SlideShare a Scribd company logo
METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICALS
1
THE
STROOP
EFFECT
2
Session Aims
 To give an introduction to a classic experiment:
Stroop (1935)
 To briefly describe Klein’s (1964) experiment
 To run a partial replication of Klein’s experiment
 To give some possible explanations of Stroop
and Klein
 To give some examples of other Stroop-like
experiments
3
The Stroop effect (1935)
Named after 1st
person to systematically
demonstrate
the effect
Jaensch (1929)
also described effect
…but not well written up…a lesson to us all!
J. Ridley Stroop (1897-1973 )
c.1933
4
Why study Stroop?
Reason 1: Example for use of mental chronometry
Most common form is the measurement of RTs
Response to single
trials is measured
repeatedly
Time to complete a
task consisting of
many trials is
measured
or
5
Why study Stroop?
Reason 2:
To investigate the nature
of attention & semantic
representations
-> more about this later !
6
Stroop (1935)
Part 1: Read 100 colour words
Condition 1 red, blue
Condition 2 red, blue
Part 2: Name ink colour for 100 items
Condition 1 red, blue
Condition 2 ■■■, ■■■■
43s
41s
110s
63s
7
Stroop’s conclusions:
 Participants could largely ignore the ink
colour when reading colour words
 BUT: Incongruent colour words interfered
with the task of colour naming
8
Today’s experiment:
 Klein (1964) – partial replication
 Klein used 6 different classes of words
 Task: name ink colour
 Klein showed not only incongruent colour
words produce interference
9
Klein (1964) – 6 cond typed in red, blue, green & yellow ink
1. Colour words (Classic Stroop)
redred,, blueblue,, greengreen,, yellowyellow
2. Other colour words (not required as naming responses)
tantan,, greygrey,, blackblack,, purplepurple
3. High frequency colour-related words
skysky,, firefire,, grassgrass,, lemonlemon
4. High frequency ‘neutral’ words
putput,, taketake,, heartheart,, friendfriend
5. Low frequency ‘neutral’ words
solsol,, efteft,, helothelot,, abjureabjure
6. Nonsense syllables (really letter strings)
hjhhjh,, bhdrbhdr,, gsxrqgsxrq,, evgjcevgjc
10
Klein’s results:
 Klein measured the time taken to name ink
colour in each of the 6 conditions
 Compared with a control condition (name colour
of rows of asterisks)
 Result: a graded interference effect
 Explanations later…
11
Klein’s results:
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Colour
names
Other
colour
words
High
freq
colour-
related
High
freq
neutral
Low freq
neutral
Letter
strings
Colour-naming condition
Meancolournamingtime
increment(secs)
12
Klein - faults:
 Return to Klein’s materials…
 What might be improved on them?
13
Errors in Klein’s materials
 Not all ‘neutral’ words i.e. heart, sol
 Word length not controlled (3, 4, 5, 6 letters) –
see Klein’s condition 3
We’ll correct for these and
 We’ll use Orange ink not Yellow ink
14
Our stimuli:
1. Colour words redred,, blueblue,, greengreen ,, orangeorange
2. Other colour words (non naming responses)
tantan,, greygrey,, brownbrown,, yellowyellow
3. Hi freq colour-related words
skysky,, firefire,, grassgrass,, carrotcarrot
4. Hi freq ‘neutral’ words
putput,, taketake,, grantgrant,, friendfriend
5. Low freq ‘neutral’ words
sotsot,, groggrog,, tapirtapir,, piquetpiquet
6. Letter strings
hjhhjh,, bhdrbhdr,, evgjcevgjc,, gsxrqzgsxrqz
15
Experimental Design
Between – participants (independent
groups) design:
Separate groups of participants are tested
for every condition
Advantage: results in one condition not
influenced by participants prior experience
with other conditions
Disadvantage: Random differences
between groups might mask experimental
effects
16
Experimental Design
Within – participants (repeated
measures) design:
Every participant is tested in every
condition
Advantage: Results not influenced by
random differences between participants
Disadvantage: results in one condition
influenced by participants prior experience
with other conditions
17
Experimental Design
Mixed design:
One (or more) within-subjects variable
One (or more) between-subjects variable
-> That’s what we will do here !
18
Procedure – Part 1
 Form groups of four
 Refer to Instructions for procedure on Duo
(Stroop ‘handout’)
 Do Condition A (read) and Condition B (name
ink colour of x’s) for each participant; record
times
 Timer: use your mobile!
 Write time for A and B on results sheet
19
Procedure: Important Notes
 Do not deliberately distort your vision (e.g.
don’t squint)
 Do not use finger to point to words
 Do not cover up words/parts of words
 Do correct mistakes
 Anyone colour blind?!
20
Procedure – Part 2
 Between-Subjects design: assigning Participants
to conditions
 Class compares RTs for Conditon B
 Each participant given 1 experimental condition
on basis of control condition (B = colour naming
of ‘x’s)
 Each participant does their own experimental
condition only
21
Results
When finished, bring your
results to the front please:
1. Reading time for Condition A
2. Colour naming time for Condition B
3. Name of your experimental condition
4. Naming time for experimental conditon
5. Naming time difference (Experimental
condition – Condition B)
6. Age / Sex
22
Explanations & Presentations:
 Interference
 Examples of other Stroop-like experiments
 Why you might get graded interference
 What to do with your results ....
23
Interference:
 Incongruent colour words interfered with
the task of colour naming => interference
 “Automatic reading” when attention paid to
words (Posner & Snyder, 1973)
 Note: Reading words (which is the normal
response) is faster than colour-naming
24
Interference:
Competition – how?
