SlideShare a Scribd company logo
USING MODELS
MODELS Don’t mistake the map for the territory:
MODELS Don’t mistake the map for the territory:
MODELS Don’t mistake the map for the territory:
MODELS This picture shows  what your eyes see  at a facilitated workshop This sociogram is  one model  (one of many) of what happened  at the same workshop
MODELS What does the eye see?  What does the model ‘see’? What can the eye not see?  What can the model not see?
WHAT IS A SOCIOGRAM?   Sociograms show interaction patterns for a group of people Each circle represents an individual. Should you label the circle with their role? or name the individual? Does the seating plan influence how people interact? Each line represents a ‘speech act’. The direction of the line indicates who was talking to whom.
PHENOMENOLOGY Behaviourists  model  (make models to explain)  what people  do . Behaviourists demand observable evidence So behaviourists reject everything but observable behaviour. Do different observers see the same actions? Can observers see an action without attributing meaning to it? Phenomenologists  model  (make models to explain)  what people  experience . Intentionality = purpose,  be it conscious or otherwise Embodiment = body structure, skills, affordance (e.g. chairs don’t have affordance for flamingos, or in 18 th  century Japan) Worldliness = a model of the world  as previously experienced
IS IT REALLY THERE? Two people watch the same video One person sees something odd. The other person did not see it. Was it there? Behaviourists say ‘No’. We must replicate our results. Phenomenologists say ‘Yes’.  We only access reality through our perceptions.  If one person perceived it, then  (in some sense)  it was there.
IS IT REALLY THERE? Watch the video at: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/39199153/ns/today-books/   Count how many times people in the white tops pass the ball.
MERLEAU PONTY Merleau Ponty’s ‘Phenomenology of Perception’ is difficult (like Sartre). What follows is just what Isobel got from it (right or wrong) In a workshop, we ‘see’ many different realities: A simple exchange of knowledge and expertise Genuine attempts to collaborate Emotional reactions  (empathy, fear, helpfulness, embarrassment …)  Exercise of power  (or resisting power, or desisting from the use of power) Hard-nosed negotiation
MERLEAU PONTY In a workshop, as an event unfolds We seem to have many possible responses to choose from BUT: We perceive so many different realities Each reality gives a different meaning to the event Many realities demand different responses Must our response be acceptable to all meanings? Does one meaning have priority on this occasion? Suddenly it’s full of complexity, subtlety and dilemmas  Whenever we deal with people, we navigate through all this

More Related Content

PPT
Why mapping software is great for sales
PPTX
The improv method_presentation_jan2017
PPTX
Italian hand gestures
PPTX
Cone of Experience
PPTX
Psychology of magic
PPTX
Edgar-Dale-s-Cone-of-Experience-PPT-2.pptx
PPTX
"Look, Listen, and Maybe Speak" at UX Poland 2015
PDF
Theatre of life - Live guided role plays
Why mapping software is great for sales
The improv method_presentation_jan2017
Italian hand gestures
Cone of Experience
Psychology of magic
Edgar-Dale-s-Cone-of-Experience-PPT-2.pptx
"Look, Listen, and Maybe Speak" at UX Poland 2015
Theatre of life - Live guided role plays

Similar to Using models (20)

