The place of utopia
in today’s science
Filipa M. Ribeiro – Universidade de Aveiro



filipa.ribeiro@gmail.com
Outline

   Relationship between science and
    utopia in today‟s R&D centres;

   The role of science communication;

   Description of today‟s scientists‟
    utopias;
Main objectives
   To understand what utopias scientists have and
    relate them to key-indicators:
       science as a way of knowledge;
       science as a job;
       science in relation to communication.


   To understand the possible relations between
    scientists‟ utopias, the concept of knowledge and
    contemporary science communication.
Background

   Both science and utopia examine impossible
    possibilities that can, in the future, become
    feasible.

   Both are guided by ideals and antecipate the
    future.


   Utopia opens the way for new paradigms.
Background

   «how to know» vs the «know-how».

   Utopia focuses in knowing «how to be».

   Utopia may release science from its own fears,
    dogmas and prejudices.

   It isn‟t enough to know how it is, we must know
    «how it should be»
Background

   Utopia shows science that there are not only new
    paradigms emerging, but also parallel paradigms.


   Utopia is the motivation to reach new knowledge
    (through communication).


   Utopia challenges science, communication and
    overlaps ethics.
Methods

   May 2008 – October 2008;

   1684 e-mails were sent to scientists from all over
    the world;

   Natural sciences: 1149 e-mails

   Social sciences: 535
Methods

   Data sample: 388 scientists;

   Random sampling method;

   The data about the participants were obtained
    through:
       Public Library of Science (Plos One, Plos Genetics,
        Plos Clinical Trials, Plos Medicine, Plos Computational
        Biology, Plos Biology, Plos Pathogens;
       the websites of the universities randomly chosen;
       a personal contact list.
Methods
Methods
   Variables:
       sex;
       age;
       geographical location;
       scientific field.


   Question:
    “What is your greatest utopia as a scientist/researcher?”


   The obtained data was analyzed using SPSS.
Methods
                        1.1) science as a type of
                        knowledge;
1. collective utopias   1.2) science as a job;
                        1.3) utopias related to
                        science communication.


                        2.1) science as a type of
2. individual utopias   knowledge;
                        2.2) science as a job;
                        2.3) utopias related to
                        science communication.

3. without utopias
Results

   Respondents:
       average age = 41.7 years;
       youngest individual: 24 years old;
       oldest individual = 70 years old.


   Shunting line standard = 8.4

   Variance is almost 70.
Results
   “To have some answers to questions like: do we make
    the universe or is the universe that makes us?”;

   “To win the nobel prize”;

   “I would say 'reductionism, i.e., understanding
    macroscopic bahaviour from microscopic laws„”;

   “To discover an amazing technique or invention or
    product that would benefit the consumers worldwide and
    be a hit commercially worldwide”;
Results
   “That one day scientists will also have the same fame,
    fans, and finances as some other celebrities have; and
    that young and old people will look up to, admire and
    fantacise about scientists”;

   “God”;

   “To simulate life”;

   “The uncovering of new knowledge that is „worth‟
    uncovering, and the sight of the face of a student when a
    new discovery is made in their hands.”;
Results

                 Europe                           Africa




                                                           America




Distribution of the answers obtained compared to the ones that were sent.
Results




Comparative synthesis
                                            CURK: Colective utopia related to knowledge
among the different types of           IUSJ: Individual utopias related to science as a job
utopias within the groups of                  IUK: Individual utopias related to knowledge
                               IUSC: Individual utopias related to Science communication
natural and social sciences.                                                NU: No utopias
Results
             Phylo   Psycho   Sociol.   Econo   Journal.   Educat.   Polit.   Demog.   Hist.   Geog.

 CU
 Knowledge


IU
Knowledge



IU
JOB



 IU
 Comm


 No
 utopias


 Synthesis of the type of utopias mentioned in the social sciences group
Results
                Envir.           Astro-   Physics   Che   Eco-   Biolo   Medi   P.H.
                         Maths                      m                                  Eng.
                                 nomy                     logy   gy      cine


CU
Knowledge



IU
Knowledge



IU
JOB



IU
Comm



No
utopias


 Synthesis of the type of utopias mentioned in the natural sciences group.
Results




Distribution of utopias according to                CURK: Colective utopia related to knowledge
                                               IUSJ: Individual utopias related to science as a job
gender within the group of social                     IUK: Individual utopias related to knowledge
sciences.                              IUSC: Individual utopias related to Science communication
                                                                                    NU: No utopias
Results                        Penso que falta a
                                   legenda, ou título
                                   do gráf.