Word read could interfere with
1.IDENTIFICATION of ink colour
2. SAYING ink colour (i.e.
response)
Both occur - response
competition more important
25
Other Stroop-like experiments
Henderson (1973) – Find a letter
Find “A”
oeDcinAoieNie easier
oeDcanAoaeNae harder
(because other ‘a’s interfere)
26
Other Stroop-like experiments
Navon (1977) – Name global letter
FFFF E
F E
FFF easier than E
F E
F EEEEE
27
Other Stroop-like experiments
Morton (1979) – how many digits on line?
4444 44
333 faster than 3333
55555 555
28
Other Stroop-like experiments
Spatial task – where is word written: top or
bottom of square
easier
than
TOP
TOP
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
29
Other Stroop-like experiments
Verbal task: what is the pitch of the voice?
Say words “High” and “Low” in a high/low
tone
“High” in high tone & “Low” in low tone
easier than
“High” in low tone & “Low” in high tone
30
Graded interference - Explanation based on:
SEMANTIC MEMORY
Words stored in SEMANTIC NETWORK
Attend to word -> spreading activation through
network
One word PRIMES another -> words more
available as response
SKY might activate response “blue”
GROG unlikely to activate “blue”
31
…but “semantic memory” may not be the
whole story…
GROG
unlikely to activate “blue”
it might activate “ green” ?
because of the GR
…so orthography or other things may also
affect results
32
Presentations:
 In groups of about 4 people prepare a ppt-
Presentation on the Stroop experiment
 About 10 minutes of presentation / 5 min
of questions / comments
 Form groups now, write down names!
33
Presentations:
 Find data on DUO:
 Methods In Psychology -> 07_Stroop ->
Stroop_Results.xls
34
Presentations:
35
Title
 Should describe experiment completely &
appropriately
 Try and include Independent Variable (IV)
and Dependent Variable (DV) in title
36
Introduction
 Provides rationale for research
 Good idea to start broad and end narrow:
 Briefly discuss general issue
 Review relevant literature; theoretical / experimental
background; relate to your experiment
(i.e. What is the Stroop effect? Explanations of
Stroop; Klein’s experiment; explanations linked to
semantic memory & attention)
 General description of your experiment
(i.e. Partial replication of Klein (1964); how same?
how different?)
 End with experimental hypotheses/specific predictions
 Important to be selective about what material you include
37
Introduction
Experimental hypotheses:
1. Reading faster than Colour-Naming
(comparison of Conditions A & B)
2. Graded Interference effect (spell out
expected findings)
38
Method
 Should enable others to repeat your
study
 For presentation: not as detailed as for
your research reports
39
Participants
 Number, age (mean & sd), sex
 any other relevant info (e.g. vision
normal or corrected to normal; reading
problems; colour blindness?)
40
Design
 Design of experiment: MIXED
1 within-participant : Reading vs Naming;
1 between-participant: Colour relatedness
 Independent variables
IV1: Task type – 2 levels: Reading, Naming
IV2: Colour relatedness – 6 levels (describe 6
experimental conditions)
 Dependent variables
DV1: Time to complete task
DV2: Colour naming time increment (Experimental
condition – Control Condition B)
41
Results – Stroop
 (Hypothesis 1)
 summary of related t-test comparing Reading time
(condition A) with Colour Naming time (condition B)
 DO NOT include all the SPSS output!
 Some graphical representation of Reading time
(condition A) vs Colour Naming time (condition B)
 (Hypothesis 2) Colour Naming time increment:
 Mean value for 6 experimental conditions
 Bar chart of 6 mean scores (like Klein’s)
42
Discussion - General
 Assess the results in terms of the original aims
of the study.
 Do results support the hypotheses? What does
this mean regardingd theory? If more than one
possible interpretation of results, what other
studies might need to be done to find out which
interpretation correct? Problems with theory?
 Discuss unusual results
 Experimental faults and improvements
 What directions for future research does your
study indicate?
43
Discussion – Stroop
Discuss results:
 Is reading faster than colour naming?
 Explanations of the Stroop effect (semantic
network; attention)
 Is there a graded interference effect – what
accounts for this?
 Comparison of our results with Klein’s – if
differences, what accounts for them?
 Any other unexpected results?
Giving
Research Presentations
44
Outline
 Structuring your story
 Preparing your data/information
 Preparing and giving the presentation
 Concluding your presentation
 Questions and answers
45
How to Give an Effective
Presentation: Structure
 Basic rule
Say what you are going to say
 1-3 main points in the introduction
Say it
 Give the talk
Then say what you said
 Summarize main points in the conclusion
Don’t try to build suspense and then unveil a
surprise ending
46
Tell a Story
 Prepare your material so that it tells a
story logically
Subject: title, authors, acknowledgements
Introduction/overview
Method/approach
Results/information/analysis
Conclusion/summary
47
Tell a Story
 Use examples, anecdotes, and significant
details
 Create continuity so that your slides flow
smoothly
Guide the audience through your story
Your last point on one slide can anticipate the
next slide
48
Audience
 Why and to whom are you giving this
presentation?
 What do you want the audience to learn?
