Sustainable Cities Index 2015 - Arcadis report

SUSTAINABLE
CITIES INDEX
2015
Balancing the economic,
social and environmental
needs of the world’s
leading cities

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
“Our world is changing at a faster
pace than ever before.”
John J Batten
Global Cities Director
ARCADIS

www.arcadis.com
1 Forewords
2 Executive Summary
3 The ARCADIS Sustainable Cities Index
3.1 What do we mean by sustainability?
3.2 Methodology
3.3 Overall index findings
3.4 People sub-index
3.5 Planet sub-index
3.6 Profit sub-index
4 Global urbanization challenges
5 Moving towards a more sustainable city
6 Appendix – detailed methodology and data sources
7 Further reading
Contents

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
1.
London

www.arcadis.com
Our world is changing at a faster pace than ever before.
Rapidly developing technology, population growth and the
emergence of a truly global economy mean that the notion of
national borders has become increasingly less relevant while the
concept of the ‘global city’ has swiftly taken hold. As our planet
continues to evolve, people will continue to flock to its busy,
dynamic and imposing urban centers. Urban migration is now
very much the norm. Love them or avoid them, we are now
entering the Age of the City.
A city is much more than just a place for people to live and
do business. Cities are areas of emotional attachment, each
with their own distinct personality, traditions and attraction
factor. On this note, I am continually reminded of the oft-
quoted advice of the anthropologist Margaret Mead,
“Always remember that you are
absolutely unique… just like everyone
else.”
It is precisely this uniqueness that makes the modern day
city such a fascinating and important subject for study.
The purpose of this report, our first Sustainable Cities Index, is
to take 50 of the world’s most prominent cities and look at how
viable they are as places to live, their environmental impact,
their financial stability, and how these elements complement
one another. All 50 of these brilliantly different cities – many
of which I have been fortunate enough to visit – are in various
stages of evolution – some being further along the sustainability
journey than others. Each possesses its own geolocation and
cultural distinctions but shares common urban challenges in
the areas of job creation, mobility, resiliency and improving the
quality of life of its residents.
In light of the global urbanization trend, cities are now
subject to frequent assessment with the results often used
by city leaders to inform decision-making and to sharpen
their competitive edge. There are numerous databases
(institutional and corporate) that are measuring cities in a
broad cross-section of livability and business climate indicators.
At ARCADIS we believe the best way to truly understand
the sustainability of a city is to amalgamate these attributes
from the perspectives of People, Planet and Profit to form a
comprehensive view of each location and its position on the
sustainability scale. Only then can we obtain a clearer picture of
how sustainable, or not, a city is.
Importantly, the purpose of the ARCADIS Sustainable Cities
Index is not to create a hierarchy of elite cities, but to indicate
areas of opportunity as they continue to make progress on
their missions to become more sustainable economically,
environmentally and for the good of their inhabitants. To quote
Margaret Mead again,
“We are continually faced with great
opportunities which are brilliantly
disguised as unsolvable problems.”
As our world becomes increasingly more reliant on its urban
centers, it is our hope that city leaders find this to be a valuable
tool in assessing their priorities and pathways to urban
sustainability for the good of all.
John J Batten
ARCADIS
ARCADIS View
The Age of the City

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Guest Foreword
We are living in the century of the
city,but are we living in the century
of the sustainable city?
The Sustainable Cities Index endeavors to
answer this seemingly simple but actually
quite complex question for 50 world cities
from 31 countries around the world.
Today, cities dominate in population numbers (54% of the
total), economic output (70-80%), energy consumption (80%)
and greenhouse gas production (80%). Notably, as this index
demonstrates, the more sustainable an urban area is, the
higher the quality of life, greater prosperity and lower per
capita greenhouse gas production it possesses. With more than
a quarter-of-a-million cities worldwide, understanding their
successes and failures in terms of sustainability through easily
accessible measures may seem to be an insurmountable task.
However, this index shows the way.
The Sustainable Cities Index not only benchmarks individual
places today but offers a roadmap for future improvements
outlining specific areas for attention. Most importantly, this
index offers a fundamental truth: cities have unique qualities
based on their histories, geographic contexts, and level of
development. In highlighting a city’s character – its strengths
and weaknesses – The Sustainable Cities Index provides a
platform for public and private decision-makers. Fundamentally,
however, it provides guidance and allows thoughtful decision-
makers to “Measure what can be measured and make
measurable what cannot be measured,” as per Galileo’s sage
advice.
This report is extraordinarily timely. Global leaders are currently
poised to take a closer look at the performance of cities
through two major initiatives. The first initiative will occur in
September 2015, when the United Nations General Assembly
replaces the expiring Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)
with a broad set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) that,
contrary to their predecessors, will apply to nations worldwide
not just to developing countries. Among the list recently
supported by the UN Secretary General is one that reads:
“Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient
and sustainable,” and is accompanied by seven targets. As
each nation is required to report annually on their progress
in implementing the SDGs, the Sustainable Cities Index will
certainly contribute to the reporting on the cities’ and human
settlements’ SDGs.
The second initiative is the Habitat III conference to be held in
2016. While this once-in-every-twenty years UN-wide meeting

www.arcadis.com
The Sustainable
Cities Index not only
benchmarks individual
places today but offers
a roadmap for future
improvements
involves the nations in deciding the contents of an anticipated
“new urban agenda” to guide future development policies
around the world, a wide variety of stakeholders will
contribute to the outcomes. Again, the Sustainable Cities
Index will be center stage as an important report to help
nations and cities plot their respective courses.
On behalf of the World Urban Campaign members, I offer
the appreciation and thanks of the partners for ARCADIS’
foresight and wisdom in crafting this report. It will provide a
strong basis for helping the world’s cities reach their highest
potential and ensure that this century will, indeed, be the
century of the sustainable city.
Dr. Eugenie L Birch
Nussdorf Professor of Urban Research
Co-Director, Penn Institute for Urban Research
University of Pennsylvania
Chair of Steering Committee, World Urban Campaign
UN-Habitat

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Executive Summary
• In a rapidly urbanizing world, the way in which cities are planned, built,
operated and redefined has a huge social, environmental and economic
impact
• City leaders need to find ways to balance the demands of generating strong
financial returns, being an attractive place for people to live and work in,
whilst also limiting their damage to the environment
• The first ARCADIS Sustainable Cities Index explores these three demands
of People, Planet and Profit to develop an indicative ranking of 50 of the
world’s leading cities
• Across the world, cities are performing better for being sustainable for
Profit and Planet purposes, but are failing to sufficiently meet the needs of
their People
• No utopian city exists, rather, city leaders face a difficult task balancing the
three pillars of sustainability
• Well established, European cities come top of the overall rankings, with
Frankfurt in first place, followed by London, Copenhagen, Amsterdam and
Rotterdam
• Asian cities show the most divergence, with Seoul, Hong Kong and
Singapore in the top ten and Manila, Mumbai, Wuhan and New Delhi
forming four of the bottom five cites
• No North American city makes it into the top ten. Toronto is the highest
ranked at 12th, Boston (15th) and Chicago (19th) are the most sustainable
US cities
2.

www.arcadis.com
• The trade-off between Planet and Profit is most starkly seen in the Middle
East where Dubai and Doha score much higher in Profit than Planet
sustainability where they rank in the bottom four
• In South America, Santiago (30th) and São Paulo (31st) are the two highest
ranking cities
• Rotterdam tops the People sub-index. Many of the world’s economic
powerhouses are becoming less affordable for their citizens, with the cost
of property in New York, London, Paris, Tokyo and Hong Kong penalizing
their rankings
• The German cities of Frankfurt and Berlin lead the way in the Planet sub-
ranking, scoring well for waste management and low levels of air pollution
in particular
• Frankfurt also leads the Profit ranking, along with London and Hong Kong.
US cities perform significantly better for Profit factors – San Francisco (6th)
is the highest ranked, and all the US cities appear in the top half of the
table
• Cities in the Middle East have seen the highest real term population growth
over the past five years, with Doha, Dubai and Abu Dhabi experiencing a
rise of over 30%
• City leaders in all 50 cities must plan for population increases over the
coming 15 years, but the pressure on some is immense. Whilst Tokyo’s
citizens are expected to increase by just 1% by 2030, Nairobi’s
population will grow by 121% and Shanghai will grow by 54% to over
30 million people

