SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Techniques for High Accuracy Relative and Absolute Localization of TerraSAR-X / TanDEM-X Data   U. Balss , M. Eineder, T. Fritz, H. Breit, and C. Minet German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF)
Outline Introduction Measurement Method Consideration of Continental Drift Particulars of Bistatic Acquisition Geometry Measurement Results of Absolute Localization Accuracy (TerraSAR-X) Relative Localization Accuracy (TanDEM-X) Conclusions
Introduction TSX-1 (launched June 2007) and TDX-1 (launched June 2010) constitute first bistatic SAR system in space. One satellite transmits radar pulses. Both satellites receive the echoes. High geometric accuracy requires consideration of signal propagation effects geodynamic effects in geolocation of ground targets. passive channel: Geolocation is additionally complicated by  bistatic acquisition geometry
Measurement Method 6 Corner Reflectors (CR) at  Oberpfaffenhofen  Test Site Comparison of measured radar positions their expected values Expected values are based on precise GPS measurements of CR positions orbit interpolation of satellites’ positions The following effects have to be taken into account: additional signal delays (caused by electrons in ionosphere and water vapor in atmosphere) solid earth tides continental drift
Continental Drift and Geodetic Coordinate System s * TSX-1 / TDX-1 orbit in ITRS-2005/08 coordinates * GPS position of CR in tectonic plate fixed system (e.g. ETRS89) misinterpretation of GPS coordinates offset between expected and true CR position (e.g. approx. 60 cm if ETRS89 is taken for ITRF-2005)
Effect of Continental Drift on Radar Coordinates (e.g. corner reflector CR moved to northeast) ascending orbit (right looking): CR occurs more in late azimuth and far range than expected t 1 t 2 >t 1 expected position of CR true position of CR flight path continental drift azimuth range W S N E height
Effect of Continental Drift on Radar Coordinates (e.g. corner reflector CR moved to northeast) descending orbit (right looking): CR occurs more in early azimuth and near range than expected t 2 <t 1 t 1 expected position of CR true position of CR flight path continental drift azimuth range W S N E height
Effect of a Coordinate System Mismatch Wrong:  ETRS89 coordinates are misinterpreted as ITRS-2005 Correct:  ETRS89 coordinates are transformed to ITRS-2005 system
Bistatic Acquisition Geometry of TanDEM-X (Passive Imaging Channel) bistatic range depends on signal travel time which again depends on bistatic range
Computation of Bistatic Closest Approach iteration step ( n =0, 1, 2, …) initialization 2)  Coordinate of hyperbola apex results by nested intervals . 1) Recursive computation of bistatic range for given slow time  t :
Bistatic Acquisition Geometry of TanDEM-X (Active Imaging Channel) Satellite moves during signal travel time. Satellite position differs between instants of pulse transmission and echo reception. Thus, even this acquisition geometry is strictly speaking  bistatic. Results of monostatic and bistatic computation scheme differ by some tenth of a millimeter.
Absolute Pixel Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 (Based on TSX-1 Calibration Datatakes 2007/09) L1B products created before 2011-07-15: bandwidth dependent range offset: 100 MHz : -33 cm 150 MHz : -14 cm 300 MHz : +12 cm azimuth offset:   +8 cm Meanwhile bandwidth dependency is solved by code change in SAR processor and instrument is recalibrated.
Absolute Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 (Reprocessed by Actual SAR Processor Version) σ azimuth   = 6.3 cm σ range   = 3.8 cm The following offsets are subtracted: azimuth offset:  +8 cm range offset  : -29 cm
Absolute Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 and TDX-1 (Based on Calibration Datatakes 2010) TDX-1 σ azimuth   = 5.5 cm σ range   = 3.5 cm TSX-1 σ azimuth   = 5.3 cm σ range   = 3.5 cm
Relative Localization Accuracy of Bistatic TanDEM-X Acquisitions different scaling of axes azimuth: -100 … +60 mm range  :  -10 …  +6 mm ! mean value: m azimuth  = -18  mm m range   =  -2.1 mm standard deviation: over all acquisitions: σ azimuth  = 40  mm σ range   =  4.4 mm within an acquisition: σ azimuth  = 16  mm σ range   =  1.0 mm
Conclusions Geolocation of ground targets has to accurately consider  signal propagation  and  geodynamic effects. Taking these effects into account, we reveal a much better absolute pixel localization accuracy of TSX-1 / TDX-1, than previous studies. The increased measurement accuracy also helped us to identify and solve a small systematic effect in SAR processing. TerraSAR-X:   Absolute pixel localization accuracy  in the order of magnitude of just  few centimeters. TanDEM-X:   Relative pixel localization accuracy  in range direction even at  sub-centimeter level.
Thank you for your attention!

