SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                      www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

          SubArtex Spaces Of an Artex Space Over a Bi-monoid


                                     K.Muthukumaran (corresponding auther)

                                                Assistant Professor

           *PG and Research Department Of Mathematics, Saraswathi Narayanan College, Perungudi

                                        Madurai-625022,Tamil Nadu, India

                     Mobile Phone : 9486727007         E-mail : nkmuthukumaran@gmail.com



                                                     M.Kamaraj

                                                Associate Professor

               **Department Of Mathematics, Government Arts College, Melur, Madurai-625106,

                                                 Tamil Nadu, India.

                                    E-mail : kamarajm17366@rediffmail.co.in

ABSTRACT

We define SubArtex Space of an Artex space over a Bi-monoid. We give some examples of SubArtex spaces.
We prove the necessary and sufficient condition for a subset of an Artex space over a bi-monoid to be a
SubArtex space. We prove another equivalent Proposition for the necessary and sufficient condition for a
subset of an Artex space to be a SubArtex space. We prove a nonempty intersection of two SubArtex spaces of
an Artex space over a bi-monoid is a SubArtex space. Also we prove a nonempty intersection of a family of
SubArtex spaces of an Artex space over a bi-monoid is a SubArtex space. Finally, we prove, in this chapter, by
giving an example, that the union of two SubArtex spaces need not be a SubArtex space.

1.INTRODUCTION

Most of the People are interested in relations, not only the blood relations, but also the Mathematical concept
relations. The word relation suggests some familiar examples of relations such as the relation of father to son,
mother to son, brother to sister, etc. Familiar examples in arithmetic are relations such as greater than , less than.
We know the relation between the area of a circle and its radius and between the area of a square and its side.
These examples suggest relationships between two objects. The relation between parents and child is an example
of relation among three objects. This motivated us to think about relation between two different systems and
how there are related or how long they can coincide or how much they can be related or how one system can act
on another system or how one system can penetrate into another system. As a result, we introduced a new
concept in our paper titled “Artex Spaces over Bi-monoids” in the “Research Journal of Pure Algebra”. This
theory was developed from the lattice theory. George Boole introduced Boolean Algebra in 1854. A more
general algebraic system is the lattice. A Boolean Algebra is then introduced as a special lattice. Lattices and
Boolean algebra have important applications in the theory and design of computers. There are many other areas
such as engineering and science to which Boolean algebra is applied. As the theory of Artex spaces over bi-
monoids is developed from lattice theory, we hope, this theory will, in future, play a good role in many fields
especially in science and engineering and in computer fields. In Discrete Mathematics this theory will create a
new dimension. We hope that the theory of Artex spaces over bi-monoids shall lead to many theories. But a
theory can lead only if the theory itself is developed in its own way.

                                                         39
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                     www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

 As a development of it, now, we introduce SubArtex spaces of Artex spaces over bi-monoids. From the
definition of a SubSartex space that we are going to define, it is clear that not every subset of an Artex space
over a bi-monoid is a SubArtex space. The problem that we solve here is to find subsets which qualify to become
SubArtex spaces. In our attempt to solve this problem we find some propositions which qualify subsets to
become SubArtex spaces. These Propoitions will have important applications in the development of the theory of
Artex spaces over bi-monoids.

2.PRELIMINARIES

2.1.0   Definitions

2.1.1 Lattice : A lattice is a partially ordered set (L,≤) in which every pair of elements a,b ϵ L has a greatest
lower bound and a least upper bound.

The greatest lower bound of a and b is denoted by aɅb and the least upper bound of a and b is denoted by avb

2.1.2 Lattice as an Algebraic System : A lattice is an algebraic system (L,Ʌ,V) with two binary operations Ʌ
and V on L which are both commutative, associative, and satisfy the absorption laws namely

aɅ(aVb) = a    and      aV(aɅb) = a

The operations Ʌ and V are called cap and cup respectively, or sometimes meet and join respectively.

2.1.3 Bi-monoid : A system ( M , + , . ) is called a Bi-monoid if

                       1.( M , + ) is a monoid

                       2. ( M , . ) is a monoid and

                       3. a.(b + c) = a.b + a.c   and    (a + b).c = a.c + b.c , for all a,b,c ϵ M

2.2.0   Examples

2.2.1   Let W={0,1,2,3,…}.

         Then (W , + , .), where + and . are the usual addition and multiplication respectively, is a

         bi-monoid.

2.2.2   Let S be any set. Consider P(S), the power set of S.

        Then (P(S) ,ᴜ, ∩) is a bi-monoid.

2.2.3   Let Q’= Q+ ᴜ {0}, where Q+ is the set of all positive rational numbers.

        Then (Q’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid.

2.2.4   Let R’= R+ ᴜ {0}, where R+ is the set of all positive real numbers.

        Then (R’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid.

2.3.0   Definition

2.3.1 Artex Space Over a Bi-monoid : A non-empty set A is said to be an Artex Space Over a bi-monoid
(M , + , . ) if 1.(A, Ʌ ,V) is a lattice and




                                                        40
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                     www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

                    2.for each m ϵ M , mǂ0, and a ϵ A, there exists an element ma ϵ A satisfying the following
conditions :

                    (i)     m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb

                    (ii)    m(a V b) = ma V mb

                    (iii)   ma Ʌ na ≤ (m+n)a and ma V na ≤ (m+n)a

                    (iv) (mn)a = m(na) , for all m,n ϵ M,mǂ0, nǂ0, and a,b ϵ A

                    (v)      1.a = a , for all a ϵ A

Here, ≤ is the partial order relation corresponding to the lattice (A, Ʌ , V)

The multiplication ma is called a bi-monoid multiplication with an artex element or simply bi-monoid
multiplication in A.

Unless otherwise stated A remains as an Artex space with the partial ordering ≤ need not be “less than or equal
to” and M as a bi-monoid with the binary operations + and . need not be the usual addition and usual
multiplication.

2.4.0    Examples

2.4.1    Let W = {0,1,2,3,…} and Z be the set of all integers.

Then ( W , + , . ) is a bi-monoid , where + and . are the usual addition and multiplication respectively.

