Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Project Managers & Implementing Agencies

Rainwater harvesting:
a lifeline for human
well-being

RAINWATER HARVESTING:
A LIFELINE FOR HUMAN WELL-BEING

A report prepared for UNEP
by Stockholm Environment Institute

Fist published by United Nations Environment Programme and
Stockholm Environment Institute in 2009

Copyright© 2009, United Nations Environment Programme/SEI

This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form
for educational or non-profit purposes, without special permission from
the copyright holder(s) provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
The United Nations Environment Programme would appreciate receiving
a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source

No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial
purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United
Nations Environment Programme.

Application for such permission, with a statement of purpose and extent
of production should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, P Box 30552,
.O.
Nairobi, 00100 Kenya.

The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publi-
cation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part
of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status
of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimi-
tation of its frontiers or boundaries.

Mention of a commercial company or product in this publication does not
imply endorsement by the United Nations Environment Programme. The
use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products
for publicity or advertising is not permitted.

Layout: Richard Clay/SEI

Cover photo: © ICRAF

Rainwater Harvesting - UNEP
ISBN: 978 - 92 - 807 - 3019 - 7
Job No. DEP/1162/NA

UNEP promotes
environmentally sound practices
globally and in its own activities. This
publication is printed on 100% FSC paper using
other eco-friendly practices. Our distribution policy
aims to reduce UNEP’s carbon footprint.

FOREWORD
domestic, industrial and environmental (environmental
flows. With renewable accessible freshwater globally
limited to 12,500 km3, the managing of water is a great
challenge facing humanity. This makes it essential to
find sustainable methods for managing water which
incorporate all water users (environment, agriculture,
domestic and industry) by promoting ecosystems
management, resource efficiency, and governance and
climate change adaptation.

There are numerous positive benefits for harvesting
rainwater. The technology is low cost, highly
decentralized empowering individuals and communities
to manage their water. It has been used to improve access
to water and sanitation at the local level. In agriculture
rainwater harvesting has demonstrated the potential of
In 2008 the world witnessed multiple crises including doubling food production by 100% compared to the
a food one which resulted in unrest in many areas of 10% increase from irrigation. Rainfed agriculture is
the world. These tensions may well foreshadow future practiced on 80% of the world’s agricultural land area,
challenges as they relate to providing sufficient food for and generates 65-70% of the world’s staple foods. For
six, rising to nine billion people. Unless we get more instance in Africa more than 95% of the farmland is
intelligent in the way we manage agriculture, the world rainfed, almost 90% in Latin America.
is likely to head into deeply challenging times.
The biggest challenge with using rainwater harvesting
Water and the good and services provided by ecosystems is that it is not included in water policies in many
are part of this urgent need for an intelligent management countries. In many cases water management is based on
response not least in relation to food production. renewable water, which is surface and groundwater with
little consideration of rainwater. Rainwater is taken as a
The Millennium Ecosystems Assessment report, in which ‘free for all’ resource and the last few years have seen an
UNEP played an important role, demonstrated the links increase in its use. This has resulted in over abstracting,
between healthy ecosystems and food production. These drastically reducing water downstream users including
include providing food, water, fiber, genetic material; ecosystems. This has introduced water conflicts in
regulating soil erosion, purifying water and wastes, some regions of the world. For the sustainable use of
regulating floods, regulating diseases and pests; and water resources, it is critical that rainwater harvesting
supporting the formation of soil, photosynthesis and is included as a water sources as is the case for ground
nutrient recycling. wand surface water.

Water is an integral part of ecosystems functioning. Its This publication highlights the link between rainwater
presence or absence has a bearing on the ecosystems harvesting, ecosystems and human well being and draws
services they provide. Relatively larger amounts of water the attention of readers to both the negative and positive
are used to generate the ecosystem services needed to aspects of using this technology and how the negative
ensure provisioning of basic supplies of food, fodder and benefits can be minimized and positive capitalized.
fibers. Today rainfed and irrigated agriculture use 7,600
of freshwater globally to provide food. An additional Achim Steiner
1,600 km3 of water is required annually to meet the
millennium development goal on hunger reduction United Nations Under-Secretary General,
which addresses only half of the people suffering from Executive Director,
hunger. This figure does not include water required for United Nations Environment Programme

v

Editors:
Editor: Jennie Barron, Stockholm Environment Institute, York, UK/Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm, Sweden
Reviewer: Mogens Dyhr-Nielsen, UNEP-DHI Collaborating Center, Hørsholm, Denmark
Changyeol Choi, UNEP-DEPI, Nairobi, Kenya

Chapter authors:
Jessica Calfoforo Salas, Kahublagan sang Panimalay Fnd, Iloilo City, Philippines
Luisa Cortesi, Megh Pyne Abhiyan, Bihar, India
Klaus W. König, Überlingen, Germany
Anders Malmer, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden
Eklavya Prasad, Megh Pyne Abhiyan, Bihar, India
Bharat Sharma, International Water Management Institute, New Delhi, India

Contributing authors:
Mohamed Boufaroua. M, l’Aménagement et de la conservation des terres agricoles (ACTA), Tunis,
Tunisie
Mohamed Bouitfirass, National Institute of Agronomic research (INRA), SETTAT, Morocco
Mogens Dyhr-Nielsen, UNEP-DHI Collaborating Center, Hørsholm, Denmark
Mohammed El Mourid, Centre International de Recherche Agricole dans les zones Sèches (ICARDA),
Tunis, Tunisie
Johann Gnadlinger, Brazilian Rainwater Catchment and Management Association, (ABCMAC),
Juazeiro, Brazil
Mooyoung Han, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Günter Hauber-Davidson, Water Conservation Group Pty Ltd , Sydney, Australia
Harald Hiessl, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Kalsruhe, Germany
Ulrik Ilstedt, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden
Andrew Lo, Chinese Culture Univesity, Taipei, Taiwan
Farai Madziva, Harvest Ltd, Athi River, Kenya
Jean-Marc Mwenge Kahinda, Universityof Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Filbert B. Rwehumbiza, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
Siza D. Tumbo, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
Adouba ould Salem, Projet de développement pastoral et de gestion de parcours (PADEL), République
Islamique de Mauritanie
Qiang Zhu, Gansu Research Institute for Water Conservacy, Wuxi City, China

vi

Contents

FOREWORD v

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix

1 Introduction: Rainwater harvesting as a way to support ecosystem services
and human well-being 1

2 Background: The water component of ecosystem services and in human
well-being development targets 4

3 Rainwater harvesting for management of watershed ecosystems 14

4 Rainwater harvesting in the management of agro-eco systems 23

5 Forests working as rainwater harvesting systems 34

6 Rainwater harvesting for water security in rural and urban areas 44

7 Rainwater harvesting providing adaptation opportunities to climate change 56

8 Summary of chapters and case studies 63

9 Key messages and suggestions 66

Acknowledgements 67

APPENDIX I 68

APPENDIX II 69

vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY in the landscape. The variable rainfall also result in poor
crop water availability, reducing rainfed yields to 25-
1. Rainfall, ecosystems, and human well- 50% of potential yields, often less than 1 tonne cereal
being per hectare in South Asia and sub-Sahara Africa. The low
Rainfall and soil water are fundamental parts of all agricultural productivity often offsets a negative spiral in
terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems which supplies goods landscape productivity, with degradation of ecosystem
and services for human well-being. Availability and services through soil erosion, reduced vegetation cover,
quality of water determines ecosystem productivity, and species decline.
both for agricultural and natural systems. There is
increasing demand on water resources for development All vegetation uses rainwater, whether they are managed
whilst maintaining healthy ecosystems, which put water such as crops or tree plantations, or if they are natural
resources under pressure. Ecosystem services suffer when forests, grasslands and shrubs. Often the ecosystems
rain and soil water becomes scarce due to changes from services from natural vegetation are not fully appreciated
wet to dry seasons, or during within-seasonal droughts. for its livelihood support until it is severely degraded, or
Climate change, demand for development and already disappeared, through for example, deforestation. Natural
deteriorating state of ecosystems add to these pressures and permanent crop cover has the same effect as many
so that future challenges to sustain our ecosystems are rainwater harvesting interventions. By retaining landscape
escalating. water flows, increased rainfall infiltration increase growth
of vegetation, and decrease soil erosion, surface runoff
There is an immediate need to find innovative and incidence flooding. Managing water resources in the
opportunities enabling development and human well- landscape is thus management the permanent vegetation
being without undermining ecosystem services. Among cover to enhance biomass production for fibres and
such opportunities one can ask: What potential can energy, to harvest non-timber forest products and to
rainwater harvesting offer to enable increased human enrich landscape biodiversity. Although forest and trees
well-being whilst protecting our environment? What ‘consumes’ rainfall, they also safe-guard and generate
role can small-scale decentralised rainfall harvesting and many ecosystem services for livelihoods and economic
storage play in integrated water resource management? good.
And in which specific contexts may rainwater harvesting
create synergies between good ecosystems management
and human well-being? Rain water harvesting is the 3. Mitigating floods and reducing pressures on
collective term for a wide variety of interventions to use water resources around urban areas
rainfall through collection and storage, either in soil or in Today, more people live in urban areas than in rural
man-made dams, tanks or containers bridging dry spells areas globally. Cities can be considered as “artificial
and droughts. The effect is increased retention of water in ecosystems”, where controlled flows of water and
the landscape, enabling management and use of water for energy provide a habitat for the urban population.
multiple purposes. Accordingly, the principles of ecosystem management
also apply to sustainable urban water management.
2. Rainwater harvesting create synergies by Rainwater harvesting has increasingly been promoted
upgrading rainfed agriculture and enhancing and implemented in urban areas for a variety of reasons.
productive landscapes In Australia, withdrawals of water supply to the urban
Farms are undisputedly the most important ecosystems for areas have been diminishing due to recurrent droughts.
human welfare. Rainfed agriculture provides nearly 60% This has spurred private, commercial and public house-
of global food value on 72% of harvested land. Rainfall owners to invest in rainwater harvesting for household
variability is an inherent challenge for farming in tropical consumption. The increased use of rainwater harvesting
and sub-tropical agricultural systems. These areas also provides additional water supply and reduce pressures
coincide with many rural smallholder (semi-)subsistence of demand on surrounding surface and groundwater
farming systems, with high incidence of poverty and resources. In parts of Japan and South Korea, rainwater
limited opportunities to cope with ecosystem changes. harvesting with storage has been implemented also as
Water for domestic supply and livestock is irregular a way to reduce vulnerability in emergencies, such as
through temporal water flows and lowering ground water earth quakes or severe flooding which can disrupt public

ix

r a i n wat e r h a r v e s t i n g : a l i f e l i n e f o r h u m a n w e l l - b e i n g

water supply. The effect of multiple rainwater harvesting Rainwater harvesting has in many cases not only increased
interventions on ecosystem services in urban areas are human well-being and ecosystem services, but also acted as
two-fold. Firtsly, it can reduce pressures of demand on a way of improving equity, gender balance and strengthen
surrounding surface and groundwater resources. Secondly, social capital in a community. To improve domestic water
the rainwater harvesting interventions can reduce storm supply with rainwater harvesting interventions, save
flow, decreasing incidence of flooding and short peak women and children from the tedious work of fetching
flows. water. It also improves household sanitation and health.
The value of community organisation enabled through
implementation of rainwater harvesting in the watershed
4 Climate change adaptation and the role of has strengthen communities to address other issues relation
rainwater harvesting to development, health and knowledge in their livelihoods
Climate change will affect rainfall and increase and environment. These are important benefits which can
evaporation, which will put increasing pressures on our further help individuals and communities to improve both
ecosystems services. At the same time, development by ecosystems management as well as human well-being.
a growing population will affect our ecosystems as we
increase our demands for services, including reliable and
clean water. Rainwater harvesting will continue to be an 6. Suggestions:
adaptation strategy for people living with high rainfall • Consider rainfall as an important manageable
variability, both for domestic supply and to enhance crop, resource in water management policies, strategies
livestock and other forms of agriculture. and plans. Then rainwater harvesting interventions
are included as a potential option in land and water
resource management for human well-being and
5. Enabling the benefits of rainwater ecosystems productivity.
harvesting
The rainwater use by crops and natural vegetation is • Realize that rainwater harvesting is not a ‘silver
in many cases by-passed in integrated water resource bullet’, but it can be efficient as a complementary and
management (IWRM), which primarily focus on viable alternative to large-scale water withdrawals,
streamflow or groundwater resources. Consequently, and reduce negative impacts on ecosystems services,
the rainwater harvesting interventions are not widely not least in emerging water-stressed basin
recognised in water policy or in investment plans, despite
the broad base of cases identifying multiple benefits for • Rainwater harvesting is a local intervention with
development and sustainability. By introducing policies primarily local benefits on ecosystems and human
recognising the value of ecosystem services and the role livelihoods. Stakeholder consultation and public
of rainfall to support these systems, rain water harvesting participation are key to negotiate positive and
emerges as a set of interventions addressing multiple issues negative trade-offs potentially emerging, comparing
on human well-being and improved ecosystems services. rainwater harvesting interventions with alternative
The extensive interventions of rainwater harvesting in water management interventions.
for example India, China, Brazil, and Australia have
occurred where governments and communities jointly • Access and right to land can be a first step to rainwater
make efforts in enabling policies and legislation, together harvesting interventions. Special measures should be
with cost-sharing and subsidises for rainwater harvesting in place so rainwater harvesting interventions also
interventions. benefit land-poor and landless in a community

Rainwater harvesting will affect the landscape water flows, • Establish enabling policies and cost –sharing
and subsequently the landscape ecosystem services. If the strategies, (including subsides) to be provided together
collected water is used solely for consumptive use, as by with technical know-how and capacity building.
crops and trees, the trade-off of alternative water use has
to be considered. If the water is mostly used as domestic
supply, most water will re-enter the landscape at some
stage, possibly in need of purification

x

CHAPTER 1

Introduction: Rainwater harvesting as a way to support
ecosystem services and human well-being
Author: Jennie Barron, Stockholm Environment Institute, York, UK/Stockholm Resilience
Centre, Stockholm, Sweden

E cosystem services are fundamental for human well-
being. Our health, livelihoods and economies rely on
well functioning ecosystem services which range from
Future pressures from climate change, growing
population, rapid landuse changes and already degraded
water resources quality, may intensify water shortages
provision of ambience and recreational opportunities to in specific communities and exacerbate existing
flood storage and pollution assimilation. Availability of environmental and economic concerns. As growing
water is critical for ecosystem health and productivity, pressure mounts on our water resources, globally and
ensuring supply of a range of products and services, locally, we need to manage resources more efficiently
to benefit human well-being (e.g., GEO4, 2007; MA, in order to meet multiple demands and purposes. What
2005) With growing multiple demands of water, the are examples of ‘good practices’ in water management?
ecosystems supporting and regulating the structure and Are the effective pathways for development known,
function of natural ecosystems may be eroding (WRI et that meet multiple demands whilst avoiding negative
al., 2005; WRI et al., 2008). There is an urgent need to ecosystems impacts?
find opportunities to enable development and promote
human well-being without undermining ecosystem In this report, the concept of rainwater harvesting is
health. What opportunities can rainwater harvesting examined for its potential to increase human well-being
offer to enable sustainable development, increase without eroding the ecosystems functions that water
human well-being, and environmental protection? serves in the local landscape. Examples from diverse
geographical and societal settings are examined, to
Rainwater harvesting locally collects and stores rainfall demonstrate the benefits and constraints of rainwater
through different technologies, for future use to meet the harvesting technologies in addressing multiple demands
demands of human consumption or human activities. for freshwater in specific locations The aim is to compile
The art of rainwater harvesting has been practised since a synthesis of experiences that can provide insight into
the first human settlements. It has been a key entry the multiple opportunities rainwater harvesting can have
point in local water management ever since, buffering when addressing human well-being, while continuing
supplies of rainfall to service the human demand of to sustain a range of ecosystem services.
freshwater. As it involves the alteration of natural
landscape water flows, it requires water managers to
1.1 Scope
carefully consider the tradeoffs; however, it can create
multiple benefits, offering synergies between different This synthesis of linkages between ecosystem
demands and users at a specific location (Malesu et al., services, human well-being and rainwater harvesting
2005: Agarwal et al., 2005). To many water managers, interventions examines 29 cases from diverse
rainwater harvesting is a technique to collect drinking economic and environmental settings. The cases were
water from rooftops, or to collect irrigation water in selected to present economic activities (like forestry,
rural water tanks. However, rainwater harvesting has agriculture, watershed development and, rural and
much wider perspectives, in particular if it is considered urban development) in relation to different rainwater
in relation to its role in supporting ecosystem goods and harvesting technologies, water uses, and hydro-climatic
services. and economic settings (Fig. 1.1). The indicators
of impacts on ecosystems are described using the
overarching framework of the Millennium Ecosystem

1


Figure 1.1: Case studies of rainwater harvesting implementation presented in the publication

Assessment (MA, 2005), applied to identify key water- References
related issues (GEO4, 2007). The human well-being
indicators used directly stem from the Millennium A. Agarwal A.,and S. Narain . 2005. Dying wisdom:
Development Goals and targets (UN MDG web sites, Rise, fall and potential of India’s traditional water
2009; UN Millennium Declaration, 2000). harvesting systems 4th edition. . Eds., State of Indias
Environment, a citizens’ report 4, Centre for Science
and Environment, New Delhi, (404 pp)
1.2 Organisation of this report
GEO4. 2007. Global Environmental Outlook 4:
This report systematically synthesises the close links Environment for development. United Nations
between human well-being and ecosystem services Environment Programme, Nairobi/ Progress Press,
through a number of rainwater harvesting cases. The Malta
cases are organised into thematic chapters addressing Malesu, M, Oduor, A.R., Odhiambo, O.J. eds.
rainwater harvesting systems, their roles and their 2008. Green water management handbook: rainwater
impacts (Fig. 1.2; Chapter 3-7; Appendix II). The harvesting for agricultural production and ecological
chapter themes were selected based on the economic sustainability Nairobi, Kenya : World Agroforestry
importance of the specific themes for human well-being Centre ICRAF 229p.
and contain examples in which rainwater harvesting Millennium Ecosystems Assessment (MA). 2005.
has, and may continue to play, an integral role. The Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island
cases were selected to represent a wide variety of Press, Washington D.C.
social, economic and hydro-climatic conditions. United Nations Millennium Development Goal
They exemplify a diverse set of rainwater harvesting Indicators (UN MDG). 2009. Official web site for
technologies, and uses of the collected water. monitoring MDG indicators. http://unstats.un.org/
unsd/mdg/Default.aspx Last accessed January 2009
The report synthesises the positive and negative impacts UN Millennium Declaration, 2000. Resolution adopted
of the rainwater harvesting cases (Chapter 8), using by the General Assembly (A/RES/55/2) 18/09/2000
a pre-defined set of indicators of ecosystems impacts World Resources Institute (WRI) with United
and human well-being. The outcomes are interpreted Nations Development Programme, United Nations
in a number of key messages and recommendations Environment Programme, World Bank. 2005. The
(Chapter 9).

2

Figure 1.2: Readers guide to this report on rainwater harvesting, ecosystems and human well-being.

Wealth of the Poor: Managing Ecosystems to Fight
Poverty. Washington D.C. , WRI
World Resources Institute (WRI) with United
Nations Development Programme, United Nations
Environment Programme, World Bank. 2008. World
Resources 2008: Roots of Resilience - Growing the
Wealth of the Poor. Washington D.C.

3


CHAPTER 2

Background: The water component of ecosystem
services and in human well-being development targets

2.1 Rainwater harvesting and
livelihood and economic returns to humans as food,
ecosystem services:
fodder, fibres and timber, in addition to products for
Rain water harvesting, water flows and pharmaceutical use, diverse genetic resources and fresh
ecosystem services
water.. Abstraction of water for human use is circa 3,600
km3, or 25 % of renewable freshwater flows annually
Rainwater harvesting is often an intervention intended to (MA, 2005). These abstractions mainly provide
augment the Provisioning Services of the environment irrigation water (70%) to increase crop production.
for human well-being. Provisioning Services, as Use of water for drinking, and public, commercial and
defined in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, other societal needs is essential but relatively minor
include environmental services such as improved and in quantity, and much is returned to landscape, often
safe water supplies, or increased crop production. A through waste water systems.
closer analysis shows that rainwater harvesting often
has many more impacts, both positive and negative ►►Rainwater harvesting is a way of increasing the
on ecosystem services, and extending to regulating, provisioning capacity at a specific location. Many
cultural and supporting services (Table 2.1). rainwater harvesting interventions to date are primarily
to increase crop/fodder/food/timber production, or to
Provisioning ecosystem services and rainwater provide domestic/public/commercial supplies of water.
harvesting: Water is essential for all living beings, for
consumptive use. Plants and vegetation are by far the Regulating ecosystem services and rainwater
largest water consumers, but they also provide direct harvesting: The regulating services are in addition

Table 2.1: Ecosystems functions and the effect of rainwater harvesting

Ecosystem services Effect of rainwater harvesting intervention…

can increase crop productivity, food supply and income
can increase water and fodder for livestock and poultry
Provisioning can increase rainfall infiltration, thus recharging shallow groundwater sources and base flow in rivers
can regenerate landscapes increasing biomass, food, fodder, fibre and wood for human consumption
improves productive habitats, and increases species diversity in flora and fauna
can affect the temporal distribution of water in landscape
reduces fast flows and reduces incidences of flooding
Regulating reduces soil erosion
can provide habitat for harmful vector diseases
bridges water supply in droughts and dry spells
rain water harvesting and storage of water can support spiritual, religious and aesthetic values
Cultural
creates green oasis/mosaic landscape which has aesthetic value
can enhance the primary productivity in landscape
Supporting
can help support nutrient flows in landscape, including water purification

4

to the supporting services, discussed below, and are ►►Rainwater harvesting will not primarily affect these
essential for human well-being as they control the type supporting services. Indirectly, soil formation may
and provisioning capacity of ecosystems in specific change from a natural course as in situ management
locations. Water flows across the landscape play a role interventions are implemented. Also leakage of nutrients
in a range of regulation services as water is primarily may change, but indirectly, mainly due to changing from
involved in many of them. The primary roles of the natural landuse patterns to agricultural uses rather than
presence (or absence) of water are in erosion control, from implementing in situ rainwater harvesting in the
climatic control, pest and disease control (through fields.
habitat regulation), water quality control and control of
natural hazards. To conclude, rainwater harvesting is often implemented
to improve local provisioning capacity by ecosystems
►►Implementation of rainwater harvesting interventions for human well-being. However, as the landscape water
may affect the regulating services of the landscape as the balance is affected by increased rainwater harvesting,
landscape water flows change. As mentioned earlier, soil other services, in particular regulating services related
conservation measures to reduce soil erosion also act as to water abundance and availability, can be affected.
in situ rainwater harvesting measures. Ex situ rainwater Cultural services can be either negatively (if resources
harvesting and storage in the urban and rural landscape are diminished due to rainwater harvesting) or positively,
affects flooding and flow duration over seasons. depending on the local context.
Increasing the numbers of ponds and dams storing
harvested rainwater in the landscape may increase the Water flows in the landscape and effects of
incidence of malaria, but if covered, or if water is stored rainwater harvesting
underground, this may not impact incidence of malaria in Rainfall is the main source of freshwater in all land-
the specific location. based ecosystems, whether natural or managed by
humans. From arid deserts to the humid tropical
Cultural ecosystem services and rainwater rainforests, the flow of water through the ecosystem
harvesting: Water has strong cultural and religious shapes the characteristic fauna and flora as well as
values. These values are critical for human spiritual the soil systems. The land surfaces globally receive
well-being, and are recognised as having an essential 113,000 km3 of rainfall. Of this, approximately 41,000
role in societal interactions, once primary resources are km3 (36%) is manifested as surface runoff in the liquid
provided. Water also has an aesthetic value, enhancing phase—the so-called ‘blue water’ of rivers, streams and
garden and ornamental plant growth, and providing lakes. The remaining amount, 64%, of the rainfall, is
green “oases,” for example, in urban areas. evaporated through vegetation, from soil surfaces and
from water surfaces within the landscape.
►►Increasing access to water through rainwater harvesting
in a community or household may act to enhance the Rainwater harvesting is principally the management of
access and ability to carry out religious and spiritual these two partitioning points in the water flow. At the
rituals. It can also increase the aesthetic use of water. At local scale, such as a farm field, the flows partition the
the landscape scale, water features are often protected incoming rainfall at the soil surface, either infiltrating
and given specific values and protection by the local the water into the soil or diverting the water as surface
community. runoff (Fig. 2.1). Within the soil, the second partitioning
point is at the plant roots where water is either taken
Supporting ecosystem services: The supporting up by the vegetation, or contributes to the recharge of
services pre-determine the conditions for all other shallow or deep groundwater. Depending on the soil
services. Water flows play an essential role as a medium surface conditions, infiltration can range from 100% in
for the transport of nutrients and contaminants, in the a well managed agricultural soil, to 100% runoff from a
shaping of soils, and in photosynthesis. Together with paved road or rooftop. The second partitioning point can
soil conditions and climate conditions the water balance be managed, indirectly, through planting different plant
will determine the net primary production level at a species, improving crop uptake capacity, modifying
given location. plant root depths, and altering soil management
practices in agriculture, through enhancing/depleting

5


soil health, including soil organic matter content. are implemented, the partitioning is changed. One
In situ rainwater harvesting interventions (Fig. 2.1) change is to increase infiltration and storage of water
address both partitioning points at the field scale. Many in the soil. This has short term advantages (based on
soil management practises, such as soil conservation a single rainfall event) as it slows the flow of water,
measures that enhance the soil infiltration capacity and which reduces soil erosion, minimizes flooding and
soil moisture storage, can alter the partitioning process. limits damage to built structures due to storm water
Practises that enhance root water uptake for crop growth flows (Fig. 2.2). A longer term advantage (on the scale
act as an ‘in situ rainwater harvesting’ intervention. of days to months) is an effect of the slower flows of
Ex situ rainwater harvesting, in contrast, alters the water within the landscape. The longer residence times
partitioning process at the local field scale. enable water to be accessed during dry periods, and used
for productive purposes, including human consumption,
livestock watering and increased crop and vegetation
growth.

