Three zone detection and distance relay co-ordination of power system protection

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)
Vol. 11, No. 2, April 2021, pp. 919~928
ISSN: 2088-8708, DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v11i2.pp919-928  919
Journal homepage: http://ijece.iaescore.com
Three zone detection and distance relay co-ordination of power
system protection
Cholleti Sriram1
, Y. Kusumalatha2
1
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, India
2
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Rise Krishna Sai Prakasam Group of Institutions, India
Article Info ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received Aug 20, 2019
Revised Jul 27, 2020
Accepted Sep 5, 2020
To secure the transmission lines against power system faults, the distance
relays are mostly used. Distance relay has its own resistance (R)-reactance
(X)-characteristics. Co-ordination of different distance relays is necessary for
the fast operation of circuit breaker. Various distance relays which are being
tripped with respect to circuit breakers which are attached at individual buses
faraway from each other. These relays will be operated with respect to the
distance between the occurred fault and relay location. In this paper,
detection of three zones using relay characteristics, co-ordination of distance
relays and circuit breakers are shown with the faults placed at different
locations of an IEEE 9 bus system using MATLAB/Simulink GUI
environment. A comparison also made between the relays performance and
circuit breaker tripping operation with respect to severe faults at different
locations on IEEE 9 bus system.
Keywords:
Distance relay
IEEE 9 bus system
MATLAB
Relay co-ordination
Zone detection
This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.
Corresponding Author:
Cholleti Sriram
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
Vaddeswaram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
Email: cholletisriram6@gmail.com
1. INTRODUCTION
With day by day increase in power demand, results the power system to be more stressed. Due to
these sudden increase in power demand where the power generation remains constant for a short period of
time, the power system experiencing major disturbances like heavily loaded, cascaded outage of lines which
may allow to grids blackout [1]. Inorder to prevent darkness due to blackout, it is essential to block the
multiple outages of lines [2, 3]. Distance Relays are mostly used protection system for transmission lines,
which are also play a crucial role in preserve the security as well as reliability of supply [4, 5]. Distance
Relays will provide three zone schemes of protection. Compared to the first and second zones, third zone is
vulnerable and will have a wide area of protection [5]. Due to any disturbance, the impedance identified by
relay will go in for the third zone of mho relay characteristics, the relay will consider as a fault and relay
operates which it should not. This maloperation of relay under stressed conditions can cause blackout [6-8].
So, it is necessary to detect the zones of the relay before blocking of the relay maloperation. By using
conventinal relays, the circuit breakers will trip the supply to the nearby fault whch is required and inaddition
the circuit breakers connected faraway from severe fault may also trip the supply which is not required [9].
This interrupted power supply from the source to the loadends may effect the consumer side products
[10-12]. Inorder to reduce this effect, the relays and circuit breakers should be in co-ordination. The distance
relay and respective circuit breaker should respond only if the fault is near to the relay, called as primary
relay but not to be operated if the fault is faraway from the relay, it should need to operate only if the

