2
Most read
11
Most read
21
Most read
TRS 398
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR HEAVY
ION BEAMS
This Code of Practice is based on a
calibration factor in terms of absorbed dose
to water of an ionization chamber in a
reference beam which is taken to be 60Co
gamma rays.
 The Code of Practice applies to heavy
ion beams with atomic numbers between
2(He) and 18(Ar) which have ranges of 2–
30 g/cm2 in water.
 The depth dose distribution of a mono
energetic heavy ion beam in water is shown
in figure
Introduction
For clinical applications of heavy ion beams
we have to generate ‘spread-out Bragg peaks
‘(SOBP) in order to include the complete
target volume inside the SOBP.
 In clinical applications it is common to use
a biological effective dose instead of a physical
dose (absorbed dose to water) because of the
uniformity in its dose distributions.
 The difference between the two kinds of
distributions can be compared from the figures
. In the physical dose distribution we can see a
lack of uniformity in the SOBP.
 The use of a biological effective dose makes
it possible to compare results obtained with
conventional radiotherapy to those using heavy
ion radiotherapy.
 Unlike the clinical applications ,the dosimetry of heavy ion is carried out by
determination of the physical dose using an ionization chamber calibrated in terms
of absorbed dose to water, ND,w,Qo.
 The goal behind this approach is to achieve international consistency in
dosimetry by adopting the same formalism and procedures for all the radiotherapy
beams used throughout the world.
Unfortunately, Task Group 20 in 1984 by the Association of American Physicists
in Medicine is the only protocol available regarding dosimetry recommendations .
Thus there is a need for a new protocol which will be able to establish a global
consistency in the determination of absorbed dose to water with heavy ions and is
common to dosimetry protocols.
 For an accurate determination of absorbed dose using an ionization chamber, we
need to know the energy spectra of the incident heavy ion beam, the projectile
fragments as well as that of the target fragmented nuclei.
Dosimetry equipments
Ionization chambers
Cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers are recommended for use as
reference instruments in clinical heavy ion beams.
 cylindrical ionization chambers are preferred for reference dosimetry for SOBP
width ≥ 2.0 g/cm2 and plane-parallel chambers are preferred for SOBP width < 2.0
g/cm2.
The reason for this preferences is the higher combined standard uncertainty on
Dw,Q for plane-parallel ionization chambers due to their higher uncertainty for pwall
in the 60Co reference beam quality.
In the case of cylindrical chambers ,graphite walled are preferred to plastic
walled chambers because of their better long term stability and smaller chamber to
chamber variations.
 Since the depth dose distribution in the SOBP for heavy ion beams is not flat and
the slope depends on the width of the SOBP , measurement of an effective point of
the chamber, Peff, is important.
 The reference point of the cylindrical chamber should be positioned at a distance
0.75 rcyl deeper than the point of interest in the phantom, where rcyl is the inner
radius of the chamber.
For plane-parallel ionization chambers, the reference point is taken to be on the
inner surface of the entrance window, at the centre of the window. This point is
positioned at the point of interest in the phantom.
The cavity diameter of the plane-parallel ionization chamber or the cavity length
of the cylindrical ionization chamber should not be larger than approximately half
the reference field size.
Phantoms and chamber sleeves
 Water is recommended as the reference medium for measurements of absorbed
dose.
The extension of phantom should be at least 5 cm beyond all four sides of the
field size at the depth of measurement and should extend to at least 5 g/cm2
beyond the maximum depth of measurement.
In horizontal beams, phantom should have plastic window with a thickness twin
between 0.2 and 0.5 cm. In the case of non-waterproof chambers, a waterproofing
sleeve made of PMMA, with a thickness than 1.0 mm have to be used.
To provide equilibrium air pressure in the chamber ,the air gap between the
chamber wall and the waterproofing sleeve should be within (0.1–0.3 mm).
If it is possible, the same waterproofing sleeve that was used for calibration of user
chamber should also be used for reference dosimetry. Otherwise another sleeve of
the same material and of similar thickness should be used.
Use of plastic phantoms for reference dosimetry in heavy ion beams is not
recommended.