PPTX
097 181010 bookclub_this means this,this means that - chapter 3
PPTX
Dale's Cone of Experience
PPTX
cone of experience
PPTX
Art of Facilitating Language Learning
PPTX
EarthCorps Cross Cultural Communication
PPTX
Sayre School Crosss Cultural Communication
PDF
People Pattern Power
PPTX
Reflexive exercises to get over impasse
PPTX
French Immersion School Cross Cultural Communication
PPT
Chapter3thornock2015
PDF
Personal Space Proxemics
PDF
Coaching with polarities - Stretching by Robert Stamboliev
PDF
Overbeeke2007
PDF
Cultural Self Awareness Tools Suml
PPT
LREI Cross Cultural Communication for Faculty
PPTX
Stereotypes Simplify our Social World Greg DeShields.pptx
PPTX
Prescott College Cross Cultural Communication
PPTX
Multicultural Educators' Forum CCC
PDF
Mud Blindness
PDF
SN- Lecture 3
097 181010 bookclub_this means this,this means that - chapter 3
Dale's Cone of Experience
cone of experience
Art of Facilitating Language Learning
EarthCorps Cross Cultural Communication
Sayre School Crosss Cultural Communication
People Pattern Power
Reflexive exercises to get over impasse
French Immersion School Cross Cultural Communication
Chapter3thornock2015
Personal Space Proxemics
Coaching with polarities - Stretching by Robert Stamboliev
Overbeeke2007
Cultural Self Awareness Tools Suml
LREI Cross Cultural Communication for Faculty
Stereotypes Simplify our Social World Greg DeShields.pptx
Prescott College Cross Cultural Communication
Multicultural Educators' Forum CCC
Mud Blindness
SN- Lecture 3
Ad

More from Isobel Dunbar (16)

PPT
Motivation for facilitation
PPT
Philosophy and history
PPT
Negotiation
PPT
Managing self
PPT
Lifecycles
PPT
Inter agency
PPT
Inference and attribution
PPT
Ground rules
PPT
Flock theory
PPT
Experience and evidence
PPT
Dialogue
PPT
Creativity
PPT
Creating better groups
PPT
Conflict
PPT
Action research
Motivation for facilitation
Philosophy and history
Negotiation
Managing self
Lifecycles
Inter agency
Inference and attribution
Ground rules
Flock theory
Experience and evidence
Dialogue
Creativity
Creating better groups
Conflict
Action research
Ad

Using models

  • 2. MODELS Don’t mistake the map for the territory:
  • 3. MODELS Don’t mistake the map for the territory:
  • 4. MODELS Don’t mistake the map for the territory:
  • 5. MODELS This picture shows what your eyes see at a facilitated workshop This sociogram is one model (one of many) of what happened at the same workshop
  • 6. MODELS What does the eye see? What does the model ‘see’? What can the eye not see? What can the model not see?
  • 7. WHAT IS A SOCIOGRAM? Sociograms show interaction patterns for a group of people Each circle represents an individual. Should you label the circle with their role? or name the individual? Does the seating plan influence how people interact? Each line represents a ‘speech act’. The direction of the line indicates who was talking to whom.
  • 8. PHENOMENOLOGY Behaviourists model (make models to explain) what people do . Behaviourists demand observable evidence So behaviourists reject everything but observable behaviour. Do different observers see the same actions? Can observers see an action without attributing meaning to it? Phenomenologists model (make models to explain) what people experience . Intentionality = purpose, be it conscious or otherwise Embodiment = body structure, skills, affordance (e.g. chairs don’t have affordance for flamingos, or in 18 th century Japan) Worldliness = a model of the world as previously experienced
  • 9. IS IT REALLY THERE? Two people watch the same video One person sees something odd. The other person did not see it. Was it there? Behaviourists say ‘No’. We must replicate our results. Phenomenologists say ‘Yes’. We only access reality through our perceptions. If one person perceived it, then (in some sense) it was there.
  • 10. IS IT REALLY THERE? Watch the video at: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/39199153/ns/today-books/ Count how many times people in the white tops pass the ball.
  • 11. MERLEAU PONTY Merleau Ponty’s ‘Phenomenology of Perception’ is difficult (like Sartre). What follows is just what Isobel got from it (right or wrong) In a workshop, we ‘see’ many different realities: A simple exchange of knowledge and expertise Genuine attempts to collaborate Emotional reactions (empathy, fear, helpfulness, embarrassment …) Exercise of power (or resisting power, or desisting from the use of power) Hard-nosed negotiation
  • 12. MERLEAU PONTY In a workshop, as an event unfolds We seem to have many possible responses to choose from BUT: We perceive so many different realities Each reality gives a different meaning to the event Many realities demand different responses Must our response be acceptable to all meanings? Does one meaning have priority on this occasion? Suddenly it’s full of complexity, subtlety and dilemmas Whenever we deal with people, we navigate through all this