SlideShare a Scribd company logo
TANK WATER LEVEL 
CONTROLLER. 
SHEKHAR GEHLAUT. 
AKANSHA RAUTELA 
ADITYA GOEL
WATER LEVEL CONTROLER 
• Water level controller is used to control the 
water level in a tank. 
• In many industries like chemical, there is a 
restriction on liquid level of a container in such 
cases level controller can maintain level of the 
liquid at desired value.
WATER LEVEL CONTROL. 
• There are two methods to control the water level. 
i. Manual. 
ii. Automatic.
i. Manual method.
Working of manual method. 
• The purpose of this system is to maintain the liquid level 
(h) in the tank as close to the desired liquid level H as 
possible, even when the output flow rate is varied by 
opening the valve. 
• In manual method a human controls the liquid level 
close to the desired level using a sight tube. Using sight 
tube human compares the present level by the desired 
level and adjust the valve accordingly.
Drawbacks of manual method. 
• Error due to human. 
• Error due to time wasted in opening and closing of 
valves. 
• So there is a need of automatic(human less) system to 
increase the accuracy.
b. Automatic method.
Working of automatic method. 
• In the automatic method human is replaced by a 
controller to increase the accuracy. The liquid 
level is sensed by a float and sensed level is then 
fed to the controller, controller compares the 
sensed level with desired level and error signal is 
generated, according to that error signal 
actuator controls the output valve.
Advantage of automatic method. 
• 1- error is reduced by human by a controller. 
• 2- automatic method is more reliable as compared to 
manual method, it is more stable also. 
• 3- it is costly comparatively but accuracy and stability 
provided by this method can cover the cost.
Laminar v/s Turbulent Flow 
• Laminar Flow 
• Flow dominated by viscosity 
forces is called laminar flow 
and is characterized by a 
smooth, parallel line motion 
of the fluid 
• Turbulent Flow 
• When inertia forces 
dominate, the flow is called 
turbulent flow and is 
characterized by an 
irregular motion of the fluid.
Resistance of Liquid-Level Systems 
• Consider the flow through a short pipe connecting two 
tanks as shown in Figure. 
• Where H1 is the height (or level) of first tank, H2 is the 
height of second tank, R is the resistance in flow of liquid 
and Q is the flow rate.
Resistance of Liquid-Level Systems 
• The resistance for liquid flow in such a pipe is defined as 
the change in the level difference necessary to cause a 
unit change inflow rate.
Resistance in Laminar Flow 
• For laminar flow, the relationship between the steady-state 
flow rate and steady state height at the restriction is 
given by: 
• Where Q = steady-state liquid flow rate in m/s3 
• Kl = constant in m/s2 
• and H = steady-state height in m. 
• The resistance Rl is
Capacitance of Liquid-Level Systems 
• The capacitance of a tank is defined to be the change in 
quantity of stored liquid necessary to cause a unity 
change in the height. 
• Capacitance (C) is cross sectional area (A) of the tank.
Capacitance of Liquid-Level Systems
Modelling
Modelling 
• The rate of change in liquid stored in the tank is equal to 
the flow in minus flow out. 
• The resistance R may be written as 
• Rearranging equation (2)
Substitute qo in equation (3) 
After simplifying above equation 
Taking Laplace transform considering initial conditions to zero
The transfer function can be obtained as
Modelling 
• The liquid level system considered here is analogous to 
the electrical and mechanical systems shown below
Modelling 
• Consider the liquid level system shown in following 
Figure. In this system, two tanks interact. Find transfer 
function Q2(s)/Q(s).
Modelling 
• Tank 1 Pipe 1 
• Tank 2 Pipe 2
Modelling 
• Tank 1 Pipe 1 
• Tank 2 Pipe 2
Taking LT of both equations considering initial conditions to 
zero [i.e. h1(0)=h2(0)=0].
From Equation (1) 
Substitute the expression of H1(s) into Equation (2), we get
Using H2(s) = R2Q2 (s) in the above equation
Water level controller
SIMULATION AND RESULTS 
• RESULT 1— 
CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION 
P=50 
5 
0.0035 Settling time=3 
I=300 
5 
D=0 
Overshoot=1 
Undershoot=1 
Max overshoot=1.2
Water level controller
SIMULATION AND RESULTS 
• RESULT 2 
• — CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION 
P=50 
3 
0.0035 Settling time=4 
I=300 
3 
D=0 
Overshoot=1 
Undershoot=1 
Max overshoot=1.4
Water level controller
SIMULATION AND RESULTS 
• RESULT 3— 
CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION 
P=50 
10 
0.0035 Settling time=2 
I=300 
10 
D=0 
Overshoot=1 
Undershoot=1 
Max overshoot=1.1
Water level controller
SIMULATION AND RESULTS 
• RESULT 4— 
CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION 
P=100 
5 
I=200 
5 
D=0 
0.0035 Settling time=2.5 
Overshoot=0 
Undershoot=0
Water level controller
SIMULATION AND RESULTS 
• RESULT 5— 
CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION 
P=100 
1 
0.001 
I=200 
1 
0.002 
D=0 
0.0035 
Settling 
time=aprox 0 
Overshoot=0 
Undershoot=0
Water level controller
SIMULATION AND RESULTS 
• RESULT 6— 
CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION 
P=100 
1 
0.5 Settling time=3 
I=200 
1 
Overshoot=1 
D=0 
Undershoot=1
Water level controller