Distribution of utopias by sex within the group of natural sciences.
Discussion

   There is a uniformity within the utopias mentioned
    by researchers from the natural and social
    sciences;

   Higher prevalence of researchers without utopias;

   There are new opportunities towards another
    concept of science which would be nearer the
    concept of post-human science;
Discussion
   There isn‟t an explicit and clear relationship
    between utopia, science and communication;
   Science communication is still an activity that is
    undervalued by the scientific community;
   Science is still seen as the use of capable rational
    skills and as a discovery method that postulates
    freely chosen concepts.

    e.g.: “I don't relate utopia to science. Science
          has very well defined and achievable
    purposes, so there's not much utopic about it”
                                        Scientist from Singapore
Summary
   It was obtained a very realistic environment,
    which is essential for communication studies;
   Europe is the Continent with the highest
    percentage of answers from the category of “no
    utopias” (34.9%) and Africa has the highest
    percentage of collective utopias related to
    knowledge (22.4%);
   Greater prevalence of individual utopias within the
    natural sciences, as well as with the utopias
    related to the job itself.
Summary

   America is where there are “more complete”
    visions about science;


   Gender does not influence views about
    contemporary science, despite the fact that
    female researchers express more worries about
    the impact of science in society;
I believe…

…that utopia is the greatest challenge that mankind
has to deal with…

and…

If you can look into the seeds of time and say which
grain will grow and which will not, speak…
                               William Shakespeare, Macbeth
Questions, comments,
suggestions…


Thank you for your attention!




                     filipa.ribeiro@gmail.com

More Related Content

PPTX
Human and natural sciences for ToK
PPT
Michael A. Rappenglück - The human face of science trends, challenges, and de...
PPTX
To k and natural sciences
PPT
Meaning science
PDF
Feyerabend, Pluralism and Progress in Science in Against Method 1993 and the ...
PPTX
Unit 3. Anything goes?
PDF
SCIENCE FOR CHANGE AGENTS
PDF
"What is this thing called science?"(Chapter10 and Chapter11)
Human and natural sciences for ToK
Michael A. Rappenglück - The human face of science trends, challenges, and de...
To k and natural sciences
Meaning science
Feyerabend, Pluralism and Progress in Science in Against Method 1993 and the ...
Unit 3. Anything goes?
SCIENCE FOR CHANGE AGENTS
"What is this thing called science?"(Chapter10 and Chapter11)

What's hot (20)

PPT
Introduction to Natural Science
PDF
Unit 1 - What Is Science?
PDF
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...
PDF
What is science? Science, pseudoscience, non-science
PDF
Human sciences final
PPTX
Philosophy math and science curriculum
PPTX
Human Sciences for ToK
PPTX
Intelligibility of science with ecocentrism and khalifah
PDF
Life, Knowledge and Natural Selection ― How life (scientifically) designs its...
PPT
Feminism
DOCX
Falsifiability
PDF
Patokorpi logic of sherlock holmes in technology enhanced learning - articulo
PPT
Paradigms Thomas kuhn Theory
PDF
Jacques vallee 1
PPT
Ins and outs of transdisciplinary research
PDF
Discovery of the fourth dimension mental time travel and human evolution (s...
PPT
Natural sciences 2012 13
PDF
Evolution vs creation science
PPTX
POL SOC 360 Science Society Social Research
PDF
Theory in anthropology since the sixties sherry ortner
Introduction to Natural Science
Unit 1 - What Is Science?
Evolutionary epistemology versus faith and justified true belief: Does scien...
What is science? Science, pseudoscience, non-science
Human sciences final
Philosophy math and science curriculum
Human Sciences for ToK
Intelligibility of science with ecocentrism and khalifah
Life, Knowledge and Natural Selection ― How life (scientifically) designs its...
Feminism
Falsifiability
Patokorpi logic of sherlock holmes in technology enhanced learning - articulo
Paradigms Thomas kuhn Theory
Jacques vallee 1
Ins and outs of transdisciplinary research
Discovery of the fourth dimension mental time travel and human evolution (s...
Natural sciences 2012 13
Evolution vs creation science
POL SOC 360 Science Society Social Research
Theory in anthropology since the sixties sherry ortner
Ad

Viewers also liked (7)

PPTX
Beauty and Utopia
PDF
ArtEZ Architecture Arnhem - Lightness (Utopia) - january2013
PPT
Persuasive power point
PPT
Impossibility Of Utopia
PDF
How to Build Utopia
PPTX
Utopia Themed Entertainment Design And Production
PPTX
THE UTOPIAN SOCIETY OF ERANE
Beauty and Utopia
ArtEZ Architecture Arnhem - Lightness (Utopia) - january2013
Persuasive power point
Impossibility Of Utopia
How to Build Utopia
Utopia Themed Entertainment Design And Production
THE UTOPIAN SOCIETY OF ERANE
Ad

