SlideShare a Scribd company logo
AnalySys Sciences
1
Instrumental in your success
http://analysciences.com
http://analysciences.com
Validation
2
What is validation?
Validation is the process
used to confirm that the
analytical procedure
employed for a specific
test is suitable for its
intended use.
Analytical methods need to be
validated or revalidated:
-before their introduction into
routine use,
-whenever the analytical
conditions change,
-whenever the method is changed.
3
4
Validation guidelines
Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research,
USFDA
http://www.fda.gov/cder/
Reference Standards
A reference standard is a highly purified
compound that is well characterized.
Chromatographic methods rely heavily
on a reference standard to provide
accurate data. Therefore the quality of
the reference standard is critical.
5
Accuracy
Accuracy is the measure of how close the
experimental value is to the true value.
Recommendations:
Recovery data, at least in triplicate, at
each level (80, 100 and 120% of label
claim).
The mean is an estimate of accuracy and
the RSD is an estimate of sample
analysis precision.
6
LOD / LOQ
Limit of Detection
The lowest concentration of analyte in a
sample that can be detected, but not
necessarily quantitated. Usually s/n 2:1 or
3:1
Limit of Quantitation
The lowest concentration of analyte in a
sample that can be determined with
acceptable precision and accuracy under
the stated conditions. Usually s/n 10:1
7
Linearity
That range of analyte concentrations over
which the detector yields a linear response.
The working sample concentration and samples
tested for accuracy should be in the linear
range.
Recommendations
The linearity range depends on the purpose of the test
method. For example, the range for drug content
uniformity would be NLT ± 20%.
Regression coefficient (R2) NLT 0.999. Intercept and slope
should be indicated.
8
Precision
Measure of how close the data
values are to each other for a
number of measurements under
the same analytical conditions.
Precision is defined by three
components:
Repeatability
Intermediate precision
Reproducibility
9
Repeatability
Injection repeatability: Multiple
injections of the same sample in the
same conditions.
Analysis repeatability: Multiple
measurements of a sample by the same
analyst under the same analytical
conditions.
Recommendation: A minimum of 10
injections with an RSD of 1%.
10
Intermediate Precision
Evaluates the reliability of the method in a different environment other
than that used during development of the method.
The objective is to ensure that the method will provide the same
results when similar samples are analyzed once the method
development phase is over.
Depending on time and resources, the method can be tested on
multiple days, analysts, instruments, etc.
11
Reproducibility
The precision between
laboratories as in
collaborative studies.
Recommendations:
It is not normally expected if
intermediate precision is
accomplished.
12
Range and Recovery
Range: The interval between the high and low levels of analyte studied.
Recommendation is usually +/- 20%.
Recovery: The amount/weight of the compound of interest analyzed as a
percentage to the theoretical amount present in the medium.
Full recovery should be obtained for the compound(s) of interest.
Simpler sample preparation procedure will result in a lower variation of recovery.
13
Robustness
Measure of the method's ability to
remain unaffected by small, but
deliberate variations in method
parameters.
e.g., column type, column temperature, pH of
mobile phase, reagents, flow rate, etc.
14
Sample Solution Stability
Solution stability of the drug substance should be evaluated.
Most laboratories use autosamplers with overnight runs and the sample will be in
solution for hours before the test procedure is completed. This is of concern
especially for drugs that can undergo degradation by hydrolysis, photolysis or
adhesion to glassware.
Recommendations: Data to support the sample solution stability under normal
laboratory conditions for the duration of the test procedure should be generated.
15
Specificity and Selectivity
The analyte should have no
interference from other
extraneous components and be
well resolved from them.
16
System Suitability Tests.
The accuracy and precision of data begin
with a well-behaved chromatographic system.
The system suitability specifications and tests
are parameters that help achieve this
purpose.