More Related Content

PPTX
Control Systems
PDF
Class 8 mathematical modeling of interacting and non-interacting level systems
PPTX
PID Controller
PPT
Pe 3032 wk 1 introduction to control system march 04e
PDF
Class 7 mathematical modeling of liquid-level systems
DOCX
Introduction to Control System Design
PPTX
Second order systems
PPTX
Temperature Control System Using Pid Controller
Control Systems
Class 8 mathematical modeling of interacting and non-interacting level systems
PID Controller
Pe 3032 wk 1 introduction to control system march 04e
Class 7 mathematical modeling of liquid-level systems
Introduction to Control System Design
Second order systems
Temperature Control System Using Pid Controller

What's hot (20)

PDF
Polar Plot
PDF
Controllability and observability
PPTX
Stability of Control System
PPT
First & second order of the control systems
PDF
Modern Control - Lec 03 - Feedback Control Systems Performance and Characteri...
PDF
PID controller in control systems
PPT
Root locus
PPTX
Multi level inverter
PDF
6. steady state error
PDF
Bode plot
PDF
Root locus techniques
PPT
Mechanical translational rotational systems and electrical analogous circuit...
PDF
pid controller
PDF
Frequency Response Analysis
PDF
Automatic Plant Irrigator -Mini Project ECE(without micro controller)
PPT
Control chap4
PPTX
Chapter 1 introduction to control system
PDF
Modern Control - Lec 06 - PID Tuning
PDF
WATER LEVEL CONTROLLER
PPTX
P, PI AND PID CONTROLLER
Polar Plot
Controllability and observability
Stability of Control System
First & second order of the control systems
Modern Control - Lec 03 - Feedback Control Systems Performance and Characteri...
PID controller in control systems
Root locus
Multi level inverter
6. steady state error
Bode plot
Root locus techniques
Mechanical translational rotational systems and electrical analogous circuit...
pid controller
Frequency Response Analysis
Automatic Plant Irrigator -Mini Project ECE(without micro controller)
Control chap4
Chapter 1 introduction to control system
Modern Control - Lec 06 - PID Tuning
WATER LEVEL CONTROLLER
P, PI AND PID CONTROLLER
Ad

Viewers also liked (13)

PPTX
Water level control 01
PDF
PID Tuning using Ziegler Nicholas - MATLAB Approach
PDF
Controller Tuning Method for Non-Linear Conical Tank System
PDF
Level Control of Tank System Using PID Controller-A Review
PPTX
LED WATER LEVEL INDICATOR WITH ALARM
PPTX
Water Level indicator using Ultrasonic sensors
PPTX
Water level indicator by bhushan kumbhalkar
PPTX
WATER PUMP CONTROLLER WITH WATER LEVEL DISPLAY
PPTX
Ultrasonic based non contact type water level indicator using 8051
PPT
Controller ppt
PPTX
Water Level Indicator and Alarm System
PPTX
Water level indicator
PPTX
Pid controllers
Water level control 01
PID Tuning using Ziegler Nicholas - MATLAB Approach
Controller Tuning Method for Non-Linear Conical Tank System
Level Control of Tank System Using PID Controller-A Review
LED WATER LEVEL INDICATOR WITH ALARM
Water Level indicator using Ultrasonic sensors
Water level indicator by bhushan kumbhalkar
WATER PUMP CONTROLLER WITH WATER LEVEL DISPLAY
Ultrasonic based non contact type water level indicator using 8051
Controller ppt
Water Level Indicator and Alarm System
Water level indicator
Pid controllers
Ad