(Z, ≤) is a lattice in which Ʌ and V are defined by a Ʌ b = mini {a,b} and a V b = maxi {a,b} , for all a,b ϵ Z.

Clearly for each m ϵ W,mǂ0, and for each a ϵ Z, there exists ma ϵ Z.

Also,                (i)    m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb

(ii)    m(a V b) = ma V mb

          (iii)   ma Ʌ na ≤ (m +n)a        and ma V na ≤ (m + n)a

                    (iv) (mn)a = m(na) , for all m,n ϵ W, mǂ0, nǂ0 and a,b ϵ Z

                     (v)     1.a = a , for all a ϵ Z

          Therefore, Z is an Artex Space Over the bi-monoid ( W , + , . )

2.4.2     As defined in Example 2.4.1, Q, the set of all rational numbers is an Artex space over W

2.4.3    As defined in Example 2.4.1, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over W

2.4.4     Let Q’= Q+ ᴜ {0}, where Q+ is the set of all positive rational numbers.

         Then (Q’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid.

         Now as defined in Example 2.4.1, Q, the set of all rational numbers is an Artex space over Q’

2.4.5 Let R’= R+ ᴜ {0}, where R+ is the set of all positive real numbers.

         Then (R’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid.



                                                          41
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                        www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

          As defined in Example 2.4.1, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over R’

2.4.6 As defined in Example 2.4.1, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over Q’

2.4.7     Let A be the set of all sequences (xn) in Z, where Z is the set of all integers and let W = {0,1,2,3,…}.

Define ≤’ ,an order relation, on A by for (xn), (yn) in A, (xn) ≤’ (yn) means xn ≤ yn , for each n,

where ≤ is the usual relation “ less than or equal to “

Clearly ≤’ is a partial order relation on A

Now the cap ,cup operations are defined by the following :

(xn) Ʌ (yn) = (un), where un =mini { xn , yn }, for each n.

(xn) V (yn) = (vn), where vn =maxi { xn , yn }, for each n.

Clearly ( A , ≤’ ) is a lattice.

The bi-monoid multiplication in A is defined by the following :

For each mϵW,mǂ0, and xϵA, where x= (xn), mx is defined by mx = m(xn)=(mxn).

Then clearly A is an Artex space over W.

2.4.8 If B is the set of all sequences (xn) in Q, where Q is the set of all rational numbers, then as in Example
2.4.7, B is an Artex space over W.

2.4.9 As defined in 2.4.8, B is an Artex space over Q’

2.4.10 If D is the set of all sequences (xn) in R, where R is the set of all real numbers, then as in Example 2.4.7,
D is an Artex space over W.

2.4.11 As defined in 2.4.10, D is an Artex space over Q’

2.4.12 As defined in 2.4.10, D is an Artex space over R’.

Proposition 2.5.1 : If A and B are any two Artex spaces over a bi-monoid M and if ≤1 and ≤2 are the partial
ordering on A and B respectively, then AXB is also an Artex Space over M, where the partial ordering ≤ on
AXB and the bi-monoid multiplication in AXB are defined by the following :

    For x,yϵ AXB, where x=(a1,b1) and y=(a2,b2) , x ≤y means a1 ≤1 a2 b1≤2b2

For mϵM, mǂ0, and xϵ AXB, where x=(a,b),the bi-monoid multiplication in AXB is defined by

           mx = m(a,b) = (ma,mb), where ma and mb are the bi-monoid multiplications in A and B respectively.

In other words if Ʌ1 and V1 are the cap, cup of A and Ʌ2 and V2 are the cap, cup of B, then the cap, cup of AXB
denoted by Ʌ and V are defined by x Ʌ y = (a1,b1) Ʌ (a2,b2) = (a1 Ʌ1a2 , b1 Ʌ2b2 ) and xVy = (a1,b1) V (a2,b2) =
(a1V1a2,b1V2b2).

Corollary 2.5.2 : If A1, A2 ,A3,…..., An are Artex spaces over a bi-monoid M, then A1 X A2 X A3 X …..X An is
also an Artex space over M.

3       SubArtex Spaces

3.1 Definition : SubArtex Space : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M , + , . )

                                                              42
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                     www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

Let S be a nonempty subset of A. Then S is said to be a SubArtex space of A

if (S, Ʌ ,V) itself is an Artex space over M.

3.1.0   Examples

3.1.1   As in Example2.4.1, Z is an Artex space over W = {0,1,2,3,…..} and W is a subset of Z.

W itself is an Artex space over W under the operations defined in Z

Therefore, W is a SubArtex space of Z.

3.1.2   As in Example 2.4.2,Q is an Artex space over W = {0,1,2,3,…..} and Z is a subset of Q.

Clearly Z itself is an Artex space over W and therefore Z is a SubArtex space of Q.

W is also a SubArtex space of Q.

3.1.3   As in Example 2.4.3, R is an Artex space over W = {0,1,2,3,…..} and Q is a subset of R

Clearly Q itself is an Artex space over W and therefore Q is a SubArtex space of R over W .

W is also a SubArtex space of R over W.

3.1.4 As defined in Example 2.4.6, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over Q’ and as in Example
2.4.4, Q, the set of all rational numbers is an Artex space over Q’ .

Therefore, Q is a SubArtex space of R over Q’.

3.1.5   In Examples 2.4.7 and 2.4.8, A is a SubArtex space of B over W.

3.1.6   In Examples 2.4.7, 2.4.8 and 2.4.10, A and B are SubArtex spaces of D over W.

3.1.7   In Examples 2.4.9 and 2.4.11, B is a SubArtex space of D over Q’.

Proposition 3.2.1 : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M , + , . )

 Then a nonempty subset S of A is a SubArtex space of A if and only if S is closed under the operations Ʌ,V
and the bi-monoid multiplication in A.

Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M,+, . )

Let S be a nonempty subset of A.

Suppose S is a SubArtex space of A.

         Then S itself is an Artex space over M.

         Therefore, S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A.

         Conversely, suppose S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A.

         As an Artex space, (A, Ʌ ,V) is a lattice.

