SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Using Clickers  in the Classroom Dr. Russell James III Texas Tech University
Clickers are electronic student response systems usually allowing for A,B,C,D,E, or number responses
Clickers v. Other response systems Everyone participates, not just the overly vocal Harder to just vote with majority than raising hands A pre-technology version gives students spiral flipbooks to hold up with pages for A, B, C, D, & E. C
OK, so what can I do with them?
How many semesters of calculus have you had? How many countries outside North America have you visited? Are undecided on your major? Quickly gathering information
In class choice experiments
Experiment Time! One of you will be picked to receive one of the choices you selected.  You can receive $1.00 (cash) on the second to last day of this class. You can receive $1.05 (cash) on the last day of this class.
Intervening slides followed by… Pick one You can receive $1.00 (cash) right now. You can receive $1.05 (cash) during the next meeting of this class.
Class choices Voted to take the $1 on the next to last day of class (instead of $1.05 on the last day)? Fall ‘09: 32.2% (n=87) Spring ‘10:  35.8% (n=110) Voted to take $1 now (instead of $1.05 at the next class)? Fall ‘09: 66.3% (n=86) Spring ’10: 69.4% (n=111) Why the change?  Note: Next class in 2 days.  5% difference.  (365 days/2 days) X 5%  ≈   912%  APR
 
Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease which is expected to kill 600 people.  Choose a program to address the problem. A: 200 people will be saved B: 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved.
Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease which is expected to kill 600 people.  Choose a program to address the problem. A: 200 people will be saved B: 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved. Show Class Clicker Results
Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease which is expected to kill 600 people.  Choose a program to address the problem. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.  Science, 211,  453-458. 72% A: 200 people will be saved B: 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved. 28% Show Published Study Results
 
Show Class Clicker Results
22% 78% Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.  Science, 211,  453-458. Show Published Study Results
 
2 nd  Option B: 600 expected to die… 1/3 chance that nobody will die.  2/3 chance that 600 people will die. 1 st  Option B: 600 expected to die… 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved.  2/3 chance that no people will be saved. 78% 28% Reframing the option as a loss changed the choices = Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.  Science, 211,  453-458. ≠ =
Recall questions:  Beginning of class Who has read the assigned material?
Recall questions: Middle of class Rewards attendance  and  attentiveness Immediate instructor feedback Good responses -> Move on Poor responses -> Discuss more
Recall question with poor responses “ Try to convince the people sitting around you that your answer is right.  Then, answer the  question again.”
Recall questions  End of class Instructor feedback for next lecture (no need to change “on the fly”) Multiple questions on screen possible with clickers in exam mode
Predict the outcome of an experiment
Describe an  experiment Group A, B, & C female Asian-American college students were given a questionnaire  followed by a math test .  A: Gender-related questionnaire Ex: 3 reasons why you might prefer a single-sex dorm B: Ethnicity-related questionnaire  Ex: did grandparents speak languages other than English? C: Neutral questionnaire
Students predict experiment outcome Did drawing attention to issues of race or gender affect subsequent math scores? No effect for either Both gender focus and race focus lowered scores Both gender focus and race focus raised scores Gender focus raised scores; Race focus lowered scores Gender focus lowered scores; Race focus raised scores
Show student predictions Did drawing attention to issues of race or gender affect subsequent math scores? No effect for either Both gender focus and race focus lowered scores Both gender focus and race focus raised scores Gender focus raised scores; Race focus lowered scores Gender focus lowered scores; Race focus raised scores
Show experiment results and discuss M. Shih (Harvard), T. Pittinsky (Harvard), & N. Ambady (Harvard), 1999, Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance.  Psychological Science,  10(1), 80-83.
Click when finished with a task
Vote Before and after a debate/discussion Vote on best student created videos
Rate the class Instead of waiting until end of the semester evaluations, end every class with the same evaluation question Track trends, lecture topics, methodologies
Collect student opinions to begin a discussion
Advanced applications When you want to try more experiments in class!
Individual student  Socratic questioning “ Tell me, John Smith, why was X a compelling choice for you?....... Sally Student, you answered Y.  Why do you feel differently than  John?”
Clicker wars: The concept Divide students into large groups, e.g. gender, junior/senior. Work in teams of 2 or 3.  One clicker per team. Winning team gets large reward.  Winning group gets modest reward. Multiple choice questions. Wrong answer = turn off clicker, your team is out. But, you can STILL help others in the larger group.
Clicker wars:  This really works! Consistently the highest rated classes of the semester. Discuss wrong answers selected (teachable moments). End of section reviews or exam reviews.
Real time tracking Some programs constantly track and display cumulative answer changes.  Use separate laptop so you can see, but students can’t.
 