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
3.Sustainable Cities
Index
3.1. What do we mean by
sustainability?
Sustainability can encompass a wide variety of practices –
sustainable development has been defined by the United
Nations as: “Development that meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet
their own needs,” although there are other definitions. In an
urban context, this means cities that work well for their citizens
in the present without causing problems for themselves and
the rest of the world in the future.
Sustainable cities build transport systems that enable people
to navigate the city quickly and affordably, have clean and
safe water supplies, strong social structures and institutions
that work predictably and efficiently, a healthy and well-
educated workforce, and an environment conducive to strong
economic performance. To take the needs of the future into
account, cities must take care of their waste, avoid polluting
the atmosphere and protect the surrounding water from
contamination. Cities also need to guard against rare and
unpredictable events such as disasters that can cost lives
and set back their development. Sustainable development
means meeting current requirements without jeopardizing the
potential for future generations of inhabitants.
The broad definition of the concept means its measurement
should reflect a variety of different dimensions. This research
develops a composite index of sustainability, created from
combining many other input indices that each measure single
aspects of urban performance. The ARCADIS Sustainable Cities
Index takes into account data on these criteria from reputable
sources such as the United Nations, the World Bank, the World
Health Organization, the International Labor Organization and
many others.
3.2. Methodology
The research examines 50 cities from 31 countries ranking them
across a range of indicators to estimate the sustainability of each
city. The cities included within this report were selected to provide
an overview of the planet’s cities, providing not only wide-ranging
geographical coverage, but also a variety of levels of economic
development, expectations of future growth and an assortment of
sustainability challenges.
A detailed, evidence-based metric is derived to quantify each city’s
performance. The headline ranking can then be divided into three
broad subcategories: People, Planet and Profit. These correspond
to three dimensions of sustainability – social, environmental and
economic and can be described as the triple bottom line.
The 50 cities are ranked in each of the three sub-indices. The
breakdown shows us in which respects cities are doing well, and
in which respects they are falling behind and need to improve
their performance.

www.arcadis.com
The People sub-index rates transport
infrastructure, health, education,
income inequality, work-life balance, the
dependency ratio and green spaces within
cities. These indicators can be broadly
thought of as capturing ‘quality of life’ for
the populace in the respective cities.
The Planet sub-index looks at city energy
consumption and renewable energy share,
recycling rates, greenhouse gas emissions,
natural catastrophe risk, drinking water,
sanitation and air pollution.
The Profit sub-index examines
performance from a business perspective,
combining measures of transport
infrastructure (rail, air, other public
transport and commuting time), ease of
doing business, the city’s importance in
global economic networks, property and
living costs, GDP per capita and energy
efficiency.
A detailed, evidence-based metric is derived to quantify
each city’s performance. The headline ranking can then
be divided into three broad sub-categories
Profit
Assesses business
environment and economic
performance
People
Measures social performance
including quality
of life
Planet
Captures environmental
factors like energy emissions
and pollution

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Figure 1:
Frankfurt tops the overall sustainability index
Key
People Planet Profit
Source: Cebr analysis
1 Frankfurt
2 London
3 Copenhagen
4 Amsterdam
5 Rotterdam
6 Berlin
7 Seoul
8 Hong Kong
9 Madrid
10 Singapore
11 Sydney
12 Toronto
13 Brussels
14 Manchester
15 Boston
16 Paris
17 Melbourne
18 Birmingham
19 Chicago
20 New York
21 Houston
22 Philadelphia
23 Tokyo
24 Rome
25 Washington
26 Kuala Lumpur
27 San Francisco
28 Los Angeles
29 Dallas
30 Santiago
31 São Paulo
32 Mexico City
33 Dubai
34 Abu Dhabi
35 Shanghai
36 Istanbul
37 Johannesburg
38 Buenos Aires
39 Beijing
40 Rio de Janeiro
41 Doha
42 Moscow
43 Jeddah
44 Riyadh
45 Jakarta
46 Manila
47 Mumbai
48 Wuhan
49 New Delhi
50 Nairobi
Hong Kong

www.arcadis.com
3.3. Overall index findings
The top ten cities identified in the
ARCADIS Sustainable Cities Index
rankings as being more advanced in their
sustainability journey are dominated by
European cities.
Seven of the top ten performers are located in Europe, with
Frankfurt coming top overall and London coming a close
second. Frankfurt’s high ranking comes as a result of its leading
position in both the Planet and Profit sub-indicies, although a
slightly unfavorable population dependency ratio (measured
as the ratio of non-working age population to working age
population) and higher working hours holds Frankfurt back on
the People sub-index. London scores highly on both the People
and Profit measures, in part due to good health outcomes
and excellent higher education facilities, alongside being the
best-connected global city, with New York, in terms of its
importance to global business networks.
Three advanced Asian cities, Hong Kong,
Seoul and Singapore, make the top ten.
Seoul performs particularly well on the People sub-index,
where good health and the second highest transport
infrastructure across all 50 cities support a high ranking,
placing the city seventh on the overall ARCADIS Sustainable
Cities Index. In each of these cities, however, long working
hours relative to other cities impact on the work-life balance
measure – the average working hours in these three cities were
20% higher than those across all 50 cities.
At the other end of the scale fast-growing Asian cities are
most prevalent. The least sustainable cities include some of
the fastest growing cities on the Asian continent Jakarta
(45th), Manila (46th), Mumbai (47th), Wuhan (48th) and
New Delhi (49th).
These are joined by three Middle Eastern cities, Doha,
Jeddah and Riyadh at 41st, 43rd and 44th respectively,
as well as Moscow and Nairobi to form the bottom ten.
The prevalence of such rapidly growing cities amongst
the bottom ten highlights the ground that many of these
emerging cities still have to cover. Greater income may
help these cities to improve their rankings, however, as
highlighted by the positioning of some more advanced
cities, such as San Francisco and Los Angeles, higher
economic development does not guarantee greater
sustainability.
Furthermore, there are a number of cities where
sustainability appears to be particularly unbalanced across
the indices. Doha, for example scores much higher on the
Profit sub-index than on People and Planet. Meanwhile
the Brazilian cities of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo score
highly on the Planet sub-index, but are impacted by weak
People and Profit scores. In these cities, the areas of
potential improvement are clearer, but this also suggests
that sustainability could prove more sensitive to changing
economic circumstances or shifts in environmental policy.
To understand drivers of the composition of the overall
sustainability ranking better, each dimension – People, Planet
and Profit – is presented in the sections which follow.
The least sustainable cities include
some of the fastest growing cities on
the Asian continent Jakarta (45th),
Manila (46th), Mumbai (47th),
Wuhan (48th) and New Delhi (49th)