Similar to Water level controller (20)

PPTX
mathematical modeling of liquid-level systems
PDF
A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT OPEN LOOP PID TUNNING TECHNIQUE FOR A LIQ...
PDF
A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT OPEN LOOP PID TUNNING TECHNIQUE FOR A LI...
PDF
A Study on Performance of Different Open Loop PID Tunning Technique for a Liq...
DOCX
Lab 2.docx
PDF
EHR ATTRIBUTE-BASED ACCESS CONTROL (ABAC) FOR FOG COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT
PDF
Soft Computing Technique and Conventional Controller for Conical Tank Level C...
PPTX
PDC NOTES (JAN 2021).pptx
PDF
Pid output fuzzified water level control in mimo coupled tank system
PDF
Comparing the effect of PI and I controllers on a four tank process
PDF
An Adaptive Liquid Level Controller Using Multi Sensor Data Fusion
DOCX
--Liquid level in a tank.docx ddd dddddds
PDF
The Control Analysis of Single Capacity Water Tank Liquid Level System Based ...
PDF
IRJET- Advanced Control Strategies for MIMO System
PDF
Pages from fall2004 entire
PDF
IJRTER_KSK
PDF
10.1.1.193.2962
PPTX
1. Process Dynamics.pptx
PPTX
4. Presentation-1 (2).pptx
PPT
Introduction of process control
mathematical modeling of liquid-level systems
A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT OPEN LOOP PID TUNNING TECHNIQUE FOR A LIQ...
A STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT OPEN LOOP PID TUNNING TECHNIQUE FOR A LI...
A Study on Performance of Different Open Loop PID Tunning Technique for a Liq...
Lab 2.docx
EHR ATTRIBUTE-BASED ACCESS CONTROL (ABAC) FOR FOG COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT
Soft Computing Technique and Conventional Controller for Conical Tank Level C...
PDC NOTES (JAN 2021).pptx
Pid output fuzzified water level control in mimo coupled tank system
Comparing the effect of PI and I controllers on a four tank process
An Adaptive Liquid Level Controller Using Multi Sensor Data Fusion
--Liquid level in a tank.docx ddd dddddds
The Control Analysis of Single Capacity Water Tank Liquid Level System Based ...
IRJET- Advanced Control Strategies for MIMO System
Pages from fall2004 entire
IJRTER_KSK
10.1.1.193.2962
1. Process Dynamics.pptx
4. Presentation-1 (2).pptx
Introduction of process control

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
PPTX
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
PPTX
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
PPTX
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
PDF
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
PDF
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
PDF
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
PDF
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PDF
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
PDF
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
PDF
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
PDF
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
PDF
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
PDF
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
PPTX
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
PPTX
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx
Blue Purple Modern Animated Computer Science Presentation.pdf.pdf
Digital-Transformation-Roadmap-for-Companies.pptx
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
VMware vSphere Foundation How to Sell Presentation-Ver1.4-2-14-2024.pptx
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
Building Integrated photovoltaic BIPV_UPV.pdf
How UI/UX Design Impacts User Retention in Mobile Apps.pdf
Chapter 3 Spatial Domain Image Processing.pdf
Machine learning based COVID-19 study performance prediction
cuic standard and advanced reporting.pdf
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
Advanced methodologies resolving dimensionality complications for autism neur...
Encapsulation_ Review paper, used for researhc scholars
KodekX | Application Modernization Development
Network Security Unit 5.pdf for BCA BBA.
Mobile App Security Testing_ A Comprehensive Guide.pdf
Spectral efficient network and resource selection model in 5G networks
KOM of Painting work and Equipment Insulation REV00 update 25-dec.pptx
ACSFv1EN-58255 AWS Academy Cloud Security Foundations.pptx

