SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1133 TEACHING READING

Week 1: What is Reading?
What is reading?
decode, decipher, identify
articulate, speak, pronounce
understand, respond, meaning
                  Without comprehension, a reader is just
                  „barking at print‟ – think of all those late
                  nights spent poring through dense textbooks in
                  your university years; seeing the words but
                  not making any sense of them?

                  The main purpose of reading is to get
                  meaning from the text
Why do we read?
For pleasure
For information
How do we read?
Reading is decoding + using knowledge of
sentence structure + comprehension
We usually read silently
How do we teach reading?
We can‟t; we can help our learners to effectively
use reading skills
 decoding skills (phonics, spellling

patterns), sight words, affixes, vocabulary, using
context, identifying context clues (signal
words, punctuation), using knowledge of sentence
structure…
What makes a text difficult?

 Text A:




                               http://www.seismosoc.org/publi
                               cations/srl/eew/posters/index.p
                               hp
Text A:
We cannot decode if we don‟t know the
language!

Decoding = breaking down words, recognizing
letters and letter combinations + structure (e.g.
recognizing „-ed‟ endings and the meaning they
carry)
What makes a text difficult?

 Text B:
 If a set of raw scores, such as student test scores, is
 normally distributed, then so are the standard score
 equivalents; similarly, the normal curve equivalencies
 indicated in Figure 12.1 for the various standard scores
 are accurate only if the distribution is normal. Raw
 scores can be transformed mathematically to insure that
 the distribution of standard scores will be normal.
 Further, standard scores can be compared only if all the
 derived scores are based on the raw scores of the
 same group (Gay, Mills, &Airasian, 2009, p. 314).
Text B:
Lack of prior knowledge – we (or I) don‟t know
enough about quantitative research to grasp the
meaning of the text the first time we read it. The
vocabulary in this text isn‟t difficult; it‟s the
concepts that are challenging to the reader
without sufficient prior knowledge.

The difficulty of a text depends on the amount
of previous knowledge I bring to the text.
What makes a text difficult?

  Text C:

Cavorting in the vicinity of the residential area
 populated by those of piscatorial avocation, the
 miniscule crustacean was enmeshed in a reticulated
 object with interstices between the intersections.

                                 (Nuttall, 2005, p. 6)
Text C:
The vocabulary is difficult, therefore the „code‟ is
only partly the same as the reader. Note that
the text is not intellectually challenging.
Background Knowledge




 Shared assumptions – where the circles overlap. A scientist and an
 architect – need to have a common language to understand each
 other. Our role as reading teachers is to help learners activate their
 background knowledge (BK) about the text topic or provide the
 required BK so they can comprehend the text.
Background Knowledge – an example

   Read this passage:
     The bus careered along and ended up in the hedge.
      Several passengers were hurt. The driver was questioned
      by police.
                                              (Nuttall, pp. 7-8)

    How do you visualize this scene? (What do you think
     happened? Describe the driver, the environment, the
     possible causes)
Background Knowledge – an example
Read on and notice if/how „the picture‟ in your head changes:

  She…

   …was later congratulated on her quick thinking

                …and skillful handling

                     …of the bus when the brakes failed.
What influences/adds to BK?
one‟s
culture, education, media, sex, politics, religion, moral
code, other languages, life experiences (places
travelled, work experience, social interactions)….

We have background knowledge about syntax/
grammatical rules and about content.
BK is often cultural knowledge
   As a teacher, I can anticipate that my new
    immigrant students will not be familiar with the issue
    of Quebec separatism, so I will avoid giving them a
    reading text on this topic OR I will:
     Do  background teaching: issues, concepts, vocabulary
     Give background reading or have a thorough
      discussion (or lesson) on the topic before I give them the
      text

What other topics might ESL students have little or
know BK about?
Schema
= how we store organize our background knowledge.
  How we interpret a text depends on our schema
  (plural: schemata)
= “a mental structure; abstract in that it doesn‟t
  related to a particular experience but rather is a
  culmination of our related experiences and how we
  have mentally organized them in our brains”

See http://iteslj.org/Articles/Stott-Schema.html for a brief
discussion about schema theory and its limitations in the context of
ESL reading.
Psycholinguistic model of reading

     sample predict  read  confirm, revise

 We thought he was coming on the 9 o’clock flight
  what do you think happened to him?


  We thought he was coming on the9o’clock flight
   so now you know he didn’t come in on that flight, but on an earlier or
  later one?

  We thought he was coming on the 9 o’clock
  flight, but he didn’t get in until midnight.
   this either confirms your prediction or you have to revise it.
References
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., Airasian, P. (2009). Educational
 research: Competencies for analysis and
 applications. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education.

Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign
 language. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Publishers
 Limited.

More Related Content

PPTX
Notes on langauge
PPTX
Barthes Narrative Codes
PDF
Lecture 4 reading models (2)
PPT
Roland barthes.
PDF
Lecture 5 reading skills
PPTX
Barthes 5 narrative codes
PPT
Using a nonsense sentence to explain the process of reading
DOC
Progress map literature
Notes on langauge
Barthes Narrative Codes
Lecture 4 reading models (2)
Roland barthes.
Lecture 5 reading skills
Barthes 5 narrative codes
Using a nonsense sentence to explain the process of reading
Progress map literature

What's hot (18)

PPTX
Schema Theory
PDF
Lecture 1 reading an introduction
PPTX
Writing & reading skills 1
PDF
Rubric Task
PPTX
Schemata and reading comprehension
DOCX
Theoretical models of reading -clarissa a. pelayo
PPTX
Barthes 5 narrative codes
PPTX
Nlp Sentemental analysis of Tweetr And CaseStudy
PPT
1 nature of reading
PPTX
Barthes’ enigma theory
PPTX
Roland Barthes' Theory
PPT
Three cueing systems
PPT
The Three Levels Of Reading
PDF
Reading a psycholinguistic_guessing_game
PPTX
2.1 - Practices of looking.pptx
DOCX
Simile Personifcation Metaphor Lesson
PPTX
Word study
PPTX
From text as pretext to developing effective reading skills braz-tesol brasilia
Schema Theory
Lecture 1 reading an introduction
Writing & reading skills 1
Rubric Task
Schemata and reading comprehension
Theoretical models of reading -clarissa a. pelayo
Barthes 5 narrative codes
Nlp Sentemental analysis of Tweetr And CaseStudy
1 nature of reading
Barthes’ enigma theory
Roland Barthes' Theory
Three cueing systems
The Three Levels Of Reading
Reading a psycholinguistic_guessing_game
2.1 - Practices of looking.pptx
Simile Personifcation Metaphor Lesson
Word study
From text as pretext to developing effective reading skills braz-tesol brasilia
Ad

Similar to TESO1133 online - Week 1 what is reading (20)

PDF
Student Skills Improvement Training.pdf
PDF
What every teacher needs to know about comprehension
PPT
PPTX
Teaching reading
RTF
3 bab ii
PPT
Teaching Reading Report, Text Structure and Readability
PPTX
PDF
Teaching receptive skills.pdf
PPT
A mind at time 2
PPT
TEACHING&TESTING READING.ppt
PPT
TEACHING&TESTING READING.ppt
PPTX
Rbl presentasi kelompok 4
PDF
CHESS+Reading.pdf
PPT
Increasing Comprehensible Input In Vocabulary Instruction
PPT
Student mh 2
DOCX
TEACHING READING FINAL DOCUMENT FOR TEACHING READING.PPT
PPTX
RBL - Teaching Language Skills 'Reading' and 'Listening' - 4th Group
PPTX
Reading for adults 2
PPTX
Reading for adults 2
Student Skills Improvement Training.pdf
What every teacher needs to know about comprehension
Teaching reading
3 bab ii
Teaching Reading Report, Text Structure and Readability
Teaching receptive skills.pdf
A mind at time 2
TEACHING&TESTING READING.ppt
TEACHING&TESTING READING.ppt
Rbl presentasi kelompok 4
CHESS+Reading.pdf
Increasing Comprehensible Input In Vocabulary Instruction
Student mh 2
TEACHING READING FINAL DOCUMENT FOR TEACHING READING.PPT
RBL - Teaching Language Skills 'Reading' and 'Listening' - 4th Group
Reading for adults 2
Reading for adults 2
Ad

More from s_yuen (11)

PPTX
TESOL & Technology Session 2 for Kaplan PLI
PPTX
Kaplan pli tesol&tech s1
PPTX
Creating digital stories - the process
PPTX
Reading writing connection
PPTX
Return policy signs
PPTX
Visuals for can con4 listening
PPTX
Making a fruit smoothie
PPTX
Adventures in Digital Storytelling - ELSANet workshop Oct 17 2011
PPTX
Ppt session 4
PPTX
CNH ELSA digital storytelling workshop: PPT session 2
PPTX
CNHELSAdsp PPT session 1
TESOL & Technology Session 2 for Kaplan PLI
Kaplan pli tesol&tech s1
Creating digital stories - the process
Reading writing connection
Return policy signs
Visuals for can con4 listening
Making a fruit smoothie
Adventures in Digital Storytelling - ELSANet workshop Oct 17 2011
Ppt session 4
CNH ELSA digital storytelling workshop: PPT session 2
CNHELSAdsp PPT session 1

