Study of Radiation Interaction Mechanisms of Different Nuclear Detectors

International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-5, Issue-7, Jul-2019]
https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.577 ISSN: 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 471
Study of Radiation Interaction Mechanisms of
Different Nuclear Detectors
M. N. Islam1, H. Akhter2, M. Begum3, M. S. Alam4 and M. Kamal5
1,2,3
Electronics Division, Atomic Energy Centre, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box No. 164, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
4
Instituteof Electronics, Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Bangladesh Atomic Energy, Commission, G.P.O Box 3787, Savar,
Dhaka, Bangladesh.
5
Physical Science Division, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, P.O. Box No. 158, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
E-mail: nislam_baec@yahoo.com
Abstract— In this paper,an attempt has been made to describe the radiation interaction mechanisms of nuclear
detectors. There are lots of radioactive detectors available in the field of radiation detection and measurements
instruments/systems such as Geguier Muller (GM) Tube, Scintillation Counter, High Purity Germanium (HPGe)
and so on. Each of these detectors have different and distinct radiation interaction mechanisms and detecting
principle for processing each type of radiation measurement (qualititative and quantitative).The interaction
mechanisms of these detectors are governed by generation of ions (positive and negative) in case of GM tube;
the photo-electric effect, Compton scattering and pair production for Scintillation detector and HPGe along with
diode principle.The special feature of this diode is a constant current generator depending on the energy of the
photon deposition in the detector. The characteristics of these interaction mechanisms have been presented
along with intensity of measurements, efficiency and detector resolution (FWHM).
Keywords—Radiation Interactions, Radiation Measurements, Nuclear Detectors, Photo-electric Effect
Compton Scattering and Pair Production.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nuclear detectors are devices that convert the energy of a
photon or incident particle into an electric pulse [1].These
detectors fall into two categories: gross counters and
energy sensitive. Gross counters count each event
(gamma or neutron) emission the same regardless of
energy. Energy sensitive detectors, used in radio-isotope
identification devices (RIIDs), analyze a radioactive
isotope’s distinct gamma energy emissions and attempt to
identify the source of the radiation [2]. Gamma rays and
x-rays ionize the gas indirectly by interacting with the
metal wall of the GM tube via the photoelectric effect,
Compton scattering or pair production in such a way that
an electron is "knocked" off the inner wall of the detector.
The electric field created by the potential difference
between the anode and cathode causes the negative
member of each ion pair to move to the anode while the
positively charged gas atom or molecule is drawn to the
cathode. If the electric field in the chamber is of sufficient
strength approximately 106 V/m these electrons gain
enough kinetic energy to ionize the gas and create
secondary ion pairs. The result is that each electron from
a primary ion pair produces a cascade or avalanche of ion
pairs [3]. When ionizing radiation enters a scintillator, it
produces a fluorescent flash with short decay time. This is
known as scintillation. In the case of gamma rays, this
scintillation occurs as a result of excitations of bound
electrons by means of free electrons in the scintillator.
These free electrons are generated by following three
mutual interactions photoelectric effect, Compton
scattering or pair production. The probability of
occurrence of such interactions depends on type of
scintillator and the energy of the Gamma rays [4]. The
purpose of an HPGe detector is to convert gamma rays
into electrical impulses which can be used, with suitable
signal processing, to determine their energy and intensity.
All HPGe radiation detectors are either coaxial HPGe,
well-type HPGe or broad energy HPGe (BEGe) just large,
reverse-biased diodes. The germanium material can be
either "n-type" or "p-type". The type depends on the
concentration of donor or acceptor atoms in the crystal[5].
II. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Gamma Interaction Mechanism
Four major interaction mechanisms play an important role
in the measurement of photons. These mechanisms are:
photoelectric effect, coherent scattering, incoherent
scattering and pair production. The photon energy of
major interest for environmental spectrometry studies
ranges between a few keV and 1500 keV. The term "low
energy" will be used here for the energy range 1 to 100
keV, "medium energy" for energies between 100 and 600