We know that a non-empty subset S of a lattice (A, Ʌ ,V) is a sublattice iff S is closed under the
operations Ʌ and V.

         By assumption S is closed under the operations Ʌ and V.


                                                        43
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                       www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

         Therefore, (S, Ʌ ,V) is a sublattice and hence a lattice.

         Now, let m ϵ M, mǂ0, and a ϵ S

         By assumption the bi-monoid multiplication in A is also defined in S.

         Therefore, for each m ϵ M, mǂ0, and a ϵ S, ma ϵ S.

Now, let m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S

         Since a,b ϵ S,and S C A, a,b ϵ A.

         Since A is an Artex space over M, m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ A,

         (i)     m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb

         (ii)    m(a V b) = ma V mb

         (iii)   ma Ʌ na ≤ (m+n)a and ma V na ≤ (m+n)a

(iv) (mn)a = m(na)

         (v)      1.a = a

         Therefore, (S, Ʌ ,V) itself is an Artex space over M.

Hence (S, Ʌ ,V) is a SubArtex space of A.

Proposition 3.2.2 : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M , + , . )

Then a nonempty subset S of A is a SubArtex space of A if and only if for each m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and

a, b ϵS,ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S

Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M, + , . )

Let S be a nonempty subset of A.

Suppose S is a SubArtex space of A.

Then S itself is an Artex space over M.

Therefore, for each m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S, ma ϵ S and nb ϵ S

and hence maɅnb ϵ S and maVnb ϵ S .

Conversely, suppose for each m,nϵM, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S.

Since ( M , + , . ) is a bi-monoid, M contains the multiplicative identity, that is, the identity corresponding
to the second operation . in M .

Let 1 be the identity corresponding to the second operation . in M.

Take m=1 and n=1

ma Ʌ nb ϵ S implies 1.a Ʌ 1.b ϵ S

Since a,b ϵS,and S C A, a,bϵA.


                                                          44
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                   www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

Since A is an Artex space over M, 1.a=a and 1.b=b

Therefore,1.a Ʌ 1.b ϵ S implies a Ʌ b ϵ S.

         Similarly, ma V nb ϵ S implies 1.a V 1.b ϵ S and hence a V b ϵ S.

Therefore, S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V

Now, let mϵM, mǂ0, aϵS

By assumption, for each m,nϵM, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵS, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S.

Take n=m and b=a

Then ma Ʌ nb ϵ S implies ma Ʌ ma ϵ S

Since (A, Ʌ ,V) is a lattice, every element is idempotent in A, that is a Ʌ a=a, for all a ϵ A

and hence in S

Therefore, ma Ʌ ma ϵ S implies maϵ S

That is, for each m ϵ M, mǂ0,and a ϵ S, ma ϵ S

Thus S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A.

By Proposition 3.2.1, S is a SubArtex space of A.

Proposition 3.2.3 : A nonempty intersection of two SubArtex spaces of an Artex space A over a

bi-monoid M is a SubArtex space of A.

Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M,+, . )

Let S and T be two SubArtex spaces of A such that S ∩ T is nonempty.

Let B = S ∩ T.

Let m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ B.

a, b ϵ B implies a,b ϵ S and a,b ϵ T.

Since m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, a, b ϵ S, and S is a SubArtex space of A, by Proposition 3.2.2,

ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S

Similarly, since m,nϵM, mǂ0, nǂ0, a, b ϵT, and T is a SubArtex space of A, by Proposition 3.2.2,

ma Ʌ nb ϵ T and ma V nb ϵ T

Therefore, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S∩T = B and ma V nb ϵ S∩T = B

Therefore, by Proposition 3.2.2, B = S ∩ T is a SubArtex space of A.

Hence, a nonempty intersection of two SubArtex spaces is a subartex space.

Proposition 3.2.4 : A nonempty intersection of a family of SubArtex spaces of an Artex space A over a bi-
monoid M is a SubArtex space of A.


                                                         45
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                    www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid ( M,+, . )

Let { Sα / αϵJ } be a family of SubArtex spaces of A such that ∩ Sα is nonempty.

Let S = ∩ Sα

Let m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S.

a,b ϵ S implies a,b ϵ Sα , for each αϵJ.

Since a,b ϵ Sα , for each αϵJ, and Sα is a SubArtex space of A, by Proposition 3.2.2,

ma Ʌ nb ϵ Sα and ma V nb ϵ Sα , for each αϵJ

Therefore, ma Ʌ nb ϵ ∩ Sα and ma V nb ϵ ∩ Sα , for each αϵJ

That is, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ ∩ S

By Proposition 3.2.2, S = ∩ Sα is a SubArtex space of A

Hence, the nonempty intersection of a family of SubArtex spaces of an Artex space A over a         bi-monoid M is
a SubArtex space of A.

4       Problem

4.1.1 Problem : The union of two SubArtex spaces of an Artex space over a bi-monoid need not be a SubArtex
space.

Solution : Let us prove this result by giving an example

    Let R’ = R+ ᴜ {0}, where R+ is the set of all positive real numbers

    and let W = {0,1,2,3,…..}

(R’, ≤) is a lattice in which Ʌ and V are defined by a Ʌ b = mini {a,b} and a V b = maxi {a,b} ,            for
all a,b ϵ R’.

    Clearly for each m ϵ W,mǂ0, and for each aϵ R’, there exists maϵ R’.