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Frankfurt
Germany
Frankfurt is widely recognized as a major international financial
and trade center as well as transportation hub. Frankfurt’s high
ranking in the Sustainable Cities Index may come as a surprise,
however, the self-proclaimed “Green City Frankfurt” has a
long track record of proactively taking action to improve its
sustainability. 25 years ago the city created its own energy agency
and is a founding member of the Climate Alliance of European
Cities in 1990, pledging to continuously reduce its CO2
emissions
by 10% every five years, resulting in a 50% cut by 2030. Since
1990 Frankfurt has already decreased its CO2
emissions per capita
by 15% while increasing its economic power by 50% and office
space by 80%.
Frankfurt’s new master plan “100% Climate Protection” goes even further. By 2050, 100%
of Frankfurt’s energy will originate from renewable (and mainly local) sources causing a 95%
decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. Frankfurt plans to achieve this by increasing energy
efficiency and decreasing the demand side by half in residential and office buildings, the
transportation sector, and in communications.
Frankfurt was one of three finalists to be awarded European Green Capital 2014. Furthermore,
the city has been recognized as the European City of Trees 2014 – not only is every tree
registered and monitored; the information is also publicly available online. Frankfurters can
also enjoy Germany’s largest city forest with more than 8,000 hectares or one third of the city.
The adjacent green belt that spans around the city from the Main river bank, is not only a close
recreational area but also the reason why Frankfurt is such a compact city of short distances. The
pleasant and compactness of the city explains why 15% of all commutes are already done by
bicycle.
1
People 9
Planet 1
Profit 1

www.arcadis.com
London
United Kingdom
Chicago
USA
London is a city with a great international
profile, widely regarded as one of the
top cities in the world as evidenced in the
Sustainable Cities Index, yet it is starting
to become a victim of its own success. For
years London has suffered from under-
investment in its infrastructure and is
struggling to meet the demands of the
existing population, let alone the impact
of growth.
Congestion and aging infrastructure are at the heart of current
issues, but so too are a chronic shortage of affordable housing,
air quality, and the more visible impact of climate change and
resilience against the elements.
The current Mayor of London has recognized this and
launched his 2020 Vision to make London ‘The Greatest City
on Earth’. The aim is to make London the best place in which
to work, live, play, study, invest and do business. World-class
infrastructure provision that meets the city’s needs is a critical
element of the vision. The Mayor’s vision identifies the shortage
of housing as the gravest crisis London currently faces.
Although housing delivery is increasing, it is still far short of the
49,000 net new homes that are needed every year to house
the growing population and meet the backlog of need. London
will also need to change its behaviors towards consumption,
whether in energy, waste, modes of transport. All this
requires political will, more devolved accountability to the city
authorities, and funding on a scale never before achieved.
Chicago is the second highest ranked US
city in the Sustainable Cities Index after
Boston. It is the third largest city in the US
and is a national transportation, industrial,
telecommunications, and financial leader
as well as a city of great architectural
significance, ethnic diversity, and cultural
wealth. The only inland urban area to
rank with major East and West Coast
cities, Chicago has achieved international
status through the quality of its cultural
institutions and its position as a world
financial center.
Chicago ranks number one in LEED certified buildings, has 26
miles of public lakefront and is home to multiple clean energy
companies. The City of Chicago is also leading the way in
implementing some innovative environmental initiatives, and
sustainability is a key focus of Chicago’s policies. ‘Sustainable
Chicago 2015’ is a plan to advance Chicago’s goal of becoming
the most sustainable city in the country; from improving
citywide energy efficiency and promoting diversified transit
options, to launching citywide recycling.
The plan aims to establish Chicago as a hub for the growing
sustainable economy and accelerate it by assisting people and
companies in adopting sustainable practices. More than $8
billion in public/private investments will be made over the next
decade.
2 19
People 3
Planet 12
Profit 2
People 18
Planet 29
Profit 12

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
The People sub-index, presented in Figure 2, measures the social performance of the city, that is, the interaction between a city and
its community. To investigate this, The Sustainable Cities Index uses nine separate indicators, all of which influence the quality of
life enjoyed within the city. The top 10 is dominated by European cities, with seven of the top ten coming from this continent. In
these cities, transportation infrastructure is typically quite good – the average commuting time amongst the top ten, for example, is
around ten per cent lower than amongst the 50 cities overall. London, Berlin and Manchester are slight exceptions here, however,
and have the lowest transport indicator scores amongst the top ten.
3.4. People
Rotterdam rises to the top
of the People sub-index,
supported by relatively strong
performance across most
indicators. The exception to
this is on higher education,
since the city has relatively
few high ranking universities
compared to other cities.
However, this is more than
compensated for by both
the affordability of property
within the city and the
work-life balance enjoyed by
citizens. Compared to other
countries within the top
ten, property is estimated to
be around 60% cheaper in
Rotterdam, while relatively
low hours worked support
a more favorable work-life
balance.
Only two Asian cities,
Hong Kong and Seoul,
make it into the top ten
on the People sub-index.
Accessible green spaces,
high quality education
and long life expectancies
all exert a strong positive
influence. However, as with
many of the Asian cities
included within our Index,
long working hours hold the
cities back from scoring even
higher.
The highest performing
US city is Boston, ranking
13th overall. The city does
particularly well on the two
education indicators, assisted
by the presence of first class
international educational
institutions. By contrast,
Boston was impacted by
a relatively low score for
transport infrastructure
– the provision of public
transport infrastructure in
particular ranked poorly
in comparison to many
other cities included within
the study. Similarly, in Los
Angeles, high commuting
times – the fifth highest of all
50 cities – contributed to a
low transport indicator score.
Meanwhile in New York,
while transport fared better,
the city was penalized for its
soaring property costs, which
were the highest recorded
across all the cities studied
and contributed to New York
ranking just 33rd.
Further down the rankings,
the relative prices of property
tend to support each city’s
scores. But this was usually
more than offset by poor
transport infrastructure,
education provisions
and health outcomes.
For these cities, such as
Nairobi, Rio de Janeiro
and Wuhan, investment is
needed in a wide array of
areas to improve the cities
sustainability from a social
perspective.
New York’s soaring
property costs
contributed to the
city ranking just
33rd.
Rotterdam
Netherlands
People 1
Planet 5
Profit 19
5
Rotterdam attaches great importance to sustainability, and
achieves a high ranking in the ARCADIS Sustainable Cities
Index.
Through the Rotterdam Sustainability Programme, the
Rotterdam Municipal Executive has set out its ambition
to make the city a clean, green and healthy city where
sustainability contributes to a strong economy. Reducing
carbon emissions by half, preparing for the consequences
of climate change, improving air quality and reducing
noise are the main topics of the programme, which the
Municipal Executive has committed to spending 31 million
euros on in order to achieve their green ambitions.
This programme is complemented by the Rotterdam
Climate Initiative (RCI). The RCI is a public-private
partnership consisting of the City of Rotterdam, the
Port of Rotterdam, the DCMR Environmental Protection
Agency Rijnmond, and Deltalinqs. Together these partners
aim to ensure that Rotterdam is the most sustainable port
city in the world. In order to achieve this, the ambition is
to realise a 50% reduction in CO2
by 2025 compared to
1990 and to be 100% climate proof.