keV and "high energy" for energies between 600 and
1500 keV.
2.1.1: Photoelectric Effect
In the photoelectric effect, there is a collision between a
photon and an atom resulting in the ejection of a bound
electron. The photon disappears completely, i.e. all its
energy, Ep, is transferred to the electron. The amount of
energy, Ee, which is transferred to the electron can be
calculated if the binding energy, Eb, of the ejected
electron is known:
Ee = Ep - Eb (1)
2.1.2: Coherent Scattering
In the coherent scattering process no energy is transferred
to the atom. The electromagnetic field of the photon sets
atomic electrons into vibration. The electrons then re-emit
radiation of the same magnitude as the interacting photon
and mainly in the forward direction. The cross-section for
coherent scattering decreases rapidly with increasing
photon energy. This process can be neglected for photon
energies above 100 keV. The differential cross section per
atom for this process as a function of scattering angle θ is
written as follows:
(2)
with the parameter x defined as:
(3)
Where r0 is the classical electron radius, F(x, Z) is the
atomic form factor and λ is the photon wavelength.
2.1.3: Incoherent or Compton scattering
In the incoherent or Compton scattering process, only a
portion of the photon energy is transferred to an electron.
The remaining energy appears as a secondary photon. The
direction (scattering angle theta) and energy of the
secondary photon, Ep', are related by the following
equation:
(4)
With α defined as
(5)
Where m0 is the rest mass for an electron and c the speed
of light in vacuum.
2.1.4: Pair Production
The pair production mechanism only occurs for photon
energies above 1022 keV. Here photons are converted to
electron-positron pairs under the effect of the field of a
nucleus. Since one electron and one positron are formed,
the photons must have energies equivalent to at least two
electronic masses (2 x 511 keV) and the excess photon
energy is shared between the created electron and
positron pair. The annihilation of the positrons produces
two photons in opposite directions, each with 511 keV.
The total cross-section for this process increases with
energy above the threshold energy.
(6)
The total probability of interaction per unit path length for
a photon is proportional to the sumof the total individual
cross-sections [6].
2.2: Detector Bias Power Supply
Generally it is a high voltage power supply with enough
current capacity to feed the detector without any loose in
regulation. The ripple should be less than 100 mV. For
stable operation of the detector in any measurement
system, it needs bias voltages ranges from 400-1000V for
GM Tube; 1000-3000V for Scintillation and 3000-5000V
for HPGe.
2.3: Count Rate Consideration
Generally, a -radiation from a 60Co source is specified to
characterize the almost all types of detectors. A source
with an activity of around 37000 Bq (1 Ci) could be
used. The choice of detector in any count rate application
depends not only on the systemelectronics but also on the
count rates. The count rate can be classified as below:
 Low — Below 100 cps
 High — Above 75,000 cps input rate
 Very High — Above 100,000 cps [5]
The GM tube is suitable for the first count rate;
scintillation for the second and HPGe for low to very
high.
2.4: Detector Sensitivity & efficiency
2.4.1: Sensitivity
The sensitivity, S, to γ-
of the number of counts per second, N, obtained and the
exposure rate, X .
(7)

Generally, it is specified for a Cobalt-60 source produces
an exposure rate X in R/hr. The sensitivity can vary
widely, between 0.2 cps/mR/hr and 240 cps/mR/hr,
depending on the detector model [1].
2.4.2: Quantum efficiency and Collection efficiency
The photomultiplier tube output current Ip of NaI (T1)
Scintillator is given by
(8)
Where
N = Amount of light flash per event produced from
scintillator
= Quantum efficiency of photocathode (assumed to be
25%)
α= Collection efficiency of photomultiplier tube (assumed
to be 90%)
= Gain of photomultiplier tube
e= Electron charge
s= Decay time of NaI (TI)
From Eq. 2.4.2 Quantum efficiency of photocathode and
Collection efficiency of photomultiplier tube can be
derived as follows[4]:
(9)
and
(10)
2.4.3:Absolute efficiency
The absolute detector efficiency at that energy is
calculated by dividing the net count rate in the full-energy
peak by the decay corrected gamma-ray-emission rate of
the standard source. Efficiency curves were constructed
from these full-energy-peak efficiencies.
(11)
( ) std Count of soil sample with standard solution, ( )
sample Count of soil sample without standard solution, ( )
BG Count of background, ( ) theo, Counting of gamma ray
of used standard solution, t is the time of decay, t1/2 is
half-life of the radionuclide [7].
2.5: Detector Resolution
2.5.1:Scintillation Counting
There are two measurement methods available in
Scintillation Counting. One is spectrum method and the
other is counting method. In the spectrum method, pulse
height discrimination is important to determine
photopeaks produced by various types of radiation. This
is evaluated as Energy Resolution or Pulse Height
Resolution(PHR).
The energy resolution is defined by the following
equation as shown fig.1.It is generally expressed as a
percentage.
(12)
R= Energy Resolution
P= Peak Value
P= FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum) [4].
Fig.1: Definition of Energy Resolution.
2.5.2: High Purity Germanium (HPGe)
Energy resolution is the dominant characteristic of a
germanium detector. Gamma-ray spectrometry using high
purity germanium detector is enhanced by the excellent
energy resolution which can help to separate and resolve
various close energy gamma-ray peaks in a complex
energy spectrum. The full width at half maximum of the
full energy peak known as FWHM and sometimes
referred as a measure of energy resolution. The units of
FWHM are expressed in KeV for Ge detector and are
defined at specific, characteristic full energy peaks
associated with standard sources such as 662 KeV for a
Pulse Height(Energy)
P
 P
H
CountRate