    Also, (i)     m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb

(ii)   m(a V b) = ma V mb

          (iii)   ma Ʌ na ≤ (m +n)a        and ma V na ≤ (m + n)a

                    (iv) (mn)a = m(na) , for all m,n ϵ W, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a,b ϵ R’

                     (v)   1.a = a , for all a ϵ R’

    Therefore, R’ is an Artex Space Over the bi-monoid ( W , + , . )

   Generally, if Ʌ1, Ʌ2, and Ʌ3 are the cap operations of A , B and C respectively, then the cap of AXBXC is
denoted by Ʌ and if V1, V2, and V3 are the cup operations of A , B and C respectively, then the cup of AXBXC
is denoted by V

Here, Ʌ1, Ʌ2, and Ʌ3 denote the same meaning minimum of two elements in R’ and V1, V2, and V3 denote the
same meaning maximum of two elements in R’


                                                          46
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                                    www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

Now by Proposition 2.5.1 and Corollary 2.5.2 , R’3 = R’XR’XR’ is an Artex over W, where cap and cup
operations are denoted by Ʌ and V respectively

             Let S = { (a,0,0) / aϵR’ } and Let T = { (0,b,0) / bϵR’ }

  Claim 1:     S is a SubArtex space of R’3

             Let m,nϵW, and mǂ0,nǂ0, and x, y ϵ S, where x = (a1,0,0) and y = (a2,0,0), a1, a2ϵR’

             Now mx Ʌ ny = m(a1,0,0) Ʌ n(a2,0,0)

                              = (ma1,m0,m0) Ʌ (na2,n0,n0)

                              = (ma1,0,0) Ʌ (na2,0,0)

                              = (ma1 Ʌ1na2,0 Ʌ20,0 Ʌ30)

                              = ( ma1 Ʌ1na2, 0 ,0 )

        Since m,nϵW, mǂ0,nǂ0, and a1, a2ϵR’, and R’ is an Artex space over W, ma1 Ʌ1na2 ϵ R’

        Therefore, ( ma1 Ʌ1na2, 0 ,0 ) ϵ S

        That is, mx Ʌ ny ϵ S

Now mx V ny = m(a1,0,0) V n(a2,0,0)

                              = (ma1,m0,m0) V (na2,n0,n0)

                              = (ma1,0,0) V (na2,0,0)

                              = (ma1 V1na2,0 V20,0 V30)

                              = ( ma1 V1na2, 0 ,0 )

        Since m,nϵW, mǂ0,nǂ0, and a1, a2ϵR’, and R’ is an Artex space over W, ma1 V1na2 ϵ R’

        Therefore, ( ma1 V1na2, 0 ,0 ) ϵ S

        That is, mx V ny ϵ S

        Therefore by Proposition 3.2.2, S is a SubArtex space of R’3.

        Hence Claim 1

        Similarly T is a SubArtex space of R’3

        Claim : S ᴜ T is not a SubArtex space of R’3

        Let us take x= (2,0,0) and y = (0,3,0)

        Clearly xϵS and yϵT

        Therefore, x,y ϵ S ᴜ T

        But x V y = (2,0,0)V (0,3,0)

                    = (2V10 , 0V23 , 0V30)


                                                          47
Mathematical Theory and Modeling                                                               www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online)
Vol.2, No.7, 2012

                  = (2,3,0) which does not belong to S ᴜ T

        Therefore, S ᴜ T is not a SubArtex space of R’3

        Hence the union of two SubArtex spaces need not be a SubArtex space.

References : 1. K.Muthukumaran and M.Kamaraj, ”Artex Spaces Over Bi-monoids”, Research Journal Of Pure
Algebra,2(5),May 2012, Pages 135-140.

             2. J.P.Tremblay and R.Manohar, Discrete Mathematical Structures with Applications to Computer
Science, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.

             3. John T.Moore, The University of Florida /The University of Western Ontario, Elements of
Abstract Algebra, The Macmillan Company, Collier-Macmillan Limited, London.




                                                     48
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science,
Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access
Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is
Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.

More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage:
http://www.iiste.org


The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and
collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Prospective authors of
IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page:
http://www.iiste.org/Journals/

The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified
submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than
those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the
journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.

IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners

EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

More Related Content

PDF
A study of derivations on lattices
PDF
Common fixed theorems for weakly compatible mappings via an
PDF
11.common fixed points of weakly reciprocally continuous maps using a gauge f...
PDF
Common fixed points of weakly reciprocally continuous maps using a gauge func...
PDF
Bc4301300308
PDF
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy 2 metric spaces and fuzzy 3-metric spaces
PDF
Some new exact Solutions for the nonlinear schrödinger equation
PDF
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 2 metric spa...
A study of derivations on lattices
Common fixed theorems for weakly compatible mappings via an
11.common fixed points of weakly reciprocally continuous maps using a gauge f...
Common fixed points of weakly reciprocally continuous maps using a gauge func...
Bc4301300308
On fixed point theorems in fuzzy 2 metric spaces and fuzzy 3-metric spaces
Some new exact Solutions for the nonlinear schrödinger equation
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 2 metric spa...

What's hot (15)

PDF
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 3 metric spa...
PDF
PhotonModel
PDF
Common fixed point theorems using faintly compatible
PDF
Steven Duplij, "Higher braid groups and regular semigroups from polyadic bina...
PDF
A.J.Bruce,S.Duplij,"Double-Graded Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics", arxiv:19...
PDF
FUZZY IDEALS AND FUZZY DOT IDEALS ON BH-ALGEBRAS
PDF
a - ANTI FUZZY NEW IDEAL OF PUALGEBRA
ODT
PDF
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
PDF
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES)
PDF
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (14)
PDF
MTH391 Final Paper (1)
PDF
Analytical Solution Of Schrödinger Equation With Mie–Type Potential Using Fac...
PDF
N0747577
PDF
Rough set on concept lattice
Generalized fixed point theorems for compatible mapping in fuzzy 3 metric spa...
PhotonModel
Common fixed point theorems using faintly compatible
Steven Duplij, "Higher braid groups and regular semigroups from polyadic bina...
A.J.Bruce,S.Duplij,"Double-Graded Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics", arxiv:19...
FUZZY IDEALS AND FUZZY DOT IDEALS ON BH-ALGEBRAS
a - ANTI FUZZY NEW IDEAL OF PUALGEBRA
COMMON FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN COMPATIBLE MAPPINGS OF TYPE (P*) OF GENERALIZE...
The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES)
Stability criterion of periodic oscillations in a (14)
MTH391 Final Paper (1)
Analytical Solution Of Schrödinger Equation With Mie–Type Potential Using Fac...
N0747577
Rough set on concept lattice
Ad

Similar to Sub artex spaces of an artex space over a bi monoid (20)