Real time tracking:  Confusion meter Click A when the current topic doesn’t make sense Click B if it becomes clear later Tracks the number of students who are currently registering confusion
Real time “focus group” response meter Use “rate the class” scale with instructions to click repeatedly, every slide, or every minute. Use screen recorder software  (ex: BB Flashback, Camtasia)  to record presentation from your webcam while recording your response meter screen (picture in picture) for drilling down on what sections generated what responses
 
High stakes, low stakes, or no stakes? Giving credit for clickers
 
Correct answers only Potential problem with cheating  No multiple exam versions  Potential problem with students who have time and a half learning disability accommodations.
Hybrid Full credit if a threshold percentage of correct answers are reached. Correct answers only for pre-lecture questions. Participation only for mid-lecture questions. Clicker questions will be placed on exam.
I forgot my clicker! Allow no credit or Allow X number of missed clicker days or Allow written answers turned in at end of class
The clicker didn’t work! If clicker not indicating responses being received allow written responses at end of class (not later), but must show your clicker
Preventing false participation  “my best friend’s clicker”  Take digital photos of class Announce and use as a deterrent Match with quick writing assignment Require each student to turn in  only one   by hand   to you  at end of class. TA spies looking for multiple clickers Counting heads If head count doesn’t match clicker count, assign quick writing for matching
Slides by:  Russell James III, J.D., Ph.D., CFP® Associate Professor – Texas Tech University, College of Human Sciences, Div. of Personal Financial Planning University of Georgia – College of Family & Consumer Sciences 2009 Outstanding Teacher of the Year Feel free to use any of these slides! Any comments or questions to russell.james@ttu.edu

More Related Content

DOC
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
PDF
Clickers 1: Peer Instruction with Clickers
PPT
21st century learning k 5
PPTX
Building Great Lessons: Four simple ideas to engage and excite your students
PPTX
Fun Ways to Teach for the GED Test
DOCX
Social Psychology syllabus summer 2019
PPTX
Sxsw.backchannel
PPT
香港六合彩
PEShare.co.uk Shared Resource
Clickers 1: Peer Instruction with Clickers
21st century learning k 5
Building Great Lessons: Four simple ideas to engage and excite your students
Fun Ways to Teach for the GED Test
Social Psychology syllabus summer 2019
Sxsw.backchannel
香港六合彩

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Concretepracticefinal
PDF
CMST 100-11 Syllabus
PPTX
Writing multiple choice questions 3
PDF
The Quest for Learner Engagement
PPTX
Multiple Choice Tests
PPTX
Creating (more) effective tests and quizzes.spr.15
PPTX
Gaming your online class
PPTX
Game based learning 2011
DOCX
SAT Workshop Curriculum
DOCX
SAT Workshop Curriculum
PPTX
Tulsa: Exciting Strategies for Low Level Learners
PPTX
Best Practices for Remote Teaching
PPTX
Fun Ways to Equip Students for Critical Thinking on the GED Test
PDF
MCQ Workshop - Dr Jane Holland
PPTX
Questionnaire design
PPTX
Gaming your online course
PPT
Concrete Practice
PDF
Example exit slip prompts
PPT
Ewrt 1 a class 29
DOCX
Spring 11.2110.08.syllabus
Concretepracticefinal
CMST 100-11 Syllabus
Writing multiple choice questions 3
The Quest for Learner Engagement
Multiple Choice Tests
Creating (more) effective tests and quizzes.spr.15
Gaming your online class
Game based learning 2011
SAT Workshop Curriculum
SAT Workshop Curriculum
Tulsa: Exciting Strategies for Low Level Learners
Best Practices for Remote Teaching
Fun Ways to Equip Students for Critical Thinking on the GED Test
MCQ Workshop - Dr Jane Holland
Questionnaire design
Gaming your online course
Concrete Practice
Example exit slip prompts
Ewrt 1 a class 29
Spring 11.2110.08.syllabus
Ad