www.arcadis.com
Kuala
Lumpur
Malaysia
People 23
Planet 24
Profit 22
26
Kuala Lumpur achieves a mid-table placing across
all of the Sustainable Cities Index rankings, but has
high ambitions. Within Malaysia’s current Economic
Transformation Program (ETP), improving Kuala Lumpur
and the wider Klang Valley around the capital, has
been identified as a key growth engine in delivering the
national vision and driving continued economic growth
across the country. The government has set a goal to
transform Kuala Lumpur into a world-class city by 2020
that appeals to both residents and tourists alike.
To help make Kuala Lumpur a cleaner, more efficient and
vibrant place to live and work, a number of important
initiatives are currently underway. Firstly, significant
investment is going in to improving mobility. The
expansion of the MRT system will help to ease congestion
and provide commuters to the city center with an
efficient and environmentally sustainable mode of public
transportation. Similarly, the high-speed rail link between
Kuala Lumpur and Singapore will offer a faster and more
reliable commute strengthening business links between
the two cities.
In an attempt to make Kuala Lumpur even more attractive
to people in the world, there is also a program in place to
increase green space and sustainability within the capital.
A target has been set to plant 100,000 trees within the
city by 2020 whilst steps are also underway to transform
Kuala Lumpur into a more pedestrian-friendly city with a
greater amount of safe and accessible walkways.
Transforming the Greater Kuala Lumpur / Klang Valley
region into a vibrant, world-class hub requires a
framework and comprehensive plan that has the support
of government, the private sector and citizens. Since the
ETP was launched in 2010, more than 40 government
agencies and private sector firms have been involved and
significant progress has been made in this period. By 2020
Kuala Lumpur will rightly stand amongst the world’s top
cities in terms of economic growth and livability whilst
retaining its diverse mix and cultural heritage.
Figure 2:
Rotterdam tops the People sub-index, demonstrating
strong social sustainability
Key
Transport infrastructure Dependency Ratio
Inequality Literacy Education Work-life balance
Health Green spaces Property Prices
1 Rotterdam
2 Seoul
3 London
4 Sydney
5 Copenhagen
6 Hong Kong
7 Amsterdam
8 Melbourne
9 Frankfurt
10 Berlin
11 Brussels
12 Manchester
13 Boston
14 Madrid
15 Toronto
16 Singapore
17 Birmingham
18 Chicago
19 Beijing
20 Paris
21 Tokyo
22 Shanghai
23 Kuala Lumpur
24 Philadelphia
25 Abu Dhabi
26 Dubai
27 Houston
28 San Francisco
29 Los Angeles
30 Dallas
31 Moscow
32 Rome
33 New York
34 Doha
35 Washington
36 Buenos Aires
37 Jeddah
38 Santiago
39 São Paulo
40 Istanbul
41 Johannesburg
42 Riyadh
43 Mexico City
44 Jakarta
45 Wuhan
46 Rio de Janeiro
47 Manila
48 Mumbai
49 New Delhi
50 Nairobi

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
The sub-index measuring environmental performance, which focuses on resource consumption, resource disposal and risk of
exposure to natural catastrophes, is the second component of the overall measure. The top ten features many European cities, with
only Singapore and Toronto coming from outside the continent. The two German entrants are at the top of the list.
3.5. Planet
Generally, the US cities fare
worse on this metric than
on the others. For example,
Chicago, Philadelphia and
especially Los Angeles are
all energy-hungry cities
which use a low proportion
of renewable energy. The
energy use and renewables
indicator measures
consumption per person and
the proportion of energy in
the country’s mix that comes
from sources other than
fossil fuels. Certain Latin
American cities do very well
on this indicator, with the
mix in Brazil estimated to be
37% renewable fuels.
Cities in the Middle East,
the United States and
some European countries
are let down by their
lack of renewable energy
solutions.
All the Middle Eastern
entrants use virtually
no renewable energy,
unsurprisingly given their
abundance of hydrocarbon
fuels, even if in recent years
moves towards renewables
have started to progress.
The UK, the Netherlands
and Russia lag European
leaders such as Denmark and
Spain in renewable energy
generation.
Natural catastrophe exposure
measures each city’s
vulnerability to eight kinds
of natural disaster. This is
determined by whether such
a disaster has occurred there
before (in records dating
back to 1900). San Francisco
and Los Angeles score the
lowest on this measure,
having experienced several
disasters. At the top are
various European and Middle
Eastern cities, including
London, Amsterdam,
Rotterdam, Abu Dhabi,
Dubai and Doha, which have
no record of experiencing
any of these disasters on a
sufficiently damaging scale.
Many cities score above
90% for air pollution,
which the World Health
Organization measures in
terms of particulate matter.
Losing out on this metric are
some Middle Eastern cities
(Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Doha)
and Nairobi, although for
the Middle East cities, the
prevalence of sandstorms
does play a part. New
Delhi comes last, with its
concentration of the particles
in question 60% higher than
the next-worst performer,
Doha.
The Chinese cities,
especially Wuhan,
are penalized due to
having larger, polluting
manufacturing industries.
Greenhouse gas emissions
are lowest in some
developing cities, including
Nairobi, Manila and São
Paulo, and highest in various
Middle Eastern and US
cities. A higher proportion of
journeys made by private car
drive this trend in the US.
Waste management
refers to the proportion of
waste disposed of in more
environmentally friendly
ways, such as through
composting and waste to
energy conversion. The
alternatives are landfill and
incineration. At the top are
Berlin and Frankfurt, which
have subsidies encouraging
waste-to-energy conversion,
and Brussels is close behind.
Some Latin American cities,
such as Santiago and São
Paulo, receive some of
the lowest scores on this
indicator due to recycling,
composting or converting
into energy very little of their
waste.
The final indicator, drinking
water and sanitation,
measures the percentage of
citizens with access to these,
however it does not take
into account areas of cities
with ‘informal settlements’.
Coverage is universal in
many cities thus their score
does not differ, but it does
penalize cities which have
slightly less than 100%
coverage including Wuhan
and Shanghai, also New
Delhi, Jakarta and Nairobi.

www.arcadis.com
New York
USA
People 33
Planet 20
Profit 13
20
New York City is the largest city in the United States and
is a global hub of international business and commerce.
The city has a comprehensive plan, PlaNYC, to help
improve the quality of life for generations to come.
The plan sets out targets to have the cleanest air in
the nation, fortify waterfronts and waterways, clean
contaminated land, and ensure all New Yorkers live
within a 10-minute walk of a park. Originally launched in
2007, the plan is overseen by the Mayor’s Office of Long-
Term Planning and Sustainability and the Mayor’s Office
of Recovery and Resiliency.
In 2014 a progress report on PlaNYC was published
which highlighted some major successes including:
• New York City air being the cleanest it’s been
for 50 years
• 865,000 trees and five million square feet of
reflective rooftops being added to urban landscape.
The latter is thanks to a Tax Abatement Program
which helps property owners offset the cost of
photovoltaic and green-roof installations
• Building codes being upgraded to prepare for floods,
wind, and extreme weather
• Over past 10 years carbon emissions being reduced
by 19% – well ahead of the goal to reach 30%
reduction by 2030
PlaNYC continues to drive sustainability improvements,
for example on the housing front, the New York City
Economic Development Corporation is facilitating the
creation of new transit-oriented neighborhoods with
affordable housing and community amenities on formerly
underutilized sites.
Figure 3:
Two German cities score highest on environmental stability,
with Europe performing strongly
Key
Energy use and renewables mix
Natural catastrophe exposure Air pollution
Greenhouse gas emissions Solid waste management
Drinking water and sanitation
1 Frankfurt
2 Berlin
3 Copenhagen
4 Madrid
5 Rotterdam
6 Amsterdam
7 Singapore
8 Rome
9 Toronto
10 Birmingham
11 Paris
12 London
13 Seoul
14 Manchester
15 Brussels
16 São Paulo
17 Rio de Janeiro
18 Sydney
19 Hong Kong
20 New York
21 Boston
22 Washington
23 Melbourne
24 Kuala Lumpur
25 Buenos Aires
26 Mexico City
27 Santiago
28 Tokyo
29 Chicago
30 Houston
31 Philadelphia
32 Istanbul
33 Shanghai
34 Manila
35 Johannesburg
36 Mumbai
37 San Francisco
38 Jakarta
39 Jeddah
39 Riyadh
41 Moscow
42 Dallas
43 Los Angeles
44 Abu Dhabi
45 Nairobi
46 Beijing
47 Dubai
48 Wuhan
49 New Delhi
50 Doha

