SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Six Sigma Overview
4 Sigma Process Capability 99.38% Current Standard
6 Sigma Process Capability 99.99966% World-Class
Long-Term Yield
3 Sigma Process Capability 93.32% Historical Standard
The Classical View of Performance
• Six-Sigma is a philosophy:
• Why isn’t “99% acceptable” good enough...??
– 20,000 lost articles of mail every hour.
– 15 minutes each day of unsafe drinking water.
– 5,000 incorrect surgical procedures per week.
– 4 or more accidents per day at major airports.
– 200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year.
– 7 hours each month without electricity.
History of 6 Sigma
• 6 Sigma manufacturing philosophy came from Motorola
They recognised that sufficient process improvement would not
occur using a conventional approach to quality. It was developed
to help them reduce variation within a process by focusing effort
on improving inputs to a process rather than reacting to outputs.
• The process was failing the customer expectations
– Traditionally, processes aimed for process capability of 3 to 4
sigma (Cpk=1.0 to 1.33 or 93% to 99.3% acceptable)
– The customer received 6200 defective product per million at best
– Processes now aim for 6 sigma (Cpk=2)
– The customer would receive 3.4 defective product per million
On target, minimum process variation
6 sigma Process Capability
“What is it (CPK)”
• 3 Sigma ( Process capability of 1 CPK )
– if the process (lorry) slightly varies then the scrap or damage will
occur
• 6 Sigma ( Process capability of 2 CPK )
– if the process (lorry) varies, there will be no scrap or damage
Curbs
= required
process tolerances
CPK of 2
(6 sigma)
CPK of 1
(3 sigma)
 Variation exists in everything. Even the
best machine cannot make every unit
exactly the same.
 Improved capability, becomes a necessity,
due to the need of :
• improved designs
• lower costs
• better performance
 All of this leads to the need of tighter
tolerances
 This means that the ability to operate to a
tight tolerance, without producing defects
becomes a major advantage
Understanding Variability
Improvement methodology
On target,
minimum process variation
KPIV
Key
Process
Input
Variables
The Process
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
N1 N2 N3
Inputs:
Raw materials,
components, etc.
Uncontrollable Inputs
Y1, Y2, etc.
Quality
Characteristics:
Outputs
D M A I CD M A I C
Define
Measure
Analyze
Improve
Control
Improvement methodology
Define
Improvement methodology
• Define terms of reference (Charter the
project)
– Team / customer / project charter
– Brain storming
– Mind maps
– Affinity diagrams
– High level Process Maps
– Systematic diagrams / Fault tree
– Business Process Mapping
• Define customer requirements (Voice of
the customer)
– QFD Quality Function Deployment
•To develop a team charter.
•To define the customers
and their requirements
(CTQ Critical to Quality).
•To map the business
process to be improved
Characteristics
Importance out of 10
Product / customers
Define
• Define terms of reference (charting a project)
– What you can deliver to the customer and the support you need
from the customer to facilitate a successful improvement (contract
of engagement)
• Brain storming, Mind maps, Affinity diagrams, High level Process
Maps, Systematic diagrams / Fault tree, Business Process Mapping
– Tools to explore a problem, project or current thinking.
– Tools to group those ideas logically.
– Then define a route map to improvement, the risk involved and
how to mitigate that risk.
• Define customer requirements (Voice of the customer)
– QFD Quality Function Deployment, is a method of defining what
the customer needs, what is critical to there business success &
prioritise objectives to meet the customer need.
Measure
Improvement methodology
• Voice of the process
– Data Collection - 7 quality tools
– Tally charts
– Bar charts
– Pareto
– Run charts
– Control charts
– Cause & effect
– Check sheets
– Evaluate measurement systems
• Gauge R&R
• Select measures of performance
– Quality Function Deployment
•To measure and
understand baseline
performance for the
current process
Measure
• Voice of the process (7 quality tools)
– Tally charts, Bar charts, Pareto, Run charts, Control charts, Cause
& effect, Check sheets.