Similar to Using Clickers In The Classroom (20)

PPT
Quality Criteria Test Questions
PDF
Best practices for running peer instruction
PPT
First Lecture 2008
PPTX
How'd you do that?
PPT
Clickers 201 - Effective questions in any discipline - March 2012
PPTX
Loss Aversion & Endowment Effect
PPTX
Better Questions, Better Results!
PPTX
Math Fundamentals Tutor to
PPT
CISD Junior guidance 2011
PPT
How to create multiple choice questions
PPT
Whole class feedback_guide
PPT
HUDDAR RESEARCH TOOL. SKILL DEV D 19 B ED SPL ED.ppt
PPT
Clicker technologies as a tool to increase student engagement and motivation
PPTX
HPERS Keynote 2010
PPT
Clickers masterclass ucs_dec_2010
PPSX
"Metacognition: The Key to Teaching Students Transformative Learning Strategi...
PDF
Benchmark 1: Course syllabus sample, Naomi's
PPT
Johnson numeracy leslla2011
PPT
EngagementStrategiesHS.ppt strategy strategies
Quality Criteria Test Questions
Best practices for running peer instruction
First Lecture 2008
How'd you do that?
Clickers 201 - Effective questions in any discipline - March 2012
Loss Aversion & Endowment Effect
Better Questions, Better Results!
Math Fundamentals Tutor to
CISD Junior guidance 2011
How to create multiple choice questions
Whole class feedback_guide
HUDDAR RESEARCH TOOL. SKILL DEV D 19 B ED SPL ED.ppt
Clicker technologies as a tool to increase student engagement and motivation
HPERS Keynote 2010
Clickers masterclass ucs_dec_2010
"Metacognition: The Key to Teaching Students Transformative Learning Strategi...
Benchmark 1: Course syllabus sample, Naomi's
Johnson numeracy leslla2011
EngagementStrategiesHS.ppt strategy strategies
Ad

More from Russell James (20)

PDF
Charitable bequest fundraising: New results from 100 years of national data
PDF
Major gifts of assets in the aftermath of Covid-19
PDF
10 Strategies for Post COVID-19 fundraising in complex and major gifts
PDF
Top 10 charitable planning strategies for financial advisors 2020
PDF
The Statistics & Psychology of Baby Boomer Lifetime & Legacy Giving
PDF
Using "natural philanthropy" in fundraising
PDF
Top 10 legacy fundraising strategies from scientific research: National data ...
PDF
Natural philanthropy: How the natural origins of donor motivations drive powe...
PDF
Top 10 charitable planning strategies for financial advisors under the new ta...
PDF
Why cash is not king in fundraising: Results from 1 million nonprofit tax ret...
PDF
Top 10 charitable planning strategies updated for the new tax law
PPTX
Using donor surveys in planned giving
PPTX
The hidden code behind death-related financial decisions
PPTX
Counting Revocable Planned Gifts in Fundraising - Return from Fantasy Island
PDF
Planned Giving Words that Work Part II
PDF
Church seminar in charitable estate planning
PDF
Ponzis, Pyramids, and Bubbles: An introduction to financial fraud
PDF
Messages that encourage bequest giving to cancer research
PPTX
Private foundations and donor advised funds
PPTX
The secret to understanding planned giving
Charitable bequest fundraising: New results from 100 years of national data
Major gifts of assets in the aftermath of Covid-19
10 Strategies for Post COVID-19 fundraising in complex and major gifts
Top 10 charitable planning strategies for financial advisors 2020
The Statistics & Psychology of Baby Boomer Lifetime & Legacy Giving
Using "natural philanthropy" in fundraising
Top 10 legacy fundraising strategies from scientific research: National data ...
Natural philanthropy: How the natural origins of donor motivations drive powe...
Top 10 charitable planning strategies for financial advisors under the new ta...
Why cash is not king in fundraising: Results from 1 million nonprofit tax ret...
Top 10 charitable planning strategies updated for the new tax law
Using donor surveys in planned giving
The hidden code behind death-related financial decisions
Counting Revocable Planned Gifts in Fundraising - Return from Fantasy Island
Planned Giving Words that Work Part II
Church seminar in charitable estate planning
Ponzis, Pyramids, and Bubbles: An introduction to financial fraud
Messages that encourage bequest giving to cancer research
Private foundations and donor advised funds
The secret to understanding planned giving