 ISSN: 2088-8708
Int J Elec & Comp Eng, Vol. 11, No. 2, April 2021 : 919 - 928
920
required circuit breaker not responded, called as backup realy [13]. To acomplish the relay co-operation, mho
type relays are used, the operation is done with reference to the admittance evaluated at the specific node
[14]. The power system having used numbers of transmission lines and needs to protect all these transmission
lines by using fast responding relay [15].
An elementary mho relay [16] ahead with a 2-bus test network shall be observed in Figure 1. The
vectors from Figure 1 are set off by current I through the line with a change of resistsnce R, reactance X and
impedance Z values. The resistance R value and the X is considered to be the real and imaginary values
respectively. The impedance (R-X) characteritics is the marked by using the measured current and voltage at
a particular tarnsmission line. Impedance angle is determined by comparing the angles between V, said to be
polarizing quantity and IZ said to be conducting quantity. Considered E is Grid or supply and fault occurred
on line. The circle diagram also presented in Figure 1 for more clarity on representation of system parameters
used in grid system. Morevore, the relay can able to measure the current flowing through line continuously to
work accordingly occurance of fault on the system [17].
Impedance charactersitics or R-X plot always fluctuate with variation in the diameter of the
respective zone, if a transient state [18] happen on the line such as severe fault at both the ends of the
respective line. When the current and impedance relation changes which are generally inverse to each other,
the performance of the relay also varies. During steadystate conditions, the impedance Z value is high
because the V is greater than the current I. So, the impedance measured by relay will never enter into the R-X
characteristics in result relay will not respond. But during abnormal such as fault conditions, the value of V
falldown to a low value whereas the I value suddenly raises which makes the Z value to falldown [19, 20],
results the relay will respond immediately. The circuit breakers which are attached to the power carrying
lines are operated with variation in Z value with reference to the faults, either at source or at load ends. To
view mho relay co-ordination, this paper considers an IEEE 9 bus system. The severe faults are taking place
at various placements and observed the switching operation of the breakers with reference to the fault
distance from the relay placement [21].
An IEEE 9 bus system [22] which actually consists of 3 PV generating sources at respective buses 1,
2 and 3. Three PQ load buses at buses 5, 6 and 8 respectively. The six 230 kV operating lines which are
medium lines. The total power system network is a ring main system where 3 PV sources out of one
generating source acts as a slack bus and three PQ loads are connected with respect to each other by
allocating the active and reactive power from all the sources. IEEE 9 bus system single line diagram is shown
in Figure 2. PV source each generates active power at various voltages [23] and dissimilar capacity of step up
transformers are interconnected to each other. Individual transformer secondaries are maintained at 230 kV.
Figure 1. Mho relay function Figure 2. Placement of distance relays R79, R47 and R49
of IEEE 9 bus system
Impedance is generally considered with resistance R and reactance X, as given below
Z = R + jX (1)
Now the complex impedance signal is converted to polar form inorder to fing the angles of each parameter,
given as

Int J Elec & Comp Eng ISSN: 2088-8708 
Three zone detection and distance relay co-ordination of power system protection (Cholleti Sriram)
921
Z| = (|V|)/(|I|) (2)
∟Z = ∟V - ∟I (3)
Consider a most severe fault is created for sudden change in current in the transmission lines.
Modelling of IEEE 9 bus system with three distance relays are: i) Distance relay R79: R79 is placed at bus
7-9 which ensures three zone protection of power carrying lines connecting from bus 7 to bus 8 and bus 8 to
bus 9; ii) Distance relay R47: R47 is placed at bus 4-7 which ensures three zone protection of power carrying
lines connecting from bus 4 to bus 5 and bus 5 to bus 7; iii) Distance relay R49: R49 is placed at bus 4-9
which ensures three zone protection of power carrying lines connecting from bus 4 to bus 6 and bus 6 to bus
9. R79, R47 and R49 relays are used to ensure three zone protection of the power system which are placed at
different places also shown in Figure 2. These distance relays will sense the fault and make the circuit
breakers to operate if necessary. Three circuit breakers are: i) Circuit Breaker CB1: Operates when signals
sent by the distance relay R79; ii) Circuit Breaker CB2: Operates when signals sent by the distance relay
R47; iii) Circuit Breaker CB3: Operates when signals sent by the distance relay R49 connected at system. A
three-phase fault is applied at respective buses at 0.3 secs and fault cleared at 0.5 secs. Simulation run for
0.7 secs.
2. ZONAL SCHEME OF PROTECTION
To ensure complete protection of a power system, it requires to operate a distance relay for three
zones. Zone-1 operates for 80% of first line, Zone 2 operates for 100% of first line plus 20% of second line
and Zone 3 operates for 100% of first line plus 100% of second line. So that a distance relay provides
protection for two transmission lines. Zone 2 and Zone 3 also acts as a backup relays with a time delay
[24, 25]. The three-zone protection scheme of IEEE 9 bus system is shown in the Figure 3. Figure 3(a) shows
three zone protection of relay R79. Figure 3(b) shows three zone protection of relay R47. Figure 3(c) shows
three zone protection of relay R49.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 3. Three zone scheme of protection, (a) R79 three zone scheme, (b) R47 three zone scheme,
(c) R49 three zone scheme