PDF
Some special artex spaces over bi monoids
PDF
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
PDF
Fixed point theorems for four mappings in fuzzy metric space using implicit r...
PDF
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
PDF
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
PDF
Steven Duplij, Raimund Vogl, "Polyadic Braid Operators and Higher Braiding Ga...
PDF
Fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space with e.a property
PDF
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
PDF
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
PDF
Artificial intelligence ai choice mechanism hypothesis of a mathematical method
PDF
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
PDF
Common fixed point theorems with continuously subcompatible mappings in fuzz...
PDF
matrices-1.pdf
PDF
On fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces
PDF
Complete l fuzzy metric spaces and common fixed point theorems
PDF
Mtc ssample05
PDF
Mtc ssample05
PPTX
Physics Assignment Help
PPTX
UNIT III.pptx
Some special artex spaces over bi monoids
amer.math.monthly.124.2.179.pdf
Fixed point theorems for four mappings in fuzzy metric space using implicit r...
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
Semicompatibility and fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space using implici...
Steven Duplij, Raimund Vogl, "Polyadic Braid Operators and Higher Braiding Ga...
Fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric space with e.a property
Fixed Point Theorem in Fuzzy Metric Space
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
Artificial intelligence ai choice mechanism hypothesis of a mathematical method
A common fixed point theorem in cone metric spaces
Common fixed point theorems with continuously subcompatible mappings in fuzz...
matrices-1.pdf
On fixed point theorem in fuzzy metric spaces
Complete l fuzzy metric spaces and common fixed point theorems
Mtc ssample05
Mtc ssample05
Physics Assignment Help
UNIT III.pptx
Ad

More from Alexander Decker (20)

PDF
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
PDF
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
PDF
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
PDF
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
PDF
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
PDF
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
PDF
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
PDF
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
PDF
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
PDF
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
PDF
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
PDF
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
PDF
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
PDF
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
PDF
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
PDF
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
PDF
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
PDF
A survey of provenance leveraged
PDF
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
PDF
A study to measures the financial health of
Abnormalities of hormones and inflammatory cytokines in women affected with p...
A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in
A usability evaluation framework for b2 c e commerce websites
A universal model for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A unique common fixed point theorems in generalized d
A trends of salmonella and antibiotic resistance
A transformational generative approach towards understanding al-istifham
A time series analysis of the determinants of savings in namibia
A therapy for physical and mental fitness of school children
A theory of efficiency for managing the marketing executives in nigerian banks
A systematic evaluation of link budget for
A synthetic review of contraceptive supplies in punjab
A synthesis of taylor’s and fayol’s management approaches for managing market...
A survey paper on sequence pattern mining with incremental
A survey on live virtual machine migrations and its techniques
A survey on data mining and analysis in hadoop and mongo db
A survey on challenges to the media cloud
A survey of provenance leveraged
A survey of private equity investments in kenya
A study to measures the financial health of

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
PDF
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PPT
Teaching material agriculture food technology
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
PDF
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
PPTX
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PDF
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PDF
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
PDF
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PDF
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
PDF
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...
MYSQL Presentation for SQL database connectivity
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
Electronic commerce courselecture one. Pdf
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
Teaching material agriculture food technology
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Optimiser vos workloads AI/ML sur Amazon EC2 et AWS Graviton
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
TokAI - TikTok AI Agent : The First AI Application That Analyzes 10,000+ Vira...
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Empathic Computing: Creating Shared Understanding
Build a system with the filesystem maintained by OSTree @ COSCUP 2025
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
Reach Out and Touch Someone: Haptics and Empathic Computing
Per capita expenditure prediction using model stacking based on satellite ima...