Figure 2.2: principal flow response curve from
an urban catchment with and without rainwater
harvesting in place, showing the effect of slower
flow through the landscape (contributed by K.
König)

While rainwater harvesting can increase crop and
other vegetation productivity through improved water
access, reducing soil erosion and incidences of flooding
Figure 2.1: Landscape water balance flows a) downstream, harvested rainfall may increase depletion
without rainwater harvesting, and b) an example of of downstream users’ access to water conveyed
flow paths with rain water harvesting interventions downstream as surface runoff or downgradient as
with water partitioning points at the soil surface groundwater. At a certain point, if the consumptive use
(1), and in the soil (2). Rainwater harvesting is of water resources such as for crop or other vegetation
principally about managing water partitioning in growth is complete, the loss of downstream access to
these points. the water may be severe and irreversible (Box 2.1).
Further interventions may affect the landscape water
flows so it is impossible to restore downstream or
At the landscape scale (or meso-scale, 1 km2-10,000 downgradient access, i.e., the water balance undergoes
km2), rainfall partitioning and flow paths are the same a regime shift. Such regime shifts include altering the
as at the field scale, but the quantities cannot simply be timing of delivery of surface runoff, for example when
aggregated from field scale to landscape scale, as water deforestation or afforestation occurs, or when irrigated
often re-distributes itself within the field, and/or along a agriculture affects groundwater levels and/or water
slope gradient. When rainwater harvesting interventions quality (through salinization, for example). Shifts in

6

Box 2.1: Managing regime shifts in landscape water balances

Increasingly, it is recognised that the multiple inter- alter a field to an unproductive state, and, with a
ventions by humans on ecosystems sometimes cre- single event, possibly irretrievably damage the field
ate unexpected and irretrievable changes in the serv- through land subsidence or a landslide. With in-
ices provided. These unexpected changes are often creasing interventions to abstract water, communi-
referred to as ‘tipping points’, where an ecosystem ties and resource managers should be aware that
or its services shift from one production regime to interventions at different scales can feedback unex-
another. In water resource management such tip- pectedly, and erode ecosystem services permanent-
ping points have been experienced in watershed ly. On the other hand, efficient and productive water
and river basins subject to excessive consumptive and land usage, for example through many small-
and re-allocation of water resources (example left scale rainwater harvesting interventions, has shown
hand figure). An example is the Aral Sea, which due positive change, where interventions have resulted
to irrigation water outtake, is permanently damaged in increased opportunity and productivity of ecosys-
with concomitant reductions in ecosystem services tem services (right hand figure, case a).
generated. At a smaller scale, excessive erosion can

flow regimes are difficult to remediate. To date, there is in promoting human well-being has been variously
limited synthesised evidence to document the impact of defined.1 Four key areas stand out as particularly
rainwater harvesting on downstream water flows (Box
2.2).
1 For example, the 2006 Human Development Report
2.2 Rainwater and human well-being (UNDP, 2006), which focuses on water, divides water’s
role in human well-being into two categories: water for
Water as an essential good for human well- life (drinking water, sanitation, health) and water for live-
being lihoods (water scarcity, risk and vulnerability; water for
Water is an essential commodity for all living beings: agriculture); a Poverty Environment Partnership paper
for direct consumption to sustain life and health, for (ADB et al., 2006) looks at four dimensions through
indirect consumption through water required to grow which water can impact poverty and human well-being:
food, fodder and fibres, and for maintenance of the through livelihoods, health, vulnerability to natural haz-
range of ecosystem services needed to support and ards and pro-poor economic growth; and the World Water
sustain economic and social activities. Water’s role Assessment Programme (UNESCO, 2006) considers:

7


Box 2.2: Potential impacts on stream flow of rainwater harvesting in South Africa

In the last two decades, rainwater harvesting has 50, 100 %) was compared to long-term naturalised
been have been implemented in the rural areas of flows. The results showed that both in situ and ex
South Africa to help address the Millennium Devel- situ rainwater harvesting caused marginal to major
opment Goals. As South Africa is increasingly water decreases in runoff compared with the runoff from
stressed, it is important to ensure flows for healthy the virgin catchment (natural vegetation), depend-
rivers and streams as well as water supply for hu- ing on adoption rate. It also showed that different
mans. By using a decision support tool (RHADESS) technologies impact different flow regimes. The in
for evaluating rainwater harvestingoptions, both in- situ rain water harvesting technique has a relatively
dications of suitability and potential impacts can be greater impact on high flows, while ex situ interven-
assessed. Application to two watersheds showed that tions have a greater impact on low flows.
the suitability of in situ or ex situ rainwater harvest-
ing ranged from 14% to 67% of the area served. The J. Mwenge Kahinda et al., 2008 (Case 2.1)
impact of different levels of rainwater harvesting (0,

important when linking water with improvements of • water and livelihoods: water to support rural
human well-being: livelihoods and sustain economic activity; and

• water and health: domestic water supplies for • water and vulnerability: water as a component in
human consumption, hygiene and sanitation; natural disasters and disaster mitigation.

• water and basic provisioning: water for producing A globally accepted set of indicators of human well-
food, fodder and fibres; 2 being are the Millennium Development Goals and
associated targets, which were developed and agreed in
2 water for health; water in food, agriculture and for rural 2000 (UN Millennium Declaration, 2000). Rainwater
livelihoods; water in the energy and industrial sectors; harvesting can play both a direct and indirect role in
and water and risk management. Further, there are other the achievement of many of these goals (Table 2.2),
definitions of the dimensions of human well-being, for particularly in the area of basic human needs and health.
example in the MA (2005), which points out five key A more comprehensive view of human well-being is
areas: basic material for a good life, freedom and choice, taken by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA,
health, good social relations and security. Further, the 2005) in which human well-being is not only a result
MEA addresses the issue of well-functioning ecosystems of good health and adequate basic provision of food,
being a pre-requisite to enable the development of these shelter and other material necessities, but also related to
basic human well-being aspects. freedom of choice and action, security and the need for
good social relations (MA, 2005). In this context several

8

rainfed and irrigated agriculture appropriate 7,700 km3
cases of rainwater harvesting, especially as an element
of freshwater globally to provide food (CA, 2007). Of
in watershed management, can play a significant role,
this, approximately 2,600 km3 is direct withdrawals for
especially for social relations, where water management
irrigation purposes. To meet the MDG Hunger goal,
has long been a unifying factor. There is increasing
an additional volume of 1,850 to 2,200 km3 of water
evidence that watershed management with rain water
needs to be appropriated annually, based upon current
harvesting has strengthened social capital which in turn
agricultural practises and assuming balanced diets (Fig.
can have a significant impact on development of other
2.3; SEI, 2005). To feed all a reasonable diet by 2050
ecosystem services for human well-being (e.g., Joshi et
may require almost doubling of today’s water resources.
al., 2005; Kerr, 2002; Barron et al., 2007).
With renewable accessible freshwater globally limited
to 12,500 km3, it is a great challenge facing humanity.
The Millennium Development Goals:
The consumptive use of water for crops and vegetation
increasing pressure on water and ecosystem
to provide other biomass goods such as timber, fibres
services?
for clothing, wood for energy etc. is not included in the
Several MDGs are closely related to water for health
above numbers.
and sanitation. The MDG Target 7C aims to halve
water supply deficits, presenting a formidable challenge A third dimension is the sustainable management of
for investment and social and technical alignment. resources. This is mainly addressed in MDG 7 (Target
However, the amounts of water necessary to reduce 7a: Integrate sustainable natural resource strategies
water supply deficits are in many cases available. In in national policies). This target can be interpreted as
addition, the use of domestic water is not necessarily seeking to ensure sustainable use and safeguarding of
consumptive, as the water can be cleaned and re-used. water resources. Such safeguarding could include the
Quantifying minimum water requirements to meet basic management of water for other uses, for example, for
human needs has resulted in vastly disparate estimates. ecosystem services, including provision of minimal
Annual per capita water needs range between 18 m3 and environmental flows necessary for maintenance of
49 m3, suggesting that approximately 0.1 to 0.3 km3 is aquatic organisms and their habitats. Accounting for the
required for basic water consumption, sanitation and provision of minimum environmental flows in major
societal uses by the global population. It is important to river basins suggests that water stress is even more
note that water for domestic, public and commercial use imminent than when estimated based on renewable
in many cases is returned to stream flow locally. Return water resources solely for human use (Smakthin et al.,
flows are reduced by consumptive losses, and often 2004; Fig. 2.4). These estimates suggest that, already,
result in diminished water quality, increased health risks 1.1 billion people are living in severely water stressed
amongst downstream users and degraded habitats. basins (0.9<Water Stress Index<1), and an additional
Relatively larger amounts of water are used to generate 700 million people live in moderately stressed river
the ecosystem services needed to ensure provisioning basins (0.6<Water Stress Index<0.9). Clearly, further
of basic supplies of food, fodder and fibres. Just consumptive use of water or increased pollution may
to meet the food requirements of a balanced diet, seriously affect ecosystem health, as well as human
approximately 1,300-1,800 m3 of water per person are well-being and potential for development.
consumed per year. This translates to 8,800-12,200 km3
for a world population of 6.7 billion in 2008/2009. The 2.3 Rainwater harvesting: what is it?
water used for food production, whether irrigated or
rainfed, is consumptive; i.e., at a local site, water will
be incorporated into foodstuffs, evaporated from the Definition and typology of rainwater
land surface or otherwise non-retrievable for further harvesting systems
use downstream. In comparison with amounts of water Rainwater harvesting consists of a wide range of
needed for domestic, public and commercial purposes, technologies used to collect, store and provide water
the projected needs for additional water to meet with the particular aim of meeting demand for water by
MDG target on hunger (MDG 1C) suggest additional humans and/or human activities (Fig. 2.5 cf. Malesu et
withdrawals of water for both rainfed and irrigated al., 2005; Ngigi, 2003; SIWI, 2001).
agriculture to meet the target through 2015. Today,

9


Table 2.2: The Millennium Development Goals (UN MDG, 2009) and the role of rainwater harvesting

Millennium Development
Role of rainwater harvesting Relevance
Goal
can act as an entry point to improve agricultural production, regenerate
1. End poverty and hunger degraded landscapes and supply water for small horticulture and livestock Primary
can improve incomes and food security
can reduce time devoted to tedious water fetching activities, enabling more time
2. Universal education Secondary
for schooling
interventions have been shown to improve gender equality and income group
equity by reducing the time spent by women gathering water for domestic pur-
3. Gender equality poses Primary
provides water so that girls can attend school even during theirr menstrual
cycles, thus increasing school attendance
contributes to better domestic water supply and improves sanitation reduc-
4. Child health ing the incidence of water borne diseases which are the major cause of deaths Primary
among the under fives
can supply better quality domestic water, which helps suppress diarrhoea etc.
5. Maternal health Secondary
can release time from tedious water fetching activities
6. Combat HIV/AIDS no direct linkages Secondary
interventions provide fresh water for humans and livestock
can regenerate ecosystem productivity and suppress degradation of services by
7. Environmental sustain-
soil erosion and flooding Primary
ability
rainwater harvesting can improve environmental flows by increasing base flow
where groundwater is recharged
8. Global partnership rainwater management is part of IWRM which is transnational issue Secondary

These technologies can be divided into two main areas rainwater harvesting systems are often identical to a
depending on source of water collected; namely, the range of soil conservation measures, such as terracing,
in situ and the ex situ types of rainwater harvesting, pitting, conservation tillage practices, commonly
respectively. In essence, in situ rainwater harvesting implemented to counter soil erosion. Thus, harvesting
technologies are soil management strategies that rainwater by increasing soil infiltration using in situ
enhance rainfall infiltration and reduce surface runoff. technologies also counteracts soil loss from the farmed
The in situ systems have a relatively small rainwater fields or forested areas. In situ rainwater harvesting
harvesting catchment typically no greater than 5-10 often serves primarily to recharge soil water for crop
m from point of water infiltration into the soil. The and other vegetation growth in the landscape. The water
rainwater capture area is within the field where the crop can also be used for other purposes, including livestock
is grown (or point of water infiltration). In situ systems and domestic supplies if it serves to recharge shallow
are also characterised by the soil being the storage groundwater aquifers and/or supply other water flows
medium for the water. This has two principal effects. in the landscape.
Firstly, it is difficult to control outtake of the water over
time. Normally soil moisture storage for crop uptake The ex situ systems are defined as systems which
is 5-60 days, depending on vegetation type, root depth have rainwater harvesting capture areas external to
and temperatures in soil and overlying atmosphere. the point of water storage. The rainwater capture area
Secondly, the outtake in space is determined by the varies from being a natural soil surface with a limited
soil medium characteristics, including slope. Due to infiltration capacity, to an artificial surface with low or
gradients and sub-surface conditions, the harvested no infiltration capacity. Commonly used impermeable
water can act as recharge for more distant water sources surfaces are rooftops, roads and pavements, which can
in the landscape, including groundwater, natural water generate substantial amounts of water and which can
ways and wetlands, and shallow wells. The in situ be fairly easily collected and stored for different uses.

10

Figure 2.3: The additional required water input needed to meet the Millennium Development Goal on
halving hunger 2015, and projections of water needed for eradicating hunger globally in 2050 (SEI, 2005).

Figure 2.4: Water stressed areas of the world accounting for environmental flows in river basins. Values
of the Water Stress Index 0.6<WSI<1 indicates potentially major impact on ecosystem services if further
withdrawals are made Smakthin et al., 2004

As the storage systems of ex situ systems often are The wide variety of rainwater harvesting technologies
wells, dams, ponds or cisterns, water can be abstracted and end uses of the water also indicates the dynamic
easily for multiple uses including for crops and other and flexible dimensions of rainwater harvesting
vegetation as irrigation water, or for domestic, public and systems. They also reflect the multiple end uses of the
commercial uses through centralised or decentralised water collected for our benefit, including agriculture
distribution systems. By collecting and storing water and landscape management, domestic, public and
in dams, tanks, and cisterns the storage time is more commercial water supply, as well as livestock watering,
dependent on the size of capture area, size of storage aquaculture and maintaining aesthetic values.
unit and rate of outtake rather than residence time and
flow gradient through the soil.

11


Current and potential implementation of systems for irrigation purposes as it differentiates
rainwater harvesting systems between surface water and groundwater, which does
There is much historical evidence of rainwater not allow the separation of shallow groundwater from
harvesting being an important factor in community deep groundwater, nor surface water withdrawn from
development since the beginning of human settlements. ‘blue’ water sources (lakes, water ways, large dams)
Many cultures have developed their societies with from smaller scale systems. The recent assessment
the primary management of water resources as a of irrigated and rainfed land, completed in the
corner stone, developing more sophisticated ways of Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in
supplying water both for consumption and agriculture. Agriculture (CA, 2007), also did not differentiate areas
Rainwater harvesting structures using cisterns are dated under rainwater harvested water supply from areas under
as early as 3000 BC in the Middle East. A more in-depth other types of water supply for irrigation. This lack of
description of ancient rainwater harvesting in India global information on where and how much rainwater
has been summarised by the Centre for Science and harvesting is currently in use makes it impossible to
Environment, India (Agarwal and Narain, 2005). say how many people actually benefit from rainwater
harvesting today. It also becomes challenging to
At the global level, there is no comprehensive summarize the global and/or regional benefits and costs
assessment of the extent of implementation of rainwater in specific locations, countries or regions of rainwater
harvesting technologies for specific uses. Nor is there harvesting for human well-being or ecosystem impacts
any summarized information on how much land is arising from rainwater harvesting.
currently under any type of in situ rainwater harvesting.
For the specific application of conservation tillage,
as no tillage agriculture, national statistics have been
aggregated by Hobbs et al. (2008). Their information
suggests that, globally, only a small fraction of the land
surface, amounting to about 95 million hectares, is
currently under conservation or no–till agriculture.

For irrigation and conservation tillage, the AQUASTAT
data base (FAO, 2009) holds data for a selected number
of countries. Unfortunately, the information on irrigation
cannot directly be associated with rainwater harvesting

Figure 2.5: Schematic of rainwater harvesting technologies based on source of water and water storage
type Modified after SIWI, 2001

12

References of water, energy and sanitation. Document prepared
AQUASTAT. 2009. AQUATSTAT online. FAO, Rome, for the UN World Summit, Sept 14, 2005, New York.
http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/dbase/index. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm http://
stm www.sei.se/mdg.htm
Barron, J., Noel, S. et al. 2008. Agricultural water SIWI. 2001. Water harvesting for upgrading rainfed
management in smallholder farming systems: the agriculture: Problem analysis and research needs.
value of soft components in meso-scale interventions. SIWI Report 11, Stockholm ( 101p)
SEI Project Report, Stockholm Environment Smakthin, V.U., Revenga, C., Döll, P. 2004. Taking into
Institute, Stockholm (38 p) account environmental water requirements in global-
Agarwal A.,and S. Narain . 2005. Dying wisdom: scale water resources assessments. Research Report
Rise, fall and potential of India’s traditional water of the CGIAR Comprehensive Assessment of Water
harvesting systems 4th edition. . Eds., State of Indias Management in Agriculture. No. 2, International
Environment, a citizens’ report 4, Centre for Science Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka,
and Environment, New Delhi, (404 pp) 24 pp
GEO4. 2007. Global Environmental Outlook 4: United Nations Millennium Development Goal
Environment for development. United Nations Indicators (UN MDG). 2009. Official web site for
Environment Programme, Nairobi/ Progress Press, monitoring MDG indicators. http://unstats.un.org/
Malta unsd/mdg/Default.aspx Last accessed January 2009
Hobbs, P., Sayre, K., Gupta,R. 2008. The role of UN Millennium Declaration, 2000. Resolution adopted
conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. by the General Assembly (A/RES/55/2) 18/09/2000
Phil Trans R. Soc. B 363:543-555 World Resources Institute (WRI) with United
Joshi, P.K., Jha, A. K., Wani, S.P., Joshi, Laxmi and Nations Development Programme, United Nations
Shiyani, R. L. 2005. Meta-analysis to assess impact Environment Programme, World Bank. 2005. The
of watershed program and people’s participation. Wealth of the Poor: Managing Ecosystems to Fight
Comprehensive Assessment Research Report 8. Poverty. Washington D.C. , WRI
Comprehensive Assessment Secretariat Colombo, World Resources Institute (WRI) with United
Sri Lanka. Nations Development Programme, United Nations
Kerr, J.M., 2002b. Watershed development projects in Environment Programme, World Bank. 2008. World
India: an evaluation. Research Report 127,. IFPRI, Resources 2008: Roots of Resilience - Growing the
Washington, DC. Wealth of the Poor. Washington D.C. WRI
Malesu, M, Oduor, A.R., Odhiambo, O.J. eds.
2008. Green water management handbook: rainwater
harvesting for agricultural production and ecological
sustainability Nairobi, Kenya : World Agroforestry
Centre ICRAF 229p.
Millennium Ecosystems Assessment (MA). 2005.
Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island
Press, Washington D.C.
Millennium Ecosystems Assessment (MA). Ecosystems
and human well-being: Current states and trends
Chapter 5. Ecosystem conditions and human well-
being.(Eds. Hassan, Scholes and Ash), Island Press,
Washington D.C.
Poverty-Environment Partnership (PEP). 2006. Linking
poverty reduction and water management. UNEP
–SEI publication for the Poverty-Environment
Partnership, http://www.povertyenvironment.net/
pep/
SEI, 2005. Sustainable pathways to attain the
millennium development goals - assessing the role

13


CHAPTER 3

Rainwater harvesting for management of watershed
ecosystems
Main author: Luisa Cortesi, Eklavya Prasad, Megh Pyne Abhiyan, Bihar, India

Contributing authors: Mogens Dyhr-Nielsen, UNEP-DHI Collaborating Center, Hørsholm,
Denmark

3.1 The role of watershed
management to address ecosystem approach seeks to ensure human well-being and progress
services toward sustainable development through improved
ecosystem services—including food, fresh water, fuel
wood, and fiber. Changes in availability of all these
Watershed management and development refers to ecosystem services can profoundly affect aspects of
the conservation, regeneration and the judicious use human well-being — ranging from the rate of economic
of the natural (land, water, plants, and animals) and growth and level of health and livelihood security to the
human habitat within a shared ecosystem (geological- prevalence and persistence of poverty. The framework
hydrological-aquatic and ecological) located within a of watershed management acknowledges the dynamic
common drainage system. Over the years, watershed interrelationship between people and ecosystems.
management has come to be seen as the initiation of To bring about a positive change in the ecosystem
rural development processes in arid and semi arid areas, services of the local habitat, the watershed management
in particular in rainfed ecosystems – combining projects approach deals with people and ecosystem in a holistic
for ecological sustainability with those for socio- and inter-disciplinary way.
economic development. Theoretically, it attempts to
integrate sectors such as water management, agriculture, The water management component of watershed
forestry, wasteland development, off-farm livelihood management in rainfed areas largely depends on
development, etc., and to establish a foundation for rural rainwater to initiate the local development processes.
development. The approach aims to be flexible enough Thus, the aim of this chapter is to highlight some of the
to be adapted to varying sociological, hydrological and critical issues facing rainwater harvesting in watershed
ecological conditions (Joy et al., 2006). Apart from the management, against the backdrop of human and
purely environmental concerns, i.e., restoring ecosystem ecosystem well-being.
functions, the watershed framework often focuses on
livelihood improvements, poverty alleviation and a
3.2 Potential of rainwater harvesting
general increase in human well-being.
in watershed ecosystem services and
human well-being
Watershed management is a strategy which responds to
the challenges posed by a rainfed agro-ecosystem and Watersheds consist of a complex pattern of various
human demands. Typically these challenges include ecosystems (forests, farmland, wetlands, soils, etc)
water scarcity, rapid depletion of the ground water table which provide a number of important goods and
and fragile ecosystems, land degradation due to soil services for human well-being. Examples are ample and
erosion by wind and water, low rainwater use efficiency, safe water supply from rivers and groundwater, crops,
high population pressure, acute fodder shortage and fish, fuel and fibres, as well as flood and erosion control.
poor livestock productivity, mismanagement of water Rainwater is, by itself, an important input factor for
sources, and lack of assured and remunerative livelihood healthy and productive ecosystems.
opportunities. Therefore, the watershed management

14

Rainwater harvesting in the context of a watershed substantial lands with water-saving crops like millet
means collecting runoff from within a watershed area, and maize. Although detractors highlight the variability
storing it, and employing it for different purposes. of rainfall and potential effect of heavy harvesting on
Runoff collection is generally distinguished as in downstream water resources during drought years, the
situ management, when the water is collected within resonance of this argument is strong. Rainfall can cover
the area of harvesting, and ex situ when it is diverted basic human needs in dry areas in a decentralized and
outside of the harvesting area. The storage is of crucial sustainable way and thus reduce pressures on pressures
importance: for in situ rainwater harvesting the soil acts of fragile groundwater reserves. These estimates prove
as the storage, whereas for ex situ rainwater harvesting that the potential of rainwater harvesting is large and
the reservoir can be natural or artificial, where natural that there is little reason why a village, region, or a
generally means groundwater recharge, and artificial country has to experience water problems, if they
means surface/subsurface tanks and small dams. The have land and rains. However, one of the conditions of
differentiation between the two is often minor, as water sustainable watershed management is to recognise so-
collection structures are generally placed in a systematic called negative externalities. In this case the negative
relation with each other; hence, the runoff from certain externality would be the effects of rainwater harvesting
structures may be a source of recharge for others. For on downstream water availability. Runoff out of
example, the construction of anicuts (small dams) at the watershed may be considered as a waste from a
frequent intervals in seasonal rivers leads to increased local point of view, but it may be a key resource for
groundwater recharge. Rainwater harvesting in a surface withdrawals or recharge of groundwater for
watershed context has a role and an impact on several downstream users (Ruf, 2006). For example, the Sardar
aspects of ecosystems and human well-being. This Patel Participatory Water Conservation programme was
section will present a few of them, through examples launched by the government of Gujarat in Saurashtra
and case studies. and north Gujarat in 1999, and involved the building of
check dams in local streams, and nallas (drains). As the
Rainwater harvesting impacts on downstream government of India officially claimed in 2007, nearly
flows? 54,000 check dams were built in Saurashtra and north
Amongst the proponents of rainwater harvesting, the Gujarat with the involvement of local communities.
argument in favour of its potential to drought-proof India However, some caution has been raised, as this large
has developed so far as to prove that, if half of rainfall and fast expansion of water har esting potentially can
v
is captured, every village in India can meet its own affect the ecology of Saurashtra region (Kumar et al.,
domestic water needs (Agarwal, 2001). The strategy for 2008).
drought proofing would be to ensure that every village
captures all of the runoff from the rain falling over its Decentralized approach may give access to
entire land and the associated government revenue and more water sources
forest lands, especially during years when the rainfall Given the fact that rainfall is unevenly distributed
is normal, and stores it in tanks or ponds or uses it to between years, as well as within rainy seasons, storing
recharge depleted groundwater reserves. It would then rainwater is a key component of water management. The
have enough water in its tanks or in its wells to cultivate water can be stored in storages of different construction

Checkdam in village of Dotad Jhabua

15


more water than one larger dam with a catchment of
10 ha. However, critics have suggested that the benefits
of smaller rainwater harvesting systems versus large
scale downstream implementation is mostly an effect
of different scale and project implementation, and lack
of consideration of (negative) externalities (Batchelor
et al., 2003). There is scientific evidence that even
withdrawal of water by rainwater harvesting can have
depleting effects, if the water is for consumptive uses
such as irrigation. Evapotranspiration of plants (crops,
trees, other vegetation) is an absolute loss of water,
which potentially can affect downstream flows of water
if used upstream excessively.