 ISSN: 2088-8708
922
The design of distance relays shown in Figure 4 which detects the zone of the relay. The zone
detection is designed as shown in Figure 4 is based on if and else programming. If the impedance evaluated
by distance relay is less than the impedance setting of the respective relay, then this design shows at which
zone the relay is going to operate.
Figure 4. Zone detection simulink design
3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
3.1. Distance relay characteristics
To protect the transmission lines of IEEE 9 bus system, the distance relays R79, R47 and R49 are
placed. To understand the relay operation, the three phases to ground fault is applied at 0.3 secs and cleared
at 0.5 secs at different distances far from the relay position. The simulation has run for the following different
fault occurable cases:
 Fault at 60 km far from bus 7-9;
3.1.1. Distance relay R79
The settings of the distance relay R79 placed at bus 7-9 is shown in the Table 1.
Table 1. R79 settings
Protective Zones Zonal Percentage Z (Ohms)
Zone-1 80% of Bus 7-Bus 8 25.80
Zone-2 100% of Bus 7-Bus 8 + 20% of Bus 8-Bus 9 49.00
Zone-3 100% of Bus 7-8 + 100% Bus 8-Bus 9 116.80
 Fault at 60 km far from bus 7-9
A three-phase fault is placed at 60 km, 110 km and 160 km far from R79 relay and the design of distance
relay is shown in the Figure 5(a), reveals the variations of resistance and reactance values due to fault for
all the three phases. The impedance variation due to fault is entering into the zone 1 characteristics as
shown in Figure 5(b), zone 2 characteristics as shown in Figure 6 and zone 3 characteristics as shown in
Figure 7. So, the relay R79 operates and makes the CB1 to trip.
 Fault at 110 km far from bus 7-9 as shown in Figure 6

923
(a) (b)
Figure 5. (a) Design of distance relay R79, (b) R79 R-X characteristics
Figure 6. R79 R-X characteristics Figure 7. R79 R-X characteristics
The settings of the distance relay R47 placed at bus 4-7 is indicated in the Table 2.
Protective Zones Zonal Percentage Z (Ohms)
Zone-1 80% of Bus 4-Bus 5 30.40
Zone-3 100% of Bus 4-Bus 5 + 100 % Bus 5-Bus 7 155.80
A three-phase fault is applied at 60 km, 110 km and 160 km far from R47 relay and the design of distance
relay is same as shown in the Figure 5(a), reveals the variations of resistance and reactance values due to
fault for all the three phases. The impedance variation due to fault is entering into the zone 1
characteristics as shown in Figure 8, zone 2 characteristics as shown in Figure 9 and zone 3
characteristics as shown in Figure 10. So, the relay R47 operates and makes the CB2 to trip.

 ISSN: 2088-8708
924
Figure 8. R47 R-X characteristics
The settings of the distance relay R49 placed at bus 4-9 is indicated in the Table 3. A three-phase
fault is applied at 60 km, 110 km and 160 km far from R49 relay and the design of distance relay is same as
shown in the Figure 5(a). Reveals the variations of resistance and reactance values due to fault for all the
three phases. The impedance variation due to fault is entering into the zone 1 characteristics as shown in
Figure 11, zone 2 characteristics as shown in Figure 12 and zone 3 characteristics as shown in Figure 13. So,
the relay R49 operates and makes the CB3 to trip.
Protective Zones Line Zonal Percentage Z (Ohms)
Zone-1 80 % of Bus 4-Bus 6 33.40
Zone-3 100% of Bus 4-6 + 100 % Bus 6-9 168.30