• Evaluate measurement systems Gauge R&R
– Every process has variation and measurement system, tools &
cmm are no exception.
– Typical your measurement process needs to be ACCURATE,
REPEATABLE & REPRODUCIBLE to less than 10% of the
tolerance you are trying to measure to & proven to be so.
• Select measures of performance
– QFD Quality Function Deployment is a method of defining what
the customer needs and what is critical to there business success
and prioritising performance measures to support the customers
need.
Analyze
Improvement methodology
• Investigate source of variation
(Special cause / Common causes)
– Stratification of data to get information
– Cause & effect
– CP & CPK
– Fault tree
– Contingence analysis
– FMEA (Failure Mode Effect Analysis)
– Design of experiments (DOE)
– Detailed process maps
Seek to:-
Prioritise
Understand
Clues
Causes
Monitor improvements
Look for signals
Lost
Shoe
Lost
Nail
Lost
Horse
Lost
Soldier
Lost
Battle
Why Battles are LostWhy Battles are Lost
Current Window of Consideration
Cause Failure
Mode
Effect
FMEA
•Identifies the ways in which a product or process can fail
•Estimates the risk of specific causes with regard to these failures
•Prioritizes the actions that should be taken to reduce the chance of failure
FMEA
(failure mode effect analysis)
factors which shift the average
factors which affect variation
factors which shift the average and affect
variation
factors which have no effect
A1 A2
D1=D2
B1
B2
C1
C2
DOE - (design of experiments)
will help us identify...
DOE - (design of experiments)
Measure the Process
The Process
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
N1 N2 N3
Inputs:
Raw
Materials,
components,
etc.
Uncontrollable Inputs
Y1, Y2, etc.
Quality
Characteristics:
Outputs
LSL USL
Establish the
performance
baseline
Process
Step/Input
Potential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects
S
E
V
Potential Causes
O
C
C
Current Controls
D
E
T
R
P
N
Actions
Recommended
Load DMF/DMF
Load Accuracy MischargeofDMF Viscosity out of spec 7 SOP not Followed 5
Operator Certification/ Process
Audit
5 175
Fool proofthis process
usinginput from TQL
Team
Steam to
DICY/Scale
Accuracy
ScaleNot Zeroed MischargeDMF 3 Faulty Scale 2 None 9 54
Include Daily sign-off of
Scale funtionin Shift
set-up verification.
Load DMF/DMF
Load Accuracy MischargeofDMF Viscosity out of spec 7 EquipmentFailure 2
Maintenance Procedure (SOP
5821)/VisualCheck
3 42
Steam to
DICY/Scale
Accuracy
Scale> 0 Low DMF Charge 3 Waterin Jacket 2 Visual Check ofJacket(SOP 5681) 4 24
Steam to
DICY/Scale
Accuracy
Scale Inaccurate High DMFCharge 3 Tank Hanging Up 2 Visual Check (SOP 5681) 4 24
DOE - (design of experiments) Analyse the
Process
The Process
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
N1 N2 N3
Inputs:
Raw
Materials,
components,
etc.
Uncontrollable Inputs
Y1, Y2, etc.
Quality
Characteristics:
Outputs
LSL USL
Key Outputs: Variable How Measured When Measured
1
2
3
Noise Variables: Variable How Measured When Measured
1
2
3
4
5
Controllable Inputs Variable How Measured When Measured
1
2
3
4
5
Overall Sampling Plan:
Run Temperature Pressure
1 Hi Hi
2 Hi Hi
3 Lo Hi
4 Lo Hi
5 Hi Lo
6 Hi Lo
7 Lo Lo
8 Lo Lo
3 .52 .51.5
Capability Histogram
4321
3 .0
2 .5
2 .0
1.5
Xbar and R Chart
S u b g r
Means
M U =2 .3 7 6
U C L =2 .5 6 8
L C L =2 .18 3
0 .9
0 .6
0 .3
0 .0
Ranges
R =0 .5 16 2
U C L =0 .9 6 2 1
L C L =0 .0 7 0 2 7
4321
Last 4 Subgroups
3 .0
2 .5
2 .0
1.5
Subgroup N um ber
Values
41
2 .9 19 5 81.8 3 17 5
Cp: 2.76
CP U: 2.99
CP L: 2.53
Cpk : 2.53
Capability Plot
Proc ess Toleranc e
Spec ific ations
St D ev : 0.181306
III
III
3 .52 .51.5
Norm al Prob P lot
C ap ab ility us ing P o o le d S tand ard D e viatio n
DOE - (design of experiments) Improve the
Process
Uncontrollable Inputs
The Process
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
N1 N2 N3
Inputs:
Raw
Materials,
components,
etc.