 One of the reason for this is difficulty in availability of water to plastic fluence
correction factors, hpl, and other reason is difference in the fluence of heavy ions
including fragmented particles in a plastic phantom and that in a water phantom.
 However, for routine quality assurance measurements plastic phantoms can be
used, provided a transfer factor between plastic and water has been established.
BEAM QUALITY SPECIFICATION
Unavailability of both experimental and theoretical data regarding spectral
distributions of heavy ion beams makes beam quality specification more
impractical.
 The current practice for characterizing a heavy ion beam is to use the atomic
number, mass number, energy of the incident heavy ion beam, width of SOBP and
range.
DETERMINATION OF ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER
From the spread out Bragg peak of a heavy ion figure we have seen that
The depth dose distribution is not flat, and the dose at the distal end of the SOBP
is smaller than that at the proximal part.
The slope near the centre of a broad SOBP is rather small whereas that of a
narrow SOBP is steep.
 The reference depth for calibration should be taken at the centre of the SOBP, at
the centre of the target volume.
Reference conditions for the determination of absorbed dose to water are given as
Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion
Determination of absorbed dose under reference conditions
The absorbed dose to water at the reference depth zref in water in a heavy ion beam
of quality Q and in the absence of the chamber is given by
where MQ is the meter reading of the dosimeter in accordance with the
reference conditions corrected for the influence quantities like
temperature and pressure, electrometer calibration, polarity effect
and ion recombination etc
ND,w,Qo is the calibration factor in terms of absorbed dose to water for the
dosimeter at the reference quality Qo.
kQ,Qo is a chamber specific factor which corrects for differences between
the reference beam quality Qo and the actual beam quality being
used, Q
Recombination correction in heavy ion beams
Dose rate will be very high when beams are generated by pulsed scanning
techniques and so recombination effects must be taken into account.
The correction factor for general (Volume) recombination is obtained
experimentally by the two voltage method.
 When general recombination is negligible, initial recombination should be taken
into account for heavy ion beams, especially when the dose is measured using
plane-parallel ionization chambers.
 The collected ionization current should be fitted by the linear relation
l/icol = 1/i∞ + b/V
where V is the polarizing voltage applied to the chamber. The correction factor is
given by ks
ini = i∞ /icol.
Part of worksheet regarding calculation for Initial ion recombination
Values of kQ,Qo
 Beam quality specifications are not currently used for the dosimetry of heavy-ion
beams and so kQ values depend only on the chamber type used.
 Experimental values of the factor kQ,Qo are not readily available and, therefore, in
this report only theoretical values will be used.
The correction factor is defined as.
 Since there is no primary standard of absorbed dose to water for heavy ion
beams is available, all values for kQ,Qo given in this Code of Practice are derived by
calculation and are based on 60Co gamma radiation as the reference beam quality Qo
at 60Co.
 There is no information available on perturbation factors for ion chambers in
heavy ion beams, and so is assumed as unity.
The stopping-power ratios and W values for heavy ion beams are taken to be
independent of the beam quality, because of lack of experimental data.
The contribution of fragmented nuclei to stopping-power ratios and W values
are also assumed to be negligible.
 Constant values of the stopping-power ratio and W value are therefore
adopted here for all heavy ion beams — these are 1.130 and 34.50 eV,
respectively.
 As the stopping power ratio sw,air of heavy ions is so close to that of 60Co, the
kQ values for heavy ions are dominated by the ratio of Wair values and the
chamber specific perturbation factors
Values of kQ for various cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers
in common use are given. Some of the chambers listed in this table fail to
meet some of the minimum requirements .However, they have been
included because of their current clinical use.
Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion
Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion
Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion
Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion
Thank you