Think about this as you construct your talk
Edit your slides -- delete what is unnecessary,
distracting, confusing, off point
49
Presenting Your Methods, Data,
and Results
 Methods, Instrumentation
For most talks, only present the minimum
 Data Tables
Tables are useful for a small amount of data
Include units
Indicate data source if they are not your own
But tables are often used badly …
50
Esopus Creek
 Discharge of the
Esopus Creek
(Coldbrook, NY)
and precipitation
at Slide
Mountain, NY
(source:
USGS/NCDC)
51
date discharge precipitation date discharge precipitation
(cf/s) (in/day) (cf/s) (in/day)
1-Nov 631 0 1-Dec 1480 0.07
2-Nov 808 0 2-Dec 2920 0.96
3-Nov 794 0.08 3-Dec 2380 0
4-Nov 826 0 4-Dec 1990 0
5-Nov 1060 1.09 5-Dec 1770 0
6-Nov 1080 0.48 6-Dec 1620 0.1
7-Nov 1040 0.28 7-Dec 1500 0
8-Nov 779 0 8-Dec 1420 0
9-Nov 686 0 9-Dec 1350 0
10-Nov 670 0 10-Dec 1290 0
11-Nov 696 0.53 11-Dec 1280 0.1
12-Nov 831 0.23 12-Dec 1330 0.47
13-Nov 985 0.45 13-Dec 1280 0
14-Nov 1080 0.14 14-Dec 1250 0.57
15-Nov 1350 0.65 15-Dec 1190 0.04
16-Nov 1430 0 16-Dec 1180 0
17-Nov 2440 1.6 17-Dec 1160 0.17
18-Nov 2280 0 18-Dec 1120 0.01
19-Nov 2040 0 19-Dec 1080 0
20-Nov 1830 0.55 20-Dec 1070 0
21-Nov 1650 0 21-Dec 1080 0
22-Nov 1560 0 22-Dec 1060 0
23-Nov 1520 0.39 23-Dec 1060 0.18
24-Nov 1410 0 24-Dec 1050 0
25-Nov 1320 0 25-Dec 1050 0.5
26-Nov 1310 0.11 26-Dec 986 0
27-Nov 1450 0.78 27-Dec 1010 0
28-Nov 1560 0.22 28-Dec 1010 0.07
29-Nov 1550 0.45 29-Dec 977 0
30-Nov 1480 0 30-Dec 972 0
31-Dec 957 0
Esopus Creek
Discharge of the Esopus Creek (Coldbrook, NY) and precipitation at Slide
Mountain, NY (source: USGS/NCDC) 52
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1-Nov 8-Nov 15-Nov 22-Nov 29-Nov 6-Dec 13-Dec 20-Dec 27-Dec
Date in 1992
Dischargerate(cf/s)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Precipitation(in/day)
discharge (cf/s)
precipitation (in/day)
Preparing Your Data, continued
 Figures
‘1 figure ≈ 1000 words’
Figures should be readable, understandable,
uncluttered
Keep figures simple, use color logically for
clarification
53
Preparing the Presentation
 Average not more than 1 slide per minute
 MS Powerpoint is standard
If you use something else, be careful to check
it in advance
 No sounds! Some logical animations good
54
Preparing the Presentation
 Use 3-7 bullets per page
Avoid writing out, and especially reading, long
and complete sentences on slides because it
is really boring to the audience
 Slide appearance (font, colors) should be
consistent
 Spellcheck
55
What Font to Use
 20 point
 24 point
 28 point
 36 point
56
AVOID USING ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
BECAUSE IT’S MUCH HARDER TO READ
Color
57
Dark letters against a light background work
Dark letters against a light background
are best for smaller rooms, especially when the
lights are on for teaching
Color
58
Light letters against a dark background also
work
Many experts feel that a dark blue or black
background works best for talks in a large room,
especially when the lights are low
Preparing Yourself...
 Immerse yourself in what you are going to
say
Web of Science/Google it: use the latest news
 Make sure you are familiar with the
projection equipment, remote control and
Powerpoint
Bring your presentation on a memory stick
AND a laptop with power supply AND an
extension cord …
59
Print Your Slides
 Don’t read the presentation
 Print out copies of your slides
You can annotate them and use them as
notes
You can review them as you’re waiting
If everything crashes – the bulb blows, you
can still make your main points in a logical
way
60
Rehearsing
Practice – actually stand up and say the
words out loud
You discover what you don’t understand
You develop a natural flow
You come up with better phrasings and ways
to describe things
 It is harder to explain things than you think,
practicing helps you find the words
Stay within the time limit
61
Rehearsing
Don’t over rehearse or memorize the talk
The first practice things will improve at least
10 fold -- the second will make things twice as
good -- the third may add a bit of polish, but
from there it can easily get worse
62
Giving the Presentation
 Starting out is the
hardest part of the talk
To get going, memorize
the first few lines
“Hello, I’m Stephanie
Pfirman. The title of my
presentation is, ‘The
Arctic Marginal Ice Zone.’
…
63
Giving the Presentation
Experienced speakers:
Speak freely and look
directly at audience
64
Giving the Presentation
Inexperienced speakers:
Put outline and key points of your
presentation on your slides
 You don’t have to remember what to say
 Eyes are on the slide not on you
 Key points are there for people who weren’t
listening or who are visual learners
65
Giving the Presentation
 Stand where the figures can be seen
 Look at people during presentation
 Be enthusiastic
 Don’t worry about stopping to think
 Don’t rush
Figure out which slide is your half-way mark
and use that to check your time
66
Giving the Presentation
 Don’t apologize or make comments about
yourself
“I hope you’re not bored”
“I was working on this ‘til 3 am”
 Don’t overuse the pointer
 Don’t force being funny
 Don’t forget acknowledgements, always
give proper credit
67
Concluding Your Content
 Announce the ending so that people are
prepared
For example, with a slide titled “Conclusions”
Or by saying, “In my final slide …” or “My final
point is …”
 Have only a few concluding statements
68
Concluding Your Content
 Come back to the big picture and
summarize the significance of your work in
that context
Extend logically beyond your limited study –
but don’t overreach
 Open up new perspective
Describe future work, raise questions,
potential implications
69
Finishing Your Presentation
 Think carefully about your final words and
how to finish your presentation strongly
Don’t just drift off … “I guess that’s all I have
to say …”
You may want to actually memorize your
ending lines, just as you do your starting
points
Say: “Any questions?”
70
What Can Go Wrong?
 Uncertainty about material
 Interruptions
 Running out of slides
 Running out of time
71
Uncertainty About the Material
 Try to structure your talk so that you are sure
about the material you present
 If you have to address something important that
you are unsure of
 Acknowledge the gap in your understanding
 “I’m working on it” or “I’m looking into it”
 This is better than being pressed to admit something
 Also it may very well be an open question
 Another way to handle this is to raise it as a
question yourself
72
Minor Interruptions
During Your Presentation
 Don’t look irritated or rushed
 Answer – briefly – just enough to straighten it out
 Then carry on with your presentation without checking
back
 A question that you will answer later in your talk?