Water level controller

  • 1. TANK WATER LEVEL CONTROLLER. SHEKHAR GEHLAUT. AKANSHA RAUTELA ADITYA GOEL
  • 2. WATER LEVEL CONTROLER • Water level controller is used to control the water level in a tank. • In many industries like chemical, there is a restriction on liquid level of a container in such cases level controller can maintain level of the liquid at desired value.
  • 3. WATER LEVEL CONTROL. • There are two methods to control the water level. i. Manual. ii. Automatic.
  • 5. Working of manual method. • The purpose of this system is to maintain the liquid level (h) in the tank as close to the desired liquid level H as possible, even when the output flow rate is varied by opening the valve. • In manual method a human controls the liquid level close to the desired level using a sight tube. Using sight tube human compares the present level by the desired level and adjust the valve accordingly.
  • 6. Drawbacks of manual method. • Error due to human. • Error due to time wasted in opening and closing of valves. • So there is a need of automatic(human less) system to increase the accuracy.
  • 8. Working of automatic method. • In the automatic method human is replaced by a controller to increase the accuracy. The liquid level is sensed by a float and sensed level is then fed to the controller, controller compares the sensed level with desired level and error signal is generated, according to that error signal actuator controls the output valve.
  • 9. Advantage of automatic method. • 1- error is reduced by human by a controller. • 2- automatic method is more reliable as compared to manual method, it is more stable also. • 3- it is costly comparatively but accuracy and stability provided by this method can cover the cost.
  • 10. Laminar v/s Turbulent Flow • Laminar Flow • Flow dominated by viscosity forces is called laminar flow and is characterized by a smooth, parallel line motion of the fluid • Turbulent Flow • When inertia forces dominate, the flow is called turbulent flow and is characterized by an irregular motion of the fluid.
  • 11. Resistance of Liquid-Level Systems • Consider the flow through a short pipe connecting two tanks as shown in Figure. • Where H1 is the height (or level) of first tank, H2 is the height of second tank, R is the resistance in flow of liquid and Q is the flow rate.
  • 12. Resistance of Liquid-Level Systems • The resistance for liquid flow in such a pipe is defined as the change in the level difference necessary to cause a unit change inflow rate.
  • 13. Resistance in Laminar Flow • For laminar flow, the relationship between the steady-state flow rate and steady state height at the restriction is given by: • Where Q = steady-state liquid flow rate in m/s3 • Kl = constant in m/s2 • and H = steady-state height in m. • The resistance Rl is
  • 14. Capacitance of Liquid-Level Systems • The capacitance of a tank is defined to be the change in quantity of stored liquid necessary to cause a unity change in the height. • Capacitance (C) is cross sectional area (A) of the tank.
  • 17. Modelling • The rate of change in liquid stored in the tank is equal to the flow in minus flow out. • The resistance R may be written as • Rearranging equation (2)
  • 18. Substitute qo in equation (3) After simplifying above equation Taking Laplace transform considering initial conditions to zero
  • 19. The transfer function can be obtained as
  • 20. Modelling • The liquid level system considered here is analogous to the electrical and mechanical systems shown below
  • 21. Modelling • Consider the liquid level system shown in following Figure. In this system, two tanks interact. Find transfer function Q2(s)/Q(s).
  • 22. Modelling • Tank 1 Pipe 1 • Tank 2 Pipe 2
  • 23. Modelling • Tank 1 Pipe 1 • Tank 2 Pipe 2
  • 24. Taking LT of both equations considering initial conditions to zero [i.e. h1(0)=h2(0)=0].
  • 25. From Equation (1) Substitute the expression of H1(s) into Equation (2), we get
  • 26. Using H2(s) = R2Q2 (s) in the above equation
  • 28. SIMULATION AND RESULTS • RESULT 1— CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION P=50 5 0.0035 Settling time=3 I=300 5 D=0 Overshoot=1 Undershoot=1 Max overshoot=1.2
  • 30. SIMULATION AND RESULTS • RESULT 2 • — CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION P=50 3 0.0035 Settling time=4 I=300 3 D=0 Overshoot=1 Undershoot=1 Max overshoot=1.4
  • 32. SIMULATION AND RESULTS • RESULT 3— CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION P=50 10 0.0035 Settling time=2 I=300 10 D=0 Overshoot=1 Undershoot=1 Max overshoot=1.1
  • 34. SIMULATION AND RESULTS • RESULT 4— CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION P=100 5 I=200 5 D=0 0.0035 Settling time=2.5 Overshoot=0 Undershoot=0
  • 36. SIMULATION AND RESULTS • RESULT 5— CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION P=100 1 0.001 I=200 1 0.002 D=0 0.0035 Settling time=aprox 0 Overshoot=0 Undershoot=0
  • 38. SIMULATION AND RESULTS • RESULT 6— CONTROLLER GAIN GAIN 2 CONCLUSION P=100 1 0.5 Settling time=3 I=200 1 Overshoot=1 D=0 Undershoot=1