More Related Content

PPTX
TRS 398 (Technical Report Series)
PPTX
Isodose lines
PPTX
Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy and Dosimetry
PPTX
EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS THERAPY (PART 2)
PDF
Dosimetry
PPTX
Quality assurance of treatment planning system by Rahim Gohar
PPTX
Basics And Physics of Brachytherapy
TRS 398 (Technical Report Series)
Isodose lines
Quality Assurance in Radiotherapy and Dosimetry
EXTERNAL PHOTON BEAMS THERAPY (PART 2)
Dosimetry
Quality assurance of treatment planning system by Rahim Gohar
Basics And Physics of Brachytherapy

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Beam modification in radiotherapy
PDF
Commissioning of Truebeam LINAC
PDF
Tomotherapy
PPT
Dosimetric calculations
PDF
Icru 71 electrons
PDF
Dosimetric Evaluation of High Energy Electron Beams Applied in Radiotherapy
PPTX
Brachytherapy permanent seed implant
PPTX
ELECTRON BEAM THERAPY
PPTX
Beam modifying devices
PPTX
Carbon ion therapy
PPTX
Topic -Analysis of Patients specific Quality Assurance of IMRT/VMAT
PPTX
RADIOTHERAPY CALCULATION
PDF
Session 3 measure beam profile rt
PPTX
Brachytherapy dosimetry
PPTX
Intro of co 60 unit
PPTX
Basics of linear quadratic model
PPTX
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
PDF
history of VMAT
PPTX
Icrp60
Beam modification in radiotherapy
Commissioning of Truebeam LINAC
Tomotherapy
Dosimetric calculations
Icru 71 electrons
Dosimetric Evaluation of High Energy Electron Beams Applied in Radiotherapy
Brachytherapy permanent seed implant
ELECTRON BEAM THERAPY
Beam modifying devices
Carbon ion therapy
Topic -Analysis of Patients specific Quality Assurance of IMRT/VMAT
RADIOTHERAPY CALCULATION
Session 3 measure beam profile rt
Brachytherapy dosimetry
Intro of co 60 unit
Basics of linear quadratic model
Particle beam – proton,neutron & heavy ion therapy
history of VMAT
Icrp60
Ad

Viewers also liked (9)

PPTX
TRS 398 code of practice for low KV xrays
PPT
Dosis absorbida
PDF
218 2 - radioterapia
PPT
Mejora de la seguridad en radioterapia PhD Sandra Guzman 2015
PPT
Clase Villareal
PPTX
Radioterapia
PPT
Proteccion radiologica en radioterapia
PDF
CONTROL DE CALIDAD DE EQUIPOS DE DOSIMETRIA
PPT
Fundamentos De Radioterapia
TRS 398 code of practice for low KV xrays
Dosis absorbida
218 2 - radioterapia
Mejora de la seguridad en radioterapia PhD Sandra Guzman 2015
Clase Villareal
Radioterapia
Proteccion radiologica en radioterapia
CONTROL DE CALIDAD DE EQUIPOS DE DOSIMETRIA
Fundamentos De Radioterapia
Ad

Similar to Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion (20)

PPTX
Basics of Electron Dosimetry presentation.pptx
PPTX
IAEA_TRS technicaL REPOrt series-398 Co-60 .pptx
PPTX
Out put calibration of co60
PDF
PVSC2015 final paper
PPT
Lv bv v cvvc vc vcvccvvcvc xfdsefwefwe21.ppt
PDF
Brent Godau Chem 499 Thesis
PDF
Analysis and Design of Lead Salt PbSe/PbSrSe Single Quantum Well In the Infra...
PDF
INTERNSHIP-REPORT-CHIRAS
PPT
Dosimetry 2
PDF
CE8512- WATER & WASTE WATER ANALYSIS LAB MANUVAL
PPTX
TG-51 Ramesh presentation
PPTX
Well logs
PDF
The International Journal of Engineering and Science
PDF
CHEME 5650 FINAL REPORT rc695
PPTX
Mafuz ppt
PDF
EAGE 2013
PPTX
Dosimetry concepts and dosimeters
PPT
Study of semiconductor with positron
Basics of Electron Dosimetry presentation.pptx
IAEA_TRS technicaL REPOrt series-398 Co-60 .pptx
Out put calibration of co60
PVSC2015 final paper
Lv bv v cvvc vc vcvccvvcvc xfdsefwefwe21.ppt
Brent Godau Chem 499 Thesis
Analysis and Design of Lead Salt PbSe/PbSrSe Single Quantum Well In the Infra...
INTERNSHIP-REPORT-CHIRAS
Dosimetry 2
CE8512- WATER & WASTE WATER ANALYSIS LAB MANUVAL
TG-51 Ramesh presentation
Well logs
The International Journal of Engineering and Science
CHEME 5650 FINAL REPORT rc695
Mafuz ppt
EAGE 2013
Dosimetry concepts and dosimeters
Study of semiconductor with positron

