White Paper: Real-Time Monitoring of Passive Optical Networks

D-5134_Rev. A 1
In-Service PON Monitoring
Real-Time Monitoring of
Passive Optical Networks
White paper

Introduction
The practice of optical fiber for data transmission from transoceanic to domestic applications
is nothing new. While initially the immunity to electromagnetic interference (EMI) played a
vital role in propelling the fiber-optic network ahead, recent demonstration of wavelength
division multiplexed (WDM) transmission of 101 Tb/s (1Tb/s = 1000Gb/s) over a distance
of 165 km single mode fiber only future-proofs the existence of fiber-optic communication.
Increased fiber penetration in applications such as fiber-to-the-home (FFTH) to fiber-to-the-
antenna (FFTA) is inevitable however raises key questions concerning network monitoring
and protection.
For a service provider, ensuring a high level of network performance is of utmost importance.
Every second of the interruption in the data traffic not only leads to economic dismay but
also exhaustion of valuable resources (time and expert personnel) that would be much
appreciated elsewhere.
In this paper, we delve into the basics of existing monitoring technology and discuss an
interesting in-service real-time monitoring solution that provides instantaneous root cause
of the fault without any influence on data traffic. Furthermore, applications of this novel
technology are also illustrated.
Fiber Monitoring Background:
How does an OTDR work?
Figure 1
(a) OTDR Principle
(b) OTDR Fiber Profile

D-5134_Rev. A 3
While almost all field-deployed active optical systems are equipped with management
layer on top to monitor the data-in-transit, the actual fault location in the fiber or passive
equipment in a passive optical network (PON) needs further investment. The Operations,
Administration and Maintenance (OAM) service detects, isolates and notifies the operator
of the fault. Classically, a power meter or an optical time-domain reflectometer (OTDR) is
then utilized to analyze the spatial information of the detected failure.
This is also the convention during fiber installations. An engineer has to be at the location
and check the optical fiber individually with the OTDR while all the services in the fiber are
paused during this period.
The working principle of OTDR is based on Rayleigh backscattering and Fresnel reflection.
As depicted in Figure.1a, the OTDR has a transmitter which launches short duration optical
pulses into the fiber and a high-speed receiver which measures the reflected signal.
The measured reflected signal is then traced against time delay. In the actual OTDR display
(see Figure.1b), the time axis is already converted to length of the fiber, the knowledge of
which helps locate the fault with a certain tolerance (1m for standard OTDRs). The OTDR
trace can be easily interpreted as the peaks and dips can be traced back to the physical
effects of the fiber as follows (ref. Figure 1. b)
1) Distributed loss
The types of fibers and operation wavelengths impact the profile that is seen in
the OTDR display. The OTDR needs to know the type of fiber being analyzed,
i.e. the refractive index of the fiber which influences the speed of light in the
fiber. Then the OTDR can accurately measure distance from the total time delay
of the reflected pulse. Distributed loss seen in the profile comes from Rayleigh
backscattering in the fiber. The distributed loss will appear different for different
operating wavelengths. Longer wavelengths exhibit less scattering and therefore
will have lower loss per km than shorter wavelengths.
2) Discrete reflections
A drastic change in the fiber density causes Fresnel reflections. While the fiber
itself is homogenous, these discrete peaks occur when an OTDR pulse encounters
connectors, ends of fibers or fiber breaks. The magnitude of the peak is influenced
by the change in the material density and the connector type (angled or straight).
In the event of fiber break, the OTDR displays a huge peak followed by random
noise at the location of the fault.
3) Dips
The dips in the profile arise from bends or splices. At these points a part of the
signal leaks out thus reducing the signal power. Longer wavelengths suffer more
as they leak out of a fiber easier than shorter wavelengths.
A conventional OTDR can test the fiber in three wavelengths, which are in-effect the operating
wavelengths of the fiber, ie., 850 nm, 1300 nm, and 1550 nm. Therefore, a conventional
OTDR can be used when the fibers are being installed or only after discontinuing the
services. Additionally, the use of an optical power splitter in PON to split with higher number
of tributaries reduces the resolution of the OTDR and the spatial information is lost.

These drawbacks limit the application of classical OTDR to monitoring point-to-point networks
[Hornung, ICC , Vol. 4, pp. 1563 –1571, IEEE 1990]. As a consequence, numerous other
monitoring systems have been recommended. In this paper, the reflector-based real-time
monitoring is explained.
Novel Reflector-Based Real-Time Fiber Monitoring
The passive optical network, as the name reflects, is implemented using only passive
components between the optical line terminal (OLT) placed at the central office (CO) and
the optical network terminals (ONT) located on the customer premise (Ref. Figure 2).
PON is widely applied as the optimal fiber infrastructure for employing fiber-to-the-x (x can
be house, antenna, curb and so on). PON can have either time division multiplexed (TDM)
or wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) services. In TDM-PON, a passive optical
power splitter is implemented which distributes all the services (voice, data and CATV) from
OLT into a number of required tributaries connected to the ONT.
On the other hand a WDM-PON is realized when a dedicated wavelength needs to be
transmitted to the ONT. In this case, all the tributaries will have different signals. A WDM-
PON has the best application for fiber-based mobile front-hauling (or FFTA) which reduces
latency and synchronization issues pertinent to mobile backhaul networks.
Numerous point-to-multipoint monitoring ideas, from inserting OTDR functionality into the
transceiver to modifying ONU have been proposed and tests conducted however deemed
impractical. An interesting approach was presented by Ozawa and team [Kazumasa et
al, Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors , Venice 2000] that used a tunable OTDR at
the CO and each ONT was equipped with a reflector which was wavelength selective to
identify different branches.
Figure 2
FTTH PON Architecture