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Presentation on HIE in infants and its manifestations
PDF
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
PDF
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
PDF
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PPTX
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
PPTX
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
PDF
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PPTX
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx
Presentation on HIE in infants and its manifestations
01-Introduction-to-Information-Management.pdf
O5-L3 Freight Transport Ops (International) V1.pdf
Saundersa Comprehensive Review for the NCLEX-RN Examination.pdf
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Cell Structure & Organelles in detailed.
human mycosis Human fungal infections are called human mycosis..pptx
ANTIBIOTICS.pptx.pdf………………… xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
Tissue processing ( HISTOPATHOLOGICAL TECHNIQUE
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
O7-L3 Supply Chain Operations - ICLT Program
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Introduction-to-Literarature-and-Literary-Studies-week-Prelim-coverage.pptx

Using Clickers In The Classroom

  • 1. Using Clickers in the Classroom Dr. Russell James III Texas Tech University
  • 2. Clickers are electronic student response systems usually allowing for A,B,C,D,E, or number responses
  • 3. Clickers v. Other response systems Everyone participates, not just the overly vocal Harder to just vote with majority than raising hands A pre-technology version gives students spiral flipbooks to hold up with pages for A, B, C, D, & E. C
  • 4. OK, so what can I do with them?
  • 5. How many semesters of calculus have you had? How many countries outside North America have you visited? Are undecided on your major? Quickly gathering information
  • 6. In class choice experiments
  • 7. Experiment Time! One of you will be picked to receive one of the choices you selected. You can receive $1.00 (cash) on the second to last day of this class. You can receive $1.05 (cash) on the last day of this class.
  • 8. Intervening slides followed by… Pick one You can receive $1.00 (cash) right now. You can receive $1.05 (cash) during the next meeting of this class.
  • 9. Class choices Voted to take the $1 on the next to last day of class (instead of $1.05 on the last day)? Fall ‘09: 32.2% (n=87) Spring ‘10: 35.8% (n=110) Voted to take $1 now (instead of $1.05 at the next class)? Fall ‘09: 66.3% (n=86) Spring ’10: 69.4% (n=111) Why the change? Note: Next class in 2 days. 5% difference. (365 days/2 days) X 5% ≈ 912% APR
  • 10.  
  • 11. Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease which is expected to kill 600 people. Choose a program to address the problem. A: 200 people will be saved B: 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved.
  • 12. Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease which is expected to kill 600 people. Choose a program to address the problem. A: 200 people will be saved B: 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved. Show Class Clicker Results
  • 13. Imagine that the US is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease which is expected to kill 600 people. Choose a program to address the problem. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. 72% A: 200 people will be saved B: 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved. 28% Show Published Study Results
  • 14.  
  • 16. 22% 78% Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. Show Published Study Results
  • 17.  
  • 18. 2 nd Option B: 600 expected to die… 1/3 chance that nobody will die. 2/3 chance that 600 people will die. 1 st Option B: 600 expected to die… 1/3 chance that 600 people will be saved. 2/3 chance that no people will be saved. 78% 28% Reframing the option as a loss changed the choices = Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. ≠ =
  • 19. Recall questions: Beginning of class Who has read the assigned material?
  • 20. Recall questions: Middle of class Rewards attendance and attentiveness Immediate instructor feedback Good responses -> Move on Poor responses -> Discuss more
  • 21. Recall question with poor responses “ Try to convince the people sitting around you that your answer is right. Then, answer the question again.”
  • 22. Recall questions End of class Instructor feedback for next lecture (no need to change “on the fly”) Multiple questions on screen possible with clickers in exam mode