 Say “Good point; just wait two slides”
 Requires a long answer and is not critical
understanding?
 Say “Good point; I’ll come back to it at the end of the
talk.” 73
Major Interruptions
During Your Presentation
 If most in the audience are non-specialists
 Explain the issue to the audience
 Delay discussion until after the talk
 If most of the audience is knowledgeable
 Make your point as clearly as you can
 Discuss it out – don’t try to diminish or avoid it
74
Running Out of
Slides
 Short talks are better than ones that are
too long
 What to do:
Don’t make a personal comment
 “hum, I’m running out of slides …”
Stretch it a little -- see if you can think of an
example, or story, to bolster your points
Conclude unhurriedly, summarizing your main
points, but don’t be repetitious
75
Running Out of
Time
 Avoid this – impolite to other speakers and
the audience: if it happens …
Do not assume that you can carry on past
your time
Do not skip all of your slides looking for the
right one to put on next
Conclude – on time wherever you are in your
talk -- by making your main points
76
Questions and Answers
 Questions after your talk can be difficult
but they definitely help you in writing up
your research
Identifies parts the audience did not
understand
Focuses and adds dimension to your analysis
77
Questions and Answers
 You can repeat the question
This gives you time to think
The rest of the audience may not have heard
the question
Also if you heard the question incorrectly, it
presents an opportunity for clarification
78
Questions and Answers,
continued
 Keep your answers short and to the point
– don’t respond with another lecture
 Don’t say that a question is bad, or that
you addressed it already
Rephrase it into something that you want to
talk about
The research world is smaller than you think
and you will continue to encounter people
throughout your career
79
Difficult Questions
 First of all:
 Usually you have thought more about the
material than anyone else -- this puts you
in a stronger position than you may think
80
Difficult Questions
 Anticipate typical questions and prepare
for them
Generalizability of your findings to other
times? Other places? Other conditions?
Methodological bias? Uncertainties?
Exceptions? Priorities?
 Still concerned about questions?
Make extra slides – perhaps on details of
instrumentation or methodology
81
Difficult Questions, continued
 If you really don't know the answer
Say "Interesting, I will look into that" or “That’s
a good point, let’s discuss it afterwards”
Don't feel that you have to invent an answer
on the fly -- you are only human and you can't
have thought of everything
82
Conclusions
 Structure your content in a way that is
comfortable for you
 Use your own style to your advantage
 Think ahead about where you might
encounter difficulties and figure out ways
to overcome them
83
84
ANY QUESTIONS?
IMPORTANT:
In two weeks !
Bring you presentation on a memory
stick
Or email it to me by Dec. 3rd
!

More Related Content

PPTX
Neuro cognitive disorders
PPTX
Social Cognitive Theory
PPTX
Cognitive disorders
PPTX
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 2
PPTX
Different types of informational text
PPT
Maryhill College Gr. 5-6 Spelling Bee
PPTX
Republic Act No. 11313 Safe Spaces Act (Bawal Bastos Law).pptx
PPTX
Neuro cognitive disorders
Social Cognitive Theory
Cognitive disorders
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 2
Different types of informational text
Maryhill College Gr. 5-6 Spelling Bee
Republic Act No. 11313 Safe Spaces Act (Bawal Bastos Law).pptx

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Halstead Reitan & Luria-Nebraska battery
PPT
Prosocial Behavior
PPT
PPT
Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery
PPTX
Clinical Interview
PPTX
PPTX
1 introduction to experimental psychology
PPTX
neuropsychological assessment in SMI
PPTX
Luria Nebraska battery brain damage
PPTX
Neuropsychological Assessment
PPTX
Positive Psychology ppt
PPTX
Clinical neuropsychological testing
PPTX
1 Introduction to Psychological Assessment
PPTX
Altruism Theories
PPTX
Evolution of DSM
PPT
Assessment & Diagnosis
PPTX
Intelligence, IQ, Assessments, Pre-morbid intelligence
PPTX
Wechsler Intelligence and Memory Scales
PPTX
Bhatiabattery
Halstead Reitan & Luria-Nebraska battery
Prosocial Behavior
Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery
Clinical Interview
1 introduction to experimental psychology
neuropsychological assessment in SMI
Luria Nebraska battery brain damage
Neuropsychological Assessment
Positive Psychology ppt
Clinical neuropsychological testing
1 Introduction to Psychological Assessment
Altruism Theories
Evolution of DSM
Assessment & Diagnosis
Intelligence, IQ, Assessments, Pre-morbid intelligence
Wechsler Intelligence and Memory Scales
Bhatiabattery
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPTX
Science Fair - Stroop Effect
DOC
Stroop Effect
PPTX
Color Stroop Effects on Students’ Cognitive Ability
PDF
Stroop Effect Research Paper Example APA Style
PDF
JEP HPP 1998
PPTX
Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint
PDF
Stroop There It Is
PDF
Riabilitazione disprassia m
PPTX
Stroopeffect
PPT
3.funzioni esecutive
PPTX
PPTX
Pelvic tilt
PDF
Diversity Tactics that Work - In-house Recruitment Conference, Manchester
PPTX
Scoliosis (Spine Disorder)
PPTX
IA Method Section Guide
PPT
Developing a Hypothesis and Title for your Experiment
PPTX
Introduction to the ia
PPTX
Introduction Overview
PPTX
IA Presentation/Format Section
Science Fair - Stroop Effect
Stroop Effect
Color Stroop Effects on Students’ Cognitive Ability
Stroop Effect Research Paper Example APA Style
JEP HPP 1998
Pyc 2020 Final Powerpoint
Stroop There It Is
Riabilitazione disprassia m
Stroopeffect
3.funzioni esecutive
Pelvic tilt
Diversity Tactics that Work - In-house Recruitment Conference, Manchester
Scoliosis (Spine Disorder)
IA Method Section Guide