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Jeddah
Saudi Arabia
São Paulo
Brazil
Jeddah is the second largest city in Saudi
Arabia and the largest city in the Makkah
Provence district where it is located. It is
also the commercial capital of Saudi Arabia
as well as its largest port.
Another key factor in Jeddah’s importance in Saudi Arabia is
as the gateway city to Islam’s two holiest sites in Makkah and
Madinah. Millions of pilgrims from all over the world converge
on the city throughout the year as a transit point on their
journey to the Kaaba in Makkah and the Prophet’s Mosque in
Madinah.
With one of the world’s fastest growing populations and the
increased number of pilgrims visiting each year, there has been
an increased strain on the city’s infrastructure. Jeddah has also
experienced severe flooding in the recent past which it must
ensure it is prepared for in the future.
Despite this rapid growth Jeddah has operated without
strategic or regional plans and without an updated master
plan. These documents are currently under commission by the
relevant authorities to fast-track Jeddah into the 21st century.
One of the key documents currently under commission is the
Jeddah Strategic Master Plan which has earmarked ten target
areas necessary for the city’s development including Urban
Territory & Land Use Planning, Transportation and Environment.
With its beautiful geographic location, historical legacy and
sensitive religious context within the Muslim world, the
prospects for Jeddah to become one of the region’s leading
cities are enormous.
São Paulo is the highest ranked Brazilian
city and second overall in Latin America. It
is the most populous city in Latin America
and is among the 10 most populous
cities in the world. Occupying an area of
1.5km², it is the largest city of the South
hemisphere, features a 7.6 million vehicle
(5.4 million cars) fleet, the second largest
helicopter fleet in the world (nearly 700)
and produces 20 thousand tons of waste
daily.
As many other large cities around the world, São Paulo faces
several challenges related to urban infrastructure, mainly
related to lack of planning and aging infrastructure, aligned
to rapid and uncontrolled population and urban growth.
In addition, truth is that the city has never had enough
investments to answer to its infrastructure demands.
Currently, the city relies on a city Strategic Master Plan which
provides a guide for goals, such as developing areas outside
the city center (bringing housing and jobs availability closer),
implementing popular housing programs and developing
transportation corridors.
Despite having its plan São Paulo is still missing some smart
solutions such as being able to attract private finance to enable
the regeneration of degraded areas, positioning São Paulo
as a target for international businesses through reducing the
“Custo Brasil” (cost of doing business in Brazil) and developing
a more qualified workforce, as well as seeking to adopt new
technologies to provide better efficiency in design, control and
assessment of urban infrastructure works and demands.
43 31
People 37
Planet 39
Profit 41
People 39
Planet 16
Profit 39

www.arcadis.com
São Paulo is the
second ranked
city overall in
Latin America

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Shanghai, mainland
China’s largest financial
center, ranks relatively
low, losing out on per-
capita GDP, energy
efficiency and the ease of
doing business.
São Paulo’s score is
harmed by relatively poor
transportation, low GDP
per head and Brazil’s
below-average score on
ease of doing business.
Inefficient use of energy,
which drives up the cost of
doing business, holds back
Singapore from an even
higher score.
Transport infrastructure is
calculated as a composite of
public transport, commuting
time, airport quality ranking
and the extent of the rail
network. While Los Angeles
currently faces challenges
with these ratings, significant
investment is underway to
improve congestion and
mobility. The United States’
first high-speed rail system
is under construction in
California, connecting Los
Angeles with other regions
and LA’s Metro Rail system
is also being doubled.
Elsewhere, some Middle
Eastern cities – Doha,
Jeddah, Riyadh – also
have metro systems that
are under construction
and underdeveloped bus
networks, meaning their
score is also low in this
respect.
Energy efficiency is measured
as the ratio of energy
consumption to GDP. This
tends to promote service-
based economies, which
allows cities from the US
and Europe to score highly.
Copenhagen is the most
efficient city in the world
at converting energy into
economic output.
Economic development
measures GDP per capita. At
US$93,300 per inhabitant,
Doha is the clear leader here,
followed by Washington and
Boston. Nairobi’s population
makes only US$1,100
on average. Rotterdam’s
US$34,500 is relatively low
in the global ranking, which
harms its overall score for the
Profit sub-index.
The World Bank ranks each
country’s regulatory regime
in terms of the ease of doing
business. This accounts for
factors such as the number
of steps involved in setting
up a company, the ease of
enforcing contracts and
the ease of trading across
borders. Singapore is the
world leader in the latest
Index, with Hong Kong,
Denmark and South Korea
other high performers.
India ranks the lowest of
our countries. Brazil and
Argentina also rank much
lower on this than on other
indicators.
The final indicator,
importance to global
networks, measures the
degree of connectivity
as determined by the
Globalization and World
Cities initiative. London and
New York are classed as
‘Alpha++’ cities, the highest
ranking. Wuhan loses out
somewhat, achieving the
lowest ranking here of
‘Sufficiency’. The Sustainable
Cities Index measures
economic connectedness,
“based upon the office
networks of 175 advanced
producer service firms in 526
cities.” It scores cities based
on how many of these firms’
offices they host, and the
importance of these offices
in the firms’ global networks.
The Profit sub-index aims to capture economic sustainability. On this measure three of the world’s largest financial centers lead:
Frankfurt comes first, followed by London and Hong Kong. Many well-known commercial and financial centers are impacted by
the high cost of doing business, as measured by the cost of living and of property – Tokyo, New York and San Francisco would each
receive higher scores if not for this.
3.6. Profit

www.arcadis.com
Figure 4:
Well-known financial centers come top, with some big
names held back by expensive office space
Key
Transport infrastructure Energy efficiency Economic
development Ease of doing business
Cost of doing business
Importance to global networks
1 Frankfurt
2 London
3 Hong Kong
4 Amsterdam
5 Melbourne
6 Seoul
7 San Francisco
8 Brussels
9 Singapore
10 Madrid
11 Copenhagen
12 Chicago
13 New York
14 Boston
15 Houston
16 Sydney
17 Los Angeles
18 Toronto
19 Rotterdam
20 Philadelphia
21 Manchester
22 Kuala Lumpur
23 Dallas
24 Tokyo
25 Washington
26 Berlin
27 Dubai
28 Paris
29 Birmingham
30 Doha
31 Mexico City
32 Johannesburg
33 Santiago
34 Abu Dhabi
35 Rome
36 Istanbul
37 Beijing
38 Shanghai
39 São Paulo
40 Manila
41 Jeddah
42 Buenos Aires
43 Jakarta
44 Riyadh
45 Moscow
46 Rio de Janeiro
47 Mumbai
48 New Delhi
49 Nairobi
50 Wuhan
Singapore

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Los Angeles
USA
LA is the second largest city in the US, a
center of a five-county metropolitan area
and is considered the prototype of the
future metropolis – a city on the cutting
edge of all of the advantages and the
problems of large urban areas. LA is a city
of fascinating diversity, incorporating one
of the largest Hispanic populations in the
United States, a major Asian community,
and sizable populations of nearly every
ethnic background in the world.
The people, institutions of knowledge, great climate and
infrastructure have enabled the LA region to emerge as a
leading business, trade and cultural center. LA is a hub of
international trade, tourism, is the largest manufacturing
center in the West, has one of the world’s busiest ports, is a
major financial and banking center, and is the largest retail
market in the US.
In 2013 the city appointed its first ever Chief Sustainability
Officer to lead the effort to create a greener city through
investments in transit, renewable energy, energy efficiency and
water efficiency.
Sustainability metrics have been defined and are measured
to achieve specific goals. For example, the Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power has an energy efficiency goal
to reach 15% by year 2020, the highest and most ambitious
energy efficiency goal by a major municipal utility in the US.
Despite its relatively low ranking in the Sustainable Cities Index,
Los Angeles leaders have begun investing heavily in measures
to ensure that it is able to lead the world in resolving them and
creating a long term, sustainable city.
28
People 29
Planet 43
Profit 17