17
System Suitability Parameters - USP
Plate count > 2000 plates/meter
Tailing factor < 2
Resolution > 2
Partition ratio > 2
Relative retention > 1.5
Precision / repeatability RSD </= 1% for n >/= 5
18
Typical
SST
report
19
General Points
The sample and standard should be dissolved in the mobile phase. If
that is not possible, then avoid using too much organic solvent as
compared to the mobile phase.
The sample and standard concentrations should be close if not the
same.
The samples should be bracketed by standards during the analytical
procedure.
If the sample is filtered, adhesion of the analyte to the filter can
happen. This will be of importance especially for low level impurities.
Data to validate this aspect should be submitted.
20
Hardware validation – IQ/OQ/PQ
Installation Qualification
Was the instrument installed as per vendor’s guidelines?
Operational Qualification
Is the system performing as per claimed specifications?
Performance Qualification
Is the analysis compliant for each sample? (System suitability
tests)
21
Software and data system validation
22
21 CFR Part 11
What is 21CFR-11?
CFR = Code of Federal Regulations
Codification of the general rules and
regulations of the US Federal
government.
Divided into 50 books (titles).
Each title has several chapters.
21 CFR Part 11
Title 21 deals with the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) rules and
regulations.
Title 21-Part 11 defines the criteria
under which electronic records and
electronic signatures are considered to be
trustworthy, reliable and equivalent to
paper records.
21 CFR Part 11 Regulations
Three Subparts :
1) Subpart A : General Provision
2) Subpart B : Electronic Records
3) Subpart C : Electronic Signatures
Subpart A : General Provision
•Regulations establish the criteria the FDA considers for electronic records and electronic
signature to be trustworthy, reliable, and generally equivalent to paper.
•Applies to all records in electronic form under any records requirement within any FDA
regulation.
•Electronic records are considered equivalent to full handwritten signatures, initials, and
other general signings.
•Electronic records may be used in accordance with Part 11 unless paper records are
specifically required.
•Computer system (hardware and software), controls, and relevant documentation must
be available for review during FDA inspections.
Subpart B : Electronic Record
“Any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information
representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved,
or distributed by a computer system.”
Must develop procedures and controls to ensure authenticity, integrity and
confidentiality, and that signer cannot repudiate the signed record.
The controls must:
Be validated
Maintain accurate and complete records
Limit the system to authorized persons
Protect records through retention period
Contain audit trails that are secure, operator independent, computer-generated, time-stamped, cover the
creation , modification and deletion of records and do not obscure previous information
Contd….
•Allow for the performance of operational system checks, authority checks, and device
checks to ensure system, record, and data integrity
•Ensure appropriate personnel qualifications
•Policies written and followed to hold personnel accountable for actions and to deter
records falsification.
•Control over system documentation including distribution, access, use, revision and change
control.
•Must develop procedures and controls that ensure authenticity, integrity, and
confidentiality of electronic records and comply with all other parts of Section 11.10
•Must use additional measures (e.g. document encryption, digital signature standards) to
ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality
Contd..
•Signed electronic records must include the printed name of the signer, date and time of
signature, and the purpose of the signature (e.g. review, approval etc.) Each of these must
be readable by display or printout.
•Electronic signature and handwritten signatures must be linked to ensure signatures
cannot be excised, copied, transferred or falsified.
Subpart C : Electronic Signature
“A computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols executed, adopted, or
authorized by an individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the individual’s
handwritten signature.”
•Must be unique to an individual and not reassigned
•Identity of individual must be verified by organization
•Must certify electronic signature system to the agency prior to or at the time of use
of the system
•Certification must be submitted in paper form and, upon agency request, provide
certification that signature is legally binding
Cont…
•Non-Biometric signatures must:
Contain at least two different identification components (e.g. User ID and Password)
Single sign-on with multiple tasks: Use all identification components at first, with partial
identification for each task thereafter
Multiple sign-on without continuous access requires all identification components to be used
each time
Be used only by the owner
Ensure use by other individuals is precluded and does not occur without collaboration by at
least two other individuals
•Biometric signatures must ensure use by the owner
Cont…..