Recently uploaded (20)

PPT
Computional quantum chemistry study .ppt
PPT
Biochemestry- PPT ON Protein,Nitrogenous constituents of Urine, Blood, their ...
PPTX
BODY FLUIDS AND CIRCULATION class 11 .pptx
PPT
Mutation in dna of bacteria and repairss
PDF
Science Form five needed shit SCIENEce so
PPTX
PMR- PPT.pptx for students and doctors tt
PPTX
GREEN FIELDS SCHOOL PPT ON HOLIDAY HOMEWORK
PPTX
Microbes in human welfare class 12 .pptx
PDF
Warm, water-depleted rocky exoplanets with surfaceionic liquids: A proposed c...
PDF
S2 SOIL BY TR. OKION.pdf based on the new lower secondary curriculum
PDF
Social preventive and pharmacy. Pdf
PDF
Unit 5 Preparations, Reactions, Properties and Isomersim of Organic Compounds...
PDF
CHAPTER 3 Cell Structures and Their Functions Lecture Outline.pdf
PPT
1. INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGY.pptx for community medicine
PDF
GROUP 2 ORIGINAL PPT. pdf Hhfiwhwifhww0ojuwoadwsfjofjwsofjw
PDF
Worlds Next Door: A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ↵ ...
PPT
Heredity-grade-9 Heredity-grade-9. Heredity-grade-9.
PPTX
Presentation1 INTRODUCTION TO ENZYMES.pptx
PDF
Wound infection.pdfWound infection.pdf123
PPTX
endocrine - management of adrenal incidentaloma.pptx
Computional quantum chemistry study .ppt
Biochemestry- PPT ON Protein,Nitrogenous constituents of Urine, Blood, their ...
BODY FLUIDS AND CIRCULATION class 11 .pptx
Mutation in dna of bacteria and repairss
Science Form five needed shit SCIENEce so
PMR- PPT.pptx for students and doctors tt
GREEN FIELDS SCHOOL PPT ON HOLIDAY HOMEWORK
Microbes in human welfare class 12 .pptx
Warm, water-depleted rocky exoplanets with surfaceionic liquids: A proposed c...
S2 SOIL BY TR. OKION.pdf based on the new lower secondary curriculum
Social preventive and pharmacy. Pdf
Unit 5 Preparations, Reactions, Properties and Isomersim of Organic Compounds...
CHAPTER 3 Cell Structures and Their Functions Lecture Outline.pdf
1. INTRODUCTION TO EPIDEMIOLOGY.pptx for community medicine
GROUP 2 ORIGINAL PPT. pdf Hhfiwhwifhww0ojuwoadwsfjofjwsofjw
Worlds Next Door: A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of ↵ ...
Heredity-grade-9 Heredity-grade-9. Heredity-grade-9.
Presentation1 INTRODUCTION TO ENZYMES.pptx
Wound infection.pdfWound infection.pdf123
endocrine - management of adrenal incidentaloma.pptx