Y1, Y2, etc.
Quality
Characteristics:
OutputsX
X
X
LSL USL
LSL USL
ScrewRPM
PrimWdth
Nip FPM
Three Factor Design
DOE - (design of experiments) Control the
Process
The Process
X1 X2 X3
Controllable Inputs
Inputs:
Raw
Materials,
components,
etc.
N1 N2 N3
Uncontrollable Inputs
Y1, Y2, etc.
Quality
Characteristics:
Outputs LSL USL
Check
Lists
Error
Proofing
Work
Instructions
5 C’s
Analyze
• Investigate source of variation (Special cause / Common causes)
– Special cause variation are the one off, occasional and obvious
cause of a process / quality problems.
– Common cause variation are the day in day out causes of process
problems, because the process is not stable enough, they are
hidden (these form 80% of process problems)
– Conventional non-conformance management systems seek to solve
special cause variation (e.g. concessions) - but these only represent
15 - 20% of the total variation.
– 6 Sigma addresses all variation.
Improve
Improvement methodology
• Prioritise improvements
– Impact Vs Effort
– Brainstorming
– Affinity diagrams
– Solution selection matrix
• Tactical implementation plans
– Deliver improvements (reduce variation
systematically)
Customer protection
Get control
Improve process
Improve
• Prioritise improvements
– Tool commonly in uses are, Impact Vs Effort,
Brainstorming, Affinity diagrams, Solution selection
matrix.
– These tools help define the best method to meet the
customer need (as defined in the QFD)
• Tactical implementation plans
– Deliver improvements to reduce variation
systematically i.e. make a change, note the
improvement and make the next improvement.
– Critical we need to establish that any change is a
change for the good.
Control
Improvement methodology
• Control the process
– Recover
• Control plans
• Escalation process
– Prevent
• Poke yoke (mistake/ error proof)
– Monitor
• Control charts
• Checksheets
• Documentation and Standardisation
Control
• Control the process
– Recover, Control plans, Escalation process.
– Prevent by Poke yoke (fool proof the process) to fundamentally
remove the rood causes of process variation.
– Monitor, Control charts, Checksheets, Documentation and
Standardisation, to ensure that stable process is maintained and
that the process does not degrade.
• The objective is to remove the root causes of process variation,
management are only left with a few critical input variables in the
process that need controlling and not all inputs as before.
Where does 6 Sigma fit with Lean
Lean
improvements
6 Sigma
improvements
• Lean and 6 Sigma both seek to
deliver business improvement
• They are different in the
methods used and tools
employed
– Lean typically address the
total manufacturing
environment
– 6 sigma typical address the
root cause of process
variation
• There is significant benefit
from using the most appropriate
tools and improvement
methodology to meet the
customer requirements

More Related Content

PPTX
Statistical Process Control Tools
PDF
Basic Statistical Process Control
PPT
Training ppt for control plan
PDF
Basic SPC Training
PPTX
Statistical process control
PPTX
Spc training
PDF
Ops A La Carte SPC Seminar
Statistical Process Control Tools
Basic Statistical Process Control
Training ppt for control plan
Basic SPC Training
Statistical process control
Spc training
Ops A La Carte SPC Seminar

What's hot (20)

PDF
Process fmea
PPTX
Statistical Quality control
PPTX
Statistical process control
PPT
Spc training[1]
PPTX
Six Sigma : Process Capability
PDF
6 panel manual training guide by Tonatiuh Lozada Duarte an excellent method o...