Persons using electronic signatures must use controls to ensure security and integrity and
should include:
Assuring that no two individuals have the same combination of identification code and
password
Periodic check, recall, or revision of identification code and password
Loss management and replacement procedures
Testing of devices (i.e. tokens or cards) that produce or maintain identification codes or
passwords to ensure proper function and unaltered state.
•Unauthorized use safeguards
•Report attempts in to:
Security unit
Management, as appropriate
Where does
21CFR-11 apply?
• Information management
related to manufacturing
processes.
GMP
• Clinical data managementGCP
• Data Acquisition
• Laboratory InformationGLP

More Related Content

PPTX
Using reference materials to meet validation & verification requirements for ...
PPTX
Calibration and Quality controls of automated hematology analyzer
PPSX
Basics of laboratory internal quality control, Ola Elgaddar, 2012
PPTX
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
PDF
Quality control and automation by Dr Anurag Yadav
PPTX
Application of microbiological data
PPTX
Method validation
Using reference materials to meet validation & verification requirements for ...
Calibration and Quality controls of automated hematology analyzer
Basics of laboratory internal quality control, Ola Elgaddar, 2012
Validation of lab instruments and quantitative test methods
Quality control and automation by Dr Anurag Yadav
Application of microbiological data
Method validation

What's hot (20)

PDF
Calabration principles-chapter1
PPT
PDF
The Importance of Third Party Controls
PDF
Method verification
PPTX
Acusera 24.7 Interlaboratory Data Management
PPTX
KPIs in Microbiology
PPTX
Acusera 24.7 QC Data Management
PDF
LT033 RIQAS Explained MAY17
PPTX
Troubleshooting IQC / EQAS
PPTX
Acusera Third Party Controls
PDF
Acusera 24.7 Interlaboratory Data Management - June 17 LT244
PPTX
Troubleshooting iqc eqas 19.07.2018
PPTX
1st NENALAB Meeting_Item 32: Perform QA/QC in the lab by Rob De Hayr, GLOSOLA...
PDF
LT027 Acusera Third Party Controls May17
PPTX
RIQAS External Quality Assessment for Medical Laboratories
PPSX
Internal quality control (IQC) in coagulation lab
PPT
Quality assignment(1)
PPTX
Quality Control
PDF
How to Measure Uncertainty
PDF
Consolidate & Save
Calabration principles-chapter1
The Importance of Third Party Controls
Method verification
Acusera 24.7 Interlaboratory Data Management
KPIs in Microbiology
Acusera 24.7 QC Data Management
LT033 RIQAS Explained MAY17
Troubleshooting IQC / EQAS
Acusera Third Party Controls
Acusera 24.7 Interlaboratory Data Management - June 17 LT244
Troubleshooting iqc eqas 19.07.2018
1st NENALAB Meeting_Item 32: Perform QA/QC in the lab by Rob De Hayr, GLOSOLA...
LT027 Acusera Third Party Controls May17
RIQAS External Quality Assessment for Medical Laboratories
Internal quality control (IQC) in coagulation lab
Quality assignment(1)
Quality Control
How to Measure Uncertainty
Consolidate & Save

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
Headspace analysis
PDF
Analysis of Blood Alcohol by Headspace with GC/MS and FID Detection
PDF
Introduction to analytical instrumentation.
PDF
Apat 2013 gc workshop 2
PPT
CHM260 - Gas Chromatography
PPT
Gas chromatography . ppt
PPT
HPLC Principle,Instrumentation and Application
PDF
Analsys Sciences - Introduction to HPLC
PPTX
Chromatography Data System: Comply with Regulations
PPTX
Hplc analysis of nicotinamide, pyridoxine, riboflavin
PPTX
Method Validation - Repeatability
PPTX
New microsoft office power point presentation
PPTX
Method Validation - Linearity
PPT
2 4 method-validation-hplc-case-study
PDF
International Analytical Methodology
PPTX
Navara rice
PPTX
Semi synthetic minimal cells
PPT
10 glycolysis
PPTX
HPLC Trouble Shotting
PDF
Gc basic pdf
Headspace analysis
Analysis of Blood Alcohol by Headspace with GC/MS and FID Detection
Introduction to analytical instrumentation.
Apat 2013 gc workshop 2
CHM260 - Gas Chromatography
Gas chromatography . ppt
HPLC Principle,Instrumentation and Application
Analsys Sciences - Introduction to HPLC
Chromatography Data System: Comply with Regulations
Hplc analysis of nicotinamide, pyridoxine, riboflavin
Method Validation - Repeatability
New microsoft office power point presentation
Method Validation - Linearity
2 4 method-validation-hplc-case-study
International Analytical Methodology
Navara rice
Semi synthetic minimal cells
10 glycolysis
HPLC Trouble Shotting
Gc basic pdf

Similar to Validation basics (20)

PDF
21 CFR Part 11: A Concise Overview
PPTX
Epitome Corporate PPT
PPTX
Types of validation & validation of specific dosage.pptx
PPTX
Overview of computer system validation
PDF
Validation of pharmaceutical processes
PDF
Handling deviations & unexpected results during method validation
PPT
Phase Appropriate Method Validation Aryo Boston-Nitto 2
PDF
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records and Signatures FDA Compliance
PPTX
Analytical Method Validation
PPT
Monograph changes
PDF
Data Integrity II - Chromatography data system (CDS) in Pharma
PDF
Beamex CMX and GAMP good automated manufacturing practices
PPT
21 cfr part 11 compliance
PDF
USP(1225,1226) ICH Q2(R1) by agilent
PDF
Analytical method validation icp.pdf
PDF
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdf
PPTX
Analytical method validation 2020
PPTX
amv ppt.pptx
PPTX
Computerized system validation
PDF
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION -A PREDICAMENT OF SERVICE PROVIDER
21 CFR Part 11: A Concise Overview
Epitome Corporate PPT
Types of validation & validation of specific dosage.pptx
Overview of computer system validation
Validation of pharmaceutical processes
Handling deviations & unexpected results during method validation
Phase Appropriate Method Validation Aryo Boston-Nitto 2
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records and Signatures FDA Compliance
Analytical Method Validation
Monograph changes
Data Integrity II - Chromatography data system (CDS) in Pharma
Beamex CMX and GAMP good automated manufacturing practices
21 cfr part 11 compliance
USP(1225,1226) ICH Q2(R1) by agilent
Analytical method validation icp.pdf
Validation of Analytical Methods.pdf
Analytical method validation 2020
amv ppt.pptx
Computerized system validation
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION -A PREDICAMENT OF SERVICE PROVIDER

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
PDF
Heart disease approach using modified random forest and particle swarm optimi...
PDF
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
PPTX
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
PDF
DASA ADMISSION 2024_FirstRound_FirstRank_LastRank.pdf
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PPTX
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
PPTX
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
PPTX
Tartificialntelligence_presentation.pptx
PPTX
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PDF
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PDF
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
PPTX
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
Transform Your ITIL® 4 & ITSM Strategy with AI in 2025.pdf
Heart disease approach using modified random forest and particle swarm optimi...
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
Group 1 Presentation -Planning and Decision Making .pptx
DASA ADMISSION 2024_FirstRound_FirstRank_LastRank.pdf
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
Tartificialntelligence_presentation.pptx
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
A comparative study of natural language inference in Swahili using monolingua...
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx

Validation basics

  • 1. AnalySys Sciences 1 Instrumental in your success http://analysciences.com http://analysciences.com
  • 3. What is validation? Validation is the process used to confirm that the analytical procedure employed for a specific test is suitable for its intended use. Analytical methods need to be validated or revalidated: -before their introduction into routine use, -whenever the analytical conditions change, -whenever the method is changed. 3
  • 4. 4 Validation guidelines Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, USFDA http://www.fda.gov/cder/
  • 5. Reference Standards A reference standard is a highly purified compound that is well characterized. Chromatographic methods rely heavily on a reference standard to provide accurate data. Therefore the quality of the reference standard is critical. 5
  • 6. Accuracy Accuracy is the measure of how close the experimental value is to the true value. Recommendations: Recovery data, at least in triplicate, at each level (80, 100 and 120% of label claim). The mean is an estimate of accuracy and the RSD is an estimate of sample analysis precision. 6
  • 7. LOD / LOQ Limit of Detection The lowest concentration of analyte in a sample that can be detected, but not necessarily quantitated. Usually s/n 2:1 or 3:1 Limit of Quantitation The lowest concentration of analyte in a sample that can be determined with acceptable precision and accuracy under the stated conditions. Usually s/n 10:1 7
  • 8. Linearity That range of analyte concentrations over which the detector yields a linear response. The working sample concentration and samples tested for accuracy should be in the linear range. Recommendations The linearity range depends on the purpose of the test method. For example, the range for drug content uniformity would be NLT ± 20%. Regression coefficient (R2) NLT 0.999. Intercept and slope should be indicated. 8
  • 9. Precision Measure of how close the data values are to each other for a number of measurements under the same analytical conditions. Precision is defined by three components: Repeatability Intermediate precision Reproducibility 9
  • 10. Repeatability Injection repeatability: Multiple injections of the same sample in the same conditions. Analysis repeatability: Multiple measurements of a sample by the same analyst under the same analytical conditions. Recommendation: A minimum of 10 injections with an RSD of 1%. 10
  • 11. Intermediate Precision Evaluates the reliability of the method in a different environment other than that used during development of the method. The objective is to ensure that the method will provide the same results when similar samples are analyzed once the method development phase is over. Depending on time and resources, the method can be tested on multiple days, analysts, instruments, etc. 11
  • 12. Reproducibility The precision between laboratories as in collaborative studies. Recommendations: It is not normally expected if intermediate precision is accomplished. 12
  • 13. Range and Recovery Range: The interval between the high and low levels of analyte studied. Recommendation is usually +/- 20%. Recovery: The amount/weight of the compound of interest analyzed as a percentage to the theoretical amount present in the medium. Full recovery should be obtained for the compound(s) of interest. Simpler sample preparation procedure will result in a lower variation of recovery. 13
  • 14. Robustness Measure of the method's ability to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate variations in method parameters. e.g., column type, column temperature, pH of mobile phase, reagents, flow rate, etc. 14
  • 15. Sample Solution Stability Solution stability of the drug substance should be evaluated. Most laboratories use autosamplers with overnight runs and the sample will be in solution for hours before the test procedure is completed. This is of concern especially for drugs that can undergo degradation by hydrolysis, photolysis or adhesion to glassware. Recommendations: Data to support the sample solution stability under normal laboratory conditions for the duration of the test procedure should be generated. 15
  • 16. Specificity and Selectivity The analyte should have no interference from other extraneous components and be well resolved from them. 16
  • 17. System Suitability Tests. The accuracy and precision of data begin with a well-behaved chromatographic system. The system suitability specifications and tests are parameters that help achieve this purpose. 17
  • 18. System Suitability Parameters - USP Plate count > 2000 plates/meter Tailing factor < 2 Resolution > 2 Partition ratio > 2 Relative retention > 1.5 Precision / repeatability RSD </= 1% for n >/= 5 18
  • 20. General Points The sample and standard should be dissolved in the mobile phase. If that is not possible, then avoid using too much organic solvent as compared to the mobile phase. The sample and standard concentrations should be close if not the same. The samples should be bracketed by standards during the analytical procedure. If the sample is filtered, adhesion of the analyte to the filter can happen. This will be of importance especially for low level impurities. Data to validate this aspect should be submitted. 20
  • 21. Hardware validation – IQ/OQ/PQ Installation Qualification Was the instrument installed as per vendor’s guidelines? Operational Qualification Is the system performing as per claimed specifications? Performance Qualification Is the analysis compliant for each sample? (System suitability tests) 21
  • 22. Software and data system validation 22
  • 24. What is 21CFR-11? CFR = Code of Federal Regulations Codification of the general rules and regulations of the US Federal government. Divided into 50 books (titles). Each title has several chapters.
  • 25. 21 CFR Part 11 Title 21 deals with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) rules and regulations. Title 21-Part 11 defines the criteria under which electronic records and electronic signatures are considered to be trustworthy, reliable and equivalent to paper records.
  • 26. 21 CFR Part 11 Regulations Three Subparts : 1) Subpart A : General Provision 2) Subpart B : Electronic Records 3) Subpart C : Electronic Signatures
  • 27. Subpart A : General Provision •Regulations establish the criteria the FDA considers for electronic records and electronic signature to be trustworthy, reliable, and generally equivalent to paper. •Applies to all records in electronic form under any records requirement within any FDA regulation. •Electronic records are considered equivalent to full handwritten signatures, initials, and other general signings. •Electronic records may be used in accordance with Part 11 unless paper records are specifically required. •Computer system (hardware and software), controls, and relevant documentation must be available for review during FDA inspections.
  • 28. Subpart B : Electronic Record “Any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or distributed by a computer system.” Must develop procedures and controls to ensure authenticity, integrity and confidentiality, and that signer cannot repudiate the signed record. The controls must: Be validated Maintain accurate and complete records Limit the system to authorized persons Protect records through retention period Contain audit trails that are secure, operator independent, computer-generated, time-stamped, cover the creation , modification and deletion of records and do not obscure previous information
  • 29. Contd…. •Allow for the performance of operational system checks, authority checks, and device checks to ensure system, record, and data integrity •Ensure appropriate personnel qualifications •Policies written and followed to hold personnel accountable for actions and to deter records falsification. •Control over system documentation including distribution, access, use, revision and change control. •Must develop procedures and controls that ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality of electronic records and comply with all other parts of Section 11.10 •Must use additional measures (e.g. document encryption, digital signature standards) to ensure authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality
  • 30. Contd.. •Signed electronic records must include the printed name of the signer, date and time of signature, and the purpose of the signature (e.g. review, approval etc.) Each of these must be readable by display or printout. •Electronic signature and handwritten signatures must be linked to ensure signatures cannot be excised, copied, transferred or falsified.
  • 31. Subpart C : Electronic Signature “A computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols executed, adopted, or authorized by an individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the individual’s handwritten signature.” •Must be unique to an individual and not reassigned •Identity of individual must be verified by organization •Must certify electronic signature system to the agency prior to or at the time of use of the system •Certification must be submitted in paper form and, upon agency request, provide certification that signature is legally binding
  • 32. Cont… •Non-Biometric signatures must: Contain at least two different identification components (e.g. User ID and Password) Single sign-on with multiple tasks: Use all identification components at first, with partial identification for each task thereafter Multiple sign-on without continuous access requires all identification components to be used each time Be used only by the owner Ensure use by other individuals is precluded and does not occur without collaboration by at least two other individuals •Biometric signatures must ensure use by the owner
  • 33. Cont….. Persons using electronic signatures must use controls to ensure security and integrity and should include: Assuring that no two individuals have the same combination of identification code and password Periodic check, recall, or revision of identification code and password Loss management and replacement procedures Testing of devices (i.e. tokens or cards) that produce or maintain identification codes or passwords to ensure proper function and unaltered state. •Unauthorized use safeguards •Report attempts in to: Security unit Management, as appropriate
  • 34. Where does 21CFR-11 apply? • Information management related to manufacturing processes. GMP • Clinical data managementGCP • Data Acquisition • Laboratory InformationGLP