Sub artex spaces of an artex space over a bi monoid

  • 1. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 SubArtex Spaces Of an Artex Space Over a Bi-monoid K.Muthukumaran (corresponding auther) Assistant Professor *PG and Research Department Of Mathematics, Saraswathi Narayanan College, Perungudi Madurai-625022,Tamil Nadu, India Mobile Phone : 9486727007 E-mail : nkmuthukumaran@gmail.com M.Kamaraj Associate Professor **Department Of Mathematics, Government Arts College, Melur, Madurai-625106, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail : kamarajm17366@rediffmail.co.in ABSTRACT We define SubArtex Space of an Artex space over a Bi-monoid. We give some examples of SubArtex spaces. We prove the necessary and sufficient condition for a subset of an Artex space over a bi-monoid to be a SubArtex space. We prove another equivalent Proposition for the necessary and sufficient condition for a subset of an Artex space to be a SubArtex space. We prove a nonempty intersection of two SubArtex spaces of an Artex space over a bi-monoid is a SubArtex space. Also we prove a nonempty intersection of a family of SubArtex spaces of an Artex space over a bi-monoid is a SubArtex space. Finally, we prove, in this chapter, by giving an example, that the union of two SubArtex spaces need not be a SubArtex space. 1.INTRODUCTION Most of the People are interested in relations, not only the blood relations, but also the Mathematical concept relations. The word relation suggests some familiar examples of relations such as the relation of father to son, mother to son, brother to sister, etc. Familiar examples in arithmetic are relations such as greater than , less than. We know the relation between the area of a circle and its radius and between the area of a square and its side. These examples suggest relationships between two objects. The relation between parents and child is an example of relation among three objects. This motivated us to think about relation between two different systems and how there are related or how long they can coincide or how much they can be related or how one system can act on another system or how one system can penetrate into another system. As a result, we introduced a new concept in our paper titled “Artex Spaces over Bi-monoids” in the “Research Journal of Pure Algebra”. This theory was developed from the lattice theory. George Boole introduced Boolean Algebra in 1854. A more general algebraic system is the lattice. A Boolean Algebra is then introduced as a special lattice. Lattices and Boolean algebra have important applications in the theory and design of computers. There are many other areas such as engineering and science to which Boolean algebra is applied. As the theory of Artex spaces over bi- monoids is developed from lattice theory, we hope, this theory will, in future, play a good role in many fields especially in science and engineering and in computer fields. In Discrete Mathematics this theory will create a new dimension. We hope that the theory of Artex spaces over bi-monoids shall lead to many theories. But a theory can lead only if the theory itself is developed in its own way. 39
  • 2. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 As a development of it, now, we introduce SubArtex spaces of Artex spaces over bi-monoids. From the definition of a SubSartex space that we are going to define, it is clear that not every subset of an Artex space over a bi-monoid is a SubArtex space. The problem that we solve here is to find subsets which qualify to become SubArtex spaces. In our attempt to solve this problem we find some propositions which qualify subsets to become SubArtex spaces. These Propoitions will have important applications in the development of the theory of Artex spaces over bi-monoids. 2.PRELIMINARIES 2.1.0 Definitions 2.1.1 Lattice : A lattice is a partially ordered set (L,≤) in which every pair of elements a,b ϵ L has a greatest lower bound and a least upper bound. The greatest lower bound of a and b is denoted by aɅb and the least upper bound of a and b is denoted by avb 2.1.2 Lattice as an Algebraic System : A lattice is an algebraic system (L,Ʌ,V) with two binary operations Ʌ and V on L which are both commutative, associative, and satisfy the absorption laws namely aɅ(aVb) = a and aV(aɅb) = a The operations Ʌ and V are called cap and cup respectively, or sometimes meet and join respectively. 2.1.3 Bi-monoid : A system ( M , + , . ) is called a Bi-monoid if 1.( M , + ) is a monoid 2. ( M , . ) is a monoid and 3. a.(b + c) = a.b + a.c and (a + b).c = a.c + b.c , for all a,b,c ϵ M 2.2.0 Examples 2.2.1 Let W={0,1,2,3,…}. Then (W , + , .), where + and . are the usual addition and multiplication respectively, is a bi-monoid. 2.2.2 Let S be any set. Consider P(S), the power set of S. Then (P(S) ,ᴜ, ∩) is a bi-monoid. 2.2.3 Let Q’= Q+ ᴜ {0}, where Q+ is the set of all positive rational numbers. Then (Q’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid. 2.2.4 Let R’= R+ ᴜ {0}, where R+ is the set of all positive real numbers. Then (R’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid. 2.3.0 Definition 2.3.1 Artex Space Over a Bi-monoid : A non-empty set A is said to be an Artex Space Over a bi-monoid (M , + , . ) if 1.(A, Ʌ ,V) is a lattice and 40
  • 3. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 2.for each m ϵ M , mǂ0, and a ϵ A, there exists an element ma ϵ A satisfying the following conditions : (i) m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb (ii) m(a V b) = ma V mb (iii) ma Ʌ na ≤ (m+n)a and ma V na ≤ (m+n)a (iv) (mn)a = m(na) , for all m,n ϵ M,mǂ0, nǂ0, and a,b ϵ A (v) 1.a = a , for all a ϵ A Here, ≤ is the partial order relation corresponding to the lattice (A, Ʌ , V) The multiplication ma is called a bi-monoid multiplication with an artex element or simply bi-monoid multiplication in A. Unless otherwise stated A remains as an Artex space with the partial ordering ≤ need not be “less than or equal to” and M as a bi-monoid with the binary operations + and . need not be the usual addition and usual multiplication. 2.4.0 Examples 2.4.1 Let W = {0,1,2,3,…} and Z be the set of all integers. Then ( W , + , . ) is a bi-monoid , where + and . are the usual addition and multiplication respectively. (Z, ≤) is a lattice in which Ʌ and V are defined by a Ʌ b = mini {a,b} and a V b = maxi {a,b} , for all a,b ϵ Z. Clearly for each m ϵ W,mǂ0, and for each a ϵ Z, there exists ma ϵ Z. Also, (i) m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb (ii) m(a V b) = ma V mb (iii) ma Ʌ na ≤ (m +n)a and ma V na ≤ (m + n)a (iv) (mn)a = m(na) , for all m,n ϵ W, mǂ0, nǂ0 and a,b ϵ Z (v) 1.a = a , for all a ϵ Z Therefore, Z is an Artex Space Over the bi-monoid ( W , + , . ) 2.4.2 As defined in Example 2.4.1, Q, the set of all rational numbers is an Artex space over W 2.4.3 As defined in Example 2.4.1, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over W 2.4.4 Let Q’= Q+ ᴜ {0}, where Q+ is the set of all positive rational numbers. Then (Q’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid. Now as defined in Example 2.4.1, Q, the set of all rational numbers is an Artex space over Q’ 2.4.5 Let R’= R+ ᴜ {0}, where R+ is the set of all positive real numbers. Then (R’, + , . ) is a bi-monoid. 41