Developing a Hypothesis and Title for your Experiment
Introduction to the ia
Introduction Overview
IA Presentation/Format Section
Ad

Similar to Stroop(2) (20)

PPTX
Stroop2.pptx
DOCX
Mengxue HuReflection Paper #210202015Topic explain.docx
PPTX
Exploring The Effect Of Color On Cognitive Task
ODP
Classics 2011
DOCX
Assessment use of english and speaking specifications and key
PPT
Complete ielts (2) unit 1 - writing - task 1
DOCX
Introduction to BusinessR.D. SkidmoreTest #1Introduction.docx
PPTX
PDF
BoysTownJobTalk
PPSX
How to Make Effective Presentation
PDF
0627_y17_spa_P1_v2.pdf igcse english exam
PPTX
Sampling s3 12-01-17-2012
PDF
ENg(201) business and technical writting
PPTX
Sampling s3 12-01-17-2012
PPTX
IRP Presentation
PPTX
IRP Presentation
DOCX
Cogn lab include in the paper – a bit of each an include the resu.docx
PPT
Business english
PPTX
Neuropsychological testing of cognitive domains
DOCX
Of Mice and Men Edexcel English Language Revision Guide
Stroop2.pptx
Mengxue HuReflection Paper #210202015Topic explain.docx
Exploring The Effect Of Color On Cognitive Task
Classics 2011
Assessment use of english and speaking specifications and key
Complete ielts (2) unit 1 - writing - task 1
Introduction to BusinessR.D. SkidmoreTest #1Introduction.docx
BoysTownJobTalk
How to Make Effective Presentation
0627_y17_spa_P1_v2.pdf igcse english exam
Sampling s3 12-01-17-2012
ENg(201) business and technical writting
Sampling s3 12-01-17-2012
IRP Presentation
IRP Presentation
Cogn lab include in the paper – a bit of each an include the resu.docx
Business english
Neuropsychological testing of cognitive domains
Of Mice and Men Edexcel English Language Revision Guide

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
DOC
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
medical_surgical_nursing_10th_edition_ignatavicius_TEST_BANK_pdf.pdf
Soft-furnishing-By-Architect-A.F.M.Mohiuddin-Akhand.doc
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011

Stroop(2)

  • 1. METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICALS 1 THE STROOP EFFECT
  • 2. 2 Session Aims  To give an introduction to a classic experiment: Stroop (1935)  To briefly describe Klein’s (1964) experiment  To run a partial replication of Klein’s experiment  To give some possible explanations of Stroop and Klein  To give some examples of other Stroop-like experiments
  • 3. 3 The Stroop effect (1935) Named after 1st person to systematically demonstrate the effect Jaensch (1929) also described effect …but not well written up…a lesson to us all! J. Ridley Stroop (1897-1973 ) c.1933
  • 4. 4 Why study Stroop? Reason 1: Example for use of mental chronometry Most common form is the measurement of RTs Response to single trials is measured repeatedly Time to complete a task consisting of many trials is measured or
  • 5. 5 Why study Stroop? Reason 2: To investigate the nature of attention & semantic representations -> more about this later !
  • 6. 6 Stroop (1935) Part 1: Read 100 colour words Condition 1 red, blue Condition 2 red, blue Part 2: Name ink colour for 100 items Condition 1 red, blue Condition 2 ■■■, ■■■■ 43s 41s 110s 63s
  • 7. 7 Stroop’s conclusions:  Participants could largely ignore the ink colour when reading colour words  BUT: Incongruent colour words interfered with the task of colour naming
  • 8. 8 Today’s experiment:  Klein (1964) – partial replication  Klein used 6 different classes of words  Task: name ink colour  Klein showed not only incongruent colour words produce interference
  • 9. 9 Klein (1964) – 6 cond typed in red, blue, green & yellow ink 1. Colour words (Classic Stroop) redred,, blueblue,, greengreen,, yellowyellow 2. Other colour words (not required as naming responses) tantan,, greygrey,, blackblack,, purplepurple 3. High frequency colour-related words skysky,, firefire,, grassgrass,, lemonlemon 4. High frequency ‘neutral’ words putput,, taketake,, heartheart,, friendfriend 5. Low frequency ‘neutral’ words solsol,, efteft,, helothelot,, abjureabjure 6. Nonsense syllables (really letter strings) hjhhjh,, bhdrbhdr,, gsxrqgsxrq,, evgjcevgjc
  • 10. 10 Klein’s results:  Klein measured the time taken to name ink colour in each of the 6 conditions  Compared with a control condition (name colour of rows of asterisks)  Result: a graded interference effect  Explanations later…
  • 12. 12 Klein - faults:  Return to Klein’s materials…  What might be improved on them?
  • 13. 13 Errors in Klein’s materials  Not all ‘neutral’ words i.e. heart, sol  Word length not controlled (3, 4, 5, 6 letters) – see Klein’s condition 3 We’ll correct for these and  We’ll use Orange ink not Yellow ink
  • 14. 14 Our stimuli: 1. Colour words redred,, blueblue,, greengreen ,, orangeorange 2. Other colour words (non naming responses) tantan,, greygrey,, brownbrown,, yellowyellow 3. Hi freq colour-related words skysky,, firefire,, grassgrass,, carrotcarrot 4. Hi freq ‘neutral’ words putput,, taketake,, grantgrant,, friendfriend 5. Low freq ‘neutral’ words sotsot,, groggrog,, tapirtapir,, piquetpiquet 6. Letter strings hjhhjh,, bhdrbhdr,, evgjcevgjc,, gsxrqzgsxrqz
  • 15. 15 Experimental Design Between – participants (independent groups) design: Separate groups of participants are tested for every condition Advantage: results in one condition not influenced by participants prior experience with other conditions Disadvantage: Random differences between groups might mask experimental effects
  • 16. 16 Experimental Design Within – participants (repeated measures) design: Every participant is tested in every condition Advantage: Results not influenced by random differences between participants Disadvantage: results in one condition influenced by participants prior experience with other conditions
  • 17. 17 Experimental Design Mixed design: One (or more) within-subjects variable One (or more) between-subjects variable -> That’s what we will do here !