Trs 398 code of practice for heavy ion

  • 1. TRS 398 CODE OF PRACTICE FOR HEAVY ION BEAMS
  • 2. This Code of Practice is based on a calibration factor in terms of absorbed dose to water of an ionization chamber in a reference beam which is taken to be 60Co gamma rays.  The Code of Practice applies to heavy ion beams with atomic numbers between 2(He) and 18(Ar) which have ranges of 2– 30 g/cm2 in water.  The depth dose distribution of a mono energetic heavy ion beam in water is shown in figure Introduction
  • 3. For clinical applications of heavy ion beams we have to generate ‘spread-out Bragg peaks ‘(SOBP) in order to include the complete target volume inside the SOBP.  In clinical applications it is common to use a biological effective dose instead of a physical dose (absorbed dose to water) because of the uniformity in its dose distributions.  The difference between the two kinds of distributions can be compared from the figures . In the physical dose distribution we can see a lack of uniformity in the SOBP.  The use of a biological effective dose makes it possible to compare results obtained with conventional radiotherapy to those using heavy ion radiotherapy.
  • 4.  Unlike the clinical applications ,the dosimetry of heavy ion is carried out by determination of the physical dose using an ionization chamber calibrated in terms of absorbed dose to water, ND,w,Qo.  The goal behind this approach is to achieve international consistency in dosimetry by adopting the same formalism and procedures for all the radiotherapy beams used throughout the world. Unfortunately, Task Group 20 in 1984 by the Association of American Physicists in Medicine is the only protocol available regarding dosimetry recommendations . Thus there is a need for a new protocol which will be able to establish a global consistency in the determination of absorbed dose to water with heavy ions and is common to dosimetry protocols.  For an accurate determination of absorbed dose using an ionization chamber, we need to know the energy spectra of the incident heavy ion beam, the projectile fragments as well as that of the target fragmented nuclei.
  • 5. Dosimetry equipments Ionization chambers Cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers are recommended for use as reference instruments in clinical heavy ion beams.  cylindrical ionization chambers are preferred for reference dosimetry for SOBP width ≥ 2.0 g/cm2 and plane-parallel chambers are preferred for SOBP width < 2.0 g/cm2. The reason for this preferences is the higher combined standard uncertainty on Dw,Q for plane-parallel ionization chambers due to their higher uncertainty for pwall in the 60Co reference beam quality. In the case of cylindrical chambers ,graphite walled are preferred to plastic walled chambers because of their better long term stability and smaller chamber to chamber variations.
  • 6.  Since the depth dose distribution in the SOBP for heavy ion beams is not flat and the slope depends on the width of the SOBP , measurement of an effective point of the chamber, Peff, is important.  The reference point of the cylindrical chamber should be positioned at a distance 0.75 rcyl deeper than the point of interest in the phantom, where rcyl is the inner radius of the chamber. For plane-parallel ionization chambers, the reference point is taken to be on the inner surface of the entrance window, at the centre of the window. This point is positioned at the point of interest in the phantom. The cavity diameter of the plane-parallel ionization chamber or the cavity length of the cylindrical ionization chamber should not be larger than approximately half the reference field size.
  • 7. Phantoms and chamber sleeves  Water is recommended as the reference medium for measurements of absorbed dose. The extension of phantom should be at least 5 cm beyond all four sides of the field size at the depth of measurement and should extend to at least 5 g/cm2 beyond the maximum depth of measurement. In horizontal beams, phantom should have plastic window with a thickness twin between 0.2 and 0.5 cm. In the case of non-waterproof chambers, a waterproofing sleeve made of PMMA, with a thickness than 1.0 mm have to be used. To provide equilibrium air pressure in the chamber ,the air gap between the chamber wall and the waterproofing sleeve should be within (0.1–0.3 mm).