PPTX
Statistical quality control 1,2
PPT
Introduction To Statistical Process Control
PPT
PPTX
PPTX
Statistical Process Control in Detail
PDF
Problem Solving using Six Sigma
PPTX
SATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(SPC)
PDF
Attribute MSA presentation
PPT
Six sigma-measure-phase2505
PPT
Spc material
PDF
90915 03006 wp928-80 genuine toyota oil filter
PPTX
Audit process tonatiuh lozada
PPT
Ppap training-presentation
PPTX
Process and product inspection
Process fmea
Statistical Quality control
Statistical process control
Spc training[1]
Six Sigma : Process Capability
6 panel manual training guide by Tonatiuh Lozada Duarte an excellent method o...
Statistical quality control 1,2
Introduction To Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process Control in Detail
Problem Solving using Six Sigma
SATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL(SPC)
Attribute MSA presentation
Six sigma-measure-phase2505
Spc material
90915 03006 wp928-80 genuine toyota oil filter
Audit process tonatiuh lozada
Ppap training-presentation
Process and product inspection
Ad

Similar to Ssoverview (20)

PPT
Process Capability.ppt related to quality
PPTX
process capablity.pptx Twill weave is durable
PPTX
Six_Sigma.pptx
PPT
2. Six Sigma Fundamentals...............
PPTX
PFMEA refresher training for the beginners to help them
PDF
Lean vs six sigma -jk
PPTX
Supplier_PFMEA_Workshop_rev 22_04_27.pptx
PDF
LeanSigma for IW 2005
PDF
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
PDF
Process Quality Control Training
PDF
Six sigma
PPT
Yellow belt training 68 s
PPTX
The 5 core tools are recognized as standard quality tools for the automotive ...
PPT
Quality management
DOC
C v a.madrigal ingles
DOC
C v a.madrigal ingles
PPT
Six sigma training
PPT
Six sigma training
PDF
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL PRESENTATION
PPT
5854579.ppt
Process Capability.ppt related to quality
process capablity.pptx Twill weave is durable
Six_Sigma.pptx
2. Six Sigma Fundamentals...............
PFMEA refresher training for the beginners to help them
Lean vs six sigma -jk
Supplier_PFMEA_Workshop_rev 22_04_27.pptx
LeanSigma for IW 2005
Six Sigma- Define & Measure_Sudhanshu.pdf
Process Quality Control Training
Six sigma
Yellow belt training 68 s
The 5 core tools are recognized as standard quality tools for the automotive ...
Quality management
C v a.madrigal ingles
C v a.madrigal ingles
Six sigma training
Six sigma training
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL PRESENTATION
5854579.ppt
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PDF
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
PPTX
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
PDF
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PPTX
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
PDF
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
PDF
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
PPTX
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
PDF
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
master seminar digital applications in india
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
3rd Neelam Sanjeevareddy Memorial Lecture.pdf
IMMUNITY IMMUNITY refers to protection against infection, and the immune syst...
Module 4: Burden of Disease Tutorial Slides S2 2025
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
GDM (1) (1).pptx small presentation for students
A systematic review of self-coping strategies used by university students to ...
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Yogi Goddess Pres Conference Studio Updates
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
VCE English Exam - Section C Student Revision Booklet
Cell Types and Its function , kingdom of life
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
The Lost Whites of Pakistan by Jahanzaib Mughal.pdf
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program

Ssoverview

  • 2. 4 Sigma Process Capability 99.38% Current Standard 6 Sigma Process Capability 99.99966% World-Class Long-Term Yield 3 Sigma Process Capability 93.32% Historical Standard The Classical View of Performance • Six-Sigma is a philosophy: • Why isn’t “99% acceptable” good enough...?? – 20,000 lost articles of mail every hour. – 15 minutes each day of unsafe drinking water. – 5,000 incorrect surgical procedures per week. – 4 or more accidents per day at major airports. – 200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year. – 7 hours each month without electricity.