Increasing infiltration and groundwater
recharge
Groundwater recharge in watershed management
can be induced through different structures; for
Check dam Prasad instance, through dug shallow wells and percolation
tanks. The estimated number of dug shallow wells
and dimensions; for example, large reservoirs with in varying formations and situations in Rajasthan is
large catchments and small tanks and ponds with small about 83,000 wells, with potential new nadis (village
catchments, or use of natural or artificial groundwater ponds) estimated at 14,500. The existing nadis and the
recharge to store water in the soil. ones to be built may contribute 360-680 million m3
of groundwater replenishment annually. Percolation
There is evidence to show that village-scale rainwater tanks alternatively are another recharge structure
harvesting will yield much more water for consumptive which is generally constructed on small streams and
use than large or medium dams, making the latter a used for collecting the surface runoff. Under favorable
wasteful way of providing water, especially in dry hydro-geological conditions, percolation rates may be
areas. In the Negev desert where rainfall is only 105 increased by constructing recharge (intake) wells within
mm annually, it was found that more water is collected percolation tanks. According to studies conducted on
if the land is broken up into many small catchments, artificial recharge, the percolation tanks constructed in
as opposed to a single large catchment (Agarwal, hard rock and alluvial formations in the Pali district of
2001). This is because small watersheds provide an Rajasthan had a percolation rate of 14 to 52 mm/day.
amount of harvested water per hectare which is much Percolation accounted for 65-89% of the loss whereas
higher than that collected over large watersheds, as the evaporation loss was only 11-35% of the stored
evaporation and loss of water from small puddles and water. The results also indicated that the tanks in a
depressions is avoided. As much as 75% of the water hard rock area contained water for 3-4 months after
that could be collected in a small catchment is lost at the the receding of the monsoon. Percolation tanks have
larger scale. It is important to recognize that the non- been of greater benefit in recharging groundwater in
harvested water does not necessarily go to waste, as it the neighboring Gujarat state. There is a huge potential
is returned to the water cycle from the landscape (Ruf, to adopt this technology in western Rajasthan as well,
1998). Several other studies conducted by the Central where groundwater depletion rates are very high.
Soil and Water Conservation Research Institute in Agra, Thus, percolation tanks hold great promise for drought
Bellary and Kota, and another study conducted in the mitigation in regions having impermeable strata beneath
high rainfall region of Shillong, have all found that a sandy profile, with limited water holding capacity but
smaller watersheds yield higher amounts of water per high percolation rates.
hectare of catchment area. To put it simply, this means
that in a drought-prone area where water is scarce, 10 However, the effectiveness of groundwater recharge
tiny dams, each with a catchment of 1 ha, will collect in any area depends on the technical efficiency of

16

recharging groundwater, the storage potential of the area increased by 34%, while the cropping intensity
aquifers which are being recharged, and the dynamics increased by 64%. Such an impressive increase in the
of interaction between groundwater and surface water cropping intensity was not achieved in many surface
(Kumar et al., 2008). irrigated areas in the country (Sreedevi et al., 2006).

Reducing soil erosion Action for Social Advancement’s (ASA) work in
Rainfed areas are also confronted with problems of Madhya Pradesh, India, provides an example of
land degradation through soil erosion. Watershed how the increased volume of rainfall infiltration and
management interventions through water harvesting surface storage has resulted in additional irrigated area,
are often synonymous with soil and water conservation. contributing to increased crop output as well as cash
They act both to harvest rainfall and to conserve soil crop production. The improved water availability in the
and water, as a mean of increasing farm productivity. soil, and irrigation supply, has enabled farmers to grow
The available evidence reveals that soil loss is reduced a second crop during the winter season, after the usual
by about 0.82 tons per ha per year due to interventions monsoon season (Table 3.1). The local cropping pattern
in the watershed in India (Joshi et al., 2005). has changed, and at present the farmers have started
growing wheat during the winter, and rice and soybeans
The consequence of these soil conservation activities during the monsoon. As part of land development
also is the reduction of siltation of downstream tanks and activities, several farmers have built small field bunds
reservoirs that in turn reduce the need for maintenance. (in Hindi talais) to retain water in the fields that are
An example is provided by a comprehensive assessment flooded during the monsoon to grow a rice crop, for
of the Rajasamadhiyala watershed, Gujarat, India, wheat production during the subsequent dry season.
conducted to assess the on-site impact of a watershed
management program as well as off-site impacts on Improving food security and economic
two downstream watersheds. Inspection of the 40 security
year old check dam in the downstream portion of the Rainwater harvesting can be instrumental to
Rajasamadhiyala watershed, showed that, two years decentralized water supplies and local food security.
after the check dams construction upstream, the check Local food security is as important as national food
dam downstream was completely free from siltation security. It has been proven that the overall increase in
whereas previously it had silted up every 2 years crop output, mainly from the second crop, and from the
(Sreedevi et al., 2006). establishment of homestead (kitchen) gardens, has had
an impact upon the amount of food available for domestic
Intensification of crop production through consumption (Joshi et al., 2005). When rainwater
rainwater harvesting harvesting at the household or community level enables
Reduction of surface runoff was used to augment both rainfed farms to access a source of supplementary
surface and shallow groundwater reserves through irrigation, the economic security also improves.
in situ rain water harvesting interventions. This had According to farmers in the ASA implementation area
a direct benefit by expanding the irrigated area and in Madhya Pradesh (Pastakia, 2008), the visible signs
increasing cropping intensity. On average, the irrigated of improved economic security are increased incomes

Crop irrigated through dug wells Prasad

17


Dug wells recharged by in situ water harvesting Prasad

from the sale of marketable agricultural surpluses, that The ASA case study provides an interesting example
typically has led to a reduction in dependency and debt, of positive synergies between improved social welfare
to a decrease in the reliance on moneylenders, and to and improved ecological benefits enabled by rainwater
an increase in savings and investment in new assets harvesting in watershed management. Migration is
(primarily agriculture related assets) or improvement in integral to the tribal lifestyle in Jhabua district, Madhya
existing assets. Pradesh, as during the summer months the adult male
population migrates to Gujarat to become part of the
As the ASA case study highlights, the household construction labour force. However, an independent
“hungry” period (related to a lack of food or funds) assessment has shown that the area within the watershed
on average comprised 2-3 months, primarily from management project is currently witnessing a reduction
June-August. Currently, there is sufficient food for in the migration of family members (primarily sons)
consumption either produced by the household itself or and/or in the length of the migration period, due to
through a village level share arrangement. The second guaranteed work, income and food security from
crop also has resulted in a significant financial saving to enhanced agricultural production. The migration period
households through reduced staple food expenses and has come down from 6-8 months to around 4 months.
less debit repayment.
Other effects relate to both social and ecological aspects
Additional potential impacts on human of the watershed management interventions:
welfare
There are additional impacts of watershed management • Changes in food consumption habits, particularly
that may or may not have substantial effects on the the consumption of more vegetables; however, no
overall outcomes. in-depth assessment of the ramifications of this

Table 3.1: Change in typical cropping pattern, ASA , Madhya Pradesh

Monsoon Winter

maize, pigeon peas, lentils, groundnuts,
Before irrigation source pigeon peas, maize, wheat
black gram, sorghum

rice, soybeans, maize, pigeon peas ,lentils,
After irrigation source wheat, maize, pigeon peas, vegetables
groundnuts

18

(for instance on nutritional levels or incidence of 3.3 Case studies with rainwater
harvesting as entry point in
malnutrition) has been carried out in the areas.
watershed management
• Rainwater harvesting has the potential to mobilize
and involve communities in securing access to Small river basin approach in watersheds,
water issues, building an effective structure can central west India
be a start for a process of self-management in Action for Social Advancement (ASA) is a non-
village communities, if each step is the result of a governmental organization based in Madhya Pradesh
cooperative social process that enhances the ability in Central West India (Appendix II: case 3.1). The
of a community to work in cooperation (Aarwal, organization’s work focuses on improving the living
2001) environment and livelihood security of the local tribal
communities. In 1996, ASA worked with 42 tribal
• Rainwater harvesting can help establish a culture villages (nearly 25,000 people) with a land area of
of natural conservation and human synergetic nearly 20,000 hectares in Jobat, one of the sub-districts
existence in the environment amongst different of Jhabua district in Madhya Pradesh, to carry out
sectors of the society watershed work at the small river basin level. ASA was
keen to adopt a river basin approach instead of using
• Rainwater harvesting operates as an effective tool the conventional watershed strategy, because their
for addressing the problems of ‘ecological poverty’, previous experiences suggested that working on a few
as without water the process of ecological poverty micro-watersheds within a river basin did not yield the
cannot be reversed expected outputs, as the micro-watershed interventions
did not benefit of the greater basin water resources and
• A decentralized water conservation and management ecosystem services.
system may help in ensuring local food security
and substituting for external/centralized water In order to maximize the impact at the river basin level,
supply mechanisms within a decentralized system ASA focused on the following activities:
that preserves local regulations
• Land development It was considered fundamental
• Decentralised water supplies using rainwater for enhancing agricultural productivity to check the
harvesting technologies can lessen reliance on soil erosion and increase the infilration of rainfall
upstream land managers by downstream water
users, both in terms of water quantity and/or • Water resources development- With the intention of
quality increasing the sub-surface and ground water flows
and to ensure their continuity throughout the year
• Rainwater harvesting can serve to remediate by increasing the storage of surface water using
impacts on environmental flows in natural rivers rainwater harvesting structures, ASA implemented
by contributing to sustainable flows during dry water storage, percolation tanks and masonry check
periods. dams

Specific attention should be given to the impact of • Agriculture intensification and diversification –
rainwater harvesting and watershed management, or ASA worked on promoting appropriate farming
even water management in general, on gender issues. technologies to the farmers and allowing farmers to
While the ASA case study presents a reflection on test and adopt suitable technologies to build further
gender, there are very few assessments conducted over a on the regenerated resources. Diversification of
long term, or after a few years from the implementation crops (for instance, from cereal crop to vegetables
of the specific intervention of watershed management, or dry land horticulture) was another important
assessing long-term impacts on both water flows and strategy for optimizing farm productivity
ecosystem services, as well as on the social, gender and
economic impacts (Coles and Wallace, 2005). • Build and promote people’s institutions around
the natural resource interventions, both in terms of

19


water users’ groups and watershed committees, as 1960s-early 1970s, this increased demand was met by
well as creating institutional mechanisms for the pumping groundwater from the aquifers of the Giber
supply of agricultural credit. basin, which soon resulted in negative impacts on the
environmental flows and aquatic ecosystems in the area.
The impact of ASA’s watershed management at the First of all, the depletion of the groundwater was not
river basin level can be assessed through its influence matched by the natural recharge, making the pumping
on human and ecosystem well-being. In general the of water unsustainable. Secondly, as a consequence, the
subsurface flow of water has improved significantly, springs feeding the Giber basin, an ecosystem targeted
indicated by the increased flows in the streams and for provision of recreational services, were running
rivers in the entire basin. Hand pumps and dug wells dry, particularly in the summer, when recreational
have become permanent, while many of the dry dug- use was high. Moreover, the low-flow discharge of
wells have been revived. Evidence of increased base the river consisted mainly of treated waste water
flow can be confirmed by the fact that in last three years discharges from the municipal treatment plants in the
private investments have been directed towards shallow basin, with concomitant enrichment concerns. These
dug-wells. impacts initiated considerable political concern, as the
environmental movement was growing and the demand
Productivity has improved due to soil retention, double for recreational areas for use by the urban population
cropping, and reclamation of waste land. Agricultural became an important electoral issue.
extension has encouraged diversification of crops such
as the introduction of improved varieties, vegetable Despite demand management enforcement, which was
cultivation, and small and medium drainage system able to decrease the water use from 350 litres/day/person
converted into paddy fields. The net biomass at the in 1970 to less than 200 litres/day/person in 2005, the
household level has increased for consumption, for sale authority realized that rainwater harvesting could be
and for livesock. Significant income has been added supportive in terms of maintaining the ecosystem and
to the farms through the implementation of dug wells, the related services it provides. In fact, the Giber basin
small group lift irrigation systems, orchards, vegetable contains several flood retention reservoirs, constructed
gardens, and use of improved seeds and technologies in accordance with municipal regulations for storm
like vermi composting. An unexpected positive trend is water control, one of which was found to be feasible
the reduced migration to cities, particularly in villages for storing rainwater for later controlled release, as a
where the greatest work effort has been directed toward supplement to the natural flow.
the areas land and water resources development.
The increased access and institutional capacity of To conclude, the mechanism for supporting the
communities to manage agricultural credits has resulted environmental flows in the Giber basin was found
in more opportunity for regular financial, insurance and in rainwater harvesting through urban storm water
agricultural service companies. management. With limited investment and a change
in operational rules, the low flow of Giber basin could
As yet, women’s participation in the watershed be supported by harvested rainwater. This simple
management committees has been lacking. This and practical solution illustrates the potential of
has highlighted the need to integrate gender in the rainwater harvesting within a river basin as an area of
program. Currently the organization is at a crucial cross-sectoral convergence (involving nature, urban
point in designing a framework to integrate strong and stormwater management systems, and recreational use
active SHGs (Self Help Groups) into the watershed demands), within a basin, for human and ecosystem
management institutions. well-being. Specifically, the positive impacts of
rainwater harbesting on the ecosystem were increased
Rainwater harvesting and urban water river flow in the landscape, supporting and regulating the
supply in the Giber basin, related services of improved water quality, groundwater
Following significant population increases and housing recharge and an increased water flow downstream and
standard improvements, Århus, Denmark’s second in springs.
largest city, was challenged by increased water demand
and consumption (Appendix II: case 3.2). In the

20

The main impact of this intervention on human well- for developing a local modus operandi for achieving
being has been through the support of the related the desired watershed outcomes. Thus, although many
environmental services, which was even made concrete watershed interventions have enabled development,
by the inclusion of the basin in the EU network of water became the limiting resource and appropriate
protected areas NATURA2000 (Thomsen et al., 2004) steps had to be taken for its sustainable and continuous
use to support both improved human well-being and
The Karnataka Watershed development sustainable and productive ecosystem services.
project: emerging negative externalities
The Karnataka Watershed Development Project
3.4 Conclusion
(KAWAD) (Appendix II: case 3.3) is located in the
northern districts of the Karnataka state in the south Rainwater harvesting can be a vital intervention in the
of India. The northern part of the state experiences rehabilitation of ecosystem services for enhancing human
water scarcity. To address this concern, KAWAD has well-being in the context of watershed management.
been trying out different institutional mechanisms to Its appropriate application can influence changes in
identify the appropriate approach for resolving water the well-being of both human-oriented and ecosystem
use conflicts. services. The changes are triggered through synergies
across sectors; for instance, through interactions
It is acknowledged that watershed management creates between agricultural practices, rainwater recharge, soil
an enabling environment for human and ecosystem conservation and food security needs. However, it is
well-being, but occasionally it also is accompanied by important to recognize that the approach of harvesting
new challenges caused by the watershed management rainwater in watershed management, through major and
interventions. According to the water resource audit of minor schemes, has its own limitations, both in terms
the KAWAD, enhanced water resources in the project of appropriateness of the precise interventions, their
areas have led to the intensification of demand and techno-economic feasibility, and their practical method
competition for water for competing human uses. of implementation. Therefore, close monitoring of
Recently it was observed that the annual water use the impacts is required in environmental, economical,
was as high as the annual replenishment of surface and social and technical terms during all the phases of the
groundwater resources and that there has been increasing project cycle as well as after the end of the project.
conflict between the upstream and downstream water
user groups.

In addition, the watershed has also attracted criticism due
to its constricted and compartmentalized planning and
execution policies and practices. For instance, after the
implementation of KAWAD in the first half of 1999, it
was realized that the importance and inclusion of water-
related interventions, which mainly included check
dams and other rainwater harvesting structures, was
too exaggerated. These structures were inappropriate
considering the surface flows in the region, which,
prior to the watershed work, were already low. With the
construction of the water harvesting structures, this flow
was further reduced. The consequence was a new set of
problems in the region, such as depleted groundwater
levels, dry dug-wells, reduced domestic water supplies
during the summer and the drought period. A shift
in perspective from water development to water
management, which included demand management
and not only supply management, was a pre-requisite

21


References for Social Advancement, Bhopal and Paul Hamlyn
AA.VV.2003. Water Harvesting and Management Foundation, UK
2003, Practical guide series 6, Inter Cooperation and Ruf, T. 2006. La gestion participative de l’irrigation,
Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, compromis social ou précarité hydraulique ? Fausses
New Delhi apparences et vraies redistributions des pouvoirs
Agarwal, A.2001. Drought? Try Capturing the Rain, sur les eaux en général et sur les eaux agricoles en
Briefing paper for members of parliament and state particulier. Paper presented at “Colloque International
legislatures, Occasional Paper, Centre for Science Gevorev”, UVSQ.
and Environment, New Delhi Ruf, T. 1998. “Du passage d’une gestion par l’offre en
Batchelor C.H., Rama Mohan Rao M.S., Manohar eau à une gestion par la demande sociale: Ordre et
Rao S. 2003. Watershed development: A solution to désordre dans les questions d’irrigation et de conflits
part water storage in semi-arid India or part of the d’usage de l’eau”. Paper presented at “atelier 3 du
problem? Land Use and Water Resources Research IRD” November 1998. IRD, Montpellier
Vol.3 2003 (1-10), Karnataka. Sreedevi, T.K., Wani, S.P., Sudi, R., Patel, M.S., Jayesh,
Coles A., Wallace T. 2005. Gender, Water and T., Singh S.N., Shah, T. 2006. On-site and Off-site
Development. Berg Publishers: Oxford Impact of Watershed Development: A Case Study of
Dyhr-Nielsen, M. 2009. A tale of two cities: Meeting Rajasamadhiyala, Gujarat, India. Global Theme on
urban water demands through sustainable Agroecosystems Report No. 20, Pantacheru, Andhra
groundwater management. In: Robert Lenton et al.: Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute
IWRM in Practice, Earthscan, London, (in press). for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
Geddes J.C. 2007. Evaluation of ASA’s Watershed Thomsen, R., V.H. Søndergaard K.I Jørgensen. 2004.
Development work in selected villages in Jhabua Hydrogeological mapping as a basis for establishing
district, Madhya Pradesh, Action for Social site-specific protection zones in Denmark.
Advancement (ASA), Mumbai Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 12, pp550-562
Mondal Ashis. 2005. Small River Basin Approach in
Watersheds in Central West India, Action for Social
Advancement, Bhopal
Malviya, S., Gettings, S. 2007. Durable Livelihood
Assets: Impact Assessment of ASA’s Dug Wells
Programme, Action for Social Advancement,
Bhopal
Joshi, P. K.., Jha, A. K., Wani, S.P., Joshi, Laxmi,
Shiyani, R. L. 2005. Meta-analysis to assess impact
of watershed program and people’s participation.
Comprehensive Assessment Research Report 8.
Colombo, Sri Lanka: Comprehensive Assessment
Secretariat.
Joy K.J., Shah A., Paranjape S., Badiger S., Lele S.
2006. Reorienting the Watershed Development
Programme in India, Occasional Paper, Forum for
Watershed Research and Policy Dialogue
Kumar, M.D., Patel A., Ravindranath R., Singh O.P.
2008. Chasing a Mirage: Water Harvesting and
Artificial Recharge in Naturally Water-Scarce
Regions, in Economical and Political Weekly, August
30, 2008
Pastakia, A. 2008. Promotion of Micro finance
initiatives in Jhabua district of Madhya Pradesh in
central-west India, An Evaluation Study, Action

22

CHAPTER 4

Rainwater harvesting in the management of agro-eco
systems

Main author: Bharat Sharma, International Water Management Institute, New Delhi, India

Farai Madziva, Harvest Ltd, Athi River, Kenya.
Filbert B. Rwehumbiza, Siza Tumbo, S.D, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania
Mohamed Bouitfirass, National Institute of Agronomic research (INRA), SETTAT, Morocco
Mohamed Boufaroua. M, l’Aménagement et de la conservation des terres agricoles (ACTA),
Tunis, Tunisie
Mohammed El Mourid, Centre International de Recherche Agricole dans les zones Sèches
(ICARDA), Tunis, Tunisie
Adouba ould Salem, A. Projet de développement pastoral et de gestion de parcours (PADEL),
République Islamique de Mauritanie

4.1 The role of rainfed farming for and Hine (2001) suggest, there is a 100% yield increase
ecosystem services and human well- potential in rainfed agriculture in developing countries,
being compared to only 10% for irrigated crops.
Development of agriculture is the main landuse change
that has affected and depleted many ecosystem services Rainfed agriculture produces, and will continue to
in favour of increased agricultural biomass production produce, the bulk of the world’s food. It is practised on
(MA, 2005). The soil and climate sets the parameters 80% of the world’s agricultural land area, and generates
for agro-ecosystems. Increasingly, the value of a healthy 65-70% of the world’s staple foods, but it also produces
soil system is recognised as a key ecosystem service the most food for poor communities in developing areas.
in sustaining agro-ecosystem production. Water flows In Sub-Saharan Africa more than 95% of the farmland
in the soil system depend upon two principal factors; is rainfed, while almost 90% in Latin America, 60% in
infiltration of rainfall, and water holding capacity of South Asia, 65% in East Asia and 75% in the Near East
the soil. Rainwater harvesting for crops is therefore and North Africa are rainfed. In India, 60% of water
closely related to soil system management; namely, the use in agriculture originates from directly infiltrated
actions taken to improve infiltration into the soil and to rainfall.
increase water holding capacity and fertility functions
in the soil. Low and variable productivity is the major cause of
poverty for 70% of the world’s poor inhabiting these
In the water management community, much attention lands. At the same time there is growing evidence that
has been devoted to irrigated agriculture, since it appears agriculture continues to play key role in economic
to be the major consumer of water, when compared development and poverty reduction in the rainfed
to water requirements for domestic and industrial regions. Increased effort is needed to upgrade rainfed
purposes. However, much less attention has been paid systems, from the point of view of improving soil
by water managers and investment institutions to the water capacity and fertility. More efficient rainwater
issues of rainfed agriculture. The distinctive features of harvesting systems have a great role to play, especially
rainfed agriculture in developing countries are that both in developing countries struggling to provide water and
productivity improvement and expansion have been affordable food.
slower in relation to irrigated agriculture. But as Pretty

