Structure The Class Environment To Support Active Learning

Structure The Class Environment To
Support Active Learning
The actions of an instructor on the first day of class will set the tone for the rest of
the semester. If you have expectations of lively student interactions within a
warm, supportive environment, then you must begin to develop that atmosphere
in the initial class period. Consider the following:
- Engage in activities designed to introduce class members to each other. Ice
breakers do two things: 1) they help get students used to speaking in front of the
group (public speaking is one of the most common fears that people have); 2)
they help students get to know each other, thereby making them feel more
comfortable. Perhaps the most useful format is to have students pair off and
interview each other. In the two to five minutes allotted to each, students find
out salient facts about their partners—where they're from, what their hobbies
are, why they're taking the class, etc. If the group is thirty or less, there is
sufficient time for individuals to introduce each other to the entire class. If the
class is larger, have the students introduce each other in two or more subgroups.
Even very large classes in amphitheaters with fixed seats can use this technique:
have students use subgroups of eight. Pairs interview each other outside class and
come prepared for introductions at the next meeting. If one of your goals is to

promote writing, the students can be asked to write brief biographies of their
partners. Depending upon the subject matter, these introductions can often serve
to illustrate themes of the course.
- Provide a detailed syllabus outlining your expectations at the first class meeting.
Research has consistently shown that a principal characteristic of a good teacher
is clarity and organization of course material as well as predictability of actions.
Providing clear and consistent expectations to students on the first day helps to
establish rapport, for it reduces the inherent power relationship between student
and instructor. This is particularly true regarding grades.
Establishing these expectations can be a way to familiarize students with class
discussion techniques to be used later in the course. For instance, students could
use the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) model to critique the syllabus. Students 1) read
the syllabus, hunting for points that need clarification; 2) compare findings with a
partner's; and 3) engage in a large class discussion, led by the instructor, designed
to ensure that any ambiguity in the syllabus is resolved.
- Provide opportunities for success. If students experience success as early as
possible in a course, they become motivated and look forward to further
explorations of the material.
Students reflect and write individually, then share their responses in groups of
three, and finally engage in a discussion with the whole class. The questions are
framed so that everyone could contribute out of their experiences while
identifying with the text. In later sessions, students learned to "deepen and
systematize" the process of textual exegesis that they had successfully begun
during their first class. The implication for every instructor is whether we like it or
not, a major question all students have is "How will I be graded?" that students
should be exposed to the processes of our disciplines in such a way as to arouse
their curiosity.
Systematically promote student participation.
- Use active learning strategies as often as possible. Students need to be helped in
overcoming their resistance to active participation. Some reasons why students
hesitate to participate in class are: 1) since lecturing is the dominant teaching
strategy, students are conditioned to be passive; 2) the fear of speaking in public
is common among students; and 3) students are afraid to appear "stupid" in front

of their peers or the instructor. Given these circumstances, students need
frequent practice in active learning strategies so that they may become proficient
and confident in their use of them. Short, low-risk activities such as discussions
built around appropriate editorials or even short summaries of the lecture can be
introduced every day. Within a few weeks, active participation by most students
becomes the norm.
There is some controversy about whether instructors should force students to
participate in discussion by calling on them. Indeed, one study suggests this
practice is viewed negatively by students. Personal experience suggests the
opposite, however, if a climate of trust has been established and students are
allowed to "pass" on answering questions if they so desire. Shy students have
often remarked that, once they overcame their initial terror, they appreciated
being made part of the group. If you have doubts, at least ensure that those who
are hesitant are assigned roles that quietly allow them to participate: note-taking,
summarizing, etc.
- Structure the physical class environment. Ask to be assigned to classes and
classrooms that are conducive to active learning, if such are available. The ideal
situation for interactive learning would be classes of twenty in classrooms with
movable chairs so that discussions could take place in groups of any size.
Unfortunately, the physical constraints under which we often work can inhibit
interaction among students. It is difficult to develop a warm, supportive
atmosphere in an amphitheater with 600 students in fixed seats. There are
strategies, however, which can be used in a classroom of any size. As suggested
earlier, break the class down into manageable groups: pairs or groups of three
can be used in classes of any size. Hold a discussion with a portion of the class
while others listen. Ask for their comments later. Ingenuity and flexibility can
mitigate many obstacles that stand in your way.
Develop a climate that supports risk taking.
- Role models. Students are more likely to take risks if they see that the instructor
is willing to take risks as well. By the way you handle errors and wrong turns, you
demonstrate to students that even experts make mistakes. This willingness to
demonstrate vulnerability is difficult to develop. Most of us remember when we
first began teaching and believed that we had to adopt the role of "authority" in
the classroom and were fearful of having our newly-minted professional status
challenged by admitting a mistake. Those engaged in active learning, however,