  • 23. Predict the outcome of an experiment
  • 24. Describe an experiment Group A, B, & C female Asian-American college students were given a questionnaire followed by a math test . A: Gender-related questionnaire Ex: 3 reasons why you might prefer a single-sex dorm B: Ethnicity-related questionnaire Ex: did grandparents speak languages other than English? C: Neutral questionnaire
  • 25. Students predict experiment outcome Did drawing attention to issues of race or gender affect subsequent math scores? No effect for either Both gender focus and race focus lowered scores Both gender focus and race focus raised scores Gender focus raised scores; Race focus lowered scores Gender focus lowered scores; Race focus raised scores
  • 26. Show student predictions Did drawing attention to issues of race or gender affect subsequent math scores? No effect for either Both gender focus and race focus lowered scores Both gender focus and race focus raised scores Gender focus raised scores; Race focus lowered scores Gender focus lowered scores; Race focus raised scores
  • 27. Show experiment results and discuss M. Shih (Harvard), T. Pittinsky (Harvard), & N. Ambady (Harvard), 1999, Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80-83.
  • 28. Click when finished with a task
  • 29. Vote Before and after a debate/discussion Vote on best student created videos
  • 30. Rate the class Instead of waiting until end of the semester evaluations, end every class with the same evaluation question Track trends, lecture topics, methodologies
  • 31. Collect student opinions to begin a discussion
  • 32. Advanced applications When you want to try more experiments in class!
  • 33. Individual student Socratic questioning “ Tell me, John Smith, why was X a compelling choice for you?....... Sally Student, you answered Y. Why do you feel differently than John?”
  • 34. Clicker wars: The concept Divide students into large groups, e.g. gender, junior/senior. Work in teams of 2 or 3. One clicker per team. Winning team gets large reward. Winning group gets modest reward. Multiple choice questions. Wrong answer = turn off clicker, your team is out. But, you can STILL help others in the larger group.
  • 35. Clicker wars: This really works! Consistently the highest rated classes of the semester. Discuss wrong answers selected (teachable moments). End of section reviews or exam reviews.
  • 36. Real time tracking Some programs constantly track and display cumulative answer changes. Use separate laptop so you can see, but students can’t.
  • 37.  
  • 38. Real time tracking: Confusion meter Click A when the current topic doesn’t make sense Click B if it becomes clear later Tracks the number of students who are currently registering confusion
  • 39. Real time “focus group” response meter Use “rate the class” scale with instructions to click repeatedly, every slide, or every minute. Use screen recorder software (ex: BB Flashback, Camtasia) to record presentation from your webcam while recording your response meter screen (picture in picture) for drilling down on what sections generated what responses
  • 40.  
  • 41. High stakes, low stakes, or no stakes? Giving credit for clickers
  • 42.  
  • 43. Correct answers only Potential problem with cheating No multiple exam versions Potential problem with students who have time and a half learning disability accommodations.
  • 44. Hybrid Full credit if a threshold percentage of correct answers are reached. Correct answers only for pre-lecture questions. Participation only for mid-lecture questions. Clicker questions will be placed on exam.
  • 45. I forgot my clicker! Allow no credit or Allow X number of missed clicker days or Allow written answers turned in at end of class
  • 46. The clicker didn’t work! If clicker not indicating responses being received allow written responses at end of class (not later), but must show your clicker
  • 47. Preventing false participation “my best friend’s clicker” Take digital photos of class Announce and use as a deterrent Match with quick writing assignment Require each student to turn in only one by hand to you at end of class. TA spies looking for multiple clickers Counting heads If head count doesn’t match clicker count, assign quick writing for matching
  • 48. Slides by: Russell James III, J.D., Ph.D., CFP® Associate Professor – Texas Tech University, College of Human Sciences, Div. of Personal Financial Planning University of Georgia – College of Family & Consumer Sciences 2009 Outstanding Teacher of the Year Feel free to use any of these slides! Any comments or questions to russell.james@ttu.edu