23


Water security to ensure human well-being growth. Soil moisture storage reaches critical limits and
in rainfed farming systems causes crop damage, or even failure. Most rural poor
Yield gap analyses in tropical semi-arid and sub-humid in Asia, Africa and Latin America experience water
areas found farmers’ yield a factor of 2-4 times lower scarcity for agriculture, and consequentially poor yields
than optimally achievable yields, for major rainfed and compromised livelihoods, due to the lack of public,
crops. Grain yields fluctuate around 1-2 t/ha, compared private and individual investment in the provision of
to optimal yields of over 4-5 t/ha (Falkenmark and even small scale water infrastructure. Here adaptation
Rockstrom, 2000). The large yield gap between to rainfall variability is the greatest water challenge.
attainable yields and farmers’ practice, as well as
between attainable and potential yields, shows that Therefore, local harvesting of a small portion of
there is a large potential to improve yields in rainfed the rainwater in wet periods, utilising the same for
agriculture that remains to be tapped. supplemental/protective irrigation during devastating
dry spells, offers a promising solution in the fragile,
Rainfall is the crucial input factor in the rainfed rainfed regions of the world. As total rainfall is spread
production system. Its variation and uncertainty is over a few rainfall events of high intensity (about 100
high in areas of low rainfall and a major cause of low hours in whole season in semi-arid regions), in most
productivity and heightened distress among farmers. The rainfed regions in Asia and Africa much is lost to runoff
last decade, in particular, has witnessed serious distress, and evapotranspiration. It is important to capture and
even amongst the more enterprising, small and marginal convert a part of this into more productive use. The
farmers in the rainfed regions. They opted to replace storm runoff may either be diverted directly and spread
traditional low value cereals with high value ones (but on the fields, or collected in inexpensive water storage
ones more vulnerable to dry spells and droughts), and systems.
introduce intensive crops through borrowing but with
little success. Adverse meteorological conditions, long Water harvesting techniques may be catchment systems,
dry spells and droughts caused extended moisture stress collecting runoff from a larger area. They include
periods for crops, livestock and people. Such situations runoff farming, which involves collecting runoff from
occur over large parts of poor countries in Asia and sub- the hillsides and delivering it onto plain areas, and
Saharan Africa. Limited food productivity and poverty floodwater harvesting within a streambed using barriers
at the household level is a major contributing factor (check dams) to divert stream flow onto an adjacent area,
in the further degradation of ecosystems, including thus increasing infiltration of water into the soil. Micro-
deforestation, excessive abstraction of biomass, and catchment water harvesting methods are those in which
possibly landscape habitat destruction, with biodiversity the catchment area and the cropped area are distinct,
loss as a result. In particular, degraded soils with low but adjacent to each other. Establishing catchment
productivity can send the relationship between the systems often necessitates ecosystem rehabilitation and
ecosystem and human well-being into a downward conservation, in order to secure the runoff.
spiral, with diminishing yields, affecting farmers’
livelihoods, and reduced capacity to restore and enhance At the farm level, rooftop runoff collection may be
the soil system’s health to a more productive state. successfully used for gardening. At the field level, in
situ water harvesting methods focus on the storage
Constraints of rainfed agriculture systems capacity of the land surface and the soil. They include
and role of rainwater harvesting conservation tillage, field embankments, trenches, half-
In the most arid zones (< 300 mm/annum), absolute moon terraces and field terracing. Thus, the upper layers
water scarcity constitutes the major limiting factor of the soil form an important part of the ecosystem,
in water provision. But in the vast semi-arid and dry which act as a natural storage for rainfall. The infiltrated
sub-humid tropical regions, total seasonal rainfall rainfall has an important role in supporting soil fertility
is generally adequate to meet most needs and also to cycles as well as micro-flora and fauna in the soil.
significantly improve agricultural water productivity,
if it were evenly distributed. However, dry spells (or Generally, the amount of water made available through
monsoon breaks), with little or no rainfall, occur in rainwater harvesting is limited and has to be used most
most cropping seasons during critical stages of plant judiciously to alleviate water stress during critical

24

stages of crop growth. Supplemental irrigation is a key also improved livestock and moved towards keeping
strategy, so far underutilised, in unlocking rainfed yield large dairy animals (buffaloes, cows) rather than small
potentials. It is used on crops that can be grown using grazing animals (sheep, goats) (Bouma et al., 2006). In
rainfall alone, but provides a limited amount of water this regard, the World Bank notes that each 1% growth
during times of low/no rainfall. The use of supplemental in agricultural yield brings an estimated 0.5-0.7%
irrigation, to bridge dry spells, has the potential to reduction in rural poverty (World Bank, 2005) (Table
substantially increase yields by more than 100%. The 4.1). Thus water harvesting improves agricultural
existing evidence indicates that supplemental irrigation, productivity with more value added outputs and boosts
ranging from 50-200 mm/season (500-2000 m3/ha), is rural employment, both on and off the farm.
sufficient to alleviate yield-reducing dry spells in most
years, and thereby stabilise and optimise yield levels. In When on-farm productivity increases, thereby
addition, supplemental irrigation systems have shown a improving rural incomes and human well-being, other
further gain through improved water productivity; i.e., ecosystem services can improve too. This has been
through gains in absolute consumption of water for the especially obvious where in situ rainwater harvesting
same production of biomass. has been implemented to reduce soil erosion. Increased
farm productivity can reduce pressures on forestry and
Rainwater harvesting serves as catalyst to grazing, and thus increase habitats and biodiversity.
improve farm ecosystem services and farm
income Introducing rainwater harvesting to improve soil
Existing research and farm-level and regional ecosystem productivity in rainfed agriculture promises
development programs aimed at improvement of the large social, economic, and environmental paybacks,
rainfed systems have shown that proper development particularly in poverty reduction and economic
and use of the water harvesting system is the first entry- development. Rainwater harvesting presents a low-cost
point for success for most of these initiatives (Joshi approach for mediating dry spell impacts in rainfed
et al., 2005; Rockstrom et al., 2007). The benefits agriculture. Remarkable successes have in fact been
associated with all additional activities concerned with witnessed in poverty- stricken and drought prone areas
improved soil and land management, such as crop and in India and Africa. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the future of
pest and disease management; investments in fertilizers, over 90% rainfed farmers depends heavily on improved
machinery and other agricultural investments; and water security. In South Asia, about 70% of agriculture
development and access to markets, accrue to the field is rainfed and some good work has been done in the
or the region which has a guaranteed access to the water design and successful demonstration of a range of water
resource. harvesting structures, for both drinking water supply
and irrigation. In several other countries in the Middle
Rainwater harvesting and its application to achieving East, Latin America and South East Asia, rainwater
higher crop yields encourages farmers to add value harvesting is a traditional practice in certain regions,
and diversify their enterprises. In parts of Tanzania, but the transferability of these models and practices has
rainwater harvesting has enabled farmers in semi-arid so far been limited. One of the main problems is that the
areas to exploit rainfed farming by growing a marketable local institutions needed often are inconsistent with the
crop. Farmers upgraded from sorghum and millet to predominant governmental structures and institutional
rice or maize, with additional legume crops that exploit arrangements prevailing in these countries (Samra,
residual moisture in the field. Similarly, studies of the 2005).
Rajsamadhiyala watershed in Gujarat, India revealed
that public investment in rainwater harvesting enabled Investment in rainwater harvesting is important in
farmers to invest in wells, pump sets, drip and sprinkler meeting not only the Millennium Development Goals
irrigation systems and fertilisers and pest management (Table 4.1) on reducing hunger but also on reducing
(Wani et al., 2006). In addition, farmers in the developed poverty and ensuring environmental sustainability
watershed villages in Andhra Pradesh, India allocated a (Box-I, Sharma et al., 2008). A review of 311 case
greater area to vegetables and horticultural crops than studies on watershed programs in India, with rainwater
did the farmers in the surrounding villages, which harvesting and rainwater management as important
contributed to income stability and resilience. Farmers components, found that the mean cost-benefit ratio of

25


Table 4.1. Role of water harvesting in agriculture, in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (1, 3 and
7)

Millennium Development
Role of water harvesting in achieving the MDGs
Goals(MDG)

There is a close correlation between hunger, poverty and water: most hungry and poor
Goal 1. Eradicate extreme pov-
live in regions where water poses a particular constraint to food production. Water har-
erty and hunger
vesting helps to mitigate the hunger-poverty-water nexus. (Rockstrom et al., 2007)

a. Reduce by half the proportion
a. Ca 75% of water required to achieve the 2015 MDG hunger reduction target will
of people living on less than a
have to come from water investments in rainfed agriculture. (Molden , 2007)
dollar a day.

b. Small investments (providing 1,000 m3 of extra water per hectare per season) in sup-
b. Achieve full and productive
plemental irrigation combined with improved agronomic practices can more than dou-
employment and decent work for
ble yields and incomes in small-scale rainfed agriculture. Each 1% growth in agricul-
all, including women and young
tural yields brings about a 0.5%-0.7% reduction in the number of poor people. (World
people.
Bank, 2005)

Of the world’s poor, 70% live in rural areas and are often at the mercy of rainfall-based
c. Reduce by half the proportion sources of income. Upgrading rainwater management is a critical factor in increasing
of people who suffer from hunger. returns to labour and thus for poverty reduction. (Hatibu et al., 2006; Sharma et al.,
2008)

Increased efforts to promote home gardens, growing of vegetable and horticultural
crops and improved livestock and poultry management through rainwater harvesting
Goal 3. Promote gender equality contribute to income stability which benefits women and children. Diversified liveli-
and empower women hood options for women and youth increase resilience during drought years. (Joshi et
al., 2005; Sreedevi et al., 2006). It also provides better nutrition for women and chil-
dren.

Upgrading rainfed agriculture has substantial payoffs for society. Rainwater harvesting
Goal 7. Ensure environmental
based watershed programs generated large on-and off-farm employment opportunities,
sustainability
and conserved soil and water resources (Sharma et al., 2005).

a. Reduce biodiversity loss, Improved rainfed agriculture reduces the pressure on forests, grazing lands, wetlands
achieving by 2010, and a signifi- and other fragile ecosystems and helps to improve biodiversity. Better use of green
cant reduction in the rate of loss. water improves biodiversity on 80% of the land area (Bruce et al., 1999).

b. Reduce by half the proportion Rain water harvesting structures, especially based on rooftop rainwater harvesting is the
of people without sustainable most economical and surest way of providing water for drinking and sanitation even in
access to safe drinking water and the remotest areas. With small additional investment its safe use can be ensured (van
sanitation. Koppen et al., 2008).

26

such watershed programs was relatively high at 1:2.14 harvesting in improving agriculture, environment and
(Joshi et al., 2005). Rain water harvesting created human livelihoods. Some case studies, mentioned
new/additional sources of water and helped in the below, illustrate innovative structures for the provision
provision and regulation of the water supply systems. and regulation of water-related ecosystem services,
Poor management of rainwater in rainfed systems development of effective institutions and policies,
generates excessive runoff and floods, causing soil establishment of new ways of inclusive development,
erosion and poor yields. Investment that maximises improvement of degraded environments and securing
rainwater harvesting, both in situ and ex situ, helps to of livelihood benefits for individuals and communities.
minimise land degradation, while increasing the water Certain negative impacts on human well-being and
available for productive use. Investment is now needed ecosystem services, mentioned in the case studies
in water resource management, in smallholder rainfed and accompanying appendices, should also receive
farming systems, which adds additional freshwater due consideration when considering new rainwater
and improved soil storage capacity and productivity. harvesting programs.
A small investment (providing 50 to 200 mm of
extra water per hectare per season) for supplemental “Sukhomajri” – harvesting catchment runoff
irrigation, in combination with improved agronomic for the benefit of rural ecosystems and the
management, can more than double water productivity welfare of rural populations
and yields in small-scale rainfed agriculture. This will Sukhomajri is a small hamlet (59 families in the 1975,
release pressure on surface water or ground water for and 89 in the 1990, census surveys) with average land
irrigation. It will make more water available to sustain holdings of 0.57 ha, located in the Shiwalik foothills,
aquatic ecosystems, without compromising agricultural India. In 1975, the village was completely rainfed and
productivity. Increased rainwater infiltration can also had no external sources of water for domestic use,
artificially recharge the depleted groundwater aquifers in livestock watering and crop irrigation. Yields were
hard rock regions and in areas of intensive groundwater low and crop failures were common. Agriculture did
use. Governments in India and Pakistan have developed not provide adequate livelihood support for the people.
elaborate master plans for the artificial recharge of the Illicit cutting of trees and uncontrolled grazing resulted
aquifers through recharge wells, recharge shafts and in rapid denudation and erosion of hill slopes (80t/ha/
recharge ponds (Romani, 2005; Shah, 2008). year) which also seriously threatened the nearby lake.
An integrated watershed development programme, with
However, as also elaborated in Chapter 3, environmental a major emphasis on rain water harvesting, was then
and social concerns need to be given due consideration planned. The area was treated with a series of staggered
when implementing rain water harvesting projects. contour trenches on vulnerable slopes; stone, earthen
In basins with limited surplus supplies, rainwater and brushwood check dams in gullies; and graded
harvesting in the upstream areas may have a damaging stabilisers in the channels. A six metre high earthen
impact downstream and can cause serious community embankment pond with 1.8 ha-m storage to harvest
conflict. Also, when runoff is generated from a large rainwater from a 4.2 ha catchment was constructed in
area and concentrated in small storage structures, there 1976. Crop yields were doubled as a result of the use
is a potential danger of water quality degradation, of supplementary irrigation water and improved land
through introduction of agro-chemicals and other management practises. Livestock water needs and
impurities. Special investigations on water quality must domestic water requirements were satisfied for all the
be undertaken before using the harvested water for households.
recharge of underground aquifers.
This gave impetus to a watershed management
programme for the mutual benefit of the catchment and
4.2. Glimmers of hope: case studies of
the command area, in which it was possible to combine
rainwater harvesting
the interests of the people with the improvement of
Several government and private institutions, civil the hilly catchment ecosystems. As a result of these
society organisations and even committed individuals, interventions, vegetation began to appear in the
in different parts of the developing world, have catchment area and soil erosion was reduced by 98%,
demonstrated the impressive benefits of rainwater to about 1 t/ha/ year in a 5-year period. Later on, the

27


Box 4.I: Rainwater harvesting realising the potential of rainfed agriculture in India
India ranks first among the rainfed agricultural vide one critical irrigation application of 18.75 M
countries in terms of both extent (86 M ha) and value ha during a drought year and 22.75 M ha during a
of produce. The traditional subsistence farming sys- normal year. Water used in supplemental irrigation
tems have changed and presently farmers have lim- had the highest marginal productivity and increases
ited options. Farmers have started cultivating high in rainfed production above 50% were achievable.
value crops which require intensive use of inputs, More specifically, net benefits improved by about
most importantly life saving irrigation. Frequent oc- 3-times for rice, 4-times for pulses and 6-times for
currence of mid-season and terminal droughts of oilseeds. Droughts appear to have limited impact
1 to 3-weeks consecutive duration during the main when farmers are equipped with rainwater harvest-
cropping season are the dominant reasons for crop ing systems. Water harvesting and supplemental
(and investment) failures and low yields. Provision of irrigation was economically viable at the national
critical irrigation during this period has the potential level and would have limited impacts downstream
to improve the yields by 29 to 114 per cent for dif- during normal years. This decentralized and more
ferent crops. A detailed district and agro-ecoregion- equitable intervention targeted resource poor farm-
al level study, comprising 604 districts, showed that ers and has the potential to serve as an alterna-
on a potential (excluding very arid and wet areas) tive strategy to the proposed river linking and water
rainfed cropped area of 25 M ha, a rainfall surplus transfer projects.
of 9.97 M ha-m was available for harvesting. A small Source: Sharma et al. (2008)
part of this water (about 18%) was adequate to pro-

people themselves started protecting the forest and the of the project. Even after thirty years since the initial
grazing land, and the concept of ‘Social Fencing’ came rain water harvesting and additional interventions, the
into existence. However, it was soon realized that one village continues to meet its domestic and productive
check dam was insufficient to meet the needs of the water needs, has rejuvenated the grasslands, and enjoys
village. In the following years, three additional water much improved livelihoods through higher economic
harvesting earthen dams were constructed. These ponds benefits (Arya and Samra, 2001).
were sufficient to carry over the rainy season water for
the winter crops and produce good yields. Even during Rainwater harvesting for commercial
drought years (when the crops of the adjoining villages floriculture: Athi River Town, Kenya
did not produce any marketable yield) the stored water The horticultural farm (commercial rose cultivation)
was sufficient to provide one/two irrigations, and meet of Harvest Ltd. is situated along the banks of the Athi
the domestic and livestock water needs. River outside Nairobi, Kenya (Appendix II, Case 4.2).
The Athi is a perennial river but within the project area
The demonstration of irrigating fields with stored runoff it flows only for 5 months (January, February, March,
generated a tremendous enthusiasm among farmers. This November and December).
introduced a new concept of watershed management for
the mutual benefit of the catchment and the command Athi River Town and its catchment area have a bimodal
area. Additionally, erosion and sediment delivery from rainfall pattern. For the last 6 years the average rainfall
the catchment were considerably reduced. This had of 800 mm has dropped to an average of 500 mm. Such
been a major source of degradation and pollution to a significant drop (40%) directly affects food production
the adjoining ‘Sukhna Lake”- a source of water supply and the availability of clean water. Due to the proximity
and recreation for the neighbouring state capital city to the Athi catchment plains, there are high sodium
of Chandigarh. The entire management of the project (Na) levels in the soils and underground water. The
was handed over to a new village based institution - the groundwater has sodium levels as high as 450 ppm. The
“Hill Resource Management Society” (HRMS). The combination of poor soil quality and high sodium makes
Sukhomajri project indicated that people’s participation growing flowers in such soils challenging. A clean
had to be integrated into the planning and implementation source of water was necessary for any sustainable crop

28

production to take place. The solution was rainwater
harvesting, storage and usage. Harvest Ltd. invested in
water storage facilities to ensure that all rain water was
collected and stored safely. In total, Harvest Ltd. requires
on average about 300,000 m3 of water for irrigation per
year for the 30 ha farm. Rainwater harvesting contributes
60% of this total water requirement. The harvested
water reduces demand on other water extractions in the
landscape. It uses three types of rainwater harvesting
techniques; namely, rooftop, surface runoff and flood
flow water harvesting. 95% of all rooftop catchment
water is collected into reservoir.

Rainwater harvesting and conveyance in stone and Surface runoff is also collected in storm-drains and
concrete drains F Madziva stored in reservoirs. Flood flow water is pumped out
from the Athi River. This however, is not rainwater
harvesting and has serious consequences downstream.
Harvest Ltd. is able to pump these flood waters into
reservoirs for storage for use during the dry periods.
There are two big compacted earthen reservoirs having
a maximum capacity of 230,000 cubic meters.

The reservoirs can hold the water for a whole season
without losing much to percolation. Rainwater harvesting
and its storage would be an effective solution for both
commercial and subsistence farmers. If it were not for
rainwater harvesting, storage and good usage, Harvest
Ltd. would have had to sink four extra boreholes to
efficiently irrigate the 30 hectares of roses. By utilizing
rainwater, pressure is released on the landscape water
Rainwater harvesting reservoir at 90% capacity at resources, as well as on groundwater for ecosystem and
Harvest Ltd., Athi River Town F Madziva human uses.

Photo (left): Athi River - Dry (September 2006)
Photo (right): Athi River- Flowing (October 2008) F Madziva

29


Water harvesting for livestock: ‘charco dams’ kept close to the homestead, women were easily able to
at South Pare Mountains, Tanzania market the milk, and thus access this source of income
Livestock are an essential part of many smallhold, (semi- which was previously unavailable. Additionally, women
) subsistence farming systems. However, livestock also no longer had to walk long distances in search of water
need to consume large amounts of fresh water. The required for domestic chores. The charco dams have
case study of charco dams for livestock watering is also improved the ecosystems by reducing the pressure
based in the area below the South Pare Mountains of of animals on grasslands during the dry periods,
Tanzania (Appendix II: Case 4.4). The area covers over creating water bodies dotted over the landscape, and
700 km2 and has a population of 35,000, with close to improving growth of agriculture crops and other forms
200,000 head of cattle, with most of them located in of vegetation. The mortality rate of lactating and young
the lowlands. The climate in the lowlands is semi-arid, cattle has declined and families have better access to
with annual rainfalls of less than 500 mm, distributed nutrition and sanitation.
over two seasons. The main economic activities are
livestock rearing and crop production. Crop production
without supplemental rainwater harvesting is practically
impossible. The piped supply does not meet domestic
water needs. Keeping livestock is thus a big challenge in
the absence of drinking water. Pastoralists (mainly Pare
and Masaai tribes) are normally forced to move animals
to areas close to River Pangani in search of water and
pastures during the dry season. The adoption of ‘charco
dams’ in the past 15 years has partially reduced the
crisis of availability of water for livestock in the area.
Most pastoralists with more than 30 head of cattle own
at least one charco dam for storage of water, required
during the dry season.

A charco dam has three components: a runoff generating
or collection area, in this case, the rangelands; a
Livestock drinking trough and storage tank beside
conveyance system made up of a network of shallow
the charco dam S Tumbo
canals (up to 2 km); and a storage area (excavated pond).
Thorny brush wood planted around the dam serves as a
barrier to control access to the water. Recent additions
include livestock drinking troughs, into which water
is pumped from the pond using a treadle or motorized
pumps, and a storage tank above ground. Although
water is primarily for livestock watering, it is used
also for domestic purposes and homestead vegetable
gardens. Water stored in a charco dam lasts for 2 – 6
months (SWMRG, 2001).

Guaranteed access by the poor livestock farmers and
their families to water resources had a positive impact
on human well-being and the provision of ecosystem
services. The health of farmers, women and children,
and even livestock, improved due to enhanced water
supplies that met their drinking and domestic water
needs. The incomes of the farmers increased as better
marketing opportunities for the livestock products, Photo (left): Silt trap intercepts sediments from the
meat and milk appeared. With lactating animals being rainwater S Tumbo

30

Farmer and environmental benefits of government and ICARDA, several in situ and ex situ
rainwater harvesting in Sekkouma –Irzaine, rainwater harvesting interventions were carried out in
Morrocco and Kiffa, Mauretania the area. The primary target was to improve domestic
In the Mediterranean arid zone of Morocco, a range of water supply and on-farm water access for crops and
in situ and ex situ rainwater harvesting interventions livestock. These aims were achieved, and several
have been implemented to increase low-yielding additional positive effects materialised. Through the
farming systems and inadequate domestic water supply rainwater harvesting interventions and the follow-on
in the Sekkouma-Irzaine (Appendix II: Case 4.4). effects on farming, jobs were created in the area. The
The area covers 87,000 km2 with a population of ca interventions also created better community coherence
7,500 smallholder farmers in pastoralist communities. and improved internal communication. Through a
Primarily, rain water harvesting aimed to improve on- small dam (45,000 m3), 6ha of crop land could be
farm productivity and household water accessibility, irrigated. Runoff strips added another 2.5 ha to irrigated
but it turned out to have multiple positive benefits for production. Increased vegetation cover and species
the ecosystem as well. Implementation had a positive diversification are additional positive impacts of the
effect on the local community, in particular on women rainwater harvesting interventions. Water points for
and children, who now had their time and effort livestock and recharging of shallow wells were further
previously devoted to fetching water reduced as a result gains. The regulatory services improved as well. In
of the household tanks. Social capital was built through particular, soil loss decreased through the trapping of
the community organisation needed to implement the sediments in the in situ water harvesting structures,
different in- and ex situ rain water harvesting systems. and incidences of flooding decreased in lower lying
The gains from increased farm production improved villages. Thus, in Sekkouma-Irzaine and in Kiffa,
both nutritional status in the households, and also rainwater harvesting with water resource management
household incomes, as the surplus of farm produce, both has created positive synergies between the improvement
crops and livestock, is sold. The ecosystem services in human well-being and regeneration of ecosystems in
also were positively affected. Implementation of in an extremely fragile environment.
situ water harvesting (banks, terraces, contour ridges,
etc) increased soil infiltration thereby providing more
4.3 Conclusions and key messages
soil moisture, which enabled better vegetative growth;
i.e., improved provisional capacity. More species could The soil is a key part of the agro-ecosystem, which
thrive both on- and off-farm. In particular trees, shrubs with proper management, provides goods and services
and other permanent vegetation increased as an effect of in the form of crops and erosion control. Upper layers
the rainwater harvesting structures. Two key regulatory of the soil are thus an important part of the ecosystem
services improved in addition; firstly, soil erosion was for harvesting, retention and storage of water supplies.
reduced, and, secondly, lower lying villages were less Water security – in particular of rainwater – is a key
affected by seasonal flooding events. The ‘greening’ factor in maintaining the goods and services provided
of the landscape with more trees and water features by soils. This applies in particular to rainfed agriculture.
improved the aesthetic aspect of the community. Low and variable productivity in rainfed agricultural
areas is the major cause of poverty of 70% of the world’s
A similar story emerges from Kiffa, in the Sahelian poor.
part of Mauretania (Appendix II: Case 4.5). As in
Sekkouma-Irzaine, annual rainfall is around 300 mm Local harvesting of a small portion of the rainwater
but with extremely high temperatures, creating an through in situ conservation practices and ex situ water
arid environment. Approximately 1,200 inhabitants harvesting structures provides great opportunities for
live and use the area of 17 km2 for pastoral production sustaining farm ecosystems and their crops and livestock
and extensive cropping. Droughts and dry spells are benefits. Utilisation of this resource for supplemental/
the norm, challenging every effort to invest in, and protective irrigation of farm crops, developing
improve, the current farming systems. In addition, the small homestead gardens or even large commercial
sandy soils are very prone to wind and water erosion, production facilities and meeting livestock water needs
partly as a result of sparse vegetation cover. Through to mitigate the impacts of devastating dry spells, offers
an initiative between the local community, local a real opportunity to increase productivity in the fragile