D-5134_Rev. A 5
However, in practice the cost of manufacturing reflectors with different specifications and
the use of costly tunable OTDR have limited the application of this method. Recently, a
modified version of this method has gained popularity which is discussed further in this
paper.
The novel reflector-based real-time fiber monitoring for FFTH application is implemented as
shown in Figure 3. This method not only detects the fault but also identifies the underlying
cause, aiding the operator with a targeted remedy and saving service costs.
A WDM multiplexer is required at the CO to couple the services (CATV at 1550 nm and
video and data at 1310 nm and 1490 nm) with 1650 nm port for OTDR monitoring. At the
customer edge, a reflector with form-factor that of an in-line attenuator is inserted. As shown
in Figure 4, a filter integrated in the adapter blocks the 1650 nm wavelength and transmits
the wavelengths from 1260-1618 nm. The reflected 1650 nm OTDR signal traverses back
to the OTDR receiver which then displays the distance where the reflectors are positioned.
The reflector can also be manufactured as a patch cable or a pigtail. The choice of the form
factor depends on the desired specification and the installation requirements.
In practice, one has to take care that the reflectors at different branches are not located at
the same distance from the splitter. In an event, where two or more reflectors are equidistant
from the splitter, the OTDR monitoring will not be able to distinguish the branch. Therefore,
during installation, a detailed network layout has to be designed including the exact
location of the reflectors.
Figure 3
FTTH PON Monitoring
Figure 4
Reflector

The reflector also introduces an insertion loss of maximum 1dB which needs to be calculated
during network planning. Once installed properly, these reflectors can be used to diagnose
live network without interrupting the services.
The fault is allocated by comparing the reference trace taken during installation from every
branch with the live trace. Because of the high reflectivity (95%) of the reflector, the spatial-
resolution of the OTDR is improved for better performance outlook.
Additionally, the splitting proportion can be extended from 16(without reflectors) to 32
branches.
Similar monitoring approach can be implemented for Ethernet passive optical networks that
deliver Ethernet services to business customers. As depicted in Figure 5, a WDM coupler is
used to insert the OTDR monitoring signal which gets reflected from the far-end implanted
reflector. In such a scenario, a continuous fiber monitoring incorporates an optical switching
device located at the CO which switches the OTDR monitoring port from different branches.
The switch sweeps through all the used ports and the reflected signal is measured quasi-
real time. As there is no power splitter included, the OTDR in such a scenario enjoys a high
dynamic range and therefore can pinpoint locate even the smallest of fiber defects.
Advantages
The reflector-based novel technology to monitor passive optical networks without influencing
data traffic enjoys several benefits. Because of the small and robust form-factor of the
reflectors, it can be easily installed into an existing network and its passive nature makes
it a cost-effective solution. The automatic OTDR-based system supports the operators with
initial installation, measuring and further on remote monitoring of the network. It ensures a
high productivity in network operation and maintenance by providing the operators the root
cause and the pin-point location of the faults.
Figure 5
Direct Ethernet Monitoring

D-5134_Rev. A 7
Conclusion
The reflector-based real-time monitoring requires a comprehensive network planning and
design to equip the subscriber links with the reflectors at the correct distances. Once
deployed, the operators can enjoy the remote diagnosis via OTDR of the network which is
fully automatic. The advantages of simplicity and cost efficiency stand out for the reflector-
based system that makes this solution timeless.
About the Author
Susmita Adhikari has a M.Sc. in Digital Communication with over six years of research
and product management experience from long-haul communication to metro. At
HUBER+SUHNER Cube Optics, she works as a Product Placement Manager and ensures
a good visibility of newly introduced products via technical marketing and customer
interactions.

HUBER+SUHNER Cube Optics AG
Robert-Koch-Strasse 30
55129 Mainz
Germany
phone: +49-6131-69851-0
fax: +49-6131-69851-79
sales.cubo@hubersuhner.com
www.hubersuhner.com
www.cubeoptics.com
HUBER+SUHNER Cube Optics AG
is certified according to ISO 9001.
WAIVER
It is exclusively in written agreements that we provide our customers with
warrants and representations as to the technical specifications and/or the
fitness for any particular purpose. The facts and figures contained herein are
carefully compiled to the best of our knowledge, but they are intended for
general informational purposes only.
D-5134 Rev. A

White Paper: Real-Time Monitoring of Passive Optical Networks

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to White Paper: Real-Time Monitoring of Passive Optical Networks (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

White Paper: Real-Time Monitoring of Passive Optical Networks