  • 3. History of 6 Sigma • 6 Sigma manufacturing philosophy came from Motorola They recognised that sufficient process improvement would not occur using a conventional approach to quality. It was developed to help them reduce variation within a process by focusing effort on improving inputs to a process rather than reacting to outputs. • The process was failing the customer expectations – Traditionally, processes aimed for process capability of 3 to 4 sigma (Cpk=1.0 to 1.33 or 93% to 99.3% acceptable) – The customer received 6200 defective product per million at best – Processes now aim for 6 sigma (Cpk=2) – The customer would receive 3.4 defective product per million On target, minimum process variation
  • 4. 6 sigma Process Capability “What is it (CPK)” • 3 Sigma ( Process capability of 1 CPK ) – if the process (lorry) slightly varies then the scrap or damage will occur • 6 Sigma ( Process capability of 2 CPK ) – if the process (lorry) varies, there will be no scrap or damage Curbs = required process tolerances CPK of 2 (6 sigma) CPK of 1 (3 sigma)
  • 5.  Variation exists in everything. Even the best machine cannot make every unit exactly the same.  Improved capability, becomes a necessity, due to the need of : • improved designs • lower costs • better performance  All of this leads to the need of tighter tolerances  This means that the ability to operate to a tight tolerance, without producing defects becomes a major advantage Understanding Variability
  • 6. Improvement methodology On target, minimum process variation KPIV Key Process Input Variables The Process X1 X2 X3 Controllable Inputs N1 N2 N3 Inputs: Raw materials, components, etc. Uncontrollable Inputs Y1, Y2, etc. Quality Characteristics: Outputs
  • 7. D M A I CD M A I C Define Measure Analyze Improve Control Improvement methodology
  • 8. Define Improvement methodology • Define terms of reference (Charter the project) – Team / customer / project charter – Brain storming – Mind maps – Affinity diagrams – High level Process Maps – Systematic diagrams / Fault tree – Business Process Mapping • Define customer requirements (Voice of the customer) – QFD Quality Function Deployment •To develop a team charter. •To define the customers and their requirements (CTQ Critical to Quality). •To map the business process to be improved Characteristics Importance out of 10 Product / customers
  • 9. Define • Define terms of reference (charting a project) – What you can deliver to the customer and the support you need from the customer to facilitate a successful improvement (contract of engagement) • Brain storming, Mind maps, Affinity diagrams, High level Process Maps, Systematic diagrams / Fault tree, Business Process Mapping – Tools to explore a problem, project or current thinking. – Tools to group those ideas logically. – Then define a route map to improvement, the risk involved and how to mitigate that risk. • Define customer requirements (Voice of the customer) – QFD Quality Function Deployment, is a method of defining what the customer needs, what is critical to there business success & prioritise objectives to meet the customer need.
  • 10. Measure Improvement methodology • Voice of the process – Data Collection - 7 quality tools – Tally charts – Bar charts – Pareto – Run charts – Control charts – Cause & effect – Check sheets – Evaluate measurement systems • Gauge R&R • Select measures of performance – Quality Function Deployment •To measure and understand baseline performance for the current process
  • 11. Measure • Voice of the process (7 quality tools) – Tally charts, Bar charts, Pareto, Run charts, Control charts, Cause & effect, Check sheets. • Evaluate measurement systems Gauge R&R – Every process has variation and measurement system, tools & cmm are no exception. – Typical your measurement process needs to be ACCURATE, REPEATABLE & REPRODUCIBLE to less than 10% of the tolerance you are trying to measure to & proven to be so. • Select measures of performance – QFD Quality Function Deployment is a method of defining what the customer needs and what is critical to there business success and prioritising performance measures to support the customers need.