  • 4. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 As defined in Example 2.4.1, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over R’ 2.4.6 As defined in Example 2.4.1, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over Q’ 2.4.7 Let A be the set of all sequences (xn) in Z, where Z is the set of all integers and let W = {0,1,2,3,…}. Define ≤’ ,an order relation, on A by for (xn), (yn) in A, (xn) ≤’ (yn) means xn ≤ yn , for each n, where ≤ is the usual relation “ less than or equal to “ Clearly ≤’ is a partial order relation on A Now the cap ,cup operations are defined by the following : (xn) Ʌ (yn) = (un), where un =mini { xn , yn }, for each n. (xn) V (yn) = (vn), where vn =maxi { xn , yn }, for each n. Clearly ( A , ≤’ ) is a lattice. The bi-monoid multiplication in A is defined by the following : For each mϵW,mǂ0, and xϵA, where x= (xn), mx is defined by mx = m(xn)=(mxn). Then clearly A is an Artex space over W. 2.4.8 If B is the set of all sequences (xn) in Q, where Q is the set of all rational numbers, then as in Example 2.4.7, B is an Artex space over W. 2.4.9 As defined in 2.4.8, B is an Artex space over Q’ 2.4.10 If D is the set of all sequences (xn) in R, where R is the set of all real numbers, then as in Example 2.4.7, D is an Artex space over W. 2.4.11 As defined in 2.4.10, D is an Artex space over Q’ 2.4.12 As defined in 2.4.10, D is an Artex space over R’. Proposition 2.5.1 : If A and B are any two Artex spaces over a bi-monoid M and if ≤1 and ≤2 are the partial ordering on A and B respectively, then AXB is also an Artex Space over M, where the partial ordering ≤ on AXB and the bi-monoid multiplication in AXB are defined by the following : For x,yϵ AXB, where x=(a1,b1) and y=(a2,b2) , x ≤y means a1 ≤1 a2 b1≤2b2 For mϵM, mǂ0, and xϵ AXB, where x=(a,b),the bi-monoid multiplication in AXB is defined by mx = m(a,b) = (ma,mb), where ma and mb are the bi-monoid multiplications in A and B respectively. In other words if Ʌ1 and V1 are the cap, cup of A and Ʌ2 and V2 are the cap, cup of B, then the cap, cup of AXB denoted by Ʌ and V are defined by x Ʌ y = (a1,b1) Ʌ (a2,b2) = (a1 Ʌ1a2 , b1 Ʌ2b2 ) and xVy = (a1,b1) V (a2,b2) = (a1V1a2,b1V2b2). Corollary 2.5.2 : If A1, A2 ,A3,…..., An are Artex spaces over a bi-monoid M, then A1 X A2 X A3 X …..X An is also an Artex space over M. 3 SubArtex Spaces 3.1 Definition : SubArtex Space : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M , + , . ) 42
  • 5. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 Let S be a nonempty subset of A. Then S is said to be a SubArtex space of A if (S, Ʌ ,V) itself is an Artex space over M. 3.1.0 Examples 3.1.1 As in Example2.4.1, Z is an Artex space over W = {0,1,2,3,…..} and W is a subset of Z. W itself is an Artex space over W under the operations defined in Z Therefore, W is a SubArtex space of Z. 3.1.2 As in Example 2.4.2,Q is an Artex space over W = {0,1,2,3,…..} and Z is a subset of Q. Clearly Z itself is an Artex space over W and therefore Z is a SubArtex space of Q. W is also a SubArtex space of Q. 3.1.3 As in Example 2.4.3, R is an Artex space over W = {0,1,2,3,…..} and Q is a subset of R Clearly Q itself is an Artex space over W and therefore Q is a SubArtex space of R over W . W is also a SubArtex space of R over W. 3.1.4 As defined in Example 2.4.6, R, the set of all real numbers is an Artex space over Q’ and as in Example 2.4.4, Q, the set of all rational numbers is an Artex space over Q’ . Therefore, Q is a SubArtex space of R over Q’. 3.1.5 In Examples 2.4.7 and 2.4.8, A is a SubArtex space of B over W. 3.1.6 In Examples 2.4.7, 2.4.8 and 2.4.10, A and B are SubArtex spaces of D over W. 3.1.7 In Examples 2.4.9 and 2.4.11, B is a SubArtex space of D over Q’. Proposition 3.2.1 : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M , + , . ) Then a nonempty subset S of A is a SubArtex space of A if and only if S is closed under the operations Ʌ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A. Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M,+, . ) Let S be a nonempty subset of A. Suppose S is a SubArtex space of A. Then S itself is an Artex space over M. Therefore, S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A. Conversely, suppose S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A. As an Artex space, (A, Ʌ ,V) is a lattice. We know that a non-empty subset S of a lattice (A, Ʌ ,V) is a sublattice iff S is closed under the operations Ʌ and V. By assumption S is closed under the operations Ʌ and V. 43
  • 6. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 Therefore, (S, Ʌ ,V) is a sublattice and hence a lattice. Now, let m ϵ M, mǂ0, and a ϵ S By assumption the bi-monoid multiplication in A is also defined in S. Therefore, for each m ϵ M, mǂ0, and a ϵ S, ma ϵ S. Now, let m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S Since a,b ϵ S,and S C A, a,b ϵ A. Since A is an Artex space over M, m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ A, (i) m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb (ii) m(a V b) = ma V mb (iii) ma Ʌ na ≤ (m+n)a and ma V na ≤ (m+n)a (iv) (mn)a = m(na) (v) 1.a = a Therefore, (S, Ʌ ,V) itself is an Artex space over M. Hence (S, Ʌ ,V) is a SubArtex space of A. Proposition 3.2.2 : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M , + , . ) Then a nonempty subset S of A is a SubArtex space of A if and only if for each m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵS,ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M, + , . ) Let S be a nonempty subset of A. Suppose S is a SubArtex space of A. Then S itself is an Artex space over M. Therefore, for each m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S, ma ϵ S and nb ϵ S and hence maɅnb ϵ S and maVnb ϵ S . Conversely, suppose for each m,nϵM, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S. Since ( M , + , . ) is a bi-monoid, M contains the multiplicative identity, that is, the identity corresponding to the second operation . in M . Let 1 be the identity corresponding to the second operation . in M. Take m=1 and n=1 ma Ʌ nb ϵ S implies 1.a Ʌ 1.b ϵ S Since a,b ϵS,and S C A, a,bϵA. 44