TESO1133 online - Week 1 what is reading

  • 1. 1133 TEACHING READING Week 1: What is Reading?
  • 2. What is reading? decode, decipher, identify articulate, speak, pronounce understand, respond, meaning Without comprehension, a reader is just „barking at print‟ – think of all those late nights spent poring through dense textbooks in your university years; seeing the words but not making any sense of them? The main purpose of reading is to get meaning from the text
  • 3. Why do we read? For pleasure For information
  • 4. How do we read? Reading is decoding + using knowledge of sentence structure + comprehension We usually read silently
  • 5. How do we teach reading? We can‟t; we can help our learners to effectively use reading skills  decoding skills (phonics, spellling patterns), sight words, affixes, vocabulary, using context, identifying context clues (signal words, punctuation), using knowledge of sentence structure…
  • 6. What makes a text difficult? Text A: http://www.seismosoc.org/publi cations/srl/eew/posters/index.p hp
  • 7. Text A: We cannot decode if we don‟t know the language! Decoding = breaking down words, recognizing letters and letter combinations + structure (e.g. recognizing „-ed‟ endings and the meaning they carry)
  • 8. What makes a text difficult? Text B: If a set of raw scores, such as student test scores, is normally distributed, then so are the standard score equivalents; similarly, the normal curve equivalencies indicated in Figure 12.1 for the various standard scores are accurate only if the distribution is normal. Raw scores can be transformed mathematically to insure that the distribution of standard scores will be normal. Further, standard scores can be compared only if all the derived scores are based on the raw scores of the same group (Gay, Mills, &Airasian, 2009, p. 314).
  • 9. Text B: Lack of prior knowledge – we (or I) don‟t know enough about quantitative research to grasp the meaning of the text the first time we read it. The vocabulary in this text isn‟t difficult; it‟s the concepts that are challenging to the reader without sufficient prior knowledge. The difficulty of a text depends on the amount of previous knowledge I bring to the text.
  • 10. What makes a text difficult? Text C: Cavorting in the vicinity of the residential area populated by those of piscatorial avocation, the miniscule crustacean was enmeshed in a reticulated object with interstices between the intersections. (Nuttall, 2005, p. 6)
  • 11. Text C: The vocabulary is difficult, therefore the „code‟ is only partly the same as the reader. Note that the text is not intellectually challenging.
  • 12. Background Knowledge Shared assumptions – where the circles overlap. A scientist and an architect – need to have a common language to understand each other. Our role as reading teachers is to help learners activate their background knowledge (BK) about the text topic or provide the required BK so they can comprehend the text.
  • 13. Background Knowledge – an example  Read this passage:  The bus careered along and ended up in the hedge. Several passengers were hurt. The driver was questioned by police. (Nuttall, pp. 7-8) How do you visualize this scene? (What do you think happened? Describe the driver, the environment, the possible causes)
  • 14. Background Knowledge – an example Read on and notice if/how „the picture‟ in your head changes: She… …was later congratulated on her quick thinking …and skillful handling …of the bus when the brakes failed.
  • 15. What influences/adds to BK? one‟s culture, education, media, sex, politics, religion, moral code, other languages, life experiences (places travelled, work experience, social interactions)…. We have background knowledge about syntax/ grammatical rules and about content.
  • 16. BK is often cultural knowledge  As a teacher, I can anticipate that my new immigrant students will not be familiar with the issue of Quebec separatism, so I will avoid giving them a reading text on this topic OR I will:  Do background teaching: issues, concepts, vocabulary  Give background reading or have a thorough discussion (or lesson) on the topic before I give them the text What other topics might ESL students have little or know BK about?
  • 17. Schema = how we store organize our background knowledge. How we interpret a text depends on our schema (plural: schemata) = “a mental structure; abstract in that it doesn‟t related to a particular experience but rather is a culmination of our related experiences and how we have mentally organized them in our brains” See http://iteslj.org/Articles/Stott-Schema.html for a brief discussion about schema theory and its limitations in the context of ESL reading.
  • 18. Psycholinguistic model of reading sample predict  read  confirm, revise We thought he was coming on the 9 o’clock flight  what do you think happened to him? We thought he was coming on the9o’clock flight  so now you know he didn’t come in on that flight, but on an earlier or later one? We thought he was coming on the 9 o’clock flight, but he didn’t get in until midnight.  this either confirms your prediction or you have to revise it.
  • 19. References Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education. Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Publishers Limited.