Similar to The Place Of Utopia In Todays Science (20)

PDF
Sujay the Sociology of Science FINAL FINAL FINAL - Copy (2).pdf
PPT
Ins and outs of transdisciplinary research
PPTX
The new style of thinking
PDF
The Limits Of Science Essays
PDF
Sujay Rao Mandavilli Weaponizing intellctual revolutions in no-western cultur...
PPT
History, Philosophy & Theory in Visualization: Everything you know is wrong
PDF
PDF
Science Essay Topic
PPTX
Development Unbound: Utopistic non-linearity in social projections
PPTX
Toleukhan A. MIW №4.pptx
PDF
Science And Scientific Method
PPTX
SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-AND-SOCIETY-GE-107-Autosaved-the-second-14-1.pptx
PDF
219073317-Sociology-Unit-1-Notes.pdf
PPTX
SCIENCE^LJ TECHNOLOGY^LJ AND SOCIETY.pptx
PPTX
Presentation The Big Bang.pptx
PDF
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
PDF
Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL (2).pdf
PDF
Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdf
PPT
1605036123-introduction-to-philosophy-of-science.ppt
DOCX
NatSci - BQ5 exploration points (2022-23).docx
Sujay the Sociology of Science FINAL FINAL FINAL - Copy (2).pdf
Ins and outs of transdisciplinary research
The new style of thinking
The Limits Of Science Essays
Sujay Rao Mandavilli Weaponizing intellctual revolutions in no-western cultur...
History, Philosophy & Theory in Visualization: Everything you know is wrong
Science Essay Topic
Development Unbound: Utopistic non-linearity in social projections
Toleukhan A. MIW №4.pptx
Science And Scientific Method
SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-AND-SOCIETY-GE-107-Autosaved-the-second-14-1.pptx
219073317-Sociology-Unit-1-Notes.pdf
SCIENCE^LJ TECHNOLOGY^LJ AND SOCIETY.pptx
Presentation The Big Bang.pptx
Science v Pseudoscience: What’s the Difference? - Kevin Korb
Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL (2).pdf
Sujay Certainty Uncertainty principle FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdf
1605036123-introduction-to-philosophy-of-science.ppt
NatSci - BQ5 exploration points (2022-23).docx

More from Filipa M. Ribeiro (13)

PDF
Combining permanence and change:the strength of strong ideals
PPTX
Governing modes and the European Research Area: (non) plus ultra?
PPT
Genetics, evolution, communication: a love story
PPTX
Knowledge regimes
PDF
Quem São Elas_o crime do queijo
PDF
Communication and Science in the land of utopias
PDF
Livro Textos De Amor
PDF
Livro Patrimoniogenetico
PDF
MudançAs Climaticas E ComunicaçãO
PDF
Jornadas Jornalismo Ufp 2008vsfinal
PPTX
Utopia E Cinema Filipa
PPT
A Cor Da Ciencia
PDF
The Bodys Mistake
Combining permanence and change:the strength of strong ideals
Governing modes and the European Research Area: (non) plus ultra?
Genetics, evolution, communication: a love story
Knowledge regimes
Quem São Elas_o crime do queijo
Communication and Science in the land of utopias
Livro Textos De Amor
Livro Patrimoniogenetico
MudançAs Climaticas E ComunicaçãO
Jornadas Jornalismo Ufp 2008vsfinal
Utopia E Cinema Filipa
A Cor Da Ciencia
The Bodys Mistake