More Related Content

PPT
FR1.L09.3 - SAR TOMOGRAPHIC FOCUSING BY COMPRESSIVE SAMPLING: EXPERIMENTS ON ...
PDF
Dinh_BIOMASS_TomoSAR
PPT
YellowIGARSS.ppt
PPT
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
PPT
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
PPT
What Is GPS
PPTX
Seismic data processing 14, stacking&amp;migration2
PDF
Urban areas
FR1.L09.3 - SAR TOMOGRAPHIC FOCUSING BY COMPRESSIVE SAMPLING: EXPERIMENTS ON ...
Dinh_BIOMASS_TomoSAR
YellowIGARSS.ppt
MO4.L09 - POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF FORWARD-LOOKING BISTATIC SAR
zhu_et_al_IGARSS2011_time_warp.ppt
What Is GPS
Seismic data processing 14, stacking&amp;migration2
Urban areas

What's hot (17)

PPT
M Sc Poster_Jackson_Hydro_13
PPTX
Presentation on the background theory of InSAR
PPTX
Earth Science G10 Module 1 Activity 1
PDF
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
PDF
4-1 foret
PPTX
Science 10 First Quarter Module 1 Activity no 1. Find the Center
PPTX
Trilateration and Keplerian elements
PPTX
Find the center
PDF
A SWITCHED-ANTENNA NADIR-LOOKING INTERFEROMETRIC SAR ALTIMETER FOR TERRAIN-AI...
PPTX
F-K Filtering for Seismic Data Processing
PPT
4_Presentation.DE+EnVA.20110727.ppt
PDF
PPT
IGARSS_2011_LLIAO.ppt
PDF
TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X
PPTX
Atmospheric correction albufera_web
PPTX
The Dvorak Technique
PPTX
Scale factor gis
M Sc Poster_Jackson_Hydro_13
Presentation on the background theory of InSAR
Earth Science G10 Module 1 Activity 1
Principles of seismic data processing m.m.badawy
4-1 foret
Science 10 First Quarter Module 1 Activity no 1. Find the Center
Trilateration and Keplerian elements
Find the center
A SWITCHED-ANTENNA NADIR-LOOKING INTERFEROMETRIC SAR ALTIMETER FOR TERRAIN-AI...
F-K Filtering for Seismic Data Processing
4_Presentation.DE+EnVA.20110727.ppt
IGARSS_2011_LLIAO.ppt
TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X
Atmospheric correction albufera_web
The Dvorak Technique
Scale factor gis
Ad

Similar to TechniquesForHighAccuracyRelativeAndAbsoluteLocalizationOfTerraSARXTanDEMXData.ppt (20)

PPT
RADAR MEASUREMENTS LECTURE EECS BERKELY!
PPT
Rocca.ppt
PDF
In tech recent-advances_in_synthetic_aperture_radar_enhancement_and_informati...
PDF
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
PPT
TH1.L09 - INVESTIGATIONS ON TOPS INTERFEROMETRY WITH TERRASAR-X
PPTX
VALIDATING SATELLITE LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE PRODUCTS FOR GOES-R AND JPSS MI...
PPS
PresentationSAR
PPT
2_prats_IGARSS2011_distributed_imaging_v4.ppt
PPT
PPT
SAR (InSAR) INTERFEROMETRY+ remote sensing
PPTX
Microwave remote sensing
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PDF
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
PPT
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
RADAR MEASUREMENTS LECTURE EECS BERKELY!
Rocca.ppt
In tech recent-advances_in_synthetic_aperture_radar_enhancement_and_informati...
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
TH1.L09 - INVESTIGATIONS ON TOPS INTERFEROMETRY WITH TERRASAR-X
VALIDATING SATELLITE LAND SURFACE TEMPERATURE PRODUCTS FOR GOES-R AND JPSS MI...
PresentationSAR
2_prats_IGARSS2011_distributed_imaging_v4.ppt
SAR (InSAR) INTERFEROMETRY+ remote sensing
Microwave remote sensing
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
DUAL BAND GNSS ANTENNA PHASE CENTER CHARACTERIZATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS
TH1.L10.3: MONOSTATIC CALIBRATION OF BOTH TANDEM-X SATELLITES
Ad

More from grssieee (20)

PDF
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
PDF
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
PPTX
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
PPT
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
PPTX
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
PPTX
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
PPT
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
PPT
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
PPT
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
PPT
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
PDF
Test
PPT
test 34mb wo animations
PPT
Test 70MB
PPT
Test 70MB
PDF
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
PPT
DLR open house
PPT
DLR open house
PPT
DLR open house
PPT
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
PPT
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt
Tangent height accuracy of Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission S...
SEGMENTATION OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA WITH A MULTI-TEXTURE PRODUCT MODEL
TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMETRIC SAR DATA TWO-POINT STATISTIC OF POLARIMET...
THE SENTINEL-1 MISSION AND ITS APPLICATION CAPABILITIES
GMES SPACE COMPONENT:PROGRAMMATIC STATUS
PROGRESSES OF DEVELOPMENT OF CFOSAT SCATTEROMETER
DEVELOPMENT OF ALGORITHMS AND PRODUCTS FOR SUPPORTING THE ITALIAN HYPERSPECTR...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
EO-1/HYPERION: NEARING TWELVE YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MISSION SCIENCE OPERATION A...
Test
test 34mb wo animations
Test 70MB
Test 70MB
2011_Fox_Tax_Worksheets.pdf
DLR open house
DLR open house
DLR open house
Tana_IGARSS2011.ppt
Solaro_IGARSS_2011.ppt

