SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Test of Reading Comprehension
   By: Sami Napier & Sabrina Richardson
   To identify students whose scores are
    significantly below those of their peers and who
    might need interventions designed to improve
    reading comprehension
   To determine areas of relative strength and
    weakness across reading comprehension abilities
   To document overall progress in reading
    development as a consequences of interventions
    programs
   To serve as a measure for research efforts
    designed to investigate reading comprehension
   Ages, 0-7 and 11-17
   Able to understand directions of subtests
   Able to formulate the necessary responses
   Able to read English
   No time limits
   The entire test varies from 30 minutes to 90
    minutes
   The average time being an hour
   Each subtest generally takes 5-15 minutes
Torc 3 final
Torc 3 final
   Shorten testing time
   Avoid giving readers items that are too
    difficult
   Purpose: to measure the reader’s
    understanding of vocabulary that is related to
    a general concept
   Description: 25 vocabulary questions
   Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any
    five-item sequence have been answered
    incorrectly
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: to measure the reader’s
    understanding of meaningfully similar but
    syntactically different sentence structures
   Description: 20 questions
   Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any
    five-item sequence have been answered
    incorrectly
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: ability to answer questions related to
    the paragraph
   Description: 6 paragraphs with 5 questions
    each
        The first question requires the student to choose the best
         title that conveys the overall theme
        The second and fifth questions recall story details
        The third question makes an inference
        The fourth question makes a negative inference
   Ceiling: reached when two items or more
    questions for any story are answered
    incorrectly
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: measure the ability to order
    sentences into a paragraph
   Description: 10 test questions
        Consisting of 5 randomly ordered sentences and the
         reader has to put them in the correct order to form a
         paragraph
   Ceiling: reached when any two items in a row
    have a score of 3 or lower
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: understanding of mathematics
    vocabulary
   Description: 25 test questions
   Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any
    five-item sequence have been answered
    incorrectly
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: understand social studies
    vocabulary
   Description: 25 test questions
   Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any
    five-item sequence have been answered
    incorrectly
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: understanding of science vocabulary
   Description: 25 test questions
   Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any
    five-item sequence have been answered
    incorrectly
Torc 3 final
   Purpose: measures understanding of written
    directions commonly found in schoolwork
   Description: 25 test questions
        Consist of a printed command that the student has to
         carry out on the answer sheet
   Ceiling: no ceiling, all items should be
    accepted
Torc 3 final
   Raw Scores: total number of points correct
    for each subtest
   Grade Equivalent: Indicates the reading
    comprehension grade level that corresponds
    to the raw score made by the student
   Age Equivalent: Indicates the age level that
    corresponds to the raw score made by the
    student
   Percentiles: Represent a value on a scale of
    100 that indicates the percentage of the
    distribution that is equal or below the value.
      Example: 90% of a 12 year old indicates that 90 % of the
       sample at that age scored at or below the raw score.
   Subtest Standard Scores: These scores
    provide the clearest indication of a person’s
    subtest performance.
      Example: Standard score is 8 they are considered
       average and approximately half (49.50%) of the
       population is average
         Standard Score   Description     % of Age Included
         17-20            Very Superior   2.27
         15-16            Superior        6.86
         13-14            Above Average   16.12
         8-12             Average         49.50
         6-7              Below Average   16.12
         4-5              Poor            6.86
         1-3              Very Poor       2.27
   The Reading Comprehension Quotient
    (RCQ):combination of General Vocabulary,
    Syntactic Similarities, Paragraph Reading, and
    Sentence Sequencing
    Most reliable, valid, and useful measure of
    reading comprehension
         Quotient    Description     % Age Included
         >130        Very Superior   2.27
         121-130     Superior        6.86
         111-120     Above Average   16.12
         90-110      Average         49.50
         80-89       Below Average   16.12
         70-79       Poor            6.86
         < 70        Very Poor       2.27
Torc 3 final
Torc 3 final
Torc 3 final
1.   All subtest scores fall in a fairly narrow range
     varying no more than 3 to 5 standard score
     points. This means that the reader is
     consistent in their reading competence.
2.   Readers perform higher on reading
     comprehension score subtests than on one or
     more of the diagnostic supplements.
3.   A reader performs significantly lower on one of
     the reading comprehension core subtests.
4.   A reader is inconsistent across the subtests.
   Reading comprehension is a complex mental
    ability
    TORC-3 subtests were correlated with the
    total scores of two intelligence tests
    ◦ Short-Form Test of Academic Aptitude
    ◦ Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised
   The previous TORC test received negative
    criticism because it failed to describe the
    characteristics of the normative sample in
    regards to ethnicity, race and disabling
    conditions. These issues were corrected in
    the TORC-3