  • 18. 18 Procedure – Part 1  Form groups of four  Refer to Instructions for procedure on Duo (Stroop ‘handout’)  Do Condition A (read) and Condition B (name ink colour of x’s) for each participant; record times  Timer: use your mobile!  Write time for A and B on results sheet
  • 19. 19 Procedure: Important Notes  Do not deliberately distort your vision (e.g. don’t squint)  Do not use finger to point to words  Do not cover up words/parts of words  Do correct mistakes  Anyone colour blind?!
  • 20. 20 Procedure – Part 2  Between-Subjects design: assigning Participants to conditions  Class compares RTs for Conditon B  Each participant given 1 experimental condition on basis of control condition (B = colour naming of ‘x’s)  Each participant does their own experimental condition only
  • 21. 21 Results When finished, bring your results to the front please: 1. Reading time for Condition A 2. Colour naming time for Condition B 3. Name of your experimental condition 4. Naming time for experimental conditon 5. Naming time difference (Experimental condition – Condition B) 6. Age / Sex
  • 22. 22 Explanations & Presentations:  Interference  Examples of other Stroop-like experiments  Why you might get graded interference  What to do with your results ....
  • 23. 23 Interference:  Incongruent colour words interfered with the task of colour naming => interference  “Automatic reading” when attention paid to words (Posner & Snyder, 1973)  Note: Reading words (which is the normal response) is faster than colour-naming
  • 24. 24 Interference: Competition – how? Word read could interfere with 1.IDENTIFICATION of ink colour 2. SAYING ink colour (i.e. response) Both occur - response competition more important
  • 25. 25 Other Stroop-like experiments Henderson (1973) – Find a letter Find “A” oeDcinAoieNie easier oeDcanAoaeNae harder (because other ‘a’s interfere)
  • 26. 26 Other Stroop-like experiments Navon (1977) – Name global letter FFFF E F E FFF easier than E F E F EEEEE
  • 27. 27 Other Stroop-like experiments Morton (1979) – how many digits on line? 4444 44 333 faster than 3333 55555 555
  • 28. 28 Other Stroop-like experiments Spatial task – where is word written: top or bottom of square easier than TOP TOP BOTTOM BOTTOM
  • 29. 29 Other Stroop-like experiments Verbal task: what is the pitch of the voice? Say words “High” and “Low” in a high/low tone “High” in high tone & “Low” in low tone easier than “High” in low tone & “Low” in high tone
  • 30. 30 Graded interference - Explanation based on: SEMANTIC MEMORY Words stored in SEMANTIC NETWORK Attend to word -> spreading activation through network One word PRIMES another -> words more available as response SKY might activate response “blue” GROG unlikely to activate “blue”
  • 31. 31 …but “semantic memory” may not be the whole story… GROG unlikely to activate “blue” it might activate “ green” ? because of the GR …so orthography or other things may also affect results
  • 32. 32 Presentations:  In groups of about 4 people prepare a ppt- Presentation on the Stroop experiment  About 10 minutes of presentation / 5 min of questions / comments  Form groups now, write down names!
  • 33. 33 Presentations:  Find data on DUO:  Methods In Psychology -> 07_Stroop -> Stroop_Results.xls
  • 35. 35 Title  Should describe experiment completely & appropriately  Try and include Independent Variable (IV) and Dependent Variable (DV) in title
  • 36. 36 Introduction  Provides rationale for research  Good idea to start broad and end narrow:  Briefly discuss general issue  Review relevant literature; theoretical / experimental background; relate to your experiment (i.e. What is the Stroop effect? Explanations of Stroop; Klein’s experiment; explanations linked to semantic memory & attention)  General description of your experiment (i.e. Partial replication of Klein (1964); how same? how different?)  End with experimental hypotheses/specific predictions  Important to be selective about what material you include
  • 37. 37 Introduction Experimental hypotheses: 1. Reading faster than Colour-Naming (comparison of Conditions A & B) 2. Graded Interference effect (spell out expected findings)
  • 38. 38 Method  Should enable others to repeat your study  For presentation: not as detailed as for your research reports
  • 39. 39 Participants  Number, age (mean & sd), sex  any other relevant info (e.g. vision normal or corrected to normal; reading problems; colour blindness?)
  • 40. 40 Design  Design of experiment: MIXED 1 within-participant : Reading vs Naming; 1 between-participant: Colour relatedness  Independent variables IV1: Task type – 2 levels: Reading, Naming IV2: Colour relatedness – 6 levels (describe 6 experimental conditions)  Dependent variables DV1: Time to complete task DV2: Colour naming time increment (Experimental condition – Control Condition B)
  • 41. 41 Results – Stroop  (Hypothesis 1)  summary of related t-test comparing Reading time (condition A) with Colour Naming time (condition B)  DO NOT include all the SPSS output!  Some graphical representation of Reading time (condition A) vs Colour Naming time (condition B)  (Hypothesis 2) Colour Naming time increment:  Mean value for 6 experimental conditions  Bar chart of 6 mean scores (like Klein’s)
  • 42. 42 Discussion - General  Assess the results in terms of the original aims of the study.  Do results support the hypotheses? What does this mean regardingd theory? If more than one possible interpretation of results, what other studies might need to be done to find out which interpretation correct? Problems with theory?  Discuss unusual results  Experimental faults and improvements  What directions for future research does your study indicate?