  • 8. If it is possible, the same waterproofing sleeve that was used for calibration of user chamber should also be used for reference dosimetry. Otherwise another sleeve of the same material and of similar thickness should be used. Use of plastic phantoms for reference dosimetry in heavy ion beams is not recommended.  One of the reason for this is difficulty in availability of water to plastic fluence correction factors, hpl, and other reason is difference in the fluence of heavy ions including fragmented particles in a plastic phantom and that in a water phantom.  However, for routine quality assurance measurements plastic phantoms can be used, provided a transfer factor between plastic and water has been established.
  • 9. BEAM QUALITY SPECIFICATION Unavailability of both experimental and theoretical data regarding spectral distributions of heavy ion beams makes beam quality specification more impractical.  The current practice for characterizing a heavy ion beam is to use the atomic number, mass number, energy of the incident heavy ion beam, width of SOBP and range. DETERMINATION OF ABSORBED DOSE TO WATER From the spread out Bragg peak of a heavy ion figure we have seen that The depth dose distribution is not flat, and the dose at the distal end of the SOBP is smaller than that at the proximal part. The slope near the centre of a broad SOBP is rather small whereas that of a narrow SOBP is steep.  The reference depth for calibration should be taken at the centre of the SOBP, at the centre of the target volume. Reference conditions for the determination of absorbed dose to water are given as
  • 11. Determination of absorbed dose under reference conditions The absorbed dose to water at the reference depth zref in water in a heavy ion beam of quality Q and in the absence of the chamber is given by where MQ is the meter reading of the dosimeter in accordance with the reference conditions corrected for the influence quantities like temperature and pressure, electrometer calibration, polarity effect and ion recombination etc ND,w,Qo is the calibration factor in terms of absorbed dose to water for the dosimeter at the reference quality Qo. kQ,Qo is a chamber specific factor which corrects for differences between the reference beam quality Qo and the actual beam quality being used, Q
  • 12. Recombination correction in heavy ion beams Dose rate will be very high when beams are generated by pulsed scanning techniques and so recombination effects must be taken into account. The correction factor for general (Volume) recombination is obtained experimentally by the two voltage method.  When general recombination is negligible, initial recombination should be taken into account for heavy ion beams, especially when the dose is measured using plane-parallel ionization chambers.  The collected ionization current should be fitted by the linear relation l/icol = 1/i∞ + b/V where V is the polarizing voltage applied to the chamber. The correction factor is given by ks ini = i∞ /icol.
  • 13. Part of worksheet regarding calculation for Initial ion recombination
  • 14. Values of kQ,Qo  Beam quality specifications are not currently used for the dosimetry of heavy-ion beams and so kQ values depend only on the chamber type used.  Experimental values of the factor kQ,Qo are not readily available and, therefore, in this report only theoretical values will be used. The correction factor is defined as.  Since there is no primary standard of absorbed dose to water for heavy ion beams is available, all values for kQ,Qo given in this Code of Practice are derived by calculation and are based on 60Co gamma radiation as the reference beam quality Qo at 60Co.
  • 15.  There is no information available on perturbation factors for ion chambers in heavy ion beams, and so is assumed as unity. The stopping-power ratios and W values for heavy ion beams are taken to be independent of the beam quality, because of lack of experimental data. The contribution of fragmented nuclei to stopping-power ratios and W values are also assumed to be negligible.  Constant values of the stopping-power ratio and W value are therefore adopted here for all heavy ion beams — these are 1.130 and 34.50 eV, respectively.  As the stopping power ratio sw,air of heavy ions is so close to that of 60Co, the kQ values for heavy ions are dominated by the ratio of Wair values and the chamber specific perturbation factors
  • 16. Values of kQ for various cylindrical and plane-parallel ionization chambers in common use are given. Some of the chambers listed in this table fail to meet some of the minimum requirements .However, they have been included because of their current clinical use.

Editor's Notes

  • #3: bcs there is a lack of primary standards for heavy ions
  • #8: Forthe commonly used plastics PMMA and clear polystyrene, the nominal values ñ PMMA = 1.19 g/cm3 and ñ polystyrene = 1.06 g/cm3 may be used for the calcula-tion of the water equivalent thickness of the window.