Unit- 2: Lecture-4 (Factor Endowment Theory)
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like2,589 views
This document provides an overview of the factor endowment theory of international trade, also known as the Heckscher-Ohlin theory. It describes the origin of the theory with economists Bertil Ohlin and Eli Heckscher. The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem predicts that countries will export goods that intensively use their relatively abundant factors of production and import goods that intensively use their relatively scarce factors. The document outlines 11 assumptions of the theory and provides an explanation of factor intensity, factor abundance, and how this impacts production possibilities frontiers in countries.
Unit- 2: Lecture-4 (Factor Endowment Theory)
- 1. Branch - MBA International Business Management DR. APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY By Dr. B. B.Tiwari Professor Department of Management Shri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges, Lucknow Unit-2: Lecture – 4 International Trade Theories: Factor Endowment Theory
- 2. Origin of the theory: Introduction•The theory was developed by the Swedish economist Bertil Ohlin (1899– 1979) on the basis of work by his teacher the Swedish economist Eli Filip Heckscher (1879–1952). •In recognition of his ideas as described in his path-breaking book, “Interregional and International Trade” (1933), For his work on the theory, Ohlin was awarded the Nobel Prize for Economics (the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel) in 1977. •Ohlin served as head of the Liberal Party in Sweden from 1944 to 1967. He was a member of the Riksdag (parliament) from 1938 to 1970 and was minister of commerce (1944–45) in Sweden’s wartime government.
- 3. The Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem Definition: A nation will export the commodity whose production requires the intensive use of the nation’s relatively abundant and cheap factor and import the commodity whose production requires the intensive use of the nation’s relatively scare and expensive factor. Or: the relatively labor-rich nation exports the relatively labor-intensive commodity and imports the relatively capital -intensive commodity. This means that Nation 1 exports X because X is the L-intensive commodity and L is relatively abundant and cheap factor in Nation 1.
- 4. Assumptions of the TheoryA. The Assumptions 1) Thereare two nations(1&2), two commodities (X&Y), twofactors of production (labor & capital). Used to illustrate the theory in a two-dimensional figure. 2) Both nations use the same technology in production. Means both nations have access to and use the same general production techniques. 3) Commodity X is labor intensive and Y is capital intensive in both nations. Means the labor-capital ratio (L/K) is higher for X than Y in both nations at the same relative factor prices.
- 5. 4) Both commodities are produced under constant returns to scale in both nations. Means that increasing the amount of L and K will increase output in the same proportion 5) There is incomplete specialization in production in both nations. Means that even with free trade both nations continue to produce both commodities. This implies neither nation is very small. 6) Tastes are equal in both nations. Cont…. .
- 6. Cont…. .7) There is perfect competition in both commodities and factor markets in both nations. •Means that producers, consumers, and traders of X&Y in both nations are each too small to affect prices of commodities. Also, in the L-R commodity prices equal their costs, leaving no economic profit. 8) There is perfect factor mobility within each nation but no international factor mobility. •Means K&L are free to move from areas and industries of lower earnings to those of higher earnings until earnings are the same in all areas, uses and industries of the nation. International differences in earnings persist due to zero international factor mobility in the absence of international trade.
- 7. 9) There are no transportation costs, tariffs, or other obstructions to the free flow of international trade. Means specialization in production proceeds until relative (and absolute) commodity prices are the same in both nations with trade. If transportation costs and tariffs were allowed, specialization would proceed only until prices differed by no more than the costs and tariffs on each until of the commodity traded. 10)All resources are fully employed in both nations. Means there are no unemployed resources in either nation. 11) International trade between the two nations is balanced. Means that the total value of each nation’s exports equals the Cont…. .
- 8. Comment On the basis of these assumes, the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem predicted that the capital surplus country specializes in the production and exports of capital intensive goods, and the labor surplus country specialize in the production and exports of labor intensive goods.
- 9. Factor Intensity, Factor Abundance, and the Shape of the Production Frontier (PF)Factor Intensity: In a world of 2 commodities and 2 factors, Y is capital intensive if its (K/L) is greater than (K/L) of X. If production of Y requires 2K and 2L, then K/L=1. If production of X requires 1K and 4L, then K/L=1/4. We say that Y is K intensive and X is L intensive. Measuring K and L intensity depends on K/L rather than the absolute amount of K and L. In the figure (On next slide), Nation 1 can produce 1Y using 2K- 2L, and 2Y using 4K-4L. Thus, K/L=1, this gives the slope of Y in Nation 1.
- 10. FIGURE : Factor Intensities for Commodities X and Y in Nations 1 and 2. Nation 1 can produce 1X using 1K-4L, and 2X using 2K-8L. Thus, K/L=1/4, this gives the slope of the ray of X in Nation 1. In Nation 2, K/L=4 for Y and 1 for X.
- 11. Explanation: Therefore, Y is the K-intensive commodity, and X is the L- intensive in Nation 2 also. This is shown by the fact that the ray from the origin for good Y is steeper than that of X in both nations. Even though Y is K-intensive relative to X in both nations, Nation 2 uses a higher K/L than Nation 1. For Y, K/L=4 in Nation 2 but K/L=1 in Nation 1. For X, K/L=1 in Nation 2 but K/L=1/4 in Nation 1.
- 12. Factor Abundance and the Shape of the Production Frontier Since Nation 2 is K-abundant and Y is K-intensive, Nation 2 can produce relatively more of Y than Nation 1. Since Nation 1 is L-abundant and X is L-intensive, Nation 1 can produce relatively more of X than Nation 2. This gives a production frontier for Nation 1 that is relatively flatter and wider that that of Nation 2. The Shape of the Production Frontiers of Nation 1 and Nation 2.
- 13. THANK YOU