31


rainfed regions of the world. Furthermore, a secure water References
resource encourages farmers to add value and diversify Arya, S.L., Samra, J.S. 2001. Revisiting watershed
their enterprises through the inclusion of vegetable and management institutions in Haryana Shivaliks, India.
horticultural crops, improving livestock by moving Central soil and Water Conservation Research and
towards the rearing of large dairy animals. This in turn Training Institute, Chandigarh, India, pp. 329.
leads to more value-added outputs and growth in rural Bouma, J., Soest, D., Bulte, E.H. 2005. Participatory
employment, both on and off the farm. Strong evidence watershed development in India: A sustainable
supports the view that proper development and use of approach. In. Sharma, B.R, Samra, J.S., Scott, C.A.,
the water harvesting system is the first entry point for Wani, S.P. (Eds.). 2005. Watershed Management
success of the farm-level, or regional, development Challenges: Improving productivity, resources
programs, in rainfed areas. and livelihoods. International Water Management
Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Investment in rainwater harvesting is important for Bruce, J.P., Frome, M., Haites, E., Janzen, H., Lal, R.
meeting not only the Millennium Development Goals Paustian, K. 1999. Carbon sequestration in soils. J.
on reducing hunger, but also on reducing poverty and Soil and Water Conservation, 54(1): 283-289.
ensuring environmental sustainability. In particular, Falkenmark, M., Rockstrom, J. 1993. Curbing rural
rainwater harvesting in watershed management may exodus from tropical drylands. Ambio 22(7): 427-
serve as an important incentive to protect woodlands 437.
and to reduce vulnerability of lands and water resources Falkenmark, M., Fox, P., Persson, G., Rockstrom,
to erosion and sediment load deposition. Also, most J.2001.Water Harvesting for Upgrading of Rainfed
water harvesting systems have a favourable mean cost- Agriculture: Problem Analysis and Research Needs.
benefit ratio. Stockholm International Water Institute, Stockholm,
Sweden,
Hatibu, N., K. Mutabzi, E.M. Senkondo, A.S.K.
Msangi. 2006. Economics of rainwater harvesting
for crop enterprises in semi-arid areas of East Africa.
Agricultural Water Management 80(3): 74-86.
Joshi, P.K.,A. K. Jha, .S.P. Wani, Laxmi Joshi, RL Shiyani.
2005. Meta analysis to assess impact of watershed
program and people’s action. Comprehensive
Assessment Research Report 8, International Water
Management Institute, Colombo.
Molden, David (eds.).2007. Water for Food, Water
for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water
Management in Agriculture. London: Earthscan, and
Colombo: International Water Management Institute
Pretty, J, R. Hine. 2001. Reducing Food Poverty
with Sustainable Agriculture: A Summary of New
Evidence. Final report of the “Safe World” Research
Report. University of Essex, UK.
Rockstrom, J., Falkenmark, M. 2000. Semi-arid crop
production from a hydrological perspective- Gap
between potential and actual yields. Critical Reviews
in Plant Sciences, 19(4): 319-346
Rockstrom, J., N. Hatibu, T.Y. Oweis, S.P. Wani, J.
Barron, A. Bruggeman, J. Farahani, L. Karlsberg, Z.
Qiang. 2007. Managing Water in Rainfed Agriculture.
In. Molden, D. (Eds.). Water for Food, Water for Life:
A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management
in Agriculture. London: Earthscan, and Colombo:

32

International Water Management Institute. Pp. 315- Wani, S.P., Y.S. Ramakrishna, T.K.Sreedevi, T.D.long,
352. T.Wangkahart, B.Shiferaw, P.Pathak, A.V.R.
Romani, S. 2006. National blueprint for recharging Kesava Rao. 2006. Issues, concepts, approaches
groundwater resources in India. In. Sharma, B.R., and practices in integrated watershed management:
Villholth, K.G., Sharma, K.D. (Eds.) Groundwater Experience and lessons from Asia. In. B. Shiferaw
research and management: Integrating science and K.P.C. Rao (eds.) Integrated management of
into management decisions. International Water watersheds for agricultural diversification and
Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, pp. 75- sustainable livelihoods in eastern and central Africa:
86. Lessons and experiences from semi-arid South Asia,
Samra, J.S. 2005. Policy and institutional processes of International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-
participatory watershed management in India: Past Arid Tropics, Patancheru, India
lessons learnt and future strategies. In. Sharma, World Bank. 2005. Agricultural Growth for the Poor: an
B.R.; Samra, J.S.; Scott, C.A.; Wani, S.P.(eds.).2005. agenda for development. Washington, D.C.: World
Watershed Management Challenges: Improving Bank.
productivity, resources and livelihoods. International
Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
pp.116-128.
Shah, T. 2008. India’s masterplan for groundwater
recharge: an assessment and some suggestions for
revision. Economic and Political Weekly (India)
43(51): 41-49.
Sharma, B. R., K. V. Rao, K. P. R. Vittal, U. Amarasinghe.
2008. Converting rain into grain: Opportunities
for realising the potential rainfed agriculture in
India. Proceedings National Workshop of National
River Linking Project of India, International Water
Management Institute, Colombo (pp. 239-252)
available at http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/
Other/PDF/NRLP%20Proceeding-2%20Paper%20
10.pdf
Soil-Water Management Research Group (SWMRG).
2001. Improving Water Availability for Livestock in
Northern Tanzania through Rainwater Harvesting.
Critical Problems facing Charcos, proposed
intervention measures and requested assistance.
Sokoine University of Agriculture, Tanzania, 5 pp.
Sreedevi, T.K., S.P. Wani, R. Sudi, M.S. Patel, T.Jayesh,
S.N. Singh , T.Shah. 2006. On-site and Off-site
impacts of watershed development: A case study of
Rajasamdhiyala, Gujarat, India. Global theme on
Agroecosystems Report 20. Andhra Pradesh, India:
International Crops Institute for the Semi-Arid
Tropics.
Van Koppen, B., R.Namara, C. C. Stafilos-Rothschild.
2005. Reducing poverty through investments in
agricultural water Management: Poverty and gender
issues and synthesis of Sub-Saharan Africa Case
study Reports. Working paper 101. International
Water Management Institute, Colombo.

33


CHAPTER 5

Forests working as rainwater harvesting systems
Main author: Anders Malmer, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå,
Sweden

Ulrik Ilstedt, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden
Jennie Barron, Stockholm Environment Institute, York, UK/Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm, Sweden

5.1. Global trends in forest cover of planted forests (Table 5.1), this group represents a
continuum of use of trees for a variety of purposes in
Net deforestation has lost some pace during the last small woodlots, agroforestry and homesteads. Most of
decades, but is still severe in a global context (FAO, the small holder increase is in Asia. In Africa there is
2005). Notably, the range and nature of deforestation is a significant increase in timber plantations. In the near
very variable in different regions and countries. In many and mid-term future, these plantations will continue to
cases, with intensifying cultivation and conversion to expand, driven primarily by the growing demand from
pasture or permanent low-input agriculture, the result is China and India. In recent years, both countries have
not only loss of biodiversity and its related ecosystem invested heavily in timber plantation holdings, both
services, but landscapes are at risk of erosion, water nationally and overseas.
pollution, flooding and decreasing soil productivity.
These land use and land quality developments are very Agroforestry, or systems of intercropping permanent and
undesirable from the perspective of meeting the needs annual crops, has gained a positive aura and developed
for increased biomass production for food and energy, strongly to improve traditional cultivation systems in a
as well as for ensuring a supply of clean water. On the broad variety of environments. The relative success of
other hand, much less attention is given in the media to biomass production in planted forestry has in many cases
the simultaneous processes of increasing forested areas been overshadowed by negative ecosystems impacts
in some regions and the increasing use of planted trees and social-institutional issues. Ecosystem services
for various purposes. Planted forests have historically affected include shifts of water use within the landscape
contributed to development in many countries in and losses of biodiversity when converting from natural
temperate regions, and have the potential to improve forest. When established without consideration of local
the livelihoods of millions of people in other regions. stakeholders exclusion from previous livelihoods, it has
Today, planted forests comprise 6.9% of the world’s sometimes caused longstanding conflicts. However,
total forest area of which more than half is located in as the natural forest cover continues to degrade and
the South. In 2050, FAO predict that 75% of global decrease, there is an increasing need for planted forests.
wood consumption will come from planted forests and In the case of smallholders, crop and land tenure policies
that this expansion will be global. Recent expectations often do not favour investments by farmers on land out
of forests as bio-energy reserves may dramatically raise of their control. Improved management and tenure
the demands for new planted forests.75% of planted systems are needed for safeguarding the social and
forests are intended for industrial production. Forests environmental values of forests in the entire landscape.
owned by smallholders increased more than 3 times This chapter will discuss the link between forests, water
during 1990-2005 and now represent over 30% of and ecosystem services for human well-being. It will
all planted forests (FAO, 2005; 2006). Outside these provide an introduction to the potentially high values
figures, trees planted outside forests and on homesteads of establishing stable planted forests for “rain water
are increasing steadily. Apart from FAO definitions harvesting” as one potential intervention to rehabilitate

34

Table 5.1: Definitions of planted forest in the forest continuum from natural forests to single trees.
FAO, 2007

Naturally regenerated forests Planted forests

Semi-natural Plantations
Trees outside forests
Modified
Primary Assisted natu-
natural Planted
ral regenera- Productive Protective
component
tion
Forest of native Forest of nat- Silvicultural Forest Forest of intro- Forest of Stands smaller than
species, where urally regen- practices by of native duced and/or introduced 0.5 ha; tree cover
there are no erated native intensive man- species native species and/or native in agricultural land
clearly visible species where agement: established established species estab- (agroforestry sys-
indications of there are •Weeding through through plant- lished through tems, home gardens,
human activities clearly visible •Fertilizing planting or ing or seed- planting orchards); trees in
and the ecologi- indications of •Thinning seeding, ing mainly for or seeding urban environments;
cal processes are human activi- •Selective log- intensively production of mainly for and scattered along
not significantly ties. ging managed wood or non- provision of roads and in land-
disturbed wood goods services scapes

landscapes, giving examples from tropical semi-arid with high aesthetic and spiritual values. Thus, from a
and humid cases. Also we would like to emphasis comprehensive livelihood perspective, forests and trees
the need for development of more varied plantation in the landscape offers multiple ecosystem services
practices and better understanding of the water-related for the water consumed. Many of these products are
values of planted forests in the wide range of settings essential in times of crop failure, when forest products
where they are used. can provide food and income in times of crisis.

Forests, trees and bushes form specific part of landuse
5.2 Forests ecosystems as water
systems. Considering the water balance, tress normally
harvest interventions for human
uses more water per area than an annual cereal crop in the
welfare
very same location. Thus, the ‘old paradigm’ of forests
as ‘water towers’ or as ‘water protectors’ is rarely valid It is now an empirically and theoretically well-
in the landscape (Jackson et al., 2005). However, the established general scientific paradigm that forests use
provisional ecosystem services capacity of a woodlot, more water than lower vegetation and annual crops in
apart from water, can outweigh those of the same area rainfed agriculture. Consequently, empirical evidence
being cultivated. In general, the total biomass gain is is strong that cutting forests results in increased stream
higher and biodiversity is improved, provisioning a flows (Bosch and Hewlett, 1982). Typically, when
range of produce which can be harvested, often more forest cover is regenerated, more rainfall tends to
reliably than annual crop systems. Forests also provide (once again) be partitioned through soil infiltration and
wood and energy. From a regulatory perspective, trees to green water (used for food and fibre production),
and forests play a significant role in affecting soil reducing its availability as blue water (available for
infiltration capacity and reducing erosion. They enhance human consumption) downstream (Farley et al., 2005;
soil quality through litter fall and extensive root systems, Scott et al., 2005).
and have been shown to act as water purifiers. Trees
and forests in many cultures often fall under special As a special case in semi-arid areas, old growth forests
local management systems, to ensure their sustainable may work as “sponges” to better retain or recharge
maintenance. Often, trees and forests are associated groundwater and to maintain dry season stream flow.

35


This has long been an item for scientific and policy ecosystems, and increasingly they are genetically
debate (Bruijnzeel, 2004). Forests have been shown improved for fast wood production, but not necessarily
to maintain a high soil infiltration capacity by superior to be water efficient. Furthermore, these new forests
litter fall and soil protection (e.g., Bruijnzeel, 1990). are monocultures of vigorously growing young trees
Increasing surface runoff after deforestation increases in contrast to old growth forest, which are mixes of
surface run-off and possible soil deterioration, leading species, old trees, young trees and treeless gaps. Deep
to more “blue water,” but water that is often polluted by rooted eucalypts are often given as an “example” of
soil erosion. The higher surface runoff during rainfall the highly water consuming exotics, but a range of
events at a deforested location means that less water other tree species may show similar relative increases
is contributed to long term groundwater recharge on in water use, compared to the natural forest in a given
site during the wet season. Depending on the location, site. In South Africa, the water consumption of trees is
shallow groundwater is often linked to lower lying recognised in water management. To establish a wood
stream flows, regulating the river base flow during dry lot or plantation requires special permission from
seasons. Decreasing shallow groundwater recharge local forest and water authorities, and is associated
through deforestation may thus deplete surface water with specific fees and costs as it will decrease water
sources in times of high demand. The reduction of available for other uses in landscape. One reason for
stream flow after deforestation has often been observed increased water consumption in afforested areas is the
by rural people, but only a few studies have reported use of exotic, more water consuming species, compared
the expected long term decline in dry season flows to the native vegetation.
(Bruijnzeel, 1989; Sandström, 1998). Thus, we have
some evidence that a “sponge effect” can be lost by We conclude that forest water use is often a significant
deforestation and subsequent soil degradation, but the factor in landscape water flows, including surface, sub-
conclusion can hardly be made general for all semi-arid surface and downstream. But the specific impact on the
forest ecosystems. water resources of deforestation and afforestation is
governed not only by site specific soil and topographic
Based upon evidence on how tree litterfall and soil conditions, but also by whether species are native or
protection can improve soil quality and reduce surface exotic; whether trees are in large homogenous plantations
runoff and erosion (e.g. Hurni and Tato, 1992), the or in a landscape and stand structure mosaic. The water
restoration of a “forest sponge effect” has generally use and partitioning of a forest stand is also relative
been taken for granted (Kaimowitz, 2005). This has to the site’s natural or alternative landuses and water
been the paradigm behind numerous forest/tree planting balance flows. Due to the complexity of forests and their
projects and one of several drivers for adoption of impacts on the local water balance, few comprehensive
agroforestry. However, in this case, there are many case studies exist for each climatic, vegetative and
local witnesses to the fact that new forests often make hydrological response, especially for semi-arid tropical
wells and streams even drier than after deforestation. As regions with previously forested, now degraded, soils.
for scientific studies in this case, long term studies are In contrast the few studies available are from southern
scarce. In contrast to the “lost sponge effect” paradigm, Africa and India where former non-forested grasslands
the few studies conducted in semi-arid environments and savannas have been afforested. Thus, the lack of
all confirm that new forests use more green water than data and empirical evidence is seriously challenging
they contribute to blue water in terms of groundwater our ability to assess potential water balance impacts
recharge. This effect of “not enough ground water by deforestationor afforestation in specific landscape
recharge” is manifested in these studies as generally contexts.
declining stream flows following (re)forestation (Scott
et al., 2005). Synergies and trade offs in miombo
woodlands, southern Africa
High water use by new forests reflects higher production. Miombo woodland is a significant biome covering about
The new forests established are most often planted 10 % of the African landmass (Fig. 5.1), approximately
exotic species like eucalyptus and pines. They are 2.5 – 4 million km2 depending on definition (White,
chosen for their high productivity. Many of the species 1983; Millington et al., 1994). It supports the livelihood
used are pioneer species in their respective original of 100 million people in the area or outside, relying on

36

products from this distinct and unique biome (Campbell species composition in many areas (Campbell et al.,
et al., 2007). Major provisional ecosystem services 2007). Forest management and tree planting mostly
essential for livelihoods are charcoal for rural and has been focussed on exotic species in plantations and
urban energy, water for downstream needs, wood, meat woodlots, even if, more recently, there are increasing
from grazing and hunting, fruit, tourism, and habitat numbers of interesting examples of natural forest
provision, etc. In addition, the woodland affects several management in Zimbabwe (Gerhart and Nemarundwe,
regulatory services, such as landscape water flows, soil 2006) and elsewhere (Campbell et al., 2007). Tanzania
erosion control and regeneration of soil health in the and Zimbabwe are the central concerned miombo
smallholder systems. Throughout its physically varied countries that have the most forest plantations. Total
region, miombo woodlands overlap with deciduous areas are still moderate and about half of them are
forests and open savannahs (Frost et al., 1986). The industrial (Varmola and Del Lungo, 2002). Looking
climate is semi-arid with one wet season, but annual ahead, with increasing demands for energy, industrial
rainfall ranges as much as 550 – 1200 mm and dry wood and carbon credits, there is a growing interest in
season lasts between 3 and 7 months. The miombo plantation forestry in the relatively sparsely populated
woodlands also coincide with some of the poorest sub- miombo region, not least in Tanzania (e.g., Stave, 2006).
Saharan African countries, with relatively low rates The miombo landscape provides a very varied structure
of achievement of many Millennium Development and net primary productivity of the continuum ranges
Goals relating to water supply and sanitation. The high from degraded miombo to well-managed miombo to
prevalence of HIV/AIDS among other diseases is a big even-aged forest plantations. This has large impact
challenge to the people living in the area. on water management, both through water use by the
trees as well as by the impact on soils and potential
Deforestation is an old and ongoing process in the groundwater recharge (Malmer and Nyberg, 2008). Any
miombo region (FAO, 2007), but large areas are still major change in the miombo woodlands needs serious
covered by miombo in various states. Long term human consideration: can the ’sponge effect’ be lost? And
impacts are often profound on forest structure and what implications does that have on provisioning and

Figure 5.1. Distribution of miombo woodlands, major biome in semi-arid southern hemisphere Africa.

37


regulating ecosystem services supporting vulnerable matter content, and oxidation. In miombo, already low
livelihoods in the area? topsoil organic contents are typically reduced by up
to 50 % by agriculture (Walker and Desanker, 2004).
An example of the altered water balance due to the Soil organic matter also determines top soil physical
planting of exotic species is the decreased lower annual properties. The soil structure (soil aggregates increasing
and dry season stream flows in areas populated by the amount of large pores) determines to a large extent
Eucalyptus saligna compared to nearby grasslands the partitioning between surface runoff, erosion and
in Sao Hill, Tanzania; the stream flow reduction by soil water infiltration (Bruijnzeel, 1990; Malmer et al.,
Pinus patula was much less (Mhando, 1991). Thus, 2005). In various land uses in Zambia, the structural
planting eucalyptus could potentially mean a loss of stability of the soil was shown to be positively related
biodiversity, and reduced dry season flows. In another to soil organic carbon (King and Campbell, 1993). Soil
study, using long term data, Kashaigili et al. (2006) crusting is a common reason for reduced soil water
show major decreases in dry season flows (60-70%) infiltration in semi-arid areas. Perrolf and Sandström
between 1958 and 2004, downstream of the Usangu (1995) concluded that vegetation cover was the other
wetlands in Tanzania. In the upstream areas, woodlands major determinant apart from soil texture in Tanzania
have decreased strongly due to expansion of cultivated and Botswana. Similarly, Casenave and Valentin
lands and bare land. In this case it may be tempting to (1992),using data from 87 sites in semi-arid West
hypothesise on the “lost sponge effect”, but Kashaigili et Africa, found intensity of surface sealing, vegetative
al. (2006) used modelling to show that the major reason cover and soil faunal activity to be determinants of soil
for declining dry season flows was due to increase of water infiltration. Organic matter in the soil is highly
irrigated agriculture upstream from the wetlands. dependant on vegetation species composition. Research
suggests that miombo may not always be superior
A healthy soil system is key for catching to exotic species, but the condition of the miombo
rainfall stand does affect the litter, the soil organic matter
Management of organic material in soils is crucial for and subsequently the infiltration of rainfall (Ilstedt et
a healthy soil system. Soil organic matter influences al.,2007; Ngegba et al.,2001; King and Campbell,
soil physical characteristics and availability of plant 1993; Nord, 2008) (Fig. 5.2).
nutrients. Increased soil organic matter increases soil
water storage capacity, and water infiltration capacity. In the miombo region, like other semi-arid areas, a
Harvesting, grazing and fire lead to degradation by higher intensity of land use in trees is already leading
reducing litterfall; i.e., contributing to reduced organic to environmental degradation. Despite inadequate
scientific clarity in regard to the biophysical processes
and lack of empirical data, resources have to be
managed. Multi-species plantations in general are
shown by meta-analysis to be more productive than
mono-specific plantations (Piotto, 2008). At the same
time these more complex forest stand types might have
a more favourable impact on infiltration and a more
moderate water demand compared to most even-aged
monocultures. In addition, experiences of development
of smallholder involvement in forest establishment and
management from Asia might be fruitful to apply in the
miombo region (Nawir et al., 2007).

West African parklands – trees in agriculture
generate soil and water gains
Sudano-Sahelian parklands stem from dry deciduous
forests with some relation to miombo. These parklands
have had strong human influence on the structure of the
Typical miombo woodland Malmer vegetation for a long time. While small-scale shifting

38

cultivation is dominant in miombo (Campbell et al., important to ensure maximum rainwater infiltration into
1996), the parkland of West Africa is dominantly under the soil profile (Casenave and Valentin, 1992; Hansson,
permanent traditional agroforestry with dense wooded 2006). In addition, Bayala et al. (2003) concluded from
savannah. There is an abundance of preferred indigenous a study carried out in the parklands of Burkina Faso that
tree species (Pullan, 1974). The fallow periods are an application of leaf litter mulch from Parkia biglobosa
continuously being shortened because of pressure for and Vitellaria paradoxa prunings improved soil organic
land (Boffa, 2000). However, farmers retain trees in matter content as well as water infiltration. More recent
farmlands for their own livelihood purposes. Bayala et al. (2008) have shown some parkland trees to
hydraulically redistribute water during the dry season.
Certain species such as Vitellaria provide valuable This means that the trees at night transport water from
butter from the kernels of the tree nuts. This is used for deeper soil layers to the top soil. This is beneficial for
local consumption and provides an important source of both the trees and other plants during hot dry season
income for rural women (Kelly et al., 2004). Products days. However, as for miombo, there has not been clear
from several tree species are also used in traditional scientific verification of the effect of the trees on water
medicine and produce edible fruits. However, due to budgets. The effect on rainfall by re-introducing trees
the intensification of agriculture (mainly the use of and their management in the parklands also has not
tractors) in the region, the parklands are decreasing and been clearly synthesized and interpreted.
in many cases the tree cover is diminishing (Nikiéma,
2005). Several studies have shown that trees add soil On a field scale, in situ rainwater harvesting can enhance
organic matter through litter fall as well as promoting re-establishment of trees on the landscape. The success
biological activity in the soil (Young, 1995) and thereby of re-greening of the Central Plateau, Burkina Faso
improve the physical properties of the soil (e.g., Traoré (Reij and Smaling, 2008) is an example where land
et al., 2004). These benefits are similar to the effects of reclamation through in situ water harvesting has led to
applying compost manure to the fields (Ouédraogo et increased numbers of trees on former crop-land (Reij et
al., 2001). al., 2003). In this case, the severe droughts generated
a positive response in terms of activating communities
Little is known from research about the effects of trees and mobilizing resources to address multiple challenges
on the water management of the parklands, although including poverty, low crop yields and severe land
vegetative cover in the region is considered to be degradation. Farmers, NGOs, local government and

Figure 5.2: Examples of efficiency of rehabilitation of water infiltration capacity after planting trees of
different species and in different situations: open land to Sesbania, open land to Leucena agroforestry,
grassland to Tektona (teak) and rehabilitation of severely degraded tractor track under lightly logged
rainforest (after Ilstedt et al., 2007).

39


external funders together enabled the adoption of in situ
rainwater harvesting for growing crops and trees. A few
key technologies were particularly interesting such as
the zai pitting, and the construction of stone bunds and
gully control structures. The results of in situ rainwater
harvesting showed that average crop yields doubled over
20 years, producing more forage leading to increased
livestock numbers and establishment of more trees
(citing Riej et al., 2003). In addition, species diversity
in fauna was regenerated, and a noticeable rise occurred
in the groundwater table. Although soil fertility has
improved through better soil and water management,
there is more potential for improvement. According to Productive parkland in Sahel Malmer
the local communities, food security has improved to
meet the demand of the population, that has increased
by 25% between 1984 and 1996. An important effect of for carbon sequestration and better moisture retention
improved yields is that no further crop land expansion for improved crop harvest (Ouattara, 2007). This is
has occurred since mid 1980s despite the population instrumental for climate change adaptation where
growth and improved livelihoods. scenarios indicate drier climates in years to come.

In contrast to increasing demands for higher biomass
Trees removed in lack of knowledge for total production and increased crop yields, and in view of
valuation? the lack of reliable data on trees and their benefits, it is
Removal of trees and lack of regeneration in the parkland not easy to motivate people on economic and long term
is often driven by the introduction of mechanized benefits of trees in parklands. There is a lack of clear
farming in a cotton and maize rotation system. This validation systems for evaluating the effect of retaining
is for increased food production and cash incomes trees in parklands. Carbon trading systems have not
for local communities. However in the long term, this been fully successful in providing this validation, but it
production system may lead to a decline in soil organic is expected that the recognition of such systems in the
matter, fertility, high erosion risk and soil degradation post-Kyoto protocols for REDD (Reducing Emissions
(Lal, 1993). Maintaining soil organic matter is important from Deforestation and Degradation) might be one
way.