  • 12. Analyze Improvement methodology • Investigate source of variation (Special cause / Common causes) – Stratification of data to get information – Cause & effect – CP & CPK – Fault tree – Contingence analysis – FMEA (Failure Mode Effect Analysis) – Design of experiments (DOE) – Detailed process maps Seek to:- Prioritise Understand Clues Causes Monitor improvements Look for signals
  • 13. Lost Shoe Lost Nail Lost Horse Lost Soldier Lost Battle Why Battles are LostWhy Battles are Lost Current Window of Consideration Cause Failure Mode Effect FMEA •Identifies the ways in which a product or process can fail •Estimates the risk of specific causes with regard to these failures •Prioritizes the actions that should be taken to reduce the chance of failure FMEA (failure mode effect analysis)
  • 14. factors which shift the average factors which affect variation factors which shift the average and affect variation factors which have no effect A1 A2 D1=D2 B1 B2 C1 C2 DOE - (design of experiments) will help us identify...
  • 15. DOE - (design of experiments) Measure the Process The Process X1 X2 X3 Controllable Inputs N1 N2 N3 Inputs: Raw Materials, components, etc. Uncontrollable Inputs Y1, Y2, etc. Quality Characteristics: Outputs LSL USL Establish the performance baseline Process Step/Input Potential Failure Mode Potential Failure Effects S E V Potential Causes O C C Current Controls D E T R P N Actions Recommended Load DMF/DMF Load Accuracy MischargeofDMF Viscosity out of spec 7 SOP not Followed 5 Operator Certification/ Process Audit 5 175 Fool proofthis process usinginput from TQL Team Steam to DICY/Scale Accuracy ScaleNot Zeroed MischargeDMF 3 Faulty Scale 2 None 9 54 Include Daily sign-off of Scale funtionin Shift set-up verification. Load DMF/DMF Load Accuracy MischargeofDMF Viscosity out of spec 7 EquipmentFailure 2 Maintenance Procedure (SOP 5821)/VisualCheck 3 42 Steam to DICY/Scale Accuracy Scale> 0 Low DMF Charge 3 Waterin Jacket 2 Visual Check ofJacket(SOP 5681) 4 24 Steam to DICY/Scale Accuracy Scale Inaccurate High DMFCharge 3 Tank Hanging Up 2 Visual Check (SOP 5681) 4 24
  • 16. DOE - (design of experiments) Analyse the Process The Process X1 X2 X3 Controllable Inputs N1 N2 N3 Inputs: Raw Materials, components, etc. Uncontrollable Inputs Y1, Y2, etc. Quality Characteristics: Outputs LSL USL Key Outputs: Variable How Measured When Measured 1 2 3 Noise Variables: Variable How Measured When Measured 1 2 3 4 5 Controllable Inputs Variable How Measured When Measured 1 2 3 4 5 Overall Sampling Plan: Run Temperature Pressure 1 Hi Hi 2 Hi Hi 3 Lo Hi 4 Lo Hi 5 Hi Lo 6 Hi Lo 7 Lo Lo 8 Lo Lo 3 .52 .51.5 Capability Histogram 4321 3 .0 2 .5 2 .0 1.5 Xbar and R Chart S u b g r Means M U =2 .3 7 6 U C L =2 .5 6 8 L C L =2 .18 3 0 .9 0 .6 0 .3 0 .0 Ranges R =0 .5 16 2 U C L =0 .9 6 2 1 L C L =0 .0 7 0 2 7 4321 Last 4 Subgroups 3 .0 2 .5 2 .0 1.5 Subgroup N um ber Values 41 2 .9 19 5 81.8 3 17 5 Cp: 2.76 CP U: 2.99 CP L: 2.53 Cpk : 2.53 Capability Plot Proc ess Toleranc e Spec ific ations St D ev : 0.181306 III III 3 .52 .51.5 Norm al Prob P lot C ap ab ility us ing P o o le d S tand ard D e viatio n
  • 17. DOE - (design of experiments) Improve the Process Uncontrollable Inputs The Process X1 X2 X3 Controllable Inputs N1 N2 N3 Inputs: Raw Materials, components, etc. Y1, Y2, etc. Quality Characteristics: OutputsX X X LSL USL LSL USL ScrewRPM PrimWdth Nip FPM Three Factor Design
  • 18. DOE - (design of experiments) Control the Process The Process X1 X2 X3 Controllable Inputs Inputs: Raw Materials, components, etc. N1 N2 N3 Uncontrollable Inputs Y1, Y2, etc. Quality Characteristics: Outputs LSL USL Check Lists Error Proofing Work Instructions 5 C’s
  • 19. Analyze • Investigate source of variation (Special cause / Common causes) – Special cause variation are the one off, occasional and obvious cause of a process / quality problems. – Common cause variation are the day in day out causes of process problems, because the process is not stable enough, they are hidden (these form 80% of process problems) – Conventional non-conformance management systems seek to solve special cause variation (e.g. concessions) - but these only represent 15 - 20% of the total variation. – 6 Sigma addresses all variation.