TechniquesForHighAccuracyRelativeAndAbsoluteLocalizationOfTerraSARXTanDEMXData.ppt

  • 1. Techniques for High Accuracy Relative and Absolute Localization of TerraSAR-X / TanDEM-X Data U. Balss , M. Eineder, T. Fritz, H. Breit, and C. Minet German Aerospace Center (DLR), Remote Sensing Technology Institute (IMF)
  • 2. Outline Introduction Measurement Method Consideration of Continental Drift Particulars of Bistatic Acquisition Geometry Measurement Results of Absolute Localization Accuracy (TerraSAR-X) Relative Localization Accuracy (TanDEM-X) Conclusions
  • 3. Introduction TSX-1 (launched June 2007) and TDX-1 (launched June 2010) constitute first bistatic SAR system in space. One satellite transmits radar pulses. Both satellites receive the echoes. High geometric accuracy requires consideration of signal propagation effects geodynamic effects in geolocation of ground targets. passive channel: Geolocation is additionally complicated by bistatic acquisition geometry
  • 4. Measurement Method 6 Corner Reflectors (CR) at Oberpfaffenhofen Test Site Comparison of measured radar positions their expected values Expected values are based on precise GPS measurements of CR positions orbit interpolation of satellites’ positions The following effects have to be taken into account: additional signal delays (caused by electrons in ionosphere and water vapor in atmosphere) solid earth tides continental drift
  • 5. Continental Drift and Geodetic Coordinate System s * TSX-1 / TDX-1 orbit in ITRS-2005/08 coordinates * GPS position of CR in tectonic plate fixed system (e.g. ETRS89) misinterpretation of GPS coordinates offset between expected and true CR position (e.g. approx. 60 cm if ETRS89 is taken for ITRF-2005)
  • 6. Effect of Continental Drift on Radar Coordinates (e.g. corner reflector CR moved to northeast) ascending orbit (right looking): CR occurs more in late azimuth and far range than expected t 1 t 2 >t 1 expected position of CR true position of CR flight path continental drift azimuth range W S N E height
  • 7. Effect of Continental Drift on Radar Coordinates (e.g. corner reflector CR moved to northeast) descending orbit (right looking): CR occurs more in early azimuth and near range than expected t 2 <t 1 t 1 expected position of CR true position of CR flight path continental drift azimuth range W S N E height
  • 8. Effect of a Coordinate System Mismatch Wrong: ETRS89 coordinates are misinterpreted as ITRS-2005 Correct: ETRS89 coordinates are transformed to ITRS-2005 system
  • 9. Bistatic Acquisition Geometry of TanDEM-X (Passive Imaging Channel) bistatic range depends on signal travel time which again depends on bistatic range
  • 10. Computation of Bistatic Closest Approach iteration step ( n =0, 1, 2, …) initialization 2) Coordinate of hyperbola apex results by nested intervals . 1) Recursive computation of bistatic range for given slow time t :
  • 11. Bistatic Acquisition Geometry of TanDEM-X (Active Imaging Channel) Satellite moves during signal travel time. Satellite position differs between instants of pulse transmission and echo reception. Thus, even this acquisition geometry is strictly speaking bistatic. Results of monostatic and bistatic computation scheme differ by some tenth of a millimeter.
  • 12. Absolute Pixel Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 (Based on TSX-1 Calibration Datatakes 2007/09) L1B products created before 2011-07-15: bandwidth dependent range offset: 100 MHz : -33 cm 150 MHz : -14 cm 300 MHz : +12 cm azimuth offset: +8 cm Meanwhile bandwidth dependency is solved by code change in SAR processor and instrument is recalibrated.
  • 13. Absolute Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 (Reprocessed by Actual SAR Processor Version) σ azimuth = 6.3 cm σ range = 3.8 cm The following offsets are subtracted: azimuth offset: +8 cm range offset : -29 cm
  • 14. Absolute Localization Accuracy of TSX-1 and TDX-1 (Based on Calibration Datatakes 2010) TDX-1 σ azimuth = 5.5 cm σ range = 3.5 cm TSX-1 σ azimuth = 5.3 cm σ range = 3.5 cm
  • 15. Relative Localization Accuracy of Bistatic TanDEM-X Acquisitions different scaling of axes azimuth: -100 … +60 mm range : -10 … +6 mm ! mean value: m azimuth = -18 mm m range = -2.1 mm standard deviation: over all acquisitions: σ azimuth = 40 mm σ range = 4.4 mm within an acquisition: σ azimuth = 16 mm σ range = 1.0 mm
  • 16. Conclusions Geolocation of ground targets has to accurately consider signal propagation and geodynamic effects. Taking these effects into account, we reveal a much better absolute pixel localization accuracy of TSX-1 / TDX-1, than previous studies. The increased measurement accuracy also helped us to identify and solve a small systematic effect in SAR processing. TerraSAR-X: Absolute pixel localization accuracy in the order of magnitude of just few centimeters. TanDEM-X: Relative pixel localization accuracy in range direction even at sub-centimeter level.
  • 17. Thank you for your attention!