5.4 Conclusions
We conclude that cases of forestry and of a landscape
mosaic with trees can be seen as ‘rainwater harvesting
interventions’, where the forests and trees provides
numerous provisional, regulatory, aesthetic and
supporting ecosystem services for sustaining livelihoods
and producing economic benefit. The notion of forests
being ‘water towers’ is a misconception, as forests
and trees actually consume water in generating the
ecosystem services. However, this ‘lost’ water creates
other benefits in terms of human welfare via the
goods and services provided by the forest ecosystems.
Depending on local conditions, forest areas can act as
sponges, ensuring stable base-flows in downstream river
systems, as well as increasing water infiltration into the
Degraded parklands in Sahel Malmer soil, which can recharge shallow groundwater sources.

40

However, the cases of water partitioning in semi-arid transport are all complementary benefits for a local
miombo woodlands and West African parklands cannot community. However, extensive land-use changes from
be generalized to locations with different species forests to plantations or to decreased forest cover should
and management strategies. The lack of empirical always be weighed within a comprehensive impact
evidence of linkages between trees, landscapes and assessment of both environmental and social-economic
rainfall complicates the issue of possible tradeoffs or issues, including the landscape water balance.
mutual benefits to be derived from trees, or in terms of
ecosystem services and landscape water flows (green
and blue water partitioning of rainfall). As Scott et
al. (2005) express, possibly in most cases, productive
forests might use more water than they contribute
to groundwater recharge. On the other hand, with
increasing demands for high levels of production of
both wood and food, the alternative, with continued
deforestation and continued deterioration of forests,
parklands and their soils, is hardly a viable alternative.

The ‘rainwater harvesting’ effect of trees and forests
is turned into valuable goods and services and is also
linked to the impact on the soil surface and the actual
consumption of water. Trees generate litter, which
improves the organic matter content in soils - a key
component to increased water infiltration. Secondly,
trees reduce rainfall impacts on soil surfaces that
control soil erosion and sediment transport. Although
there is limited empirical data on water balances and
forests, the well-known benefits of forest ecosystem
services can offer a positive regeneration of degraded
and water stressed landscapes. Improved provisioning
of goods and services as wood, fodder, fruit, medicines,
sometimes water flows as well as habitats for diverse
flora and fauna are all components that are enhancing
the livelihoods of smallholder farmers. Additional
benefits such as water purification, build-up of fertile
soil systems, and reduced flooding and sediment

Sahelina parkland Mali Enfors

41


References Hurni H, Tato K., (eds) 1992. Erosion, conservation and
Bayala, J., Mando, A., Ouedraogo, S.J. and Teklehaimanot, small-scale farming. International Soil Conservation
Z., 2003. Managing Parkia biglobosa and Vitellaria Organisation and World Association of Soil and Water
paradoxa Prunings for Crop Production and Improved Conservation, Bern.
Soil Properties in the Sub-Sudanian Zone of Burkina Ilstedt, U., Malmer, A., Verbeeten, E. and Murdiyarso, D.
Faso. Arid Land Res & Man, 17(3): 283 - 296. 2007. The effect of afforestation on water infiltration in
Bayala, J., Heng, L.K., van Noordwijk, M. and Ouedraogo, the tropics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. For
S.J., in press. Hydraulic redistribution study in two Ecol & Man, 251, 45–51.
native tree species of agroforestry parklands of West Kaimowitz, D. 2005. Useful myths and intractable truths:
African dry savanna. Acta Oecologica, (2008) Boffa, the politics of the link between forests and water in
J.M., 2000. Les parcs agroforestiers en Afrique Central America. In: Forest-water-people in the humid
subsaharienne. Cahier FAO Conservation, 34. tropics (eds Bonell M, Bruijnzeel LA), pp. 86–98.
Bruijnzeel, L.A. 1989. (De)forestation and dry season Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
flow in the tropics: a closer look. J Trop For Sci, 1: Kashaigili, J.J., McCartney, M.P., Mahoo, H.F., Lankford,
145–161. B.A., Mbilinyi, B.P., Yawson, D.K. and Tumbo, S.D.
Bruijnzeel, L. A. 1990. Hydrology of moist tropical 2006. Use of a Hydrological Model for Environmental
forests and effects of conversion: A state of knowledge Management of the Usangu Wetlands, Tanzania.
review. UNESCO – IHP, Humid Tropics Programme, IWMI Research Report, 104. http://www.iwmi.cgiar.
Paris. org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/index.
Bruijnzeel, L.A. 2004. Hydrological functions of tropical aspx (7 November 2008).
forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agric, Ecos & Kelly, B.A., Bouvet, J.M. and Picard, N., 2004. Size class
Env 104: 185-228. distribution and spatial pattern of Vitellaria paradoxa
Campbell, B., Frost, P.G.H. and Byron, N., 1996. Miombo in relation to farmers’ practices in Mali. Agrofor Sys,
woodlands and their use: Over view and key issues. In: 60(1): 3-11.
The Miombo in Transition: Woodlands and Wellfare in King, J.A. and Campbell, B.M. 1993. Soil organic matter
Africa, B. Campbell (ed.). CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, relations in five land cover types in the miombo region
pp 1-10. (Zimbabwe). For Ecol & Man, 67: 225-239.
Campbell, B.M., Angelsen, A., Cunningham, A., Lal, R., 1993. Tillage effect on soil degradation, soil
Katerere, Y., Sitoe, A. And Wunder, S. 2007. Miombo resilience, soil quality and sustainability. Soil Till. Res,
woodlands – opportunities and barriers to sustainable 27: 1-8.
forest management. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia http:// Malmer, A., van Noordwijk, M. and Bruijnzeel, L.A.
www.cifor.cgiar.org/miombo/docs/Campbell_ 2005. Effects of shifting cultivation and forest fire.
BarriersandOpportunities.pdf (4th November 2008) In: Bonell, M., Bruijnzeel, L.A. (Eds.), Forest-water-
Casenave, A.and Valentin, C. 1992. A runoff capability people in the humid tropics: Past present and future
classification system based on surface features criteria hydrological research for integrated land and water
in semi-arid areas of West Africa. J Hydrol, 130: 231- management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
249. pp. 533-560.
FAO 2007. State of the World’s Forests 2007. Food and Malmer, A. and Nyberg, G., 2008. Forest and water
Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations, Rome, relations in miombo woodlands: need for understanding
Italy. 140p. of complex stand management. In: Varmola, M.,
Farley, K.A., Jobbágy, G. and Jackson, R.B. 2005. Effects Valkonen, S. and Taipanen, S. (eds), Research and
of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with development for sustainable management of semiarid/
implications for policy. Glob Ch Biol, 11, 1565–1576. miombo/woodlands in East Africa. Working Papers of
Frost, P.G.H., Medina, E., Menaut, J.C., Solbrig, O., Swift, the Finnish Forest Research Institute 98: 70-86. http://
M. and Walker, B., 1986. Responses of savannas to www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2008/mwp098.
stress and disturbance. Biol. Int. 10: 1-78. htm (in press)
Hansson, L., 2006. Comparisons of Infiltrability Capacities Mhando, L.M. 1991. Forest hydrological studies in
in Different Parklands and Farming Systems of Semi- Eucalyptus saligna, Pinus patula and grassland
Arid Burkina Faso. MSc Thesis, Swedish University catchments at Sao Hill, Tanzania. MSc thesis, Stencils
of Agricultural Science, Umeå, 20 pp.

42

series, 17, Department of Forest Site Research, Swedish Large-scale Monoculture Tree Plantations, Friends of
University of Agricultural Science, Umeå, Sweden. the Earth International in cooperation with the World
Millington, A. C., Chritchley, R. W., Douglas, T. D. and Rainforest Movement and FERN, http://www.wrm.
Ryan, P. 1994. Prioritization of indigenous fruit tree org.uy/actors/CCC/trouble6.html (4th November
species based on formers evaluation criteria: some 2008)
preliminary results from central region, Malawi. In: Traoré, K., Ganry, F., Oliver, R. and Gigou, J., 2004. Litter
Proceedings of the regional conference on indigenous Production and Soil Fertility in a Vitellaria paradoxa
fruit trees of the Miombo ecozone of Southern Africa, Parkland in a Catena in Southern Mali. Arid Land Res
Mangochi, Malawi, January 23–27 1994, 97–105. Man, 18(4): 359-368.
ICRAF, Nairobi. Varmola, M. and Del Lungo (editors), 2002. Forest
Nikiéma, A., 2005. Agroforestry Parkland Species plantation areas 1995 data set. Forestry Department,
Diversity:Uses and Management in Semi-Arid West Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Africa (Burkina Faso). PhD thesis, Wageningen Nations, Rome, Forest Plantations Working Papers,
University, Wageningen. FP/18. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y7204E/
Nord, H. 2008. Water infiltration under different land use y7204e00.htm#Contents (4th November 2008)
in miombo woodlands outside Morogoro, Tanzania. Walker, S.M. and Desanker, P.W. 2004. The impact of
MSc thesis, Department of Forest Ecology and land use on soil carbon in Miombo Woodlands of
Management, Swedish University of Agriculture, Malawi. Fort Ecol Man, 203: 345-360.
Sweden, 2008: 34. White, F. 1983. The vegetation of Africa. Natural resources
Ouédraogo, E., Mando, A. and Zombré, N.P., 2001. Research 20, UNESCO, Paris.
Use of compost to improve soil properties and crop Young, A., 1995. L’agroforestrie pour la conservation du
productivity under low input agricultural system in sol. CTA, Wageningen, Pays Bas. 194 p.
West Africa. Agric, Ecos & Env.84(3): 259-266.
Ouattara, K., 2007. Improved soil and water conservatory
managements for cotton-maize rotation system in the
western cotton area of Burkina Faso. PhD Thesis,
Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Umeå.
Piotto, D. 2008. A meta-analysis comparing tree growth
in monocultures and mixed plantations. Forest Ecol.
Man. 255: 781-786.
Pullan, R.A. 1974. Farmed parklands in West Africa.
Savanna, 3: 119-151.
Reij, C., G.Tappan, A. Belvemire. 2005. Changing land
management practises and vegetation on the Central
Plateau of Burkina Faso (1968-2002). J.Arid Env.
63:642-659
Reij, C.P.; Smaling, E.M.A. 2008. Analyzing successes
in agriculture and land management in Sub-Saharan
Africa: Is macro-level gloom obscuring positive micro-
level change? Land Use Policy 25 (3). - p. 410 - 420.
Sandström, K. 1998. Can forests ‘provide’ water:
widespread myth or scientific reality? Ambio, 27,
132–138.
Scott, D.F., Bruijnzeel, L.A. and Mackensen, J. 2005.
The hydrological and soil impacts of forestation in
the tropics. In: Forest-water-people in the humid
tropics (eds Bonell M, Bruijnzeel LA), pp. 622–651.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stave, J. 2000. Carbon Upsets: Norwegian “Carbon
Plantations” in Tanzania. In: Negative Impact of

43


CHAPTER 6

Rainwater harvesting for water security in rural and
urban areas

Main author: Klaus W. König, Überlingen, Germany

Johann Gnadlinger, Brazilian Rainwater Catchment and Management Association, (ABCMAC),
Juazeiro, Brazil
Mooyoung Han, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Hans Hartung, FAKT-Consult, Weikersheim, Germany
Günter Hauber-Davidson, Water Conservation Group Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia
Andrew Lo, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan
Zhu Qiang, Gansu Research Institute for Water Conservancy, Wuxi City, China

6.1 Introduction

At the 2000 UN Millennium Summit, world leaders
from rich and poor countries alike committed
themselves to eight time-bound goals as a blue print to
accelerate development. The resultant plan is set forth
in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Goal 7
addressed the environment and water. Its targets include
the goal to “halve, by 2015, the proportion of the
population without sustainable access to safe drinking
water and basic sanitation”. In relation to water, this
implies provision of safe water for drinking as well as
for hygiene. And because these amounts are relatively
small (compared with e.g., agriculture) there are large

Fetching water from a dry river bed in Mozambique
Chang/UNEP

potentials to exploit rainwater harvesting in this context
of human well-being.

Halfway through to the 2015 targets, globally, the target
related to drinking water is expected to be met, but not
the sanitation target. Nevertheless, these global figures
mask a critical situation in some regions. For example,
sub-Saharan Africa and Oceania will not meet these
targets at the present rate of implementation. With 2.4
billion persons without access to sanitation in 2004, the
target will also be missed, particularly in South Asia,
Development domains for rooftop Rainwater East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. To meet the target
Harvesting in Africa UNEP/Khaka requires doubling the efforts of the last 15 years for

44

an economic value on ecosystem services, some
attempts have been made. The Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment found that 60% of the ecosystems assessed
were in global decline, particularly the aquatic ones,
with detrimental effects to human well-being. A
significant cause of ecosystem degradation is over-
abstraction for water supply. Rainwater harvesting can
be used to improve ecosystem function, particularly
the water supply aspect, and regulation (controlling
flood and erosion). Globally, there is a significant
untapped potential in rainwater which can be harvested
to improve ecosystem services and human well-being.
This chapter addresses the contribution of rainwater in
improving ecosystem services related to rural and urban
water supplies.

6.2 Rainwater harvesting, ecosystems
and rural water supply
Most people living in rural areas depend on development
which is based on ecosystem services. Typical rural
ecosystem services that support human livelihoods
Water carrying in Bhutan, India UNEP/Khaka include water supply, agriculture including livestock
management, fisheries, and forest and tree products
(timber, honey, fruit, vegetables, fibres, fuel etc.). In
sanitation, and increasing those made for drinking water many parts of Africa, wild fruit, firewood and charcoal
by a third. are major sources of income, especially in times of
crop failure. Ecosystems are also necessary for water
Though only one target addresses water, it plays a purification, erosion regulation, waste treatment and
critical role in meeting the goals, particularly those disease regulation. Support services include soil
concerning hunger, poverty, health and biodiversity. To formation (providing good soils for agriculture and
meet the MDGs often assumes a reliable source of good vegetation). Degradation of these ecosystem services is
quality water. As an example, the MDG water target threatening the achievement of the MDGs.
focuses on infrastructure, policies, awareness creation,
etc. with little attention to the sustainable management About one sixth of the world population – a total of 1.1
of the water sources. Available freshwater continues to billion people – remains without access to improved
decline due to over-abstraction, pollution and reduced drinking water, and 84% of these live in rural areas. In
precipitation, resulting in a decrease in runoff. An addition, 2 of the 2.6 billion people without access to
estimated 1.8 billion will live in water scarce areas and basic sanitation live in rural areas (UNICEF& WHO,
two- thirds in water stressed areas by 2050. Climate 2006). The figure differs according to regions. For
change will worsen the situation. Ecosystems play an example, in 2004, in sub-Saharan African rural areas,
important part in water availability and vice versa, but the number of people who were not provided with
the link between ecosystems and water availability is improved drinking water was five times higher and
complex and not fully understood. those without access to sanitation were three times
higher than those living in urban areas. Poverty is also
Freshwater ecosystems link directly and indirectly much higher in the rural areas.
with human well-being, especially the well-being of
poor communities and households. There is a close In rural communities, water is required for drinking and
interdependency between freshwater ecosystems agricultural purposes. Rainwater harvesting is highly
and human well-being. Though it is not easy to put decentralized and enables individuals and communities

45


to manage their own water for these purposes. This Agro-pastoralists enhance livelihoods
is particularly suitable in rural areas with a dispersed through better water supply in Kenya
population and where a reticulated water supply is not In Kaijado and Lare, in the semi-arid savannah of
feasible or extremely costly for investment. The low Kenya, rainwater harvesting provides water for
cost of the rainwater harvesting technologies can be a drinking, sanitation, and enhancing the productivity
more attractive investment option in rural areas. of the agro-eco systems (Appendix II: Case 6.1).
The technologies introduced consisted of roof-
In addition to water for drinking and sanitation, fishing, water harvesting for domestic purposes (drinking
animal husbandry and agriculture are the major activities and sanitation), runoff collection in ponds for small
in rural areas which all depend on a reliable water supply gardens, trenches for groundwater recharge and
to be productive. As shown in Chapters 3 and 4, rainwater afforestation. For sustainability, the project included a
harvesting can also help meet the demands for water micro-finance component, where the community was
for these purposes. There are numerous cases where trained to manage credits before borrowing money
rainwater harvesting is used to improve livelihoods by from commercial institutions.
providing water for domestic purposes; for subsistence
and income generation activities such as gardening, and The project has enhanced the ecosystem functioning by
livestock rearing; for environmental purposes, through recharging groundwater, increasing the volume of water
recharging groundwater and establishing woodlots to stored, and reducing soil erosion through the family
reduce deforestation. In essence, it can supply water woodlots that reduced runoff-related erosion. Once the
to accelerate social and economic development, to planted trees have matured, the women will use them
alleviate poverty and generate income for rural farmers for fuel, contributing to the reduction of deforestation,
by enhancing the crop yield, modifying the method which is a major problem in the area.
of production, as well as to promoting environmental
conservation. Family livelihoods improved from selling vegetables
and income generation activities such bee-keeping and

Working together to dig a run off RWH pond UNEP/Khaka

46

(Ministry of Environment, 2006; Silva, 2006). From
an ecosystem service perspective, rainwater harvesting
and storage has impacted farm productivity in numerous
ways. Using water for the irrigation of higher value
crops, such as in kitchen gardens, especially off-season
has been beneficial for household food supplies and
incomes. Rainwater harvesting has also resulted in
an increased number of goats per household, partly
as more fodder is available. On the land, observed
changes include: reduced erosion through the practice
of conservation tillage and construction of soil bunds,
Harambee constructing water storage in Kenya reduced flooding downstream, and increased species
Hartung diversity due to infiltration banks and sub-surface
storage dams. So far, the effects of rainwater harvesting
crafts. The community can now borrow money from have not affected water supplies downstream.
commercial micro-finance companies which they use
for productive activities. Since the establishment of Rainwater harvesting has been accepted by the rural
the micro-finance component, all of the members have community in the SAB (Gnadlinger, 2006) who have
been paid on time, and there have not been any arrears. learned to live in harmony with nature in a semi-arid
Providing water to schools enabled girls to attend during climate, and are ready to fight for it, as well as for all the
their period of menstruation, thereby increasing their other aspects which might improve their livelihoods.
attendance. They understand that water must be managed in an
integrated way, taking into consideration the source
Adapting water supply in semi-arid Brazil (rain, surface water, soil and ground water), and water
through rainwater harvesting uses (for environment, domestic, agricultural and
The semi-arid region of Brazil (SAB), in the northeastern emergency purposes).
part of the country, has a rainfall which can range from
below 185 mm to 974 mm between one year and the Small rainwater storage improves livelihood
next. It is concentrated within a few weeks of the year for 15 million people in China
and is associated with a high evaporation rate of 3,000 Gansu Province is one of the driest, most mountainous
mm a year. In 2005, the Ministry of National Integration and poorest regions in China. It has an annual
calculated its drought risk between 1970 and 1990 as precipitation of 330 mm while potential evaporation
being above 60%. Climate change forecasts indicate is as high as 1,500-2,000 mm. Rain is the only water
that the drier parts of the SAB will become even drier, available and reticulated water systems are not feasible
despite there being a small increase in precipitation. because of the terrain and the sparse population. This
To adapt to the current rainfall variability, more water is an area lacking in three essentials: water, food and
storage is needed in rural areas. Rainwater harvesting is fuel. This causes insecurity in both human livelihoods
one way to adapt to current and future rainfall variability. and the environment. From 1988 to 1992, research was
The Program for 1 Million Cisterns (P1MC) (Appendix conducted to find the most suitable rainwater harvesting
II case 6.3) was initiated to supply safe drinking water interventions to promote in the area. By the end of
for 1 million rural households (five million people). 1994, 22,800 updated water cellars with 2.4 million m2
With funding from the government and the private of new catchment area (tiled roof and concrete lined
sector, more than 230,000 cisterns were constructed as courtyard) had been built. A total of 28,000 families
of August 2008 with some municipalities constructing (141,000 people), 43,000 large livestock and 139,000
their own. small animals got enough water to drink.

Evaluation of the program found that the health of the Rainwater harvesting also played a significant role in
population improved through better drinking water promoting ecological and environmental conservation.
quality and time saved for women, who no longer The “Land Conversion” Program for the north and
need to fetch water over long distances to their homes northwest China, along with development of rainwater

47


Use of rainwater harvesting systems for domestic water
supply, agriculture and drought mitigation has spread to
the semi-humid and humid areas of China that suffer
from drought, such as Southwest China, the coastal
towns of Southeast China, the islands and Guangxi
Autonomous Region.

6.3 Rainwater harvesting improves
urban water security and reduces
costs

The world’s urban population increased from about 200
million (15% of world population) in 1900 to 2.9 billion
Tank no 84,625 in P1MC Gnadlinger (50% of world population) in 2000, and the number of
cities with populations in excess of 1 million increased
harvesting, increased the area of orchards. In the period from 17 in 1900 to 388 in 2000 (McGranahan et al.,
1996 to 2000, 73,300 ha of land were irrigated with 2005). As people increasingly live in cities, and as cities
water supplied through the rainwater harvesting, with act as both human ecosystem habitats and drivers of
the irrigated areas used for the planting of trees in ecosystem change, it will become increasingly important
Longnan Prefecture. In Yongjing County, 273 ha of trees to foster urban systems that contribute to human well-
were planted, using the rainwater harvesting system. being and reduce ecosystem service burdens at every
The productivity of farm land has increased, with the level. Severe environmental health problems occur
introduction of the rain water harvesting systems. Yields within urban settlements, resulting from inadequate
have improved by 20-40% in the fields, kitchen gardens access to ecosystem services, such as clean water. Many
and holdings of pigs and sheep. Species diversity has ecosystems in and around urban areas are more bio-
increased, since rainwater harvesting enables greater diverse than are rural monocultures, and they can also
diversity of crops and cropping patterns. As incomes provide food, water services, comfort, social amenities,
rise, people no longer need to degrade their landscape cultural values, and so on, particularly if they are well
to support livelihoods. One key improvement in the managed. Moreover, urban areas currently only account
environment introduced through rainwater harvesting for about 2.8% of the total land area of Earth, despite
is reduced soil erosion, which maintains better soil containing about half the world’s population.
quality on site, and reduces siltation in waterways and
dams downstream. Reduced incidences of flooding Impacts of urban hydrology on ecosystems
downstream indicate another positive effect of the Cities require large amounts of water to sustain
rainwater harvesting interventions upstream. themselves, owing to the sheer size of population and
density of housing. Up to now the most typical method
The rainwater harvesting approach that has been of meeting this demand has been to build a large dam or
adopted since the late 1980s has brought about withdraw water from groundwater sources and pipe it in
tremendous changes in the rural parts of the dry, as needed. This can be ecologically disruptive, as well
mountainous areas of China. Experiences with as costly, causing water stress in the river downstream,
rainwater harvesting during the past 20 years show and changing the biodiversity of the region. In addition,
that rainwater harvesting is a strategic and invaluable groundwater levels may decline in urban areas as a
measure for achieving integrated development in the result of increased pumping as well as extensive areas
rural areas. Statistics show that, by adopting rainwater of impermeable surfaces, with hardly any natural
harvesting techniques, 15 million people have solved infiltration. In urban areas rainwater is disposed of most
their drinking water problems and 2.6 million ha of commonly as storm flows, in underground pipes, and as
land have been irrigated. Other intermediate techniques quickly as possible. Concentrated storm flows can alter
such as rudimentary greenhouses, solar heating, and the surface water flow patterns, affect flora and fauna, and
indigenously innovated underground tanks have also potentially increase the risk of flood damage downstream.
been adopted. The lack of surface water in urban environments can

48

Water quality and health
Surface water is often contaminated through the release
of industrial and domestic effluents directly into lakes
and rivers, and from pesticide and agro-chemical run-off
from fields. In theory, rainwater is the safest of all water
sources. Although rainwater can become contaminated
through the absorption of atmospheric pollutants,
it is usually clean as it hits the earth, unless there is
atmospheric pollution from industry. The challenge
with rainwater is to keep the collection surfaces (roof
tops) and the storage facilities free from contamination
and free from mosquito breeding. With the adequate
operation and maintenance of the collection areas,
filter and tank systems, good quality water may be
obtained by collecting rainwater from rooftops. While
high-quality source water may require little or no
treatment, it is still recommended that any water used
for drinking be disinfected to ensure microbiological
safety. According to the Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
programme of WHO, maximum health benefits are
achieved if water interventions are accompanied by
sanitation and hygiene promotion.