More Related Content

PPT
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
PPTX
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
PPTX
Types of test questions
PPT
Guidelines in writing items for noncognitive measures
PPTX
Type of Test
PPT
Essay type tests
PPTX
Objective test
PPTX
Rc for student_enhance_learning_-_moore
TORC-3 Test of Reading Comprehension- Third Edition
Objective type tests items - Merits and Demerits || merits and Demerits of ob...
Types of test questions
Guidelines in writing items for noncognitive measures
Type of Test
Essay type tests
Objective test
Rc for student_enhance_learning_-_moore

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Rc for student_enhance_learning
PPTX
Constructing Objective and Essay Type Test
PPTX
Ravens Progressive Matrices
PPTX
Objective type test
PPTX
Constructing Objective and Subjective Test
PPTX
Essay Test
DOCX
Subjective test
PPT
Item Analysis, Design and Test Formats
DOCX
Pros and Cons of Multiple Choice Question in Language Testing
ODP
Short Answer Presentation
PPTX
Matching type and supply type items
PDF
Objective Type Tests: Completion and Short - Answer Items
PPT
Test construction 2
PPTX
Multiple choice-questions
PDF
Language Testing :kinds of tests
PPTX
Matching type
PPT
Objective Testing (E Assessment Question)
PPTX
Essay Type Test
PPTX
Testing for Language Teachers
Rc for student_enhance_learning
Constructing Objective and Essay Type Test
Ravens Progressive Matrices
Objective type test
Constructing Objective and Subjective Test
Essay Test
Subjective test
Item Analysis, Design and Test Formats
Pros and Cons of Multiple Choice Question in Language Testing
Short Answer Presentation
Matching type and supply type items
Objective Type Tests: Completion and Short - Answer Items
Test construction 2
Multiple choice-questions
Language Testing :kinds of tests
Matching type
Objective Testing (E Assessment Question)
Essay Type Test
Testing for Language Teachers
Ad

Similar to Torc 3 final (20)

PPTX
TerraNova
PPT
2 marking
DOCX
Learning resources note to access this module’s required libra
PPTX
Tools To Assess The Quality Of The Curriculum
PPT
Chapter 6
PPTX
September 8 2016 Reading League Presentation
PPT
Analyzing-Test-items-of-assessmentsg.ppt
PPTX
Quantitative analysis
PDF
INTERPRETING TEST SCORES ............................
PPTX
CBA and Graphing
DOCX
CECS RC002 Research MethodologiesShort-Answer Response Assess.docx
DOCX
CECS RC002 Research MethodologiesShort-Answer Response Assess.docx
PPTX
Interpretation of test Scores
PPTX
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON MODULAR DISTANCE LEARNING.1.1.pptx
PPS
Ccss smarter balanced_assessments
PPTX
Validity ppt1
DOCX
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the r
PPTX
Standardized assessments
PPT
Designing Common Core Assessments LILAC 2013
PPTX
GRE Presentation
TerraNova
2 marking
Learning resources note to access this module’s required libra
Tools To Assess The Quality Of The Curriculum
Chapter 6
September 8 2016 Reading League Presentation
Analyzing-Test-items-of-assessmentsg.ppt
Quantitative analysis
INTERPRETING TEST SCORES ............................
CBA and Graphing
CECS RC002 Research MethodologiesShort-Answer Response Assess.docx
CECS RC002 Research MethodologiesShort-Answer Response Assess.docx
Interpretation of test Scores
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON MODULAR DISTANCE LEARNING.1.1.pptx
Ccss smarter balanced_assessments
Validity ppt1
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the r
Standardized assessments
Designing Common Core Assessments LILAC 2013
GRE Presentation
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PPTX
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
PPTX
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
PDF
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
PPTX
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
UV-Visible spectroscopy..pptx UV-Visible Spectroscopy – Electronic Transition...
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
SOIL: Factor, Horizon, Process, Classification, Degradation, Conservation
1st Inaugural Professorial Lecture held on 19th February 2020 (Governance and...
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
GENETICS IN BIOLOGY IN SECONDARY LEVEL FORM 3
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
Radiologic_Anatomy_of_the_Brachial_plexus [final].pptx
advance database management system book.pdf
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf

Torc 3 final

  • 1. Test of Reading Comprehension By: Sami Napier & Sabrina Richardson
  • 2. To identify students whose scores are significantly below those of their peers and who might need interventions designed to improve reading comprehension  To determine areas of relative strength and weakness across reading comprehension abilities  To document overall progress in reading development as a consequences of interventions programs  To serve as a measure for research efforts designed to investigate reading comprehension
  • 3. Ages, 0-7 and 11-17  Able to understand directions of subtests  Able to formulate the necessary responses  Able to read English
  • 4. No time limits  The entire test varies from 30 minutes to 90 minutes  The average time being an hour  Each subtest generally takes 5-15 minutes
  • 7. Shorten testing time  Avoid giving readers items that are too difficult
  • 8. Purpose: to measure the reader’s understanding of vocabulary that is related to a general concept  Description: 25 vocabulary questions  Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any five-item sequence have been answered incorrectly
  • 10. Purpose: to measure the reader’s understanding of meaningfully similar but syntactically different sentence structures  Description: 20 questions  Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any five-item sequence have been answered incorrectly
  • 12. Purpose: ability to answer questions related to the paragraph  Description: 6 paragraphs with 5 questions each  The first question requires the student to choose the best title that conveys the overall theme  The second and fifth questions recall story details  The third question makes an inference  The fourth question makes a negative inference  Ceiling: reached when two items or more questions for any story are answered incorrectly
  • 14. Purpose: measure the ability to order sentences into a paragraph  Description: 10 test questions  Consisting of 5 randomly ordered sentences and the reader has to put them in the correct order to form a paragraph  Ceiling: reached when any two items in a row have a score of 3 or lower
  • 16. Purpose: understanding of mathematics vocabulary  Description: 25 test questions  Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any five-item sequence have been answered incorrectly
  • 18. Purpose: understand social studies vocabulary  Description: 25 test questions  Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any five-item sequence have been answered incorrectly
  • 20. Purpose: understanding of science vocabulary  Description: 25 test questions  Ceiling: reached when three (3) items in any five-item sequence have been answered incorrectly
  • 22. Purpose: measures understanding of written directions commonly found in schoolwork  Description: 25 test questions  Consist of a printed command that the student has to carry out on the answer sheet  Ceiling: no ceiling, all items should be accepted
  • 24. Raw Scores: total number of points correct for each subtest  Grade Equivalent: Indicates the reading comprehension grade level that corresponds to the raw score made by the student  Age Equivalent: Indicates the age level that corresponds to the raw score made by the student  Percentiles: Represent a value on a scale of 100 that indicates the percentage of the distribution that is equal or below the value.  Example: 90% of a 12 year old indicates that 90 % of the sample at that age scored at or below the raw score.
  • 25. Subtest Standard Scores: These scores provide the clearest indication of a person’s subtest performance.  Example: Standard score is 8 they are considered average and approximately half (49.50%) of the population is average Standard Score Description % of Age Included 17-20 Very Superior 2.27 15-16 Superior 6.86 13-14 Above Average 16.12 8-12 Average 49.50 6-7 Below Average 16.12 4-5 Poor 6.86 1-3 Very Poor 2.27
  • 26. The Reading Comprehension Quotient (RCQ):combination of General Vocabulary, Syntactic Similarities, Paragraph Reading, and Sentence Sequencing  Most reliable, valid, and useful measure of reading comprehension Quotient Description % Age Included >130 Very Superior 2.27 121-130 Superior 6.86 111-120 Above Average 16.12 90-110 Average 49.50 80-89 Below Average 16.12 70-79 Poor 6.86 < 70 Very Poor 2.27
  • 30. 1. All subtest scores fall in a fairly narrow range varying no more than 3 to 5 standard score points. This means that the reader is consistent in their reading competence. 2. Readers perform higher on reading comprehension score subtests than on one or more of the diagnostic supplements. 3. A reader performs significantly lower on one of the reading comprehension core subtests. 4. A reader is inconsistent across the subtests.
  • 31. Reading comprehension is a complex mental ability  TORC-3 subtests were correlated with the total scores of two intelligence tests ◦ Short-Form Test of Academic Aptitude ◦ Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised
  • 32. The previous TORC test received negative criticism because it failed to describe the characteristics of the normative sample in regards to ethnicity, race and disabling conditions. These issues were corrected in the TORC-3

Editor's Notes

  • #31: The torc-3 is a reading comprehension test.  Fairly flat profile- All subtest scores fall in a fairly narrow range varying no more than 3 to 5 standard score points. This means that the reader is consistent in their reading competence. It can indicate above-average, average, or below-average reading ability. Readers perform higher on reading comprehension score subtests than on one or more of the diagnostic supplements. This usually means they have not been taught or benefited from instruction in social studies, science, or mathematics. The third pattern occurs occasionally. A reader performs significantly lower on one of the reading comprehension core subtests. A reading is inconsistent across the subtests.