  • 20. Improve Improvement methodology • Prioritise improvements – Impact Vs Effort – Brainstorming – Affinity diagrams – Solution selection matrix • Tactical implementation plans – Deliver improvements (reduce variation systematically) Customer protection Get control Improve process
  • 21. Improve • Prioritise improvements – Tool commonly in uses are, Impact Vs Effort, Brainstorming, Affinity diagrams, Solution selection matrix. – These tools help define the best method to meet the customer need (as defined in the QFD) • Tactical implementation plans – Deliver improvements to reduce variation systematically i.e. make a change, note the improvement and make the next improvement. – Critical we need to establish that any change is a change for the good.
  • 22. Control Improvement methodology • Control the process – Recover • Control plans • Escalation process – Prevent • Poke yoke (mistake/ error proof) – Monitor • Control charts • Checksheets • Documentation and Standardisation
  • 23. Control • Control the process – Recover, Control plans, Escalation process. – Prevent by Poke yoke (fool proof the process) to fundamentally remove the rood causes of process variation. – Monitor, Control charts, Checksheets, Documentation and Standardisation, to ensure that stable process is maintained and that the process does not degrade. • The objective is to remove the root causes of process variation, management are only left with a few critical input variables in the process that need controlling and not all inputs as before.
  • 24. Where does 6 Sigma fit with Lean Lean improvements 6 Sigma improvements • Lean and 6 Sigma both seek to deliver business improvement • They are different in the methods used and tools employed – Lean typically address the total manufacturing environment – 6 sigma typical address the root cause of process variation • There is significant benefit from using the most appropriate tools and improvement methodology to meet the customer requirements

Editor's Notes

  • #2: Extra Info Available Prepared Flip chart Photo Training Matl. Flip Chart Verbal Slide
  • #3: Key point :- The customer is receiving defective product
  • #4: Key point :- After the introduction of ^ sigma the customer is now not receiving defective product
  • #5: Key point :- 3 sigma would mean if you where to drive your car on to your drive, then you would you would just squeeze past the gate posts and error and the wing minors would be off 6 sigma would mean that you car could easily get past the gate posts with out any risk of breaking the wing mirrors off.
  • #6: Key point :- A stable process, repeatable process is the key i.e. the car it starts every time when you need it to start gets you to work and back in the same manor no variation, day in day out
  • #7: Key point :- Every process has inputs, man, method, material, machine and uncontrolled inputs these combine to give an out put (what the customer wants) By control the key inputs the out put is more stable less variation and is what the customer want, every time when they want it
  • #8: Key point :- 6 sigma 5 step improvement methodology
  • #9: Key point :- ? What is important to you, when you buying cookies write them down in silence and rank out of ten put them up on the board and compare to other in the group Cookie test characteristics:- (QFD) chocolate colour taste crunchiness
  • #10: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #11: Key point :- 7 quality tool Key question is the capability of the measurement process (key process)
  • #12: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #13: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #14: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #15: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #16: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #17: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #18: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #19: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #20: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #21: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #22: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #23: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #24: Key point :- Talk about each point
  • #25: Key point :- mutually supportive