students needing to decide whether to fully read articles. Based on user input, future improvements include formatting summaries as bullet points, using an alternate API to improve quality, and making the saving and highlighting features more apparent to users.
SpeedSummarizer Testing Results
- 1. SPEED SUMMARIZER Anna Gray, Leah Bar-On Simmons, Mark Melendy
- 2. Pitch ■ Business professionals and college students ■ Decide whether to read article ■ Summaries and link for future reading
- 3. MVP2 ■
- 4. Feature Importance Satisfaction Good/Quick Summary 4.8 2.8 Change Summary Length 3.8 4.5 Store Summaries 3 4 User Feedback ● “Some of the sentences did not make complete sense” ● “Very fragmented” ● “summary by url didn’t work, used text highlight feature, but had to be told about it”
- 5. Issues and Features Issues: ■ Poor summaries ■ Successful save not obvious ■ Unclear where quotes are from New Features: ■ Format changes to bullet point summary ■ Use different API ■ Show success of save ■ Make summary by highlighted text obvious