137Cs source or 1332 KeV for a 60Co source. The energy
resolution of the germanium detector can affected by the
number of electron-hole pairs created in the detector,
incomplete charge collection and electronic noise
contributions.The effect of these three factors depends on
the properties of the detector and the gamma-ray energy
[8].
2.6: Discussion
The radiation interaction mechanisms for Geguier Muller
(GM) Tube, Scintillation Counter, High Purity
Germanium (HPGe) detectors have been presented in this
study. Although these three different nuclear detectors
having different operating principles and specific
applications but the four major interaction mechanisms
viz. photoelectric effect, coherent scattering, incoherent
scattering and pair production dominate the detection
process.
And these interaction mechanisms have been described in
sub-section 2.1.The detector bias power supply for these
three detectors also vary chronologically from 400V to
5000V as shown in sub-section 2.2 .In case of count rate
consideration for the same detectors, HPGe would be the
superior with respect to two others. According to sub-
section 2.3, this detector is suitable for both low to very
high energy gamma rays, the GM Tube is at the bottom
and scintillation counter stands in between position of
them. Regarding performance evaluation, the GM tube
belongs to sensitivity rather than efficiency
but the terminology ‘efficiency’ goes well with the rest of
two detectors. Quantum efficiency of photocathode and
Collection efficiency of photomultiplier tube are
important for scintillation counter. The absolute detector
efficiency of HPGe is important than intrinsic or relative
efficiency.
III. CONCLUSION
An elaborate study of radiation interaction mechanisms of
different nuclear detectors like GM tube, Scintillation
counter and HPGe have been presented in this research.
Moreover, range of detector bias voltages and count rate
considerations from low to very high energy also have
been presented sufficiently. Detector sensitivity and
efficiency have been discussed as well. The study would
be helpful hints for the design and detecting principle of
nuclear detectors.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors wish to express deep gratitude to Mr. Mahbubul
Hoq, Chairman, Mr. Masud Kamal, Member (Physical
Science), Dr. Imtiaz Kamal, Member (Planning and
Development), Dr. Md. Sanowar Hossain, Member (Bio-
Science) and Engr. Md. Abdus Salam, Member
(Engineering), Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission,
Dhaka for their support and cooperation in the research.
REFERENCES
[1] Test Procedure for Geiger-Mueller Radiation Detectors,
MRNI-501, REV.: D0, December 2008, Available on line
2012.
[2] White Paper, Why High-Purity Germanium (HPGe)
Radiation Detection Technology is Superior to Other
Detector Technologies for Isotope Identification.
http://www.ortec online.com/papers/la_ur_03_4020.pdf.
Available online 2013.
[3] M. Nazrul Islam, A.K.M. S. Islam Bhuian, Masud Kamal,
Kh. Asaduzzaman1 and Mahbubul Hoq, Design and
Development of a 6-Digit Microcontroller Based Nuclear
Counting System, International Journal of Scientific
Research and Management, Vol. 1, Issue 6, ISSN: 2321 -
3418, Valley International, September 2013.
[4] Chapter 7, Scintillation Counting, Available on line 2012.
[5] ORTEC, The Best Choice of High Purity Germanium
(HPGe) Detector, www.ortec online.com, Available on-line
2013.
[6] F. J. Hernandez “Optimization of environmental gamma
spectrometry using Monte Carlo methods” Ph.D. thesis,
Uppsala University, Sweden. 2002.
[7] S. Harb, K. Salahel Din and A. abbady, Study of
Efficiency Calibrations of HPGe Detectors for
Radioactivity Measurements of Environmental Samples,
Proceedings of the 3rd
Environmental Physics Conference,
Aswan, Egypt- 207 -19-23 Feb. 2008.
[8] Nurul Absar “Study of the Radioactivity in Soil and Tea
Leaf and Transfer Factor of Radionuclides”, M.Phil. thesis,
Chittagong University, Bangladesh, 2012.

Study of Radiation Interaction Mechanisms of Different Nuclear Detectors

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Study of Radiation Interaction Mechanisms of Different Nuclear Detectors (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Study of Radiation Interaction Mechanisms of Different Nuclear Detectors