  • 43. 43 Discussion – Stroop Discuss results:  Is reading faster than colour naming?  Explanations of the Stroop effect (semantic network; attention)  Is there a graded interference effect – what accounts for this?  Comparison of our results with Klein’s – if differences, what accounts for them?  Any other unexpected results?
  • 45. Outline  Structuring your story  Preparing your data/information  Preparing and giving the presentation  Concluding your presentation  Questions and answers 45
  • 46. How to Give an Effective Presentation: Structure  Basic rule Say what you are going to say  1-3 main points in the introduction Say it  Give the talk Then say what you said  Summarize main points in the conclusion Don’t try to build suspense and then unveil a surprise ending 46
  • 47. Tell a Story  Prepare your material so that it tells a story logically Subject: title, authors, acknowledgements Introduction/overview Method/approach Results/information/analysis Conclusion/summary 47
  • 48. Tell a Story  Use examples, anecdotes, and significant details  Create continuity so that your slides flow smoothly Guide the audience through your story Your last point on one slide can anticipate the next slide 48
  • 49. Audience  Why and to whom are you giving this presentation?  What do you want the audience to learn? Think about this as you construct your talk Edit your slides -- delete what is unnecessary, distracting, confusing, off point 49
  • 50. Presenting Your Methods, Data, and Results  Methods, Instrumentation For most talks, only present the minimum  Data Tables Tables are useful for a small amount of data Include units Indicate data source if they are not your own But tables are often used badly … 50
  • 51. Esopus Creek  Discharge of the Esopus Creek (Coldbrook, NY) and precipitation at Slide Mountain, NY (source: USGS/NCDC) 51 date discharge precipitation date discharge precipitation (cf/s) (in/day) (cf/s) (in/day) 1-Nov 631 0 1-Dec 1480 0.07 2-Nov 808 0 2-Dec 2920 0.96 3-Nov 794 0.08 3-Dec 2380 0 4-Nov 826 0 4-Dec 1990 0 5-Nov 1060 1.09 5-Dec 1770 0 6-Nov 1080 0.48 6-Dec 1620 0.1 7-Nov 1040 0.28 7-Dec 1500 0 8-Nov 779 0 8-Dec 1420 0 9-Nov 686 0 9-Dec 1350 0 10-Nov 670 0 10-Dec 1290 0 11-Nov 696 0.53 11-Dec 1280 0.1 12-Nov 831 0.23 12-Dec 1330 0.47 13-Nov 985 0.45 13-Dec 1280 0 14-Nov 1080 0.14 14-Dec 1250 0.57 15-Nov 1350 0.65 15-Dec 1190 0.04 16-Nov 1430 0 16-Dec 1180 0 17-Nov 2440 1.6 17-Dec 1160 0.17 18-Nov 2280 0 18-Dec 1120 0.01 19-Nov 2040 0 19-Dec 1080 0 20-Nov 1830 0.55 20-Dec 1070 0 21-Nov 1650 0 21-Dec 1080 0 22-Nov 1560 0 22-Dec 1060 0 23-Nov 1520 0.39 23-Dec 1060 0.18 24-Nov 1410 0 24-Dec 1050 0 25-Nov 1320 0 25-Dec 1050 0.5 26-Nov 1310 0.11 26-Dec 986 0 27-Nov 1450 0.78 27-Dec 1010 0 28-Nov 1560 0.22 28-Dec 1010 0.07 29-Nov 1550 0.45 29-Dec 977 0 30-Nov 1480 0 30-Dec 972 0 31-Dec 957 0
  • 52. Esopus Creek Discharge of the Esopus Creek (Coldbrook, NY) and precipitation at Slide Mountain, NY (source: USGS/NCDC) 52 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 1-Nov 8-Nov 15-Nov 22-Nov 29-Nov 6-Dec 13-Dec 20-Dec 27-Dec Date in 1992 Dischargerate(cf/s) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Precipitation(in/day) discharge (cf/s) precipitation (in/day)
  • 53. Preparing Your Data, continued  Figures ‘1 figure ≈ 1000 words’ Figures should be readable, understandable, uncluttered Keep figures simple, use color logically for clarification 53
  • 54. Preparing the Presentation  Average not more than 1 slide per minute  MS Powerpoint is standard If you use something else, be careful to check it in advance  No sounds! Some logical animations good 54
  • 55. Preparing the Presentation  Use 3-7 bullets per page Avoid writing out, and especially reading, long and complete sentences on slides because it is really boring to the audience  Slide appearance (font, colors) should be consistent  Spellcheck 55
  • 56. What Font to Use  20 point  24 point  28 point  36 point 56 AVOID USING ALL CAPITAL LETTERS BECAUSE IT’S MUCH HARDER TO READ
  • 57. Color 57 Dark letters against a light background work Dark letters against a light background are best for smaller rooms, especially when the lights are on for teaching
  • 58. Color 58 Light letters against a dark background also work Many experts feel that a dark blue or black background works best for talks in a large room, especially when the lights are low
  • 59. Preparing Yourself...  Immerse yourself in what you are going to say Web of Science/Google it: use the latest news  Make sure you are familiar with the projection equipment, remote control and Powerpoint Bring your presentation on a memory stick AND a laptop with power supply AND an extension cord … 59
  • 60. Print Your Slides  Don’t read the presentation  Print out copies of your slides You can annotate them and use them as notes You can review them as you’re waiting If everything crashes – the bulb blows, you can still make your main points in a logical way 60
  • 61. Rehearsing Practice – actually stand up and say the words out loud You discover what you don’t understand You develop a natural flow You come up with better phrasings and ways to describe things  It is harder to explain things than you think, practicing helps you find the words Stay within the time limit 61
  • 62. Rehearsing Don’t over rehearse or memorize the talk The first practice things will improve at least 10 fold -- the second will make things twice as good -- the third may add a bit of polish, but from there it can easily get worse 62
  • 63. Giving the Presentation  Starting out is the hardest part of the talk To get going, memorize the first few lines “Hello, I’m Stephanie Pfirman. The title of my presentation is, ‘The Arctic Marginal Ice Zone.’ … 63
  • 64. Giving the Presentation Experienced speakers: Speak freely and look directly at audience 64
  • 65. Giving the Presentation Inexperienced speakers: Put outline and key points of your presentation on your slides  You don’t have to remember what to say  Eyes are on the slide not on you  Key points are there for people who weren’t listening or who are visual learners 65
  • 66. Giving the Presentation  Stand where the figures can be seen  Look at people during presentation  Be enthusiastic  Don’t worry about stopping to think  Don’t rush Figure out which slide is your half-way mark and use that to check your time 66
  • 67. Giving the Presentation  Don’t apologize or make comments about yourself “I hope you’re not bored” “I was working on this ‘til 3 am”  Don’t overuse the pointer  Don’t force being funny  Don’t forget acknowledgements, always give proper credit 67
  • 68. Concluding Your Content  Announce the ending so that people are prepared For example, with a slide titled “Conclusions” Or by saying, “In my final slide …” or “My final point is …”  Have only a few concluding statements 68
  • 69. Concluding Your Content  Come back to the big picture and summarize the significance of your work in that context Extend logically beyond your limited study – but don’t overreach  Open up new perspective Describe future work, raise questions, potential implications 69
  • 70. Finishing Your Presentation  Think carefully about your final words and how to finish your presentation strongly Don’t just drift off … “I guess that’s all I have to say …” You may want to actually memorize your ending lines, just as you do your starting points Say: “Any questions?” 70
  • 71. What Can Go Wrong?  Uncertainty about material  Interruptions  Running out of slides  Running out of time 71
  • 72. Uncertainty About the Material  Try to structure your talk so that you are sure about the material you present  If you have to address something important that you are unsure of  Acknowledge the gap in your understanding  “I’m working on it” or “I’m looking into it”  This is better than being pressed to admit something  Also it may very well be an open question  Another way to handle this is to raise it as a question yourself 72
  • 73. Minor Interruptions During Your Presentation  Don’t look irritated or rushed  Answer – briefly – just enough to straighten it out  Then carry on with your presentation without checking back  A question that you will answer later in your talk?  Say “Good point; just wait two slides”  Requires a long answer and is not critical understanding?  Say “Good point; I’ll come back to it at the end of the talk.” 73
  • 74. Major Interruptions During Your Presentation  If most in the audience are non-specialists  Explain the issue to the audience  Delay discussion until after the talk  If most of the audience is knowledgeable  Make your point as clearly as you can  Discuss it out – don’t try to diminish or avoid it 74
  • 75. Running Out of Slides  Short talks are better than ones that are too long  What to do: Don’t make a personal comment  “hum, I’m running out of slides …” Stretch it a little -- see if you can think of an example, or story, to bolster your points Conclude unhurriedly, summarizing your main points, but don’t be repetitious 75
  • 76. Running Out of Time  Avoid this – impolite to other speakers and the audience: if it happens … Do not assume that you can carry on past your time Do not skip all of your slides looking for the right one to put on next Conclude – on time wherever you are in your talk -- by making your main points 76
  • 77. Questions and Answers  Questions after your talk can be difficult but they definitely help you in writing up your research Identifies parts the audience did not understand Focuses and adds dimension to your analysis 77
  • 78. Questions and Answers  You can repeat the question This gives you time to think The rest of the audience may not have heard the question Also if you heard the question incorrectly, it presents an opportunity for clarification 78
  • 79. Questions and Answers, continued  Keep your answers short and to the point – don’t respond with another lecture  Don’t say that a question is bad, or that you addressed it already Rephrase it into something that you want to talk about The research world is smaller than you think and you will continue to encounter people throughout your career 79
  • 80. Difficult Questions  First of all:  Usually you have thought more about the material than anyone else -- this puts you in a stronger position than you may think 80
  • 81. Difficult Questions  Anticipate typical questions and prepare for them Generalizability of your findings to other times? Other places? Other conditions? Methodological bias? Uncertainties? Exceptions? Priorities?  Still concerned about questions? Make extra slides – perhaps on details of instrumentation or methodology 81
  • 82. Difficult Questions, continued  If you really don't know the answer Say "Interesting, I will look into that" or “That’s a good point, let’s discuss it afterwards” Don't feel that you have to invent an answer on the fly -- you are only human and you can't have thought of everything 82
  • 83. Conclusions  Structure your content in a way that is comfortable for you  Use your own style to your advantage  Think ahead about where you might encounter difficulties and figure out ways to overcome them 83
  • 84. 84 ANY QUESTIONS? IMPORTANT: In two weeks ! Bring you presentation on a memory stick Or email it to me by Dec. 3rd !

Editor's Notes

  • #4: John Ridley Stroop March 21 1897 Tennessee farm 2 nd youngest of 6 Poorly didn’t do heavy work on farm Top of class @ school Kitrell County school David Lipscomb College in Nashville Initial financial support: father sold 2 cows & a horse Stroop helped finance self by growing and selling a crop of potatoes the summer before college. Dec 23 1921, 2 nd yr @ college married Zelma Dunn Over 7 yrs whilst he at Uni, 3 sons. To support family, Stroop taught @ David Lipscomb college, worked as janitor & as librarian, taught high school, & built his own house. B.S. In 1924, M.A. 1925, PhD in Exptal Psych 1933 (supervisor Joseph Peterson) Continued to work @ David Lipscomb College – taught, Registrar, Chair of Psych for 16 yrs (1948-1964) 1 st to combine word & object property dimensions -> response conflict. !935 paper little impact at the time – behaviourism prevalent; 1960’s info processing & cog psych Stroop’s work rediscovered. Used to highlight goal of examining stages of mental processing thro analysis of response time. Still widely studied today