www.arcadis.com
Singapore
Asia-Pacific
Whilst Singapore is placed in the top ten
in the Sustainable Cities Index, it ranks
lower than Hong Kong and Seoul through
achieving low scores for indicators like
work-life balance, having expensive
property prices, low use of renewable
energy and a high cost of doing business.
However, these areas do not deter from Singapore’s many
attributes. Only 50 years on from achieving full independence,
Singapore now stands as one of the world’s biggest financial
centers, a global transportation hub, and the location of choice
for many multinational organizations looking to set up their
regional headquarters in Asia. A large part of its success has
been built upon having a masterplan that links city planning
with business and social requirements.
To achieve its vision, a number of strategic initiatives are
currently underway which should see the city continue to
perform well, and address some of the areas highlighted by
the Sustainable Cities Index. For example, with the population
predicted to grow to more than six million people by 2030,
the government has committed significant investment over the
next decade to improving mobility and connectivity within the
city. This includes two new underground lines, extensions to
four existing MRT lines, a new terminal and runway at Changi
Airport, a high-speed rail link between Singapore and Malaysia
and the relocation of the container port.
Similarly, with almost 19% of the population expected to be
aged 65 or over by 2030, there’s also a major push to develop
new social infrastructure including community care homes,
specialist hospitals and nursing homes.
Another major focus area for the city is around green
urbanization and ensuring that sustainability is at the heart of
all future designs and masterplans.
Singapore has set an ambitious goal to make at least 80%
of all buildings ‘green’ by 2030 as part of a concerted
push to create a vibrant and high quality living environment,
that is resilient and which supports the broader climate
change agenda.
10
People 16
Planet 7
Profit 8

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
The challenges cities face are large and varied since sustainable
development requires a wide range of outcomes to be
achieved. Moreover, nearly all of the cities studies are growing
all the time – creating constantly evolving demands and
pressure. According to UN analysis, only two of the world’s
largest 71 cities will experience a decline in population
between 2010 and 2015. Indeed, some city populations are
growing at rates of 4%, 5%, or even 6% per year over the
same period, making it incredibly difficult for urban planners
and policymakers to keep up. Table 1 includes data from the
United Nations which illustrates the projected population
growth of the cities included within the Sustainable Cities Index
analysis.
The population expansion between 2010 and 2015
demonstrates the short-term stress that cities are facing as they
strive to achieve sustainable development. A notable feature
here is the difference between developed-world cities, which
are experiencing more moderate population growth, and
developing-world cities, which are experiencing rapid increases.
Large population growth combined with rapid rural-to-urban
migration has tended to accompany economic development
everywhere, and currently poses huge challenges for planners
in developing countries.
Looking at the longer-term, Table 1 also illustrates forecasts for
urban populations through to 2030. Six cities in the analysis
– Nairobi, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Kuala Lumpur, Beijing and Delhi
– will see growth of more than 60% over this time period. This
growth will place tremendous stress on transport networks,
water supply, waste collection systems, sewage systems and
land values, unless these cities work hard to keep up with the
influx of migrants. Tokyo is the world’s largest city today and
is projected to remain so in 2030, yet has the lowest rate of
growth of any city listed. In contrast emerging market cities
such as Jakarta and Mumbai are growing relatively slowly in the
short term from 2010 to 2015, but have among the highest
projected expansions between today and 2030.
Sustainability and development are intimately connected:
elements such as health, education and quality of life are
common to both. The consequence of faster growth in
developing cities is that many of the lower performers in the
Sustainable Cities Index are the ones that will come under
the most pressure. This is clearly visible in Table 1: the upper
half of the table is composed of high-growth, relatively
low-sustainability cities. The lower half of the table is where
low-growth, highly sustainable cities are concentrated. The
medium-growth cities are a mixed bunch, including an array of
cities that rank both low and high in sustainability terms.
The faster growing cities that are concentrated towards the
top of Table 1 face particular challenges: not only do they
have to make up the ground to reach higher positions in the
Sustainable Cities Index, they also have to work hard just
to stand still. Otherwise, with the same policies, regulations
and infrastructure, developing world cities could actually see
deterioration in sustainability as a consequence of added strain
on their environment.
The same applies to some developed world cities. London and
Toronto are already placed high in the sustainability rankings
but still need significant investment to maintain their position.
However, this is a relative indicator – even the top-ranked
sustainable cities could become significantly more sustainable.
Moreover, in the long-term there will be further population
growth that will stretch city infrastructure to the limit. For
example, Toronto’s population is set to grow by over a quarter,
and London’s by a fifth by 2030, which will create new
challenges for policymakers in those cities.
Global urbanization
challenges
4.

www.arcadis.com
Sustainable Cities
Index 2015 rank
City
Population, thousands Short term pressure Long term pressure
2010 2030 Expansion 2010–2015 % Expansion 2010–2030 %
41 Doha 529 837 36% 58%
33 Dubai 1,778 3,471 36% 95%
34 Abu Dhabi 879 1,608 30% 83%
39 Beijing 16,190 27,706 26% 71%
44 Riyadh 5,227 7,940 22% 52%
50 Nairobi 3,237 7,140 21% 121%
35 Shanghai 19,980 30,751 19% 54%
43 Jeddah 3,452 4,988 18% 44%
26 Kuala Lumpur 5,810 9,423 18% 62%
37 Johannesburg 7,992 11,573 18% 45%
49 New Delhi 21,935 36,060 17% 64%
21 Houston 4,976 6,729 13% 35%
36 Istanbul 12,703 16,694 11% 31%
29 Dallas 5,149 6,683 11% 30%
10 Singapore 5,079 6,578 11% 30%
12 Toronto 5,499 6,957 9% 27%
46 Manila 11,891 16,756 9% 41%
47 Mumbai 19,422 27,797 8% 43%
25 Washington 4,604 5,690 8% 24%
45 Jakarta 9,630 13,812 7% 43%
31 São Paulo 19,660 23,444 7% 19%
9 Madrid 5,787 6,707 7% 16%
38 Buenos Aires 14,246 16,956 7% 19%
17 Melbourne 3,951 5,071 6% 28%
3 Copenhagen 1,192 1,455 6% 22%
2 London 9,699 11,467 6% 18%
42 Moscow 11,461 12,200 6% 6%
48 Wuhan 7,515 9,442 5% 26%
1 Frankfurt 681 774 5% 14%
13 Brussels 1,958 2,203 4% 12%
32 Mexico City 20,132 23,865 4% 19%
40 Rio de Janeiro 12,374 14,174 4% 15%
14 Manchester 2,538 2,968 4% 17%
30 Santiago 6,269 7,122 4% 14%
8 Hong Kong 7,050 7,885 4% 12%
16 Paris 10,460 11,803 4% 13%
18 Birmingham 2,429 2,808 4% 16%
24 Rome 3,592 3,842 4% 7%
11 Sydney 4,364 5,301 3% 21%
4 Amsterdam 1,057 1,213 3% 15%
23 Tokyo 36,834 37,190 3% 1%
6 Berlin 3,475 3,658 3% 5%
22 Philadelphia 5,449 6,158 2% 13%
15 Boston 4,185 4,671 2% 12%
19 Chicago 8,616 9,493 1% 10%
20 New York 18,365 19,885 1% 8%
28 Los Angeles 12,160 13,257 1% 9%
27 San Francisco 3,283 3,615 1% 10%
7 Seoul 9,796 9,960 0% 2%
5 Rotterdam 996 1,077 0% 8%
Table 1:
Selection of the world’s
largest cities with growth
rates and ranking in the
Sustainable Cities Index
Source: United Nations,
Department of Economic
and Social Affairs, World
Urbanization Prospects:
The 2014 Revision
Green:
high ranking & lower
population growth
Red:
low ranking & higher
population growth