  • 7. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 Since A is an Artex space over M, 1.a=a and 1.b=b Therefore,1.a Ʌ 1.b ϵ S implies a Ʌ b ϵ S. Similarly, ma V nb ϵ S implies 1.a V 1.b ϵ S and hence a V b ϵ S. Therefore, S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V Now, let mϵM, mǂ0, aϵS By assumption, for each m,nϵM, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵS, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S. Take n=m and b=a Then ma Ʌ nb ϵ S implies ma Ʌ ma ϵ S Since (A, Ʌ ,V) is a lattice, every element is idempotent in A, that is a Ʌ a=a, for all a ϵ A and hence in S Therefore, ma Ʌ ma ϵ S implies maϵ S That is, for each m ϵ M, mǂ0,and a ϵ S, ma ϵ S Thus S is closed under the operations Ʌ ,V and the bi-monoid multiplication in A. By Proposition 3.2.1, S is a SubArtex space of A. Proposition 3.2.3 : A nonempty intersection of two SubArtex spaces of an Artex space A over a bi-monoid M is a SubArtex space of A. Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid (M,+, . ) Let S and T be two SubArtex spaces of A such that S ∩ T is nonempty. Let B = S ∩ T. Let m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ B. a, b ϵ B implies a,b ϵ S and a,b ϵ T. Since m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, a, b ϵ S, and S is a SubArtex space of A, by Proposition 3.2.2, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ S Similarly, since m,nϵM, mǂ0, nǂ0, a, b ϵT, and T is a SubArtex space of A, by Proposition 3.2.2, ma Ʌ nb ϵ T and ma V nb ϵ T Therefore, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S∩T = B and ma V nb ϵ S∩T = B Therefore, by Proposition 3.2.2, B = S ∩ T is a SubArtex space of A. Hence, a nonempty intersection of two SubArtex spaces is a subartex space. Proposition 3.2.4 : A nonempty intersection of a family of SubArtex spaces of an Artex space A over a bi- monoid M is a SubArtex space of A. 45
  • 8. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 Proof : Let (A, Ʌ ,V) be an Artex space over a bi-monoid ( M,+, . ) Let { Sα / αϵJ } be a family of SubArtex spaces of A such that ∩ Sα is nonempty. Let S = ∩ Sα Let m,n ϵ M, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a, b ϵ S. a,b ϵ S implies a,b ϵ Sα , for each αϵJ. Since a,b ϵ Sα , for each αϵJ, and Sα is a SubArtex space of A, by Proposition 3.2.2, ma Ʌ nb ϵ Sα and ma V nb ϵ Sα , for each αϵJ Therefore, ma Ʌ nb ϵ ∩ Sα and ma V nb ϵ ∩ Sα , for each αϵJ That is, ma Ʌ nb ϵ S and ma V nb ϵ ∩ S By Proposition 3.2.2, S = ∩ Sα is a SubArtex space of A Hence, the nonempty intersection of a family of SubArtex spaces of an Artex space A over a bi-monoid M is a SubArtex space of A. 4 Problem 4.1.1 Problem : The union of two SubArtex spaces of an Artex space over a bi-monoid need not be a SubArtex space. Solution : Let us prove this result by giving an example Let R’ = R+ ᴜ {0}, where R+ is the set of all positive real numbers and let W = {0,1,2,3,…..} (R’, ≤) is a lattice in which Ʌ and V are defined by a Ʌ b = mini {a,b} and a V b = maxi {a,b} , for all a,b ϵ R’. Clearly for each m ϵ W,mǂ0, and for each aϵ R’, there exists maϵ R’. Also, (i) m(a Ʌ b) = ma Ʌ mb (ii) m(a V b) = ma V mb (iii) ma Ʌ na ≤ (m +n)a and ma V na ≤ (m + n)a (iv) (mn)a = m(na) , for all m,n ϵ W, mǂ0, nǂ0, and a,b ϵ R’ (v) 1.a = a , for all a ϵ R’ Therefore, R’ is an Artex Space Over the bi-monoid ( W , + , . ) Generally, if Ʌ1, Ʌ2, and Ʌ3 are the cap operations of A , B and C respectively, then the cap of AXBXC is denoted by Ʌ and if V1, V2, and V3 are the cup operations of A , B and C respectively, then the cup of AXBXC is denoted by V Here, Ʌ1, Ʌ2, and Ʌ3 denote the same meaning minimum of two elements in R’ and V1, V2, and V3 denote the same meaning maximum of two elements in R’ 46
  • 9. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 Now by Proposition 2.5.1 and Corollary 2.5.2 , R’3 = R’XR’XR’ is an Artex over W, where cap and cup operations are denoted by Ʌ and V respectively Let S = { (a,0,0) / aϵR’ } and Let T = { (0,b,0) / bϵR’ } Claim 1: S is a SubArtex space of R’3 Let m,nϵW, and mǂ0,nǂ0, and x, y ϵ S, where x = (a1,0,0) and y = (a2,0,0), a1, a2ϵR’ Now mx Ʌ ny = m(a1,0,0) Ʌ n(a2,0,0) = (ma1,m0,m0) Ʌ (na2,n0,n0) = (ma1,0,0) Ʌ (na2,0,0) = (ma1 Ʌ1na2,0 Ʌ20,0 Ʌ30) = ( ma1 Ʌ1na2, 0 ,0 ) Since m,nϵW, mǂ0,nǂ0, and a1, a2ϵR’, and R’ is an Artex space over W, ma1 Ʌ1na2 ϵ R’ Therefore, ( ma1 Ʌ1na2, 0 ,0 ) ϵ S That is, mx Ʌ ny ϵ S Now mx V ny = m(a1,0,0) V n(a2,0,0) = (ma1,m0,m0) V (na2,n0,n0) = (ma1,0,0) V (na2,0,0) = (ma1 V1na2,0 V20,0 V30) = ( ma1 V1na2, 0 ,0 ) Since m,nϵW, mǂ0,nǂ0, and a1, a2ϵR’, and R’ is an Artex space over W, ma1 V1na2 ϵ R’ Therefore, ( ma1 V1na2, 0 ,0 ) ϵ S That is, mx V ny ϵ S Therefore by Proposition 3.2.2, S is a SubArtex space of R’3. Hence Claim 1 Similarly T is a SubArtex space of R’3 Claim : S ᴜ T is not a SubArtex space of R’3 Let us take x= (2,0,0) and y = (0,3,0) Clearly xϵS and yϵT Therefore, x,y ϵ S ᴜ T But x V y = (2,0,0)V (0,3,0) = (2V10 , 0V23 , 0V30) 47
  • 10. Mathematical Theory and Modeling www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-5804 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0522 (Online) Vol.2, No.7, 2012 = (2,3,0) which does not belong to S ᴜ T Therefore, S ᴜ T is not a SubArtex space of R’3 Hence the union of two SubArtex spaces need not be a SubArtex space. References : 1. K.Muthukumaran and M.Kamaraj, ”Artex Spaces Over Bi-monoids”, Research Journal Of Pure Algebra,2(5),May 2012, Pages 135-140. 2. J.P.Tremblay and R.Manohar, Discrete Mathematical Structures with Applications to Computer Science, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited. 3. John T.Moore, The University of Florida /The University of Western Ontario, Elements of Abstract Algebra, The Macmillan Company, Collier-Macmillan Limited, London. 48
  • 11. This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTE’s homepage: http://www.iiste.org The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/ The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors. IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar