SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Visualization of Enrollment
Data using Chord Diagrams
L. Blasco-Soplon, J. Grau-Valldosera, J. Minguillón
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Barcelona, Spain
Context
● UOC: fully online open university
– Learners with very diverse backgrounds
– No enrollment requirements
● How many subjects?
● Which ones?
– Recommendations from
● Subject / course / degree planning (text / table based)
● Mentor
● “Common sense”
● First enrollment is known to be “critical”
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Learning Analytics
● Plenty of available data
– Since 1994 (EHEA / Bologna degrees since 2008)
– Thousands of students each semester
● Hundreds per degree
– Tens of thousands of subject combinations
– Academic performance
● Subject level (PASS / FAIL)
● Semester level (dropout)
● Can we do it better?
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Our proposal
● Analyze subject combinations
– 2 x 2 contingency tables (PASS / FAIL)
● Visualize enrollment data
– Intra-semester
– Inter-semester
●
Provide better support (esp. 1st
semester)
– Learners: adjust enrollment
– Mentors: improve recommendations
– Degree managers: reduce dropout
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Available data (I)
● Paper: Business and Economics degree
– From Spring 1999 to Spring 2011 (25 semesters)
– 21792 learners
– 501 different subjects
– 328467 subject enrollments
● New data from EHEA B&E degree (10 sems.)
– 5930 learners
– 64 different subjects (59 in the 1st
semester)
– 63460 subject enrollments (17610 in the 1st
sem.)
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Available data (II)
● First semester only:
– High dropout rates
– Are learners following institutional advice?
● 5698 learners take 2 or more subjects
– 17378 subject enrollments
– 59 different subjects
● 13 subjects: 90.6% of learners, 20 subjects: 95.5%
– 764 different subject combinations
● 129 combinations: 90.0% of learners
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Chord diagrams
● Circular layout for
representing relationships
in matrix data as a graph
– Segments: nodes
– Chords: edges
● Position, color, size
● Popularized in 2007 by the
NY Times infographic
Close-Ups of the Genome
by Giovanni Gherdovich
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Visualization of Enrollment data using Chord Diagrams - GRAPP 2015
Why chords?
● Explore new ways to provide support
● Subjects can be sorted clockwise
– From most to least popular subject (size)
– Each subject can be independently colored
according to its own PASS / FAIL ratio
● Subject combinations
– Popularity + % of learners passing / failing one / two
subjects
● Available in D3.js
– Interactivity “included” as part of the visualization
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Chord parametrization
● Number of segments
– Number of chords grows quadratically
– Up to 10 segments looks fine, 6-8 seems optimal
● Segment colors
– From red (FAIL) to green (PASS) through yellow
– Other thresholds can be used: [0, 0.4, 0.6, 1]
● Chord colors
– Percentage of learners passing the two subjects
– Same red-yellow-green coloring
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Interactivity
● By default, show
– Subjects
● Size: Importance (number of learners)
● Color: Perfomance (PASS / FAIL ratio)
– Chords
● Size: Number of learners taking such combination
● Color: Number of learners passing the two subjects
● Interaction
– On a segment: info about that subject and its
combinations with other subjects
– On a chord: info about that combination
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Results
demo
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Conclusions
● Pros:
– Compact visualization, nice aesthetics
● Easy to understand (green: OK, red: KO)
– Interactivity reduces data overload
– Easy integration into any web based system
● Cons:
– 13 subjects generate 13*12/2=78 chords!
● Lack of data for non-common subjects / combinations
– Even the simplest visualization needs explanation
– What about blind / colorblind learners?
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Current and future work
● Evaluate the visualization compared to tables
● Explore other visualization types
– Concentric chord diagrams (inter-semester)
– D3.js: parallel sets, ...
● Include other parameters
– Learners' satisfaction
– Total time spent in the subject
– Weight as a inter-semester dropout factor
● Integrate it into the UOC enrollment process
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
Thank you!
jminguillona[at]uoc[dot]edu
twitter/@jminguillona
http://bit.ly/1wcZCBk
Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany

More Related Content

PDF
Golovko_Resume
PPT
STaR Chart
PDF
Linked data and Graph properties
PPTX
Star chart
PPT
An Overview Of Mmpi
PDF
Visualisierung Raum-Zeit Würfel
PPTX
P1.2 energyefficiency
PDF
Supporting Social Network Analysis Using Chord Diagram in Process Mining
Golovko_Resume
STaR Chart
Linked data and Graph properties
Star chart
An Overview Of Mmpi
Visualisierung Raum-Zeit Würfel
P1.2 energyefficiency
Supporting Social Network Analysis Using Chord Diagram in Process Mining

More from Julià Minguillón (20)

PDF
introducció a les dades obertes i altres hypes
PDF
Introduction to OPEN DATA and other hypes (2017/18)
PDF
Using learning analytics to support applied research and innovation in higher...
PDF
Visualización del diseño competencial de un plan de estudios
PDF
Why do teachers (not) use the institutional repository?
PDF
JPEG 1991 GK Wallace paper on JPEG standard
ODP
Introducció a Open Data / Big Data
PPTX
Relationships between users, resources and services in learning object reposi...
PPTX
From institutional repositories to personal collections of learning resources
PPTX
Educational Data Mining: cerrando el círculo del proceso de aprendizaje en en...
PPT
Analyzing OpenCourseWare usage by means of social tagging
PPT
Conocimiento abierto, objetos de aprendizaje y repositorios
PPT
Promoting OERs through Open Repositories and Social Networks
PPT
Cerca d’informació a Internet: implicacions jurídiques
PPT
Learning Object Repositories: a learner centered perspective
PDF
ECEL 2009 Keynote J. Minguillón
ODP
On cascading small decision trees
ODP
Sustainable Information Management for Personal Learning Environments
ODP
Closing remarks of the IV UOC UNESCO Chair International Seminar
ODP
Closing remarks of the III UOC UNESCO Chair International Seminar
introducció a les dades obertes i altres hypes
Introduction to OPEN DATA and other hypes (2017/18)
Using learning analytics to support applied research and innovation in higher...
Visualización del diseño competencial de un plan de estudios
Why do teachers (not) use the institutional repository?
JPEG 1991 GK Wallace paper on JPEG standard
Introducció a Open Data / Big Data
Relationships between users, resources and services in learning object reposi...
From institutional repositories to personal collections of learning resources
Educational Data Mining: cerrando el círculo del proceso de aprendizaje en en...
Analyzing OpenCourseWare usage by means of social tagging
Conocimiento abierto, objetos de aprendizaje y repositorios
Promoting OERs through Open Repositories and Social Networks
Cerca d’informació a Internet: implicacions jurídiques
Learning Object Repositories: a learner centered perspective
ECEL 2009 Keynote J. Minguillón
On cascading small decision trees
Sustainable Information Management for Personal Learning Environments
Closing remarks of the IV UOC UNESCO Chair International Seminar
Closing remarks of the III UOC UNESCO Chair International Seminar
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
AI Strategy room jwfjksfksfjsjsjsjsjfsjfsj
PPTX
Introduction to Knowledge Engineering Part 1
PPT
Reliability_Chapter_ presentation 1221.5784
PDF
.pdf is not working space design for the following data for the following dat...
PPTX
01_intro xxxxxxxxxxfffffffffffaaaaaaaaaaafg
PPT
Miokarditis (Inflamasi pada Otot Jantung)
PDF
Introduction to Data Science and Data Analysis
PDF
Clinical guidelines as a resource for EBP(1).pdf
PPTX
Microsoft-Fabric-Unifying-Analytics-for-the-Modern-Enterprise Solution.pptx
PDF
22.Patil - Early prediction of Alzheimer’s disease using convolutional neural...
PPTX
Data_Analytics_and_PowerBI_Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Database Infoormation System (DBIS).pptx
PPTX
oil_refinery_comprehensive_20250804084928 (1).pptx
PPTX
1_Introduction to advance data techniques.pptx
PDF
Lecture1 pattern recognition............
PPTX
Business Ppt On Nestle.pptx huunnnhhgfvu
PPTX
Computer network topology notes for revision
PPTX
Introduction to Basics of Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing -Unit No. 1...
PPTX
Supervised vs unsupervised machine learning algorithms
PPTX
IBA_Chapter_11_Slides_Final_Accessible.pptx
AI Strategy room jwfjksfksfjsjsjsjsjfsjfsj
Introduction to Knowledge Engineering Part 1
Reliability_Chapter_ presentation 1221.5784
.pdf is not working space design for the following data for the following dat...
01_intro xxxxxxxxxxfffffffffffaaaaaaaaaaafg
Miokarditis (Inflamasi pada Otot Jantung)
Introduction to Data Science and Data Analysis
Clinical guidelines as a resource for EBP(1).pdf
Microsoft-Fabric-Unifying-Analytics-for-the-Modern-Enterprise Solution.pptx
22.Patil - Early prediction of Alzheimer’s disease using convolutional neural...
Data_Analytics_and_PowerBI_Presentation.pptx
Database Infoormation System (DBIS).pptx
oil_refinery_comprehensive_20250804084928 (1).pptx
1_Introduction to advance data techniques.pptx
Lecture1 pattern recognition............
Business Ppt On Nestle.pptx huunnnhhgfvu
Computer network topology notes for revision
Introduction to Basics of Ethical Hacking and Penetration Testing -Unit No. 1...
Supervised vs unsupervised machine learning algorithms
IBA_Chapter_11_Slides_Final_Accessible.pptx
Ad