A two-sided coin, synergy advantages
Urbanisation puts the surrounding water resources
Women fetchng water from pond UNEP/Khaka under pressure, challenging ecosystem services in
two principal ways. Firstly, the concentrated urban
cause the dry micro-climate to increase in cities, the so population demands adequate water for consumption
called ‘heat island’ effect. This leads to a greater need and sanitation needs, which requires stable and large
for cooling systems (requiring more electrical power, supplies of water, often through the use of surface
which increases CO2 emissions, etc.). water/dams or groundwater. These extractions can
threaten other landscape habitats and functions,
If climate change brings higher peaks and intensities in reducing the ecosystem’s capacity to supply things
the volume of precipitation, current stormwater drainages such as water downstream, habitat for biodiversity, and
will be too small to cope and more incidences of flooding livelihood support. Secondly, the reduced infiltration of
may occur. The problem of financing the water supply urban landscapes alters the flow downstream, and can
and wastewater infrastructure will increase as a result of increase the incidence of flooding. Rainwater harvesting
demographic changes and urban-rural settlement shifts. in urban areas can address both these negative effects.
However, we have to adapt our technologies of urban Rainwater harvesting tanks contribute to the re-
hydrology to this change in demography and climate. distribution of flows over longer temporal scales, thus
This is our chance to modernize these very important reducing the incidence of flooding downstream. The
infrastructure elements for the benefit of the economy additional effect, is that the collected rainwater is used,
and society, by making them decentralised, and thus which means that demand on other water sources can
more affordable (Hiessl, 2008). Cities have access be reduced. Many synergies between water storage and
to rainfall, which can be used to supplement water additional non-accounted positive effects have been
abstractions from surface or groundwater sources and found for rainwater harvesting projects in urban areas:
help meet demand.
• evapotranspiration from planted roofs, retention
swales and ponds, cooling down the urban heat
island effect in cities, thus improving human well-

49


• greater awareness of the ecosystem, when citizens
run their own rainwater harvesting system, thus
saving not only water, but also other natural
resources, e.g. energy. Also usable for education in
schools and universities (reducing the CO2 footprint,
mitigating climate change)

• higher concentration of sewage water in mixed
sewers, improving the functioning of centralized
sewage treatment plants resulting in cleaner outflows
to rivers (reducing the impact on ecosystems) and
less pumping energy expenditure in the plants, thus
reducing costs for the community (enhancing human
well-being in socio-financial terms) and mitigating
climate change (reducing the CO2 footprint).

The cases below provide more details and ideas,
developed in different regions of the globe.

Revival of rainwater tanks in Australia
Australia is a country that can look back on a long tradition
of rainwater utilisation. In recent years, Australia has
been facing a water crisis. Increasing population, cheap
water, and a failure to add new supplies, exacerbated by
the effects of climate change, have brought home a stark
reality: some cities have been running out of water. The
Rainwater Harvesting for domestic use on Mallorca severe water restrictions placing harsh limitations on
Island, Spain König the watering gardens and washing of cars along with a
strong personal sense of wanting to do something about
being and saving energy for cooling in hot weather the water crisis have led to a huge revival in domestic
periods (reducing the CO2 footprint, mitigating rainwater tanks. Spurred on by generous rebate
climate change) schemes, Australians just love them. Rainwater tanks
have become the latest “must have” item (Appendix II:
• energy savings due to reduced pumping Case 6.10). This has now spilled over into commercial
rainwater harvesting. For new buildings, thanks to the
• aesthetic values of architectural and landscape Green Star rating scheme, it is almost a pre-requisite to
water features, created by providing rainwater install a rainwater harvesting system.
retention on site
Approximately 30% of Australia’s urban water
• biodiversity values of planted rooftops, retention consumption is non-residential. A quarter of that could
swales and ponds, provided by rainwater retention be reduced through water efficiency measures. Of
on site, improving ecosystems even in urban areas this demand, some 8% could readily be supplied by
commercially viable rainwater harvesting schemes.
• infiltration from retention swales and ponds, Such projects can capture rainwater from 1,000 to
recharging groundwater aquifers 10,000 m2 and more. If schemes collecting storm water
(i.e. rainwater including ground surface runoff) were
• daylight reflection from retention ponds designed included, collection areas of 50,000 m2 and beyond
close to buildings, lighting up building interiors, could be achieved. Large rainwater harvesting schemes
thus helping to save energy (reducing the CO2 are of interest to hospitals, works depots, shopping
footprint, mitigating climate change) centres, tertiary institutions, military bases, prisons,

50

sports facilities and parks and gardens. The goal is to
build an integrated water supply network where the large
dam supply systems work hand in hand with thousands
of mini-dam supplies, in the form of both residential
and commercial rainwater tanks installed throughout
the municipal area. In Australia, it would also match the
area where the greatest water demands occur with the
regions enjoying the greatest rainfalls.

Decentralised water supply at Star City, Seoul
The complete dependence of city water supply
and drainage on a centralized system in the age of
steady climate change and increasing urbanization is
precarious. There are also the issues of an ageing infra- Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Woolworths
structure and increasing energy costs. These natural and RDC, Minchinbury, Sydney, Australia
man-made risks can be reduced through the addition of Hauber-Davidson
a decentralized water management system.

Star City is a major real estate development project of
more than 1,300 apartment units in Gwangjin-gu in the
eastern section of Seoul (Appendix II: Case 6.5). The
basic design idea of the Rainwater Research Center
(RRC) at Seoul National University and Professor
Mooyoung Han was to collect up to the first 100 mm
of rainwater falling on the complex and to use it for
gardening and flushing public toilets. The entire fourth
floor below the ground in Building B at Star City is used
as a water storage area. Altogether it can store 3,000 m3
of water, in three separate tanks, with a total floor area
of 1,500 m2. The capacity of each tank is 1,000 m3.
Detached houses, Macquiery Bay, Australia
The first two tanks are used to collect rainwater from König
the rooftop and the ground that mitigates the danger of a
flood in the area during the monsoon season. Collected At a broader level, because the decentralized system
rainwater is used for the purpose of water conservation. harvests rainwater on site before it becomes dirty, it
A special feature is that most of the irrigated water in reduces the energy required—and therefore the carbon
the garden is infiltrated into the ground and returns dioxide production and the long-term social cost—for
to the tank for multiple uses. The third tank is used water treatment and transportation. A cost comparison
to store tap water in the case of emergency. Fresh tap exercise on conventional and rainwater harvesting
water is maintained by decanting half of the old water systems in Seoul City indicated that the energy required
to the rainwater tank and refilling it on a regular basis. to treat and deliver a cubic metre of tap water is 0.2405
Based on the half year operation of the system, water kWh, with most of this being energy for transmission.
conservation is expected to be approximately 40,000 m3 For grey water, treated on site, this would be 1.1177
per year, which is about 67% of the annual amount of kWh per cubic metre. According to Prof. Han`s
rainfall over the Star City complex. The risk of floods calculations, the same volume of rainwater, needing
can be controlled pro-actively with the remote control no treatment, can be delivered for a mere 0.0012 kWh,
system, by emptying or filling the tanks appropriately. which is the pumping energy needed to raise the water
The third novel concept applied in this project was the from storage. The universal imperative is to provide
city government’s incentive program for the developer. water services with the lowest possible use of energy.
Upon evaluation of the Star City project, the city

51


effective. Rainwater, at a maximum temperature of
20°C, is circulated through the cistern in a closed
system, where the waste heat is re-used (König, 2008).
In 2007, with 384 m3 of additional drinking water
required during dry periods, the rainwater yield was then
2,180 m3. To this we add the 4,000 m3 of cooling water
saved every year making a total of 6,180 m3 of water
conserved (Fig. 6.1). Since January 1, 2003, the clinic
has also benefited from an amendment to the articles
of the city of Bad Hersfeld. The new rate for rainwater
per square meter of paved/sealed surface that runs off
into the sewage system is 0.66 euros/m2 throughout the
entire city. Together with the drinking water charge,
the Bad Hersfeld Clinic therefore saves €13,500 per
year through the utilization of rainwater. The operating
costs, including filter maintenance and electricity for
the rainwater pumps, are approximately offset by the
elimination of the need to soften the cooling water. The
savings in energy as a result of the installed rainwater
harvesting systems also reduce CO2 emissions, and give
the hospital a smaller carbon footprint.

Germany is among several industrialized countries
Rainwater Harvesting tank at hospital, Australia pioneering a return of this simple but cost effective
Hauber-Davidson technique, while also developing rainwater capture
systems in new and more sophisticated ways. By
government has already passed a city-wide ordinance to supplementing conventional supply, rainwater
promote more rainwater harvesting system installations harvesting has the potential to reduce big, costly and
in development projects. sometimes environmentally-questionable infrastructure
projects (Steiner, 2008).
Taskforce for environment, Bad Hersfeld,
Germany
6.4 Conclusions from case studies
A broad range of medical and care services and 577
beds make the Bad Hersfeld Clinic the center of medical Rainwater harvesting can provide additional water
competence for eastern and central Hessen. With management options for rural and urban water supply, in
approximately 1,400 employees, it is one of the largest developing and developed countries alike. Increasingly,
employers in the region. Both municipal and private examples from around the world demonstrate how
investors are examining operating costs, especially rainwater harvesting for domestic supply can positively
the costs of energy and water. Rainwater utilization address multiple issues regarding safe and reliable water
in Germany often leads to a double benefit in terms of supply, health, and even food and income security, whilst
saving money; namely, the costs for potable water and reducing negative impacts on ecosystems, such as over-
fees for rainwater disposal (McCann, 2008). abstraction of surface and ground waters, or increased
incidences of flooding. In addition, implementation can
In 1988, an “environmental task force” was established often prove less costly than many traditional, engineered
at the clinic. In the first phase of construction, in 1995, public water supply infrastructure projects.
rainwater was already utilized for outdoor watering.
In addition, a fountain and a pond were supplied with Rural water supply will continue to be a challenge
water from the cistern. Since 2001, 111 toilets have in many places, due to limited investments and lack
been connected to the rainwater system. The cooling of operation and management capacity. Rainwater
of vacuum pumps used for sterilization is especially harvesting has been shown to be an effective way of

52

harvesting system developed rapidly and has played a
great role in social and economic development over the
past 20 years.

Rainwater harvesting in urban areas does not alter
hydrological flows in appreciable quantities, as most
of the water is returned as sewerage and/or stormwater
flows. However, the storage of water may affect
downstream users, as the peak and base flows of the
discharge curves downstream may be modified. In
some instances this is positive, as it reduces incidences
Aerial image of Star City, 4 apartment towers with of flooding. In other instances it can bring negative
1,310 apartments, Seoul, Korea POSCO impacts on habitats and biodiversity. A second challenge
of rainwater harvesting (and any water use) in urban
areas is its deteriorating quality if no counter measures
are taken, when disposing the water.

Improved local management of water, especially of
rainwater, will close the loop and upgrade ecosystems
on the community scale. Synergistic effects are the
avoidance of urban flooding in the public sewer system,
slowing down of runoff from private and public grounds
(the community has to charge itself for rainwater runoff
from public areas), stimulating rainwater harvesting (thus
using less tap water) and/or infiltrating rainwater into
the groundwater and/or improving evapotranspiration
through infiltration swales, green roofs and evaporation
by retention ponds.

Site plan of the 4 towers, in total 6.25 ha in Seoul’s All of the case studies above had active policy support
City Centre, Korea POSCO in order to enable the implementation and spread of
rainwater harvesting structures. One way to increase the
implementation of rainwater harvesting is to subsidise
providing multiple benefits in rural areas, including initial investment costs. For developing countries,
health, income and food and water security benefits. In
addition, rainwater harvesting has also shown positive
synergies in ecosystem service maintenance and
enhancement, as well as being cost-efficient. Supporting
policies, community and public participation and cost-
sharing of investments are prerequisites in enabling
these synergies to develop.

To meet Millennium Development Goal targets for
sustainable access to safe drinking water and basic
sanitation in rural and urban areas we have to make
more use of local water resources. It is feasible to
use rainwater harvesting to supply rural households
with sufficient water to improve livelihoods and
sometimes even increase incomes. With appropriate Aerial image of Bad Hersfeld Clinic, Germany.
local incentives, such as in Gansu, China, the rainwater Harvesting rain from roof tops. Klinik Bad Hersfeld

53


Figure 6.1: Increasing RWH makes decreasing tap water need in Bad Hersfeld Clinic, Germany
Klinik Bad Hersfeld

Rainwater retention pond, aesthetical impact on
human wellbeing. Nuremberg Assurance Company,
office building, Nuremberg, Germany König

Vegetables from kajiado Odour/ICRAF

microfinance credit groups have great advantages.
Another is to align legislation regarding water
quality, for example, to enable utilisation of rainwater
harvesting, with suitable cleaning methods. Sharing
knowledge across borders is an effective way to
enhance and improve rainwater harvesting in different
environments. The focus is always on using appropriate
regional technologies for the sustainable operation and
maintenance of rainwater harvesting systems by the
users and local stakeholders.

54

References Steiner A. 2008. Vorwort. In: König K. W., Ratgeber
ABCMAC. 2006. Workshop Recommendations about Regenwasser. Ein Ratgeber für Kommunen und
Cistern Water Quality. Petrolina/Brazil, 2006 Planungsbüros. Vol. 2, p. 3. Mall, Donaueschingen/
DIN, 2002. English translation of DIN 1989-1:2001- Germany
10 Rainwater harvesting systems. Part 1: Planning, UNICEF. 2008. UNICEF Handbook on Water Quality.
installation, operation and maintenance. Fbr, United Nations Children`s Fund, New York/USA
Darmstadt/Germany Zhu Q. 2008. Rainwater harvesting in dry areas. The
Han M. 2008. Seoul`s Star City: a rainwater harvesting case of rural Gansu in China, in Tech Monitor, p. 24-
benchmark for Korea. Water 21, p. 17-18. Magazine 30, New Delhi/India, Sep-Oct 2008
of the International Water Association, London/UK Zhu Q. 2003. Rainwater harvesting and poverty
Gnadlinger J. 2006. Community water action in semi- alleviation: A case study in Gansu, China, in Water
arid Brazil, an outline of the factors for success Resources Development, Vol. 19, No. 4
.Official Delegate Publication of the 4th World
Water Forum, page 150 – 158, Mexico City/Mexico,
March, 16 – 22, 2006 Relevant web-sites for selected case studies
Gnadlinger J. 2008. Rainwater Harvesting Management in chapter
for Climate Change Adaptation in the Rural Area of
Semi Arid Brazil. Presentation at 3rd International www.fbr.de/english
Workshop Rainwater Harvesting and Management www.igb.fraunhofer.de/english
for Climate Change Adaptation, IWA International www.skywater.jp
Water Association Congress in Vienna/Austria, 11 www.rainwater.snu.ac.kr
September 2008 www.rainwater.org.tw/english
Hauber-Davidson, G. 2008. Große www.abcmac.org.br/english
Regenwassersammelanlagen am anderen www.fakt-consult.de
Ende der Welt. In fbr-wasserspiegel 4/08, p.
18-20. Fachvereinigung für Betriebs- und
Regenwassernutzung fbr, Darmstadt/Germany
Hiessl H. 2008. Klimawandel und demografischer
Wandel als Herausforderung und Chance. In: König
K. W., Ratgeber Regenwasser. Ein Ratgeber für
Kommunen und Planungsbüros. Vol. 2, p. 6. Mall,
Donaueschingen/Germany
König K. W. 2008. Wirtschaftlichkeit contra Hygiene?
Regenwassernutzung im Krankenhaus. In: TAB
Technik am Bau,10/2008, p. 78 – 81. Bauverlag,
Gütersloh/Germany
McCann, B. 2008. Global prospects of rainwater
harvesting. In: Water 21, p. 12-14. Magazine of the
International Water Association, London/UK
McGranahanG.etal.2005.UrbanSystems.In:Ecosystems
and Human Well-Being, Current State and Trends,
Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series Vol. 1,
Chapter 27, Island Press, Washington DC/USA
Ministry of the Environment, Secretariat of Water
Resources. 2006. National Plan of Water Resources
1st vol., Brasilia
Silva A de S. et al. 2006. Environmental Evaluation of
the Performance of the Cisterns Program of MDS and
ASA: Executive Summary. EMBRAPA, Brasilia

55


CHAPTER 7

Rainwater harvesting providing adaptation
opportunities to climate change

Main author: Jessica Calfoforo Salas, Kahublagan sang Panimalay Fnd, Iloilo City, Philippines

Klaus W. König, Überlingen, Germany
Andrew Lo, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan

7.1. Introduction
agriculture and energy generation. In Asia, freshwater
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) availability is expected to decrease by 2050 affecting
provided a baseline on the state of our ecosystem over a billion people. This projection covers Central,
services. The scenario for the future looks grim given South, East and South-East Asia. The onset of water
the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment’s finding stress comes earlier in Africa. By 2020, between 75
that 60% of the world’s ecosystem services have and 250 million people are projected to be affected by
degraded or are being used unsustainably. Many of the increased water stress in this region, in particular in the
degraded ecosystem services were stated to be caused Mediterranean region in the northern and the southern
by increased agricultural outputs and expansion. An parts of the continent.
additional challenge is the 370 million people who were
undernourished during the period 1997 to 1999. This In addition to changing patterns to rainfall amounts,
figure increased to 852 million during the period 2000 the rainfall events may become more intense (IPCC,
to 2002. These marginalized groups are largely found in 2007). This may affect incidences of flooding and
South East Asia and the Sub-Saharan Africa. droughts, making the supply of freshwater ecosystem
services more unreliable. The Millennium Ecosystem
With the increasing rate of rise in the earth’s temperature, Assessment (2005) examined the regulating services of
the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC (2007) the ecosystem, and, out of the ten regulating ecosystem
projected that by 2020 yields from rainfed agriculture services, seven were found to be in decline. In water
in some countries in Africa could be reduced by up regulation, according to the report, positive and
to 50%. With agricultural production and access to negative impact varies depending on ecosystem change
food adversely affected, malnutrition and hunger will and location. However, the numbers of flood incidences
increase. In Latin America, there is medium confidence continue to rise. The centralized water system is the first
in a projection that the number of people at risk of system to suffer collapse upon the onset of a natural
hunger will increase as productivity of important crops disaster. The GEO4 (2007) reports that one likely impact
and livestock declines, especially in tropical and sub- of climate change will be higher incidence of natural
tropical parts of the continent. disasters, such as droughts and floods. Two thirds of all
natural hazards relate to hydro-meteorological events,
The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2007) such as floods, windstorms and high temperatures.
further states that by mid-century, small islands can be between 1992 and 2001 1.2 billion people were affected
expected to suffer from reduced water supplies to the by floods.. Ninety per cent of the people exposed to
point where they become insufficient to meet demands, natural hazards reside in the developing countries
especially during low rainfall periods. In Latin America, (GEO4, 2007).
changes in precipitation patterns and the disappearance
of glaciers are expected to significantly affect fresh Degradation of ecosystem services in the face of the
water availability thus affecting human consumption, demands of an increasing population often results in

56

difficult trade-offs, sometimes developing into conflicts. generated green house gases and consumption of
Sometimes, too, it forces people to migrate to even more goods and services that involve energy consumption or
degraded areas, which further contributes to increasingly biochemical generation of green house gases. The total
unsustainable utilization of natural resources. This mass of green house gas emission associated with the
perpetuates the vicious cycle of destroying ecosystems, end user of water including upstream and downstream
reducing ecosystem services for these environmental activities was calculated as 7,146 kg CO2-equivalents
refugees, increasing their vulnerability, pushing them per household per year. If we compare this carbon
into abject poverty and decreasing levels of human footprint with the most common reference made on the
well-being. gas emissions of fuel used in driving a car, the car’s
green house gas emissions are only 4,500 kg CO2-
equivalents each year per 15,000 miles, according
7.2 The role of rainwater harvesting
to the Australian Greenhouse Office. In a study of
Rainwater harvesting is one effective water technology the rainwater harvesting carbon footprint in New
for adaptation to increased variability in water supply Zealand, the green house gas emissions from the use
and rainfall. Its decentralized nature allows the owners of a rainwater tank system was estimated at 2,300 kg
to benefit from direct management of demand as well CO2 equivalents per household per year (Mithraratne
as supply. With support technologies (modern and and Vale, 2007). Different combinations of tanks
indigenous), rainwater harvesting is cost effective, with demand management affects the size of the CO2
and can release capital needed in times of disasters of equivalent emissions related to the rainwater harvesting
surprising magnitudes. There also are savings of costs system used.
related to rainwater harvesting using simple processes
and therefore infrastructure, including the pumps and In Melbourne, another study was undertaken to come
energy inputs needed. This also reduces greenhouse up with a method for achieving a climate-neutral Water
gas emissions related to water supplies. Rainwater Saving Framework (Blunt and Holt, 2007). It was
harvesting technology can therefore contribute to both found that potable water, using rainwater and other
climate change mitigation and adaptation. conservation devices, generates 0.173 CO2t/ml while
a wastewater treatment plant or wastewater recycling
Rainwater harvesting reducing CO2 plant generates 0.875 CO2t/ml. Thus, saving water can
emissions? save green house gas emissions. In addition, substantial
The Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC itself green house gas savings could be made by addressing
indicated that the expanded use of rainwater harvesting wastewater management, in addition to the rainwater
and other “bottom-up” technologies have the potential harvesting intervention.
of reducing emissions by around 6 Gt CO2 equivalent/
year in 2030 (IPCC, 2007).
In a case of a German industrial company (Appendix II:
The system of water delivery in the context of current Case 7.4) rainwater harvesting lowered CO2 emissions
infrastructure development is part of the contributing and energy and water costs. Huttinger Elektronik
system for green house gas emissions. The study of equipped its two-storey production and office
Flower et al. (2007) suggested that the main public building, built on 34,000 m2 lot, with the following
water systems contribute to climate change by direct improvements:
emissions of green house gases from water storage
reservoirs and water treatment processes and through • cooling towers for cooling work spaces
significant energy and material uses in the system. A
case study from Melbourne, Australia, showed that • rainwater for washing the company’s street cars,
appliances associated with residential end users of
water have higher green house gas emissions than all • rainwater for flushing toilets
upstream-downstream emissions. The contribution of
an urban water system to climate change comes from • rain gardens through which excess rainwater
three sources: consumption of energy derived from percolated into the ground
carbon-based fuels, bio-diesel processes which directly

57


• rainwater for the spray system of the re-cooling local challenges of water, healthy ecosystem services and
units of the building human well-being. These and other cases will continue
to serve as examples of adaptation strategies to climate
• well water for cooling the offices variability, with multiple benefits. In the Philippines
(Appendix II: Case 7.1), farmers in rainfed areas who
• rainwater for irrigation and evaporation purposes. use rainwater collected in ponds were able to raise their
production yields from an average of 2.2 tons/hectare to
• cool water distributed through a double-pipe system an average of 3.3 tons/hectare with a high of 4.68 tons/
without the customary refrigeration machinery. hectare. The average yield from irrigated lands in the
area is 3.3 tons/hectare. Considering the development
With the above combination of technologies, based on costs of dams and irrigation canals, the government
the use of rainwater, the company was able to save the spends about US$5,000 to irrigate one hectare of land. A
equivalent cost of energy corresponding to 56,664 litres farmer may spend around US$400 to water one hectare
a year of heating oil or a reduction of an equivalent of rice land. Added to the cost of the infrastructure could
of 318 tonnes of CO2. In the case of using rainwater be the value of lost farm land, made into an irrigation
for cooling purposes, the savings amounted to 98,147 pond, which the farmers estimated to be a loss equal to
litres of heating oil with an equivalent reduction in about 300 kilograms of rice (Salas, 2008).
CO2 emissions of 551 tonnes (König, 2008). This
computation of CO2 emission equivalents is limited Many experiences documented how rainwater
to the savings generated by fuel oil used and has not harvesting conserved groundwater. The Ghogha project
included the impacts on other parts of the production in rural Gujarat, India (Appendix II: Case 7.2) reported
system. having successfully recharged the groundwater using
276 recharge structures in 82 villages (Khurana and
Current adaptation strategies to climate Seghal,). India maintains a Central Groundwater Board
variability and ecosystem management which oversees artificial recharge of groundwater both
Finding No. 3 of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment in rural and urban areas. According to Singh (2001),
stated that the degradation of ecosystem services the green revolution in Punjab and Haryana contributed
could grow significantly worse during the first half significantly to India’s food security but at the expense of
of this century and that such degradation is a barrier soil and water degradation. The increase in groundwater
to achieving the Millennium Development Goals. use for agriculture between 1965 and 1995 resulted in
However, Finding No. 4 stated that, “The challenge of a groundwater table decline of 2 meters. Alarmed by
reversing the degradation of ecosystems while meeting this situation, the Central Ground Water Authority
increasing demands for their services can be partially planned for groundwater recharge and rooftop rainwater
met under some scenarios that the MA considered, but harvesting in another rainwater harvesting project in
these involve significant changes in policies, institutions, India. The Central Ground Water Authority reported
and practices that are not currently under way. Many that an additional 215 billion m3 of groundwater can be
options exist to conserve or enhance specific ecosystem generated by harvesting and recharging only 11% of the
services in ways that reduce negative trade-offs or that surplus runoff.
provide positive synergies with other ecosystem services”
(MA, 2005). It is also expected that many ecosystem Drinking water is another product of ecosystem services.
services will be more vulnerable and fragile as climate As a result of the decline in the earth’s freshwater
change affects rainfall patterns and increases surface ecosystems and the related socio-economic factors,
temperatures. Rainwater harvesting will continue to be 1.1 billion people do not have access to improved
one way to adapt to these increased changes in water water supplies and more than 2.6 billion lack access to
supply and rainfall variability in the future, and, at the improved sanitation. Also, water demand has increased
same time, enhance ecosystem services. and water supply has decreased. The ratio of water use
to accessible supply increases by 20% every ten years
Several illustrations and case studies have been (MA, 2005). Rainwater harvesting can help communities
presented in the previous chapters, which highlight the adapt to the declining availability of drinking water as
contributions of rainwater harvesting to adaptation to the droughts affect more semi-arid areas and floods inundate

58

water sources and centralized water systems. The Thai
Royal Government declared a policy of water resources
development in 1979 to improve people’s well-being
and adapt to current rainfall variability (Appendix II:
Case 7.5). The program supported construction of jars
and tanks for augmenting drinking water supplies.
Because of this program, the country was the first to
attain water sufficiency during that water decade.
After 10 years, 8 million tanks had been constructed.
Most households have 1 ferrocement tank, a Thai jar
and a membership in a community tank group. Private
sector competition brought prices down and increased
market availability of jars. However, education lagged
behind and incidences of diarrhea became prevalent as Flood-damaged main pipe for potable water for the
health measures for keeping the tanks potable were not City of Iloilo. Kahublagan
followed (Ariyabandu, 2001). A lesson to be learned
is that when business interests are strong, government
control over standards and community vigilance must
be monitored.

The 1981 rainwater catchment systems program in
Capiz, Philippines (Appendix II: Case 7.3) was accepted
by local governments and the communities. The data
from 2002 taken by the Planning and Development
Office of the province showed an average of 67.5% the
population using rainwater in 10 towns with inadequate
groundwater resources. Three towns registered the 90%
mark for the population using rainwater, according to
the Planning and Development Office. The adoption
of rainwater harvesting was a necessity to enable high
After the flood at Tigum-Aganan Watershed
quality water for domestic supply, as the groundwater
Philippines. Kahublagan
was too low and sometimes too saline, and local springs
were often contaminated by pollutants including
agrochemicals (Salas, 2003). Can rainwater harvesting mitigate soil erosion, which
is one of the big drivers of ecosystems degradation?
The cases have shown that rainwater harvesting can make Terraces (in situ rainwater harvesting technologies)
significant contributions to Millennium Development in the Philippines have been key rainwater harvesting
Goal No. 7 to ensure environmental sustainability. technologies used especially in the upland and rainfed
For example, the contribution of a decentralized water agricultural areas. They have helped control erosion.
system such as rainwater harvesting to green house gas The recent typhoon (June 2007) which ravaged Panay
emission is far less than that of the current centralized Island and the landslides that brought down uprooted
water systems being used. Rainwater harvesting can trees from the old growth forest in the mountains into
contribute to water pollution control by capturing the cities on the coast, showed how terraced hillsides
rain and using it or recharging it to groundwater. With could have withstood the landslides and excessive rains.
rainwater being used, more surface water is conserved In the experience of the Tigum-Aganan Watershed,
for use in aquatic ecosystem services and less Philippines, the flood crisis turned into a water crisis as
groundwater is extracted. Use of rainwater harvesting the city’s main water supply pipe from the watershed
for agro-forestry, in the forests, and on farms reduces broke down. The problem continued to linger as more
soil erosion which is beneficial to the soils as well as to silt was carried by the river even 6 months after the
downstream water users. flooding. As a result, the business of trucking water

59


from various deep wells flourished. The urban poor
suffered the most from the disrupted water supply service.
Households with rainwater tanks were less affected by
the water crisis. The farmers suffered too as they could
not use silted irrigation water for their farms. But there
were farmers who had adopted rainwater harvesting
techniques who had adequate water for drinking and for
growing crops during the cropping season. Those who
had not adopted rainwater harvesting facilities missed a
growing season.

Water purification is another ecosystem service rendered
by the regulating function of water flowing through the
landscape. Generally, the water purification function
of ecosystem services is declining, according to the Simple rain water harvesting can supply clean
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA, 2005). One drinking water in times of flooding in Bihar Prasad
source of polluted water is stormwater runoff. A recent
practice is to collect rainwater to prevent stormwater harvesting as a water supply technique. It was learned
from bringing pollution down the drainage ways and the that rainwater harvesting tanks, more than modern water
sewer or directly into the river and the seas. Urbanization equipment, are necessary life support systems in new
leads to significant changes in hydrology and pollutant settlements for the refugees (Barton, 2009).
transport from catchments which could harm sensitive
aquatic ecosystems. An example to address the stormwater
7.3 The role of rainwater harvesting
pollution in urban design is to introduce stormwater
for climate change adaptation in
harvesting above the wetlands in Wyong-Warnervale,
domestic water supply
Australia (Leinster and White, 2007). The design was
effective in assisting the water purification process and Prof. George Kuczera of the University of Newcastle
stormwater management. (2007) studied the impact of roofwater harvesting
used to supplement public water supplies in an urban
The increasing risk of natural and man-made catastrophic setting in Sydney, Australia. He stressed the fact that
events has been a growing niche for water provision in water reservoirs were vulnerable to prolonged drought
a decentralised manner with limited costs. In northern and climate change which reduces rainfall amounts in
Bihar, India, recurrent floods turned communities into catchments. The consequences of such occurrences for
temporary migrants, with insufficient supplies of potable a large urban area could be catastrophic. In Sydney, the
water. They traditionally had abundant water supplies as annual rainfall average is 900 mm to 1,200 mm. The
a result of the multiple floods, so rainwater harvesting study aimed at providing insights on the drought security
was not an indigenous coping strategy to access drinking performance of an integrated regional water supply and
water. However, when flooding occurs, wells are roofwater harvesting system. The base scenario, with 800
contaminated by floodwater. By implementing low-cost GL/year annual demand, suggested that a prolonged 10-
rainwater harvesting for drinking and sanitation purposes, year drought could bring about a complete failure of the
communities and individuals stay healthy during times of system. However, with 50% of the households having a
crisis (Appendix II: Case 7.3). After a famine in Turkana 5,000 litre rainwater tank, the probability that there will be
(1980), in the northwest of Kenya, the people’s priority a restriction of demand would be 8.5% to 5.2% in any year.
was construction of rainwater tanks after the immediate The probability of any household running out of water in
need for food was satisfied. ITDG got involved in the any given year would be 0.05% to 0.02%. With a backup
design of a system that would utilize any type of surface desalination plant, the integrated system survived the 10-
for catching water. When project fund was exhausted, the year drought. The study arrived at the conclusion that
community started building stone lines and grass strips roof-water harvesting can make a substantial contribution
to catch water. The level of innovation was high in this as an adaptation technology and reduce the vulnerability
Turkana community, given the flexibility of rainwater of water supply in urban areas.

60

Working from the results of earlier studies on centralized scenarios of climate change. Climate and culture are
water supplies (Coombes and Kuzera, 2003; Coombes inextricably linked (Pandey et al., 2003). Changes in
and Lucas, 2006), a follow-on study proceeded to look climate will eventually change people’s ways of doing
into the efficiency of two types of water catchments in the things, but hopefully not with much suffering and pain.
climate change scenarios of Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne Changes in ways of doing things could be introduced
and Perth. The result, with the exception of Perth, was that gently in the way people live, as in the case of using
catchments exhibited a disproportionate decrease in yield rainwater harvesting to supplement or provide water
in response to rainfall reductions as compared to the yields supplies. We need to actively develop adaptation
from the rainwater tanks. The authors concluded that the measures, as well as continue with mitigation efforts,
analysis strongly suggested that there is a significant to meet the challenges of water supply and demand in a
difference in the response to climate change of the two future of climate change. Rainwater harvesting already
systems for collecting water from rooftops or from provides cost efficient adaptation to variable supplies
catchments. The centralized water catchment systems of water.
supplying dams were seen as more sensitive, particularly
in reduced runoff during reduced runoff periods, and While there are abundant examples of rainwater
hence potentially more susceptible to failure. harvesting in developed and developing contexts, for
multiple purposes, there is still a lack of synthesised
A number of cases on rainwater harvesting illustrate information: what are the investment costs? Who gains
rainwater harvesting as an effective strategy to reduce and who loses? Which impacts on the biophysical and
vulnerability amongst local users to an unexpected lack social economic systems were positive? To answer
of water. This suggests that one adaptation strategy these and other questions, there is a need to “stock up”
to both short- and long-term variability in rainfall on knowledge products for dissemination to all levels
should be to actively work on decentralized water of end users. The momentum gained to date must be
storage technologies, flexible to adopt and adapt in relentlessly sustained by network building.
multiple user contexts. Joining the praises for rainwater
harvesting is the Executive Director of the United Enabling policies for rainwater harvesting uptake and
Nations Environment Programme who declared: implementation are a first step for increased adoption.
To move from a centralized to a decentralized water
►►“As we look into what Africa can do to adapt to climate system, for example, is not an impossible task but one
change … rainwater harvesting is one of those steps that that needs sustained efforts of rationalization, planning,
does not require billions of dollars, that does not require implementation and adjustment. It is recommended that
international conventions first – it is a technology, a responsible global bodies take on the task of assisting
management approach, to provide water resources at the countries to mainstream rainwater harvesting in their
community level.” policy agendas. This effort should be supported by
education, technical exchanges, and capacity building
Indeed, rainwater harvesting has come of age. The efforts which are institutionalized to assist countries
technology has matured and the world condition is in who are ready to venture onward with a change in the
such state that it needs this technology to heal itself, historic paradigm and culture for water availability
to protect what natural assets that have remained, and climate change protection. However, such changes
and to start anew, beginning with the simplicity and should be undertaken from a position of understanding
appropriateness of this humble technology. and knowledge of the potential benefits and risks of
using rainwater harvesting, including the human benefits
7.4 Recommendations and key and environmental costs of diverting flows from surface
messages and ground waters.

Various studies have shown the positive values and
opportunities offered by rainwater harvesting which
could be harnessed by people to help face periods of
severe variability in weather and other geophysical
events, such as those predicted under the various

61


References
Ariyabandu, R.D.S. 2001. Rainwater Jar Programme in
North East Thailand. DTU, UK
Barton, T. Rainwater Harvesting in Turkana: water
case study. Practical Action Consulting website last
accessed January 2009
Blunt, S., Holt, P. 2007. Climate Neutral Water Saving
Schemes. Rainwater and Urban Design Conference,
IRCSA XIII Conference. Sydney, Australia,
Flower, D.J.M., Mitchell, V.G., Codner, G.P. 2007.
Urban water systems: Drivers of climate change?
Rainwater and Urban Design 2007, IRCSA XIII
Conference. Sydney, Australia,
Global Environment Outlook: environment for
development (GEO 4). 2007. A report of the United
Nations, UNEP/Progress Press, Malta
IPCC. 2007. Summary for Policymakers: An Assessment
of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change,
Valencia Spain
Kuczera, G. 2007. Reginal Impacts of Roofwater
Harvesting – Supplementing Public Water Supply.
Paper presented at the Rainwater Colloquium in
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Khurana, I., Sehgal, M. Drinking Water Source
Sustainability and Ground water Quality
Improvement in Rural Gujarat, Mainstreaming
Rainwater Harvesting IRCSA conference. Loc. cit.
Leinster, S., White, G. 2007. Stormwater to the Rescue:
Regional Stormwater Harvesting for Ecosystem
Protection and Potable Water Yield.” Rainwater and
Urban Design Conference, IRCSA XIII Conference.
Sydney, Australia, August, 2007
Millennium Ecosystems Assessment. 2005: Ecosystems
and Human Well-being Synthesis. Island Press.
Washington D.C.
Mithraratne, N., Vale, R. 2007. Rain Tanks or Reticulated
Water Supply? Rainwater and Urban Design 2007,
IRCSA XIII Conference. Sydney, Australia,
Pandey, D.N., Gupta, A.K., Anderson, D.M. 2003.
Rainwater harvesting as an adaptation to climate
change. Current Science. Vol. 85:1
Salas, J.C. 2003. An Exploratory Study on Rainwater
Harvesting in the Philippines: A Report to the World
Bank.
Salas, J.C. 2008. Report to the Tigum Aganan Watershed
Management Board. Iloilo City Philippines.
Singh, R.B. 2001. Impact of Land Use Change on
Ground Water in Punjab and Haryana Plains. Impact
of Human Activity on Groundwater Dynamics, Hans
Gehrels et al., (Eds). IAHS, Oxfordshire, UK

62

chapter 8

Summary of chapters and case studies


8.1 Positive effects rainwater authors point out that, although no cost-benefit analyses
harvesting and ecosystem services have been done, the additional pressures likely to have
Healthy ecosystems provide a range of essential human been introduced by withdrawing water from surface
well-being products and services. The water supply is and ground water sources would have had even greater
essential both for human well-being and for productive negative impacts on ecosystem services. Thus, it is
ecosystem services. In this publication, rainwater recognised that a trade-off may have to be negotiated.
harvesting has been discussed from an ecosystem Rainwater harvesting is no ‘silver bullet’ but the cases
perspective. The emerging picture is that different and experiences reported here indicate that it can have
rainwater harvesting interventions can have positive several benefits that may off-set the potential negative
effects both on ecosystem services and human well- impacts.
being, thereby creating synergies in desired and positive
development paths. The chapters and cases suggest that the area of most
promise of benefit from rainwater harvesting is that
The positive effects of rainwater harvesting are of domestic supply in rural developing areas, where
related to the increased provisioning capacity of the livelihoods are closely linked to local landscape
ecosystem services. The primary services are the production. Rainwater harvesting for domestic supply
provision of more water of better quality for domestic appears in all cases to have positive impacts on a range
supply and for increased crop production (Fig. of human well-being indicators as well as on ecosystem
8.1). Secondary benefits relate to the regulating and services. Especially provisioning capacity improves,
supporting ecosystem services (Fig. 8.2). The three both through access to harvested water, but also through
key services mentioned are: (1) reduced soil erosion the different in situ interventions that recharge the
improved infiltration capacity into the soil, and reduced soil and shallow groundwater systems. The increased
incidences of flash floods/downstream flooding (2) storage of water often enables women, in particular, to
recharge of shallow groundwater, springs and stream increase small-scale gardening activities, improving
flows, and (3) increased species diversity amongst flora diets, possibly health and very often incomes. The
and fauna. In addition, some cases have discussed the impacts on erosion control and reduced flooding/flash
positive impacts of rainwater harvesting through noting floods are mentioned as being desirable and positive.
the reduced energy requirements (in terms of reduced
CO2 emissions) of rainwater harvesting as compared to A second area of positive benefit of rainwater harvesting
conventional water supply technologies. An important on ecosystem services and human well-being is in
but not always mentioned affect is on the aesthetic and urban areas. Here, the effects on ecosystem services
cultural ecosystem services, where rainwater harvesting are mainly related to reduced pressures for withdrawals
has improved both rural and urban area vegetation for from groundwater and surface water, and reduced
improved human well-being. incidences of flooding downstream. The key human
well-being effects are related to direct income gains
In a few case the trade-off effect is discussed (e.g., (reduced costs for public or private water supply, and
Athi River, Kenya; Gansu, China). In these cases, also reduced CO2 emissions as rainwater harvesting
rainwater harvesting does impact local water flows, reduces energy demands).
possibly reducing water flows downstream through the
consumptive use of the harvested rainfall. However, the

63


Figure 8.1: Summary of impacts on provisioning ecosystem services in the rainwater harvesting cases (n=27
cases, only respondent cases included, Appendix II)

Figure 8.2: Summary of impacts on supporting/regulating ecosystem services in the rainwater harvesting
cases (n=27 cases, only respondent cases included, Appendix II)

Even though most cases and chapters presented here of impacts both on the ecosystem services as well as
reflect the positive gains in ecosystem services, there human well-being.
are also cases which report negative impacts through
increased rainwater harvesting for consumptive
8.2 Human well-being improving with
uses, such as crop production or species cultivation
gains in ecosystem services
that is more water intensive than previous crops. A
caution for implementation of rainwater harvesting Human well-being gains are evident as the ecosystem
is warranted especially in increasingly water stressed services improve in response to changes in ecosystem
locations. Here, additional rainwater harvesting may provisioning and supporting capacities. In all cases,
affect other uses of water, either for provisioning and positive effects were mentioned, at least to one of the
supporting ecosystem services, and/or for withdrawals four categories of poverty, income, health and gender.
downstream. Implementation of rainwater harvesting for However, more negative impacts were mentioned
multiple purposes should be done with due assessments especially relating to health, gender and equity of labour

64

Figure 8.3: Summary of impacts on human well-being indicators in the rainwater harvesting cases (n=27
cases, only respondent cases included, Appendix II)

and increased income generated from the rainwater well-being but also a range of ecosystem services,
harvesting (Fig. 8.3). Although there may be negative both directly and indirectly (Gansu, China; North East
effects on part of a community (determined by gender, Thailand; Kaijado, Kenya; North East Brazil).
income or land access, for example), no cases reported
only negative effects on the four human well-being
categories. An additional positive effect especially
mentioned in the rainwater harvesting interventions for
rural domestic and agricultural purposes at the farm-
scale and watershed-scale was the building of human
and social capital to undertake other development
activities. When rainwater harvesting was implemented
in a community, it also strengthened community
coherence through the formation of interest groups,
working groups or micro finance groups.

In addition, the decentralized nature of rainwater
harvesting was mentioned as a positive side-effect, which
reduced reliance on public (or private) water supply
systems. This is advantageous both in rural areas, where
scattered households make water supply service costly
and sometimes nearly impossible (i.e., Gansu, China;
North East Brazil) due to local biophysical conditions.
It is also used as means of reducing vulnerability to
interrupted water supply, especially in regions prone
to earthquakes or other natural hazards that can disrupt
public water supplies (Star City, South Korea; Sumida
City, Japan; Capiz, Philippines).

Although the cost-benefit analyses are rarely available,
the cases and chapters presented suggest that rainwater
harvesting can be a comparatively inexpensive
investment and fast option to improve not only human

65


chapter 9

Key messages and suggestions

9.1 Key messages 9.2 Suggestions

• Ecosystem services are fundamental for human
well-being, and are the basis of rural livelihoods, • Consider rainfall as an important, manageable
particularly for the poor. Rainwater harvesting resource in water management policies, strategies
can serve as an opportunity to enhance ecosystem and plans. Then rainwater harvesting interventions
productivity, thereby improving livelihoods, human can be included as potential options in land and
well-being and economies. water resource management activities for human
well-being and ecosystem productivity.
• Rainwater harvesting has been shown to create
synergies between landscape management and • Realise that rainwater harvesting is not a ‘silver
human well-being. These synergies are particularly bullet’, but can be effective as a complementary and
obvious when rainwater harvesting improves viable alternative to large-scale water withdrawals,
rainfed agriculture, is applied in watershed and as a way of reducing the negative impacts on
management, and when rainwater harvesting ecosystem services, not least in emerging water-
interventions address household water supplies in stressed basins.
urban and rural areas.
• Rainwater harvesting is a local intervention, with
• Rainwater harvesting has often been a neglected primarily local benefits on ecosystems and human
opportunity in water resource management: only livelihoods. Stakeholder consultations and public
water from surface and ground water sources are participation are key to enabling the negotiation of
conventionally considered. Managing rainfall the positive and negative trade-offs that may emerge.
will also present new management opportunities, Rainwater harvesting interventions should always
including rainwater harvesting. be compared with alternative water management
interventions and infrastructure investments.
• Improved water supply, enhanced agricultural
production and sustainable ecosystem services • Access and the right to land can be a first step
can be attained through adoption of rainwater toward implementing rainwater harvesting.
harvesting with relatively low investments over Special measures should be in place so rainwater
fairly short time spans (5-10 years). harvesting benefits the land-poor and the landless
in communities.
• Rainwater harvesting is a coping strategy in
variable rainfall areas. In the future climate change • Establish enabling policies and cost–sharing
will increase rainfall variability and evaporation, strategies (including subsides) to be provided
and population growth will increase demand together with technical know-how and capacity
on ecosystem services, in particular for water. building.
Rainwater harvesting will become a key intervention
in adaptation and reducing vulnerabilities.

• Awareness and knowledge of ecosystem services
must be increased amongst practitioners and policy
makers alike, to realise the potentials of rainwater
harvesting and ecosystem benefits for human well-
being.

66

Acknowledgements

This report was funded jointly by UNEP and SEI.
Grants were provided by FORMAS. In addition, DHI,
supported key activities in the preparation. We would
like to thank the chapter authors, and the contributing
authors for their input to this publication. The editor
and authors are especially grateful for the reviewer
comments

67

Provisioning Supporting /regulating Aesthetic & GHG emmission
cultural HUMAN WELLBEING INDICATORS

68
On-farm: crops
Off-farm: -soil -water -biodiversity Poverty Income Health Gender
water

1 India, Madyah Pradesh + + + + + + + +? +?
2 Denmark, Arhus + + +? + -? -?
3 India, Karnataka - -
4 South Africa??
5 India, Sukhomajri + + + + + + + +/- +/- + +
APPENDIX I

6 Kenya, Athi flower +/- +? + +/- +/- +/- + + +
7 Tanzania, Makanya + + + +/- + + +/- +/-
8 Morocco, Sekkouma-Irzaine + + + + + + + +?
9 Mauretania, Assaba-Kiffa + + + + + + + + + +
10 Southern Africa Miombo + + + +
11 West Africa: parklands + + + + + + +? + + +?
12 Burkina Faso + + + + + +
and human well-being

13 Kenya, Kaijado + +? + + + + + +
14 Kenya + + + + + +
15 Uganda + + + +
16 Brazil, NE semi-arids + + + + + + + + +
17 China, Gansu + + + + + + + + + + +
18 South Korea, Star city + + + + + + +?
19 Germany, Bavaria + + + + + + +
20 Germany, Knittlingen + + + +? + +/-
21 Japan, Sumida City + + + + + +?
22 Taiwan, Taipei + + + + + +? +
23 Australia Sydney + + + + +
24 Philippines, Tigum Aganan + + + +/- + +/- + +/- +/- +/-
25 Philippines, Capiz + + + + +? + + + +
26 India, Bihar + + + + +
27 Germany, Freiburg + + + + + +
28 Thailand +? +? + + + + + +/- +?

Rainwater harvesting case information: Indicators on ecosystem services

Case Water- Rural, urban Climate
Case Agriculture Forestry Contributing author
number shed supply change
India, Madyah Pradesh 3.1 X (X) (X) Eklavya Prasad, Luisa Cortesi
Denmark, Arhus 3.2 X (X) Mogens Dyhr-Nielsen
India, Karnataka 3.3 X (X) literature
APPENDIX II

South Africa?? 3.4 X (X) (X) (X) (X) literature
India, Sukhomajri 4.1 (X) X (X) (X) Bharat Sharma
Kenya, Athi flower 4.2 (X) X X Farai Madziva
Tanzania, Makanya 4.3 X (X) (X) Filbert F. Rwehumbiza, Siza D. Tumbo
Morocco, Sekkouma-Irzaine 4.4 (X) X (X) (X) Bouitfirass, M
Mauretania, Assaba-Kiffa 4.5 (X) X (X) (X) Boufaroua. M., El Mourid, M., ould Salem, A.
Southern Africa Miombo 5.1 (X) X Anders Malmer
West Africa: parklands 5.2 (X) (X) X (X) Anders Malmer
Burkina Faso 5.3 (X) X (X) Literature: Reij et al., 2003
Kenya 6.1 (X) X Hans Hartung
Uganda 6.2 (X) X Hans Hartung
Brazil, NE semi-arids 6.3 (X) X (X) Johann Gnadlinger
China, Gansu 6.4 (X) X Zhu Quiang
South Korea 6.5 (X) X (X) Mooyoung Han
Germany, Bavaria 6.6 X (X) Klaus W. König
Germany, Knittlingen 6.7 X (X) Harald Hiessl
Japan, 6.8 (X) X (X) Andrew Lo
Taiwan, Taipei 6.9 (X) X Andrew Lo
X: principal relevance of case study in chapter, (X): additional relevance a/o linkages

Australia Sydney Günter Hauber-Davidson,
Philippines, Tigum Aganan 7.1 (X) (X) X Jessica Salas
India, Gujarat 7.2 (X) X X Jessica Salas
Philippines, Capiz 7.3 (X) X Jessica Salas
India, Bihar 7.3 (X) X Eklavya Prasad, Luisa Cortesi
Guide of case studies: relevance in chapters and contributing authors

Germany, Freiburg 7.4 X Klaus W. König
Thailand 7.5 (X) (X) X Andrew Lo
Australia several (X) X literature

69

www.unep.org
United Nations Environment Programme
P.O. Box 30552 Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: (254 20) 7621234
Fax: (254 20) 7623927
Email: uneppub@unep.org
web: www.unep.org

Division of Environmental Policy Implementation

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)

P.O. Box 30552

Nairobi, Kenya

Tel: [+245] 20 762 3508

Fax: [+245] 20 762 3917

email: depiinfo@unep.org

www.unep.org/depi/ www.sei.se

Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Project Managers & Implementing Agencies

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Similar to Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Project Managers & Implementing Agencies (20)

More from D7Z (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Project Managers & Implementing Agencies