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Doha
Qatar
Doha is one of the up and coming global
cities that is expected to rise rapidly
through the rankings over the coming
years.
The Qatar National Vision 2030, produced by Qatar’s general
secretariat for development planning in 2008, outlines a
comprehensive framework for the country’s path to a brighter
future for its citizens, which rests on four pillars: environmental,
human, social and economic development. Coupled with the
rapid development associated with hosting the 2022 FIFA
World Cup, Qatar is experiencing huge expansion of its built
environment.
The 2030 Vision updates and expands this commitment
by embarking Qatar on a mission to cut its carbon dioxide
emissions, improve energy efficiency, minimize water use in
new, green buildings and invest in renewable energy solutions
and environmental science and technology.
The country has both the highest per capita income and per
capita carbon footprint on earth, which explains why it has
a long way go in its Planet ranking. Qatar has leveraged its
natural gas wealth for the benefit of its 300,000 citizens and
1.5 million expatriates whereby they enjoy free water and
electricity and pay little for these basic services. Furthermore,
petrol is inexpensive.
For many observers, however, this is a real problem. For
Qatar to become a sustainable society, citizens including
expatriates would have little incentive to mind water and fuel
consumption. This is compounded by the lack of planning
which has gone into the development of Doha and other
towns in the country, following its rapid rise in economic
development. Doha is currently under developed in regards to
urban environments for new visitors or expats – pavements and
crossings often lack development and provide little provision
for pedestrians and street life and for a country that relies on
desalination for water and where temperatures can reach 50°C
in the summer, the use of cars – rather than walking – has
become the norm.
Conscious of its own environmental position, Qatar has made
sustainable development a priority and is pushing ahead with
a growth plan to grow more of its own food while sharing its
knowledge and experience to help modern cities across the
world thrive in an eco-friendly way.
People 34
Planet 50
Profit 30
41

www.arcadis.com
Shanghai
China
Shanghai is already an enormous city and
faces a huge increase in population to
over 30 million people by 2030. In 2010
Shanghai hosted the World Expo to much
acclaim welcoming record numbers of
visitors to the city. Held under the banner
‘Better City, Better Life’, the forum saw
significant investment into the city’s
infrastructure to respond to this demand
and improve mobility within the city. The
success of the forum built real momentum
around Shanghai’s potential to become
this century’s “great world city”.
The on-going transformation of Shanghai is evident in a
number of areas today. Initiatives like the new Free Trade
Zone in Pudong reflect a wider push to position Shanghai as
a financial epicenter for Asia, on a par with other global cities
like London and New York.
One of the biggest challenges facing Shanghai, and many
other tier one cities in China, will be around improving the
quality of the living environment. Directives within the most
recent Five Year Plan have driven a renewed focus on cleaning
up old industrial zones within the city so that the land can be
repurposed for alternative use. Similarly, efforts are underway
to try and clean the three main rivers running through the city,
to improve water quality, and to future-proof the Northern
parts of the city against the risk of flooding.
Throughout the rest of this decade improvements in Shanghai’s
built and natural environments will play a key role in helping
to cement its place as the city of the 21st century. There is a
lot of work to do and success will be dependent on thorough
planning and management of this portfolio of work. However
the speed of progress the city has made over the last decade
demonstrates what it can achieve. Supported by a well-
educated workforce that is increasingly confident around the
city’s status, the future looks very bright for Shanghai.
35
People 22
Planet 33
Profit 38

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
5.Moving towards a
more sustainable city
A huge volume of work has been done to research, analyze,
discuss and bring together collective knowledge to answer
the most pressing of questions: How do we create more
sustainable cities?
ARCADIS is involved in many of these forums including the
World Urban Campaign, the World Business Council for
Sustainable Development (WBCSD), the C40 Connecting
Delta Cities Network and Eurbanlab. All of these initiatives,
in addition to the many others, offer valuable insight into the
ways in which cities can thrive.
One of the most important focal points in the debate will
be the Third United Nations Conference on Housing and
Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III) which will be held
in Quito, Ecuador in October 2016. The Habitat III conference
will address sustainable urbanization and the future of urban
spaces. It will also serve as an opportunity to assess the state of
our cities, to develop solutions, and to revisit our shared urban
future.
As UN-Habitat states, “While cities are at the heart of today’s
global crisis, they are also the source of solutions for a
sustainable future.”
Balancing priorities
Taking the framework for a sustainable city being to find a
balance between People, Planet and Profit, we can see from
the research in this report that no city has been able to achieve
top ratings for all criteria. This is understandable in that each
city is unique, so there is, rightly, no one-size-fits-all solution.
Instead, we can see that a city needs to have a clear vision
for what it wants to be and set a roadmap for how it can get
there. To do this cities need to take a balanced view of their
sustainability vision. This needs to take into account a range
of principles to provide a solution that balances the city’s
requirements.
This will support cities in their master planning, strategy
development and CSR strategy in relation to sustainability.
While cities are at the heart of today’s
global crisis, they are also the source of
solutions for a sustainable future.

www.arcadis.com
W
ATER
WASTE
ENERGY & CLIMATE ACTIONHEALTH & WELL-BEING
TRANSPORT & ACCESSIBILTY
M
ATE
RIALS
&
RESOURCES
BIODIVERSTIY
LOCALECONOM
Y
BUILDINGS
COMMUNITY&CULTURE
Figure 5:
Sustainability Target Assessment Rating Framework
Source: ARCADIS

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Who are your urban peers?
A key question here is who to benchmark against. Whilst the
Sustainable Cities Index provides a strong global view, there
is a clear grouping within the ratings that can help cities to
benchmark against their appropriate peers.
For example, cities in the Middle East – Doha, Dubai, Abu
Dhabi, Jeddah and Riyadh – all face similar challenges when
it comes to issues such as water scarcity, transportation
infrastructure and wanting to develop rapidly to take their
places on the global map.
In Asia, Singapore and Hong Kong have a long standing rivalry
due to their statures as thriving economic centers. The elder
statesmen cities in Europe including Amsterdam, Copenhagen
and Berlin achieve similar high rankings across The Sustainable
Cities Index, and the US cities can easily be compared with one
another, although the sheer diversity of the US does mean they
each have particular challenges of their own.
Likewise, cities can be compared globally and by the issues they
face. For example, the cities built on a river delta face similar
pressures no matter what continent they are in, and population
growth, as we have seen, is an issue for all.
From assessment of priorities and clustering, cities are able to
focus on their most pressing needs and learn from others to
ensure they achieve a sustainable outcome for themselves.
For example, cities at risk of flooding as a result of climate
change or due to their geographical location, can learn from
the strategies undertaken in places like Rotterdam, where
severe floods in the middle of the 20th Century were the
catalyst for actions to be taken that have kept the city safe up
until the present day.
In a similar way, with limited finance available, city developers
can learn how others have attracted private sector money
through innovative finance packages, or have fought issues
such as poor air quality, regenerated contaminated land or
improved their transportation infrastructure.

www.arcadis.com
New York
Boston
San Francisco
Toronto
Washington
Copenhagen
Jakarta
Melbourne
Rio de Janeiro
Rotterdam
Hong Kong
London
Shanghai
Singapore
Tokyo
Frankfurt
Chicago
Dallas
Houston
Los Angeles
Region
North America
Ambition
Global ﬁnancial center
Issue
Delta Cities
Figure 6:
Sample city clusters by issue, region or ambition
Source: ARCADIS