Visualization of Enrollment data using Chord Diagrams - GRAPP 2015

  • 1. Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams L. Blasco-Soplon, J. Grau-Valldosera, J. Minguillón Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Barcelona, Spain
  • 2. Context ● UOC: fully online open university – Learners with very diverse backgrounds – No enrollment requirements ● How many subjects? ● Which ones? – Recommendations from ● Subject / course / degree planning (text / table based) ● Mentor ● “Common sense” ● First enrollment is known to be “critical” Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 3. Learning Analytics ● Plenty of available data – Since 1994 (EHEA / Bologna degrees since 2008) – Thousands of students each semester ● Hundreds per degree – Tens of thousands of subject combinations – Academic performance ● Subject level (PASS / FAIL) ● Semester level (dropout) ● Can we do it better? Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 4. Our proposal ● Analyze subject combinations – 2 x 2 contingency tables (PASS / FAIL) ● Visualize enrollment data – Intra-semester – Inter-semester ● Provide better support (esp. 1st semester) – Learners: adjust enrollment – Mentors: improve recommendations – Degree managers: reduce dropout Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 5. Available data (I) ● Paper: Business and Economics degree – From Spring 1999 to Spring 2011 (25 semesters) – 21792 learners – 501 different subjects – 328467 subject enrollments ● New data from EHEA B&E degree (10 sems.) – 5930 learners – 64 different subjects (59 in the 1st semester) – 63460 subject enrollments (17610 in the 1st sem.) Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 6. Available data (II) ● First semester only: – High dropout rates – Are learners following institutional advice? ● 5698 learners take 2 or more subjects – 17378 subject enrollments – 59 different subjects ● 13 subjects: 90.6% of learners, 20 subjects: 95.5% – 764 different subject combinations ● 129 combinations: 90.0% of learners Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 7. Chord diagrams ● Circular layout for representing relationships in matrix data as a graph – Segments: nodes – Chords: edges ● Position, color, size ● Popularized in 2007 by the NY Times infographic Close-Ups of the Genome by Giovanni Gherdovich Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 9. Why chords? ● Explore new ways to provide support ● Subjects can be sorted clockwise – From most to least popular subject (size) – Each subject can be independently colored according to its own PASS / FAIL ratio ● Subject combinations – Popularity + % of learners passing / failing one / two subjects ● Available in D3.js – Interactivity “included” as part of the visualization Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 10. Chord parametrization ● Number of segments – Number of chords grows quadratically – Up to 10 segments looks fine, 6-8 seems optimal ● Segment colors – From red (FAIL) to green (PASS) through yellow – Other thresholds can be used: [0, 0.4, 0.6, 1] ● Chord colors – Percentage of learners passing the two subjects – Same red-yellow-green coloring Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 11. Interactivity ● By default, show – Subjects ● Size: Importance (number of learners) ● Color: Perfomance (PASS / FAIL ratio) – Chords ● Size: Number of learners taking such combination ● Color: Number of learners passing the two subjects ● Interaction – On a segment: info about that subject and its combinations with other subjects – On a chord: info about that combination Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 12. Results demo Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 13. Conclusions ● Pros: – Compact visualization, nice aesthetics ● Easy to understand (green: OK, red: KO) – Interactivity reduces data overload – Easy integration into any web based system ● Cons: – 13 subjects generate 13*12/2=78 chords! ● Lack of data for non-common subjects / combinations – Even the simplest visualization needs explanation – What about blind / colorblind learners? Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany
  • 14. Current and future work ● Evaluate the visualization compared to tables ● Explore other visualization types – Concentric chord diagrams (inter-semester) – D3.js: parallel sets, ... ● Include other parameters – Learners' satisfaction – Total time spent in the subject – Weight as a inter-semester dropout factor ● Integrate it into the UOC enrollment process Visualization of Enrollment Data using Chord Diagrams – GRAPP 2015, Berlin, Germany