must learn to adopt an additional role, that of facilitator, or better yet, co-
investigator. Students are aware of these roles, even if we have not articulated
them to ourselves.
- Ensure that your responses to student participation are supportive. Several
confirming verbal responses are: a) Directly acknowledge a student's contribution
or feelings. b) When possible, agree with portions or all of a student's
contribution. If criticism appears warranted, try deflecting the response to
another student for comment. A caveat is necessary. There are times in a
discussion when you want to draw out a particular topic until it is fully developed.
Telling a student that his response is correct sometimes shuts down contributions
from others. c) Clarify the students' feelings or the content they have presented
("As I understand what you are saying, you believe . . ."). d) Provide encouraging,
reassuring statements to students as they work through a difficult problem. This
supportive feedback should appear on written work as well. Some instructors
even provide a periodic, personalized letter summarizing a student's contributions
during the semester.
We suggest using supportive nonverbal behaviors when engaged in class
discussion: a) face the speaker; b) make eye contact or focus on the speaker
slightly below the eyes; c) lean or bend slightly toward the speaker; d) take notes
on those points presented that you should refer to later as a reinforcement of
their importance; e) wait three to five seconds after the student stops speaking to
show that you are considering what has been said. In addition, be aware of other
aspects of your body language. Most importantly, appear relaxed and smile.
- Interactions with students. One of the most important things you can do to
develop a warm, supportive atmosphere in the classroom is to learn student
names as quickly as possible. Although class size may be a limiting factor, there
are strategies that simplify the process. For instance, make a seating chart and
review names while students are engaged in active learning activities. Another
approach is to hand out assignments while looking closely at names and faces as
you do so. The simple act of learning names clearly shows that you are interested
in students as individuals.
Similarly, self-disclosure by the professor greatly personalizes the classroom as
students become privy to the humanity of the instructor. Students are particularly
appreciative of instructors who use personal examples to illustrate the material or
to discuss experiences they have had outside class—as long as the stories are

pertinent to the college courses. They also are responsive to such actions as
making an open admission when material becomes confusing or interjecting
humor where appropriate. Indeed, one of the most powerful tools for
establishing student-instructor rapport is the ability to laugh at oneself.
- Use power constructively. Communication research suggests that an instructor
has various types of power at his or her disposal in the classroom, if the students
"perceive it to exist and accept it." We can list five types of power available to a
teacher:
a) Coercive Power is based on students' perceptions that they will be punished
if they do not conform to a teacher's requests.
b) Reward Power is the power based on a student's perception that the teacher
can reward him or her for compliance with the instructor's desires.
c) Legitimate power is the power assigned by students to the instructor in a
classroom as a function of his or her role as a "teacher."
d) Referent power stems from a student's relationship with a teacher—the
extent of the power depends on how much a student wants to identify with and
please the instructor.
e) Expert power stems from the student's perception that the teacher is
knowledgeable about the discipline.
Communication of power in the classroom has an important effect upon student
cognitive and affective learning. The use of coercive power, and to a lesser extent
the use of legitimate power, retarded both cognitive and affective learning in
students. The use of referent power, and to a lesser extent expert power,
enhanced student learning. Students reported significantly more use of coercive
power and significantly less use of expert power than did the teachers. Instructors
should try to avoid the use of coercive or legitimate power and instead should
emphasize the use of referent power by developing positive relationships with
students through the strategies discussed in this essay.
Academic controversy in the college classroom.
Every college instructor may wish to remember that (a) conflicts are inevitable
and (b) conflicts have many potentially positive outcomes. In most if not all
subject areas, no matter what you do, students will disagree with each other and
even with the authorities in the field. Intellectual controversy exists when one
student's ideas, information, conclusions, theories, and opinions are incompatible

with those of another, and the two seek to reach an agreement. The goal of
controversy is for the individuals involved to reach the best reasoned judgment
possible by giving all points of view a fair and complete hearing and viewing the
issue from all perspectives.
While the controversy process occurs naturally, it may be considerably enhanced
when teachers structure it in academic situations. Structuring controversy in
lessons can result in greater motivation to learn, higher achievement, greater
retention, more frequent higher-level reasoning, more creative thinking and
problem-solving, and more constructive social and cognitive development. There
are so many advantages to intellectual conflict in the classroom that it is hard to
understand why instructors use it so infrequently. One reason may be that they
do not know that they are supposed to create intellectual conflict as part of the
educational experience. Another reason may be that they do not know how to do
so.
Utilizing the power of conflict to focus students' attention on what is to be
learned, generating continuing motivation to learn and inquire, creating a need
for improved conceptual frameworks, and generating more creative and higher-
quality decisions begin with realizing that conflict potentially has many positive
outcomes and is essential to learning. Traditionally, many colleges have viewed
conflict as being destructive and tried to avoid and suppress it in the classroom.
Instead, faculty must create, seek out, and structure intellectual conflict in order
to maximize student learning and motivation. Conflicts can be constructive if
managed skillfully. Conflict can lead to integrative problem solving that creates
positive outcomes for everyone involved.
Cognitive and Moral Development
Constructively managed conflict not only increases achievement and motivation,
it also is essential for cognitive and moral growth. A wide variety of
developmental psychologists have proposed that conflict is an inherent part of
healthy growth.
When individuals cooperate, socio-cognitive conflict occurs and creates cognitive
disequilibrium, which leads to a need to verify one's information and reasoning,
which results in the development of logic, all of which stimulates perspective-
taking ability and cognitive and moral development. A person's need for logic
arises from being confronted with opposing ideas, which leads to doubt and a

desire to verify. Cognitive and moral reasoning advance the more frequently
controversy occurs during cooperative endeavors.
Controversy, Effective Decision Making, and Healthy Organizations
The need for controversy, and some of the destructive consequences of trying to
make decisions without disagreement and intellectual challenge, are found in the
examples of decision-making fiascoes documented. Groupthink is the collective
striving for unanimity that overrides group members' motivation realistically to
appraise alternative courses of action and, thereby, leads to (a) deterioration of
mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment and (b) ignoring external
information inconsistent with the favored alternative course of action.
Groupthink leads to concurrence seeking where group members inhibit discussion
in order to avoid any disagreement or arguments, emphasize agreement, and
avoid realistic appraisal of alternative ideas and courses of action. Quick
compromises and censorship of disagreement are characteristic of groups
dominated by concurrence seeking.
How to make an organization conflict-positive rather than conflict-negative:
(a) documenting the process of controversy (uncertainty results from being
challenged by others)
(b) identifying the conditions under which controversy results in positive or
negative outcomes (in a cooperative context, positive outcomes tend to result
while in a competitive context, negative outcomes tend to result).
Poor decisions are often made for a number of reasons. One is that group
members quickly decide on a solution based on their dominant response and,
therefore, do not think of the proper alternatives or do a poor job of evaluating
and choosing among the alternatives being considered. A second is that even
when group members identify the proper alternatives, group members often do a
poor job of evaluating and choosing among the alternatives. Controversy corrects
for these two flaws in decision making. In addition, they conclude that
controversy results in more creative solutions and more member satisfaction
compared to group decision making without controversy. Controversy encourages
group members to dig into a problem, raise issues, and settle them in ways that
show the benefits of a wide range of ideas being used. Controversies also result in
a high degree of emotional involvement in and commitment to solving the
problems the group is working on. Groups with heterogeneous members are

often more effective than homogeneous groups because with heterogeneity
come more frequent natural controversies.
General Field of Group Dynamics
Whether individuals' views are challenged by a majority or by a minority of group
members has important implications on the outcomes of controversy. Majorities
typically exert more influence than do minorities through compliance or
conversion. Minorities convert through validating their position. Those exposed to
minority views are stimulated to attend to more aspects of the situation, they
think in more divergent ways, and they are more likely to detect novel solutions
or come to new decisions. On the balance, these solutions and decisions are
"better" or "more correct."
The broad field of group dynamics provides numerous bodies of research in the
areas of goals and motivation, minority influence, leadership, communication,
power and diversity, that support the theory of controversy. The central role of
controversy in effective decision making and creative problem solving is discussed
in depth.
It is vital for citizens in a democracy to seek reasoned judgment on the complex
problems facing our society. Structured academic controversies are a vital
instructional tool that teaches the skills students need to be responsible citizens
in a democracy, resolve civil justice issues without going to court, and improve
their academic achievement.
Use behaviors that promote student learning.
- Be aware of supportive behaviors and selectively emphasize those with which
you are comfortable. Using humor, praising student performance, and engaging
students in conversations outside class are particularly important in contributing
to learning. Other behaviors significant for learning are: self-disclosure by the
teacher; encouraging students to talk; asking questions about student's
viewpoints or feelings; following up on topics raised by students even if they were
not directly related to the material; referring to "our" class and what "we" are
doing; providing constructive feedback on student work; asking for student
opinions about assignments, due dates or discussion topics; and inviting students
to telephone or meet him or her outside class if they want to discuss something.
Interestingly, as class size increased, certain behaviors became more significant, in

a comparison of small classes (1-25 students) with mid-sized classes (26-50
students). Specifically, self-disclosure, asking questions and encouraging student
responses, and using the referents "our" and "we" became increasingly important
with regard to cognitive and affective learning. Addressing students by name and
asking for viewpoints followed the same pattern, particularly for affective
learning. The conscious use of these behaviors by an instructor, therefore, can
have a significant impact on the college classroom.
- Aspire to becoming a master teacher. Those who developed a high degree of
interpersonal rapport with students are "extremely warm and open," "highly
student-centered" and "predictable." An observer watching teacher behaviors in
the classroom would see someone:
a) who is very interested in students as individuals;
b) who is very sensitive to student responses to the material or its presentation;
c) who encourages students to state their opinions about matters of
assignments and class policy and, upon occasion, will poll them on their
preferences;
d) who encourages students to ask questions, to formulate their views, and
seems genuinely interested in what they have to say;
e) who lets students know that their understanding of the material is important
to the instructor; and
f) who encourages students to become creative, independent thinkers.
Although most of us may never reach the goal of becoming a master teacher, we
can be knowledgeable about—and practice—those behaviors that create a
supportive environment and promote student learning.
Change your approach systematically.
Modifying how we teach is a difficult process. If approached systematically,
however, the chances for making lasting changes are greatly improved. Consider
implementing the following approach: a) Develop an awareness of how you
teach. What strategies do you use? How often? What behaviors do you exhibit?
b) Gather information on those areas of interest. Have a colleague observe you or
have students provide feedback. c) Decide what specific changes you want to
attempt. d) Slowly and systematically incorporate those changes into your
classroom. e) Assess the effectiveness of the changes and loop back to "b)" if
necessary. These steps, if diligently applied, can enhance and perhaps even
transform our teaching effectiveness.

Jeff Palmer is a teacher, success coach, trainer, Certified Master of Web
Copywriting and founder of https://Ebookscheaper.com. Jeff is a prolific writer,
Senior Research Associate and Infopreneur having written many eBooks, articles
and special reports.
Source: https://ebookscheaper.com/structure-the-class-environment-to-
support-active-learning/

Structure The Class Environment To Support Active Learning

More Related Content

Similar to Structure The Class Environment To Support Active Learning (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Structure The Class Environment To Support Active Learning