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
Concluding thoughts: Delving deeper into
the Sustainable Cities Index
The pattern of learning from others makes the ARCADIS
Sustainable Cities Index a very interesting tool that can be used
to gauge how cities are seeking to strike the balance between
People, Planet and Profit and the interdependencies between
them. For example, the Planet indicators show that cities that
perform well economically often do so at a high environmental
cost. The breakdown into sub-indices demonstrates where
cities need to make investment to improve their overall
performance. Cities like New York, Hong Kong, London and
Singapore are victims of their own success in some ways
with very high land costs. For long term economic and social
sustainability, this requires a heavy program of investment in
housing and office space.
Similarly, the findings demonstrate that European cities
need to refocus their attention on the business environment
and achieving stronger economic performance. On various
components of the Profit sub-index the European cities
perform weakly as the Eurozone financial and sovereign debt
crisis continues to drag on. The findings highlight the major
competitiveness challenges faced by the continent.
On the other hand, many US cities would perform much better
in the Sustainable Cities Index if it were not for their energy use
characteristics, with heavy reliance on cars and lower ranking
waste management practices. The Middle Eastern entrants, bar
Jeddah, share in common this outperformance on the Profit
sub-index relative to the Planet rankings.
One of the most compelling findings is the urgency with
which developing cities need to act to address sustainability
challenges. The Sustainable Cities Index points to the need
for rapid improvement across the board among fast-growing
cities in the emerging markets of Asia and South America, as
they will see the fastest population growth over the coming
decades. Those cities that achieve the lowest ranking on the
Sustainable Cities Index are generally also the fastest growing,
which brings into focus the real challenges that lie ahead to
deliver improved social, environmental and economic outcomes
for huge swathes of the world’s population.
It is through taking insights such as this and seeking global
expertise and best practice that city leaders will be able
to achieve their ambitions and create cities with a stable,
sustainable future.
ARCADIS is already working with many of the cities featured in
this report to help them to meet their challenges and become
more sustainable. Through this report, we look forward
to opening up further opportunities to bring our global
experience to more cities and help them to achieve their goals.
Please look out for next year’s ARCADIS Sustainable Cities
Index to see how these cities have moved on over the year.
One of the most compelling
findings is the urgency with
which developing cities
need to act to address
sustainability challenges.

www.arcadis.com
New York

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
6.
Methodology
In total, 20 input indicators were taken into account to compile
the Sustainable Cities Index, comprising nine for the People
sub-index; six for the Planet sub-index and six for the Profit
sub-index (property prices appearing twice). The data behind
these indicators was processed so that higher scores represent
more sustainable cities, and give the highest-ranked city in
each indicator a score of 100%, while the lowest-ranked
city receives 0%, so that each city’s performance within each
category is measured relative to each of the other 49 cities. By
averaging the indicators, a score for every city in each of the
three sub-indices is derived and combined to deliver an overall
score. Some indicators, such as transport infrastructure, are
deemed to have importance to multiple sub-indices, where
this is the case these indicators are suitably discounted before
entering the overall score to avoid double counting. The output
is a percentage score: theoretically a city could attain 100% if
it came top in every category, but in reality no city does – the
highest score, that of Frankfurt, is 70%.
Where one indicator appears in more than one sub-index (for
example, transport appears in both People and Profit indices), it
enters the overall Sustainable Cities Index only once. Otherwise
the overall Sustainable Cities Index score is comprised of one
third of the scores on each of the sub-indices. Table 2 provides
an overview of each of the indicators that enter the Sustainable
Cities Index.
Disclaimer
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of
the material in this document, neither Centre for Economics
and Business Research Ltd nor ARCADIS will be liable for any
loss or damages incurred through the use of the report.
Authorship and acknowledgements
This report has been produced by the Centre for Economics
and Business Research, an independent economics and
business research consultancy, and experts from across
ARCADIS. The views expressed herein are those of the authors
only and are based upon independent research by them. For
more information about the Centre for Economics and Business
Research, visit www.cebr.com
About ARCADIS
ARCADIS is the leading global natural and built asset design
& consultancy firm working in partnership with our clients
to deliver exceptional and sustainable outcomes through the
application of design, consultancy, engineering, project and
management services. ARCADIS differentiates through its
talented and passionate people and its unique combination of
capabilities covering the whole asset life cycle, its deep market
sector insights and its ability to integrate health & safety and
sustainability into the design and delivery of solutions across
the globe. We are 28,000 people that generate €3 billion
in revenues. We support UN-Habitat with knowledge and
expertise to improve the quality of life in rapidly growing cities
around the world. www.arcadis.com
Appendix: methodology
and data sources

www.arcadis.com
Table 2:
Sustainable cities indicators
Indicator People Planet Profit Source Description
Literacy •
World Bank World Development
Indicators
Adult total literacy rate (% of over
15s who can read and write)
Education • QS World University rankings
University scores based on six
categories
Green spaces •
Siemens Green City Index,
municipality websites, others
Percentage of green space within
city area (parks or undeveloped
nature)
Health •
Indicators
Life expectancy at birth
Dependency ratio •
Indicators
Ratio of economically active
population to economically inactive
population
Income inequality •
Indicators
Gini coefficient (0=perfect equality,
1=all income goes to one person)
Work-life balance •
International Labor Organization,
UBS and OECD
Average hours worked per
employee per year
Property prices •
UBS prices and earnings and
Numbeo
Purchase price for residential
property, $US per sq meter
Transport
infrastructure
(composed of--)
Public transport
• •
Siemens Green City Index, others
Density of public transport network,
km/km2
Commuting time
TomTom traffic index, Numbeo
commuting times
One-way commute time
Rail infrastructure World Metro Database
Kilometers of metro/light rail
network per capita
Airport satisfaction Skytrax World Airport Awards
Survey of customer satisfaction in
airports
Energy use and
renewables mix
(composed of--)
Energy consumption
•
Energy Information Administration
Primary energy consumption per
capita
Renewable consumption Energy Information Administration
Share of renewable energy in
energy mix (country-level)
Natural catastrophe
exposure •
EM-DAT: International Disaster
Database
Number of categories of natural
catastrophe (out of a possible 8)
that a city has been affected by
Air pollution •
World Health Organization Ambient
Air Pollution Database
Annual mean concentration of fine
particulate matter
Greenhouse gas
emissions • Carbon Disclosure Project Total CO2
emissions
Solid waste
management • World Bank
Rates of landfill/recycling/compost/
waste-to-energy of solid waste
Drinking water
and Sanitation
(composed of…)
Drinking water
•
WHO/Unicef Joint Monitoring
Program for Water Supply and
Sanitation
Urban improved (e.g. piped)
drinking water (as opposed to
unimproved, e.g. surface)
Sanitation
Urban improved sanitation facilities
(as opposed to unimproved)
Energy efficiency • Energy Information Administration
Total energy consumption per dollar
of GDP
Importance to
global networks •
Globalization and World Cities
(GaWC) Research Network
Measures how integrated a city is
into the world’s network of cities
GDP per capita • Brookings institute Gross domestic product per capita
Ease of doing
business •
World Bank Ease of Doing Business
Index
Composite indicator of EoDB
including regulations, corruption,
etc
Cost of doing
business
Goods and services costs
•
UBS Prices and Earnings
Comparison of goods and services
costs across cities
Property prices
UBS prices and earnings and
Numbeo
Purchase price for residential
property, $US per sq meter

Sustainable
Cities Index 2015
7.Further reading
Built Asset Performance
Index
Global Infrastructure
Investment Index
International Construction
Costs
Construction Disputes report Global Office Refurbishment

Find out more
cities@arcadis.com
www.arcadis.com
www.arcadis.com/sustainablecities
Please contact
John J Batten
ARCADIS
email: john.batten@arcadis.com
twitter: @jbattenbuc
Colin Edwards
Senior Economist
Centre for Economics and Business Research
email: cedwards@cebr.com
Follow us
@ARCADISglobal
Join us
LinkedIn ARCADIS

Sustainable Cities Index 2015 - Arcadis report

More Related Content

What's hot (17)

Similar to Sustainable Cities Index 2015 - Arcadis report (20)

More from Graciela Mariani (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Sustainable Cities Index 2015 - Arcadis report