The Place Of Utopia In Todays Science

  • 1. The place of utopia in today’s science Filipa M. Ribeiro – Universidade de Aveiro filipa.ribeiro@gmail.com
  • 2. Outline  Relationship between science and utopia in today‟s R&D centres;  The role of science communication;  Description of today‟s scientists‟ utopias;
  • 3. Main objectives  To understand what utopias scientists have and relate them to key-indicators:  science as a way of knowledge;  science as a job;  science in relation to communication.  To understand the possible relations between scientists‟ utopias, the concept of knowledge and contemporary science communication.
  • 4. Background  Both science and utopia examine impossible possibilities that can, in the future, become feasible.  Both are guided by ideals and antecipate the future.  Utopia opens the way for new paradigms.
  • 5. Background  «how to know» vs the «know-how».  Utopia focuses in knowing «how to be».  Utopia may release science from its own fears, dogmas and prejudices.  It isn‟t enough to know how it is, we must know «how it should be»
  • 6. Background  Utopia shows science that there are not only new paradigms emerging, but also parallel paradigms.  Utopia is the motivation to reach new knowledge (through communication).  Utopia challenges science, communication and overlaps ethics.
  • 7. Methods  May 2008 – October 2008;  1684 e-mails were sent to scientists from all over the world;  Natural sciences: 1149 e-mails  Social sciences: 535
  • 8. Methods  Data sample: 388 scientists;  Random sampling method;  The data about the participants were obtained through:  Public Library of Science (Plos One, Plos Genetics, Plos Clinical Trials, Plos Medicine, Plos Computational Biology, Plos Biology, Plos Pathogens;  the websites of the universities randomly chosen;  a personal contact list.
  • 10. Methods  Variables:  sex;  age;  geographical location;  scientific field.  Question: “What is your greatest utopia as a scientist/researcher?”  The obtained data was analyzed using SPSS.
  • 11. Methods 1.1) science as a type of knowledge; 1. collective utopias 1.2) science as a job; 1.3) utopias related to science communication. 2.1) science as a type of 2. individual utopias knowledge; 2.2) science as a job; 2.3) utopias related to science communication. 3. without utopias
  • 12. Results  Respondents:  average age = 41.7 years;  youngest individual: 24 years old;  oldest individual = 70 years old.  Shunting line standard = 8.4  Variance is almost 70.
  • 13. Results  “To have some answers to questions like: do we make the universe or is the universe that makes us?”;  “To win the nobel prize”;  “I would say 'reductionism, i.e., understanding macroscopic bahaviour from microscopic laws„”;  “To discover an amazing technique or invention or product that would benefit the consumers worldwide and be a hit commercially worldwide”;
  • 14. Results  “That one day scientists will also have the same fame, fans, and finances as some other celebrities have; and that young and old people will look up to, admire and fantacise about scientists”;  “God”;  “To simulate life”;  “The uncovering of new knowledge that is „worth‟ uncovering, and the sight of the face of a student when a new discovery is made in their hands.”;
  • 15. Results Europe Africa America Distribution of the answers obtained compared to the ones that were sent.
  • 16. Results Comparative synthesis CURK: Colective utopia related to knowledge among the different types of IUSJ: Individual utopias related to science as a job utopias within the groups of IUK: Individual utopias related to knowledge IUSC: Individual utopias related to Science communication natural and social sciences. NU: No utopias
  • 17. Results Phylo Psycho Sociol. Econo Journal. Educat. Polit. Demog. Hist. Geog. CU Knowledge IU Knowledge IU JOB IU Comm No utopias Synthesis of the type of utopias mentioned in the social sciences group
  • 18. Results Envir. Astro- Physics Che Eco- Biolo Medi P.H. Maths m Eng. nomy logy gy cine CU Knowledge IU Knowledge IU JOB IU Comm No utopias Synthesis of the type of utopias mentioned in the natural sciences group.
  • 19. Results Distribution of utopias according to CURK: Colective utopia related to knowledge IUSJ: Individual utopias related to science as a job gender within the group of social IUK: Individual utopias related to knowledge sciences. IUSC: Individual utopias related to Science communication NU: No utopias
  • 20. Results Penso que falta a legenda, ou título do gráf. Distribution of utopias by sex within the group of natural sciences.
  • 21. Discussion  There is a uniformity within the utopias mentioned by researchers from the natural and social sciences;  Higher prevalence of researchers without utopias;  There are new opportunities towards another concept of science which would be nearer the concept of post-human science;
  • 22. Discussion  There isn‟t an explicit and clear relationship between utopia, science and communication;  Science communication is still an activity that is undervalued by the scientific community;  Science is still seen as the use of capable rational skills and as a discovery method that postulates freely chosen concepts. e.g.: “I don't relate utopia to science. Science has very well defined and achievable purposes, so there's not much utopic about it” Scientist from Singapore
  • 23. Summary  It was obtained a very realistic environment, which is essential for communication studies;  Europe is the Continent with the highest percentage of answers from the category of “no utopias” (34.9%) and Africa has the highest percentage of collective utopias related to knowledge (22.4%);  Greater prevalence of individual utopias within the natural sciences, as well as with the utopias related to the job itself.
  • 24. Summary  America is where there are “more complete” visions about science;  Gender does not influence views about contemporary science, despite the fact that female researchers express more worries about the impact of science in society;
  • 25. I believe… …that utopia is the greatest challenge that mankind has to deal with… and… If you can look into the seeds of time and say which grain will grow and which will not, speak… William Shakespeare, Macbeth
  • 26. Questions, comments, suggestions… Thank you for your attention! filipa.ribeiro@gmail.com