925
Figure 11. R49 R-X characteristics
3.1.4. Operation of circuit breakers CB1, CB2, CB3
The circuit breakers are tripped using relays R79, R47 and R49 where the impedance is evaluated by
examining current and voltageof individual line. From the above section, it is observed that the distance
relays R79, R47 and R49 are responding to the three-phase fault and are operating with respect to measured
impedance seen between the locations of fault and relay. When the relays sense the fault, it sends tripping
signals to the respective circuit breakers CB1, CB2 and CB3. It is observed that all the three single phase
individual circuit breakers trip to logic ‘0’ when the fault takes place at 0.3 secs and opens the transmission
line. When the fault is cleared at 0.5 secs the circuit breakers CB1, CB2 and CB3 of all three phases will
increase to logic ‘1’ which is implemented in this simulation with the help of [8-14].
3.2. Relay co-ordination
Characteristics of R47 and R49: Consider when R79 operates due to three-phase to ground fault
160 km far from bus 7-9, the relay which is placed near to the fault location should operate i.e. R79 operates.
Where as the other relays R47 and R49 should not operate which means there should be the co-ordination
between the relays. The impedance measured by the R79 will enter into the R-X characteristics and the relay
R79 operates as observed in Figure 5(b). But the impedance measured by other relays R47 and R49 will not
enter into the R-X characteristics as shown in Figure 14 and Figure 15.

 ISSN: 2088-8708
926
3.3. Circuit breaker co-ordination
It is clearly observed that the breaker CB1 trips which near to the fault at bus 7-9 rather the other
circuit breakers CB2 and CB3 are very far from location of fault is not operated as there is no much variation
in line impedance which means circuit breaker co-ordination can be observed in Figure 16 and Figure 17.
The relay co-ordination and the circuit breaker co-ordination for the above cases are indicated in Table 4,
Table 5 where NT indicates as No Trip, Z1, Z2, Z3 indicates as Zones 1, 2 and 3.
Figure 16. CB2 non-tripping signals Figure 17. CB3 non-tripping signals