Editor's Notes

  • #25: In the female-identity-salient condition, participants ( n = 14) were asked (a) whether they lived on or off campus, (b) whether they had a roommate, (c) whether their floors were coed or single sex, (d) whether they preferred coed or single-sex floors, (e) to list three reasons why they would prefer a coed floor, and (f) to list three reasons why they would prefer a single-sex floor. In the Asianidentity- salient condition, participants ( n = 16) were asked (a) whether their parents or grandparents spoke any languages other than English, (b) what languages they knew, (c) what languages they spoke at home, (d) what opportunities they had to speak other languages on campus, (e) what percentage of these opportunities were found in their residence halls, and (f) how many generations of their family had lived in America. In the control condition, participants ( n = 16) were asked (a) whether they lived on or off campus, (b) whether they used the university telephone service, (c) to rate on a 7- point scale how satisfied they were with the service, (d) whether they would consider subscribing to cable television, (e) how much they would be willing to pay per month for cable television, and (f) to list one or two reasons why they would or would not subscribe to cable television.
  • #26: In the female-identity-salient condition, participants ( n = 14) were asked (a) whether they lived on or off campus, (b) whether they had a roommate, (c) whether their floors were coed or single sex, (d) whether they preferred coed or single-sex floors, (e) to list three reasons why they would prefer a coed floor, and (f) to list three reasons why they would prefer a single-sex floor. In the Asianidentity- salient condition, participants ( n = 16) were asked (a) whether their parents or grandparents spoke any languages other than English, (b) what languages they knew, (c) what languages they spoke at home, (d) what opportunities they had to speak other languages on campus, (e) what percentage of these opportunities were found in their residence halls, and (f) how many generations of their family had lived in America. In the control condition, participants ( n = 16) were asked (a) whether they lived on or off campus, (b) whether they used the university telephone service, (c) to rate on a 7- point scale how satisfied they were with the service, (d) whether they would consider subscribing to cable television, (e) how much they would be willing to pay per month for cable television, and (f) to list one or two reasons why they would or would not subscribe to cable television.
  • #27: In the female-identity-salient condition, participants ( n = 14) were asked (a) whether they lived on or off campus, (b) whether they had a roommate, (c) whether their floors were coed or single sex, (d) whether they preferred coed or single-sex floors, (e) to list three reasons why they would prefer a coed floor, and (f) to list three reasons why they would prefer a single-sex floor. In the Asianidentity- salient condition, participants ( n = 16) were asked (a) whether their parents or grandparents spoke any languages other than English, (b) what languages they knew, (c) what languages they spoke at home, (d) what opportunities they had to speak other languages on campus, (e) what percentage of these opportunities were found in their residence halls, and (f) how many generations of their family had lived in America. In the control condition, participants ( n = 16) were asked (a) whether they lived on or off campus, (b) whether they used the university telephone service, (c) to rate on a 7- point scale how satisfied they were with the service, (d) whether they would consider subscribing to cable television, (e) how much they would be willing to pay per month for cable television, and (f) to list one or two reasons why they would or would not subscribe to cable television.