927
Table 4. Relay co-ordination
Fault/Relay Fault on Bus 7-9 Fault on Bus 4-7 Fault on Bus 4-9
60 km 110 km 160 km 60 km 110 km 160 km 60 km 110 km 160 km
R79
Z1
Trips
Z2
Trips
Z3
Trips
NT NT NT NT NT NT
R47 NT NT NT
Z1
Trips
Z2
Trips
Z3
Trips
NT NT NT
R49 NT NT NT NT NT NT
Z1
Trips
Z2
Trips
Z3
Trips
Table 5. Circuit breaker co-ordination
Fault/CB Fault on Bus 7-9 Fault on Bus 4-7 Fault on Bus 4-9
60 km 110 km 160 km 60 km 110 km 160 km 60 km 110 km 160 km
CB1 Trips Trips Trips NT NT NT NT NT NT
CB2 NT NT NT Trips Trips Trips NT NT NT
CB3 NT NT NT NT NT NT Trips Trips Trips
4. CONCLUSION
The above simulation results, reveals that the distance relays R79, R47 and R49 will operate
whenever three phase faults is taking place at any distance and also ensures the three-zone protection of
relay. The circuit breakers CB1, CB2 and CB3 are tripped with respect to the signals sent by the relays.
When the relay operates which is close to the fault location, the other relays should not operate means relay
co-ordination is done. Similarly, the circuit breakers which are linked near to the fault is immediately tripped
where as the circuit breakers linked faraway from the fault are untripped. The impedances evaluated at buses
7-9, bus 4-7 and bus 4-9 are different in values when the location of fault is different and the respective
relays will trip only when the measured impedance falls less than the setting value.
REFERENCES
[1] D. Tziouvaras, “Relay performance during major system disturbances,” Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.,
2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.selinc.com.
[2] C. Sriram and Y. Kusumalatha, “A Review on Power Swing Blocking Schemes of Distance Relay During Stable
Power Swings,” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), vol. 8, no. 4,
pp. 636-641, 2019.
[3] J.P.E. Mooney and N. Fischer, “Application guidelines for power swing detection on transmission systems,” Power
system conference, pp. 159-168, 2006.
[4] K. Andanapalli and M. Biswal, “An enhanced power swing and symmetrical fault discrimination logic for
integrated power network,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 30, no. 7, 2020.
[5] S. B. Wilkinson and C. A. Mathews, “Dynamic characteristics of Mho Distance Relays,” GE Publication
GER-3742, pp. 1-9.
[6] T. Jose, et al., “Integrated approach based third zone protection during stressed system conditions,” Electrical
Systems Power Research, vol. 161, pp. 199-211, 2018.
[7] S. H. Horowitz and A. G. Phadke, “Third zone revisited,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 1,
pp. 23-29, 2006.
[8] P. K. Nayak, et al., “Secured zone 3 protection during stressed condition,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery,
vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 89-96, Feb 2015.
[9] G. E. Alaxander and J. G. Andrichak, “Ground Distance Relaying: Problems and Principles,” GE Publication
GER-3793, pp. 1-36, 1991.
[10] M. Begovic, et al., “Trends in power system protection and control,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 30, no. 3,
pp. 269-278, 2001.
[11] R. G. Farmer, “Power System Dynamics and Stability,” The Electric Power Engineering Handbook, in L. L.
Grigsby, Boca Raton, CRC Press LLC, 2001.
[12] U. K. Jethwa, et al., “Comprehensive Load-Shedding System,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,
vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 740-749, 2010.
[13] M. H. Idris, et al., “Teaching Distance Relay Using Matlab/Simulink Graphical User Interface,” Malaysian
Technical Universities Conference on Engineering & Technology, 2013, pp. 264-270.
[14] M. L. S. S. Kumar, et al., “Fault Detection During Power Swing in a TCSC-Compensated Transmission Line Based
on Clark’s Transform and Teager–Kaiser Energy Operator,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology,
Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40998-020-00344-2
[15] C. Sriram, et al., “Blocking the distance relay operation in third zone during power swing using polynomial curve
fitting method,” 2014 International Conference on Smart Electric Grid (ISEG), Guntur, 2014, pp. 1-7.
[16] M. Mc. Donald, et al., “Power Swing and out of step considerations on transmission lines,” IEEE PSRC WG D6,
2005.

 ISSN: 2088-8708
928
[17] T. Athay, et al., “A practical method for the direct analysis of transient stability,” IEEE Transactions on Power
Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-98, no. 2, pp. 573-584, 1979.
[18] A.A. Fouad and S.E. Stanton, “Transient stability of a multi-machine power system. Part II: Critical transient
energy,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-100, no. 7, pp. 3417-3424, 1981.
[19] N.Z. Mohamad and A.F. Abidin, “A New Technique for High Resistance Fault Detection during Power Swing for
Distance Relay,” AASRI Conference on Power and Energy Systems, pp. 50-55, 2012.
[20] P.K. Dash and S.K. Panda, “Fast estimation of voltage and current phasors in power networks using an adaptive
neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1494-1499, 1997.
[21] P. Bhui and N. Senroy, “Real-time prediction and control of transient stability using transient energy function,”
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 923-934, 2017.
[22] M. C. Shekar and N. Aarthi, “Contingency Analysis of IEEE 9 Bus System,” 2018 3rd IEEE International
Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore,
India, 2018, pp. 2225-2229.
[23] Boussadia F. and Belkhiat S., “A new algorithm to prevent maloperation of distance protection zone 3 during wide‐
area disturbances,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2018.
[24] K. R. Padiyar and S. Krishna, “Online detection of loss of synchronism using energy function criterion,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 46-55, 2006.
[25] S. Sharma, et al., “Performance analysis of IEEE 9 Bus system using TCSC,” 2017 Recent Developments in
Control, Automation & Power Engineering (RDCAPE), Noida, 2017, pp. 251-256.

Three zone detection and distance relay co-ordination of power system protection

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Three zone detection and distance relay co-ordination of power system protection (20)

More from IJECEIAES (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Three zone detection and distance relay co-ordination of power system protection